Table 2 Clinical outcomes of 3 kinds of veneers evaluated at baseline and at follow-up time point (mean, 35 months)
Evaluation criteria | SZ (n, %) | PG (n, %) | MG (n, %) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Follow-up | Baseline | Follow-up | Baseline | Follow-up | |||||||||||||
A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | |
Color match | 43 (95.56) | 2Â (4.44) | 0 | 43 (95.56) | 2Â (4.44) | 0 | 40 (100) | 0 | 0 | 40 (100) | 0 | 0 | 41Â (100) | 0 | 0 | 41Â (100) | 0 | 0 |
Anatomic form | 45 (100) | 0 | 0 | 45 (100) | 0 | 0 | 40 (100) | 0 | 0 | 40 (100) | 0 | 0 | 41 (100) | 0 | 0 | 41 (100) | 0 | 0 |
Restoration integrity | 45 (100) | 0 | 0 | 45 (100) | 0 | 0 | 40 (100) | 0 | 0 | 38 (95) | 0 | 2 (5) | 41 (100) | 0 | 0 | 41 (100) | 0 | 0 |
Restoration retention | 45 (100) | 0 | 0 | 45 (100) | 0 | 0 | 40 (100) | 0 | 0 | 40 (100) | 0 | 0 | 41 (100) | 0 | 0 | 41 (100) | 0 | 0 |
Marginal adaptation | 45 (100) | 0 | 0 | 45 (100) | 0 | 0 | 40 (100) | 0 | 0 | 39 (97.50) | 1 (2.50) | 0 | 41 (100) | 0 | 0 | 37 (90.24) | 4 (9.76) | 0 |
Marginal discoloration | - | - | - | 45 (100) | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | 39 (100) | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | 41 (100) | 0 | 0 |
Secondary caries | - | - | - | 45 (100) | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | 39 (97.50) | 0 | 1 (2.50) | - | - | - | 41 (100) | 0 | 0 |