Skip to main content
Download PDF

Aesthetic impact of resin infiltration and its mechanical effect on ceramic bonding for white spot lesions

BMC Oral Health volume 24, Article number: 365 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Treating white spot lesions (WSLs) with resin infiltration alone may not be sufficient, raising questions about its compatibility with other treatments amid controversial or incomplete data. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the aesthetic feasibility of resin infiltration combined with bleaching, as well as its potential mechanical effect on ceramic bonding to WSLs.

Methods

One hundred and fifty flat enamel surfaces of bovine incisors were prepared. Ninety specimens were deminerailized and randomly assigned to three groups(n = 30): post-bleaching resin infiltration (Bl-R), pre-bleaching resin infiltration (R-Bl), and only resin infiltration (R). Color, surface roughness and microhardness were assessed in immediate, thermocycling and pigmentation tests. The remaining sixty samples were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 20): control (Ctrl), bonding (Bo), pre-bonding resin infiltration (R-Bo). Shear bonding strength, failure mode, micro-leakage depth and interface morphology were evaluated after ceramic bonding. The Tukey test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for statistical analysis.

Results

For the effect of resin infiltration and bleaching on WSLs, the R-Bl group showed the worst chromic masking ability, with the highest |ΔL|, |Δa|, |Δb|, and ΔE values after treatment. Compared with those in the Bl-R group, the R-Bl and R groups showed significant time-dependent staining, which is possibly attributed to their surface roughness. For the effect of resin infiltration on the adhesive properties of WSLs, resin infiltration reduced the staining penetration depth of WSLs from 2393.54 ± 1118.86 μm to 188.46 ± 89.96 μm (P < 0.05) while reducing WSLs porosity in SEM observation.

Conclusions

Post-bleaching resin infiltration proved to be advantageous in the aesthetic treatment of WSLs. Resin infiltration did not compromise bonding strength but it did reduce microleakage and enhance marginal sealing. Overall, resin infiltration can effectively enhance the chromatic results of treated WSLs and prevent long-term bonding failure between ceramics and enamel. Based on these findings, the use of post-bleaching resin infiltration is recommended, and resin infiltration before ceramic bonding is deemed viable in clinical practice.

Peer Review reports

Background

White spot lesions (WSLs) typically appear when changes in pH levels cause the enamel matrix to dissolve internally. This process results in a porous enamel structure, leading to the formation of opaque patches on the tooth surface [1]. These lesions are often seen in the early stages of enamel caries [2], dental fluorosis [3], enamel developmental defects [4], and during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances [5]. The prevalence of WSLs varies from 2 to 97% due to various causal factors [5,6,7]. However, they are commonly observed in adolescents as a result of inadequate oral hygiene and extensive orthodontic treatments [5]. Some researches indicate no significant gender differences in the occurrence of WSLs [8], while others report a two to three times higher incidence in males within orthodontic populations [9]. Nevertheless, certain researchers observe a higher prevalence in females [10]. Treatment options for WSLs include microabrasion [11, 12], external bleaching [11, 13], remineralization [14,15,16], resin infiltration [17,18,19,20,21,22], and ceramic veneer restoration [3, 23]. Among these options, resin infiltration, a minimally invasive approach, has emerged as a “gold standard” intervention method.

Resin infiltration, primarily consisting of Triethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate, exhibits low viscosity, a reduced contact angle, and a high penetration coefficient. This composition facilitates effective penetration into demineralized enamel, resulting in the formation of a resin-matrix complex during the curing process [22]. Both clinical and in-vitro studies have established its significant role in enhancing the aesthetic and mechanical properties of enamel affected by WSLs [17,18,19,20]. Aesthetically, resin infiltration is praised for its ability to replicate the natural translucency, reflectance, and fluorescence of healthy enamel [24, 25]. Mechanically, it has been demonstrated to elevate surface micro-hardness, reduce surface roughness, and enhance resistance to acidic challenges [26, 27]. However, it is essential to acknowledge that in cases of severe fluorosis or structural degradation, resin infiltration alone may not be adequate to achieve the desired aesthetic results [11, 21, 28, 29], while bleaching and veneer restoration is reserved for situations where infiltration falls short [3]. Understanding the interactions between resin infiltration and subsequent procedures is essential for treatment compatibility.

In-office external bleaching, often employing hydrogen peroxide [24] or carbamide peroxide [13, 30] at varying concentrations, is a common procedure frequently combined with resin infiltration for managing WSLs [13, 24]. Bleaching effectively conceals discolorations by enhancing the overall lightness of enamel and reducing its yellowness [24]. However, bleaching has the potential to compromise the hardness of WSLs enamel by causing additional mineral loss [31]. Pre-bleaching resin infiltration has demonstrated effectiveness in mitigating the reduction in tooth hardness following bleaching [11, 28, 32, 33]. Furthermore, post-bleaching resin infiltration has proven effective in eliminating surface stains and reducing yellowish discoloration, leading to improved teeth whitening outcomes and greater patient satisfaction, as substantiated by various in vitro and clinical studies [11, 28, 32, 33]. Nevertheless, uncertainty persists regarding the optimal treatment sequence and the relative efficacy of combined treatments, due to divergent findings concerning chromatic recovery and durability [24, 28, 33], as well as a lack of data on long-term color stability after exposure to common staining agents.

When minimally invasive methods fail, adhesive restoration becomes a viable alternative. Concerns regarding the potential impact of resin infiltration on bonding processes persist, especially when it penetrates up to 900 μm into WSLs [34], exceeding the typical enamel removal depth of 300–500 μm for veneer restorations [35]. Additionally, limited data is available on the influence of resin infiltration on the bonding performance of WSLs and ceramics in vitro.

This paper aimed to evaluate the aesthetic effect of resin infiltration and bleaching on WSLs and the impact of resin infiltration on the ceramic adhesive properties of WSLs. The first null hypothesis (H0) was that there would be no significant difference in the short-term or long-term effect of chromatic recovery of WSLs when treated with post-bleaching resin infiltration, pre-bleaching resin infiltration, or resin infiltration alone. The second null hypothesis (H0) was that there would be no significant difference in the shear bonding strength, failure pattern, or microleakage depth between WSLs treated with or without resin infiltration.

Materials and methods

This research project (Ref. number: SH9H-2022-TK148-1) was approved by the research ethics committee of the Shanghai Ninth Hospital in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration as revised in 2000.

Specimens collection and preparation

One hundred and fifty bovine incisors from a slaughterhouse were prepared by removing the pulp using a low-speed handpiece and burs, cleaning the pulp cavities, and filling with wax. Subsequently, the teeth were embedded in acrylic resin. The enamel surfaces were polished using 800, 1000, 1200, and 2400 grit silicon carbide paper. A 6 × 6 mm2 section of enamel surface on each specimen was retained for future use, while the surrounding enamel was coated with two layers of color-free, acid-resistant nail varnish (Nail Enamel, Revlon, Oxford, England) to ensure precise dimensions [14].

The sample size was calculated using G*Power software (3.0.10, Christian-Albrechts-Universitat, Kiel, Germany) based on the results based on a pilot study. Nine teeth per group in each experiment were required to have an 99% chance of detecting as significant at the 5% level (2-sided test), with a minimum detectable difference in means of 5.35 and expected standard deviation of 3.8. To compensate possible losses, the sample size was added 10%, resulting in 10 teeth per group [36].

To induce the formation of WSLs on the labial surfaces of the enamel, the specimens were immersed in a demineralization solution (2.2 mM CaCl2, 2.2 mM NaHPO4, 50 mM acetic acid, pH adjusted to 4.4 with 1 M NaOH) for 96 h at 37 °C, with daily changes to the solution [37, 38].

Experimental design of the study

The study design and the materials used are presented in Fig. 1; Table 1.

The impact of resin infiltration on bleaching was analyzed in 3 WSL groups at different treatment stages (n = 30): Group Bl-R (post-bleaching resin infiltration), Group R-Bl (pre-bleaching resin infiltration), and Group R (resin infiltration alone).

The mechanical effect of resin infiltration on ceramic bonding were analyzed in 3 groups (n = 20): the control (Ctrl), Bo (bonding), and R-Bo (pre-bonding resin infiltration) groups.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study design

Full size image
Table 1 Materials used
Full size table

Resin infiltration application

Using the Icon Treatment Set (Vestibular, DMG, Hamburg, Germany), Icon-Etch (15% hydrochloric acid) was applied for 2 min using the provided kit tips. It was left in place for 3 min, then rinsed for 30 s and dried with oil-and-water-free air. Icon-Dry (ethanol) was injected and held for 30 s before air-drying. Subsequently, Icon-infiltrant was applied to the surface, and any excess infiltrant was removed after being absorbed for 3 min. The teeth were subjected to a 40-s light curing process (Bluephase G4 [high power mode], Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) using a tip with a diameter of 4 mm, an intensity of 1200 mW/cm2, and a distance of 4 mm. The distance was maintained consistent with a customized stand for the light curing device. The Infiltrant was once again applied to the surface for 1 min and then subjected to another 40-s light curing process. Following completion, the specimen was immersed in deionized water for 1 day before measurement [33]. All materials were applied according to their manufactures’ instructions.

In-office bleaching treatment

An Opalescence Teeth Whitening System (Boost in-office Whitening, Ultradent, South Jordan, America) with 40% hydrogen peroxide was used in the bleaching treatment. The Opalescence Boost was mixed, and the delivery head was installed. Bleaching gel was applied evenly to a thickness of 0.5–1 mm, held for 20 min, and removed; this process was repeated twice. After being rinsed for 1 min, the specimen was immersed in deionized water for 1 day before measurement [33]. All materials were applied according to their manufactures’ instructions.

Thermocycling test

After demineralization, ten specimens from each group of specimens were placed in a thermocycler (TC-501; Weier, Suzhou, China) with a temperature control setting of 55 °C on one side and 5 °C on the other. The dwell time was 15 s, and the transition time was 5 s. A total of 5000 cycles were performed to simulate one year of tooth aging [32].

Staining test

After treatment, twenty specimens from each group of specimens were randomized and immersed in cola (n = 10) or red wine (n = 10) for 4 h daily for 7 days to mimic anti-exogenous recoloration [20]. Color measurement was conducted on 0, 3 and 7 days after staining.

Color measurement

The specimens were positioned on a spectrophotometer (MetaVue VS3200, X-Rite, Grand Rapids, America) for color comparison at different time points: T0 (baseline), T1 (after demineralization), T2 (after treatment), T3 (after thermocycling), as well as 0, 3 and 7 days after staining. A built-in calibration white board was utilized for color correction, and Color iQC (v10, X-Rite, Grand Rapids, America) was employed to analyze the L* (Luminosity, lightness), a* (red-green axis), and b* (yellow-blue axis) values using the International Illumination Commission (Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage, CIE) detection method [39]. Each specimen underwent three repeated measurements. The overall color difference ΔE was calculated by using \(\varDelta \text{E}={\left[{\left({\text{L}}_{Tx}-{\text{L}}_{\text{T}0}\right)}^{2}+{\left({\text{a}}_{\text{T}\text{x}}-{\text{a}}_{\text{T}0}\right)}^{2}+{\left({\text{b}}_{\text{T}\text{x}}-{\text{b}}_{\text{T}0}\right)}^{2}\right]}^{1/2}\). For each L*, a*, and b* value, the absolute value of the color difference was calculated, for instance, \(|\varDelta {L}^{*}|=|{L}_{Tx}-{L}_{T0}|\).

Surface roughness measurement

The specimens were tested on a contact surface roughness meter (MAHR M1, Dailyaid, Beijing, China) at T0, T1, T2, and T3. All the specimens were measured three times, and the arithmetic mean (Ra) was calculated.

Surface microhardness measurement

The specimens were tested on a surface microhardness meter (HXD-1000TMC, Taiming, Shanghai, China) at T0, T1, T2, and T3. The test surface was positioned parallel to the ground, while the loading head maintained perpendicular alignment. The indenter was pressed against the specimen with a 25 g load for 15 s [40]. Three points were randomly selected, with the condition that the distance between any two spots should not exceed 50 μm. The mean value of the three tested points was recorded.

Fabrication of ceramic blocks

Ceramic blocks (IPS e.max CAD C14, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) were cut into dimensions of 5 × 5 mm2 with a thickness of 2 mm (± 0.01 mm) [41]. After sintering, the ceramic blocks were polished using silicon carbide abrasive paper with grit sizes of 800, 1000, 1200, and 2400. They were subsequently cleaned in an ultrasonic bath (SN-QX-13, Pushang, Shanghai, China) for 5 min to remove surface contaminants [42].

Bonding procedures

The ceramic blocks underwent the following bonding procedures: Etching with 37% hydrofluoric acid (IPS Ceramic Etching gel, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) for 2 min. Rinsing and ultrasonic cleaning (SN-QX-13, Pushang, Shanghai, China) for 3 min. Coating with a silane coupling agent (Monobond Plus, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) followed by drying with oil-free air. Etching of the enamel from Group Ctrl, Bo and R-Bo with a gel containing 37% phosphoric acid (Eco-Etch, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) for 20 s, followed by a 10-s wash and gentle air-drying for 10 s. Application of primer (Syntac Primer, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) to the enamel for 15 s. Application of a bonding agent (Syntac adhesive, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) for 10 s, followed by another bonding agent (Heliobond, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) for 10 s. Bonding of blocks and specimens using dual-curing resin adhesive (Variolink N, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), pressed with a 500 g weight and cured with light irradiation for 20 s on each side. All materials were applied according to their manufactures’ instructions. After bonding, all specimens underwent thermocycling as detailed in Sect. Thermocycling test.

Shear bonding test

Ten bonding specimens were tested on a universal testing machine (EZ20, LLOYD, Fareham, England). A knife-edged attachment was used, positioned parallel to the bonding interface and as close as possible to the bonding surface. The initial force of the head was 0.5 N, and the rate of descent until failure was 0.5 mm/min [43]. The maximum load F upon failure was recorded, and the shear bonding strength P was determined by dividing F by S, where S was the bonding area (25 mm2).

Failure pattern analysis

After completion of the shear bonding strength test, the debonded areas were observed under a stereomicroscope (×20) (Discovery. V12, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) [44]. Failure patterns were classified into three categories [44, 45]:

  1. 1.

    Adhesive failure: The bond breaks inside the teeth or ceramic.

  2. 2.

    Cohesive failure: The bond breaks between the ceramic and the adhesive or between the body and the adhesive.

  3. 3.

    Mixed failure: Both cohesive and cohesive failure occurred.

Marginal microleakage depth

Five specimens were randomly selected from Group Ctrl, Bo, and R-Bo. They were placed in a 2% methylene blue solution at 37 °C for 24 h [46]. Afterward, they were rinsed under running water, subjected to ultrasonic cleaning (SN-QX-13, Pushang, Shanghai, China) for 1 min, dried using ethanol, and embedded in acrylic resin. The specimens were then horizontally sectioned in a mesio-distal direction using an automatic micro-cutting machine (MECATOME T215, Pressi, Servon, France), resulting in three sections (each 1.5 mm thick) obtained from each specimen. The extent of methylene blue dye penetration between enamel and ceramic blocks was examined using a stereomicroscope (×20) (Discovery.V12, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), and the length of dye leakage was recorded.

SEM observation

Five specimens were randomly chosen from Group Ctrl, Bo, and R-Bo for electron microscopy at magnifications of ×2000 and ×5000 (Mira 3 XH, Tescan, Brno, Czech) [47]. These specimens, each sliced to a thickness of 1 mm with an automatic micro-cutting machine (MECATOME T215, Pressi, Servon, France),, were ultrasonically cleaned for 1 min and dried using ethanol. A 5 nm-thick gold nanoparticle thin film was evenly sprayed onto the specimens (Q150T ES PLUS, Quorum, East Sussex, England). The cross-section was then examined, and representative regions were selected for observation.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism (9.0, GraphPad Software, Santiago, America) was used to process the data. The data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The Tukey test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for comparisons with the following parameters: significance level: 0.05; confidence interval: 95%; power: 80%. NS indicates no statistical significance; *, **, and *** indicate that there were statistically significant differences.

Results

Modeling

Compared with those of healthy enamel (T0), the WSL enamel (T1) exhibited notable differences in color (Fig. S1A, Fig. S1B, Fig. S1C), surface roughness (Fig. S2A) and microhardness (Fig. S2B), which was consistent with the findings of previous studies [21, 28] and confirmed the efficacy of our WSL modeling method.

Effects of resin infiltration and bleaching on WSLs

The aesthetic goal of WSLs is to ensure that the affected area visually appears similar to the surrounding healthy enamel. Visual color dissimilarities are reflected by the L*, a*, and b* values, as well as their color differences (ΔE) [48]. If ΔE<3.7, the color difference is thought to be imperceptible to human eyes [48].

All three groups of treated enamel (T2) exhibited masking effect, with |ΔL|, |Δa |, |Δb|, and ΔE values all lower than those of WSL enamel (T1) (Fig. S1A, Fig. S1B, Fig. S1C, Fig. S1D), which implied decreased color deviation from baseline (T0). Overall, the R-Bl group presented the highest |ΔLT2| (5.626), |Δa T2| (1.094) and |Δb T2| (3.775) values and the highest ΔET2 (7.212), indicating the worst masking ability (Table 2). The R group presented the lowest |ΔL T2| (0.06) and |Δb T2| (0.578) (Table 2). The Bl-R group presented the lowest |Δa T2| (0.006), as well as the lowest ΔE T2 (5.829) (Table 2). Additionally, the Bl-R group had significantly greater L* values (P < 0.05) and lower b* values (P < 0.05) at T2 compared to T0 (Fig. S1A, Fig. S1C), indicating greater brightness and lower yellowness, providing a camouflage effect that made the whiteness of the lesion less visible [13] and potentially improving patient satisfaction.

Color stability should also be taken into consideration. Previous studies have measured material aging [49] and exposure to coloring agents [33] in the oral environment when assessing aesthetic outcomes. Before (T2) and after (T3) thermocycling, the average ΔE value only slightly changed in all three groups (Table 2; Fig. S1D). However, cola staining had a significant time-dependent impact on the R-Bl group (P < 0.05) and the R group (P < 0.05) (Table 3; Fig. S1E; Fig. S1F). The susceptibility to staining might be explained by surface properties [50]. The R-Bl group had the highest surface roughness (0.653 ± 0.087 μm) at T2, followed by the R group (0.487 ± 0.118 μm) and the Bl-R group (0.453 ± 0.105 μm) (Table 4; Fig. S2A). Consequently, the Bl-R group was proven to have the best durability.

Table 2 Differences in chromatic changes (△L, △a, △b, △E) of WSLs between the various groups (n = 10)
Full size table
Table 3 Differences in chromatic visibility of WSLs (△E) between the various groups after staining (n = 10)
Full size table
Table 4 Differences in surface roughness and surface microhardness between the various groups (n = 10)
Full size table

In addition to aesthetic considerations, microhardness was measured. Vickers hardness analysis revealed that the R group (260.570 ± 18.642 VHN) (P > 0.05) and Bl-R (P < 0.05) group (246.290 ± 34.699 VHN) exhibited greater microhardness than the R-Bl group (204.880 ± 44.102 VHN) at T2 (Table 4; Fig. S2B), while no significant difference was observed among the three groups at T3 (P > 0.05) (Table 4).

Mechanical effect of resin infiltration and ceramic bonding bleaching on WSLs

Fig. 2
figure 2

The effect of resin infiltration on the adhesive properties of WSLs. (A) The shear bonding strength of the Ctrl group, Bo group, and R-Bo group (n = 10). (B) Failure pattern analysis of the Ctrl group, D group, and DR group (n = 10). (C) The microleakage depth of the Ctrl group, Bo group, and R-Bo group (n = 15). (D) Representative SEM images of the Ctrl group, D group, and DR group (2000×, scale bar = 20 μm; 5000×, scale bar = 10 μm). The B zone: bonding agent; the E zone: enamel. *P < 0.01, **P < 0.001

Full size image

Teeth preparation cannot eliminate the infiltrant in the enamel affected by WSLs, which may raise concerns about the treatment of resin-infiltrated teeth with ceramic veneers, as the quality of bonding is crucial. To evaluate changes in mechanical bonding properties following resin infiltration, shear bonding values were measured for three groups: Ctrl group (sound enamel), Bo group, and R-Bo group. The shear bonding strength (SBS) of the R-Bo group (19.18 ± 1.97 MPa) was significantly higher than that of the Ctrl group (9.57 ± 2.89 MPa) (P < 0.05), but it was significantly lower than that of the Bo group (12.26 ± 1.55 MPa) (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2A). This difference may be explained by the porous structure of the WSLs assisting in the formation of mechanical interlock, thus affecting bonding [51]. Nevertheless, resin infiltration did not decrease the shear bonding strength compared to that of sound enamel. In terms of failure patterns, the R-Bo group better mimicked the sound enamel than the Bo group(Fig. 2B). Like in previous studies [52], we found that sound enamel was prone to adhesive failure (90%), while those of the R-Bo group and the Bo group were 30% and 20%, respectively.

The failure to achieve tight marginal sealing is a primary cause of ceramic veneer failure [53, 54]. The micro-structure of the bonding interface was analyzed through micro-leakage testing and SEM observation. In the R-Bo group, the average length of the methylene blue micro-leakage line was 188.46 ± 93.12 μm, which was close to that of the Ctrl group (177.53 ± 71.36) (P > 0.05), but significantly lower than that of the Bo group (2393.54 ± 1158.13) (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2C). Electron microscopy observations further revealed a marginal closure in the R-Bo group that resembled sound enamel and exhibited zero pores or vacuoles between the enamel-ceramic interface. This indicates better marginal sealing compared to the porous and discontinuous Bo group, which is advantageous for the long-term prevention of caries and debonding [23, 54].

Discussion

In this in vitro study, we assessed the aesthetic and mechanical ramifications of resin infiltration on demineralized bovine teeth. The demineralization protocol adhered to the methodology outlined by Kumar et al. [38] and resulted in a chromatic increase in the L* value and a decrease in the a* and b* values, as well as, mechanically, an increase in surface roughness and a decrease in microhardness. These findings verify the efficacy of the WSL model [28]. The use of human teeth of variable age and environmental exposure, as well as curved surfaces, presents challenges for achieving uniform treatment effect. Bovine teeth, which are flat and relatively consistent, serve as a reliable substitute due to their close chemical similarity to human teeth, particularly in comparison to porcine and ovine teeth [55]. They exhibit similar Ca/P ratios after remineralization and demineralization processes [56]. Bovine and human teeth also show no significant differences in mineral loss, lesion depth, or biofilm formation under cariogenic condition [57, 58], nor in the analysis of failure patterns. This supports the widespread adoption of bovine teeth in bonding evaluations [59, 60].

Remineralization, alongside resin infiltration, is a frequently employed, minimally invasive approach for treating WSLs [61]. This method utilizes various agents, including fluoride, nano-hydroxyapatite, bioactive glass, CPP-ACP, and modified infiltrative resins [62, 63], enhancing enamel strength and reducing tooth sensitivity [64], especially in teeth that are bleached or about to be bleached [65]. However, the effectiveness of this treatment depends on patient adherence, and WSLs may continue to exist despite thorough oral hygiene and diet management [66]. Clinical studies have shown that resin infiltration is more effective in halting caries progression than fluoride varnish in both primary and permanent teeth [67,68,69]. Additionally, a meta-analysis points out that the positive camouflaging effects of fluoride varnish cannot compete to resin infiltration, meanwhile might take up to six months, in contrast to the immediate masking effect of resin infiltration [70].

Thus, resin infiltration has been introduced to stop the advancement of non-cavitated lesions, conceal demineralized lesions, and preserve the natural translucency of enamel [71]. It can fully obscure the opaque color of inactive WSLs and partly conceal the appearance of moderate to severe WSLs reaching deep dentine [72]. The commercial ICON system (DMG, Hamburg, Germany) uses a three-step method: Icon-Etch (15% hydrochloric acid) for removing the superficial uneven layer, Icon-Dry (ethanol) to reduce the viscosity of the infiltrant and remove residual moisture, and Icon-Infiltrant to permeate porosities through capillary action [1].

Regarding modeling, acid etching was used to replicate the chromatic and mechanical characteristics typical of WSLs [37]. To investigate the impact of resin infiltration on bleaching, three groups of WSL enamel were treated with post-bleaching resin infiltration, pre-bleaching resin infiltration, or resin infiltration alone. Each specimen was immersed in deionized water for 24 h to remove any residual substances, in line with the evidence suggesting that storage times ranging from 24 h to 14 days do not significantly alter the mechanical properties of the specimens [73]. In the group where resin infiltration was performed before bleaching, the interval between resin infiltration and bleaching was 1 day [73]. Conversely, in the group receiving resin infiltration after bleaching, the procedure was postponed for 14 days following bleaching to counteract the inhibitory effect of peroxide on resin polymerization [73].

This study’s investigation into chromatic changes in WSLs under different sequences of resin infiltration and bleaching has shed light on effective treatment protocols, a topic not thoroughly explored in prior research. While Yeslam HE et al. [33] supported resin infiltration prior to bleaching in vitro and Christoph M. Schoppmeier et al. [24] recommended post-bleaching infiltration in clinical settings, Al-Shaheen Youssef et al. [28] found no significant chromatic differences between these sequences, questioning the assumption of sequence-dependent effectiveness. In contrast, our results demonstrate that both pre- and post-bleaching resin infiltration significantly improve immediate color matching, as evidenced by reduced deviation of L*, a* and b* values compared to baseline. However, the longevity of aesthetic results is often undermined by factors such as water absorption by TEDGMA, shrinkage due to polymerization in low-filler resins, and external conditions like thermal and pH cycling, which can deteriorate both resin and enamel. This leads to potential issues like discoloration, plaque build-up, and secondary caries [1, 74]. To evaluate color stability, oral conditions were simulated using thermocycling and staining methods. Post-thermocycling analyses revealed no notable chromatic changes; however, only specimens from the post-bleaching resin infiltration group maintained long-term color stability after staining, which could be attributed to their lower surface roughness [50]. Clinically, to enhance durability, polishing procedures and oral hygiene instruction (OHI) are advised [71].

The outcomes of the present study showed that resin infiltration alone and bleaching prior to resin infiltration significantly increased the surface microhardness of WSLs compared with bleaching after resin infiltration. As ICON treatment progresses during the finishing procedure, there is an increase in surface microhardness. This increase can be attributed to the relatively uniform formation of resin-hydroxyapatite complexes, which fill the voids and spaces in the demineralized zone [20]. In contrast, when bleaching is used as a finishing procedure, enamel composition undergoes significant modification due to the removal of calcium and phosphate, as suggested by Ergucu Z et al. [75]. This results in compromised hardness. The current findings also suggest that the microhardness of negatively affected bleached WSLs can be restored by the resin infiltrant, aligning with the in vivo observations of Horuztepe SA et al. [21].

Thus, we partially refuted the first null hypothesis, advocating post-bleaching resin infiltration as an efficacious approach for the aesthetic management of WSLs, particularly for lesions affecting shallow dentine [72].

When WSLs exceed the depth of dentine, incomplete coverage of resin infiltration might occur, yielding insufficient aesthetic outcomes [72, 76]. Lesions of this nature are often only partially hidden, remaining visible to clinical observation [72]. This necessitates more intensive restorative methods [72], such as direct resin composite, indirect ceramic veneers, and complete coverage crowns [77]. Porcelain laminate veneers are particularly favored due to their balance between conservation and aesthetic results, making them a common selection for treating enamel with unsuccessful infiltration in WSLs.

Furthermore, this research evaluated the effect of resin infiltration on the shear bonding strength (SBS) of porcelain discs to determine the clinical applicability of post-infiltration ceramic bonding. Over the past two decades, the interface between dental ceramic and resin cement has undergone extensive testing through various methodologies. Shear bonding tests, which assess the maximum or failure load before rupture [78], have been a mainstay in studies of bonding strength related to WSLs, particularly those focusing on orthodontic adhesives. While Naidu E et al. [79] observed that resin infiltration not only maintained but also improved the SBS of orthodontic resin cements, Montasser MA et al. [80] found no significant change. To the best of our knowledge, the SBS of porcelain adhesives on WSLs pre-treated with ICON has not been previously explored. Our results indicate that resin infiltration does not adversely affect SBS when using the Variolink N bonding system. An increased occurrence of adhesive failure in failure pattern analysis suggests that resin infiltration may actually enhance the bonding characteristics of ceramic bonding agents. Clinically, this means that resin infiltration is unlikely to increase the risk of marginal interface rupture, which could lead to infiltration of oral fluids and subsequent secondary caries [81, 82].

We also investigated the success and failure of ceramic restoration by examining microleakage at the enamel-ceramic interface post-thermocycling utilizing the dye penetration method with 2% methylene blue dye [83]. Previous studies have suggested that methylene blue penetrates the deepest layer in WSLs (the inner half of enamel or outer half of dentin), secondarily through sound enamel (the outer half of the enamel), and penetrates the most shallow layer in infiltrant-treated WLSs (no penetration or the inner half of enamel) [84]. Like Klaisiri A et al. [84] and Lee J et al. [85], we found that dye penetration depth was reduced more than tenfold in resin-infiltrated WSLs compared to that in WSLs. However, unlike in previous studies, we found no significant difference in microleakage between sound enamel and resin-infiltrated WSLs [84]. Nevertheless, resin infiltration reversed the deficiencies in the integrity of the hydroxyapatite latticework, which in turn prevented microleakage.

Representative SEM micrographs illustrating the microchanges on the WSL enamel surface after ceramic bonding. Owda R et al.[97] observed the rough surface and enlarged interprismatic space characteristic of enamel in WSLs. Our study demonstrated a shift from this rough, demineralized enamel to a more uniform, resin-infiltrated surface, aligning with findings by Horuztepe SA et al. [86]. The improvement in enamel margin continuity with ICON and Syntac adhesives, previously identified by Körner P et al. [87] at ×200 magnification, was further explored in our study at higher magnifications (×2000 and ×5000). A distinct contrast was noted in the WSLs bonding interface, with compromised adhesive polymerization, while the infiltrated WSLs bonding interface showed a seamless transition and uniform integration, indicating enhanced bonding efficiency and potential for better clinical outcomes.

Therefore, the second null hypothesis was partially rejected. Our findings suggest that resin infiltration does not adversely affect bonding integrity and is effective in reducing microleakage in WSLs.

This study highlights the combined benefits of various treatments with resin infiltration for managing WSLs. However, it is important to acknowledge certain limitations. The use of bovine teeth, despite their structural resemblance to human teeth, might result in faster acid and resin penetration [88] than in human enamel. This is due to their larger crystal size, smaller prism diameters, more interprismatic substance, and increased porosity [89]. Still, qualitative findings in the current study can be directly applied in human conditions. Additionally, the controlled laboratory setting of this in vitro study does not entirely replicate the complex environment of the oral cavity. Consequently, in-vivo experiments are necessary to validate the effectiveness of these combined treatment approaches for WSLs.

Conclusions

Within the limitations of in vitro study, the following conclusions can be drawn:

Post-bleaching resin infiltration proved to be advantageous in the aesthetic treatment of WSLs, leading to greater brightness and lower yellowness both in short-term and long-term. Furthermore, it did not compromise the bond strength of ceramics to WSLs but did reduce the microleakage depth and enhance marginal sealing.

Based on these findings, the sequenced treatment of post-bleaching resin infiltration is recommended, and resin infiltration before ceramic bonding is deemed viable in clinical practice.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

WSLs:

White Spot Lesions

SBS:

shear bonding strength

References

  1. Araújo GSA, Naufel FS, Alonso RCB, Lima DaNL, Puppin-Rontani RM. Influence of staining solution and bleaching on Color Stability of Resin used for Caries Infiltration. Oper Dent. 2015;40:E250–256. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-290-L.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilbert K, Joseph R, Vo A, Patel T, Chaudhry S, Nguyen U, Trevor A, Robinson E, Campbell M, McLennan J, Houran F, Wong T, Flann K, Wages M, Palmer EA, Peterson J, Engle J, Maier T, Machida CA. Children with severe early childhood caries: Streptococci genetic strains within carious and white spot lesions. J Oral Microbiol. 2014;6. https://doi.org/10.3402/jom.v6.25805.

  3. Demirekin ZB, Turkaslan S. Laminate veneer ceramics in aesthetic rehabilitation of teeth with fluorosis: a 10-year follow-up study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02079-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Seow WK. Developmental defects of enamel and dentine: challenges for basic science research and clinical management. Aust Dent J 59 Suppl. 2014;1143–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12104.

  5. Khoroushi M, Kachuie M. Prevention and Treatment of White Spot lesions in Orthodontic patients. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017;8:11–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_216_17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Behrouzi P, Heshmat H, Hoorizad Ganjkar M, Tabatabaei SF, Kharazifard MJ. Effect of two methods of remineralization and Resin Infiltration on Surface hardness of Artificially Induced Enamel lesions. J Dent (Shiraz). 2020;21:12–7. https://doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.77864.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Campos PH, Gimenez T, Rocha RS, Caneppele TMF, Guaré RO, Lussi A, Bresciani E, Diniz MB. Prevalence of White Spot caries lesions in primary teeth in Preschool children: systematic review and Meta-analysis. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2022;18:33–46. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573396317666211202090657.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Knösel M, Klang E, Helms H-J, Wiechmann D. Occurrence and severity of enamel decalcification adjacent to bracket bases and sub-bracket lesions during orthodontic treatment with two different lingual appliances. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:485–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khalaf K. Factors affecting the formation, severity and location of White Spot lesions during Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2014;5:e4. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2014.5104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sundararaj D, Venkatachalapathy S, Tandon A, Pereira A. Critical evaluation of incidence and prevalence of white spot lesions during fixed orthodontic appliance treatment: a meta-analysis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5:433–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.167719.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Saxena P, Grewal MS, Agarwal P, Kaur G, Verma J, Chhikara V. Clinical efficacy of Resin infiltration technique alone or in combination with Micro Abrasion and in-Office bleaching in adults with mild-to-moderate fluorosis stains. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13:301–S305. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_795_20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Azzahim L, Chala S, Abdallaoui F. [Role of enamel microabrasion associated with external bleaching in the management of patients with dental fluorosis]. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;34:72. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.34.72.20401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim Y, Son HH, Yi K, Ahn JS, Chang J. Bleaching effects on Color, Chemical, and Mechanical properties of White Spot lesions. Oper Dent. 2016;41:318–26. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-015-L.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Remineralization effect of CPP-ACP. and fluoride for white spot lesions in vitro - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25260438/. Accessed 23 Jan 2024.

  15. Shen P, McKeever A, Walker GD, Yuan Y, Reynolds C, Fernando JR, Chen Y-Y, MacRae CM, Schneider P, Reynolds EC. Remineralization and fluoride uptake of white spot lesions under dental varnishes. Aust Dent J. 2020;65:278–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12787.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salomão PMA, Comar LP, Buzalaf MAR, Magalhães AC. In situ remineralisation response of different artificial caries-like enamel lesions to home-care and professional fluoride treatments. BMC Oral Health. 2016;16:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0160-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Neres ÉY, Moda MD, Chiba EK, Briso A, Pessan JP, Fagundes TC. Microhardness and Roughness of Infiltrated White Spot lesions submitted to different challenges. Oper Dent. 2017;42:428–35. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-144-L.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wierichs RJ, Langer F, Kobbe C, Abou-Ayash B, Esteves-Oliveira M, Wolf M, Knaup I, Meyer-Lueckel H. Aesthetic caries infiltration - long-term masking efficacy after 6 years. J Dent. 2023;132:104474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Enan ET, Aref NS, Hammad SM. Resistance of resin-infiltrated enamel to surface changes in response to acidic challenge. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31:353–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao X, Ren Y-F. Surface properties and Color Stability of Resin-Infiltrated Enamel Lesions. Oper Dent. 2016;41:617–26. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-319-L.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Horuztepe SA, Baseren M. Effect of resin infiltration on the color and microhardness of bleached white-spot lesions in bovine enamel (an in vitro study). J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29:378–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kannan A, Padmanabhan S. Comparative evaluation of Icon® resin infiltration and Clinpro™ XT Varnish on colour and fluorescence changes of white spot lesions: a randomized controlled trial. Prog Orthod. 2019;20:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0276-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L, Fromentin O. A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Rehabil. 2014;41:853–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schoppmeier CM, Derman SHM, Noack MJ, Wicht MJ. Power bleaching enhances resin infiltration masking effect of dental fluorosis. A randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2018;79:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.10.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fluorescence properties of demineralized. enamel after resin infiltration and dental bleaching - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30834731/. Accessed 25 Jan 2024.

  26. Perdigão J. Resin infiltration of enamel white spot lesions: an ultramorphological analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32:317–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Soveral M, Machado V, Botelho J, Mendes JJ, Manso C. Effect of Resin Infiltration on Enamel: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Funct Biomater. 2021;12:48. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb12030048.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Youssef A-S, Covell DA, Makowka S, Gailey A, Dunford RG, Al-Jewair T, Haraszthy VI. Comparison of bleaching effects when applied to white-spot lesions before or after resin infiltration: an in vitro study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2022;153:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2021.07.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sekundo C, Frese C. Underlying Resin Infiltration and Direct Composite veneers for the treatment of severe white color alterations of the Enamel: Case Report and 13-Month Follow-Up. Oper Dent. 2020;45:10–8. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-242-L.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. da Freiria ACB, Ortiz MIG, de Sobral DFS, Aguiar FHB, Lima DANL. Nano-hydroxyapatite-induced remineralization of artificial white spot lesions after bleaching treatment with 10% carbamide peroxide. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34:1290–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cavalli V, Rosa DA, da, Silva DP da, Kury M, Liporoni PCS, Soares LES, Martins AA. (2018) Effects of experimental bleaching agents on the mineral content of sound and demineralized enamels. J Appl Oral Sci 26:e20170589. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0589.

  32. Alverson BW, Capehart KL, Babb CS, Romero MF. Esthetic management of white spot lesions by using minimal intervention techniques of bleaching and resin infiltration: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126:455–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yeslam HE, AlZahrani SJ. Time-dependent effect of intense capsule-coffee and bleaching on the color of resin-infiltrated enamel white spot lesions: an in vitro study. PeerJ. 2022;10:e14135. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ibrahim DFA, Venkiteswaran A, Hasmun NN. The penetration depth of Resin Infiltration into Enamel: a systematic review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2023;13:194–207. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_36_23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Miyagi H, Oki K, Tsukiyama Y, Ayukawa Y, Koyano K. Assessment of the Accuracy in measuring the Enamel thickness of Maxillary incisors with Optical Coherence Tomography. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12:1634. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Carneiro G, Monteiro D, Rodrigues M, Yamauti M, Moreira A, Magalhães C. Color change of the bleached enamel treated with calcium silicate- sodium phosphate-sodium monofluorophosphate-based system. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11:e353–9. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.55286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Diniz AC, Bauer J, Veloso S do, AR, Abreu-Pereira CA, Carvalho CN, Leitão TJ, Firoozmand LM, Maia-Filho EM. (2023) Effect of Bioactive Filler Addition on the Mechanical and Biological Properties of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer. Materials (Basel) 16:1765. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051765.

  38. Kumar VLN, Itthagarun A, King NM. The effect of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on remineralization of artificial caries-like lesions: an in vitro study. Aust Dent J. 2008;53:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.00006.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Joiner A, Luo W. Tooth colour and whiteness: a review. J Dent. 2017;67S:3–S10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cecchin D, Farina AP, Vidal C, Bedran-Russo AK. A novel enamel and dentin etching protocol using α-hydroxy glycolic acid: Surface Property, Etching Pattern, and Bond Strength studies. Oper Dent. 2018;43:101–10. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-136-L.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee SJ, Cheong CW, Wright RF, Chang BM. Bond strength of the porcelain repair system to all-ceramic copings and porcelain. J Prosthodont. 2014;23:112–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cuzic C, Jivanescu A, Negru RM, Hulka I, Rominu M. The influence of Hydrofluoric Acid temperature and application technique on ceramic surface texture and Shear Bond Strength of an Adhesive Cement. Mater (Basel). 2023;16:4303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16124303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bond Strength of Metallic or. Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets to Enamel, Acrylic, or Porcelain Surfaces - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33213042/. Accessed 22 Jan 2024.

  44. Abdou A, Hussein N, Kusumasari C, Abo-Alazm EA, Rizk A. Alumina and glass-bead blasting effect on bond strength of zirconia using 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) containing self-adhesive resin cement and primers. Sci Rep. 2023;13:19127. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46548-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Ali A, Takagaki T, Nikaido T, Abdou A, Tagami J. Influence of Ambient Air and different surface treatments on the Bonding performance of a CAD/CAM Composite Block. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20:317–24. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a40993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Microleakage microgap. Jan, and shear bond strength of an infiltrant for pit and fissure sealing - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37229157/. Accessed 22 2024.

  47. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Teixeira EC, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M, Latta MA. Fatigue bond strength of dental adhesive systems: historical background of test methodology, clinical considerations and future perspectives. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2022;58:193–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2022.05.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Yuan H, Li J, Chen L, Cheng L, Cannon RD, Mei L. Esthetic comparison of white-spot lesion treatment modalities using spectrometry and fluorescence. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:343–9. https://doi.org/10.2319/032113-232.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Silva J, Engler MLPD, Baumgardt Barbosa Lima R, Jesús Suarez M, Guy Oliver Salomon J-P, Maziero Volpato CA. Color stability of a resin nanoceramic after surface treatments, adhesive cementation, and thermal aging. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127:498e1. 498.e8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Surface Roughness of Initial Enamel Caries Lesions in Human Teeth After. Resin Infiltration - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27733877/. Accessed 22 Jan 2024.

  51. Nuryawan A, Abdullah CK, Hazwan CM, Olaiya NG, Yahya EB, Risnasari I, Masruchin N, Baharudin MS, Khalid H, Abdul Khalil HPS. Enhancement of Oil Palm Waste Nanoparticles on the properties and characterization of Hybrid Plywood biocomposites. Polym (Basel). 2020;12:1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12051007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ziotti IR, Paschoini VL, Corona SAM, Souza-Gabriel AE. Chitosan-induced biomodification on demineralized dentin to improve the adhesive interface. Restor Dent Endod. 2022;47:e28. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Baig MR, Qasim SSB, Baskaradoss JK. Marginal and internal fit of porcelain laminate veneers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Morimoto S, Albanesi RB, Sesma N, Agra CM, Braga MM. Main clinical outcomes of Feldspathic Porcelain and Glass-Ceramic Laminate veneers: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of Survival and Complication Rates. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29:38–49. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Teruel J, de Alcolea D, Hernández A, Ruiz A AJO. Comparison of chemical composition of enamel and dentine in human, bovine, porcine and ovine teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 2015;60:768–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.01.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tressel JT, Abdelaziz M, Fried D. Dynamic SWIR imaging near the 1950-nm water absorption band for caries lesion diagnosis. J Biomed Opt. 2021;26:056006. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.5.056006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Jeon D-M, An J-S, Lim B-S, Ahn S-J. Orthodontic bonding procedures significantly influence biofilm composition. Prog Orthod. 2020;21:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-020-00314-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Roser CJ, Rückschloß T, Zenthöfer A, Rammelsberg P, Lux CJ, Rues S. Orthodontic shear bond strength and ultimate load tests of CAD/CAM produced artificial teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26:7149–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04676-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Britto FAR, Lucato AS, Valdrighi HC, Vedovello SAS. Influence of bleaching and desensitizing gel on bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Dent Press J Orthod. 2015;20:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.2.049-054.oar.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Chew D, Bennani V, Aarts JM, Chandler N, Gray A, Lowe B. Bonding strengths to porcelain: an in vitro study of ultrasonic and conventional tooth preparation and etching. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22:76–81. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_302_18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Flemming J, Hannig C, Hannig M. Caries Management-the role of surface interactions in De- and remineralization-processes. J Clin Med. 2022;11:7044. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237044.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Orilisi G, Vitiello F, Notarstefano V, Furlani M, Riberti N, Monterubbianesi R, Bellezze T, Campus G, Carrouel F, Orsini G, Putignano A. Multidisciplinary evaluation of the remineralization potential of three fluoride-based toothpastes on natural white spot lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27:7451–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05334-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Singh S, Singh SP, Goyal A, Utreja AK, Jena AK. Effects of various remineralizing agents on the outcome of post-orthodontic white spot lesions (WSLs): a clinical trial. Prog Orthod. 2016;17:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0138-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Enax J, Amaechi BT, Farah R, Liu JA, Schulze zur Wiesche E, Meyer F. Remineralization strategies for Teeth with Molar Incisor hypomineralization (MIH): a Literature Review. Dent J (Basel). 2023;11:80. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj11030080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Gomes MN, Rodrigues FP, Silikas N, Francci CE. Micro-CT and FE-SEM enamel analyses of calcium-based agent application after bleaching. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:961–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2175-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Torres PJ, Phan HT, Bojorquez AK, Garcia-Godoy F, Pinzon LM. Minimally invasive techniques used for Caries Management in Dentistry. A review. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;45:224–32. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4625-45.4.2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Urquhart O, Tampi MP, Pilcher L, Slayton RL, Araujo MWB, Fontana M, Guzmán-Armstrong S, Nascimento MM, Nový BB, Tinanoff N, Weyant RJ, Wolff MS, Young DA, Zero DT, Brignardello-Petersen R, Banfield L, Parikh A, Joshi G, Carrasco-Labra A. Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: systematic review and network Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2019;98:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518800014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Foster Page LA, Beckett D, Ahmadi R, Schwass DR, de la Leon S, Moffat SM, Meldrum A, Thomson WM. Resin Infiltration of Caries in primary molars in a community setting: 24-Month Randomized Controlled Trial findings. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2017;2:287–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/2380084417699400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ammari MM, Jorge RC, Souza IPR, Soviero VM. Efficacy of resin infiltration of proximal caries in primary molars: 1-year follow-up of a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:1355–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2227-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Efficacy of resin infiltration. to mask post-orthodontic or non-post-orthodontic white spot lesions or fluorosis — a systematic review and meta-analysis | Clinical Oral Investigations. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00784-021-03931-7. Accessed 27 Jan 2024.

  71. Dziaruddin N, Zakaria ASI. Resin Infiltration of Non-cavitated Enamel Lesions in Paediatric Dentistry: a narrative review. Child (Basel). 2022;9:1893. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9121893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Abbas BA, Marzouk ES, Zaher AR. Treatment of various degrees of white spot lesions using resin infiltration-in vitro study. Prog Orthod. 2018;19:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0223-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Alsafi AM, Taher NM. Microhardness and surface roughness of resin infiltrated bleached enamel surface using atomic force microscopy: an in vitro study. Saudi Dent J. 2023;35:692–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Cohen-Carneiro F, Pascareli AM, Christino MRC, Vale HF, do, Pontes DG. Color stability of carious incipient lesions located in enamel and treated with resin infiltration or remineralization. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2014;24:277–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Ergucu Z, Yoruk I, Erdoğan A, Boyacıoğlu H, Hill R, Baysan A. The Use of toothpastes containing different formulations of Fluoride and Bioglass on bleached enamel. Mater (Basel). 2023;16:1368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16041368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Schneider H, Park K-J, Rueger C, Ziebolz D, Krause F, Haak R. Imaging resin infiltration into non-cavitated carious lesions by optical coherence tomography. J Dent. 2017;60:94–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.03.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Hosney S, Ercoli C, Dilbone D, Carranza MG, Chochlidakis K. Esthetic and Functional Rehabilitation of an adolescent patient with severe Dental Fluorosis: a clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2022;31:96–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Dinçkal Yanıkoğlu N, Sakarya RE. Test methods used in the evaluation of the structure features of the restorative materials: a literature review. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9:9720–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Naidu E, Stawarczyk B, Tawakoli PN, Attin R, Attin T, Wiegand A. Shear bond strength of orthodontic resins after caries infiltrant preconditioning. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:306–12. https://doi.org/10.2319/052112-409.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Montasser MA, Taha M. Effect of enamel protective agents on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Prog Orthod. 2014;15:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0034-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Labib LM, Nabih SM, Baroudi K. Evaluation of cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored with low shrinkable resin composite (in vitro study). J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5:470–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.167725.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Monteiro RV, Dos Santos DM, Bernardon JK, De Souza GM. Effect of surface treatment on the retention of zirconia crowns to tooth structure after aging. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32:699–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Bilgrami A, Alam MK, Qazi FUR, Maqsood A, Basha S, Ahmed N, Syed KA, Mustafa M, Shrivastava D, Nagarajappa AK, Srivastava KC. An In-Vitro Evaluation of Microleakage in Resin-based restorative materials at different time intervals. Polym (Basel). 2022;14:466. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14030466.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Klaisiri A, Janchum S, Wongsomtakoon K, Sirimanathon P, Krajangta N. Microleakage of resin infiltration in artificial white-spot lesions. J Oral Sci. 2020;62:427–9. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.19-0321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Lee J, Chen J-W, Omar S, Kwon SR, Meharry M. Evaluation of Stain Penetration by beverages in Demineralized Enamel treated with Resin Infiltration. Oper Dent. 2016;41:93–102. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-259-L.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Horuztepe SA, Ergin E, Onen A, Gürgan S. Comparison of Resin Infiltration technique with conventional preventive applications on Occlusal fissures in terms of Chemical Analysis and SEM. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2020;54:382–91. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc54/4/5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Körner P, El Gedaily M, Attin R, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Margin Integrity of Conservative Composite restorations after Resin Infiltration of Demineralized Enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19:483–9. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a39280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. El Meligy OAES, Alamoudi NM, Eldin Ibrahim ST, Felemban OM, Al-Tuwirqi AA. Effect of resin infiltration application on early proximal caries lesions in vitro. J Dent Sci. 2021;16:296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.04.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Spinola MdaS, Moecke SE, Rossi NR, Nakatsuka T, Borges AB, Torres CRG. Efficacy of S-PRG filler containing varnishes on enamel demineralization prevention. Sci Rep. 2020;10:18992. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76127-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82272815), National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases (Shanghai NinthPeople’s Hospital) Oral Medicine Clinical Research Project (NCRCO202332); and State Key Laboratory of Oral Disease Research Open Project (SKLOD20220F01).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jiaen Shu and Yijia Huang contributed equally

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Prosthodontics, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200011, Shanghai, China

    Jiaen Shu, Yijia Huang, Xueying Ma, Zhonghua Duan, Pei Wu, Sijing Chu, Yuqiong Wu & Yuhua Wang

  2. College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Jiaen Shu, Yijia Huang, Xueying Ma, Zhonghua Duan, Pei Wu, Sijing Chu, Yuqiong Wu & Yuhua Wang

  3. National Center for Stomatology, Shanghai, China

    Jiaen Shu, Yijia Huang, Xueying Ma, Zhonghua Duan, Pei Wu, Sijing Chu, Yuqiong Wu & Yuhua Wang

  4. National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China

    Jiaen Shu, Yijia Huang, Xueying Ma, Zhonghua Duan, Pei Wu, Sijing Chu, Yuqiong Wu & Yuhua Wang

  5. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China

    Jiaen Shu, Yijia Huang, Xueying Ma, Zhonghua Duan, Pei Wu, Sijing Chu, Yuqiong Wu & Yuhua Wang

  6. Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China

    Jiaen Shu, Yijia Huang, Xueying Ma, Zhonghua Duan, Pei Wu, Sijing Chu, Yuqiong Wu & Yuhua Wang

Authors
  1. Jiaen Shu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yijia Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xueying Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhonghua Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pei Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sijing Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yuqiong Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yuhua Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.E. Shu, Y.Q. Wu and Y.H. Wang contributed to the study conceptualization. J.E. Shu, X.Y. Ma and S.J. Chu contributed to the methodology and investigation. Y.J. Huang, Z.H. Duan, P. Wu and Y.Q. Wu contributed to the literature survey. J.E. Shu, Y.J. Huang and Y.H. Wang contributed to the data curation, formal analysis, and original draft. J.E. Shu, Y.J. Huang, Y.Q. Wu and Y.H. Wang contributed to the visualization, manuscript editing and review. Y.Q. Wu contributed to the project administration, and Y.H. Wang contributed to the funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuqiong Wu or Yuhua Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research project (Ref. number: SH9H-2022-TK148-1) was approved by the research ethics committee of the Shanghai Ninth Hospital in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration as revised in 2000.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shu, J., Huang, Y., Ma, X. et al. Aesthetic impact of resin infiltration and its mechanical effect on ceramic bonding for white spot lesions. BMC Oral Health 24, 365 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04011-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04011-4

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us