Skip to main content

Oral neglect as a marker of broader neglect: a cross-sectional investigation of orodental consultation letter of leukemic admitted patients in Iran

Abstract

Background

Leukemia is the main malignant hematologic disease of children with different oral manifestations and clinical features. Attention to the oral manifestations is essential for better management. This study assessed the oral and dental consultations conducted in the admitted leukemic patients of an Iranian teaching hospital.

Methods

In this descriptive cross-sectional study, medical records of patients admitted in Yazd Shahid Sadoughi Hospital were evaluated. Records of 300 patients with leukemia were randomly selected. Data including demographic information on age, sex, type of oral problems, prescribed instructions and leukemia type were extracted from archived records and registered on the checklist. Finally, Data were analyzed by SPSS17 using Chi-square test.

Results

The results showed the average age ± SD of patients were 24.36 ± 23.91 with a range of 4 days to 86 years. Among 300 files, 167 belonged to males (55.7%) and 133 pertained to females (44.3%). The most prevalent type of underlying disease was ALL (Acute lymphocytic leukemia) with the frequency of 180 persons (60%). Only 12 (4%) of patients were referred to a specialist due to oral problems. Of all cases of consultation requests, 75% received consultation because of dental problems and 25% for mucosal problems. There was a statistically significant difference between age and consultation request (P = 0.002).

Conclusions

According to the results of this study, orodental consultation request rate for admitted leukemic patients was low. Pediatric hematologist and oncologists to some extent had more interest to consult due to oral and dental problems rather than others.

Peer Review reports

Background

Oral health, as a mirror of body health, could be influenced by different problems and impacts the quality of life. Leukemia is the most common type of cancer among children in the Middle East [1] and the sixth common type of cancer in Iran [2]. It happens when there is a deficiency in proliferation or evolution of white blood cells (WBCs) [1]. Accumulation of these cancerous cells outside the bone marrow, leads to the formation of masses either in oral mucosa or vital body organs [3, 4]. Acute leukemia is the most common type of malignancy among children. Leukemia has varying manifestations in different organs and oral cavity. These oral problems are observed in the majority of patients and may be the first sign that could lead to diagnosis [5, 6].

Oral involvement in acute leukemia is reported in 91% of patients and 85% of patients who are on chemotherapy and in 100% of cases who are treated by radiotherapy [7,8,9,10]. Gingival hyperplasia, mucosal wounds and bleeding [5,6,7], and lymphadenopathy are some signs of orofacial problems [7].

The aim of multidisciplinary consultation is to have two physicians with different specialties to cooperate in order to achieve the best solution to the problem and better management of patients in appropriate time. The request for medical consultation reflects the diagnosis and communication skills and also professionalism of a physician [11]. Good communication is necessary to a high-quality consultation process. A large number of health staff have not passed any courses on consultation; besides, most of them faced with a situation of consultation request [12]. Failure in the consultation may lead to late diagnosis, inappropriate prescription and unnecessary polypharmacy, unnecessary laboratory tests, and medical expenses [13].

Alibhai et al. [14] concluded that among cancer patients who referred to specialized centers, the rate of referral was higher significantly in those under 19 years; also, there was a clear negative correlation between age of the patients and medical consultation requests. In other words, the rate of medical consultation was higher in children.

Moreover, a study by Villa et al. [15] in America demonstrated that leukemic patients affected by oral problems were visited by different physicians before referring to an oral medicine specialist. This is due to the low level of information about this specialty among physicians and ordinary people.

Considering the review of studies, it seems that a little amount of information is available about medical consultation in patients with hematologic cancer due to oral complications [16, 17]; timely diagnosis of oral complications caused by leukemia has a vital role in prognosis and patients’ quality of life. This study evaluated the prevalence of oral and dental consultations conducted in the admitted leukemic patients in the Oncology Department of Yazd Shahid Sadoughi Hospital during February and March, 2017.

Methods

This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out on 300 leukemic patients’ archived files with a history of admission in Yazd Shahid Sadoughi Hospital during February and March, 2017, were randomly selected according to the random number table. This study was approved by the Committee of Ethics in Human Research at Yazd Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences (ID#: IR.SSU.REC.1396.191). Simple census sampling method was used to select the subjects. Considering P = %10 obtained in the pilot study and a confidence level of 95% (α = 0.05) and accuracy of 4% (d = 0.04), the sample size was determined as 217. According to statisticians’ opinion and approval of local ethical committee, to obtain more reliable and stronger statistical results, the sample size was increased to 300. With all legal dimensions, as a routine treatment program of the academic hospital, an informed consent consisting the permission of using medical records and oral examination separately was obtained from admitted adult patients or their parents and/or legal guardian of the patients younger than 18 years old, at the time of admission.

Data composed of demographic information on age, sex, type of oral problems, prescribed instructions and leukemia type, and were extracted from archived records and registered on the checklist.

Data were analyzed by SPSS17 using Chi-square test (P < 0.05). All methods were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the declaration of Helsinki.

Results

Among 300 files, there were 167 males (55.7%) and 133 females (44.3%). The average age ± SD of patients was 24.36 ± 23.91 ranging between 4 days and 86 years (Table 1).

Table 1 Relative frequency distribution of study patients according to demographic variables

The average age ± SD of 16 medical specialists who were consulted was 47.91 ± 3.88 with a range of 34 to 65 years. Among them, there were 14 males and 2 females. The profile of doctors who prescribed dental consultations is displayed in Table 2. Among 16 medical specialists, only 3 medical specialists (2 pediatric hematologist and oncologists and 1 adult hematologist and Oncologist) had consulted with dentists (Table 2).

Table 2 Profile and number of consultation request of doctors participating in the present study

As it is shown in Table 3, ALL (Acute lymphocytic leukemia) was the most common type of leukemia with the frequency of 60% of patients.

Table 3 Frequency distribution of consultation request rate according to underlying disease type and age of patients

The result of this analysis showed that only 12 (4%) patients were referred to a specialist due to oral problems. Of all cases of consultation requests, 75% consulted because of dental problems and 25% for mucosal problems.

The frequency distribution of consultation requests according to the patient's sex demonstrated that among 12 patients who requested for consultation, 5 patients (41.6%) were male and 7 patients (58.4%) were female. Chi-Square test indicated that there was not any statistically significant difference based on sex.

Based on type of hematologic cancer, the highest number of consultation requests were related to ALL with 83.3%. Furthermore, there was not any consultation request in patients affected by CLL (Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia) and CML (Chronic Myeloid Leukemia) (Table 3).

There is no statically significant difference according to type of hematologic cancer (P value = 0.065).

The distribution of consultation request as a function of the patient's age are listed in Table 3.

As it is shown in Table 3, there was a significant statistical difference between age and consultation request (P = 0.002) and the highest number was requested in children up to 9.

Oral problems were evaluated in 6 groups, 108 patients (36%) had at least one oral problem, while in 64% of cases there were no data related to oral problems, unfortunately (Table 4).

Table 4 Relative frequency of oral signs and symptoms and prescription for oral problems based on patients’ files

The prescribed instructions were classified in 4 groups and no medicine was prescribed for 176 of cases (58.6%); besides, for 124 of cases (41.4%), at least one category of medicine in the list was prescribed (Table 4).

Discussion

The average age ± SD of patients was 24.36 ± 23.91 with a range 4 days to 86 years. Among 300 patients, there were 167 males and 133 females. Also, among 16 medical specialists, there were 14 males and 2 females. The most prevalent type of underlying disease was ALL.

Oral complications related to the chemotherapy were seen in more than 75% of cases [18]. On the other hand, in many cases, oral complications in early stages leads to the diagnosis of leukemia [5, 6]; thus, dentists have a vital role in 33% of AML diagnosis [19].

In this study, the frequency of oral complications of studied cases was only 36% which is similar to the frequency of the study carried out by Nakhostin et al. [17] (39.7%); however, in clinical studies, the frequency of oral complications was determined higher than this study [5, 6, 20]. Nakhostin et al. [17] believed that the reason of low prevalence of oral complications in their study was the issue of not registering them in patients’ files. Our results are consistent with the study above. In the present study, the patients' hospital files were evaluated for oral complications. They were documented by medical specialists or medical interns, not oral medicine specialists. The differences between this study and previous ones could be attributed to ignoring some oral manifestations by medical physicians. Higher percent of prescribed instructions (41.4%) compared to registered oral complications (36.6%) confirms this. It is suggested that the data related to orodental complications should be recorded in hospitals by oral medicine specialists to omit data collection bias.

In the present study, at least one drug was prescribed to overcome oral complications in 41.4% of patients. Besides, 83.3% of patients who were referred to a dentist received prescription; nonetheless, in the study by Navarro et al. [21], only 14.8% of patients referred to an oral medicine specialist received prescription. This demonstrates that in this investigation physicians prefer to treat oral and dental complications without consultation with a dentist; by the way, in this study, unlike other studies which recommend single drug regimen for mucosal problems [19, 22, 23], the most common treatment was the combined mouthwash (a mixture of Diphene hydramine, Nystatin, Aluminum-Mg syrup and Normal Saline). It should be mentioned that the composition of this mouthwash was different from other mouthwashes [7, 24]. These differences in the treatment plan of oral complications in cancer patients are consistent with the results of a study by Glenny et al. [25]. According to their study, despite the existence of specific guidelines in this field, clinicians of 6 medical centers in the United Kingdom manage oral complications in different ways. These differences may be due to patient cooperation or physicians’ preference, following oral routine care, staff awareness, and time limitations. However, in that study, the most common prescription used for oral problems was multi drug therapy.

The most frequent oral complication caused by leukemia in this study was, to some extent, the same as another Iranian study by Ghasemzadeh et al. [26]. In their study, the most common oral complication was bleeding, but in this study, bleeding ranked second after mucosal wounds. Also, the least frequent problem in both studies was dental problems.

In the present study, frequency of oral complications and referral of patients were 36% and 4%, respectively. Dela Cruz et al. [27] reported that 78% of primary care clinicians were inclined to refer their patients to a dentist if they faced symptoms of primary caries or high risk patient. Nevertheless, in this study, medical specialists’ performance was assessed. The oral consultation requests were 11%. The big difference between two studies indicates that Iranian medical specialists are unaware of the importance of consultation with oral medicine specialists.

Another reason pertained was the lack of residents of dentistry or oral medicine specialists in hospitals for consultation while Lockhart et al. [13] mentioned the presence of 4 full time dentists as one of important factors in referral to dentists. On the other hand, according to studies by Hashemipour et al. [28] and Tomlinson et al. [29], the long distance between dental centers and the studied hospitals is another reason for the lack of consultation request for oral problems.

According to Dela Cruz et al. [27], most pediatric primary care providers had some difficulties in referring their patients to dentists. They believed increasing access to dental services is necessary to reduce the problem, and suggested some solutions such as increasing the number of dental graduates and recruiting more dentists in the public care system.

Indeed, in the study by Collard et al. [30], various health care professionals were unable to provide dental services; in the study by Lewis et al. [31], 46% of pediatricians took part in oral health-related activities and less than 25% of pediatricians had received oral health education during university course or continuing education.

It is better to consult with an oral medicine specialist for all of admitted patients who are at risk of any oral complications [16, 27]. Some reasons for not doing dental consultation promptly, could be time limitations, lack of proper knowledge of the appropriate time for dental intervention and lack of resources [25]. It is noteworthy that all the consultation requests were carried out by hematologist and oncologists; of course, 91.6% were undertaken by pediatric hematologist and oncologists. This finding confirmed the results of a study by Glenny et al. [25]. They mentioned a big difference in the provision of dental services to children and adults with cancer.

Consultation request due to oral problems has been ignored in other fields of medicine throughout the world. This may be the result of lack of awareness and attitude towards oral medicine among medical specialists. The level of awareness of medical specialists and other healthcare staff toward the referral and consultation due to oral problems with dentists was low in previous studies [15, 28, 32,33,34,35,36,37]. Meanwhile, medical and dental students demonstrated a positive attitude towards awareness of the collaboration between medical and dental practice in Hong Kong [38]. The necessity of education in this field is unanimous. However, some studies have shown that the level of knowledge of medical specialist about different fields of dentistry had no effect on the amount of consultation and referrals to them [27].

In the present study, only 25% of dental consultations were related to mucosal problems and the remaining 75% were associated with dental problems, while in the study by Lockhart et al. [13], nearly 72% of referrals to dentists were due to mucosal problems and 28% for dental problems. These significant differences between two studies may be attributed to low knowledge of medical physicians toward oral medicine or interest in managing oral problems by themselves. Unfortunately, researches have shown that in other studies, less attention has been paid to the health of the oral mucosa and only dental problems such as caries or dental malformations were considered a good reason for dental consultation. Nevertheless, neglecting the oral health and oral complications in leukemic patients could be life-threatening [16, 27, 31, 39].

In the present study, the rate of consultation requests varied significantly depending on age of patients. Indeed, 91.6% of referrals pertained to children up to 9 years old. It may be due to the greater number of children affected by acute leukemia which causes more oral manifestations. Higher mitotic rate and thinner mucosal epithelium in children, make them vulnerable to mucosal defects and oral problems. On the other hand, children's frequent restlessness and inability to eat, make physicians look for solutions to the problem [40]. Alibhai et al. [14] showed a significant negative correlation between patient's age and referral request rate in patients affected by AML. In this study, similar to the study by Dela Cruz et al. [27], other patient characteristics did not show any clear relationship with referral rate.

To overcome the problems and obstacles of consultation with dentists, the presence of a number of oral medicine residents in hospitals, a proper educational curriculum, spreading information to increase the knowledge of patients and healthcare staff are recommended.

Clinicians should bear in mind that the role of oral health in the quality of life of cancer patients is vital. It would be interesting to open a line of research on this topic in future.

To our knowledge, this is the first report showing ignoring consultation request due to the existing oral and dental problems of admitted leukemic patients in Iran. It would be the basis of need assessment in health promotion planning and reducing morbidity and mortality of cancer.

Limitations

One of the limitations of this study was sampling from only a single medical center. Of course, considering this was the only teaching hospital for leukemic patients’ admission in Yazd, this limitation could be ignored. Another limitation of the study was incomplete patients' files. To overcome this problem, all incomplete files would be randomly replaced with other files.

The novelty of this study includes evaluating the performance of different medical specialists in dental consultation at the teaching hospital in Yazd, center of Iran. Unfortunately, this subject has been currently ignored in developing countries.

Conclusion

Our findings showed that orodental consultation request rate for admitted leukemic patients was low; pediatric hematologist and oncologists to some extent had more interest to consult due to oral and dental problems rather than others. Regarding the high prevalence of oral problems in leukemic patients, timely consultation with oral medicine specialists could play a vital role in quality of life and survival of involved patients.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its raw analysis: Additional file 1).

Abbreviations

ALL:

Acute lymphocytic leukemia

AML:

Acute myeloid leukemia

CLL:

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

CML:

Chronic myeloid leukemia

References

  1. 1.

    Al-Mulla NA, Chandra P, Khattab M, Madanat F, Vossough P, Torfa E, et al. Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the Middle East and neighboring countries: A prospective multi-institutional international collaborative study (CALLME1) by the Middle East Childhood Cancer Alliance (MECCA). Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61(8):1403–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bakhshi-Biniaz R, Mortazavi Y, Taherkhani R, Dehghan N, Mostafaei L, Sefidi F, et al. The Experts’ Views on Challenges and Needs for Diagnosis and Treatment Process of Blood Cancer in Iran. J Zanjan Univ Med Sci. 2014;22(91):61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ashok L, Sujatha G, Hema G. Estimation of salivary amylase and total proteins in leukemia patients and its correlation with clinical feature and radiographic finding. Indian J Dent Res. 2010;21(4):486–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Vural F, Ozcan MA, Ozsan GH, Demirkan F, Piskin O, Ates H, et al. Gingival involvement in a patient with CD56+ chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2004;45(2):415–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Huber MA, Sankar V. Hematologic diseases. In Burket's oral medicine. 12th edition. Edited by Glick M. Shelton: PMPH-USA; 20215:453-462.

  6. 6.

    Little JW, Falace D, Rhodus NL. Dental Management of the Medically Compromised Patient. 9th ed. St.Louis: Elsevier; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dean JA. McDonald and Avery Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 10th ed. St.Louis: Elsevier; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Emidio TC, Maeda YC, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Puppin-Rontani RM. Oral manifestations of leukemia and antineoplastic treatment-a literature review (part II). Braz J Health. 2010;1(2):136–49.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Owlia F, Tabatabaei SH, Motallaei MN, Ayatollahi F, Ayatollahi R. Prevalence of Oral Mucosal Lesions in Patients with Hematological Disorders or Cancer: A Cross-sectional Study. Middle East J Cancer. 2020;11(2):192–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ponce-Torres E, Ruíz-Rodríguez MDS, Alejo-González F, Hernández-Sierra JF, Pozos-Guillén A. Oral manifestations in pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010;34(3):275–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kloeppel EM, Hanaya H, Seilacher E, Schroth S, Liebl P, Keinki C, et al. Utility of a Referral Letter to Improve Comprehensibility of Cancer Patients in Palliative Care: a Single-Center Study. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33(2):487–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Khajavian S. Evaluation of the quality of internal consulting services of Imam Khomeini Hospital based on Goldman principles in the first half of. thesis. Tehran: Tehran university of medical science; 2012. p. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lockhart PB, Sonis ST. Utilization of inpatient dental consultation services. Spec Care Dent. 1981;1(1):18–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Alibhai SMH, Leach M, Minden MD, Brandwein J. Outcomes and quality of care in acute myeloid leukemia over 40 years. Cancer. 2009;115(13):2903–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Villa A, Stock S, Aboalela A, Lerman MA, Woo SB, Sonis ST, et al. Oral medicine referrals at a hospital-based practice in the United States. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;119(4):423–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Erin HD. Preventive dental care: an educational program to integrate oral care into pediatric oncology. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2017;21(5):611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Nakhostin A, Meighani G. Leukemia and its oral manifestations in children younger than 12 years referred to Tehran pediatric hospitals. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2016;8(4):6.

  18. 18.

    Owlia F, Kazemeini SK, Gholami N. Prevention and management of mucositis in patients with cancer: a review article. Iran J Cancer Prev. 2012;5(4):216–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Francisconi CF, Caldas RJ, Oliveira Martins LJ, Fischer Rubira CM, da Silva Santos PS. Leukemic oral manifestations and their management. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(3):911–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Juárez-López MLA, Solano-Silva MN, Fragoso-Ríos R, Murrieta-Pruneda F. Oral diseases in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia with chemotherapy treatment. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2018;56(2):132–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Navarro CM, Onofre MA, Sposto MR. Referral letters in oral medicine: an approach for the general dental practitioner. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30(5):448–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hallett KB. Oral care of the paediatric oncology patient. Clinical recommendations. Melbourne: Royal Children’s Hospital; 2010.

  23. 23.

    Lerman MA, Laudenbach J, Marty FM, Baden LR, Treister NS. Management of oral infections in cancer patients. Dent Clin N Am. 2008;52(1):129–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Padmini C, Bai KY. Oral and dental considerations in pediatric leukemic patient. ISRN Hematol. 2014;2014:895721.

  25. 25.

    Glenny A, Gibson F, Auld E, Coulson S, Clarkson J, Craig J, et al. A survey of current practice with regard to oral care for children being treated for cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(8):1217–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ghasemzade S. Oral manifestations of lukemiain patients referred to Ghazi-Tabatabaei Hospital, Tabriz, Iran, 2017. DDS Thesis: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences; 2018.

  27. 27.

    dela Cruz GG, Rozier RG, Slade G. Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers. Pediatrics. 2004;114(5):e642–52.

  28. 28.

    Hashempour M, Mansouri M. Investigation of cases and referral patterns of patients to dental specialists by general dentists in 2011 in Kerman. Iran J Isfahan Dent Sch. 2012;8(5):433–43.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tomlinson P, McAndrew R. A survey of general dental practitioners’ opinions of response letters received from hospital specialists following a referred patient’s first appointment. Br Dent J. 2006;200(11):621–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Collard M, Hunter M. Oral and dental care in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a survey of United Kingdom children’s cancer study group centres. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2001;11(5):347–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lewis CW, Boulter S, Keels MA, Krol DM, Mouradian WE, O’Connor KG, et al. Oral health and pediatricians: results of a national survey. Acad Pediatr. 2009;9(6):457–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Delavarian Z, Zavvar S. an evaluation on patterns, and causes of referring patients to oral diseases and diagnosis department of Mashhad Dental Faculty from September to December 2000. J Islam Dent Assoc. 2004;16(2):62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Haberland CM, Allen CM, Beck FM. Referral patterns, lesion prevalence, and patient care parameters in a clinical oral pathology practice. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;87(5):583–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jovanovic A, Schulten EAJM, van der Waal I. Referral pattern of patients with oral mucosal lesions in The Netherlands. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1992;20(2):94–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mahalingam S, Pepper C, Oakeshott P. Reducing inappropriate ENT referrals. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(613):404–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Navabi N, Chamani G, Zarei MR, Jalali P. Referral patterns and medical malpractice in patients with oral mucosal lesions before attending in oral medicine clinic of Kerman Dental Faculty. J Med Counc Islam Repub Iran. 2009;27(3):317–23.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sardella A, Demarosi F, Lodi G, Canegallo L, Rimondini L, Carrassi A. Accuracy of referrals to a specialist oral medicine unit by general medical and dental practitioners and the educational implications. J Dent Educ. 2007;71(4):487–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zhang S, Lo EC, Chu C-H. Attitude and awareness of medical and dental students towards collaboration between medical and dental practice in Hong Kong. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15(1):53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ismail AI, Nainar SH, Sohn W. Children’s first dental visit: attitudes and practices of US pediatricians and family physicians. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(5):425–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Subramaniam P, Girish Babu K, Nagarathna J. Oral manifestations in acute lymphoblastic leukemic children under chemotherapy. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008;32(4):319–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been supported financially by the Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology of Yazd Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. Grant No. 5677. The authors thank Miss. Roqaieh Hakimian for her cooperation.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology of Yazd Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences (5677). The grant supported data collection process. The funders had no role in the design of the study and collection, and analysis, interpretation of data or preparation of the manuscript. The report of the study's findings is sent by the authors to funder at the end of the study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FO developed the initial concept of study. FO and AA contributed to the study design and wrote the manuscript. AA collected the data and FO supervised the data collection. FO contributed to the methodology and analysis and interpretation of data. AA and HV contributed to data analysis. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Ansarinia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all patients. If subjects were under 18, the informed consent was obtained from the parent and/or legal guardian to access to their document. This research project (ref no: IR.SSU.REC.1396.191) was approved by the Ethics Committee of Yazd Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors mention that there is no conflict of interest in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Raw data.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Owlia, F., Ansarinia, A. & Vahedian Ardakani, H. Oral neglect as a marker of broader neglect: a cross-sectional investigation of orodental consultation letter of leukemic admitted patients in Iran. BMC Oral Health 21, 413 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01775-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01775-x

Keywords

  • Leukemia
  • Referral
  • Consultation
  • Oral manifestations