Skip to main content
Download PDF

Associations between psychological wellbeing, depression, general anxiety, perceived social support, tooth brushing frequency and oral ulcers among adults resident in Nigeria during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic

BMC Oral Health volume 21, Article number: 520 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

The aims of this study were to determine the associations between psychological wellbeing, and the frequency of tooth brushing and presence of oral ulcers during the COVID-19 pandemic; and to identify the mediating roles of psychological distress (general anxiety and depression) and perceived social support in the paths of observed associations.

Methods

This cross-sectional study recruited 996 adults in Nigeria between June and August 2020. Data collected through an online survey included outcome variables (decreased frequency of tooth brushing and presence of oral ulcers), explanatory variable (psychological wellbeing), mediators (general anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms and perceived social support) and confounders (age, sex at birth, educational and employment status). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the risk indicators for the outcome variables. A path analysis was conducted to identify the indirect effect of mediators on the association between the outcome and explanatory variables.

Results

Of the 966 respondents, 96 (9.9%) reported decreased tooth-brushing frequency and 129 (13.4%) had oral ulcers during the pandemic. The odds of decreased tooth-brushing during the pandemic decreased as the psychological wellbeing increased (AOR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.83–0.91; p < 0.001) and as generalized anxiety symptoms increased (AOR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86–0.98; p = 0.009). The odds of having an oral ulcer was higher as the generalized anxiety symptoms increased (AOR: 1.15; 95% CI: 01.08–1.21; p < 0.001). Only generalized anxiety (indirect effect: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.01–0.04; P = 0.014) significantly mediated the relationship between wellbeing and tooth-brushing accounting for approximately 12% of the total effect of wellbeing on decreased toothbrushing. Generalized anxiety (indirect effect 0.05; 95% CI: − 0.07–0.03; P < 0.001) also significantly mediated the relationship between wellbeing and presence of oral ulcer accounting for 70% of the total effect of wellbeing on presence of oral ulcer. Depressive symptoms and perceived social support did not significantly mediate the associations between psychological wellbeing, decreased frequency of tooth brushing and the presence of oral ulcers.

Conclusion

Patients who come into the dental clinic with poor oral hygiene or oral ulcers during the COVID-19 pandemic may benefit from screening for generalized anxiety and psychological wellbeing to identify those who will benefit from interventions for mental health challenges.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The first official case of the COVID-19 disease in Nigeria was identified on the 27th of February 2020. At the time of commencement of this study on the 21st of June 2020, the number of COVID-19 cases was 20,244 and the number of deaths was 518. At the time of concluding the data collection on the 6th of August 2020, the number of COVID-19 cases was 45,244 and the number of deaths was 930 [1]. On March 23, 2020, land borders were closed, all international flights were halted, and mandatory institutional quarantine and testing for international returnees to Nigeria were instituted following the confirmation of the initial 30 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Nigeria [2]. On March 30, 2020, a series of stringent interventions were institutedfor high COVID-19 burden States.These included stay-at-home orders and cessation of non-essential movements and activities at schools and workplaces, bans on religious and social gatherings, cancellation of public events and curfews [2]. These lockdown strategies were eventually extended to the entire country [2, 3].These drastic lockdown measures came with significant economic and social costs for many Nigerians [2, 4]. The pandemic also affected the mental health and wellbeing of people [5] as well as limited the access of many to social support [6].

Wellbeing refers to an individuals’ feeling about their life satisfaction [7]. It incorporates concepts of happiness or social welfare [8]; and is influenced by factors such as access to social support and psychological states [9] such as anxiety and depression which negatively impact self-perceived wellbeing [10]. Nigerians experienced psychological distress such as insomnia, depressive, post-traumatic stress and anxiety symptoms, and suicidal ideation due to the COVID-19 pandemic [11,12,13]. Many households had their income reduced and access to healthcare services was limited due to the instituted lockdown measures [14]. These psychological and socioeconomic adversities negatively affected the wellbeing of many Nigerians [4].

Psychologicaladversitiessuch as generalized anxiety and depression also had negatively impacts on oral health quality of life [15]. Generalized anxiety and depression are associated with oral ulcers [16] and affect the quality of tooth-brushing [17]. Depression has been shown to have indirect adverse effects on the periodontal health by causing neglect of tooth-brushing due to an unwillingness to take part in physical activities [18, 19]. Depression is also associated with high consumption of refined carbohydrates, use of psychoactive substances, smoking of tobacco, alcoholism and poor dental service utilisation which can increase the likelihood of ulcer-forming oral health conditions [20]. Generally, anxiety is associated with a greater risk for oral ulcers than depression [21].

Poor oral hygiene resulting from poor tooth-brushing will affect the psychological wellbeing of individuals. Poor oral hygiene also affects the general health and is associated with a wide range of medical conditions such as aspiration pneumonia, cardiovascular diseases, stroke, type 2 diabetes, adverse pregnancy outcome [22,23,24]. Oral ulcers also result in poorer psychological well-being [25]. Poor oral health is associated with poorer lifestyle [26] including social withdrawal, isolation, and low self-esteem thereby setting up a vicious cycle of oral and mental health deterioration [27, 28].

The aims of the study were, therefore, to determine the association between self-reported psychological wellbeing, the frequency of tooth-brushing and the presence of oral ulcers during the COVID-19 pandemic; and to identify if psychological distress (generalized anxiety and depression) and perceived social support partly mediated the observed associations between psychological wellbeing; andthe frequency of tooth-brushing and the presence of oral ulcers. For this study, we recognize the multiple inter-relationships between factors association with oral hygiene and mental health; and that the frequency of tooth-brushing is just one of these factors [29]. We also recognise that beliefs, values, preferences, and thought processes may not always directly connect an intervention like the frequency of tooth-brushing to an outcome like poor oral hygiene [30]. However, considering that few studies have investigated oral health in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigerian and most developing countries, we used frequency of toothbrushing and oral ulcers as proxies for oral health in the present study [31].

For this study we assessed how the context created by COVID-19 pandemic may have affected an oral health behaviour (tooth-brushing) and its outcomes either directly or indirectly through mental health pathways. We hypothesize that there will be associations between psychological wellbeing, psychological distress (general anxiety and depression), perceived social support, and oral health practice (frequency of tooth-brushing) and oral diseases (oral ulcers) among adults in Nigeria during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Ethical consideration

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the Institute of Public Health, Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife, Osun State Nigeria. The approval number is IPH/OAU/12/1560. Study participants were informed about the study objectives, the inclusion and exclusion criteria, their right to withdraw from study participation and the anonymized nature of the data collection. Participants could only continue with filling the questionnaire if they consented to participating in the study by checking the consent box.

Study design and study population

The study was a cross-sectional study that recruited adults aged 18 years and older who were resident in Nigeria at the time of their completion of the online survey which was presented as a Google form. The survey was launched from the 21st of June 2020 till the 6th of August 2020. Individuals who were unable to use the internet, or who did not speak English or who had severe cognitive or physical impairments that made it difficult to understand the questions in the survey were excluded from the survey.

Sample size

Initially, 1045 persons participated in the online survey of whom only 966 (92.4%) had sufficient data for inclusion in analyses. We considered this sample size sufficient as it was larger than similar online surveys that had been carried out in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic which ranged from 500 [32] to 800 [33] and were sufficiently powered to detect significant associations with indicators of wellbeing.

Study participants’ recruitment

Study participants were recruited through adverts promoted on social media platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. These participants were further asked to disseminate the links to those in their own networks using snowball sampling. Web-based modalities for data collection has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic though not without its limitations [34]. Restrictions were applied to the settings so that each participant could only take the survey once. Participants were able to edit their answers freely until they chose to submit. Identifying data were not collected to ensure that responses were anonymous.

Data collection

Outcome variables

Oral health: The oral health status of respondents was determined using two questions: did the frequency of tooth-brushing change during the lockdown with the options of ‘Yes (increased)’, ‘Yes (decreased)’ and ‘No’; and did you have oral ulcers during the lockdown with the options Yes or No.

Explanatory variables

Psychological wellbeing assessment: The World Health Organization-Five (WHO-5) Well-Being Index [35] was used to measure the subjective well-being status of participants. This is a short instrument that consists of five questions scored on a 6-point Likert scale with scores ranging from 0 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). The five questions were: (1) ‘I have felt cheerful and in good spirits', (2) ‘I have felt calm and relaxed', (3) ‘I have felt active and vigorous', (4) ‘I woke up feeling fresh and rested' and (5) ‘My daily life has been filled with things that interest me'. The respondents were asked to rate how well each of the statements applied to them within the last 14 days. Possible scores ranged from 0 to 25. The total sum was converted to a percentage by multiplying with four to obtain an aggregate wellbeing index ranging between 0 and 100. Higher scores indicated better wellbeing. The index had been validated with good psychometric properties [36]. The Cronbach's alpha for WHO-5 for this study population was 0.95.

Generalized anxiety and depressive symptoms assessment: Depressive and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale which comprises of 14 questions: seven questions assess anxiety symptoms and the other seven assessed depressive symptoms respectively [37]. Each question was rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no, not at all) to 3 (yes, definitely). Total scores were derived for anxiety symptoms and depressive symptoms with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The scale has been validated for use in Nigeria [38]. For this study, the Cronbach’s alpha for the anxiety and the depression subscales were 0.81 and 0.64 respectively.

Perceived Social Support: Perceived social support was measured using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support [39]. It consists of 12 questions each rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very strongly disagree) to 7 (very strongly agree). The total scores, derived by summing the scores on each item, ranged from 12 to 84 with higher scores indicating higher perceived social support. The scale had been validated in Nigeria [40]. For this study, the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.97.

Confounders

Information was collected on the age of respondents at last birthday in years, sex at birth, level of highest educational achievement (none, primary, secondary and tertiary) and employment status at the time of data collection (employed, not employed). The study outcome and explanatory variables were assessed with reference to the COVID-19 pandemic period: respondents were asked to self-report on their oral and mental health during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic period.

Statistical analyses

Analyses were carried out using the IBM-SPSS software version 26. The variables were described using frequencies and percentages. Tests of association were carried out using Chi-squared tests or student t-tests as appropriate, to determine the associations between the outcome variables (change in frequency of tooth brushing and presence of oral ulcers), the explanatory variables (depression, anxiety, perceive social support and perceived wellbeing) and the confounders (age, sex, educational status and employment status).

Multivariable regression models were used for inferential analysis. Binary logistic regression models were used to tests the associations between each of the explanatory variables and each of the outcome variables while adjusting for confounders. Only variables that showed no collinearity were included in the study model. The estimated coefficients were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and their 95% confidence intervals were reported.

Mediation path analyses were conducted with each model consisting of explanatory, mediation, and outcome variables. We used maximum likelihood estimation and estimated means and intercepts. Bootstrapping was used to generate 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals and standard errors using 10,000 bootstraps. Standardized estimates (β) were calculated for direct and indirect effects of anxiety, depression, perceived social support and perceived wellbeing on frequency of tooth-brushing and reports of oral ulcers. The model was considered to have a good fit if the chi square test was not statistically significant: the root mean square error of approximation was < 0.05, the comparative fit index was > 0.09 and the Tucker- Lewis index was > 0.09. Significance was set at the 5% level. Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS version 22.0 and mediation analyses including the direct, indirect and total effects were estimated with PROCESS procedure for SPSS version 3.5.3 [41].

Results

Table 1 highlights the factors associated with the frequency of tooth-brushing and oral ulcers during the pandemic. Of the 966 respondents, 96 (9.9%) reported a decrease in tooth-brushing frequency and 129 (13.4%) had oral ulcers during the pandemic. More respondents who had low psychological wellbeing (p < 0.001), who were younger (p = 0.015) and who had more severe depressive symptoms decreased their frequency of their tooth brushing during the pandemic (p = 0.032). Also, more male than female respondents (p = 0.005), older respondents (p = 0.021), those with tertiary education (p < 0.001), those with worse psychological wellbeing (p = 0.001), more severe general anxiety symptoms (p < 0.001), more severe depressive symptoms (p < 0.001) and lower perceived social support (p = 0.035) had oral ulcers during the pandemic.

Table 1 Profile of tooth brushing frequency of tooth brushing and oral ulcers among adults resident in Nigeria during the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 966)
Full size table

Table 2 highlights the risk indicators for decrease in tooth-brushing frequency and the presence of oral ulcers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The two factors significantly associated with a decrease in tooth-brushing were psychological wellbeing, and general anxiety symptoms. The odds of decreased frequency of tooth-brushing during the pandemic decreased as the psychological wellbeing increased (AOR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.83–0.91; p < 0.001) and as the severity of general anxiety symptoms increased (AOR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86–0.98; p = 0.009).

Table 2 Multivariate regression of factors associated with decreased frequency of tooth brushing and presence of oral ulcers among adults resident in Nigeria during the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 966)
Full size table

Factors significantly associated with having oral ulcers during the pandemic were general anxiety symptoms, sex at birth, age and educational status. The odds of having an oral ulcer was higher as the general anxiety symptoms increased in severity (AOR: 1.15; 95% CI: 01.08–1.21; p < 0.001); as the age increased (AOR: 1.031; 95% CI: 1.01–1.05; p = 0.003); and for those with secondary (AOR: 3.88; 95% CI: 1.47–10.14; p = 0.006) and tertiary (AOR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.28–4.17; p = 0.005) education when compared with respondents with no education. The odds of having oral ulcer was lower for men when compared to women (AOR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.37–0.86; p = 0.008).

As shown in Fig. 1, depressive symptoms (β: − 0.01; 95% CI: 0.03–0.01) and perceived social support (β: 0.01; 95% CI: 0.001–0.02) had no significant mediator effect on the relationship between wellbeing and decreased toothbrushing. We noted that anxiety symptoms, after being introduced as a mediator significantly (indirect effect: β: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.01–0.04; P = 0.014) reduced the effect of wellbeing on the dependent variable (frequency of toothbrushing), accounting for approximately 12% of the total effect of wellbeing on decreased toothbrushing.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mediational analysis model showing the indirect effect of general anxiety, depressive symptoms on the association between wellbeing and decreased toothbrushing

Full size image

As shown in Fig. 2, we also found that depressive symptoms (β: − 0.002; 95% CI: − 0.02–0.02) and perceived social support (β: 0.002; 95% CI: − 0.006–0.010) did not significantly mediate the relationship between wellbeing and oral ulcer. Anxiety symptoms, after being introduced was the only significant mediator (indirect effect: β 0.05; 95% CI: − 0.07–0.03; P < 0.001) between wellbeing and oral ulcers, accounting for 70% of the total effect of wellbeing on presence of oral ulcers.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mediational analysis model showing the indirect effect of general anxiety, depressive symptoms on the association between wellbeing and oral ulcer

Full size image

Discussion

The study provides evidence that about 10% of respondents reported decreased frequency of tooth-brushing and about 13% of respondents had oral ulcers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. Worsening psychological wellbeing and increased severity of generalized anxiety symptoms were associated with decreased frequency of tooth-brushing while increased severity of generalized anxiety was associated with the presence of oral ulcers. Generalized anxiety also partly mediated the association between psychological wellbeing and decreased frequency of tooth brushing and presence of oral ulcers. The mediation effect of generalized anxiety was greater for the association between psychological wellbeing and oral ulcers than that for the association between psychological wellbeing and decreased frequency of tooth-brushing. Depressive symptoms and perceived social support were not associated with decreased frequency of tooth-brushing and presence of oral ulcers in adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria.

One of the strengths of the study is the empirical evidence provided on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the oral health of individuals. Prior studies had shown that SARS-CoV-2 infection is a risk factor for ageusia. There are case reports of COVID-19 being associated with necrotizing periodontal disease, oral ulcers, blisters, salivary gland alterations, white and erythematous plaques, and recurrent herpetic lesions [42,43,44]. The suggested pathways for these COVID-19 related oral lesions was mediation by SARS-CoV-2-associated tropism of endothelial cells and COVID-19-mediated endothelitis that promotes inflammation of oral tissues [45]. Our study suggests that oral ulcers may result from psychological health mediated pathways; specifically, poor wellbeing was associated with generalized anxiety symptoms which were in turn associated with decreased frequency of tooth-brushing and increased oral ulcers. Poor oral hygiene resulting from decreased tooth-brushing is a predisposing factor for necrotizing periodontal disease [46]. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with food insecurity, psychological stress, malnutrition, and poor sleeping habit [47, 48]; factors that increase the risk for oral ulcer-causing lesions like necrotising periodontal disease [49].

Our study, however, has several limitations. First, it was a cross-sectional study and so we cannot infer cause-effect relationships between the variables. For example, in addition to the pathways investigated in the present study, it is possible that oral health conditions also lead to decreased wellbeing. However, this possibility would be better investigated in longitudinal designs. Secondly, the data was collected using an online survey which may have excluded eligible participants who could not access the internet and this may limit the generalizability of the study findings. Thirdly, we did not explore changes in the diet which could also contribute to changes in oral health. Also, we did not rule out SARS-CoV-2 infection, tobacco use and other underlying medical problems that could be alternative causes of oral ulcers. Fourthly, there is also the risk for social desirability bias associated with self-reported questionnaires which may result in the under-reporting of mental health status and over-reporting of toothbrushing frequency. There is also the possibility of data contamination resulting from multiple individuals from the same household filling the questionnaire. Finally, the data on oral ulcer has an implicit assumption that the data collected was related to stress ulcers. There are other forms of ulcers that may have developed that are not related to stress thereby leading to a possible overestimation of the ulcers resulting directly or indirectly from the pandemic. Despite these limitations, we provide new evidence that suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic may be associated with changes in the oral health and oral health habits through direct and indirect associations with mental health.

Prior studies have indicated that better psychological wellbeing mediates better oral health quality of life [50]; and that mental health problems are directly and indirectly associated with poor oral health [15,16,17,18,19]. The findings of this study not only corroborate prior findings on the impact of mental health on oral health; but alsoindicate that these impacts are both direct and indirect during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The relationships between psychological wellbeing, generalized anxiety, frequency of tooth brushing, and oral ulcer appears complex. Prior studies indicate that generalized anxiety and depression were heightened during the pandemic globally [51] and in Nigeria [32]. The negative impacts of generalized anxiety and depression on psychological wellbeing has been previously reported [52, 53]; as have the negative impact of reduced psychological wellbeing, depression and generalized anxiety on oral health [15,16,17,18,19,20]; and the positive impact of access to social support on psychological wellbeing, depression, generalized anxiety and oral health [54]. These relationships may however be altered during a health crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that generalized anxiety (but not depression and perceived social support) wasassociated with the presence of oral ulcers and decreased frequency of tooth brushing. Generalized anxiety may cause an elevation in salivary cortisol and/or in immune regulatory activity in inflammation by increasing the quantity and activity of leukocytes thereby increasing the likelihood of oral ulcers. Generalized anxiety may also be associated with cheek or lip biting, or other actions causing injury to the oral mucosa [55].Although we found no literature indicating that pandemics may alter the pathway by which mental health problems may be associated with diseases, our findings indicate this possibility and the need for further investigation.

Poor psychological wellbeing had been associated with multiple health risk habits [56]. We did not come across any study indicating an association between psychological wellbeing and toothbrushing, however, our finding suggests that a decrease in the frequency of tooth-brushing may also reflect poor psychological wellbeing. Screening for poor psychological wellbeing in adults who present to a dental clinic with histories decreased frequency of tooth-brushing during stressful periods like the COVID-19 pandemic may help ensure prompt mental health support is provided when such needs are identified. It may also be important to manage the underlying mental health difficulties to improve oral health habits such as tooth-brushing and ensure prompt healing of oral ulcers. Normal tooth-brushing frequency also needs to be restored to reduce the risk for poor oral hygiene; a known risk factor for general health problems [57].

Consistent with a prior study which indicated that generalized anxiety had a stronger association with oral ulcers when compared with depression [27], our inability to identify a significant mediation effect for depressive symptoms and perceived social support in the relationship between psychological wellbeing and decreased frequency of tooth brushing may suggest that anxiety symptoms are more salient mental health correlates of oral health. This would be consistent with findings from separate analyses of the present dataset in which more COVID-19-related stressors were associated with generalized anxiety symptoms compared to depressive symptom [58].

Conclusion

Poor psychological wellbeing associated with the COVID-19 pandemic may be in turn associated withdecreased frequency of tooth-brushing. Generalized anxiety resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic may also be associated with decreased frequency of tooth-brushing and oral ulcers. Generalized anxiety partly explains the relationship between psychological wellbeing and decreased frequency of tooth brushing. However, we found no direct or indirect effects for depressive symptoms and perceived social support in the associations between psychosocial wellbeing, frequency of tooth-brushing and presence of oral ulcers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients who present at dental clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic may need to be screened for generalized anxiety and poor psychological wellbeing; and may need to be managed alongside mental health professionals.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated for this study are presented in the manuscript. The dataset for the online study data can however be accessible on reasonable request from one the study authors, Olakunle Oginni.

Abbreviations

β:

Coefficient

CI:

Confidence interval

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2

COVID-19:

Corona Virus Disease 2019

References

  1. Nigeria Centre for Disease Control. An update of COVID-19 outbreak in Nigeria. https://ncdc.gov.ng/diseases/sitreps/?cat=14&name=An%20update%20of%20COVID-19%20outbreak%20in%20Nigeria. Accessed: 11 Jan 2021.

  2. Dan-Nwafor C, Ochu CL, Elimian K, Oladejo J, Ilori E, Umeokonkwo C, et al. Nigeria’s public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic: January to May 2020. J Glob Health. 2020;10(2):020399.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Oginni OA, Amiola A, Adelola A, Uchendu U. A commentary on the Nigerian response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol Trauma Theory Res Pract Policy. 2020;12(5):553–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ajibo H. Effect of Covid-19 on Nigerian socio-economic well-being, health sector pandemic preparedness and the role of Nigerian social workers in the war against Covid-19. Soc Work Public Health. 2020;35(7):511–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawel A, Shou Y, Smithson M, Cherbuin N, Banfield M, Calear AL, et al. The effect of COVID-19 on mental health and wellbeing in a representative sample of Australian adults. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:579985.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Semo BW, Frissa SM. The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: implications for Sub-Saharan Africa. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020;13:713–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cylus J, Smith PC. The economy of wellbeing: what is it and what are the implications for health? BMJ. 2020;369:m1874.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Donnell G, Oswald AJ. National well-being policy and a weighted approach to human feelings. Ecol Econ. 2015;120:59–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Helliwell J, Layard R, Sachs J. World happiness report 2019. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alradhawi M, Shubber N, Sheppard J, Ali Y. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental well-being amongst individuals in society- A letter to the editor on “The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus and COVID-19 pandemic: a review.” Int J Surg. 2020;78:147–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Agberotimi SF, Akinsola OS, Oguntayo R, Olaseni AO. Interactions between socioeconomic status and mental health outcomes in the Nigerian context amid COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study. Front Psychol. 2020;11:559819.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fadipe B, Oshodi YO, Umeh C, Aikomo K, Ajirotutu OF, Kajero J, Fashanu C, Adeoye AA, Coker AO, Sokunbi M, Nyamali VO, Ajomale T, Gbadebo A, Oni A, Keshinro AO, Ngozi Ejiegbu TA, Bowale A, Akase IE, Mutiu B, Adebayo B, Abdus-Salam I, Bode C, Osibogun A. Psychosocial health effects of Covid-19 infection on persons in treatment centers in Lagos. Nigeria Brain BehavImmun Health. 2021;16:100284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Durowade KA, Sanni TA, Adeniyi MA, Babalola SA, Popoola TA, Adebara IO, Ajayi EA. Psychological, socioeconomic effects of COVID-19 pandemic and associated prevalent self-reported vulnerability factors among residents of Southwest Nigeria. Niger J Med. 2020;29:566–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Balogun M, Banke-Thomas A, Sekoni A, Boateng GO, Yesufu V, Wright O, et al. Challenges in access and satisfaction with reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health services in Nigeria during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(5):e0251382.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohammadi TM, Sabouri A, Sabouri S, Najafipour H. Anxiety, depression, and oral health: a population-based study in Southeast of Iran. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019;16(3):139–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zwiri AM. Anxiety, depression and quality of life among patients with recurrent aphthous ulcers. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(2):112–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pohjola V, Nurkkala M, Virtanen JI. Psychological distress, oral health behaviour and related factors among adolescents: Finnish School Health Promotion Study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Alkan A, Cakmak O, Yilmaz S, Cebi T, Gurgan C. Relationship between psychological factors and oral health status and behaviours. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2015;13(4):331–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marques-Vidal P, Milagre V. Are oral health status and care associated with anxiety and depression? A study of Portuguese health science students. J Public Health Dent. 2006;66:64–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Page M, Somerville-Brown L. Psychotropic drugs and dentistry. Aust Prescr. 2007;30(4):98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Suresh KV, Shenai P, Chatra L, Ronad YA, Bilahari N, Pramod RC, Kumar SP. Oral mucosal diseases in anxiety and depression patients: Hospital based observational study from south India. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7(1):e95-99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Llambés F, Arias-Herrera S, Caffesse R. Relationship between diabetes and periodontal infection. World J Diab. 2015;6(7):927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jin L, Lamster I, Greenspan J, Pitts N, Scully C, Warnakulasuriya S. Global burden of oral diseases: emerging concepts, management and interplay with systemic health. Oral Dis. 2016;22(7):609–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Senusi A, Higgins S, Fortune F. The influence of oral health and psycho-social well-being on clinical outcomes in Behçet’s disease. Rheumatol Int. 2018;38(10):1873–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Slack-Smith L, Hearn L, Scrine C, Durey A. Barriers and enablers for oral health care for people affected by mental health disorders. Aust Dent J. 2017;62(1):6–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kisely S, Baghaie H, Lalloo R, Siskind D, Johnson NW. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between poor oral health and severe mental illness. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(1):83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Torales J, Barrios I, González I. Oral and dental health issues in people with mental disorders. Medwave. 2017;17(8):e7045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kenny A, Dickson-Swift V, Gussy M, Gussy M, Kidd S, Cox D, et al. Oral health interventions for people living with mental disorders: protocol for a realist systematic review. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020;14:24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Abayneh S, Lempp H, Manthorpe J, Hanlon C. Development of programme theory for integration of service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening: protocol for realist systematic review. Int J Mental Health Syst. 2018;12(1):41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review-a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1):21–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Uwadiae E, Osasona SO. Psychological distress amongst undergraduate students of a Nigerian University. Central Afr J Med. 2016;62(5–8):42–8.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Olaseni AO, Akinsola OS, Agberotimi SF, Oguntayo R. Psychological distress experiences of Nigerians during Covid-19 pandemic; the gender difference. Soc Sci Human Open. 2020;2(1):100052.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nri-Ezedi CA, Nnamani CP, Ezeh NI, Okechukwu C, Fasesan O, Ulasi TO. Psychological distress among residents in Nigeria during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Neuropsychiatr Dis J 2020:8–21.

  34. Boni RB. Web surveys in the time of COVID-19. Cad Saude Publica. 2020;36(7):e00155820.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. World Health Organization. Wellbeing measures in primary health care/the DEPCARE project: report on a WHO meeting, Stockholm, Sweden 12–13 Feb 1998.

  36. Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 well-being index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Abiodun O. A validity study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in general hospital units and a community sample in Nigeria. Br J Psychiatry. 1994;165(5):669–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52(1):30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mohammad AH, Al Sadat N, Loh SY, Chinna K. Validity and reliability of the Hausa version of multidimensional scale of perceived social support index. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17(2):e18776.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York, NY: Addendum Guilford Publications; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Brandini DA, Takamiya AS, Thakkar P, Schaller S, Rahat R, Naqvi AR. Covid-19 and oral diseases: crosstalk, synergy or association? Rev Med Virol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Locker D, Clarke M, Payne B. Self-perceived oral health status, psychological well-being, and life satisfaction in an older adult population. J Dent Res. 2000;79(4):970–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Georgieva I. Necrotizing periodontal disease-predisposing factors. A review. Scr Sci Med Dent. 2021;6(2):7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Daly J, Black EAM. The impact of COVID-19 on population oral health. Community Dent Health. 2020;37(4):236–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gasner NS, Schure RS. Necrotizing periodontitis. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Naja F, Hamadeh R. Nutrition amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-level framework for action. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020;74(8):1117–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Cellini N, Canale N, Mioni G, Costa S. Changes in sleep pattern, sense of time and digital media use during COVID-19 lockdown in Italy. J Sleep Res. 2020;29(4):e13074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gasner NS, Schure RS. StatPearls necrotizing periodontitis. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Agou S, Locker D, Muirhead V, Tompson B, Streiner DL. Does psychological well-being influence oral-health-related quality of life reports in children receiving orthodontic treatment? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(3):369–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hawes MT, Szenczy AK, Klein DN, Hajcak G, Nelson BD. Increases in depression and anxiety symptoms in adolescents and young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol Med. 2021:1–9.

  52. Ramkisson S, Pillay BJ, Sartorius B. Anxiety, depression and psychological well-being in a cohort of South African adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. S Afr J Psychiatr. 2016;22(1):935.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Liu Q, Shono M, Kitamura T. Psychological well-being, depression, and anxiety in Japanese university students. Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(8):E99-105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Gomes AC, Rebelo MAB, de Queiroz AC, de Queiroz Herkrath APC, Herkrath FJ, Rebelo Vieira JM, et al. Socioeconomic status, social support, oral health beliefs, psychosocial factors, health behaviours and health-related quality of life in adolescents. Qual Life Res. 2020;29(1):141–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Albanidou-Farmaki E, Poulopoulos AK, Epivatianos A, Farmakis K, Karamouzis M, Antoniades D. Increased anxiety level and high salivary and serum cortisol concentrations in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2008;214(4):291–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gireesh A, Das S, Viner RM. Impact of health behaviours and deprivation on well-being in a national sample of English young people. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2018;2(1):e000335.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Sabbah W, Folayan MO, El Tantawi M. The link between oral and general health. Int J Dent. 2019;2019:7862923.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Oginni OA, Oloniniyi IO, Ibigbami O, Ugo V, Amiola A, Ogunbajo A, et al. Depressive and anxiety symptoms and COVID-19-related factors among men and women in Nigeria. MedRxiv [Preprint] June 09 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.09.21258609. Accessed 08 Aug 2021.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to appreciate all the participants who provided data and contributed their time to make this study possible.

Funding

No external funding was available for study implementation or analysis. This study was self-funded by the investigators.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Child Dental Health, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria

    Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan

  2. Department of Mental Health, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria

    Olanrewaju Ibikunle Ibigbami, Ibidunni Olapeju Oloniniyi, Olakunle Oginni & Olutayo Aloba

Authors
  1. Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olanrewaju Ibikunle Ibigbami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ibidunni Olapeju Oloniniyi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Olakunle Oginni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Olutayo Aloba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MOF conceptualized this study. OO, IOO and OII developed the study protocol and collected the data. OII conducted the initial analyses. MOF drafted the initial manuscript. OO and OA reviewed and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institute of Public Health, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife Health Research Ethics Committee (IPH/OAU/12/1560). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan is a senior editorial consultant with BMC Oral Health. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Folayan, M.O., Ibigbami, O.I., Oloniniyi, I.O. et al. Associations between psychological wellbeing, depression, general anxiety, perceived social support, tooth brushing frequency and oral ulcers among adults resident in Nigeria during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Oral Health 21, 520 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01871-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01871-y

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us