Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluation of serum zinc levels in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS)

  • Zuzanna Ślebioda1Email author,
  • Ewa Krawiecka1,
  • Elżbieta Szponar1 and
  • Barbara Dorocka-Bobkowska1
BMC Oral HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:158

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0450-x

Received: 6 September 2016

Accepted: 10 December 2017

Published: 20 December 2017

Abstract

Background

Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is an ulcerative disease of the oral mucosa without a clearly defined etiology. The aim of the study was to evaluate the serum zinc levels in patients with RAS in comparison to healthy controls and to validate the association between zinc levels and the course of RAS.

Methods

Seventy-five patients with RAS and 72 controls underwent full dental examination. Serum zinc levels were determined by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (F AAS). The results were statistically analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, chi-square tests and the test of difference between the two rates of structure with p < 0.05 as a significance level (Statistica 10, StatSoft®).

Results

No statistically significant differences were detected in serum zinc levels between RAS patients and healthy controls. The mean serum zinc concentration was found to be 84.2 μg/dL in RAS group and 83.9 μd/dL in controls, within the accepted norms. Zinc deficiency was observed in 10.7% patients from the RAS group and in 6.9% controls. No significant differences in serum zinc levels were found between patients when the course of the disease was considered.

Conclusions

Serum zinc concentrations did not differ significantly in RAS patients and in healthy controls and it did not influence the course of the disease. Therefore, zinc does not appear to be an important modifying factor in the development of RAS.

Keywords

Recurrent aphthous stomatitisZincOral mucosaOral diseases

Background

Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is a chronic, ulcerative condition of the oral mucosa without a fully recognized etiology [1, 2]. The current research suggests that genetically conditioned abnormal immune response triggered by various local and systemic factors, plays an essential role in the disease [1, 3]. An abnormally initiated cascade of proinflammatory cytokines acting against the host mucosa leads to the formation of massive leukocytic infiltration and local tissue damage [1]. Disruption of the humoral and cellular immune response in patients with RAS results in an elevated concentration of a complement of species: increased number of NK (natural killer) cells and B lymphocytes, disrupted CD4/CD8 (cluster of differentiation 4/8) ratio, increased number of CD25 (cluster of differentiation 25) and TCR (T cell receptor) ɣδ cells in peripheral blood and hyper-reactivity of neutrophils [46].

RAS is characterized by the presence of painful, oval erosions or ulcers generally localized on the unattached oral mucosa of the lips, cheeks and tongue, which are surrounded by an erythematous halo. Lesions reappear frequently and to date now there has been no effective causative treatment available [13]. According to Stanley, the three main types of the disease can be described: major (MaRAS), minor (MiRAS) and herpetiform (HeRAS). The classification criteria include the size and the depth of the lesion, the number of lesions in one episode, their location and duration [1]. Most commonly observed type is minor, where the diameter of lesion varies between 5 and 10 mm. The number of eruptions per one flare-up in this type does not normally exceed 10, while the healing lasts for 10 to 14 days. This form affects from 75 to 90% of all patients with RAS. Major type is found in 10 to 15% of RAS subjects and usually develops as a single ulcer with a diameter over 1 cm, located on keratinized or non-keratinized oral mucosa. The healing phase lasts longer than in case of MiRAS and may take up to 1 month. This form is considered as the most severe one. The least common type is herpetiform RAS, where the crucial finding is the presence of multiple, small, short-lasting erosions that spread throughout the oral cavity, healing within 14 days without leaving a scar [1, 2]. The presence of recurrent oral aphthae accompanied by genital ulcers and uveitis is a characteristic of a systemic condition called Behçet’s disease, which may also involve some other visceral organs [7, 8].

Depending on the diagnostic criteria, the condition affects between 10 and 20% of the general population. The peak period of the RAS occurrence is the second life decade. A higher incidence among females, non-smokers, white races and people with a high socio-economic status has also been reported in some studies [1, 2].

Minor aphthae on the lower lip are presented on Fig. 1.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Minor aphthae on the lower lip

Zinc is an essential, biologically active, trace metal in the human body. It acts as co-enzymatic and activator of almost 100 human enzymes. It participates in the metabolism of lipids, proteins and carbohydrates, regulates RNA and DNA biosynthesis, modifies the growth and development of epithelium and helps to maintain the correct serum vitamin A concentration [911]. Zinc levels have been shown to affect the immune response; for example in Zn deficiency, interleukin 2 (IL-2) secretion is limited and the number of T1- helper lymphocytes (Th1) is reduced. Zinc exhibits anti-oxidative properties by inhibiting the oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids. Zinc deficiency is characterized by a broad spectrum of clinical symptoms that include: impaired growth and maturation, loss of appetite and insufficient body weight, pathologic skin lesions (eczema, stretch striae), impaired healing, vision disturbances, signs of accelerated aging, psychiatric and neurosensoric disturbances, reduced resistance to infections and elevated risk of diabetes due to increased glucose tolerance [912]. Zinc deficiency has been reported in patients with various systemic conditions such as: psoriasis, acne vulgaris, pernicious anemia, tuberculosis and cirrhosis [1216].

A correlation of zinc levels in human body with some oral mucosa diseases has been already suggested, especially those with a potential autoimmune background, such as lichen planus and geographic tongue [1621]. Although the etiology of RAS remains still not fully recognized, the presence of antibodies for different antigens of the epithelium in patients with aphthae also suggests an autoimmune character of the disease [3]. The role of several immunomodulators in the development of the condition has been recently considered. Primary immune abnormalities and immune system disruption observed in RAS patients may partially result from nutrient deficiencies that include iron, folic acid, and vitamin B group [1, 2, 11, 14]. The potential role of zinc deficiency as the modifier of the RAS course may result from the ability of zinc to stimulate the production of IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and separated monocytes. It was observed that the cytokines production becomes disrupted in zinc deficient subjects- low zinc serum levels correlate with a reduced production of Th1-type cytokines [9]. Meanwhile, the local tissue damage at the initial stage of aphtha formation occurs in the response to an abnormally stimulated cascade of cytokines [3, 4]. Several authors also suggest that Th1-type immunologic response plays an essential role in the etiopathogenesis of RAS [3]. Therefore recently, due to its proven immunoregulating and regenerating properties, zinc has raised a considerable interest as the potential trigger of the RAS development and modifier of its course. Deviations in serum zinc levels could on one hand influence the risk of the disease, but on the other hand it could also affect the course of RAS by promoting more severe forms like MaRAS in zinc deficient subjects.

The aim of the present study was to compare serum zinc levels in patients with RAS and in a group of healthy controls and to evaluate its effects on the disease severity.

Methods

This is a case-control study conducted in Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PUMS) in Poland between September 2013 and April 2015. Seventy five patients with RAS from the Great Poland region, including 46 females and 29 males with a mean age of 35.08 ± 16.9 years were enrolled in the study. All had at least a 1-year history of the disease and a regular mode of recurrences, defined as at least two episodes per year. The control group consisted of 72 participants with no evidence and/or clinical history of RAS, 53 females and 19 males with a mean age 32.2 ± 14.3 years, recruited from the patients, students and stuff members of PUMS. Demographic characteristic of the study and control group is presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Characteristic of the RAS and control group

 

Total

Age

Mean ± SD

Females

♀Age

Mean ± SD

Males

♂Age

Mean ± SD

RAS

75

8–82

35 ± 17

46

9–82

34 ± 17

29

8–68

37 ± 17

Control

72

1–79

31 ± 15

53

19–79

33 ± 14

19

1–68

31 ± 17

P

  

0.4215

  

0.9805

  

0.2853

The exclusion criteria included the presence of an ulcerative oral mucosa disease other than RAS and current immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment. After recording a detailed medical history of all the participants, a full extra- and intraoral examination was performed by a qualified dental specialist (ZŚ). RAS was confirmed in all of the subjects from the study group during the visit. Depending on the type of aphthae, patients from the study group were divided into MiRAS, MaRAS and HeRAS subgroups. Diagnostic criteria included the size of the lesion, number of eruptions in a single flare-up and healing time. Additionally, based on the mode of recurrences, subjects were assigned to a mild, moderate or severe RAS course subgroup. The latter classification, based on the patients’ self-report, was proposed by Bagan et al.; type 1 disease is characterized by the intervals between the flare-ups of over 3 months, while in the type 2 disease the flare-ups occur at one to 3 month intervals. In type 3 aphthous lesions are present almost continuously [22]. Depending on the number of lesions per episode, the RAS patients were classified as group A (1–3 lesions per episode) or group B (over 3 lesions per episode). Blood samples were collected to determine the serum zinc concentration in all participants. The zinc concentration was measured by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (F AAS; Jena AG; ZEEnit700E) using an analytical method described by Arora et al. [12], Khademi and Shaikhiany [19], Orbak et al. [23] and Özler [24]. The results were statistically analyzed with non-parametric tests, as the data were not normally distributed according to Shapiro-Wilk normality test. Kruskal-Wallis test was utilized to compare mean serum zinc levels in Mi-, Ma- and HeRAS subgroups as in mild, moderate and severe RAS subgroups. We used Mann-Whitney test to compare the mean serum zinc levels in A and B subgroups. Chi-square test was used to assess the independence of variables between the study subgroups and the serum zinc level described as low, normal or high. The test of difference between the two rates of structure was utilized to compare the frequency of zinc deficiency between the study subgroups. In all tests p < 0.05 was considered as a significance level (Statistica 10, StatSoft®).

Results

The mean serum zinc concentration was found to be 84.2 ± 13.49 μg/dL in the RAS group and 83.9 ± 10 μg/dL in the control group. The difference assessed by Mann-Whitney test was not statistically significant (p = 0.7154). Zinc deficiency defined as a serum Zn concentration < 70 μg/dl was observed in 8 (10.7%) patients with RAS and in 5 (6.9%) of the control group (the difference was statistically insignificant; p = 0.4259). Low serum zinc concentrations defined as Zn level between 70 and 80 μd/dl was found in 18 (26.7%) of RAS patients and in 20 (25.0%) of the control group which was statistically insignificant difference (p = 0.8246). There was also no significant difference between RAS and controls when a combined study group (“deficiency” + “low zinc” subgroups) was considered (26 patients; 37.3% in RAS group vs. 25 patients; 31.9% in control group; p = 0.4669). However, generally lower zinc concentrations were observed in the RAS group compared to the control group. Zinc concentrations above the upper norm were observed in 2 RAS patients (1.4%) and in none of the control group. No differentiation between the study groups was apparent in terms of zinc serum concentrations as determined by the chi-square test analysis (p = 0.4061).

The most commonly observed type of aphthae in the study group was MiRAS (56 patients, 74.7%). MaRAS was found in 14 (18.7%) and HeRAS in 5 (6.7%) subjects. The mean serum zinc concentrations in MiRAS, MaRAS and HeRAS subgroups were 83.5 ± 10.2 μg/dL, 80 ± 10.15 μg/dL and 103.8 ± 32.3 μg/d, respectively, but the differences were considered statistically insignificant (p = 0.2855). Low zinc levels or zinc deficiency was revealed in 21 (37.5%) MiRAS patients, 6 (42.9%) MaRAS and in 1 (20%) HeRAS subject. The differences in frequency of low Zn and Zn deficiency between the most numerous MiRAS subgroup and the subgroups with other types of aphthae was considered statistically insignificant (p = 0.8730).

Based on the frequency of episodes the course of RAS was classified as mild (episodes with more than 3-month intervals), observed in 27 (36%) patients, moderate (episodes with 1–3 month intervals), found in 33 (44%) subjects and severe (lesions present almost constantly), revealed in 15 (20%) patients from the study group. The mean serum zinc concentrations in these subgroups were: 87.6 ± 18.8 μg/dL, 82.1 ± 7.5 μg/dL and 82.8 ± 12.1 μg/dL, respectively. The differences between these levels were not considered significant (p = 0.5032). There was no association between the course of RAS and serum zinc concentration (p = 0.3912). Low zinc levels or zinc deficiency occurred in 9 (33.3%) patients with mild-type RAS, in 14 (42.4%) moderate-type RAS patients and in 5 (33.3%) subjects with severe type of RAS. The differences were also considered to be statistically insignificant.

Fifty-nine RAS patients (78.7%) were assigned to the A subgroup, where 1 to 3 lesions appeared during one episode. The remaining 16 subjects (21.3%) were classified as B subgroup with over 3 lesions per episode. The mean serum zinc concentrations in these subgroups were: 83.1 ± 10.6 μg/dL and 88.2 ± 21.1 μg/dL, respectively with the difference being statistically insignificant (p = 0729). Low zinc levels or zinc deficiency was found in 22 (37.3%) patients from the A subgroup and in 6 (37.5%) patients from the B subgroup (the difference being statistically insignificant; p = 0.9824). The results are presented in Table 2 and on Fig. 2.
Table 2

Mean serum zinc concentrations in the RAS study group divided into RAS subtypes and in controls

 

Zn [μg/dL] Mean ± SD

p

95% CI

Power of the sample

RAS

84.2 ± 13.5

p = 0.7154

81.1–87.3

0.054

Controls

83.9 ± 10.0

81.5–86.2

RAS subgroups

 MiRAS

83.5 ± 10.2

p = 0.2855

80.8–86.3

0.066

 MaRAS

80.0 ± 10.1

74.1–85.9

 HeRAS

103.8 ± 32.3

63.7–143.9

 Mild-type

87.6 ± 18.8

p = 0.5032

80.2–95.0

0.089

 Moderate-type

82.1 ± 7.5

79.4–84.7

 Severe-type

82.8 ± 12.1

76.1–89.5

 A type

83.1 ± 10.6

p = 0.7929

80.4–89.5

0.431

 B type

88.2 ± 21.1

76.9–99.4

Legend:

MiRAS- subgroup with minor aphthous stomatitis

MaRAS- subgroup with major aphthous stomatitis

HeRAS- subgroup with herpetiform aphthous stomatitis

Mild-type- subgroup with mild course of RAS, defined as having episodes less frequently than 3-month intervals

Moderate-type- subgroup with moderate course of RAS, defined as having episodes with 1–3 month intervals

Severe-type- subgroup with severe course of RAS, defined as with lesions almost constantly present

A type- subgroup with 1–3 lesions per episode

B type- subgroup with more than 3 lesions per episode

Figure 2
Fig. 2

Mean serum zinc levels in patients with Mi-, Ma- and HeRAS

Discussion

Aphthous ulcers form in response to an enhanced immunologic reaction against the oral mucosa [3, 25]. An abnormally initiated cascade of cytokines followed by the activation of certain immune processes leads to local tissue damage and inflammation [3, 4, 25]. The disruption of the immune system in RAS predisposed subjects occurs in response to some kind of undefined factors. This may include exposure to viral and bacterial antigens or to some food ingredients, stress or local trauma. The modifying role of certain microelement deficiencies in RAS development has been the subject of several studies, the results however have been rather conflicting. The deficiency in hematins (iron, folic acid, vitamin B12) in RAS subjects was revealed by Khan et al. [26], Lopez-Jornet et al. [27], Natah et al. [1], Scully and Porter [25], and Volkov et al. [28]. However in several other studies the supplementation of deficient microelements modified the course of the disease in only a small percentage of patients (Porter et al. [29]; Nolan et al. [30]; Lalla et al. [31]; Haisraeli-Shalish et al. [32]).

In the present study we have attempted to evaluate the potential role of zinc deficiency as an RAS course modifier. As mentioned in the introduction, zinc deficiency arises with a change in cytokine production [9]. Moreover, low zinc serum levels correlate with a reduced production of Th1-type cytokines [9], while the Th1-type immunologic response is involved in the etiopathogenesis of RAS [3, 25].

The results of our research did not show significant differences in serum zinc levels between RAS patients and generally healthy control subjects. In both groups the mean serum zinc concentrations were within the normal range. The incidence of “deficiency” and “low zinc” patients was similar in both: study and control groups (37.3% vs. 31.9% p = 0.4669), with slightly lower zinc concentrations in RAS group compared to the control group. In the Orbak et al. study (2003) low zinc levels were detected in 17 of the 40 examined subjects with RAS (42.5%). However, it should be noted that the authors considered a low zinc concentration as the level below 95 μg/dL, while the norm we suggest ranges from 70 to 100 μg/dL, with a concentration below 70 μg/dL defined as Zn deficiency and levels between 70 and 80 μg/dL defined as low Zn concentrations. In the Orbak study the administration of zinc sulphate in a dose of 220 mg once daily per month resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the frequency of disease recurrence when compared to the subgroup treated with placebo [23]. A reduction in the disease episode frequency was also observed by Endre (1991) who described a 15-years old patient with RAS. His condition improved after a 3-month therapy with zinc sulfate administered orally three times daily in a dose of 50 mg [33]. Some beneficial effects of zinc therapy on the course of RAS were described by Merchant et al. (1977) and by Sharquie et al. (2008) [34, 35]. However, the Wray study (1982) did not confirm any advantages of zinc administration in RAS patients, who also underwent 3-month zinc supplementation [36].

In agreement with our research, Khademi and Shaikhiany (2006), who examined 44 RAS subjects and 44 healthy controls, observed higher serum zinc levels in the control group, but generally in both examined groups the mean zinc levels remained within normal values [19]. No differences in Zn serum levels between RAS and control groups were reported by Arora et al. [12]. Meanwhile, Erel et al. (2003) observed higher serum zinc levels in a study group of 30 patients with Behçet’s disease- a condition characterized by the presence of oral and genital aphthae accompanied by various systemic symptoms- than in 20 healthy controls, but no differences were detected between the patients in the active phase of the disease and in remission [7]. In contrast, significantly lower serum Zn levels were observed in RAS patients compared to healthy controls in the Ozturk et al. study [10].

Experimental studies on rats also revealed that a zinc-deficient diet may affect the oral mucosa and periodontal status. Animals on a zinc-free diet showed a higher incidence of oral ulcers than the control group [37]. Kim et al., who investigated the effects of zinc in a phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA)-treated inflammatory model on human gingival fibroblast cells (hGFs), demonstrated that zinc supplement treatment reduced the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and decreased the cyclooxygenease-2 (COX-2) expression and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) release. It was concluded that the zinc treatment resulted in the mitigation of oral inflammation [38].

Conclusions

The results of several studies indicate that zinc may be at least partially involved in the initiation of RAS or may influence its course and severity. In our research none significant differences were found between the study group and the controls or between the RAS sub-groups. Serum zinc levels did not vary between the patients with more severe types of aphthae (MaRAS) and with less severe forms (MiRAS, HeRAS); it did not influence the mode of recurrences nor the number of lesions per one flare-up.

As described above, the MiRAS patients constituted the core of our study population, while MaRAS and HeRAS were found in 18.7 and 6.7% subjects, respectively. It remains in accordance with the frequency of these types of aphthae in a general population. However, considering the sample size of our study, it makes the MaRAS and HeRAS subgroups not very representative. We are aware of several limitations of this study. The number of patients we managed to examine resulted from the limited study period; also the heterogeneity of our study group, especially in terms of their gender and age was quite high, which could have influence our results. For those reasons the power of the study sample size, as presented in the Table 2, was relatively low. As the risk of false negative results is high in low-powered studies, for more conclusive results a longitudinal research on a larger patients’ sample would be required.

The etiopathogenesis of RAS seems to be due to many genetic, immunologic and environmental factors. Research into zinc supplementation in the treatment of RAS patients has shown some beneficial effects of oral Zn administration. Therefore zinc therapy could be considered as a supportive treatment for RAS. However, in view of the results of our study, further investigations are required to determine if zinc supplementation should be regularly used in the treatment of RAS.

Abbreviations

CD4, 8, 25: 

Cluster of differentiation 4, 8, 25

F AAS: 

Flame atomic absorption spectroscopy

HeRAS: 

Herpetiform recurrent aphthous stomatitis

IL-1, 2, 6: 

Interleukin 1, 2, 6

MaRAS: 

Major recurrent aphthpus stomatitis

MiRAS: 

Minor recurrent aphthous stomatitis

NK: 

Natural killer cells

RAS: 

Recurrent aphthous stomatitis

TCR: 

T cell receptor

Th1: 

T1 helper lymphocytes

TNF-α: 

Tumour necrosis factor alpha

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The study was supported by a project funded by University of Medical Sciences in Poznań (grant number: 502–14–02209325-09854; grant holder: Zuzanna Ślebioda).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

ZŚ was a member of a dental team and a major contributor in writing the manuscript, she also analyzed and interpreted the results. EK was a member of a dental team and a person responsible for the statistical analysis. ES designed the study and revised the manuscript. BDB was responsible for data checking and analysis, coordination of the clinical study performance, critical revision, and approving the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All adult participants signed an informed consent form and were enrolled voluntarily in the study. In children under 16 years of age the informed written consent to participate in the study was obtained from their parents/guardians. In addition, minors able to give assent (over 10 years old) provided a written consent to take part in this study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Poznań University of Medical Sciences in Poland (reference No 540/14, with subsequent amendments No 868/14).

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

A written permission was provided by the individual depicted on Fig. 1 to use and publish the image.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Gerodontology and Oral Pathology, University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland

References

  1. Natah SS, Konttinen YT, Enattah NS, Ashammakhi N, Sharkey KA, Häyrinen-Immonen R. Recurrent aphthous ulcers today: a review of the growing knowledge. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;33:221–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Shashy RG, Ridley MB. Aphthous ulcers: a difficult clinical entity. Am J Otolaryngol. 2000;21:389–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lewkowicz N, Lewkowicz P, Kurnatowska A, Banasik M, Glowacka E, Cedzyński M, et al. Innate immune system is implicated in recurrent aphthous ulcer pathogenesis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2003;32:475–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Borra RC, Andrade PM, Silva ID, Morgun A, Weckx LL, Smirnova AS, Franco M. The Th1/Th2 immune type response of the recurrent aphthous ulceration analyzed by cDNA microarray. J Oral Pathol Med. 2004;33:140–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Eversole LR. Immunopathogenesis of oral lichen planus and recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 1997;16:284–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eversole LR. Immunopathology of oral mucosal ulcerative, desquamative, and bullous diseases: selective review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1994;77:555–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Erel A, Özsoy E, Biberoğlu G, Bilgihan A, Hasanoğlu A, Yis MO, et al. Serum levels of vitamins a, C and E, β-carotene, selenium and zinc in patients with Behcet’s disease. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2003;95:97–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Najim RA, Sharquie KE, Abu-Raghif AR. Oxidative stress in patients with Behcet’s disease: I correlation with severity and clinical parameters. J Dermatol. 2007;34:308–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Puzanowska-Tarasiewicz H, Kuźmicka L, Tarasiewicz M. Biological function of some elements and their compounds. III. Zinc- component and activator of enzymes. Pol Merkuriusz Lek. 2009;161:419–22.Google Scholar
  10. Ozturk P, Belge Kurutas E, Ataseven A. Copper/zinc and copper/selenium ratios, and oxidative stress as biochemical markers in recurrent aphthous stomatitis. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2013;27(4):312–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Thomas DM, Mirowski GW. Nutrition and oral mucosal diseases. Clin Dermatol. 2010;28:426–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Arora PN, Dhillon KS, Rajan SR, Sayal SK, Das AL. Serum zinc level in cutaneous disorders. Armed Forces Med J India. 2002;58:304–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Al-Jebory AAOH. Serum zinc in psoriatic patients. Mustansiriya Med J. 2012;11(2):20–3.Google Scholar
  14. Alobaidi AH, Mothana Z, Najem WS, Alsamarai AM. Adiponectin, IL-10, IL-23 and trace elements serum levels in patients with psoriasis. American Journal of Dermatology and Venereology. 2012;1(2):6–23.Google Scholar
  15. Butool F, Rekha C, Gnaneswar RA. Clinical study on serum zinc levels in patients with acne vulgaris. Asian J Res Chem. 2013;S.l:464–6.Google Scholar
  16. Ingen-Housz-Oro S, Blanchet-Bardon C, Vrillat M, Dubertret L. Vitamin and trace metal levels in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2004;18:649–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gholizadeh N, Mehdipour M, Najafi S, Bahramiyan A, Garjani S, Khoeini PH. Evaluation of the serum zinc level in erosive and non-erosive oral lichen planus. J Dent (Shiraz). 2014;15(2):52–6.Google Scholar
  18. Khozeimeh F, Jafari N, Attar AM, Jafari S, Ataie M. Comparative analysis of salivary zinc level in recurrent herpes labialis. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012;9(1):19–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Khademi H, Shaikhiany J. Comparison of serum zing level in recurrent patients and normal individuals. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2006;2(2):1–5.Google Scholar
  20. Kleier C, Werkmeister R, Joos U. Zinc and vitamin a deficiency in diseases of the mouth mucosa. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1998;2(6):320–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Maragou P, Ivanyi L. Serum zinc levels in patients with burning mouth syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1991;71(4):447–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Bagan JV, Sanchis JM, Milian MA, Penarrocha M, Silvestre FJ. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis. A study of the clinical characteristics of lesions in 93 cases. Oral Pathol Med. 1991;20:395–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Orbak R, Cicek Y, Tezel A, Dogru Y. Effects of zinc treatment in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Dent Mater. 2003;22(1):21–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Özler GS. Zinc deficiency in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a pilot study. J Laryngol Otol. 2014;128:531–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Scully C, Porter S. Oral mucosal disease: recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:198–206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Khan NF, Saeed M, Chaudhary S, Khan NF. Haematological parameters and recurrent aphthous stomatitis. J Coll Physici. 2013;23:124–7.Google Scholar
  27. Lopez-Jornet P, Camacho-Alonso F, Martos N. Hematological study of patients with aphthous stomatitis. Int J Dermatol. 2014;53(2):159–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Volkov I, Rudoy I, Freud T, Sardal G, Naimer S, Peleg R, et al. Effectiveness of vitamin B12 in treating recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Board Fam Med. 2009;22:9–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Porter S, Flint S, Scully C, Keith C. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis: the efficacy of replacement therapy in patients with underlying hematinic deficiencies. Ann Dent. 1992;51:14–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Nolan A, McIntosh WB, Allam BF, Lamey PJ. Recurrent aphthous ulceration: vitamin B1, B2 and B6 status and response to replacement therapy. J Oral Pathol Med. 1991;20:389–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lalla RV, Choquette LE, Feinn RS, Zawistowski H, Latortue MC, Kelly ET, et al. Multivitamin therapy for recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012;143:370–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Haisraeli-Shalish M, Livneh A, Katz J, Doolman R, Sela BA. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis and thiamine deficiency. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;82:634–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Endre L. Recurrent aphthous ulceration with zinc deficiency and cellular immune deficiency. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1991;72(5):559–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Merchant HW, Gangarosa LP, Glassman AB, Sobel RE. Zinc sulfate supplementation for treatment of recurring oral ulcers. South Med J. 1977;70(5):559–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sharquie KE, Najim RA, Al-Hayani RK, Al-Nuaimy AA, Maroof DM. The therapeutic and prophylactic role of oral zinc sulfate in management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) in comparison with dapsone. Saudi Med J. 2008;29(5):734–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wray D. A double-blind trial of systemic zinc sulfate in recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1982;53(5):469–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Seyedmajidi SA, Seyedmajidi M, Moghadamnia A, Khani Z, Zahedpasha S, Jenabian N, et al. Effect of zinc-deficient diet on oral tissues and periodontal indices in rats. Int J Mol Cell Med. 2014;3(2):82–7.Google Scholar
  38. Kim J, Kim S, Jeon S, Hui Z, Kim Y, Im Y, Lim W, Kim C, Choi H, Kim O. Anti-inflammatory effects of zinc in PMA-treated human gingival fibroblast cells. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015;20(2):e180–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement