Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate logistic regression for association of diverse variables with apical periodontitis

From: Predictors of apical periodontitis in root canal treated teeth from an adult Nepalese subpopulation: a cross-sectional study

Variables

Total N (%)

Periapical Status

β

OR

CI at 95%

p-value

AP absent n (%)

AP present n (%)

Age Category (Years)

 18–29

68 (22.7)

51 (75.0)

17 (25.0)

 

1

Reference

 

 30–39

61 (20.3)

43 (70.7)

18 (29.5)

0.22

1.25

0.57–2.73

0.566

 40–49

51 (17.0)

27 (52.9)

24 (47.0)

0.98

2.66

1.22–5.79

0.013

 50–59

55 (18.3)

40 (72.7)

15 (27.3)

0.11

1.12

0.50–2.52

0.775

 ≥ 60

65 (21.7)

44 (67.7)

21 (32.3)

0.35

1.43

0.67–3.04

0.352

Sex

 Male

128 (42.7)

77 (60.1)

51 (39.8)

 

1

Reference

 

 Female

172 (57.3)

128 (74.4)

44 (25.6)

-0.65

0.51

0.31–0.84

0.009*

Tooth Type

 Incisors

48 (16.0)

38 (79.1)

10 (20.9)

 

1

Reference

 

 Canines

14 (4.7)

10 (71.4)

4 (28.5)

0.41

1.52

0.39–5.87

0.544

 Premolars

75 (25.0)

53 (70.7)

22 (29.3)

0.45

1.57

0.67–3.71

0.297

 Molars

163 (54.3)

104 (63.8)

59 (36.2)

0.76

2.15

1.002–4.63

0.049

Root Canal Treatment Quality

 Adequate

137 (45.7)

123 (89.8)

14 (10.2)

 

1

Reference

 

 Inadequate

163 (54.3)

82 (50.3)

81 (49.7)

2.16

8.67

4.61–16.33

< 0.001*

Coronal Restoration Quality

 Adequate

138 (46.0)

117 (84.8)

21 (15.2)

 

1

Reference

 

 Inadequate

162 (54.0)

88 (54.3)

74 (45.7)

1.54

4.68

2.68–8.18

< 0.001*

Coronal Restoration Type

 Lost Restoration

46 (15.3)

17 (36.9)

29 (63.1)

 

1

Reference

 

 Crown

126 (42.0)

93 (73.8)

33 (26.2)

-1.57

0.20

0.10–0.42

< 0.001*

 Filling

128 (42.7)

95 (74.2)

33 (25.8)

-1.59

0.20

0.09–0.41

< 0.001*

  1. Abbreviations: AP, apical periodontitis; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. *Statistically significant