Skip to main content
Download PDF

A retrospective study on the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on dental treatments in adults

BMC Oral Health volume 22, Article number: 122 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The aim was to analyze the prevalence of dental treatments that were not performed in a dental care university referral center in the capital of Spain during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study based on the registry of medical records. Sex, age, nationality, and the type of treatment that was not performed in the service of the Integrated Adult Dental Clinic subject of the Dentistry degree at the Rey Juan Carlos University of Madrid were analyzed.

Results

A total of 392 medical records were analyzed. The prevalence of the treatments that were not performed was 58.67% (95% CI 53.74–63.44) of conservative treatments, 47.45% (95% CI 42.55–52.39) of periodontal treatments, 27.30% (95% CI 23.12–31.91) and 13.52% (95% CI 10.49–17.26) of clinical activities. The patients most affected by the absence of dental treatment ranged in age from 35 to 74 years. Age, sex, and nationality were not influential in not performing dental treatments.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic could have negatively influenced treatments, such as conservative and periodontal treatments, that increasing the risk of tooth loss in adults.

Peer Review reports

Background

Severe acute respiratory syndrome due to coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) of the Coronaviridae family causes COVID-19 disease [1]. It has a high contagion capacity and has caused a large number of deaths worldwide [2]. Manifestations of the disease range from asymptomatic development of the disease, mild symptoms, or severe pneumonia [3]. In the field of dentistry, the oral manifestations of the disease are cluded ulcer, erosion, bulla, vesicle, pustule, fissured or depapillated tongue, macule, papule, plaque, pigmentation, halitosis, whitish areas, hemorrhagic crust, necrosis, petechiae, swelling, erythema, and spontaneous bleeding [4]. On the other hand, dentists can be the first line of diagnosis of the disease since they work in close contact with patients and are at risk of being affected by COVID-19 and other respiratory infections [5].

The main routes of transmission of COVID-19 are Flügge droplets (size greater than 5 microns) that are emitted when speaking, coughing, or sneezing [6] and Wells droplets (diameter less than 0.1 microns), with less possibility of transmission from microorganisms. Likewise, transmission can be occur through direct contact of the hands with contaminated fomites, the bucconasal or ophthalmic mucosa [7] or feces [8].

The infection that was first reported in the city of Wuhan (People's Republic of China) in December 2019, became a global public, social, and economic health problem [9], and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020, due to the levels of spread and severity of the disease [10]. During the same month, the Ministry of the Presidency of Spain published Royal Decree 463/2020 in the Spain's Official State Gazette (BOE), declaring a state of alarm to manage the health crisis caused by COVID-19 [11]. The Ministry of Health, Consumption and Social Welfare (SCBS) issued order SND/310/2020, on March 31, which established specific health centers, services, and establishments as essential services, whereas dental clinics did not have this consideration [12].

Worldwide, in the first peak of the pandemic, many dental clinics significantly reduced treatments or stopped their activity [13], limiting themselves to nondeferrable emergency care [14]. Dental repercussions have led us to analyze the experiences of dentists [15, 16], evaluate the general approach against the virus [17, 18], and study its clinical, legal, and economic consequences [19]. The full extent of damage due to the suspension of dental care can be assessed in the number and types of treatments that were not performed on the patient.

In the capital of Spain, the Fundación Clínica Universitaria of the Rey Juan Carlos University (FU-URJC) of Madrid is one of the most important academic and health care centers of public reference in the southern area of the city, in terms of the number of patients treated. Due to the regulations described, this center ceased dental care activity, only performing treatments associated with dental emergencies in the first wave of the pandemic.

The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of dental treatments that were not performed in a university reference center for dental care in the capital of Spain during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendation guidelines [20].

Study context and participants

The treatment plans included the clinical records registered during the 2020–2021 academic year (from September 4, 2020, to April 30, 2021) for the Integrated Dental Clinic for Adults of the fifth year of the Degree in Dentistry was analyzed from Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC), Madrid (Spain), attended by fifth-year students of the Degree in Dentistry.

Subjects of any sex, nationality, aged ≥ 18 years, and in good general health were included. The excluded participants received other health care services from the same entity related to the Dental Clinic for Special Patients and Gerontology and the Integrated Children's Dental Clinic of the Degree in Dentistry.

Variables

The participants' data were collected from the electronic medical records of the URJC University Clinic Foundation by two operators in an independent and anonymized manner.

The variables recorded were age (quantitatively and categorically, following the proposed age ranges of the Spanish National Health Survey [21] divided into the following ranges: 18–24 years, 25–34 years, 35–44 years, 45–54 years, 55–64 years, 65–74 years, 75–84 years, 85 years and older), sex (male or female), nationality (Spanish or foreign) and planned treatments that were not carried out due to the COVID-19 pandemic: conservative treatments, prosthetic treatments, periodontal treatments and clinical activity (such as the first visit, check-ups or other activities not included above).

Sample size

For the sample calculation, the Wald test was performed to compare the proportion of treatments that were not carried out with a hypothetical reference value (90% of the treatments under standard conditions), using a power of 0.8 and a significance value of 0.05, with the estimated effect size of delta = 0.0349.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics of the quantitative and qualitative variables were carried out. The Shapiro–Wilk test was performed to analyze the normality of the data. For the calculation of the confidence interval of the prevalence, the Wilson method was chosen. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to evaluate the influence of sex, age group, and nationality on the number and type of treatments that were not carried out. All statistical tests were performed with a 95% confidence level using Stata 16.1 software (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Three hundred ninety-two medical records were analyzed, and the participants were 220 women (56.12%) and 172 men (43.88%), with a mean age of 52.62 years (SD = 0.85). Participants of foreign nationality represented 7.14% of the sample (Table 1).

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of sex and nationality according to the age range; %: of the total sample
Full size table

In order of frequency, the prevalence of the least performed treatments in the entire sample analyzed were conservative treatment (58.67%), periodontal treatment (47.45%), prosthetic treatment (27.30%), and clinical activities (13.52%) (Table 2).

Table 2 Prevalence of the types of dental treatment that were not performed
Full size table

Regarding age range, in the subjects between 45 and 64 years and 75 to 84 years, periodontal treatment was the type that most frequently remained unperformed. For the rest of the age ranges, conservative treatment most frequently remained unperformed (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Frequency of the category of treatment not carried out according to the age ranges

Full size image

Of the treatments planned for each participant, in 238 subjects (60.71%), one of the treatment categories was not performed; in 124 subjects (31.63%), two of the treatment categories were not performed and in 30 subjects (7.65%), three of the treatment categories were not performed. The combination of periodontal and conservative treatment recommended for the participants was the type that was not performed most frequently (91 subjects, 23.21%), followed by conservative treatment (88 patients, 22.45%) (Table 3).

Table 3 Descriptive statistics of the number of treatment categories not carried out according to the age ranges
Full size table

The multinomial logistic regression model was statistically significant (p = 0.053) and had a low adjustment of the variables (pseudo R2 = 5.45%). Only in prosthetic treatment did male sex (OR = 0.42, p = 0.046) act as a protective factor. For the rest of the variables, there was no influence of sex, nationality or age on the number and category of treatments that were not carried out (Table 4).

Table 4 Multinomial logistic regression assesses the influence of sex, nationality, and age on the number and categories of treatments that were not performed
Full size table

Discussion

The general findings of this study show that conservative treatments were the most affected procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic, regardless of the age interval, followed by periodontal treatment, where almost half of the planned treatments could not be performed. However, 86.48% of the patients in the sample could be treated in other clinical activities, including dental assessments, check-ups, and emergencies.

Since routine care in dental clinics was suspended during the first wave of the pandemic, the undiagnosed or uncontrolled progression of the dental diseases described could be anticipated [19]. The foresight in the reassessment of a patient before the cessation of conservative treatments, such as fillings or endodontics, and the case of neglect of periodontal treatments, such as periodontal study, scaling and root planing, periodontal reassessment, periodontal maintenance, extractions, gingivectomies or coronary lengthening, would fundamentally lead to a progression of periodontal disease. It should be taken into account that the most frequent reasons for tooth extraction in teeth with untreated disease are caries, dental fractures, and periodontal disease [22]. The recent systematic review by Broers et al. [23] shows that the percentage of dental extractions (more radical treatment) due to dental caries is 36% to 55.3%, and for periodontitis, from 24.8% to 38.1%. For this reason, follow-up in the dental planning of the patients led to the negative effects described.

On the other hand, the age groups most affected by the cessation of activity and the absence of conservative and periodontal treatments were patients aged between 35 and 74 years.

Mobility restrictions and the confinement measures were generally applied standards throughout the population [23, 24]. Therefore, it is logical in our study to find that there is no influence of age, sex, or nationality on the number and type of dental treatments that were not performed in patients.

The negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has been evaluated in the pediatric dentistry services of the Brazilian Public Health System [25], which services patients with special needs [26], and its effects on teaching at the educational level. Although academic performance has not been quantified in our study, the number of patients seen by fifth-graders was lower than in other academic years, which may have had a negative impact. Dentistry education was regulated under the management of patients [27, 28], but none of them discriminated by the types of treatments that were not performed. The strengths of this study lie in showing the frequency of planned and unperformed treatments.

Additionally, it must be taken into account that although the number of registered patients in all the services of the FU-URJC (such as the Dental Clinic of Special Patients and Gerontology and Integrated Children's Dental Clinic of the Degree of Dentistry), was 56% lower in the year the pandemic started compared to the previous academic year (the academic year 2018–2019: 14,949 citations, compared to the academic year 2019–2020: 8,372 citations). Although the number of patients analyzed was less than that of the previous academic year, the sample turned out to be sufficiently representative.

It should also be taken into account that this restrospective study only reports on the number of treatments not performed since it was not possible to collect in all cases the information on the reasons why the patient could not attend the appointment. However, the trend and negative impact on dental care is observed during the onset of the pandemic.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic could have negatively influenced treatments, such as conservative and periodontal treatments, that increasing the risk of tooth loss in adults.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BOE:

Spain's Official State Gazette

COVID-19:

Coronavirus Disease 2019

FU-URJC:

Fundación Clínica Universitaria of the Rey Juan Carlos University

SCBS:

The Ministry of Health, Consumption and Social Welfare

Spanish NHS:

Spanish National Health Survey

STROBE:

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology

URJC:

Rey Juan Carlos University

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Bao L, Deng W, Huang B, Gao H, Liu J, Ren L, et al. The pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 transgenic mice. Nature. 2020;583:830–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deshpande K, Pt U, Kaduskar O, Vijay N, Rakhe A, Vidhate S, et al. Performance assessment of seven SARS-CoV-2 IgG enzyme linked immunosorbent assays. J Med Virol. 2021.

  3. Purohit D, Ahirwar AK, Sakarde A, Asia P, Gopal N. COVID-19 and lung pathologies. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2021.

  4. Iranmanesh B, Khalili M, Amiri R, Zartab H, Aflatoonian M. Oral manifestations of COVID-19 disease: a review article. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34:e14578.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mattos FF, Pordeus IA. COVID-19: a new turning point for dental practice. Braz Oral Res. 2020;34:e085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tonkaboni A, Amirzade-Iranaq MH, Ziaei H, Ather A. Impact of COVID-19 on dentistry. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1318:623–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan JF-W, Yuan S, Kok K-H, To KK-W, Chu H, Yang J, et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster. Lancet (London, England). 2020;395:514–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu Y, Guo C, Tang L, Hong Z, Zhou J, Dong X, et al. Prolonged presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in faecal samples. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:434–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. WHO. Timeline of WHO’s response to COVID-19. 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/29-06-2020-covidtimeline. Accessed 13 Aug 2020.

  11. BOE-A-2020-3692. Real Decreto 463/2020, de 14 de marzo, por el que se declara el estado de alarma para la gestión de la situación de crisis sanitaria ocasionada por el COVID-19. 2020. https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2020-3692.

  12. BOE-A-2020-4211. Real Decreto-ley 11/2020, de 31 de marzo, por el que se adoptan medidas urgentes complementarias en el ámbito social y económico para hacer frente al COVID-19. 2020. https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2020/04/01/pdfs/BOE-A-2020-4208.pdf.

  13. Ramírez J-M, Varela-Montes L, Gómez-Costa D, Giovannini G, Romero-Maroto M, Gómez de Diego R. Management of odonto-stomatological emergencies during the COVID-19 alarm state in dental clinics in the Autonomous Community of Madrid (CAM), Spain: an observational study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021;26:e114–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amato A, Caggiano M, Amato M, Moccia G, Capunzo M, De Caro F. Infection control in dental practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17.

  15. Limeres Posse J, van Harten MT, Mac Giolla Phadraig C, Diniz Freitas M, Faulks D, Dougall A, et al. The impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on providing special care dentistry: a survey for dentists. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18.

  16. Khanal N, Singh AK. Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding COVID-19 and its impact on dentistry: a cross-sectional survey among Nepalese dentists. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2020;18:3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson Burkes SO, Kroll M, Colthirst P. A comprehensive overview of the US army dentistry response to COVID-19. Med J (Fort Sam Houston, Tex). 2021; PB 8-21-01/02/03:137–43.

  18. Marcenes W. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dentistry. Community Dent Health. 2020;37:239–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Coulthard P, Thomson P, Dave M, Coulthard FP, Seoudi N, Hill M. The COVID-19 pandemic and dentistry: the clinical, legal and economic consequences—part 2: consequences of withholding dental care. Br Dent J. 2020;229:801–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1495–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2017 ENSE 2017 Metodología.

  22. Chen S-C, Chueh L-H, Hsiao CK, Wu H-P, Chiang C-P. First untoward events and reasons for tooth extraction after nonsurgical endodontic treatment in Taiwan. J Endod. 2008;34:671–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Campus G, Diaz Betancourt M, Cagetti MG, Giacaman RA, Manton DJ, Douglas G, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic and its global effects on dental practice. An international survey. J Dent. 2021:103749.

  24. Carrillo-Diaz M, Ortega-Martínez AR, Romero-Maroto M, González-Olmo MJ. Lockdown impact on lifestyle and its association with oral parafunctional habits and bruxism in a Spanish adolescent population. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021.

  25. Chisini LA, Costa FDS, Demarco GT, da Silveira ER, Demarco FF. COVID-19 pandemic impact on paediatric dentistry treatments in the Brazilian Public Health System. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021;31:31–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dziedzic A. Special care dentistry and COVID-19 outbreak: what lesson should we learn? Dent J. 2020;8.

  27. Spanemberg JC, Simões CC, Cardoso JA. The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the teaching of dentistry in Brazil. J Dent Educ. 2020;84:1185–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu KY, Wu DT, Nguyen TT, Tran SD. COVID-19’s impact on private practice and academic dentistry in North America. Oral Dis. 2021;27(Suppl 3):684–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Doctoral Program in Health Sciences. Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Avenida de Atenas s s/n, 28922, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain

    Diego Gómez-Costa

  2. Department of Morphological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Córdoba, Avenida Menéndez Pidal, 7, Córdoba, Spain

    Juan Manuel Ramírez

  3. Department of Nursing and Stomatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Avenida de Atenas s/n, 28922, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain

    Diego Gómez-Costa, Iván García Guerrero & Rafael Gómez-de Diego

  4. Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X el Sabio University, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691, Madrid, Spain

    Giovanni Giovannini, Rosa Rojo & Rafael Gómez-de Diego

Authors
  1. Diego Gómez-Costa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Manuel Ramírez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Iván García Guerrero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giovanni Giovannini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rosa Rojo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rafael Gómez-de Diego
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, DG-C; methodology, DG-C and RG-de D; validation, DG-C, RG-de D and IGG; formal analysis, RR; investigation, DG-C and RG-de D; resources, DG-C; data curation, RR and GG; writing—original draft preparation, RG-de D; writing—review and editing, DG-C, JMR, GG, IGG and RR; visualization, IGG; supervision, DG-C and RG-de D; project administration, DG-C and RG-de D; funding acquisition, JMR. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosa Rojo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Patient information was anonymized and de-identification prior to analysis. The study was conducted according to the General Data Protection Regulation (RGDP). The local ethics committee (the Rey Juan Carlos University Research Ethics Committee) ruled that no formal ethical approval was required for this study. Patient's informed consent was waived by Rey Juan Carlos University Research Ethics Committee because the data was anonymized.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gómez-Costa, D., Ramírez, J.M., García Guerrero, I. et al. A retrospective study on the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on dental treatments in adults. BMC Oral Health 22, 122 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02160-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02160-y

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us