Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

The Candida species that are important for the development of atrophic glossitis in xerostomia patients

  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2, 3,
  • 1, 4,
  • 4,
  • 1, 5,
  • 6,
  • 1, 7,
  • 2 and
  • 1Email author
BMC Oral HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:153

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0449-3

  • Received: 1 March 2017
  • Accepted: 7 December 2017
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to clarify the species of Candida that are important for the development of atrophic glossitis in xerostomia patients.

Methods

A total of 231 patients with subjective dry mouth were enrolled in the present study. Logistic regression analysis was performed to clarify the contribution of each Candida species and other variables to the development of atrophic glossitis. The dependent variable was the absence/presence of atrophic glossitis. The Candida colony-forming units (CFU) of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei, as well as age, gender, resting (RSFR) and stimulated (SSFR) whole salivary flow rate, and denture-wearing status, were treated as explanatory variables.

Results

Logistic regression analysis showed that two factors were closely associated with the presence of atrophic glossitis: an increase in C. albicans CFU and a decrease in the SSFR.

Conclusions

C. albicans, but not non-albicans Candida, was associated with atrophic glossitis in xerostomia patients who had no systemic predisposing factors, indicating that C. albicans remains a treatment target for Candida-related atrophic glossitis.

Keywords

  • Atrophic glossitis
  • Candida species
  • Candidiasis
  • Xerostomia
  • Logistic regression analysis

Background

Oral candidiasis is sub-classified into three major variants: pseudomembranous, erythematous, and hypertrophic [1, 2]. In addition to these variants, angular cheilitis, median rhomboid glossitis, and denture stomatitis have been recognized as Candida-associated lesions; moreover, Candida super-infection in oral lichen planus is frequently encountered. The various forms of oral candidiasis are caused by interactions between the host defenses and fungal virulence factors.

Atrophic glossitis is caused by complete or partial lingual papillary atrophy. It exhibits a smooth, glossy appearance with a red or pink background and is primarily a manifestation of an underlying condition. Nutritional deficiencies (iron, folic acid, vitamin B12, riboflavin, and niacin) are the most common causes [3]. Other etiological factors of atrophic glossitis include hyposalivation and candidiasis [2, 46]. An increase in Candida colony counts, a low salivary flow rate, and advanced age were identified as being risk factors that were closely associated with the development of atrophic glossitis [7, 8]. However, the Candida species that are the most relevant to the development of atrophic glossitis remain unclear.

Candida albicans is the primary causative organism of oral candidiasis. Recent studies have suggested that non-albicans Candida (NAC) species, such as C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei are also pathogenic in humans [2, 813]. One of these studies showed that C. albicans was frequently isolated from the tongue, while C. glabrata was most frequently isolated from the angle of the mouth, suggesting that certain Candida species are associated with oral candidiasis at particular sites [8]. In a study on the relationship between Candida species and local and systemic predisposing factors, only C. albicans infections were significantly associated with the use of inhaled steroids and antibiotics and super-infection with oral lichen planus, whereas the presence of removable dentures was significantly associated with the detection of NAC or a mixed flora consisting of C. albicans and NAC [9]. Similarly, the incidence of colonization with more than one Candida species was found to be higher in cases of denture stomatitis than in cases involving other forms of oral candidiasis [10]. C. albicans and C. glabrata were the most prevalent species detected in cases of mixed infections [10, 14]. However, no association has been confirmed between a specific Candida species and any particular sign or symptom of oral candidiasis.

The purpose of this study was to clarify the species of Candida that are important for the development of atrophic glossitis in xerostomia patients.

Methods

Patient selection

The subjects enrolled in the study were patients at the Dry Mouth Clinic at Tsurumi University Dental Hospital. Patients who had subjective dry mouth (xerostomia) were examined to determine their salivary flow rate and oral findings, and a mycological examination was performed. The examinations were performed between January 2010 and February 2013. Patients with systemic predisposing factors for candidiasis, such as diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency, and malnutrition, and patients who were using medications that predisposed them to candidiasis, such as antibiotics and steroids, were excluded from this study. A total of 231 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 66.6 ± 12.6 years; range 33 to 96 years), were enrolled in this study. Forty-two of the patients were men (18.2%), and 189 were women (81.8%).

Evaluation of atrophic glossitis

The presence of atrophic glossitis was determined by the attending dentist. The severity and extent of papillary atrophy and loss were graded from 0 to 4 as follows: 0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; and 4, profound loss (Fig. 1). Atrophic glossitis was considered mild when the lingual papillae in the affected area of the tongue were smaller in size than in the intact area. Partial loss (<50%) of the lingual papillae of the dorsum of the tongue was considered to indicate moderate disease, and partial loss (>50%) was considered to indicate severe disease. Patients who showed loss of the lingual papillae throughout the dorsum of the tongue were considered to have profound loss. When the attending dentist could not determine the amount of papillary atrophy, a consensus was reached by discussion with an oral surgeon (Y.N.) with 30 years of experience [7].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The grades of atrophic glossitis. 0, none; 1 (mild), the lingual papillae in the affected area of the tongue were smaller in size than those in the intact area; 2 (moderate), partial loss (<50%) of the lingual papillae on the dorsum of the tongue; 3 (severe), partial loss (>50%) of the lingual papillae on the dorsum of the tongue; and 4 (profound loss)

Salivary secretion test

To measure the resting whole salivary flow rate (RSFR), each subject sat at rest, and saliva was collected into a cup during a 15-min period in the absence of masticatory movements. The saliva volume was measured using a disposable syringe. An RSFR of ≤1.5 mL/15 min (≤ 0.1 mL/min) was classified as hyposalivation according to previously determined criteria [15, 16]. The stimulated whole salivary flow rate (SSFR) was also measured by collecting saliva during a 10-min period. Salivation was stimulated by chewing a piece of gum (Free zone gum; Lotte Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). An SSFR of ≤10 mL/10 min was classified as hyposalivation.

Fungal culture

The dorsum of the tongue was swabbed 10 times with a cotton applicator (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and the swab was directly inoculated onto CHROMagar™ Candida selective plates (CHROMagar Microbiology, Paris, France) [7, 17]. The number of Candida colonies was counted after incubation at 30 °C for 48 h and was expressed as colony-forming units (CFU) per plate. Each Candida species was identified by colony color in accordance with the manufacturer’s manual [17].

Statistical analyses

A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to clarify the contribution of each Candida species and the other variables to the development of atrophic glossitis. The dependent variable was the absence (Grade 0)/presence (Grades 1–4) of atrophic glossitis, while the Candida CFU of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei as well as age, RSRF, SSRF and denture-wearing status were treated as explanatory variables. The results of the logistic regression analysis were used to ascertain which independent variables had a major effect on the absence or presence of atrophic glossitis.

Salivation and the patient’s denture-wearing status were analyzed as factors associated with increased Candida colony counts. To determine the effects of hyposalivation and denture wearing on Candida colony counts, differences among the groups were evaluated by the Kruskal-Wallis H test, followed by multiple comparison testing using the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction. A total of four groups were formed through combinations of two factors: salivation status (hyposalivation [SSFR ≤10 mL/10 min] or normosalivation [SSFR >10 mL/10 min]) and denture-wearing status (denture wearing/no dentures).

All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software program, ver. 22.0 J (IBM Japan, Tokyo). P values of <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Study population

Overall, atrophic glossitis was noted in 46 patients (Table 1), tongue redness in 58, palate redness in 16, buccal mucosa redness in 10, lip redness in 16 and angular cheilitis in 25. The mean RSFR was 2.1 ± 2.7 mL/15 min (range, 0–16.0 mL/15 min); 26 (11.3%) patients had an RSFR of 0 mL/15 min, and 141 (61.0%) patients had an RSFR of ≤1.5 mL/15 min. The mean SSFR was 11.3 ± 7.0 mL/10 min (range, 0.6–40.6 mL/10 min); 109 (47.2%) patients had an SSFR ≤10 mL/10 min. According to the Japanese criteria [18], 26 (11.3%) patients were diagnosed with Sjögren’s syndrome. Ninety-two (39.8%) patients wore dentures. Partial removable dentures were more commonly used than full dentures, but we did not consider the type of denture in our analysis.
Table 1

Characteristics of study population

Atrophic glossitis

Number

Age

Male:Female

Saliva flow rate

Denture wearer

RSFR

SSFR

Grade 0

185

63.4 ± 12.5

37:148

2.4 ± 2.7

12.2 ± 6.9

67/185 (36.2%)

Grade 1

15

72.8 ± 10.8

1:14

1.9 ± 3.3

11.3 ± 6.1

8/15 (53.3%)

Grade 2

23

68.2 ± 11.9

2:21

1.0 ± 2.4

6.3 ± 6.2

11/23 (47.8%)

Grade 3

5

74.4 ± 10.0

2:3

1.1 ± 0.7

7.7 ± 4.8

4/5 (80.0%)

Grade 4

3

83.0 ± 6.5

0:3

0.1 ± 0.1

3.9 ± 0.8

2/3 (66.7%)

Total

231

66.6 ± 12.6

42:189

2.1 ± 2.7

11.3 ± 7.0

92/231(39.8%)

RSFR resting whole salivary flow rate (mL/15 min), SSFR stimulated whole salivary flow rate (mL/10 min); Values are mean ± SD

Candida colonization according to the severity of atrophic glossitis

One hundred thirty-five (58.4%) patients were Candida-positive (Table 2). The species of Candida in these cases were as follows: C. albicans, n = 119 (88.1%); C. glabrata, n = 50 (37.0%); C. tropicalis, n = 20 (14.8%), and C. krusei, n = 9 (6.7%). C. albicans and C. glabrata were simultaneously detected in 41 (30.4%) of the 135 patients.
Table 2

Prevalence of Candida colonization according to the severity of atrophic glossitis

Atrophic glossitis

Detection of Candida a

C. albicans

C. glabrata

C. tropicalis

C. krusei

Candida spp.

Grade 0

76/185

30/185

16/185

5/185

14/185

Grade 1

13/15

4/15

3/15

0/15

0/15

Grade 2

22/23

11/23

1/23

4/23

3/23

Grade 3

5/5

2/5

0/5

0/5

0/5

Grade 4

3/3

3/3

0/3

0/3

1/3

Total

119/231

b50/231

20/231

9/231

18/231

aThe culture test was positive in 135/231 (58.4%) patients. Values are number of cases

b C. albicans and C. glabrata were simultaneously detected in 41 cases

The variables of patients with and without atrophic glossitis

When the participants were divided into two groups according to the absence/presence of atrophic glossitis (Table 3), the number of C. albicans CFU in the group with atrophic glossitis was found to be significantly higher (255.6 ± 750.0 CFU) than that in the group without atrophic glossitis (35.2 ± 92.3 CFU) (P < 0.001). The C. glabrata CFU in the group with atrophic glossitis (37.9 ± 115.2 CFU) was significantly lower than that in the group without atrophic glossitis (45.8 ± 278.7 CFU) (P < 0.001).
Table 3

Comparison of variables between absent (Grade 0) and present (Grade1~4) groups of atrophic glossitis

 

Atrophic glossitis

P-value

Grade 0

Grade 1~4

n = 185

n = 46

C. albicans (CFU)

35.2 ± 92.3

255.6 ± 750.0

<0.001

C. glabrata (CFU)

45.8 ± 278.7

37.9 ± 115.2

<0.001

C. tropicalis (CFU)

0.6 ± 5.8

3.9 ± 18.6

0.058

C. krusei (CFU)

0.9 ± 6.3

0.3 ± 1.2

0.974

RSFR (mL/15 min)

2.4 ± 2.7

1.3 ± 2.6

<0.001

SSFR (mL/10 min)

12.2 ± 6.9

7.9 ± 6.4

<0.001

Age

65.4 ± 12.5

71.4 ± 12.0

0.004

Values are expressed as Mean ± SD. P-value, Mann-Whitney U-test

RSFR resting whole salivary flow rate, SSFR stimulated whole salivary flow rate

In the group with atrophic glossitis, the mean RSFR was 1.3 ± 2.6 mL/15 min, while the mean SSFR was 7.9 ± 6.4 mL/10 min. In contrast, in the group without atrophic glossitis, the mean RSFR was 2.4 ± 2.7 mL/15 min, and the mean SSFR was 12.2 ± 6.9 mL/10 min. Thus, both the mean resting (P < 0.001) and stimulated (P < 0.001) saliva flow rates were significantly lower in the patients with atrophic glossitis.

A chi-squared test revealed that the gender of the groups with and without atrophic glossitis did not differ to a statistically significant extent (P = 0.211; Table 4). The chi-squared test also revealed that denture wearing was associated with atrophic glossitis (P = 0.025).
Table 4

Comparison of gender and denture-wearing status between absent (Grade 0) and present (Grade1~4) groups of atrophic glossitis

  

Atrophic glossitis

Total

P-value

Grade 0

Grade 1~4

Gender

Male

37

5

42

0.221

Female

148

41

189

Total

185

46

231

 

Denture

Wearing

67

25

92

0.025

No dentures

118

21

139

Total

185

46

231

 

Values are number of cases. P-value, Chi square test

RSFR resting whole salivary flow rate, SSFR stimulated whole salivary flow rate

Correlations among the colonizing species of Candida, age, and salivary flow rate

Significant relationships were observed between age and the amounts of Candida species as well as between age and the RSFR according to the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (Table 5). Significant relationships were also observed among the Candida species, except between C. albicans and C. krusei, which showed weak relationships. Negative correlations were observed between the amounts of Candida species and the salivary flow rate. There was no significant correlation between C. krusei and the salivary flow rate.
Table 5

Correlations among amount of Candida species, age, and salivary flow rate

 

C. albicans

C. glabrata

C. tropicalis

C. krusei

RSFR

SSFR

Age

0.296**

0.288**

0.175**

0.155*

−0.210**

−0.099

C. albicans

 

0.345**

0.157*

0.039

−0.430**

−0.351**

C. glabrata

  

0.189**

0.246**

−0.320**

−0.269**

C. tropicalis

   

0.178**

−0.248**

−0.278**

C. krusei

    

−0.079

−0.031

RSFR

     

0.701**

SSFR

      

Values represent Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001

RSFR resting whole salivary flow rate, SSFR stimulated whole salivary flow rate

Factors associated with atrophic glossitis

Logistic regression analysis determined the factors that were closely associated with the presence of atrophic glossitis (Table 6). These factors included an increase in C. albicans CFU (Odds ratio, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.001–1.007) and a decrease in SSFR (Odds ratio, 0.919; 95% CI, 0.845–0.999); C. albicans showed the greatest contribution to atrophic tongue. Although C. glabrata was detected in 50 of 135 (37.0%) patients and was the second-most common species after C. albicans (Table 2), C. glabrata was not significantly associated with the presence of atrophic glossitis (Table 6).
Table 6

Predictors of atrophic glossitis -Multivariate logistic regression analysis-

 

Coefficient

P-value

Odds ratio

95% CI

Lower

Upper

Age

0.029

0.135

1.029

0.991

1.069

Gender

0.804

0.196

2.234

0.661

7.549

C. albicans (CFU)

0.004

0.004

1.004

1.001

1.007

C. glabrata (CFU)

−0.001

0.366

0.999

0.996

1.001

C. tropicalis (CFU)

0.015

0.353

1.015

0.983

1.048

C. krusei (CFU)

−0.055

0.581

0.946

0.778

1.151

RSFR (mL/15 min)

0.045

0.675

1.047

0.846

1.295

SSFR (mL/10 min)

−0.085

0.048

0.919

0.845

0.999

Denture

0.364

0.389

1.439

0.629

3.294

Constant

−3.752

0.010

0.023

  

RSFR resting whole salivary flow rate, SSFR stimulated whole salivary flow rate

Gender; female: 1, male: 0, Denture; denture wearing: 1, no dentures: 0

The influences of the stimulated salivary flow rate and denture wearing on the amounts of Candida colonies

Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that denture wearing was not associated with atrophic glossitis (Table 6). The question then arose as to whether denture wearing promoted an increase in the number of C. albicans CFU. We therefore examined the relationships between hyposalivation and denture wearing and the amount of C. albicans using the Kruskal-Wallis H test, followed by multiple comparison testing using the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction (Fig. 2). Both denture-wearing (mean CFU ± standard deviation, 199.6 ± 737.0 CFU) and non-denture-wearing hyposalivation patients (82.5 ± 173.1 CFU) showed a significantly high number of C. albicans colonies compared with the non-denture-wearing normosalivation patients (13.8 ± 42.4 CFU). There was no significant difference in the number of C. albicans colonies between the denture-wearing (64.6 ± 167.6 CFU) and non-denture-wearing normosalivation patients. Similarly, no significant difference in C. albicans colony counts was noted between the denture-wearing and non-denture-wearing hyposalivation patients.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

The associations between salivation and denture-wearing status and C. albicans colonization. The patients were divided into four groups according to their salivation status (normosalivation [Normo; SSFR >10 mL/10 min] or hyposalivation [Hypo; SSFR ≤10 mL/10 min]) and denture-wearing status (denture wearing or no dentures). The bar graph shows the C. albicans colony-forming units (CFU) stratified by salivation and denture-wearing statuses. The columns show the means. The Kruskal-Wallis H test, followed by multiple comparison testing using the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction, was used to test statistical significance

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to clarify the species of Candida that are most strongly associated with the development of Candida-associated atrophic glossitis because recent studies have suggested the importance of NAC pathogenesis in oral candidiasis. Our logistic regression analysis showed an association between increased amounts of C. albicans colonies and atrophic glossitis. However, no significant relationship between NAC and atrophic glossitis was observed.

With regard to the methods that are used to obtain samples from the oral cavity, although an oral rinse method is helpful for quantification, this method does not evaluate localized sites of infection [19]. In the present study, swab testing was used to evaluate local colonization on the dorsum of the tongue. Swab testing is simple to perform and is thought to be useful for quantitative estimation since the results obtained from rinsing and swab methods have been found to be correlated [20, 21]. A chromogenic media-based commercial system, CHROMagar™ Candida, was used for quantitative estimation; this selective and differential medium is used for the isolation and identification of Candida species [19]. The particular advantage of this system is its ability to detect mixed yeast infections in clinical samples [22]. Studies have suggested that C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, and C. krusei can be identified accurately using CHROMagar™ Candida [2326]. Although it has been reported that the dark green appearance of C. dubliniensis can also be reliably distinguished from that of C. albicans [27], a more detailed method, such as molecular fingerprinting, is needed to discriminate between these two species since C. albicans and C. dubliniensis share many phenotypic characteristics [28]. In the present study, no molecular methods were applied; thus, C. dubliniensis colonies could not be distinguished from C. albicans on CHROMagar™ Candida plates. However, C. dubliniensis is an opportunistic oral pathogen that is typically isolated from patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [29]. Since the present study did not include any such patients, there is little concern about the potential for confusion.

C. albicans, but not NAC, proved to be associated with atrophic glossitis in the present study. This result was consistent with the observations reported by Terai et al. [5, 30], who found that C. albicans is predominantly detected as a single infection. The detection of NAC or a mixed flora consisting of C. albicans and NAC is therefore limited in patients with atrophic glossitis. Although C. glabrata was detected in 50 of the 135 (37.0%) patients with Candida, the second-most common isolated species after C. albicans (Table 2), no significant association was observed between C. glabrata and atrophic glossitis (Table 6). Since the clinical manifestation of erythematous candidiasis is related to the proteinase production capacity of C. albicans [31], a low level of protease secretion might explain why C. glabrata did not contribute to atrophic glossitis.

The virulence factors of Candida include adherence, evasion of the host defenses, and the invasion and destruction of host tissue [1]. Hyphae penetrate perpendicularly, traversing the surface epithelium up to the spinous cell layer [32]. The tip of the penetrating hyphae is known to be rich in proteinases, lipases, and several other enzymes. C. glabrata is unable to grow in filamentous forms and cannot invade the epithelial layer [33]. In contrast to other Candida species, the amounts of secreted aspartyl proteinases (SAPs) and phospholipases (PLs) produced by C. glabrata are extremely low [11, 34]. In C. albicans and C. glabrata mixed infections, C. albicans promotes the penetration of C. glabrata into the oral epithelium as C. glabrata cannot do so alone [33]. Once C. albicans penetrates the epithelial layer, the final step in the infection process is damage, which is characterized by the loss of the superficial epithelium [35]. C. albicans induces both apoptosis and necrosis in the oral epithelial cells [36]. In a study using reconstituted human oral epithelia, the hyphal elements of C. albicans invaded and led to marked disorganization of the epithelium [33]. In contrast, C. glabrata induced less epithelial damage [33]. Different levels of epithelial loss, namely, the severity of atrophic glossitis, may be related to the levels of disorganization of the epithelium. The removal of the keratin layer by oral dynamics, i.e., the movement of the tongue and other muscles, might be enhanced in certain situations, especially in patients with hyposalivation, due to the reduced lubricant function of the saliva. Erythematous candidiasis is the most prevalent variant in patients with hyposalivation [37]. Furthermore, in the present study, a logistic regression analysis revealed that a low SSFR was associated with atrophic glossitis (Table 6).

High vascularity is a characteristic finding of erythematous candidiasis in addition to epithelial atrophy or a lack of a keratinized epithelial surface layer [32]. One hypothesis regarding the mechanism underlying these findings is that erythematous candidiasis is accompanied by the activation of a partially reactive defense mechanism and that it may represent a clinical expression in response to candidal antigens [38, 39]. Because patients with systemic immunosuppressive diseases were excluded from the present study, the oral mucosa in the patients was presumed to be immunocompetent. Atrophic glossitis may be induced even in patients with normal immunity; as such, factors other than immunosuppression, such as hyposalivation, are necessary for the establishment of atrophic glossitis. With its thin epithelial layers, the oral mucous membrane might be sensitized to react to Candida and other virulence factors, thereby causing inflammation.

A chi-square test revealed that denture wearing was associated with the presence of atrophic glossitis (Table 4). The influence of salivation and denture wearing on Candida colony counts was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The number of C. albicans colonies (Fig. 2) was found to be significantly higher in the hyposalivation group than in the normosalivation group. This result is in accordance with the findings of a previous study, which demonstrated an inverse association between the salivary flow rate and C. albicans counts in saliva [4042]. However, no significant difference was observed in the amounts of C. albicans colonies between the denture wearers and denture non-wearers. C. glabrata exhibits superior cell surface hydrophobicity and a greater tendency to adhere to the surface of denture acrylic resin than other Candida species [43]. In addition, NAC shows a greater ability to form biofilms on the surface of dental acrylic resin in comparison to C. albicans, while the combination of C. albicans and C. glabrata shows the highest biofilm-forming ability [44]. The morphological differences and growth patterns exhibited by C. albicans and C. glabrata may allow these species to occupy the same location within the oral cavity with limited competition for space, thereby allowing their co-existence [33]. Thus, the presence of Candida on the denture surface is a prominent etiological factor for denture stomatitis [45]. However, there seems to be no correlation between the colonization of Candida on the mucosal surface of the denture base and that on the dorsum of the tongue. Although denture wearers with hyposalivation are considered at substantial risk for oral candidiasis, increased C. albicans colony counts on the dorsum of the tongue is essential for Candida-related atrophic glossitis.

Conclusion

C. albicans was associated with atrophic glossitis in xerostomia patients who had no systemic predisposing factors, indicating that C. albicans remains a treatment target for Candida-related atrophic glossitis.

Abbreviations

NAC: 

Non-albicans Candida

RSFR: 

Resting whole salivary flow rate

SSFR: 

Stimulated whole salivary flow rate

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No specific funding was received for this study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets obtained or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

YN designed the study, performed clinical dental examinations of the patients and drafted the manuscript. SN, MR, KY, and IS performed clinical dental examinations of the patients and drafted the manuscript. NM performed the microbiological analyses. YY and HI participated in the analysis and interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript. Statistical analyses were performed by KY and AT. All authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All patients provided written informed consent. The Ethics Committee at Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine approved this study (approval number 244, Aug. 19, 2004, and approval number 521, Mar. 21, 2008).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Pathophysiology., Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Tsurumi University Dental Hospital, 2-1-3 Tsurumi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama 230-8501, Japan
(2)
Department of Oral Microbiology, Tsurumi University, School of Dental Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
(3)
Kobayashi Dental Clinic, Niigata, Japan
(4)
Community Dentistry, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
(5)
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Sagami Women’s University, Sagamihara, Japan
(6)
Department of Dentomaxillofacial Diagnosis and Treatment, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Kanagawa Dental University, Yokosuka, Japan
(7)
Department of Pathology, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Yokohama, Japan

References

  1. Williams D, Lewis M. Pathogenesis and treatment of oral candidosis. J Oral Microbiol. 2011;3:5771. doi:10.3402/jom.v3i0.5771.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ellepola AN, Samaranayake LP. Oral candidal infections and antimycotics. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2000;11(2):172–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Reamy BV, Derby R, Bunt CW. Common tongue conditions in primary care. Am Fam Physician. 2010;81(5):627–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kurnatowska AJ. Search for correlation between symptoms and signs of changes in the oral mucosa and presence of fungi. Mycoses. 2001;44(9–10):379–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Terai H, Shimahara M. Atrophic tongue associated with Candida. J Oral Pathol Med. 2005;34(7):397–400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Terai H, Shimahara M. Partial atrophic tongue other than median rhomboid glossitis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007;32(4):381–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kimori H, Yamamoto K, Yamachika S, Tsurumoto A, Kamikawa Y, Sasao M, Morito M, Saito I, Ohshima T, Maeda N, et al. Factors associated with the presence of atrophic tongue in patients with dry mouth. Gerodontology. 2015;32(1):13–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shinozaki S, Moriyama M, Hayashida JN, Tanaka A, Maehara T, Ieda S, Nakamura S. Close association between oral Candida species and oral mucosal disorders in patients with xerostomia. Oral Dis. 2012;18(7):667–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hertel M, Schmidt-Westhausen AM, Strietzel FP. Local, systemic, demographic, and health-related factors influencing pathogenic yeast spectrum and antifungal drug administration frequency in oral candidiasis: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(7):1477–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Muadcheingka T, Tantivitayakul P. Distribution of Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species in oral candidiasis patients: correlation between cell surface hydrophobicity and biofilm forming activities. Arch Oral Biol. 2015;60(6):894–901.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rodrigues CF, Silva S, Henriques M. Candida glabrata: a review of its features and resistance. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(5):673–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Samaranayake YH, Samaranayake LP. Candida krusei: biology, epidemiology, pathogenicity and clinical manifestations of an emerging pathogen. J Med Microbiol. 1994;41(5):295–310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fidel PL Jr, Vazquez JA, Sobel JD. Candida glabrata: review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to C. albicans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(1):80–96.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Coco BJ, Bagg J, Cross LJ, Jose A, Cross J, Ramage G. Mixed Candida albicans and Candida glabrata populations associated with the pathogenesis of denture stomatitis. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2008;23(5):377–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, Moutsopoulos HM, Alexander EL, Carsons SE, Daniels TE, Fox PC, Fox RI, Kassan SS, et al. Classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61(6):554–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Sreebny LM, Valdini A. Xerostomia. Part I: relationship to other oral symptoms and salivary gland hypofunction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988;66(4):451–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Okamoto MR, Kamoi M, Yamachika S, Tsurumoto A, Imamura T, Yamamoto K, Kadomatsu S, Saito I, Maeda N, Nakagawa Y. Efficacy of Fungiflora Y staining for the diagnosis of oral erythematous candidiasis. Gerodontology. 2013;30(3):220–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fujibayashi T, Sugai S, Miyasaka N, Hayashi Y, Tsubota K. Revised Japanese criteria for Sjögrens syndrome (1999): availability and validity. Mod Rheumatol. 2004;14:425–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Williams DW, Lewis MA. Isolation and identification of Candida from the oral cavity. Oral Dis. 2000;6(1):3–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kimori H, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto K, Oshima T. Establishing the cut-off point for the Candida swab test for daily oral care in dry mouth patients. Oral Ther Pharmacol. 2009;28(1):17–25.Google Scholar
  21. Tooyama H, Matsumoto T, Hayashi K, Kurashina K, Kurita H, Uchida M, Kasuga E, Honda T. Candida concentrations determined following concentrated oral rinse culture reflect clinical oral signs. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:150.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Neppelenbroek KH, Seo RS, Urban VM, Silva S, Dovigo LN, Jorge JH, Campanha NH. Identification of Candida species in the clinical laboratory: a review of conventional, commercial, and molecular techniques. Oral Dis. 2014;20(4):329–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Powell HL, Sand CA, Rennie RP. Evaluation of CHROMagar Candida for presumptive identification of clinically important Candida species. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998;32(3):201–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pfaller MA, Houston A, Coffmann S. Application of CHROMagar Candida for rapid screening of clinical specimens for Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida krusei, and Candida (Torulopsis) glabrata. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34(1):58–61.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Odds FC, Bernaerts R. CHROMagar Candida, a new differential isolation medium for presumptive identification of clinically important Candida species. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32(8):1923–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Beighton D, Ludford R, Clark DT, Brailsford SR, Pankhurst CL, Tinsley GF, Fiske J, Lewis D, Daly B, Khalifa N, et al. Use of CHROMagar Candida medium for isolation of yeasts from dental samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33(11):3025–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Campanha NH, Neppelenbroek KH, Spolidorio DM, Spolidorio LC, Pavarina AC. Phenotypic methods and commercial systems for the discrimination between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis. Oral Dis. 2005;11(6):392–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Neppelenbroek KH, Campanha NH, Spolidorio DM, Spolidorio LC, Seo RS, Pavarina AC. Molecular fingerprinting methods for the discrimination between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis. Oral Dis. 2006;12(3):242–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sullivan DJ, Westerneng TJ, Haynes KA, Bennett DE, Coleman DC. Candida dubliniensis sp. nov.: phenotypic and molecular characterization of a novel species associated with oral candidosis in HIV-infected individuals. Microbiology. 1995;141(Pt 7):1507–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Terai H, Shimahara M. Usefulness of culture test and direct examination for the diagnosis of oral atrophic candidiasis. Int J Dermatol. 2009;48(4):371–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Aleva NA, Birman EG, Afonso W Jr, Chavasco JK, Paula CR, Ribeiro A, Pereira LJ. Erythematous candidosis in patients with complete dentures and HIV+/AIDS. Mycoses. 2007;50(5):407–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Reichart PA, Samaranayake LP, Philipsen HP. Pathology and clinical correlates in oral candidiasis and its variants: a review. Oral Dis. 2000;6(2):85–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Silva S, Henriques M, Hayes A, Oliveira R, Azeredo J, Williams DW. Candida glabrata and Candida albicans co-infection of an in vitro oral epithelium. J Oral Pathol Med. 2011;40(5):421–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sanita PV, Zago CE, Mima EG, Pavarina AC, Jorge JH, Machado AL, Vergani CE. In vitro evaluation of the enzymatic activity profile of non-albicans Candida species isolated from patients with oral candidiasis with or without diabetes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;118(1):84–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tang SX, Moyes DL, Richardson JP, Blagojevic M, Naglik JR. Epithelial discrimination of commensal and pathogenic Candida albicans. Oral Dis. 2016;22(Suppl 1):114–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Villar CC, Zhao XR. Candida albicans induces early apoptosis followed by secondary necrosis in oral epithelial cells. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2010;25(3):215–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rhodus NL, Bloomquist C, Liljemark W, Bereuter J. A comparison of three methods for detecting Candida albicans in patients with Sjogren’s syndrome. Quintessence Int. 1998;29(2):107–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Romagnoli P, Pimpinelli N, Mori M, Reichart PA, Eversole LR, Ficarra G. Immunocompetent cells in oral candidiasis of HIV-infected patients: an immunohistochemical and electron microscopical study. Oral Dis. 1997;3(2):99–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Eversole LR, Reichart PA, Ficarra G, Schmidt-Westhausen A, Romagnoli P, Pimpinelli N. Oral keratinocyte immune responses in HIV-associated candidiasis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;84(4):372–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Torres SR, Peixoto CB, Caldas DM, Silva EB, Akiti T, Nucci M, de Uzeda M. Relationship between salivary flow rates and Candida counts in subjects with xerostomia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93(2):149–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Epstein JB, Pearsall NN, Truelove EL. Quantitative relationships between Candida albicans in saliva and the clinical status of human subjects. J Clin Microbiol. 1980;12(3):475–6.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Navazesh M, Wood GJ, Brightman VJ. Relationship between salivary flow rates and Candida albicans counts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;80(3):284–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Luo G, Samaranayake LP. Candida glabrata, an emerging fungal pathogen, exhibits superior relative cell surface hydrophobicity and adhesion to denture acrylic surfaces compared with Candida albicans. APMIS. 2002;110(9):601–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pathak AK, Sharma S, Shrivastva P. Multi-species biofilm of Candida albicans and non-Candida Albicans Candida species on acrylic substrate. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(1):70–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Altarawneh S, Bencharit S, Mendoza L, Curran A, Barrow D, Barros S, Preisser J, Loewy ZG, Gendreau L, Offenbacher S. Clinical and histological findings of denture stomatitis as related to intraoral colonization patterns of Candida albicans, salivary flow, and dry mouth. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(1):13–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement