Skip to main content

Longitudinal assessment of salivary vitamin D binding protein during orthodontic tooth movement



Vitamin D is critical for bone physiology. In this study, we quantified Vitamin D Binding Protein (VitDBP) levels in saliva as a measure of Vitamin D during orthodontic tooth movement.


In this longitudinal study, saliva samples were collected from 73 orthodontic patients for 4 timepoints for the first six months of orthodontic treatment, along with dental casts at the beginning and the end of the study period. The saliva was measured for VitDBP as a biological marker for bone apposition and clinical tooth movement. We used the absolute change in Little's Irregularity Index as a quantitative measure for alignment. In addition, we measured the levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in saliva as a marker of bone turnover.


Both low (< 2.75 ng/ml) and high (> 6.48 ng/ml) VitDBP levels were associated with reduced tooth movement. Significant (p < 0.05) seasonal changes in VitDBP using a two-season year model were found with lower levels observed in the summer (Apr–Sept) than in the winter (Oct–Mar).


Clinically significant orthodontic tooth movement is associated with an optimal range of VitDBP in saliva. Normal levels of VitDBP correlated with more orthodontic tooth movement, suggesting a "normal" range of salivary content of VitDBP. Given the strong trend that is independent of the confounding factors (ex. age, race or gender), the predictive value or salivary VitDBP for tooth movement should be studied in larger cohorts in future studies.

Peer Review reports


Vitamin D (VitD) plays a significant role in bone biology and remodeling [1]. It regulates calcium absorption and the balance between osteoblasts and osteoclasts [2, 3] by producing type I collagen, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and osteocalcin [2, 4, 5]. There are two primary forms of VitD: 25-OHD (25-hydroxyvitamin D) and 1,25-OHD [6]. After being absorbed as a pre-vitamin, VitD is transported to the liver to become hydroxylated into 25-OHD form, which is considered the dominant circulating form of the vitamin with a half-life of 2–3 weeks [7,8,9,10]. The body transforms the 25-OHD into 1,25-OHD with two hydroxylation sites [11, 12]. 1,25-OHD is considered the active hormonal form with a half-life of 4–6 h; yet, 1,25-OHD does not represent a good indicator of circulating VitD because of its short half-life and levels a thousand-fold less than 25-OHD [3, 9, 10, 13, 14].

VitD Binding Protein (VitDBP), a polymorphic single-chain serum glycoprotein ubiquitously found in body fluids and organs, has a vital role in VitD metabolism [15], binds to, solubilizes, and transports the VitD and its metabolites. Serum VitDBP concentrations and 1,25-OHD levels are positively correlated [15]. The large majority (85–90%) of circulating VitD is bound to VitDBP, 10–15% is loosely bound to serum albumin, and less than 0.03% is found in an unbound and free form [16]. VitDBP has a higher affinity with the 25-OHD form and less with the 1,25-OHD (10–100-fold lower) due to the additional hydroxyl group. VitDBP levels are estimated to be around 20-fold higher than all other VitD forms together [7]. VitDBP is less than 1% saturated, and its serum concentration (6.10−6 M) is substantially higher than the concentration of 25-OHD with more stability (4.10−8 M) [17]. Therefore, VitDBP presents an ideal candidate for the measurement of VitD in body fluids.

While several studies have focused on the association between orthodontic tooth movement and VitD levels, this study addresses the critical gap in knowledge that the orthodontic tooth movement has not been correlated with salivary levels of vitamin D binding protein as a measure of circulating vitamin D. [2, 3, 5, 13, 14, 18, 19]. Since saliva presents a non-invasive and practical biological milieu for biomarker detection, we hypothesized that the VitDBP levels in saliva would correlate with orthodontic tooth movement and bone turnover and that we can measure the predictive value of VitDBP during orthodontic treatment.


Study population

A total of 127 patients were recruited between April 2017 and March 2018 from the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics clinics at the Boston University's Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine after the IRB approval (# H-34695). Seventy-three subjects were included in the final analysis. All subjects were provided with written and oral consent before being included in the study. Participants with any medical conditions that might affect bone metabolism or those taking any VitD supplements were excluded. The treatment plans included extraction and non-extraction cases, braces, clear aligner therapy, and others such as expanders or headgears.

Measurement of alignment as a quantitative phase of orthodontic tooth movement

Impressions and orthodontic records were taken before treatment and 6 months after the start of the study period. Plaster casts were scanned using the Ortho Insight 3D from Motion View LLC., (Chattanooga, Tennessee) scanner and software. Incisor teeth were identified using the software. The mesial and distal contact points were located manually, and Little's Irregularity Index (II) [20] was measured between lower canine to canine for each pre- and post-treatment digital dental model and the absolute difference between them for statistical analysis.

Saliva sampling and analyses

Saliva samples were collected each month for the first 6 months of orthodontic treatment. Of those, four time-points were chosed for analysis representing the the leveling and aligning stage of orthodontic treatment. The first sample was taken during the treatment planning appointment. The last sample was obtained at the end of the 6-month study phase with two samples approximately 2 and 4 months from the beginning of orthodontic treatment. Whole unstimulated saliva was collected in 15 ml polypropylene Falcon tubes at each morning appointment and immediately placed in a − 80 °C freezer. Once the collection was completed, samples were thawed and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatants were aliquoted into 2 ml Eppendorf tubes. The samples collected between April and September were considered to represent "summer," and those between October and March represent "winter."

For the VitDBP measurement, a commercially available kit was used from EMD Millipore (Human Circulating Cancer Biomarker Magnetic Bead Panel 2; Cat. #HCCBP2MAG-58 K) (Burlington, Massachusetts), and samples were run on Luminex® 200™ (Austin, Texas). As a marker of bone-associated changes, we measured the ALP levels in saliva using a colorimetric ALP kit (Abcam; ab83369) (Cambridge, United Kingdom) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Optical density (OD) was measured at 405 nm by spectrophotometry. Enzyme activity was calculated as the OD of the reaction product multiplied by the reaction volume and normalized to the reaction time and the total protein. All samples were run using the same kit and the same batch simultaneously to reduce possible variation, with 10% of the samples repeated to ensure the reliability of measurements.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 software. Before statistical modeling, data were thoroughly checked for potential data entry errors and outliers. Descriptive statistics were summarized using mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and frequency for categorical variables. Mixed linear regression models with random intercept were used to assess the relationship between VitDBP and season. A multiple linear regression model was used to assess the relationship between baseline VitDBP and absolute difference in tooth irregularity measures between baseline and end-of-treatment time-points.


Sample characteristics

A total of 127 patients were recruited for the study; 84 patients completed the study, and 73 of them were included in the final analysis due to multiple missing samples and casts. There were 43 females and 30 males with an age range of 8–63 years and a mean age of 21.5 ± 11.1 years. The adult (≥ 18 years old; n = 36) to child (< 18 years old; n = 37) ratio in the study was 0.97. In the child group, the mean age was 13.2 years, and, in the adults, the mean age was 30.2 years. Racial ethnicity was self-reported, as African American (n = 27), Asian (n = 6), Caucasian (n = 17), and Hispanic (n = 23). The Angle classification of subjects was Class I (n = 48), Class II, including both divisions 1 and 2 (n = 18), and Class III (n = 7), which was consistent with the typical ratios seen in a university-based orthodontic clinic. No statistically significant differences were noted considering age, gender, race, or malocclusion.

Association between VitDBP and tooth alignment

In the entire study population, baseline VitDBP was not statistically significantly related to tooth alignment's absolute change. The significance was at p = 0.0748, which suggested a strong trend that VitDBP could be a predictive biomarker of tooth movement. Therefore, we decided to perform an exploratory post-hoc analysis. Since there are no reports on the "normal" levels of VitDBP in saliva, we ranked the subjects by their baseline VitDBP quartile levels. Subjects with VitDBP in the middle 50% were considered "normal," while the lower 25% and higher 25% were considered as "low" or "high," respectively.

Demographic information by normal vs. "low" and "high" VitDBP groups is shown in Table 1. We found that VitDBP in the log scale was between 2.75 and 6.48 ng/ml for the "normal" range group (middle two quartiles), ≤ 2.69 ng/ml for the low subgroup (first quartile), and between 6.59 and 8.42 ng/ml for the high subgroup (fourth quartile). Our analysis demonstrated that the normal range group (mean = 2.36 ± 0.28) had a significantly higher mean absolute difference in irregularity (p = 0.002) than the "low" or "high" groups (mean = 1.22 ± 0.31). Figure 1 shows the relationship between irregularity and VitDBP.

Table 1 Demographic Data of Subjects in Groups according to the LogVitDBP into "normal" range group (middle two quartiles), low subgroup (first quartile), and the high subgroup (fourth quartile)
Fig. 1
figure 1

The absolute difference in tooth irregularity relationship with VitDBP groups. We found that VitDBP in the log scale was between 2.75 and 6.48 ng/ml for the "normal" range group (middle two quartiles), ≤ 2.69 ng/ml for the low subgroup (first quartile), and between 6.59 and 8.42 ng/ml for the high subgroup (fourth quartile). Our analysis demonstrated that the normal range group (mean = 2.36 ± 0.28) had a significantly higher mean absolute difference in irregularity (p = 0.002) than the "low" or "high" groups (mean = 1.22 ± 0.31)

Seasonal differences in VitDBP levels

As VitD can be strongly impacted by seasonal changes due to the availability or lack of sunlight exposure, we then used a mixed regression model with a random intercept to assess the seasonal effects on VitDBP. The samples collected between April and September were considered to represent "summer," and those between October and March represent "winter." The average monthly temperature and average sunshine index were considered to distinguish between “summer” and “winter” of that year samples collected in the winter season (4.47 ± 0.30) had significantly higher VitDBP than those collected in the summer season (4.24 ± 0.30; p < 0.05). Overall, however, the VitDBP levels stayed in the normal range for both seasons.

Association between VitDBP and ALP

We also examined the patterns of change in VitDBP and ALP levels across the four treatment time points. Subjects were grouped into four groups according to whether their VitDBP or ALP levels changed from quartile to quartile over various time points into changed (fluctuating), increasing, decreasing and no change. Comparing subjects with any changing patterns in VitDBP (i.e., increasing, decreasing, or fluctuating) to those in the no change group, we observed that the "no change" VitDBP group showed overall smaller mean absolute differences in irregularity index than those in the changed groups as shown in Table 2. VitDBP was significantly related to the total ALP concentration (p = 0.039) and the absolute change in ALP (p = 0.0018). Neither ALP concentration nor ALP activity was significantly related to the change in tooth movement.

Table 2 LogVitDBP and ALP averages over time points for all subjects. Comparing subjects with any changing patterns in VitDBP (i.e., increasing, decreasing, or fluctuating) to those in the no change group, we observed that the "no change" VitDBP group showed overall smaller mean absolute differences in irregularity index than those in the changed group


In this study, we aimed to determine whether salivary levels of VitDBP were associated with the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. We also identified the impact of confounding factors such as the seasonal effects on VitDBP levels, measured the change in VitDBP and ALP levels in response to the first six months of orthodontic treatment (leveling and aligning phase), and determined the correlation between salivary VitDBP and ALP levels during orthodontic tooth movement. The results demonstrated that "normal" levels of VitDBP in saliva were associated with a greater tooth alignment rate and resolution of crowding during orthodontic tooth movement. On the other hand, "low" and "high" levels of VitDBP were associated with a reduced orthodontic tooth movement rate. These data suggested that optimal levels of VitD may be required for orthodontic therapy.

While the role of VitD in bone metabolism is well-established [3, 4, 13, 21], there is a lack of consensus on how to measure the VitD correctly and which form of the VitD is abundant and stable in biological fluids [6, 13, 14]. The majority of the literature is focused on 25-OHD as a more stable form with a longer half-life (10–15 days) compared to 1,25-OHD (4–6 h) and at a serum concentration 1000-fold level higher than 1,25OHD [2, 7, 8, 12, 22, 23]. However, less than 0.03% of 25-OHD is unbound, which brings up the difficulty of determining the accurate levels of 25-OHD from the measurements [7, 24]. VitDBP presents a novel and reliable measure to determine the free 25-OHD3 [25,26,27,28]. Being a more recent marker of VitD levels, there are no international standardized levels for VitDBP in human saliva or serum currently [29,30,31,32]. Serum levels are usually estimated between 300 and 600 mg/L in healthy subjects [15]. However, there are no studies of VitDBP levels in saliva to determine the "normal" levels of VitDB. In this study, we addressed this lack of knowledge. VitDBP levels in an orthodontic population of healthy individuals without any known systemic diseases were between 0 and 8.42 ng/ml. Our results demonstrated that VitDBP could be reproducibly measured in all samples from our patient cohort at every time point, which positions VitDBP as a potential biomarker in saliva associated with oral or systemic conditions. Since we did not collect any blood specimens, the correlation of salivary VitDBP to the serum or plasma levels is not known and needs to be studied.

VitD is considered as an "accelerator" and a stabilizing agent in the orthodontic tooth movement [1, 33, 34, 36]. Local injections of 1,25-OHD in cats showed a 60% increase in tooth movement [5]. Bone regeneration was also enhanced after local and systemic VitD supplementation in dogs [25]. Accelerated tooth movement and increased number of osteoclasts and osteoblasts were associated with VitD injection in rats [2, 10, 35]. In a clinical split-mouth study, there was a decreased amount of tooth movement in humans after injection with VitD3 [19]. In humans, VitD may not speed up tooth movement, but physiologic levels of VitD are needed to avoid counter effects [37, 38]. As pointed out above, however, methodological issues thus far limited the use of VitD as a marker to predict orthodontic treatment outcomes. In this study, baseline values of VitDBP showed a strong trend of correlation to tooth alignment's absolute change (p = 0.0748). While our study demonstrated a trend, the predictive value of salivary VitDBP for tooth movement was not statistically significant. Yet, given the string trend that is independent of the confounding factors (ex: age, gender or race) this issue should be studied further in larger cohorts in future studies.

As there were no normal levels of VitDBP available for saliva, we also ranked the subjects by their VitDBP levels. Measurements were grouped according to the average VitDBP levels of the subjects rather than the time-points measured. The subjects whose levels were within the middle 50% were considered “normal” and those above or below were considered as “high” or “low”. The subjects in the “normal’ range had more significant tooth movement than those in the other groups. Normal salivary VitDBP was between 2.75 and 6.48 ng/ml, which showed a tight interval. Normal VitDBP levels in saliva significantly correlated with a higher resolution of tooth irregularity than "high' or "low" groups. This finding is striking as it demonstrates that an optimal range of VitD is necessary for predictive orthodontic treatment. Therefore, for individuals with suboptimal (low or high) VitD levels at the start of the orthodontic therapy, a customized treatment strategy can be planned, and completion of the orthodontic treatment would be predictably longer.

Another important finding in our work was that VitDBP did not demonstrate significant variation between race, age, and gender, further supporting the value of salivary VitDBP as a measure of VitD. There has been controversy in whether VitD levels vary according to race, age, and gender. African Americans and Asians were thought to have higher VitD deficiency than Caucasians with stronger overall bone health [25, 39]. Most of these studies focused on detecting 1,25-OHD or 25-OHD, which could be a potential reason for the controversy. While the studies on VitDBP are scarce, one report in line with our findings presented no racial differences in average serum concentrations of VitDBP between whites and blacks [17] supporting the notion that VitDBP is a better marker of VitD metabolism than the 1,25-OHD and 25-OHD isoforms. Likewise, associations between VitD levels and aging and gender are controversial [15]. The age range of this study was kept deliberately wide to include as many patients as possible into the study. However, statistical tests were conducted to see if there were any differences in the age groups in the tested values with no significance in any measurement which is why they were ultimately combined. Postmenopausal women had lower VitDBP levels than premenopausal women [33, 40]; VitDBP was also negatively correlated with age in females than males [26]. Women were found to have higher mean VitDBP levels than men, but no other associations were noticed between VitDBP levels and body weight, BMI, fat mass, or fat percentage [17, 40]. Other studies have shown differences in VitD and VitDBP levels with age, gender, and race [17, 25, 33, 40]. While it was not the focus in our study, there was no impact of age, gender, and race detected on salivary VitDBP levels, which requires further investigation.

Previous studies have shown that there was a significant seasonal fluctuation in 25-OHD and 1,25-OHD levels [41]. During the winter, both free and calculated serum 25-OHD levels were higher than in the summer (0.020 ± 0.005% vs. 0.019 ± 0.004%; p = 0.007 with no significant differences in VitDBP levels [41]. Our study found a significant (p < 0.05) difference in salivary VitDBP levels when considering a two-season year model. During the "winter" season defined as October to February, salivary VitDBP levels were statistically higher than in the "summer" season defined as March to September, correlating with changes noted in 25-OHD and 1,25-OHD. Further studies are needed to determine the seasonal effects on VitDBP levels and its activity on 25-OHD and 1,25-OHD levels.

Previous research has focused on the ALP as a biomarker of osteoblastic activity that could reflect tissue responses during orthodontic tooth movement [42]. There is no consensus on the normal salivary ALP levels or ALP activity [43,44,45]. Limited studies focused on salivary ALP levels in regards to orthodontic tooth movement [43,44,45, 47]. We found the mean ALP concentration levels to be 9.33 ± 8.47 pg/ml and ALP activity 1.94 ± 1.76 uM/min/mg protein. ALP concentration and activity were not significantly correlated with the absolute change in irregularity over the six months in line with a similar study where ALP levels appeared to be stable and showed no differences between time points in orthodontic patients [46, 47]. There was, however, a correlation between the VitDBP levels and ALP levels in saliva, suggesting a direct role of VitDBP in bone metabolism.


Clinical outcomes of orthodontic treatment are associated with the level of VitDBP in saliva. Normal levels of VitDBP are shown to have higher orthodontic tooth movement levels than higher or lower levels. Given the strong trend that is independent of the confounding factors (ex. age, race or gender), the predictive value or salivary VitDBP for tooth movement should be studied in larger cohorts in future studies.

Availability of data and materials

All data and material will be available for review by contacting the corresponding author.



Vitamin D


Alkaline phosphatase


25-Hydroxyvitamin D


1,25-Hydroxyvitamin D


Vitamin D Binding Protein


  1. Bartzela T, Turp JC, Motschall E, Maltha JC. Medication effects on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;135(1):16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kawakami M, Takano-Yamamoto T. Local injection of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 enhanced bone formation for tooth stabilization after experimental tooth movement in rats. J Bone Miner Metab. 2004;22(6):541–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Asiry MA. Biological aspects of orthodontic tooth movement: a review of literature. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2018;25(6):1027–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson PH. Vitamin D activity and metabolism in bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2017;15(5):443–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Collins MK, Sinclair PM. The local use of vitamin D to increase the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;94(4):278–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dusso AS, Brown AJ, Slatopolsky E. Vitamin D. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005;289(1):F8-28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsuprykova O, Chen X, Hocher CF, Skoblo R, Yin L, Hocher B. Why should we measure free 25OH vitamin D? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;180:87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van den Ouweland JMW, Vogeser M, Bächer S. Vitamin D and metabolites measurement by tandem mass spectrometry. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2013;14(2):159–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holick MF, Chen TC. Vitamin D deficiency: a worldwide problem with health consequences. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(4):1080–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Meijen K, Lips P, van Driel M, Heijboer AC, Schulten EA, denHeijer M, et al. Primary human osteoblasts in response to 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and 24R,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haddad JG, Matsuoka LY, Hollis BW, Hu YZ, Wortsman J. Human plasma transport of vitamin D after its endogenous synthesis. J Clin Invest. 1993;91(6):2552–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Eleftheriadis T, Antoniadi G, Liakopoulos V, Stefanidis I, Galaktidou G. Inverse association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D with markers of inflammation and suppression of osteoclastic activity in hemodialysis patients. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2012;6(2):129–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Enko D, Fridrich L, Rezanka E, Stolba R, Ernst J, Wendler I, et al. 25-hydroxy-vitamin D status: limitations in comparison and clinical interpretation across different assay methods. Clin Lab. 2014;60(9):1541–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dudal S, Baltrukonis D, Crisino R, Goyal MJ, Joyce A, Osterlund K, et al. Assay formats: recommendation for best practices and harmonization from the Global Bioanalysis Consortium Harmonization Team. AAPS J. 2014;16(2):194–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Delanghe JR, Speeckaert R, Speeckaert MM. Behind the scenes of vitamin D binding protein: more than vitamin D binding. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;29(5):773–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bikle DD. Vitamin D metabolism, mechanism of action, and clinical applications. Chem Biol. 2014;21(3):319–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bouillon R, van Baelen H, de Moor P. The measurement of the vitamin D binding protein in human serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1977;45(2):225–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang H, Williams RC, Kyrkanides S. Accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: molecular mechanisms. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;146(5):620–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shetty A, Patil AK, Ameet R, Sandhu PK. Local infiltration of vitamin D3 does not accelerate orthodontic tooth movement in humans. Angle Orthod. 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Little RM. The irregularity index: quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod. 1975;68(5):554–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. St-Arnaud R. The direct role of vitamin D on bone homeostasis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;473(2):225–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Haq A, Svobodova J, Imran S, Stanford C, Razzaque MS. Vitamin D deficiency: a single centre analysis of patients from 136 countries. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;164:209–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Su Z, Narla SN, Zhu Y. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D: analysis and clinical application. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;433:200–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hollis BW. Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels indicative of vitamin D sufficiency: implications for establishing a new effective dietary intake recommendation for vitamin D. J Nutr. 2005;135(2):317–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hong K, Florkowski CM, Doogue MP, Elder PA, Lewis JG. A monoclonal antibody sandwich ELISA for vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP) is unaffected by Gc-globulin phenotype peptides and actin and demonstrates reduced levels in sepsis and non-sepsis intensive care patients. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;484:7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yousefzadeh P, Shapses SA, Wang X. Vitamin D Binding Protein impact on 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels under different physiologic and pathologic conditions. Int J Endocrinol. 2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Jassil NK, Sharma A, Bikle D, Wang X. Vitamin D binding protein and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels: emerging clinical applications. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(5):605–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. El-Khoury JM, Reineks EZ, Wang S. Progress of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in the measurement of vitamin D metabolites and analogues. Clin Biochem. 2011;44(1):66–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Higashi T, Shibayama Y, Fuji M, Shimada K. Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometric method for the determination of salivary 25-hydroxyvitamin D3: a non-invasive tool for the assessment of vitamin D status. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;391(1):229–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Higashi T, Shimada K, Toyo’oka T. Advances in determination of vitamin D related compounds in biological samples using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry: a review. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2010;878(20):1654–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu Y, Shu R, Luo L-J, Ge L-H, Xie Y-F. Initial comparison of proteomic profiles of whole unstimulated saliva obtained from generalized aggressive periodontitis patients and healthy control subjects. J Periodontal Res. 2009;44(5):636–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang X, Meng H, Xu L, Zhang L, Shi D, Feng X, et al. Vitamin D-binding Protein levels in plasma and gingival crevicular fluid of patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis. Int J Endocrinol. 2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nimeri G, Kau CH, Abou-Kheir NS, Corona R. Acceleration of tooth movement during orthodontic treatment—a frontier in orthodontics. Prog Orthod. 2013;14:42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Diravidamani K, Sivalingam SK, Agarwal V. Drugs influencing orthodontic tooth movement: an overall review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012;4(Suppl 2):S299-303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kale S, Kocadereli I, Atilla P, Asan E. Comparison of the effects of 1,25 dihydroxycholecalciferol and prostaglandin E2 on orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;125(5):607–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. van Driel M. Pols HA and van Leeuwen JP Osteoblast differentiation and control by vitamin D and vitamin D metabolites. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10(21):2535–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Suda T, Ueo Y, Fujii K, Shinki T. Vitamin D and bone. J Cell Biol. 2003;88(2):259–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Meikle MC. The tissue, cellular, and molecular regulation of orthodontic tooth movement: 100 years after Carl Sandstedt. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28(3):221–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cashman K, Dowling KG, Skrabakova Z, Kiely M, Lamberg Allardt C, Durazo-Arvisu RA, et al. Standardizing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D data from four Nordic population samples using the Vitamin D Standardization Program protocols: shedding new light on vitamin D status in Nordic individuals. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015;75(7):549–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pop LC, Shapses SA, Chang B, Sun W, Wang X. Vitamin D-binding Protein in healthy pre- and postmenopausal women: relationship with Estradiol concentrations. Endocr Pract. 2015;21(8):936–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Oleröd G, Hulten LM, Hammarsten O, Klingberg E. The variation in free 25-hydroxy vitamin D and vitamin D-binding protein with season and vitamin D status. Endocr Connect. 2017;6(2):111–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Farahani M, Safavi SM, Dianat O, Tusi SM, Younessian F. Acid and alkaline phosphatase levels in GCF during orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2015;16(3 Suppl):237–45.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Patel R, Varma S, Suragimath G, Zope S. Estimation and comparison of salivary calcium, phosphorous, alkaline phosphatase and pH levels in periodontal health and disease: a cross-sectional biochemical study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(7):ZC58–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Khumukcham S, Suresh S, Sudhakar U, Jayakumar P, Mathew D. Comparative analysis of salivary alkaline phosphatase in post-menopausal women with and without periodontitis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(1):ZC122–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jazaeri M, Malekzadeh H, Abdolsamadi H, Rezaei-Soufi L, Samami M. Relationship between salivary alkaline phosphatase enzyme activity and the concentration of salivary calcium and phosphate ions. Cell J. 2015;17(1):159–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Perinetti G, Baccetti T, Contardo L, Di Lenarda R. Gingival crevicular fluid alkaline phosphatase activity as a non-invasive biomarker of skeletal maturation. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Flórez-Moreno GA, Marin-Restrepo LM, Isaza-Guzman DM, Tobon-Arroyave SI. Screening for salivary levels of deoxypyridinoline and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase during orthodontic tooth movement: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35(3):361–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to express our thanks and appreciation to all the residents at Boston University and the staff at the Forsyth institute for all their support during the course of the study.


No funding was provided.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



NT: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing-original draft. YZ: formal analysis. GML: investigation, resources. DS: investigation, resources. MP: investigation. MM: supervision. LAW: supervision, funding acquisition. AK: conceptualization, methodology, resources, writing-review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alpdogan Kantarci.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study and all experimental protocols were approved by the Boston University Ethical Review Board H‐34695: The Effects of Vitamin D Levels on Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Date of initial IRB approval: September 21, 2016. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all included subjects and parents/guardians of all subjects under age 16.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None of the authors had any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tashkandi, N., Zhao, Y., Mitchell-Lee, G. et al. Longitudinal assessment of salivary vitamin D binding protein during orthodontic tooth movement. BMC Oral Health 21, 332 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: