Skip to main content
Download PDF

Evaluation of factors related to morphological masseter muscle changes after preoperative orthodontic treatment in female patients with skeletal class III dentofacial deformities

BMC Oral Health volume 22, Article number: 292 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The purpose of the current study was to investigate factors related to morphological changes in the masseter muscle after preoperative orthodontic treatment in patients with skeletal class III dentofacial deformities for analysis of muscle changes and malocclusions.

Methods

Twenty female patients with dentofacial deformities were included in the study. Computed tomography was performed before and after preoperative orthodontic treatment, and the lengths, widths, and cross-sectional areas of the masseter muscles were measured. Changes in these parameters were evaluated, and factors related to changes in masseter muscle area after preoperative orthodontic treatment were analyzed.

Results

The lengths, widths, and areas of masseter muscles were significantly smaller after preoperative orthodontic treatment. Smaller masseter muscle area was significantly associated with changes in overbite and pretreatment values of SNA angle.

Conclusions

Atrophy of the masseter muscle during preoperative orthodontic treatment was greater in patients with increased open bite due to improved dental compensation in patients with skeletal class III dentofacial deformities with maxillary retraction.

Peer Review reports

Background

Preoperative orthodontic treatment is generally performed for dental decompensation of the skeletal disharmony between the maxilla and mandible before orthognathic surgery. During preoperative orthodontic treatment, patients often complain of worse masticatory function or articulatory disorders, because the correction is performed assuming the ideal occlusion that the orthognathic surgery is aimed at achieving. Functional improvement is one of the aims of treatment for dentofacial deformities, in conjunction with morphological improvement. The masticatory muscle is one of the most important contributors to mandibular movement, occlusion, and postoperative stability. In previous studies in patients with dentofacial deformities, occlusal forces before orthognathic surgery were smaller than those in normal participants without dentofacial deformities. The maximal occlusal force decreases after orthognathic surgery, and it subsequently improves, though still being less than that in normal participants [1,2,3].

There are no reports of evaluation of masticatory muscles after preoperative orthodontic treatment, although there are some reports of effects after orthognathic surgery [4,5,6].

The purpose of the current study was to investigate factors related to morphological masseter muscle changes after preoperative orthodontic treatment in patients with skeletal class III dentofacial deformities for analysis of muscle changes and malocclusions.

Methods

Participants

Twenty patients with dentofacial deformities who underwent orthognathic surgery at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Kanazawa University Hospital in Japan from 2016 to 2020 were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were the provision of informed consent, being female to avoid gender differences, being aged between 15 and 50 years to evaluate developing and aging, and having skeletal class III dentofacial deformity with or without open bite and with or without mandibular asymmetry to evaluate left and right differences. The exclusion criteria were having more than two missing posterior teeth (excluding third molars or the use of a removable prosthesis), the presence of congenital malformation (cleft palate etc.), any muscle disease, and the presence of any temporomandibular disorder. The research ethics of this study were approved by Kanazawa University Hospital Research Ethical Committee (Ref. No.1765–1).

Morphological masseter muscle measurements

Computed tomography (CT) was performed before and after preoperative orthodontic treatment, and the length, width, and cross-sectional area of the masseter muscle were measured. Patients were instructed to keep their mouths closed, maintain resting positions, and hold their breaths after inspiration during the CT scan. Morphological measurements were performed using the captured CT images via an image analysis software (Aquarius NET, TeraRecon, Foster City, CA, USA). The masseter muscle was measured using previously described methods [5]. Masseter muscle cross-sectional area was measured from 5 mm above the mandibular foramen parallel to the Frankfurt plane [7]. (Fig. 1). All measurements were performed by the same investigator. Each measurement was performed five times using the image analysis software, and the mean of these five measurements was calculated and used in subsequent analyses.

Fig.1
figure 1

Masseter muscle cross-sec < onal area was measured from 5 mm above the mandibular foramen parallel to the Frankfurt plane using CT images

Full size image

Factors related to morphological masseter muscle changes

Patients’ ages were recorded, and body mass index, orthodontic parameters using cephalometric analysis (SNA angle, SNB angle, ANB angle, SN-MP angle, GZN angle, overjet, overbite, deviation from the facial midline at the menton, and deviation between the midpoint between the maxillary central incisors and midpoint between the mandibular central incisors) were measured (Fig. 2). Treatment duration, changes in overjet, and changes in overbite were measured posttreatment.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cephalometric measurements. A Anteroposterior cephalometric measurements. 1;DFFM at Menton (mm), 2;U1-L1 deviation (mm). B Lateral cephalometric measurements. 3;overjet (mm), 4;overbite (mm), 5;SNA angle (°), 6;SNB angle (°), 7;ANB angle (°), 8;GZN angle (°), 9;SN-MP angle (°). Cephalometric landmarks: menton (Me), midpoint of the upper incisor edge (U1), midpoint of the lower incisor edge (L1), sella (S), nasion(N), point A (A), point B (B), gonion (Go), arCculare (Ar). FM: facial midline, DFFM: DeviaCon from the facial midline

Full size image

Statistical analysis

Changes in the above-described measurements and masseter muscle area after preoperative orthodontic treatment were assessed using Prism 7 GraphPad statistical analysis software, (San Diego, CA, USA). Differences in masseter muscle measurements were analyzed using the paired t-test result of preliminary analysis that the data distribution was normality and sample size was calculated by power analysis. Associations between masseter muscle cross-sectional area and other factors were analyzed using linear regression. The independent influences of variables for which significant differences were identified were compared via Pearson’s correlational coefficient.

Results

Changes after preoperative orthodontic treatment

After preoperative orthodontic treatment, the mean masseter muscle length significantly reduced from 38.4 mm (range 30.4–45.8 mm) to 37.2 mm (range 30.7–45.4 mm). The mean masseter muscle width significantly reduced from 11.4 mm (range 9.3–14.6 mm) to 10.2 mm (range 7.4–13.8 mm). The mean masseter muscle cross-sectional area significantly reduced from 381.7 mm2 (range 295.9–519.5 mm2) to 329.8 mm2 (range 249.7–427.0 mm2) (Fig. 3). Only two sides exhibited increases in masseter muscle cross-sectional area after preoperative orthodontic treatment. These two sides were in different patients, and all other patients showed reduced cross-sectional masseter muscle area bilaterally or unilaterally. Posttreatment changes in both masseter muscle cross-sectional area and width of the masseter muscle were significantly lower than the posttreatment changes in length of the masseter muscle (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of masseter muscle length, width and area between before and after preoperative orthodonthic treatment

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Figure shows a greater reduction of with and area compared to length

Full size image

Factors related to change in masseter muscle cross-sectional area

SNA angle and change in overbite were significantly related to change in masseter muscle cross-sectional area (Table 1). Smaller masseter muscle cross-sectional area was significantly associated with smaller overbite and smaller SNA angle (Fig. 5). There was no significant association between change in overbite and SNA angle (Table 2).

Table 1 Factors related to change of cross sectional masseter muscle area
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

RelaFons between changes of cross secFonal masseter muscle area and changes of overbite and SNA angle

Full size image
Table 2 Correlation between Change of overbite and SNA angle
Full size table

Discussion

Atrophy of the masseter muscle during preoperative orthodontic treatment was observed greater in patients with increased open bite due to improved dental compensation in patients with skeletal class III dentofacial deformities with maxillary retraction. Masticatory muscles have been evaluated using various imaging modalities such as CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography [1, 2, 5, 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. In the current study, CT was performed before the start of preoperative orthodontic treatment and before orthognathic surgery for planning treatment. We selected multi-slice CT images for evaluating the masseter muscle pre- and posttreatment, because reproducible image evaluation was possible not only of soft tissues and muscles but also of hard tissue landmarks [14]. With regard to masseter muscle cross-sectional area determined via magnetic resonance imaging and CT in participants with normal craniofacial morphologies, reported values range from 363 to 500 mm2 [8, 10, 11, 13]. In the present study, cross-sectional area of the masseter muscle of both sides of almost patients were within this previously reported range before the start of preoperative orthodontic treatment. However, immediately before surgery, they were below this range. The correlations of masseter muscle cross-sectional area with maximum occlusal force and with masticatory function have been reported [6, 10]. According to these reports, decreased posttreatment masseter muscle cross-sectional area could lead to decreasing masticatory function. Katsumata et al. [12] reported that masseter muscle cross-sectional area was lower in skeletal class III patients with dentofacial deformities who underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional CT imaging. Kikuta et al. [17] reported that occlusal force was decreased 3 months after orthognathic surgery, but increased 6 months after the surgery. The results of the present study suggest that particular attention should be paid to masseter muscle atrophy in patients with worse open bite after preoperative orthodontic treatment and in those with maxillary undergrowth. However, it is not clear if masticatory ability would be compromised by masseter muscle atrophy immediately after the surgery. Decreased maximum occlusal force in patients with open bite has been reported [18], which supports our result that increased open bite led to decreased masseter muscle cross-sectional area. In this study, smaller SNA angle was related to smaller masseter muscle cross-sectional area, which indicated the association between mandibular prognathism and maxillary retrusion. Further investigations analyzing the relationships between skeletal morphology and changes in masticatory muscles are required.

The cells forming skeletal muscles are muscle cells, and they enclose myofibrils. Myofibrils are composed of myosin and actin filaments, which have two heavy chains and four light chains. Myosin heavy chains are generally classified into slow muscle fiber type I and fast muscle fiber type II [19]. Although there are individual differences in the composition of human masseter muscle fibers [20,21,22], more than half of the muscle fibers are type I fibers. Furthermore, myofibrils are affected by maxillomandibular skeletal morphology [23,24,25]. Rowlerson et al. [24] reported that the proportion of type II fibers increases in overcapped cases and decreases in open bite cases. Human masseter muscle may contain embryonic myosin heavy chains and fetal (neonatal) myosin light chains, which are specific myosin isoforms evident during the early development of muscles of the trunk and extremities [26]. It has been reported that the masseter muscle has excellent regenerative capacity [27]. In the masseter muscle after orthognathic surgery, type I fibers were reduced and type II fibers were increased [28], indicating that the masticatory muscle may be affected by environmental factors. Fiber type properties are closely associated with variations in vertical growth of the face, statistically significantly with respect to overall comparisons. Increases in masseter muscle type II fiber areas and percentages of tissue are reportedly inversely related to increases in vertical facial dimensions [20]. Facial biotype characteristics that define vertical facial skeletal pattern affect the cortical bone thickness of mandibular condyle [29]. Type II fibers may be especially reduced in reduced over bite, because in the present study, the atrophy of masticatory muscle cross-sectional area was greater in cases wherein open bite progressed due to preoperative orthodontic treatment. Notably however, pathological examination is needed to confirm this. The potentiality of 3D imaging technology applied to CBCT for the analysis of the skeletal component in this kind of studies was reported [30, 31]. We plan to follow the patients enrolled in the present study and monitor the changes in masseter muscle cross-sectional area after orthognathic surgery using CBCT.

Conclusion

Our study indicated that muscle changes and malocclusions are interrelated and masseter muscle cross-sectional area was reduced in many patients after preoperative orthodontic treatment, suggesting that masticatory function may be reduced in such patients. We should pay attention to masticatory muscle function even after presurgical orthodontic treatment and not only after orthognathic surgery.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

CBCT:

Cone beam computed tomography

References

  1. Tate GS, Throckmorton GS, Ellis Iii E, Sinn DP, Blackwood DJ. Estimated masticatory forces in patients before orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52(2):130–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ueki K, Okabe K, Mukozawa A, et al. Assessment of ramus, condyle, masseter muscle, and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2009;108(5):679–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Iwase M, Sugimori M, Kurachi Y, Nagumo M. Changes in bite force and occlusal contacts in patients treated for mandibular prognathism by orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;56(7):850–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Trawitzki LVV, Dantas RO, Elias-Júnior J, Mello-Filho FV. Masseter muscle thickness three years after surgical correction of class III dentofacial deformity. Arch Oral Biol. 2011;56(8):799–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Trawitzki LVV, Dantas RO, Mello-Filho FV, Marques W Jr. Masticatory muscle function three years after surgical correction of class III dentofacial deformity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39(9):853–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Celakil D, Ozdemir F, Eraydin F, Celakil T. Effect of orthognathic surgery on masticatory performance and muscle activity in skeletal Class III patients. CRANIO®. 2018;36(3):174–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ueki K, Takazakura D, Marukawa K, Shimada M, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E. Relationship between the morphologies of the masseter muscle and the ramus and occlusal force in patients with mandibular prognathism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64(10):1480–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boom HPW, Van Spronsen PH, Van Ginkel FC, Van Schijndel RA, Castelijns JA, Tuinzing DB. A comparison of human jaw muscle cross-sectional area and volume in long-and short-face subjects, using MRI. Arch Oral Biol. 2008;53(3):273–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Naser-Ud-Din S, Sowman PF, Sampson WJ, Dreyer CW, Türker KS. Masseter length determines muscle spindle reflex excitability during jaw-closing movements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;139(4):305–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Valk J, Prahl-Andersen B, Van Ginkel FC. Relationships between jaw muscle cross-sections and craniofacial morphology in normal adults, studied with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Orthod. 1991;13(5):351–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu JA, Yuasa K, Yoshiura K, Kanda S. Quantitative analysis of masticatory muscles using computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1994;23(3):154–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Langlais RP. 3D CT evaluation of masseter muscle morphology after setback osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2004;98(4):461–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ariji Y, Kawamata A, Yoshida K, et al. Three-dimensional morphology of the masseter muscle in patients with mandibular prognathism. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000;29(2):113–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goto TK, Nishida S, Yahagi M, et al. Size and orientation of masticatory muscles in patients with mandibular laterognathism. J Dent Res. 2006;85(6):552–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwon T-G, Lee K-H, Park H-S, Ryoo H-M, Kim H-J, Lee S-H. Relationship between the masticatory muscles and mandibular skeleton in mandibular prognathism with and without asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(8):1538–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Naser-ud-Din S, Thoirs K, Sampson WJ. Ultrasonography, lateral cephalometry and 3D imaging of the human masseter muscle. Orthod Craniofa Res. 2011;14(1):33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kikuta T, Hara I, Seto T, Yoshioka I, Nakashima T, Yasumitsu C. Evaluation of masticatory function after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for patients with mandibular prognathism. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1994;9(1):9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Piancino MG, Isola G, Merlo A, Dalessandri D, Debernardi C, Bracco P. Chewing pattern and muscular activation in open bite patients. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012;22(2):273–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Monster AW, Chan H, O’Connor D. Activity patterns of human skeletal muscles: relation to muscle fiber type composition. Science. 1978;200(4339):314–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sciote JJ, Rowlerson AM, Hopper C, Hunt NP. Fibre type classification and myosin isoforms in the human masseter muscle. J Neurol Sci. 1994;126(1):15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ringqvist M. Histochemical enzyme profiles of fibres in human masseter muscles with special regard to fibres with intermediate myofibrillar ATPase reaction. J Neurol Sci. 1973;18(2):133–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ringqvist M, Ringqvist I, Thornell L-E. Differentiation of fibres in human masseter, temporal and biceps brachii muscles: a histochemical study. J Neurol Sci. 1977;32(2):265–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamada T, Sugiyama G, Mori Y. Masticatory muscle function affects the pathological conditions of dentofacial deformities. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020;56(1):56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rowlerson A, Raoul G, Daniel Y, et al. Fiber-type differences in masseter muscle associated with different facial morphologies. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;127(1):37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sciote JJ, Horton MJ, Rowlerson AM, Ferri J, Close JM, Raoul G. Human masseter muscle fiber type properties, skeletal malocclusions, and muscle growth factor expression. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(2):440–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tuxen A, Bakke M, Pinholt E. Comparative data from young men and women on masseter muscle fibres, function and facial morphology. Arch Oral Biol. 1999;44(6):509–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Soussi-Yanicostas N, Barbet J, Laurent-Winter C, Barton P, Butler-Browne G. Transition of myosin isozymes during development of human masseter muscle. Persistence of developmental isoforms during postnatal stage. Development. 1990;108(2):239–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harzer W, Worm M, Gedrange T, Schneider M, Wolf P. Myosin heavy chain mRNA isoforms in masseter muscle before and after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2007;104(4):486–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lo Giudice A, Rustico L, Caprioglio A, Migliorati M, Nucera R. Evaluation of condylar cortical bone thickness in patient groups with different vertical facial dimensions using cone-beam computed tomography. Odontology. 2020;108(4):669–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lo Giudice A, Ronsivalle V, Lagravere M, Leonardi R, Martina S, Isola G. Transverse dentoalveolar response of mandibular arch after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) with tooth-borne and bone-borne appliances. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(5):680–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Leonardi R, Muraglie S, Lo Giudice A, Aboulazm KS, Nucera R. Evaluation of mandibular symmetry and morphology in adult patients with unilateral posterior crossbite: a CBCT study using a surface-to-surface matching technique. Eur J Orthod. (2020) Jan 29:cjz106.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the member of Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,Clinical Laboratory, Kanazawa University Hospital, sharing ideas, collaborating with the planning and establishment of this study.

Funding

There was no source of funding for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan

    Rei Jokaji, Kazuhiro Ooi & Shuichi Kawashiri

  2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kanazawa University Hospital, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan

    Tetsutaro Yahata

  3. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kanazawa University Hospital, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan

    Yusuke Nakade

Authors
  1. Rei Jokaji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kazuhiro Ooi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tetsutaro Yahata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yusuke Nakade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shuichi Kawashiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R. J and K. O designed most of the experiments and analyzed the data and wrote the main manuscript text and prepared all figures and tables. T. Y and Y.N examined the patients and are the primary person responsible for carrying out all experimental procedures. S.K is the person who drafted the work and made the final approval of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuhiro Ooi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study complied with the principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964, and as amended most recently by the 64th World Medical Assembly, Fontaleza, Brazil, October 2013. This study has been approved by Kanazawa University Hospital Research Ethical Committee (Ref. No.1765–1). All patients were informed, and they consented for the use of their clinical data for research purposes. The informed consent obtained was written by patient.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jokaji, R., Ooi, K., Yahata, T. et al. Evaluation of factors related to morphological masseter muscle changes after preoperative orthodontic treatment in female patients with skeletal class III dentofacial deformities. BMC Oral Health 22, 292 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02319-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02319-7

Keywords

  • Morphological changes of masseter muscle
  • Preoperative surgical orthodontic treatment
  • Skeletal class III dentofacial deformities

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us