Skip to main content

Table 3 The results of statistical tests for the difference in upper canine retraction between both sides (mm/month)

From: Effectiveness of a low-intensity static magnetic field in accelerating upper canine retraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Time

Variable

n

Mean

Std. deviation

Mean difference

Stander deviation difference

The confidence interval 95%

t value

P value

Lower

Upper

T0-T1

C.RetS.C

17

1.42

0.661

-0.208

0.33

-0.38

-0.04

-2.601

0.019*

C.RetS.E

17

1.63

0.592

T1-T2

C.RetS.C

17

1.17

0.606

-0.721

0.59

-1.03

-0.42

-5.001

0.000***

C.RetS.E

17

1.89

0.507

T2-T3

C.RetS.C

14

1.24

0.613

-0.124

0.42

-0.36

0.12

-1.117

0.2840

(NS)

C.RetS.E

14

1.37

0.493

T3-T4

C.RetS.C

4

1.38

0.35

0.1640

0.65

-0.87

1.19

0.505

0.6490

(NS)

C.RetS.E

4

1.21

0.489

T0-Tf

C.RetS.C

17

1.35

0.41

-0.992

0.16

-0.40

-0.24

-6.64

0.000***

C.RetS.E

17

1.67

0.43

  1. T0-T1: 1st month after upper canine retraction, T1-T2: 2nd month after upper canine retraction, T2-T3: 3rd month after upper canine retraction, T3-T4: 4th month after upper canine retraction, T0-TF: the overall duration
  2. C.RetS.C: Canine retraction speed control side (mm/month)
  3. C.RetS.E: Canine retraction speed experimental side (mm/month)
  4. NS No significant difference
  5. * Significant difference at P < 0.05, *** Significant difference at P < 0.01. Using a paired t test