Skip to main content

Table 4 Quality assessment for clinical studies included in the presente review according to the critical appraisal tools of JBI Scale for analytical cross-sectional studies

From: IL-23/IL-17 axis levels in gingival crevicular fluid of subjects with periodontal disease: a systematic review

Authors

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

Overall score and quality

Nair et al., [28]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

Wankhede, and Dhadse, [29]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

Nainee et al., 2020 [30]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

Sadeghi et al., [31]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

Kalate et al., [32]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

Althebeti et al., [33]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

Mitani et al., [34]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

Himani et al., [35]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

Nagireddy et al., [36]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

Shaker et al., [37]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

Ay et al., [38]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

Vernal et al., [39]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

  1. Question (Q); N/A, not aplicable; Y, yes; U, unclear. (1)Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? (2)Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? (3)Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? (4)Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? (5)Was confounding factors identified? (6)Were strategies to ideal with confounding factors stated? (7)Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? (8)Was appropriate statistical analysis used?