Skip to main content

A predictive nomogram: a cross-sectional study on a simple-to-use model for screening 12-year-old children for severe caries in middle schools

Abstract

Background

A nomogram is a tool that transforms complex regression equations into simple and visual graphs and enables clinicians and patients to conveniently compute output probabilities without needing medical knowledge and complex formulas. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive nomogram to screen for severe caries among 12-year-old children based on risk factors in Sichuan Province, China.

Methods

A cross-sectional study of 4573 12-year-olds was conducted up to May 2016 in middle schools from three districts and three counties in Sichuan Province, China. All the children underwent oral examinations and completed questionnaires to assess general information, oral impacts on daily performance, dietary habits, subjective health conditions, history of dental trauma, frequency of toothache, dental visits, and knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours toward oral hygiene. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine which variables were significantly associated with severe caries (operationalized as DMFT ≥ 3). A nomogram was developed and validated by using the ‘rms’ package and two cross-validation methods.

Results

Severe caries was found in 537 of the 4573 children (11.74%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the following variables predicted a higher risk of severe caries: ‘female’ [odds ratio (OR) = 1.985, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.63–2.411], ‘urban’ (OR = 2.389, 95% CI: 1.96–2.91), ‘non-only child’ (OR = 1.317, 95% CI: 1.07–1.625), ‘very poor self-assessment of oral health status’ (OR = 2.157, 95% CI: 1.34–3.467) and ‘visited a dentist less than 6 months’ (OR = 1.861, 95% CI: 1.38–2.505). Multivariate logistic regression analysis also indicated that the following variables predicted a lower risk of severe caries: ‘middle level of urbanization’ (OR = 0.395, 95% CI: 0.32–0.495) and ‘high level of urbanization’ (OR = 0.466, 95% CI: 0.37–0.596). Both the fivefold and leave-one-out cross-validation methods indicated that the nomogram model built by these 6 variables displayed good disease recognition ability.

Conclusions

The nomogram was a simple-to-use model to screen children for severe caries. This model was found to facilitate non-dental professionals in assessing risk values without oral examinations and making referrals to dental professionals.

Peer Review reports

Background

Dental caries is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases; it occurs among susceptible children who are at risk for developing decay and progresses throughout their life spans [1, 2]. Dental caries also diminishes oral health-related quality of life [3]. The global oral health goal was that by the year 2000, the mean decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) index among 12-year-old children would be no more than 3, which was accepted for caries prevention by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Dental Federation (FDI) in 1981 [4, 5]. Although China has maintained a mean DMFT of ≤ 1.00 since 1983 owing to the use of fluoride and the achievement of oral health education [6], the distribution of caries remains skewed. It has been reported that most cases of caries are found in only a small number of children [7, 8]. Thus, we can obtain the Significant Caries (SiC) Index of a certain area by examining one-third of the local children who have the highest number of DMFT. According to the global goal of caries levels that was proposed in 2000, the SiC index should have been less than 3 DMFT among 12-year-old children by 2015 [9]. Screening out children with severe caries and taking targeted preventive measures will help save socioeconomic resources, improve caries-related outcomes and contribute to better oral health.

Data from the World Health Survey showed that oral healthcare coverage was 46.5% in China [10]. Located in southwestern China, Sichuan Province had a population of 83.41 million in 2018, but there were only 9,225 dental practitioners and assistants [11]. Moreover, Chinese parents rarely take their children to regular oral examinations. Therefore, a simple-to-use predictive model is required to help non-dental professionals (e.g., medical staff at community facilities or school doctors) assess risk values without oral examinations and make referrals to dental professionals.

Nomograms are widely used as reliable risk prediction tools [12,13,14] and can generate a numeral probability by integrating risk variables. This model is simple and rapid for application because it does not require complex mathematical formulas or medical knowledge. Although there have been studies on nomograms in the dental field [15], to the best of our knowledge, few studies have formulated nomograms suitable for screening for severe caries.

This article aimed to investigate risk factors for severe caries in children and to develop and validate a simple-to-use nomogram to screen for severe caries among 12-year-old children based on the risk level calculated in Sichuan Province, China.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of children aged 12 years was conducted in Sichuan Province between December 2015 and May 2016. Ethics approval of the Oral Health Survey was obtained from the Stomatological Ethics Committee of the Chinese Stomatological Association and the Ethics Committee of the West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University (Approval No. 2014-003). Consent for participation and publication was also obtained from the parents or legal guardians of the children in this study.

Sampling

A multistage stratified random-cluster survey sampling design was used for participant selection [16]. In the first stage, based on the 2010 census conducted by the National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China, three districts and three counties in Sichuan Province (Guang’an, Chuanshan, and Jinniu Districts, Yibin, Da, and Pi Counties) were randomly selected to represent low/middle/high levels of urbanization by probability-proportional-to-size (PPS) [17]. Next, a simple random sampling method was used to select middle schools. Consisting of 3 private schools and 28 public schools, a total number of 31 randomly-selected schools got involved in the study. Finally, all 12-year-old children from the selected schools in each area were invited to participate in the study. The ages were calculated according to the survey month. The sample size was calculated based on the following formula:

$$n = deff\frac{{\mu^{2} (1 - p)}}{{\varepsilon^{2} p(1 - nonresponse)}},$$

where n is the sample size, the design effect deff is 2.5, p is 28.9% according to the dental caries prevalence in the Third National Oral Health Survey, μ (1.96) is the level of confidence, ε (7.5%) is the margin of error, and the nonresponse rate is 5% [18]. The formula above indicated that a sample size of 4420 12-year-old children was required.

Quality control

To ensure inter-examiner reliability, 4 trained and licensed dentists, including three training examiners and one calibrating examiner, were required to receive the pre-survey calibration training. The results of caries examination for schoolchildren were recorded by assistants. To ensure intra-examiner reliability of oral examination, 5% of samples were selected for duplicate examination, then compared with the original data and with the calibrating examiner every day during the survey. Cohen’s kappa statistics assessing the consistency of inter- and intra-examiner were all exceeded 0.80 [19].

Caries examination

After parents signed informed consent forms, all 4800 schoolchildren who participated in questionnaire surveys were examined on mobile dental chairs with portable lights at the schools. A tooth was classified as decayed when there was a lesion in a pit or fissure; on a smooth tooth surface with an unmistakable cavity; on undermined enamel; or on a detectably softened floor or wall. The DMFT of permanent teeth examinations mainly relied on ocular inspection with the help of Community Periodontal Index (CPI) probes as recommended by the WHO for clinical examinations [20]. This DMFT index covers the teeth and/or tooth number that were decayed, filled or extracted as a result of caries, which we used to assess dental caries.

Questionnaire

Thirty-nine closed questions (see Additional file 1) were designed by experts based on the variables suggested by the WHO [20]. Paper printed questionnaires were completed by children individually in the classroom under the explanations of one licenced dentist. If a child did not fill the questionnaires completely or did not qualify, they were excluded from the analyses.

Independent variables

Thirty-nine independent variables came from questionnaire containing children’s socio-demographic information, including age, gender, districts/counties (Guang’an, Chuanshan, and Jinniu Districts, Yibin, Da, and Pi Counties) represent different level of urbanization, region (urban/rural), father/mother’s education level (illiterate/low/medium/high), only child (yes/no) and oral impacts on daily performances (serious/general/slight/none/does not know; impact on eating, talking, brushing, working, schooling, sleeping, grinning, communicating, and if easily troubled). Additionally, questions assessing dietary habits, subjective health conditions, history of dental trauma, frequency of toothache in the previous 12 months, dental visits, and knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours toward oral hygiene were also included.

Outcome variable selection

The global goal for dental caries prevention among 12-year-olds was an SiC Index less than 3 DMFT [9]. Therefore, the outcome variable in this study was set as a binary variable based on whether a child had severe caries (DMFT ≥ 3).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) for Windows. Univariate analyses (chi-squared tests) were first conducted to locate factors that might be associated with the outcome variable. Second, a multivariate logistic regression model was built to evaluate the association of the outcome variables with the selected variables mentioned above using a backward selection method (entry significance level = 0.05, stay significance level = 0.10) [21, 22]. The partial regression coefficient (β), Wald’s χ2, P-value (Wald test), odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated to specify the predictive model. Third, a nomogram was constructed based on the results of a multivariate logistic regression model by using the ‘rms’ package in R version 2.14.1 (http://www.r-project.org/). Finally, the prediction performance of the model was assessed by using both fivefold and leave-one-out cross-validation (CV) methods. The fivefold CV method was conducted according to the following steps: (i) data were randomly divided into five parts; (ii) one-fifth of the data was set aside as a validation dataset, and a logistic regression model was fitted using the remaining four-fifths (the training dataset); (iii) the resulting training model was used to calculate the predicted probability of each validation observation; (iv) steps (i) to (iii) were repeated four more times; and (v) average indicators were calculated. Indicators, including sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate (FPR), false-negative rate (FNR), negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), Youden Index (YI), accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC), were calculated for training, validation, and all data to assess the predictive ability of the model. For a similar reason, the leave-one-out CV method was used to fit the model for all cases except one and then tested on the set-aside case. This process was repeated for each observation in the original sample (random sampling without replacement). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and a calibration curve were also generated to assess the predictive ability of the model. All statistical tests (except stay significance level of multivariate logistic regression model) were two-tailed with the significance levels set to 0.05.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

A total of 4800 children participated in the survey. Among them, 227 children were excluded due to failure to complete questionnaires. Ultimately, 4573 children were included in this study, and the response rate was 94.27%. DMFT index and its components were presented in Table 1. Among the 4573 12-year-olds, 2248 (49.16%) had experience with caries (DMFT ≥ 1), including 1048 boys and 1200 girls. Only 537 (11.74%) children had severe caries (DMFT ≥ 3), which revealed a significantly skewed distribution.

Table 1 Dental caries status of 12-year-old children in Sichuan province, 2015–2016

Univariate analysis

Univariate analyses (chi-squared tests) were conducted first, and 16 factors were found to be statistically significantly associated with DMFT ≥ 3 (P < 0.05; Table 2): socio-demographic information (‘gender’, ‘region’, ‘only child’, ‘urbanization’), cariogenic diet (‘candy/chocolate/cookies/cakes’), self-assessment (‘self-assessment of oral health status’), trauma (‘history of dental trauma’), toothache (‘frequency of toothache in the previous 12 months’), dental visit (‘history of dental visits’, ‘reason for last dental visit’, ‘time of last dental visit’), oral hygiene knowledge and attitude (‘fluoride can protect teeth’, ‘pit and fissure sealing can protect teeth’, ‘regular dental check is necessary’), and oral impacts on daily performances (‘impact on sleeping’, ‘impact on grinning’).

Table 2 Description of the potential risk indicators selected by univariate analysis

Multivariate logistic regression

A multivariate logistic regression model was built with the selected variables. For the predictive model, the following variables were included: ‘female’, ‘urban’, ‘low level of urbanization’, ‘only child’, ‘poor or very poor oral health for self-assessment’, and ‘visited a dentist less than 6 months or more than 12 months ago’ (P < 0.1; Table 3).

Table 3 Selected variables associated with the risk of DMFT ≥ 3 in the final regression model

Nomogram formulation

A simple-to-use nomogram was formulated based on six risk factors for the children with severe caries by multivariate logistic regression (Fig. 1). The longer the variable scales were, the more relative importance they had. ‘Risk’ indicated the possibility of a child with severe caries (DMFT ≥ 3), and the cut-off point was 0.1332 based on the ROC curve.

Fig. 1
figure1

The nomogram constructed for identifying severe caries was based on multivariate logistic regression. This model is quite simple to use. For example, if a child is in an urban population, a vertical line is drawn where the region of the nomogram is “urban”, and the corresponding points are approximately 60 points. Similarly, suppose this child satisfies the conditions of “Female”, “Middle level of urbanization”, “Non-only child”, “Very poor oral health for self-assessment” and “never visits dentist”, and the scores are “48, 0, 20, 100, 0” respectively. In this case, the total points are 228, and the corresponding risk value is between 0.2 and 0.3

Model validation

We assessed the discrimination performance of the model using fivefold CV and leave-one-out CV methods, providing five ROC curves with both validation data and training data (Fig. 2). The mean areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were 0.6848 (95% CI: 0.6157, 0.7539) for the training data and 0.7053 (95% CI: 0.6898, 0.7208) for the validation data with fivefold CV. The AUCs were 0.7023 (95% CI: 0.67682, 0.72778) (Table 4) for all data and 0.6951 for leave-one-out CV (Fig. 2). Additionally, a calibration curve was made to assess the predictive performance of the nomogram (Fig. 3). Sensitivity, specificity, YI, accuracy, FPR, FNR, NPV and PPV were also calculated (Table 4).

Fig. 2
figure2

Nomogram ROC curves with fivefold CV and leave-one-out CV. Five ROC curves (ae) with validation data (red solid line) and training data (blue dashed line) and one ROC curve (f) with leave-one-out CV (red solid line) and all data (blue dashed line)

Table 4 Validation and evaluation indicators of the screening model in training and validation data
Fig. 3
figure3

The calibration curve of the nomogram model. For the calibration curve, the X-axis is the predicted probability, and the Y-axis is the actual probability. The diagonal (ideal curve/dashed line) meant the prediction probability was completely consistent with the actual rate, and our curve (apparent curve/solid line) was close to the diagonal, which suggested that this model shows good predictive performance

Discussion

The global prevalence and severity of caries are different between developing and developed countries [23, 24], but the first challenge we face is the same: screening out people with severe caries and taking targeted preventive measures [25]. Many caries risk assessment (CRA) tools have been built in previous research on risk factor management, including high-cost examinations such as salivary flow and composition, cariogenic bacteria, and genetic factors [26]. Although these methods improve the accuracy of the predictive model, they require more waiting time, qualified dentists, laboratory technicians, and funds. There is a shortage of dental professionals in China, and the number of children suffering from tooth decay is large. For this reason, these methods are not applicable for caries screening in large-scale populations.

In our study, a simple-to-use predictive model was conducted based on dental examinations and questionnaires from a cross-sectional survey in Sichuan Province. The cumulative points of every independent variable in the nomogram could be calculated and matched to the scale of risk possibility. We recommend a two-stage stratified screening for severe caries among 12-year-old children in Sichuan Province: (i) The proposed nomogram is used in the first stage to reduce manpower and financial resources. Non-dental professionals administer questionnaires involving six risk factors and calculate the risk value of severe caries according to the model. If a risk value is higher than 0.1332 (cut-off point), it is recommended to visit a dentist as early as possible and enter the second stage; if the value is below the cut-off point, regular oral examinations (two times per year) are recommended. (ii) In the second stage, CRA tools or other oral examinations are conducted by dental specialists to further assess the severity of caries.

Risk factors in our study were mainly associated with socio-demographic information and dental experiences. In accordance with previous studies [27, 28], “female children” have a higher risk factor for caries of permanent teeth. Their caries prevalence is associated with earlier tooth eruption [29], low salivary flow rate, sugar consumption [30] and dental phobia [31, 32], which may require improvements in dental education, medical environmental design, and doctor-patient communication.

Caries experience was the primary risk factor [33, 34]. The relationship between caries experience and dental visit information was corroborated by previous research [35, 36]. It seems contradictory that children who visit the dentist more often have a higher likelihood of caries. A possible reason for this is that many parents take their children to the dentist only for treatment instead of prevention. A cariogenic oral environment formed by caries without treatment would exacerbate cavities, as has been previously reported [37]. Under these circumstances, it is recommended that parents regularly take their children to the hospital for dental examinations. Additionally, more oral health education, collaboration between parents and schools, and more local medical facilities are oral health strategies in Sichuan Province.

The subjective impression of oral health seems to have good predictive power [38]. A previous study showed significant differences in the “self-assessment of teeth” [28] among 12-year-old students. In the present study, “very poor oral health for self-assessment” was the most strongly weighted variable that contributed to the risk of severe caries. Region, urbanization, and only child were the other three independent predictors of severe caries, which is consistent with previous research [39,40,41].

An interesting finding was that lifestyle and behavioural factors such as a sugary diet, frequency of tooth brushing, and fluoride toothpaste and dental floss use, which were widely mentioned in dental epidemiological research [42,43,44], were not included. This difference may be explained differences between the outcome variable in our study (i.e., whether a child had severe caries (DMFT ≥ 3)) and the outcome variables used in previous research [45].

For model validation, we used two CV methods. In general, AUCs lower than 0.6 are considered to have poor discrimination, while AUCs higher than 0.7 suggest high discriminating ability. Both the fivefold and leave-one-out CV methods indicate a good discriminating ability of our nomogram for severe caries.

The strengths of this research are related to its large cross-sectional study design, in which the representative districts and counties of Sichuan Province were selected by a multistage sampling design. In addition, the results of the screening model are displayed with a simple and intuitive graphical form, which facilitates the children and their parents understanding and attracts their attention. However, if the sample size is expanded, the model based on national data will be more practical. Additionally, this model developed herein should be further validated via a longitudinal study.

Conclusion

Gender, region, urbanization, only child, self-assessment of oral status, and time of last dental visit were shown to be highly correlated with caries risk. The nomogram is a simple-to-use way to identify children who have severe caries (DMFT ≥ 3) and was found to facilitate non-dental professionals in predicting risk values without oral examinations and making referrals to dental professionals.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset of the study is available from the corresponding author at reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DMFT:

Decayed, missing or filled permanent teeth

WHO:

World Health Organization

FDI:

International dental federation

PPS:

Probability proportional to size

CPI:

Community Periodontal Index

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence intervals

CV:

Cross-validation

FPR:

False-positive rate

FNR:

False-negative rate

NPV:

Negative predictive value

PPV:

Positive predictive value

YI:

Youden Index

AUC:

Area under curve

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

CRA:

Caries risk assessment

References

  1. 1.

    Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015;94(5):650–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Peres MA, Macpherson LMD, Weyant RJ, Daly B, Venturelli R, Mathur MR, Listl S, Celeste RK, Guarnizo-Herreño CC, Kearns C, et al. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. Lancet. 2019;394(10194):249–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Krisdapong S, Prasertsom P, Rattanarangsima K, Sheiham A. Relationships between oral diseases and impacts on Thai schoolchildren’s quality of life: evidence from a Thai national oral health survey of 12- and 15-year-olds. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012;40(6):550–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Barmes DE. Indicators for oral health and their implications for developing countries. Int Dent J. 1983;33(1):60–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hobdell M, Petersen PE, Clarkson J, Johnson N. Global goals for oral health 2020. Int Dent J. 2003;53(5):285–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Oral Health Country/Area Profile Project. https://capp.mau.se/country-areas/china/. Accessd 20 June 2021

  7. 7.

    Wei SH, Holm AK, Tong LS, Yuen SW. Dental caries prevalence and related factors in 5-year-old children in Hong Kong. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15(2):116–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lo E, Chu C, Lin H. Caries control programme for children in China: one year results. J Dent Res. 2001;80(4):1377–1377.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bratthall D. Introducing the Significant Caries Index together with a proposal for a new global oral health goal for 12-year-olds. Int Dent J. 2000;50(6):378–84.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hosseinpoor AR, Itani L, Petersen PE. Socio-economic inequality in oral healthcare coverage: results from the World Health Survey. J Dent Res. 2012;91(3):275–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Commission NHAF: The Chinese Health Statistics Yearbook Peking Union Medical College Press; 2019.

  12. 12.

    Lei Z, Li J, Wu D, Xia Y, Wang Q, Si A, Wang K, Wan X, Lau WY, Wu M, et al. Nomogram for preoperative estimation of microvascular invasion risk in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(4):356–63.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Xue M, Su Y, Feng Z, Wang S, Zhang M, Wang K, Yao H. A nomogram model for screening the risk of diabetes in a large-scale Chinese population: an observational study from 345,718 participants. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):11600.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mo R, Shi R, Hu Y, Hu F. Nomogram-based prediction of the risk of diabetic retinopathy: a retrospective study. J Diabetes Res. 2020;2020:7261047.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Schwahn C, Meisel P, Biffar R, König J, John U, Kocher T. Dental nomograms for benchmarking based on the study of health in Pomerania data set. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31(12):1099–105.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lu HX, Tao DY, Lo ECM, Li R, Wang X, Tai BJ, Hu Y, Lin HC, Wang B, Si Y, et al. The 4th national oral health survey in the mainland of China: background and methodology. Chin J Dent Res. 2018;21(3):161–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lohr SL. Sampling: design and analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yin W, Yang Y-M, Chen H, Li X, Wang Z, Cheng L, Yin Q-D, Fang H-Z, Fei W, Mi F-L, et al. Oral health status in Sichuan Province: findings from the oral health survey of Sichuan, 2015–2016. Int J Oral Sci. 2017;9(1):10–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wu SC, Ma XX, Zhang ZY, Lo ECM, Wang X, Wang B, Tai BJ, Hu DY, Lin HC, Wang CX, et al. Ethnic disparities in dental caries among adolescents in China. J Dent Res. 2021;100(5):496–506.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Organization WHO: Oral health surveys: basic methods: World Health Organization. In: 5th edn; 2013.

  21. 21.

    Dawood S, Broglio K, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH. Prognosis of women with metastatic breast cancer by HER2 status and trastuzumab treatment: an institutional-based review. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(1):92–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Li J, Chen B, Gao C, Huang J, Wang Y, Zhang S, Xu Y, Guo W, Wang R. Clinical and pathological features of idiopathic membranous nephropathy with focal segmental sclerosis. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):467–467.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Marthaler TM. Changes in dental caries 1953–2003. Caries Res. 2004;38(3):173–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Burt BA. Prevention policies in the light of the changed distribution of dental caries. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998;56(3):179–86.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gaudilliere D, Thakur Y, Ku M, Kaur A, Shrestha P, Girod SC. Caries management by risk assessment in a cleft and craniofacial center. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(6):e529-536.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Young DA, Featherstone JD. Caries management by risk assessment. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41(1):e53-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Chu CH, Wang JH, Jan RH, Huang CH, Cheng CF. Association between health examination items and body mass index among school children in Hualien, Taiwan. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:975.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chen C, Zhang F, Wang R. Dental caries experience and related risk indicators of 12-year-old students in Jilin, China. Med Baltim. 2020;99(28):20988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Martinez-Mier EA, Zandona AF. The impact of gender on caries prevalence and risk assessment. Dent Clin North Am. 2013;57(2):301–15.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kunitomo M, Ekuni D, Mizutani S, Tomofuji T, Irie K, Azuma T, Yamane M, Kataoka K, Taniguchi-Tabata A, Mizuno H, et al. Association between knowledge about comprehensive food education and increase in dental caries in Japanese University Students: a prospective cohort study. Nutrients. 2016;8(3):114.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Oosterink FM, de Jongh A, Hoogstraten J. Prevalence of dental fear and phobia relative to other fear and phobia subtypes. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117(2):135–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wabnegger A, Scharmüller W, Schienle A. Sex-specific associations between grey matter volume and phobic symptoms in dental phobia. Neurosci Lett. 2014;580:83–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zhang Q, van Palenstein Helderman WH. Caries experience variables as indicators in caries risk assessment in 6-7-year-old Chinese children. J Dent. 2006;34(9):676–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Birkeland JM, Broach L, Jorkjend L. Caries experience as predictor for caries incidence. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1976;4(2):66–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Christian B, Ummer-Christian R, Blinkhorn A, Hegde V, Nandakumar K, Marino R, Chattopadhyay A. An epidemiological study of dental caries and associated factors among children residing in orphanages in Kerala, India: Health in Orphanages Project (HOPe). Int Dent J. 2019;69(2):113–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhou N, Wong HM, McGrath C. Oral health and associated factors among preschool children with special healthcare needs. Oral Dis. 2019;25(4):1221–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Mak KK, Day JR. Dental health behaviours among early adolescents in Hong Kong. Int J Dent Hyg. 2011;9(2):122–6.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zandona AF, Longbottom C. Detection and assessment of dental caries: a clinical guide. Basingstoke: Springer Nature; 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    David J, Wang NJ, Astrøm AN, Kuriakose S. Dental caries and associated factors in 12-year-old schoolchildren in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15(6):420–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tsai AI, Chen CY, Li LA, Hsiang CL, Hsu KH. Risk indicators for early childhood caries in Taiwan. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006;34(6):437–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Odom JG, Mourino AP, Gordon MA, Odom SS. The only child: candidate for increased dental care. Pediatr Dent. 1983;5(1):72–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Marinho VC, Jeroncic A. Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3(3):Cd007868.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Giacaman RA. Sugars and beyond: the role of sugars and the other nutrients and their potential impact on caries. Oral Dis. 2018;24(7):1185–97.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Touger-Decker R, Van Loveren C. Sugars and dental caries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78(4):881S-892S.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kyaw Myint ZC, Zaitsu T, Oshiro A, Ueno M, Soe KK, Kawaguchi Y. Risk indicators of dental caries and gingivitis among 10–11-year-old students in Yangon, Myanmar. Int Dent J. 2020;70(3):167–75.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A special thanks to Song J.Q., Hong X., Wang L.Y. and Chen H. for advice.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant for the Key Research and Development Program of China of Sichuan Province (Grant No. 20ZDYF3012) and the 2015 Chinese Institute of Stomatology Public Welfare Industry Research Project (Grant No. 201502002). The funders had no role in the design of the study and the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TH conceived and designed the experiments; JZ, HY and JH performed the experiments; RC and ML analysed the data; SD and ML wrote the paper. LL gave suggestions about modification. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ran Cheng or Tao Hu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (locally approved by the ethics committee of the Stomatological Ethics Committee of the Chinese Stomatological Association and the Ethics Committee of the West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University: 2014-003). After parents signed informed consent forms, examinations were conducted with mobile dental chairs and portable lights.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Overview of the questionnaire

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, S., Li, M., Zhao, J. et al. A predictive nomogram: a cross-sectional study on a simple-to-use model for screening 12-year-old children for severe caries in middle schools. BMC Oral Health 21, 457 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01819-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • Caries risk
  • Oral health
  • Regression analysis
  • Models
  • Statistical
  • Cross-sectional studies