Skip to main content

Association between socioeconomic status and severity of oral epithelial dysplasia using a Taiwanese Nationwide Oral Mucosal Screening Program: a retrospective analysis

Abstract

Background

The study aimed to investigate the association between socioeconomic status and severity of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) using current data from the Taiwanese Nationwide Oral Mucosal Screening Program (TNOMSP).

Methods

This retrospective analysis was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at a general hospital in Taipei, Taiwan. A total of 134 participants were analysed from a previous study database of 150 patients. The inclusion criteria included age > 20 years and a history of either tobacco or betel nut use. Background information, including para-habits such as betel and tobacco use, was analysed using the Pearson chi-square (χ2) test; furthermore, the correlation of background information with OED severity was investigated using logistic regression (mild or moderate/severe).

Results

High school education level (P < 0.001), poor self-awareness (P = 0.002), current betel use (P < 0.001), and tobacco use (P = 0.003) were highly correlated with moderate- and severe OED (P < 0.05). The odds ratio (OR) of education status above senior high school was 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01–0.15, P < 0.001), while that of junior high school was 1. Current betel chewing (OR 6.57 [95% CI 1.17–37.0], P = 0.033) was significantly associated with OED severity compared with never or ex-use of betel.

Conclusions

We found a strong correlation between the severity of OED and current betel use and low education status. The current study revealed that the socioeconomic status, poor self-awareness, and para-habit history of the patients with OED should be evaluated to identify high-risk individuals using TNOMSP.

Peer Review reports

Background

Histopathological grading of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) is predictive for oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) [1]. The proportion of OED associated with malignant transformation is approximately 2.2–38.1% [2, 3]. The histopathological manifestation of oral potentially malignant disorders may be revealed as hyperkeratosis or hyperplasia, to various degrees of dysplasia, categorised as mild, moderate, and high grade according to the severity of cell atypia and epithelial involvement [4]. Therefore, the precision of conventional oral examination (COE) and early diagnosis of OED is crucial for preventing malignant transformation [5].

COE for oral mucosa screening aims to reduce mortality in malignancy and guide preventive interventions for high-risk groups [6]; thus, the definitive diagnosis is crucial. Warnakulasuriya et al. had proposed the term OPMDs and recently updated it as “any oral mucosal abnormality that is associated with a statistically increased risk of developing oral cancer.” This classification of disorders previously included leukoplakia, proliferative verrucous leukoplakia, erythroplakia, submucosal fibrosis, palatal lesions in reverse smokers, oral lichen planus, acinic keratosis, oral lupus erythematosus, and dyskeratosis congenita. Recently, oral lichenoid lesion and oral graft vs. host disease were added, and oral epidermolysis bullosa was removed from the classification due to limited evidence [7, 8].

The major risk factors for OED in patients with OPMDs vary across geographical regions. In Southeast Asia, two well-established risk factors are recognised: betel quid chewing and tobacco smoking [9, 10]. In Taiwan, tobacco smoking and betel quid chewing have been shown to increase the risk of leukoplakia and malignant transformation of OED [11, 12]. Nevertheless, the association between socioeconomic status and the development of malignancy involves poor health education, unfavourable working environments, and many others, which all contribute to malignancy development by complex interactions in society; most importantly, risk behaviours are often seen in the low socioeconomic status groups [13]. In the Asia region, these risk behaviours are notoriously known as betel chewing and smoking; therefore, these serious issues have been designed into effective health policy programmes for the high-risk group, implemented in several countries [14].

COE is a relatively easy procedure used to identify oral lesions [15]. The Taiwanese government has supported oral screening programs for many years [16], and the Taiwanese Nationwide Oral Mucosal Screening Program (TNOMSP) is principally developed and documented in a specific survey [17]. This survey gathers specific background information and para-habits of high-risk individuals. However, a more conclusive diagnosis can be obtained from a specialist after referral from primary health providers such as general dentists or family medicine physicians. By definition, in the referral programme, a specialist such as an oral and maxillofacial surgeon or otorhinolaryngology surgeon, who can provide treatment, is required to perform the needed biopsy. Additionally, a pathologist is required to confirm and document the OED stage from the biopsy; and, according to the current recommendation, a follow-up system for recall and monitoring in high-risk individuals with OPMD and OED should be arranged for effective management [1]. In this retrospective study, we analysed a group of participants documented in the TNOMSP and investigated the association between the socioeconomic status and severity of OED.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at a general hospital in Taipei, Taiwan, to investigate the association between the socioeconomic status and severity of OED using current data from the TNOMSP.

The data were collected within 12 months, from January 1st to December 31st, 2018. A total of 134 participants were analysed from a previous study database of 150 patients; 10 patients were excluded due to their refusal to participate, and 6 patients were excluded as the study design was limited to Han Chinese only. The study was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Tri-service General Hospital (TSGH) of National Defense Medical Center (NDMC), Taipei, Taiwan.

This was a pseudo-anonymised secondary data study; hence, there was no direct patient or public involvement. The study was approved by the institutional review board of TSGH (1-107-05-010). The current study was reported in conformance with the STROBE guidelines.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria:

1. Patient age > 20 years.

2. History of tobacco use, current or past.

3. History of betel nut use, current or past.

Exclusion criteria:

1. Lack of proper informed consent of participation.

2. Non-Han Chinese.

3. Incomplete background information record from the TNOMSP form.

4. Incomplete histopathological diagnosis.

Clinical examination procedure and TNOMSP

The participants were recruited from a previous study involving TNOMSP, developed by the Health Promotion Administration of the Ministry of Health and Welfare and commonly used for oral cancer and OPMD screening in Taiwan. The TNOMSP collects the following background information: name, sex, contact information, age, race, inhabited area, education, history of betel nut and tobacco use, and self-awareness. Personally identifiable information, such as name and contact information, was substituted with numbers. A clinical diagnosis of either OPMDs, suspected oral cancer, or others was obtained from a certified clinical specialist (oral and maxillofacial surgeon) (Fig. 1), who also recorded the lesion sites (Fig. 3). The OPMDs evaluated in the TNOMSP included non-homogenous leukoplakia, homogenous thick leukoplakia, leukoplakia, erythroplakia, erythroleukoplakia, verrucous hyperplasia, submucosal fibrosis, lichen planus, suspected oral cancer, and others. A clinical specialist performed oral lesion biopsy followed by a pathological diagnosis as mild-, moderate-, or severe dysplasia, oral cancer, or others. Finally, various interventions or follow-up visits were recommended for patients with mild dysplasia, and those with moderate and severe dysplasia were indicated for surgical interventions. Several other clinical decisions were made according to the provided guidelines in the institution conducting the study (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study participants recruited from the TNOMSP study with Para-habits of Tobacco or Betel use. a OPMDs diagnosis: Left buccal erythroleukoplakia with current Betel chewing (Noted dental attrition and staining). b OPMDs diagnosis: Oral Submucous fibrosis with current Betel chewing (Noted dental attrition and staining). OPMD: Oral potentially malignant disorders, TNOMSP: Taiwanese Nationwide Oral Mucosal Screening Program

Fig. 2
figure 2

Subjects selected during the clinical examination procedure of TNOMSP

Histopathological data

The study participants agreed to participate and signed a standard informed consent form before biopsy was performed at TSGH. Each sample biopsy underwent histopathological examination by a pathologist. The presence of dysplasia was graded using the World Health Organization (WHO) three-tier system of mild, moderate, and severe dysplasia, oral cancer, or other diagnoses in the biopsy specimen. This was recorded in a report from the pathology department at TSGH, approved stepwise by two pathologists, if dispute the third pathologist for confirmation; the microscopic pictures were randomly selected and presented in our joint departmental meetings.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0.0. (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The responses were coded as numeric to facilitate data entry. The results were analysed using a bar chart for clinical diagnosis of OPMDs, suspected oral cancer, other diseases, and lesion sites. The Pearson chi-square (χ2) test, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were computed to determine any association between the participants’ characteristics and OED, which categorised the histopathologic reports into two groups mild or moderate and severe dysplasia after oral cancer and others diseases were excluded with the level of significance set as two-tailed P < 0.05.

Results

Participants’ demographics

A total of 134 participants out of 150 individuals in the original TNOMSP were collected in the present study (Table 1). The majority of our presented participants were male (n = 117, 87.3% vs. female: n = 17, 12.7%). Regarding education status, 103 participants (76.9%) reached either senior high school level or above. The number of participants residing in the capital (Taipei) and non-capital (Majority of New Taipei city surrounding Taipei city) areas were evenly distributed (n = 67, 50.0% vs. n = 67, 50.0%, respectively). Additionally, most of the participants (n = 114, 85.1%) were unaware of the lesions. Regarding para-habits, 36.6% of the participants were current betel users, while 53.8% were current smokers.

Table 1 Demographic variables and histopathology diagnosis using TNOMSP

Dysplasia in histopathological examinations

The histopathological diagnosis of dysplasia according to the socioeconomic characteristics is shown in Table 1. Of the 134 participants, 70 were histopathologically diagnosed with dysplasia, 58 were diagnosed with others, which were more likely to be benign, and 6 were diagnosed as oral cancer (squamous cell carcinoma). The mean age of participants diagnosed with oral cancer (62.45 ± 13.07 years) was higher than that of both those with dysplasia (58.71 ± 11.77 years) and others (53.34 ± 13.7 years). In addition, men were predominant in all three groups diagnosed with oral cancer, dysplasia, and others (83.3% vs. 81.4% vs. 94.8%). The proportion of patients with education status of senior high school or above was more in both the groups diagnosed with dysplasia and others (71.4%; 86.2%), but it was evenly distributed with those of lower education status in the oral cancer group. The proportion of participants living in the capital and out of it was evenly distributed among patients diagnosed with dysplasia and others; in the oral cancer group, the majority lived outside the capital. Regarding self-awareness, 90% of participants with dysplasia and 87.9% of those diagnosed as others were unaware of the lesion; but all oral cancer participants were aware of the lesion. For the para-habits, more participants diagnosed as others were never or ex-users for betel and tobacco (72.4% and 55.2%), and more participants diagnosed with dysplasia were current users of betel and tobacco (44.3% and 61.4%).

Distribution of OPMDs and lesion sites

The results of COE are listed in Fig. 3. Among the 134 subjects, the predominant diagnosis was others, which was likely to be benign, and among all OPMDs, erythroleukoplakia was the most common (23/134, 17.2%), followed by thin homogeneous leukoplakia (21/134, 15.7%), and suspected oral cancer (10/134, 7.5%). Regarding the distribution of lesion sites, most of the lesions were located on the buccal mucosa (61/134, 45.5%), mandibular gingiva (16/134, 11.9%), and tongue (13/134, 9.7%).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of clinical characteristics of OPMDs, oral cancer, others, and lesion sites. OPMD: Oral potentially malignant disorder

Association between severity of dysplasia and socioeconomic status

Results of the correlation between dysplasia and socioeconomic status are presented in Table 2. We noted a significant correlation between junior high school educational status and moderate/severe dysplasia (P < 0.001). Furthermore, lack of awareness was significantly associated with mild and moderate/severe dysplasia (P = 0.002). Regarding para-habits, current betel (P < 0.001) and tobacco use (P = 0.003) were strongly correlated with moderate/severe dysplasia.

Table 2 Association of demographic variables with the severity of OED

ORs of the association between severity of dysplasia and socioeconomic status

Junior high school educational status had a high OR of 1, while senior high school or above educational status had an OR of 0.03 (95% CI 0.01–0.15; P < 0.001). The current betel users had a high OR of 6.57 (95% CI 1.17–37.0, P = 0.033) (Table 3).

Table 3 Odds ratio for demographic variables from TNOMSP relative to severity of OED

Discussion

Several studies have demonstrated that socioeconomic status influences the development of OPMDs and OED, and the higher the socioeconomic status, the lower the risk of these conditions [13, 18,19,20,21,22]. A large population survey conducted in Taiwan showed a strong correlation between low education status and betel nut use habits, which may be explained by the labouring work in Taiwan with a cultural tradition of betel nut chewing. Moreover, the Taiwan study revealed that 25% of individuals with junior high school status were current betel chewers [23, 24]. This finding is similar to our result of overall dysplasia as we also showed that junior high school education status and current betel chewing were associated with a high risk of OED. Another study in Taiwan reported a 16.5% prevalence of OED among betel quid chewers [25]. Additionally, a hospital-based study revealed an OR of 8.5 (95% CI 4.4–16.2) for the development of oral malignancy among current betel quid chewers with low education status [11]. Moreover, another study in Taiwan revealed an OR of 1.27 (95% CI 0.93–1.75) for the development of OED among current betel chewers compared with non-chewers [26]. Furthermore, a case–control study reported an adjusted OR of 17.43 (95% CI 1.94–156.27) for the occurrence of leukoplakia due to betel nut chewing and smoking [12]. The above studies raised concerns about the increasing risk of malignant transformation in current betel chewers. Our present study also showed a high risk of developing moderate/severe dysplasia among those in the high-risk group (low educational status and current betel chewing).

Initiated in 1985, TNOMSP gradually scaled up to the national level and targeted the high-risk group [16]. High-risk individuals may be defined as tobacco users and betel chewers [27,28,29]. Approximately 90% of mortality resulting from oral malignancy in Southeast Asia occurs among individuals with para-habits, underscoring the need for efficient resource allocation to the high-risk group [30]. Moreover, oral cancer is one of the leading causes of death in adolescent males in Taiwan, with the overall 5-year survival rates for I–IV stages of oral cancer reducing from 70 to 10% [31]. Therefore, early prevention and correct diagnosis of OPMDs are needed to improve patient outcomes.

Most OPMDs are asymptomatic and rarely noticed by the patients, which is also evident in our present study as 85.1% of the participants were unaware of the lesion. The global prevalence of OPMDs is approximately 4.47% and is considered to be higher among Asian males [32]. Male predominance was also observed in our study. OPMDs mainly occur on the buccal mucosa, gingiva, tongue, and floor of the mouth [33,34,35]. Similar findings were reported in this study, with a majority of the lesions occurring on the buccal mucosa, followed by mandibular gingiva and tongue. Our study findings are also comparable to those of a recent large population-based study conducted in southern Taiwan [34]. Regarding the type of OPMDs in our study, erythroleukoplakia (17.2%) was the most common, followed by thin homogeneous leukoplakia (15.7%). When all types of leukoplakia, including non-homogeneous, thick, and thin homogenous leukoplakia, were included in the same group, the prevalence was 24.6%, and this finding is comparable to that of another large population study conducted in Taiwan [35].

Histopathological diagnosis is necessary for clinical grading of pathologic changes in OED and aids decision-making in managing lesions. According to the WHO guidelines, the standard grading system of OED is mild, moderate, and severe [36]. A recent meta-analysis evaluated the malignant transformation rate of mild vs. moderate/severe oral dysplasia. A total of 92 papers were selected and included in the final analysis; the mean follow-up ranged from 12 months to 20 years. Among them, 10 studies differentiated clearly between mild, moderate, and severe dysplasia. In summary, when comparing the risk of malignancy development with OED in moderate/severe dysplasia vs. mild OED, there was a greater risk for malignant transformation in moderate/severe dysplasia, with OR of 2.4 (99% Cl: 1.5–3.8). Further, mild dysplasia had an annual malignant transformation rate of 1.7%, while severe dysplasia was 3.57%, which were both statistically significant [37].

However, some have proposed a binary grading system and encouraged following pathological research [8, 38]. A recent smaller scale meta-analysis included 629 lesions from four different studies and yielded a six-time increased odds of malignant transformation in high-risk lesions over low-risk lesions OR of 6.14 (95% CI 1.18–15.3) [39]. In our present study, we categorised our cases into mild or moderate/severe dysplasia based on our current practices. Individuals with moderate/severe dysplasia undergo surgical excision of the lesions. The underlying reason for surgical excision is the necessity of further sampling, which can investigate the adjacent possible occult malignancy [1]. For mild dysplasia, a follow-up system is recommended, and the patient can undergo less invasive interventions, including cryotherapy, chemoprevention, and photodynamic therapy, which have shown promising results in preventing the malignant transformation of OED [40, 41]. Furthermore, OED has a significant malignant transformation rate. Although several studies we have mentioned suggested surgical excision for proper management of moderate/severe dysplasia, the long-term follow-up period should be less than every 6 months, repeated biopsy should be considered, and the absence of OED in clinical OPMDs diagnosis should not exclude the malignant potential [1, 8, 15, 37, 38]. Finally, even though some OPMDs with or without OED resolve spontaneously over time, the question remains whether the risk of transformation exists in OPMDs and OED after spontaneous resolution or surgical intervention, with or without para-habit cessation [42,43,44].

However, this study had several limitations. First, TNOMSP focuses on high-risk individuals aged > 20 years; thus, underage individuals with para-habits need further investigation. Second, the principle design of TNOMSP excludes the general population with OPMDs. Third, our study was conducted under a retrospective study setting and, our result was obtained from a limited diagnosis setting; a different judgement is hard to include in the study. Therefore, a large-scale investigation and comparison of individuals with para-habits and the general population should be considered with multiple specialties, and long term follow up with repeat biopsy may be consider in future research.

Conclusions

In our study, we reported a high correlation between severe dysplasia and low education status, and current betel use. The socioeconomic status, poor self-awareness, and para-habits history of the patients with OED should be evaluated to identify high-risk individuals. This retrospective study lays the foundation for further investigation of the socioeconomic status and para-habits associated with OED in different regions across Taiwan with a larger population, as well as the evaluation of the efficacy of TNOMSP.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

NDMC:

National Defense Medical Center

OED:

Oral epithelial dysplasia

OMPD:

Oral potentially malignant disorder

OR:

Odds ratio

TNOMSP:

Taiwanese Nationwide Oral Mucosal Screening Program

TSGH:

Tri-Service General Hospital

References

  1. Odell E, Kujan O, Warnakulasuriya S, Sloan P. Oral epithelial dysplasia: recognition, grading and clinical significance. Oral Dis. 2021;27:1947–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnaoutakis D, Bishop J, Westra W, Califano JA. Recurrence patterns and management of oral cavity premalignant lesions. Oral Oncol. 2013;49:814–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuribayashi Y, Tsushima F, Morita KI, Matsumoto K, Sakurai J, Uesugi A, et al. Long-term outcome of non-surgical treatment in patients with oral leukoplakia. Oral Oncol. 2015;51:1020–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pitiyage G, Tilakaratne WM, Tavassoli M, Warnakulasuriya S. Molecular markers in oral epithelial dysplasia: review. J Oral Pathol Med. 2009;38:737–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kujan O, Sloan P. Dilemmas of oral cancer screening: an update. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:3369–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Speight PM, Epstein J, Kujan O, Lingen MW, Nagao T, Ranganathan K, et al. Screening for oral cancer-a perspective from the Global Oral Cancer Forum. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123:680–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Warnakulasuriya S, Johnson NW, van der Waal I. Nomenclature and classification of potentially malignant disorders of the oral mucosa. J Oral Pathol Med. 2007;36:575–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Warnakulasuriya S, Kujan O, Aguirre-Urizar JM, Bagan JV, González-Moles MÁ, Kerr AR, et al. Oral potentially malignant disorders: a consensus report from an international seminar on nomenclature and classification, convened by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Cancer. Oral Dis. 2021;27:1862–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rajaraman P, Anderson BO, Basu P, Belinson JL, D’Cruz A, Dhillon PK, et al. Recommendations for screening and early detection of common cancers in India. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e352–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Human Immunodeficiency Viruses and Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Viruses. Lyon, France, 1–18 June 1996. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 1996;67:1–424.

  11. Ko YC, Huang YL, Lee CH, Chen MJ, Lin LM, Tsai CC. Betel quid chewing, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption related to oral cancer in Taiwan. J Oral Pathol Med. 1995;24:450–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shiu MN, Chen TH, Chang SH, Hahn LJ. Risk factors for leukoplakia and malignant transformation to oral carcinoma: a leukoplakia cohort in Taiwan. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:1871–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Warnakulasuriya S. Significant oral cancer risk associated with low socioeconomic status. Evid Based Dent. 2009;10:4–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Petti S, Masood M, Scully C. The magnitude of tobacco smoking-betel quid chewing-alcohol drinking interaction effect on oral cancer in South-East Asia. A meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e78999.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Walsh T, Warnakulasuriya S, Lingen MW, Kerr AR, Ogden GR, Glenny AM, et al. Clinical assessment for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;12:CD010173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kao SY, Chu YW, Chen YW, Liu TY. Detection and screening of oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions. J Chin Med Assoc. 2009;72:227–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen YK, Huang HC, Lin LM, Lin CC. Primary oral squamous cell carcinoma: an analysis of 703 cases in southern Taiwan. Oral Oncol. 1999;35:173–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hashibe M, Jacob BJ, Thomas G, Ramadas K, Mathew B, Sankaranarayanan R, et al. Socioeconomic status, lifestyle factors and oral premalignant lesions. Oral Oncol. 2003;39:664–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Conway DI, Petticrew M, Marlborough H, Berthiller J, Hashibe M, Macpherson LM. Socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:2811–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee CH, Ko AM, Warnakulasuriya S, Ling TY, Rajapakse PS, Zain RB, et al. Population burden of betel quid abuse and its relation to oral premalignant disorders in South, Southeast, and East Asia: an Asian Betel-quid Consortium Study. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:e17-24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang YT, Ho PS, Jou YY, Wu CY, Wang YW, Yang YH. Determining high prevalence of betel-quid chewing and cigarette smoking by occupation using the Taiwan National Health Interview Survey. Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55:1472–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ko YC, Chiang TA, Chang SJ, Hsieh SF. Prevalence of betel quid chewing habit in Taiwan and related sociodemographic factors. J Oral Pathol Med. 1992;21:261–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wen CP, Tsai SP, Cheng TY, Chen CJ, Levy DT, Yang HJ, et al. Uncovering the relation between betel quid chewing and cigarette smoking in Taiwan. Tob Control. 2005;14:i16-22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee CH, Ko AM, Warnakulasuriya S, Yin BL, Zain RB, Ibrahim SO, et al. Intercountry prevalences and practices of betel-quid use in south, southeast and eastern Asia regions and associated oral preneoplastic disorders: an international collaborative study by Asian betel-quid consortium of south and east Asia. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:1741–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee JJ, Hung HC, Cheng SJ, Chen YJ, Chiang CP, Liu BY, et al. Carcinoma and dysplasia in oral leukoplakias in Taiwan: prevalence and risk factors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:472–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu Y, Sobue T, Kitamura T, Matsuse R, Kitamura Y, Matsuo K, et al. Cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking, and oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer in the Japanese: a population-based cohort study in Japan. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018;27:171–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shiu MN, Chen TH. Impact of betel quid, tobacco and alcohol on three-stage disease natural history of oral leukoplakia and cancer: implication for prevention of oral cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2004;13:39–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sankaranarayanan R, Mathew B, Jacob BJ, Thomas G, Somanathan T, Pisani P, et al. Early findings from a community-based, cluster-randomized, controlled oral cancer screening trial in Kerala, India. The Trivandrum Oral Cancer Screening Study Group. Cancer. 2000;88:664–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vigneswaran N, Williams MD. Epidemiologic trends in head and neck cancer and aids in diagnosis. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2014;26:123–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsai KY, Su CC, Chiang CT, Tseng YT, Lian IB. Environmental heavy metal as a potential risk factor for the progression of oral potentially malignant disorders in central Taiwan. Cancer Epidemiol. 2017;47:118–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mello FW, Miguel AF, Dutra KL, Porporatti AL, Warnakulasuriya S, Guerra EN, et al. Prevalence of oral potentially malignant disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018;47:633–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Napier SS, Speight PM. Natural history of potentially malignant oral lesions and conditions: an overview of the literature. J Oral Pathol Med. 2008;37:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang YY, Tail YH, Wang WC, Chen CY, Kao YH, Chen YK, et al. Malignant transformation in 5071 southern Taiwanese patients with potentially malignant oral mucosal disorders. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Chung CH, Yang YH, Wang TY, Shieh TY, Warnakulasuriya S. Oral precancerous disorders associated with areca quid chewing, smoking, and alcohol drinking in southern Taiwan. J Oral Pathol Med. 2005;34:460–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu W, Bao ZX, Shi LJ, Tang GY, Zhou ZT. Malignant transformation of oral epithelial dysplasia: clinicopathological risk factors and outcome analysis in a retrospective cohort of 138 cases. Histopathology. 2011;59:733–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Reibel J, Gale N, Hille J, Hunt JL, Lingen M, Müller S, et al. Oral potentially malignant disorders and oral epithelial dysplasia. In: El Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ, editors., et al., WHO Classification of head and neck tumours. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2017. p. 112–5.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Iocca O, Sollecito TP, Alawi F, Weinstein GS, Newman JG, De Virgilio A, et al. Potentially malignant disorders of the oral cavity and oral dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of malignant transformation rate by subtype. Head Neck. 2020;42:539–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mehanna HM, Rattay T, Smith J, McConkey CC. Treatment and follow-up of oral dysplasia—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck. 2009;31:1600–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yan F, Reddy PD, Nguyen SA, Chi AC, Neville BW, Day TA. Grading systems of oral cavity pre-malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-L. 2020;277:2967–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chau L, Jabara JT, Lai W, Svider PF, Warner BM, Lin HS, et al. Topical agents for oral cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2017;67:153–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kawczyk-Krupka A, Waskowska J, Raczkowska-Siostrzonek A, Kościarz-Grzesiok A, Kwiatek S, Straszak D, et al. Comparison of cryotherapy and photodynamic therapy in treatment of oral leukoplakia. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2012;9:148–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kuribayashi Y, Tsushima F, Morita KI, Matsumoto K, Sakurai J, Uesugi A, et al. Long-term outcome of non-surgical treatment in patients with oral leukoplakia. Oral Onco. 2015;51:1020–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Roosaar A, Yin L, Johansson AL, Sandborgh-Englund G, Nyrén O, Axéll T. A long-term follow-up study on the natural course of oral leukoplakia in a Swedish population-based sample. J Oral Pathol Med. 2007;36:78–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Holmstrup P, Vedtofte P, Reibel J, Stoltze K. Long-term treatment outcome of oral premalignant lesions. Oral Onco. 2006;42:461–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Tri-Service General Hospital, Taiwan, Republic of China (Grant Nos. TSGH-C05-110035; TSGH-D-110154 and TSGH-C04-111037), Ministry of National Defense, Republic of China (Grant No. MND-MAB-110-076; MND-MAB-110-043 and MND-MAB-C-111036).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TEC contributed to conception and design, data analyses, and interpretation, and drafted the manuscript. YCL contributed to histopathology interpretation. CTW contributed to data acquisition, critically revised the manuscript, and gave final approval. STW critically revised the manuscript and gave final approval. YWC critically revised the manuscript and gave final approval. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan-Wu Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of TSGH (approval no. 1-107-05-010). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Consent to the publication of the image material is given.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiang, TE., Lin, YC., Wu, CT. et al. Association between socioeconomic status and severity of oral epithelial dysplasia using a Taiwanese Nationwide Oral Mucosal Screening Program: a retrospective analysis. BMC Oral Health 22, 56 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02084-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02084-7

Keywords

  • Oral Epithelial Dysplasia
  • Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
  • Taiwanese Nationwide Oral Mucosal Screening Program
  • Socioeconomic Status