Skip to main content

Oral mucosal lesions in skin diseased patients attending a dermatologic clinic: a cross-sectional study in Sudan



So far there have been no studies focusing on the prevalence of a wide spectrum of oral mucosal lesions (OML) in patients with dermatologic diseases. This is noteworthy as skin lesions are strongly associated with oral lesions and could easily be neglected by dentists. This study aimed to estimate the frequency and socio-behavioural correlates of OML in skin diseased patients attending outpatient's facility of Khartoum Teaching Hospital - Dermatology Clinic, Sudan.


A cross-sectional hospital-based study was conducted in Khartoum from October 2008 to January 2009. A total of 588 patients (mean age 37.2 ± 16 years, 50.3% females) completed an oral examination and a personal interview of which 544 patients (mean age 37.1 ± 15.9 years, 50% females) with confirmed skin disease diagnosis were included for further analyses. OML were recorded using the World Health Organization criteria (WHO). Biopsy and smear were used as adjuvant techniques for confirmation. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (Version 15.0.1). Cross tabulation and Chi-square with Fisher's exact test were used.


A total of 438 OML were registered in 315 (57.9%, males: 54.6% versus females: 45.6%, p < 0.05) skin diseased patients. Thus, a certain number of patients had more than one type of OML. Tongue lesions were the most frequently diagnosed OML (23.3%), followed in descending order by white lesions (19.1%), red and blue lesions (11%) and vesiculobullous diseases (6%). OML in various skin diseases were; vesiculobullous reaction pattern (72.2%), lichenoid reaction pattern (60.5%), infectious lesions (56.5%), psoriasiform reaction pattern (56.7%), and spongiotic reaction pattern (46.8%). Presence of OML in skin diseased patients was most frequent in older age groups (62.4% older versus 52.7% younger, p < 0.05), in males (63.2% males versus 52.6% females, p < 0.05), patients with a systemic disease (65.2% with systemic versus 51.9% without systemic disease, p < 0.05) and among current users of smokeless tobacco (toombak) (77% current use versus 54.8% no use, p < 0.00).


OML were frequently diagnosed in skin diseased patients and varied systematically with age, gender, systemic condition and use of toombak. The high prevalence of OML emphasizes the importance of routine examination of oral mucosa in a dermatology clinic.

Peer Review reports


Epidemiological studies of oral mucosal lesions (OML) are rare globally in comparison with studies on caries and periodontal diseases [1]. Whilst caries and periodontal diseases constitute the most prevalent oral diseases worldwide, cancrum oris, oral manifestations of HIV/AIDS, and oral cancer constitute the main burden of oral diseases in deprived communities in sub Saharan Africa [2]. As the pattern of oral diseases vary across countries, site specific epidemiological studies are needed to address the most commonly occurring oral diseases in order to plan for oral health care service [1, 3]

To estimate the prevalence, incidence, distribution and causal factors of OML, studies from the general population are needed. However, population based studies are difficult to carry out because they are expensive and time consuming. The most extensive surveys on OML have been reported from Sweden, America, Malaysia and India [47]. Thus, the majority of publications are based upon selected population groups; hospital attendees, the elderly, school children and patients with specific diseases, such as hepatitis C, diabetes, renal and skin diseases [816]. Absence of use of standardized methodological design in epidemiological studies of OML has shown substantial disparity in the prevalence of these lesions across different settings worldwide. In general, previous studies have shown that OML tend to increase with age and being a male, and also with lifestyle patterns such as tobacco and alcohol consumption [6, 12, 17].

In oral medicine, dermatologic diseases have got special attention as OML may be the primary clinical feature or the only sign of various mucocutaneous diseases [1820]. Focusing on patients referred to a dermatologic clinic, Ramirez-Amador et al [21] reported a prevalence of 35% OML in subjects affected with mucocutaneous conditions. Pemphigus vulgaris, lichen planus, candidiasis, and recurrent aphthous ulcers were the most frequently diagnosed conditions [21]. Yet, there has been no studies focusing on the prevalence of a wide spectrum of different types of OML in patients with dermatologic diseases. This is noteworthy as a certain amount of skin lesions are strongly associated with oral lesions and could be neglected by dentists due to lack of information and/or improper diagnosis [22]. Dentists are often the first to be consulted by patients who develop acute oro-facial pain. Therefore, improving the knowledge about the frequency and diversity of OML at the dermatology clinic will strengthen and enhance interdisciplinary and multispectral approaches as opposed to a single sector approach in the management of such patients. Moreover, OML in skin diseases deserve special attention, considering that some are life-threatening, while others have great impact on individuals and society in terms of pain, discomfort and social and functional limitations [1]. In the Sudan, studies on OML have focused on toombak (Sudanese smokeless tobacco)-associated lesions since several clinical and epidemiological studies have identified toombak use as a possible risk factor for oral cancer [23, 24].


The purpose of this study was to estimate the frequency, diversity and socio-behavioural correlates of different types of OML in adult patients with dermatological diseases attending outpatient's facility of Khartoum Teaching Hospital (KTH) - Dermatology Clinic, Sudan.


Sampling procedure

A cross sectional hospital-based study was carried out focusing on patients aged 18 years and above with skin lesions, attending an outpatient dermatologic clinic at KTH from October 2008 to January 2009. KTH is the largest national hospital in Sudan. It is an open public and referral hospital receiving patients from all states of the country. A minimum sample size of 500 patients was calculated based on an assumed prevalence of OML in skin diseased patients of 5%, a confidence interval of 95%, and an absolute precision of 0.02. All patients (n = 4235) attending the outpatient facility during the survey period were invited to participate in the study. The patients were informed in detail about the study procedure and that they could decline at any time without negative consequences, after having given consent.

A total of 1540 subjects (36.4%) accepted verbally to participate in the study. Fear of taking biopsy for asymptomatic lesions and time consuming examinations (oral examination, interview, and biopsy when needed) were the main reasons for not volunteering to participate. Some refusals did not give reason for non-participation. Among those who initially accepted to participate, 544 (544/1540, 35.3%) patients were included in the study. Reasons for none consenting were patients' disappearance and limited resources. Confidentiality of the patients was maintained. The participants were informed about their oral conditions, and health education was provided. Those who needed dental services were referred to the University of Science and Technology (UST), Faculty of Dentistry, for further investigation and management. Participation was voluntary. Written informed consent or finger print for participation and publication of the study was obtained from patients or their parents/guardians. The research conformed to the Helsinki Declaration and ethical clearance, and approval letters were obtained by the participating institutions' committees (UST and KTH, Department of Dermatology, in Sudan). In Norway, the ethical approval was obtained from the Regional Committee for Medical Ethics in Research.


A face-to-face interview was conducted by two trained dentists. The structured interview schedule contained questions regarding socio-demographics (gender, age, education, occupation and place of residence during the last 5 years), health and oral health related characteristics and lifestyle (smoking, use of toombak or alcohol). The interview schedule was constructed in English and then translated and used in Arabic. Forward and backward translations were done by two independent Sudanese professional translators in Arabic and English language. Oral health related behaviours were assessed in terms of use of toombak, alcohol and smoking. Use of alcohol and use of toombak was assessed using a 5-point scale: (1) Every day; (2) Several times a week; (3) Sometimes; (4) Never; (5) Former use. Two dummy variables were constructed yielding the categories 0 = never (including the original categories 4), 1 = yes (including the original categories 1, 2, 3 and 5). Smoking habit was assessed using a 4-points scale: (1) Every day; (2) Sometimes; (3) Former use; (4) Never. Those scales were dichotomized into 1 = smoke (including the original categories1, 2 and 3), 0 = never smoke (including the original categories 4).

Skin examination

An expert dermatologist (HS) evaluated the patient's dermatological disease through information obtained in a structured interview conducted in the outpatient department of the dermatology clinic. Elements evaluated during skin examination were chief complains, and duration and history of chief complains. Past history and family history were also recorded.

Clinical oral examination

Systematic comprehensive extra-oral and intra-oral clinical examinations based on visual inspection and palpation, following the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for field surveys [25] were carried out by a dentist (NMS) who received a standard training in diagnosis of OML before the data collection (The Gade Institute, Section for Pathology, and Department of Clinical Dentistry-Section for Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway). Oral examination was performed with the subject lying on a medical couch in the outpatient's section of the Department of Dermatology, KTH. All instruments used for oral examination and biopsy were obtained from UST. A head light and an artificial light, mouth mirrors, spatulas, and sterile gauze were used. Occasionally, a cotton swab was used to remove debris to test whether a white lesion could be wiped off. Dentures were removed prior to examination. In those cases requiring further examination; diascopy, smears for Candida albicans, punch and incision biopsies were performed to establish precise accurate diagnosis. In addition, selected sections were stained for examination of Candida albicans or melanin. Final diagnoses of all lesions were confirmed by an expert oral pathologist (ACJ). Skin lesions and OML encountered during the survey were photographed using a digital camera (Canon EOS 400D).

Clinical parameters were recorded using a structured questionnaire modified from the WHO OML form assessment [25, 26]. Parameters which were recorded were; chief complains, disease history, clinical features of the lesion, anatomical location, size, colour, past history, medications used, and associated etiological factors. Self-reported condition of the oral mucosa was also ascertained by asking the patients about dryness of mouth, ulceration, pain, difficulties in swallowing, and burning sensation. The clinical diagnoses of OML were sorted into 14 disease groups, and the total number of types of lesions within each disease group was assessed. In addition, the total number of patients who were diagnosed with any lesion in each separate disease group was counted. Individual patient could have more than one type of OML diagnosed. Consequently, the number of OML would exceed the number of patients.

Diagnostic criteria for oral mucosal lesions

An OML was defined as any abnormal change or any swelling on the oral mucosal surface. Diagnostic criteria for OML were based on Axell criteria and those defined in previous studies and reviews [5, 25, 27, 28]. Thus, median rhomboid glossitis was defined as asymptomatic, smooth to lobulated well demarcated erythematous zone, surrounded by a sharp furrow that affects midline of posterior dorsal tongue. Atrophy of tongue papillae not compatible with the criteria set for median rhomboid glossitis, has been registered as atrophy of tongue papillae. Vitiligo was defined as depigmented macules and patches that have relatively distinct and possibly hyperpigmented margins present in the lips. The lesion should associate with diagnosed vitiligo elsewhere in the skin. Lichenoid lesions were defined as lesions that have in common basal cell damage, have a lichen planus like aspect, but that lack one or more characteristic clinical aspects [29]. Erythema was defined as redness of the mucosa, caused by hyperemia of the mucosal capillaries. The lesion should disappear on finger pressure (blanching).

In addition to strictly intraoral lesions, angular cheilitis and perioral dermatitis were also recorded. Linea alba, cheek biting, leukoedema, lingual varicose, Fordyce's granules, and excessive melanin racial pigmentation were excluded from the study.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 15.0). The level of statistical significance was set at 5%. Cross tabulation and Chi-square with Fisher's exact test were used to test the statistical significance of the relationships between skin disease groups and types OML on the one hand side and socio-behavioural variables on the other.


Sample profile

A total of 544 patients with a skin disease diagnosis participated in the present study. The mean age was 37.1 ± 15.9 years (range 18-85), 50% were females and 77% were permanent residents of Khartoum during the previous 5 years. Males were more frequently employed than females (72.6% versus 27.4%, p < 0.001), whereas use of smoking, toombak or alcohol was more reported in males than females (p < 0.05). Totals of 17.7%, 12.7% and 4.3% confirmed former or current smoking, use of toombak and alcohol use, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 Socio-demographic and behavioural distribution of patients with skin disease by sex (n = 544)

Skin diseases profile

Ninety-four different types of skin lesions, grouped into 22 categories of skin diseases, were diagnosed. The categories of skin diseases that affected less than 10 patients (13 of the 22 categories) were grouped together and labelled "others". Spongiotic reaction pattern was the most frequently diagnosed dermatological disease group (126/544, 23.2%), followed in descending order by skin infectious diseases (115/544, 21.1%, i.e. fungal infections 9.6%, viral infection 6.8%, bacterial infection 2.9%, and protozoal infection 1.8%), vesiculobullous reaction pattern (54/544, 9.9%), and disorders of cutaneous appendages (48/544, 8.8%). The least frequently diagnosed group was tumours (12/544, 2.2%) (Figure 1). Disorder of pigmentation was more common in females than in males (78% versus 22%, p < 0.001). Vesiculobullous reaction pattern and disorders of cutaneous appendages were most common in older (32.7% versus 67.3%) and younger (85.4% versus 14.6%) patients, respectively (p < 0.05).

Figure 1

Frequencies of skin disease categories.

Oral mucosal lesions profile

In total, 315 of the 544 patients included in the study had at least one clinically recognized type of OML (57.9%). A certain amount of the patients had more than one type of OML, thus the total number of OML recorded in the 315 patients was 438. Of those affected, 202 (64.1%) had one type of OML, 78 (24.8%) had two types of OML, and 35 (11.1%) had three or more types of OML. A total of 51 different clinical diagnoses were recorded. For each patient, one type of OML was only recorded once, although in some patients the OML could be manifested at several locations. Only 15.9% (n = 50) of the patients agreed to undergo punch biopsy confirmation. Absence of epithelial dysplasia was confirmed in all biopsies taken from lesions such as oral leukoplakia, frictional lesion, and snuff dipper's lesions. The age of patients affected by OML ranged from 18 to 81 years, with an average of 38.6 years (±16.5).

As shown in Table 2, tongue lesions were the most frequently diagnosed OML (23.3%) followed in descending order by white lesions (19.1%), red and blue lesions (11%) and vesiculobullous diseases (6%). The least frequently diagnosed OML group was malignant tumours (0.2%). White lesions (42.2% versus 57.8%) and the red and blue lesions (37.3% versus 62.7%) occurred most frequently in older patients (p < 0.05). Ulcerative conditions were most frequently diagnosed in males (18% versus 6%, p < 0.05). Coated tongue (48.0%) and tongue tie (3.1%) were the most frequently occurring OML within tongue lesions, whereas snuff dipper lesions/toombak-associated lesions (28.8%), erythema (48.3%), and pemphigus vulgaris (46.9%) were the most frequently occurring diagnoses in white lesions, red and blue lesions and vesiculobullous diseases, respectively. A total of 0.2% of the patients investigated presented with Kaposi's sarcoma, the only lesion in the group of malignant tumours.

Table 2 Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in the total group of skin diseased patients (n = 544), in the group of skin diseased patients with OML and within the 14 most frequently occurring OML groups

Table 3 depicts the frequency distribution of OML groups within each skin disease group investigated. OML occurred most frequently in the group of skin vesiculobullous reaction pattern (72.2%), followed in descending order by tumours (66.7%), and lichenoid reaction pattern (60.5%). OML occurred least frequently in the skin disease group of spongiotic reaction pattern (46.8%). Tongue lesions were the most frequently occurring OML group across the various skin diseases. The highest prevalence (33.3%) of the tongue lesions was found among psoriasiform reaction pattern. On the other hand, white lesions occurred most frequently in the skin disease groups of disorders of pigmentation and lichenoid reaction pattern amounting to 43.9% and 34.2%, respectively.

Table 3 Frequency distribution n (%) of patients with any OML within the 10 most common groups of skin diseased patients

As shown in Table 4, OML occurred more frequently in older than younger patients (62.4% versus 52.7%, p < 0.05), in males than in females (63.2% versus 52.6%, p < 0.05) and more frequently in patients with than without a medical diagnosis (65% versus 51.9%, p < 0.05). Moreover, OML occurred more frequently in toombak users than in their counterparts who had never used toombak (77.9% versus 54.8%, p < 0.00).

Table 4 Skin diseases with oral lesions and with at least two OML by socio-demographic and behavioural factors (n = 544)


Frequency and diversity of oral mucosal lesions

To our knowledge this study is the first to assess the frequency and diversity of OML in dermatologic patients, a selected group of the Sudanese adult population. The study group comprised patients with a wide range of dermatological diseases, yielding small numbers in each group, thus limiting the probability for stratified analyses. The most frequently occurring groups of dermatological diseases were spongiotic reaction pattern, infectious diseases, and vesiculobullous diseases. This accords with the results of a recent survey by the International Foundation of Dermatology, reporting that infectious disease, dermatitis, and HIV-related skin disease are the main skin dermatological conditions at the community level worldwide [30].

According to the present results, about 58% of the subjects investigated suffered from at least one type of OML, and the occurrence of any OML varied across groups of dermatological diseases from 46.8% in spongiotic to 72.2% in vesiculobullous reaction patterns. Tongue lesions were the most frequently occurring OML group (23.3%) followed by white lesions (19%), red and blue lesions (11%) and vesiculobullous diseases (6%). White lesions and red and blue lesions varied systematically with age, being most frequent in older persons, whereas ulcerative conditions were most common in males. Coated tongue, snuff dippers lesion, erythema and pemphigus vulgaris were the OML most frequently observed in the groups of tongue lesions, white lesions, red and blue lesions and vesiculobullous diseases, respectively.

Study Limitations

The present findings should be interpreted with caution due to some limitations. Patients' refusal to volunteer for biopsy might have led to some misclassifications. Thus, some lesions that needed histological confirmation (leukoplakia, lupus erythematosus, pemphigus vulgaris, fibroepithelial polyp, chronic hyperplastic candidiasis, cheilitis glandularis, focal epithelial hyperplasia, Kaposi's sarcoma and some others) were diagnosed clinically and might contain error. Absence of standard methodological approaches and lack of agreed-upon diagnostic criteria, make comparison of epidemiological studies concerning the prevalence of OML difficult. In spite of the limitations associated with diagnostic criteria, all mucosal pathological alterations were identified in the present study.

Being a hospital based study; it is not possible to generalize from the study group to any larger population of skin diseased individuals inside or outside Khartoum. This is due to the rich geographical and socio-cultural diversity within Sudan, as well as the low utilization rate of health facilities generally observed in any developing country [31, 32]. Although the KTH received patients that have been referred from all over the country, biases in the study group might have been introduced due to differing referral procedures as well as the moderate response rate.

It is unsure how close an approximation the present figures are to the prevalence of OML in the general adult population of Sudan. Probably, the rates of OML presented in this study might be overestimated both with respect to the Sudanese population in general as well as to the population of adults suffering dermatological problems. Self-selection bias was considered to influence the result of the study as patients were more likely to respond when they had OML (the characteristic of interest). Moreover, with respect to the diversity of the types of OML, the present figures might be biased towards those for which people are more inclined to seek treatment, whereas other conditions are less likely to be identified in hospital based prevalence studies. Community based surveys based on random samples from the broader adult population should be recommended for future studies to estimate the actual prevalence and the health burden of OML in this country.

Since the precision of estimates tend to decrease with decreasing prevalence, the prevalence rates of rare conditions (≤ 1%) should be interpreted with particular caution. In addition, populations with different distributions of the risk factors identified for OML are not directly comparable without adjustment. Noteworthy the absence of an official patient's medical journal has created uncertainty regarding participants' self-reported medical condition and lifestyle patterns. A major limitation of self-reported data is recall biases in terms of underreporting of socially undesired events and a tendency to recall events as having occurred more recently than they actually did [33]. Sensitive events, tobacco and alcohol use and some medical diagnoses would probably be under reported due to social stigma and social desirability.

Comparison of present findings with those of previous studies

In spite of its limitations, the present study provides important information about the frequency and diversity of OML in patients with various dermatological diseases as well as the social and behavioural factors that discriminate between skin diseased patients with and without OML. Moreover, OML in the present study may appear as a part of mucocutaneous diseases, a manifestation of systemic diseases (metabolic or immunological), or an expression of drug reaction. Some OML diagnosed could be attributed to trauma, infection, or denture use, or they could be a manifestation of specific cultural habits, like use of toombak. Due to the cross sectional nature of the present study, any causal relationship could, however, not be concluded upon.

Compared with the frequency of patients with OML observed in this study (57.9%), previous ones have shown point prevalence in the range 25% - 61.6% [6, 9, 3436]. Specifically, the frequency of patients with OML in the present study group was higher than those observed in the Cambodian (4.9%) [37] Malaysian (9.7%) [7], Spanish (51%) [12] and Turkish (42%) populations [36]. It was lower than that observed in population in Ljubljana (61.6%), but almost similar to the prevalence estimated in Spanish dental patients (58.7%) [8, 35]. In accordance with the NHANES III [6] and the Swedish study published by Axell [5], the present study used the WHO diagnostic criteria and Axell's diagnostic criteria [5, 25]. Thus, the present results are to some extent comparable with those previous studies, in spite that NHANES III and the study by Axell used large probability samples from the general populations. The frequency observed in this study was higher than that reported in NHANES III, amounting 28% in US adults aged 17 years and above.

Consistent with the results of NHANES III and other studies, the frequency of patients with OML presented in this study varied systematically and positively with being a male and with increasing age. Other epidemiological studies have shown an opposite sex gradient or no systematic variation according to sex [9, 38, 39]. Sex differences in the occurrence of OML might be attributed to the high consumption of toombak by males, differences in genetic factors, social responsibility and masculinity believes [40]. Use of toombak was reported by 12.5% of the total study group. In a study emanating from northern Sudan, the frequency of toombak use was estimated to 40% (43, 44). Males adopt a more active outdoor life-style and are exposed to some environmental risk factors to a higher extent than women. In contrast, women are more health conscious and faster to detect abnormality in earlier stages. Older people have higher risk to develop chronic diseases in general because of increased risk with increasing age due to metabolic changes, medications, prosthetic use, and psychological problem. Moreover, economic constraints and physical status of older people may limit their access to health care services [41, 42].

Epidemiological studies have revealed that tongue lesions constitute a considerable proportion of OML, with prevalence rates varying across different parts of the world. Number and type of tongue lesions involved in different studies have been an important factor in this variability. The present figure amounting to 23%, is lower than that reported in some previous studies [43, 44], but higher than the rates assessed in NHANES III and in the Hungarian population [6, 45]. Of interest was that 17 out of 30 patients (56.7%) with psoriasiform reaction pattern had OML and that tongue lesions (33.3%) were the most frequently occurring OML in this particular dermatological disease group (Table 3). A study of Brazilian psoriatic patients revealed that 59% presented with tongue lesions, which was the most dominant OML [46]. Similar findings have been reported by Hernandez-Perez et al [19]. With respect to fissured tongue, the total of 7% of patients with fissured tongue observed in this study corroborates the range reported previously [5, 45, 47, 48]. Some few studies have reported high frequency of fissured tongue [35, 39, 43]. Over the past few years an association between geographic tongue, fissured tongue and psoriasis has been postulated. Some authors believe that it is a natural developmental anomaly and a coincidence finding [46, 49] while others suggest a pathogenic relation between them [50].

Snuff dipper's lesion was observed in 5.5% of the study group (Table 2). This frequency is higher than that reported in the American and Kenyan population (1.2% and 0.4%, respectively) [6, 51], but lower than that observed in the Swedish population (15.9%) [52]. Toombak has been known to play a major role in the aetiology of oral cancer in the Sudan [23]. It contains at least 100-fold higher concentrations of the carcinogenic factor tobacco specific N-nitrosamines compared with American and Swedish commercial snuff brands [53]. A recent study showed that toombak induces DNA damage and cell death in normal human oral cells more than the Swedish snuff [54].

The frequency of oral leukoplakia (3.1%) disclosed in this study is comparable to findings from Sweden (3.6%), but higher than that reported in NHANES III (0.38%) [6]. Leukoplakia is a premalignant lesion with transformation rates varying from 15.6% to 39.2% [55]. It is highly associated with cigarette smoking [8, 27, 56]. Although we have not done any further analysis of smoking as a possible risk factor of leukoplakia, the low frequency rate of cigarette smoking concomitant with a relatively high frequency of oral leukoplakia as observed in this study deserves further investigation. The high frequency of leukoplakia should be taken seriously as leukoplakia in non-smokers is more likely to undergo malignant transformation than leukoplakia in smokers [55].

A total of 4 patients (0.7%) with oral manifestation of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) on vermilion border were diagnosed in this study (Table 2). This condition has rarely been registered in OML investigation studies. Axel [5] reported 0.01% in a Swedish population, while Ramirez et al [21] reported 5% in lupus patients referred to a dermatology clinic because of oral complaints. The difference between the present figure and that reported by Ramirez et al may be attributed to the fact that although both data were collected in dermatology clinic, the selection of patients was different. The precancerous potential of oral DLE is a controversial topic. Lu and Le [57] reported an incidence of 13.6% epithelial dysplasia in DLE. Another report from Scully et al [58] postulated that DLE on the lip showed a premalignant potential. Sun exposure plays a crucial role in the induction or exacerbation of the lupus erythematosus and actinic cheilitis [28, 59, 60]. In connection to that, Wakisa et al [61] reported oral cell carcinoma on lips of black patients with oral DLE. Noteworthy the tropical climate in Sudan and the summer temperature which often exceed 43°C has to be considered in interpreting such lesions.

Frequency of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) has been recorded as life time prevalence, point prevalence and as combination of both. The present study revealed a point prevalence of 2.9%, which is higher than 2% and 0.8% reported by Axell [5] and NHANES III [6] respectively. Yet, it was lower than 60% and 55% in US female student nurses and professional school students respectively [62]. This illustrates how RAS varies according to the study group examined. A number of factors have been attributed to the occurrence of this pathology, including immune dysfunction [28].


In conclusion, taking into consideration the selected study group and the cross-sectional design of the study, the results presented here cannot be generalized to a broader population or discussed in terms of causal relationship. The results revealed that OML were frequently diagnosed in skin diseased patients attending KTH and varied systematically with age, gender, systemic condition and use of toombak. Thus, this study provides information regarding the frequency, diversity and socio-behavioural correlates of OML of an important sub group of the Sudanese population that has never been disclosed before. Of particular significance are those lesions having a potential of malignant transformation. Accordingly, frequent and regular inspection of the oral cavity of the skin diseased patients must be emphasized. Consequently, an interdisciplinary approach in the management of such patients is highly recommended.


  1. 1.

    Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, Estupinan-Day S, Ndiaye C: The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bull World Health Organ. 2005, 83 (9): 661-669.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Thorpe S: Oral Health Issues in the African Region: Current Situation and Future Perspectives. J Dent Educ. 2006, 70 (Suppl 11): 8-15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Petersen PE: The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century--the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003, 31 (Suppl 1): 3-23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mehta FS, Gupta PC, Daftary DK, Pindborg JJ, Choksi SK: An epidemiologic study of oral cancer and precancerous conditions among 101,761 villagers in Maharashtra, India. Int J Cancer. 1972, 10 (1): 134-141. 10.1002/ijc.2910100118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Axell T: A prevalence study of oral mucosal lesions in an adult Swedish population. Odontol Revy Suppl. 1976, 36: 1-103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Shulman JD, Beach MM, Rivera-Hidalgo F: The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in U.S. adults: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004, 135 (9): 1279-1286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zain RB, Ikeda N, Razak IA, Axell T, Majid ZA, Gupta PC, Yaacob M: A national epidemiological survey of oral mucosal lesions in Malaysia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997, 25 (5): 377-383. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00959.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Martinez Diaz-Canel AI, Garcia-Pola Vallejo MJ: Epidemiological study of oral mucosa pathology in patients of the Oviedo School of Stomatology. Med Oral. 2002, 7 (1): 4-9. 10-16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jahanbani J, Sandvik L, Lyberg T, Ahlfors E: Evaluation of oral mucosal lesions in 598 referred Iranian patients. Open Dent J. 2009, 3: 42-47. 10.2174/1874210600903010042.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Al-Mobeeriek A, AlDosari AM: Prevalence of oral lesions among Saudi dental patients. Ann Saudi Med. 2009, 29 (5): 365-368. 10.4103/0256-4947.55166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Espinoza I, Rojas R, Aranda W, Gamonal J: Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in elderly people in Santiago, Chile. J Oral Pathol Med. 2003, 32 (10): 571-575. 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2003.00031.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Garcia-Pola Vallejo MJ, Martinez Diaz-Canel AI, Garcia Martin JM, Gonzalez Garcia M: Risk factors for oral soft tissue lesions in an adult Spanish population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002, 30 (4): 277-285. 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.00048.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Grossmann Sde M, Teixeira R, de Aguiar MC, de Moura MD, do Carmo MA: Oral mucosal conditions in chronic hepatitis C Brazilian patients: a cross-sectional study. J Public Health Dent. 2009, 69 (3): 168-175. 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2009.00119.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Guggenheimer J, Moore PA, Rossie K, Myers D, Mongelluzzo MB, Block HM, Weyant R, Orchard T: Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and oral soft tissue pathologies. I. Prevalence and characteristics of non-candidal lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000, 89 (5): 563-569. 10.1067/moe.2000.104476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Thorman R, Neovius M, Hylander B: Prevalence and early detection of oral fungal infection: a cross-sectional controlled study in a group of Swedish end-stage renal disease patients. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2009, 43 (4): 325-330. 10.1080/00365590902836492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    de la Rosa Garcia E, Mondragon Padilla A, Aranda Romo S, Bustamante Ramirez MA: Oral mucosa symptoms, signs and lesions, in end stage renal disease and non-end stage renal disease diabetic patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006, 11 (6): E467-473.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Castellanos JL, Diaz-Guzman L: Lesions of the oral mucosa: an epidemiological study of 23785 Mexican patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008, 105 (1): 79-85. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.01.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Budimir J, Mihic LL, Situm M, Bulat V, Persic S, Tomljanovic-Veselski M: Oral lesions in patients with pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid. Acta Clin Croat. 2008, 47 (1): 13-18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hernandez-Perez F, Jaimes-Aveldanez A, Urquizo-Ruvalcaba Mde L, Diaz-Barcelot M, Irigoyen-Camacho ME, Vega-Memije ME, Mosqueda-Taylor A: Prevalence of oral lesions in patients with psoriasis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008, 13 (11): E703-708.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bork K: Diseases of the Lips and Mouth. Braun-Falco's Dermatology. Edited by: Burgdorf WHC, Plewig G, Wolff HH. 2009, Landthaler M: Springer, 1081-1107. 3

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ramirez-Amador VA, Esquivel-Pedraza L, Orozco-Topete R: Frequency of oral conditions in a dermatology clinic. Int J Dermatol. 2000, 39 (7): 501-505. 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2000.00955.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ergun S, Ozel S, Koray M, Kurklu E, Ak G, Tanyeri H: Dentists' knowledge and opinions about oral mucosal lesions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009, 38 (12): 1283-1288. 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.07.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Idris AM, Ahmed HM, Mukhtar BI, Gadir AF, el-Beshir EI: Descriptive epidemiology of oral neoplasms in Sudan 1970-1985 and the role of toombak. Int J Cancer. 1995, 61 (2): 155-158. 10.1002/ijc.2910610202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Idris AM, Warnakulasuriya KA, Ibrahim YE, Nielsen R, Cooper D, Johnson NW: Toombak-associated oral mucosal lesions in Sudanese show a low prevalence of epithelial dysplasia. J Oral Pathol Med. 1996, 25 (5): 239-244. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1996.tb01378.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kramer IR, Pindborg JJ, Bezroukov V, Infirri JS: Guide to epidemiology and diagnosis of oral mucosal diseases and conditions. World Health Organization. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1980, 8 (1): 1-26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Organization WH: Oral health Surveys: Basic Methods. 1997, Geneva, 4

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Axell T, Pindborg JJ, Smith CJ, van der Waal I: Oral white lesions with special reference to precancerous and tobacco- related lesions: conclusions of an international symposium held in Uppsala, Sweden, May 18-21 1994. International Collaborative Group on Oral White Lesions. J Oral Pathol Med. 1996, 25 (2): 49-54. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1996.tb00191.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Regezi Joseph, Sciubba James, Jordan RCK: Oral Pathology clinical pathologic correlations. 2008, Linda Duncan, 5

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    van der Waal I: Oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions; a critical appraisal with emphasis on the diagnostic aspects. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2009, 14 (7): E310-314.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Roderick H, Sandra E B, Suephy C, Roberto E, Anne H, Tonya M, Antoine M: Skin Diseases. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Edited by: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR. 2006, []2

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bovet P, Gervasoni JP, Mkamba M, Balampama M, Lengeler C, Paccaud F: Low utilization of health care services following screening for hypertension in Dar es Salaam (Tanzania): a prospective population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2008, 8: 407-10.1186/1471-2458-8-407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Okunseri C, Born D, Chattopadhyay A: Self-reported dental visits among adults in Benin City, Nigeria. Int Dent J. 2004, 54 (6): 450-456. 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2004.tb00303.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Philip G, Janet H, Matt B: Estimating a Socially Undesirable Behaviour. Marketing Bulletin. 1992, 3: 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Pentenero M, Broccoletti R, Carbone M, Conrotto D, Gandolfo S: The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in adults from the Turin area. Oral Dis. 2008, 14 (4): 356-366. 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2007.01391.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kovac-Kovacic M, Skaleric U: The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in a population in Ljubljana, Slovenia. J Oral Pathol Med. 2000, 29 (7): 331-335. 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2000.290707.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mumcu G, Cimilli H, Sur H, Hayran O, Atalay T: Prevalence and distribution of oral lesions: a cross-sectional study in Turkey. Oral Dis. 2005, 11 (2): 81-87. 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2004.01062.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ikeda N, Handa Y, Khim SP, Durward C, Axell T, Mizuno T, Fukano H, Kawai T: Prevalence study of oral mucosal lesions in a selected Cambodian population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1995, 23 (1): 49-54. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1995.tb00197.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lin HC, Corbet EF, Lo EC: Oral mucosal lesions in adult Chinese. J Dent Res. 2001, 80 (5): 1486-1490. 10.1177/00220345010800052001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    dos Santos PJ, Bessa CF, de Aguiar MC, do Carmo MA: Cross-sectional study of oral mucosal conditions among a central Amazonian Indian community, Brazil. J Oral Pathol Med. 2004, 33 (1): 7-12. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2004.00003.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Galdas PM, Cheater F, Marshall P: Men and health help-seeking behaviour: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2005, 49 (6): 616-623. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03331.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Allin S, Masseria C, Mossialos E: Inequality in health care use among older people in the United Kingdom: an analysis of panel data. 2006, London, []

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Louvison MC, Lebrao ML, Duarte YA, Santos JL, Malik AM, Almeida ES: [Inequalities in access to health care services and utilization for the elderly in Sao Paulo, Brazil]. Rev Saude Publica. 2008, 42 (4): 733-740. 10.1590/S0034-89102008000400021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Avcu N, Kanli A: The prevalence of tongue lesions in 5150 Turkish dental outpatients. Oral Dis. 2003, 9 (4): 188-195. 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2003.02933.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Motallebnejad M, Babaee N, Sakhdari S, Tavasoli M: An epidemiologic study of tongue lesions in 1901 Iranian dental outpatients. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008, 9 (7): 73-80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Banoczy J, Rigo O, Albrecht M: Prevalence study of tongue lesions in a Hungarian population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993, 21 (4): 224-226. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1993.tb00761.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Costa SC, Hirota SK, Takahashi MD, Andrade H, Migliari DA: Oral lesions in 166 patients with cutaneous psoriasis: a controlled study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009, 14 (8): e371-375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Darwazeh AM, Pillai K: Prevalence of tongue lesions in 1013 Jordanian dental outpatients. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993, 21 (5): 323-324. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1993.tb00785.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Rogers RS, Bruce AJ: The tongue in clinical diagnosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2004, 18 (3): 254-259. 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2004.00769.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Strassburg M, Knolle G: Diseases of the Oral Mucosa: A Color Atlas. 1994, Quintessence Pub Co

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Gonzaga HF, Torres EA, Alchorne MM, Gerbase-Delima M: Both psoriasis and benign migratory glossitis are associated with HLA-Cw6. The British journal of dermatology. 1996, 135 (3): 368-370. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1996.tb01497.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Macigo FG, Mwaniki DL, Guthua SW: Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in a Kenyan population with special reference to oral leukoplakia. East Afr Med J. 1995, 72 (12): 778-782.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Mornstad H, Axell T, Sundstrom B: Clinical picture of snuff dipper's lesion in Swedes. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1989, 17 (2): 97-101. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1989.tb00597.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Idris AM, Prokopczyk B, Hoffmann D: Toombak: a major risk factor for cancer of the oral cavity in Sudan. Prev Med. 1994, 23 (6): 832-839. 10.1006/pmed.1994.1141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Costea DE, Lukandu O, Bui L, Ibrahim MJ, Lygre R, Neppelberg E, Ibrahim SO, Vintermyr OK, Johannessen AC: Adverse effects of Sudanese toombak vs. Swedish snuff on human oral cells. J Oral Pathol Med. 2010, 39 (2): 128-140. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2009.00825.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Neville BW, Day TA: Oral cancer and precancerous lesions. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002, 52 (4): 195-215. 10.3322/canjclin.52.4.195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Winn DM: Tobacco use and oral disease. J Dent Educ. 2001, 65 (4): 306-312.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Lu ZY, Le FY: A research on the correlation of oral mucosal patches stria diseases and epithelial dysplasia. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2001, 10 (2): 102-104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Scully C, Flint RS, SR P: Oral diseases. 1996, 2

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Lehmann P, Homey B: Clinic and pathophysiology of photosensitivity in lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev. 2009, 8 (6): 456-461. 10.1016/j.autrev.2008.12.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Sanders CJ, Van Weelden H, Kazzaz GA, Sigurdsson V, Toonstra J, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA: Photosensitivity in patients with lupus erythematosus: a clinical and photobiological study of 100 patients using a prolonged phototest protocol. Br J Dermatol. 2003, 149 (1): 131-137. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05379.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Mulwafu WK, Fagan JJ, Jessop S: Squamous cell carcinoma in black patients with discoid lupus erythematosus. S Afr J Surg. 2006, 44 (4): 144-146.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Jurge S, Kuffer R, Scully C, Porter SR: Mucosal disease series. Number VI. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Oral Dis. 2006, 12 (1): 1-21. 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01143.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Download references


This work was funded by University of Bergen. The authors wish to thank The Gade Institute, UST and KTH-dermatology department in Sudan for kind cooperation and support of this research, as well as dermatology patients and dentists who helped in data collection and made this work done. Special thanks to dermatologist Adil Basher in designing the skin disease diagnostic sheet and his continued assistance during the data collection. Also we acknowledge the helpful comments of Professor Lisbeth Sviland and senior consultant dermatologist Lisbeth Rustad. We also thank Edith Fick for kind assistance in the laboratory work.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne C Johannessen.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

NMS was the main author conceived and designed the study, collected data, performed statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. ANÅ was the co-supervisor, participated and guided the study design and has been actively involved in all stages throughout the work, especially statistical analyses and epidemiological analyses of data. RWA facilitated the field work and has been providing critical comments on the study design and the manuscript. HS was the main dermatologist who examined and diagnosed all the patients. ACJ was the main supervisor, supervising and guiding the whole work and confirmed and approved all the diagnosis of oral lesions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suliman, N.M., Åstrøm, A.N., Ali, R.W. et al. Oral mucosal lesions in skin diseased patients attending a dermatologic clinic: a cross-sectional study in Sudan. BMC Oral Health 11, 24 (2011).

Download citation


  • Smokeless Tobacco
  • Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis
  • Dermatology Clinic
  • Oral Leukoplakia
  • Discoid Lupus Erythematosus