Skip to main content
Download PDF

The mediating effect of social support on the association between socioeconomic status and self-reported oral health status among the migrant elderly following children in Weifang, China: a cross-sectional study

BMC Oral Health volume 22, Article number: 619 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Driven by population aging and the rapid urbanization in China, many migrant elderly following children (MEFC) moved to big cities to care for their grandchildren. The purpose of this study is to clarify the mediating effect of social support on the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and self-reported oral health status among the MEFC in Weifang, China.

Methods

Multistage cluster random sampling was used to select the participants and finally 613 MEFC were included in the survey. The Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) and the Chinese version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) scale were used for data collection. Descriptive analysis, Rao-Scott test, t-test and structural equation modeling (SEM) were conducted in this study.

Results

Mean score of GOHAI of the MEFC was 54.95 ± 6.47. The SES of MEFC exerted positive direct effect both on social support (standardized coefficient = 0.15) and self-reported oral health status (standardized coefficient = 0.22); social support exerted positive direct effect on self-reported oral health status (standardized coefficient = 0.17). Social support partially mediated the association between SES and self-reported oral health status [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.003–0.064, P < 0.05], and the mediating effect of social support accounted for 12.0% of the total effect.

Conclusions

Higher GOHAI score of MEFC indicated their better self-reported oral health status. MEFCs’ SES could exert positive effect both on social support and self-reported oral health status, while the mediating effect of social support between SES and self-reported oral health status of MEFC was established.

Peer Review reports

Background

Oral health is a key indicator of overall health, well-being and quality of life, it had proved the relationship between oral and general health [1]. Oral diseases posed a major health burden for many countries and affected people throughout their lifetime, causing pain, discomfort, disfigurement and even death, while oral diseases were caused by many modifiable risk factors and it could largely preventable [2]. Poor oral health among old-age people was an important public health issue and a growing burden to countries worldwide [3].As a group of old-age people, the migrant elderly following children (MEFC) with the dual vulnerable attributes of migration and elderly population [4], MEFC with poor oral health not only suffered from physical discomfort [5], but also led to social isolation [6]. Consequently, the oral health status of MEFC is a significant issue worthy of further researches.

Socioeconomic status (SES) mainly included factors such as income, education, and occupation [7], which was the most overwhelmingly significant risk factor for health and well-being [8], people with low SES were associated with a greater severity of caries [9, 10]. A study in China showed that high income was the protective factor for oral health in older adults [11] and the older adults in South Korea who were from urban area and in good economic conditions had better self-rated oral health status [12]. Positive association between educational level and oral health had been confirmed among older adults [13, 14]. A study indicated that the prevalence of the periodontal disease was found to be significantly higher among the production line workers than administration workers [15]. Studies among preschool children [16, 17] and adolescence [18] also showed that SES was positively associated with oral health. Another study showed that the impact of SES at baseline on oral health–related quality of life at follow-up would be mediated by individual factors, such as social support [19].

Social support was often defined as material and moral support and the exchange of material and moral resources between individuals [20, 21]. Previous studies had showed that social support was associated with periodontal disease in elderly Brazilians [22], individuals were more likely to seek dental care when there was a higher level of social support [23]. Several studies showed social support played an important role in improving oral health outcomes for immigrants [24,25,26]. A larger number of studies had shown that individuals with lower levels of social support often had poorer oral health [27, 28].

Many existed researches had explored the relationship between SES and social support, the results mainly showed that there was a positive relationship between SES and social support [29, 30] and low SES individuals were unable to mobilize social support when needed [31, 32]. Previous studies had found that household monthly income was associated with social support [33] and financial social support was more needed when the SES (especially income) was lower [34]. Previous study had found that the old adults with higher education level had better social support, and the protective qualities of social support were stronger among the individuals who were less educated [35, 36]. A study among teachers, soldier and local health care workers found that local healthcare workers had the lowest social support while soldier had the highest social support [37].

To conclude, previous researches had explored the relationship between SES and oral health, social support and oral health, SES and social support even the mediating effect of social support (social support as a part of individual factors) between SES and oral health, yet no study had clarified the relationship between the SES, social support (social support was separately as a mediating variable) and self-reported oral health status among the MEFC. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the mediating effect of social support on the relationship between SES and self-reported oral health status among the MEFC in Weifang, China. According to the research purpose, four hypotheses were proposed as follow: H1. SES positively predicted self-reported oral health status. H2. Social support positively affected self-reported oral health status. H3. SES positively predicted social support. H4. SES affected oral health through the mediating effect of social support.

Methods

Data collection

A total of 613 MEFC was selected in Weifang City, Shandong Province, China in August 2021. Weifang City is located in the eastern part of China. Up to November 30, 2020, the total household population of the city was 9.19 million and the urbanization rate of the household population was 53.76% [38].

Multistage cluster random sampling was used to select the participants. In the first stage, four districts, Gaoxin district, Kuiwen district, Weicheng district, and Fangzi district, were selected as the primary sampling units (PSUs) based on consideration of the economic development and geographical location of Weifang city. In the second stage, four sub-districts from each PSUs were selected as secondary sampling units (SSUs). In the third stage, four communities were selected from each of the SSUs. The migrant population aged 60 years or older in the selected communities who came to live in Weifang with their children constituted the entire sample for this study. The inclusion criteria for participants were: (1) 60 years old and above; (2) non-local people; (3) come to Weifang for 3 months and above; (4) clear awareness and cognition.

The formula used to calculate the sample size is as follows:

$$n=deff\frac{{u}^{2}p(1-p)}{{\varepsilon }^{2}}$$

In the formula above, the design efficiency \(deff\) = 2.5, the level of confidence µ = 1.96, the margin of error ε = 10%, the prevalence of caries in the age group above 65 years old in the third national epidemiological survey of oral health status was p = 86.0%, and the non-response rate was 10% [39], so a minimum of 464 participants would be needed for the study.

After completing the offline training on research background, questionnaire content, and social survey techniques, a total of 25 university students were assigned as research investigators for this study, the investigators conducted face-to-face interviews with each participant for approximately 20 min and the total investigation lasted 1 week. Initially, 616 MEFCs were selected and interviewed. However, three participants were excluded as they answered their questionnaires incorrectly or incompletely. Ultimately, a total of 613 participants were included in the database.

Measurement

The main information collected from the survey included: (1) sociodemographic characteristics: gender, age, hukou (a household registration system used in China), marital status; (2) SES: education, job before retire and monthly household income; (3) social support: Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) was used to assess the social support of MEFC; (4) self-reported oral health status: Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) scale was used to assess the self-reported oral health status of MEFC.

Socio-demographic characteristics

According to the previous study [40, 41], socio-demographic information included the following four parts: gender (male, female), age, hukou (rural, urban), marital status (married or unmarried, divorced, widowed).

SES

Social stratification refers to the range of social classes that result from variations in socioeconomic status [42], which are usually measured by the social factors like wealth, income, education, family background, and power [43]. In the field of sociology, Karl Marx and Max Weber were two famous sociologists on social stratification/class theory, as well as in China. Karl Marx created his social stratification theory based on the unequal access to the means of production which created a distinction between the bourgeoisie and proletariat [44, 45], while Max Weber formed a three-component theory of stratification in which social difference was determined by class, status and power [46, 47]. Based on Marx and Weber’s theory, some Chinese scholars had put forward different research conclusions from different angles on social stratification of the Chinese population, such as Xueyi Lu’s "gentrificating modern society theory" which believed that the trend of gentrification of the modern social structure is emerging in China; Qiang Li’s "fragmentation theory" which emphasized the diversity of the social differentiation while the hierarchical structure is difficult to form in China [48]. Combining the above Western and Chinese scholars’ stratification theory which highlighted the important role of income and occupation, this study furtherly added education to assess the MEFC’s SES; that is, SES was measured by three variables in this study: monthly household income (≤ 240 Renminbi (RMB), 241–3000 RMB, > 3000 RMB), job before retire (agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery, others), and education (primary school and below, junior high school, high school and above).

SSRS

SSRS was developed by Xiao [49], included 10 items and three dimensions: objective social support, subjective social support and social support utilization. The scale score varies from 12 to 66 and were classified into three levels: high (45–66), medium (23–44), low (≤ 22), the higher the score, the higher the level of social support. Existed researches showed SSRS had good reliability and validity in Chinese population [50].

GOHAI

GOHAI scale is a general oral health assessment index, proposed in 1990 by Atchison and Dolan [51]. The main application of the scale is for the elderly and had been translated into Chinese [52, 53], French [54], Urdu [55] and other languages [56]. GOHAI contains three dimensions: physiological function, psychosocial function, pain and discomfort, and had good reliability and validity in Chinese population [52]. The total GOHAI score was used to classify the oral health of the elderly into three levels: high (57–60), medium (51–56), and low (≤ 50) [51, 52]; the higher score of total GOHAI scale indicating the better of self-reported oral health status.

Analytical approach

Descriptive statistics was used to describe the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants. The Chi-square test was employed to clarify the hukou differences in the socio-demographic characteristics (gender, age and marital status), and t-test was used to assess the hukou differences in the self-reported oral health status and social support indicators respectively. P-values of less than 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant. All the analyses above were performed by using SPSS version 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

SEM was conducted to examine the relationship between SES, social support and self-reported oral health status of the MEFC by using SPSS Amos 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The model in the SEM consists of two kinds of variables: exogenous variable and endogenous variable. In this study, the endogenous variables were social support and self-reported oral health status, while the exogenous variable was SES.

Assessment of the model fitness calculates how the proposed model might be consistent with the empirical data. Maximum-likelihood estimation was used to estimate the best-fitting model in this study. The Chi-square value is called CMIN in Amos. CMIN/DF, GFI, AGFI, CFI, NFI, IFI, RMSEA would be adopted as the fitness indices in the current study. The models were regarded to be a good fit when P > 0.05; CMIN/DF range 1 to 3; GFI > 0.90; AGFI > 0.90; NFI > 0.90; IFI > 0.90; CFI > 0.90 and RMSEA < 0.05 [57].

Bootstrap tests (sampling process was repeated 1000 times) were conducted to determine the total, indirect and direct effect of the model in SEM [58]. The indirect effect was regarded as statistically significant if the 95% confidence interval (CI) excluded zero and thus the mediating effect did exist in this way.

Ethical considerations

The survey and data use had obtained the informed consent of all participants. The research program of this was reviewed and approved by the ethical committee of Shandong University (No. 20180225). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Results

Sample characteristics

Table 1 shows the basic information of socio-demographic characteristics, SES, social support and self-reported oral health status of MEFC. It was illustrated that 85.6% of the MEFC were from rural areas, while 14.4% from urban areas; most MEFC were female (73.1%), aged 60–65(55.8%), married (87.9%). As for SES, majority of MEFC had an education level of primary school and below (56.4%), job before retire were farming, forestry, livestock and fishing (75.2%), monthly household income were 241–3000 RMB (47.1%). With respect to social support, the mean score of social support was 38.88 ± 6.63 among the MEFC in Weifang City, China. As for the self-reported oral health status, the mean score of GOHAI was 54.95 ± 6.47 for the MEFC in Weifang City, China.

Table 1 Descriptive characteristic of participants by hukou
Full size table

Concerning the rural and urban differences, as shown in Table 1, statistically significant differences were found between hukou and gender (P < 0.001), age (P = 0.009), education (P < 0.001), job before retire (P < 0.001), monthly household income (P < 0.001), and social support utilization dimensions (P = 0.027). It was noted that statistically significant difference was also found between hukou and the three dimensions of GOHAI (physiological function (P = 0.007), psychosocial function (P = 0.007), pain and discomfort (P = 0.005).

Model fitness indices

Table 2 shows the model fitness indices of the structural equation model. The estimated value of model fitness for the model were: CMIN/DF = 1.675 in the range of 1–3, GFI = 0.985 > 0.90, AGFI = 0.973 > 0.90, NFI = 0.967 > 0.90, IFI = 0.986 > 0.90, CFI = 0.986 > 0.90 and RMSEA = 0.033 < 0.05, indicating that the theoretical model fit the empirical data very well.

Table 2 Structural equation model fitness index
Full size table

The standardized total, direct, and indirect effects on self-reported oral health status with social support as mediators

Specifically, bootstrap test suggested that after adjusting for covariates, Fig. 1 and Table 3 showed that the total effect of SES on self-reported oral health status was 0.24 (95% CI 0.137–0.323, P < 0.005). The direct effect of SES on self-reported oral health status was 0.22 (95% CI 0.105–0.317, P < 0.001). The indirect mediating effect via social support was 0.03 (95% CI 0.003–0.064, P < 0.001). The effects above were all statistically significant since the 95% CI excluded zero, implying he association between SES and self-reported oral health status was partially mediated by social support; of which the indirect effect accounted for 12.0% of the total effect.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The mediation model of the association between SES and self-reported oral health status through social support

Full size image
Table 3 The standardized total, direct, and indirect effects
Full size table

Discussion

Self-reported oral health status of MEFC in Weifang, China

The mean score of the GOHAI was 54.95 ± 6.47 among the MEFC in Weifang, China, while statistically significant difference of the mean score of the GOHAI between the urban and rural MEFCs were found. Comparing with the GOHAI score of the elderly in Minhang District, Shanghai, China (39.68 ± 7.65) [59], the self-reported oral health status of MEFC in Weifang was higher. This may be due to the average age of MEFC included in our database was 66.29 years old, while the average age in that study was 68.33 years old. Generally speaking, the self-reported oral health status of the younger elderly tended to be better than the older elderly. Moreover, most of the elderly who migrated with their children to take care of grandchildren tend to be in better global health status compared to other elderly since the baby caring needs more physical power and energy. Another study found that the mean score of GOHAI among the middle-aged and older adults in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (provincial level), China was 56.00 ± 7.00 [60], which was similar to the findings of this study. Moreover, the differences between urban and rural areas on self-reported oral health status was similar to a study conducted among the elderly in Sichuan Province, China [61].

The mediating effect of social support on the relationship between SES and self-reported oral health status of MEFC in Weifang, China

The relationship between SES and self-reported oral health status

It was found that SES could exert its positively direct effect and positively indirect effect on the self-reported oral health status of MEFC, the total effect of SES on self-reported oral health status was 0.24, signified that SES had a positive effect on self-reported oral health status and in this model, the correlation coefficient between two variables was 0.24. This finding was similar to the previous study in Sarajevo which was found the positive effect between SES and self-reported oral health status was also found among children [62]. Specially, it was found that education level was positively influenced the self-reported oral health status, which was similar to the study in South-East Norway [41]. It was also found that income was positively influenced the self-reported oral health status and was similar to the study among Pregnant Women [63]. Finally, it was found in this study that job before retire was also positively associated with self-reported oral health status, which was similar to the previous study [15].

Relationship between social support and self-reported oral health status

Positive association between social support and self-reported oral health status was found in this study, implying the higher level of social support of MEFC, the higher level of their self-reported oral health status. The effect of social support on self-reported oral health status was 0.17, signified that social support had a positive effect on self-reported oral health status and in this model, the correlation coefficient between two variables was 0.17. Previous study had shown that social support had a significant effect on health among the old adults [64], which was similar to the findings of this study. Moreover, the financial support was found to be positively associated with the oral health [65]. Due to the social support of MEFC generally tends to be higher when they live with their children, and the health-related knowledge received from their children after living together during daily communication would also improve the self-reported oral health status of the MEFC to a certain extent.

The mediating effect of social support

The relationship between SES and self-reported oral health status was partially mediated by social support with an effect size of 12% and the SES indirect mediating effect via social support was 0.03, signified that social support had a positive mediating effect between SES and self-reported oral health status and in this model, the correlation coefficient was 0.03. Previous studies had already found that the social support was positively associated with oral health [27, 64], indicating the higher level of social support, the more likely to have good self-reported oral health status. A study had shown that SES could promote the health status by increasing social support among Chinese older adults [64]. These findings were similar to the results of this study, that is, the higher SES, the more social support, the better oral health of the elderly [66]. This study showed that SES and social support had positive effects on self-reported oral health status of MEFC, and SES had an indirect positive effect on self-reported oral health status of MEFC through social support. MEFC with higher SES could generally have more resources and social support, which would furtherly have a positive impact on their self-reported oral health status.

Implications

Based on the results above in this study, targeted suggestions on improvement of SES, social support and promotion of the oral health of the MEFC were given as follow.

Firstly, family members, especially the children of MEFC, should provide more social support (both financial and emotional support) for the MEFC, and bring them more knowledge about oral health care while providing social support, so that the MEFC could understand the scientific methods of protecting the oral cavity. Secondly, the community could design more programs and create activities for the MEFC, which could increase the interpersonal communication between the MEFC and their neighbors and friends, enhance the social support level of MEFC. Thirdly, the primary healthcare center could conduct health education activities in conjunction with various health themes and distributes oral health-related educational materials for MEFC to promote health behaviors and improve their health through health education. Finally, government could increase the pension fee to increase the household income; concerning the educational attainment, lifelong learning policy should be established and promoted among MEFC by the government.

Limitations

There are several limitations to this study. Firstly, because of the COVID-19 pandemic, we only completed the questionnaire survey in Weifang and failed to start the survey in Shanghai as planned, which may provide more information about MEFC in China. Secondly, according to Baron and Kenny’s study [67], the independent variable, dependent variable and mediation variable are all required to be continuous variables for the classic mediation effect analysis, while the independent variables (SES) were categorical variables in the current research, this may influence the result of this study. Thirdly, previous studies also clarified the effect of self-efficacy [68], gender [18], smoking [69] on oral health yet were not shown in the current study, thus more researches are needed in the future to explore these variables’ (such as confounding bias) effect on the association between SES and self-reported oral health status among MEFC.

Conclusion

In summary, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to explore the mediating effect of social support between SES and self-reported oral health status among the MEFC in Weifang, China. The main findings of this study were: (1) higher GOHAI score of MEFC indicated their better self-reported oral health status; (2) MEFCs’ SES exerted positive effect both on self-reported oral health status and social support, and (3) the mediating effect of social support between SES and self-reported oral health status of MEFC was established. Targeted implication for the government, primary healthcare center, community and family members were proposed to improve the self-reported oral health status of MEFC.

Availability of data and materials

Under reasonable requirements, the data and material of this study can be obtained from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Abbreviations

MEFC:

Migrant elderly following children

SES:

Socioeconomic status

SSRS:

Social Support Rating Scale

GOHAI:

Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index scale

SEM:

Structural equation modeling

CI:

Confidence interval

PSUs:

Primary sampling units

SSUs:

Secondary sampling units

RMB:

Renminb

S.D.:

Standard deviation

CMIN:

Chi square

DF:

Degree of freedom

GFI:

Goodness of Fit Index

AGFI:

Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index

NFI:

Normed Fit Index

IFI:

Incremental Fit Index

CFI:

Comparative Fitness Index

RMSEA:

Root-mean square error of approximation

References

  1. WHO. Oral health. 2022. https://www.who.int/health-topics/oral-health#tab=tab_1. Accessed 28 Aug 2022.

  2. WHO. Oral health. 2022. https://www.who.int/zh/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/oral-health. Accessed on 28 Aug 2022.

  3. Petersen PE, Yamamoto T. Improving the oral health of older people: the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005;33(2):81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Juhua Y. Attributes of elderly migrants: evidence from the 2016 MDSS in China. Popul J. 2018;40(04):43–58 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yiying W, Yizhou J, Yun C, Lisha Y, Jie Z, Na W, et al. Associations of oral hygiene with incident hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population based cohort study in Southwest China. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022;24(4):483–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koyama S, Saito M, Cable N, Ikeda T, Tsuji T, Noguchi T, et al. Examining the associations between oral health and social isolation: a cross-national comparative study between Japan and England. Soc Sci Med. 2021;277:113895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pimentel MD, Eusebio JR, Amezcua L, Vasileiou ES, Mowry EM, Hemond CC, et al. The impact of socioeconomic status on mental health and health-seeking behavior across race and ethnicity in a large multiple sclerosis cohort. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;58:103451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Syme SL, Lefkowitz B, Krimgold BK. Incorporating socioeconomic factors into U.S. health policy: addressing the barriers. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21(2):113–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Costa SM, Martins CC, Pinto MQC, Vasconcelos M, Abreu MHNG. Socioeconomic factors and caries in people between 19 and 60 years of age: an update of a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(8):1775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Knorst JK, Sfreddo CS, Meira GDF, Zanatta FB, Vettore MV, Ardenghi TM. Socioeconomic status and oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2021;49(2):95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yunjuan Y, Jing D, Jieqing M, Tao M, Shulin L. Study on influence of socioeconomic status on oral health of elderly. Med Soc. 2017;30(10):61–2 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chiyoung L, Jee-Seon Y. Socioeconomic classes among oldest-old women in South Korea: a latent class analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(24):13183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baniasadi K, Armoon B, Higgs P, Bayat AH, Mohammadi GM, Hemmat M, et al. The Association of Oral Health Status and socio-economic determinants with Oral Health-Related Quality of Life among the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Dent Hyg. 2021;19(2):153–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bomfim RA, Frias AC, Cascaes AM, Pereira AC. Functional dentition and associated factors in Brazilian elderly people: a multilevel generalised structural equation modelling approach. Gerodontology. 2018;35(4):350–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Janapareddy K, Parlapalli V, Pydi S, Pottem N, Chatti P, Pallekonda A. Oral Health Status and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) among steel factory workers of Visakhapatnam—a cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(10):5309–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tingting Z, Jialan H, Xueting Y, Qiulin L, Andi L, Zhijing W, et al. Association between socioeconomic status and dental caries among Chinese preschool children: a cross-sectional national study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(5):e42908.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pereira LF, de Deus MLM, de Moura MS, Nogueira NG, Lima C, de Fatima ADML. Does outpatient dental treatment have impact on the quality of life of children with early childhood caries? Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(2):1605–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ortiz FR, Emmanuelli B, de Campos AM, Ardenghi TM. Oral health-related quality of life determinants throughout adolescence: a cohort study in Brazil. Qual Life Res. 2022;31(8):2307–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta E, Robinson PG, Marya CM, Baker SR. Oral health inequalities: relationships between environmental and individual factors. J Dent Res. 2015;94(10):1362–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1990;55(3–4):610–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wenjiao Y, Yanfei H, Yu C, Wenting L, Fan F, Julan X, et al. Personality characteristics and emotional distress among chinese pregnant women: a moderated mediation model. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:645391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bomfim RA, Frias AC, Pannuti CM, Zilbovicius C, Pereira AC. Socio-economic factors associated with periodontal conditions among Brazilian elderly people—multilevel analysis of the SBSP-15 study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(11):e206730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nahouraii H, Wasserman M, Bender DE, Rozier RG. Social support and dental utilization among children of Latina immigrants. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008;19(2):428–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dahlan R, Ghazal E, Saltaji H, Salami B, Amin M. Impact of social support on oral health among immigrants and ethnic minorities: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(6):e218678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jang Y, Yoon H, Park NS, Chiriboga DA, Kim MT. Dental care utilization and unmet dental needs in older Korean Americans. J Aging Health. 2014;26(6):1047–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haag DG, Santiago PR, Schuch HS, Brennan DS, Jamieson LM. Is the association between social support and oral health modified by household income? Findings from a national study of adults in Australia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weber S, Hahnel S, Nitschke I, Schierz O, Rauch A. Older seniors during the COVID-19 pandemic-social support and oral health-related quality of life. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(9):1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vettore MV, Ahmad S, Machuca C, Fontanini H. Socio-economic status, social support, social network, dental status, and oral health reported outcomes in adolescents. Eur J Oral Sci. 2019;127(2):139–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schoon I, Henseke G. Social inequalities in young people’s mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: do psychosocial resource factors matter? Front Public Health. 2022;10:820270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rashidi FF, Doulabi MA, Mahmoodi Z. Predict marital satisfaction based on the variables of socioeconomic status (SES) and social support, mediated by mental health, in women of reproductive age: path analysis model. Brain Behav. 2022;12(3):e2482.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mickelson KD, Kubzansky LD. Social distribution of social support: the mediating role of life events. Am J Community Psychol. 2003;32(3–4):265–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Geckova A, van Dijk JP, Stewart R, Groothoff JW, Post D. Influence of social support on health among gender and socio-economic groups of adolescents. Eur J Public Health. 2003;13(1):44–50 (comparative study).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xuehui F, Qian W, Shasha T, Zhiwei X, Yanfeng Z, Dongchun M, et al. Social support and depression among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Anhui, China. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022;15:595–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ying L, Sarwar M, Horn SV. Child loss, social capital, and depressive symptoms among elderly adults in urban and rural China. J Aging Health. 2019;31(2):343–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Brummett BH, Barefoot JC, Vitaliano PP, Siegler IC. Associations among social support, income, and symptoms of depression in an educated sample: the UNC Alumni Heart Study. Int J Behav Med. 2003;10(3):239–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. North RJ, Holahan CJ, Moos RH, Cronkite RC. Family support, family income, and happiness: a 10-year perspective. J Fam Psychol. 2008;22(3):475–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chi Z, Qin Z, Wei N, Lingming K. A study on the relationship between sleep quality and self-efficacy and social support in different occupational groups. People’s Mil Surg. 2018;61(09):793–6 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Overview of Weifang City. http://www.weifang.gov.cn/rwyd/wfgl/. Accessed on 29 Aug 2022.

  39. Rui S, Tao H, Yi-Si Z, Xue L, Yi-Bo G, Yi-Fan W, et al. Socio-demographic factors, dental status and health-related behaviors associated with geriatric oral health-related quality of life in Southwestern China. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jieru W, Jinfeng Z, Tingting T, Xiaoxu J, Hexian L, Mingli P, et al. The effects of oral health and social support on health-related quality of life of migrant older with children in Weifang, China. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lyshol H, Grotvedt L, Fagerhaug TN, Feuerherm AJ, Jakhelln G, Sen A. A study of socio-economic inequalities in self-reported oral and general health in South-East Norway. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):13721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Global stratification and inequality. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Sociology/Introduction_to_Sociology/Book%3A_Sociology_(Boundless)/08%3A_Global_Stratification_and_Inequality/8.02%3A_Global_Stratification/8.2A%3A_Global_Stratification_and_Inequality. Accessed on 11 Nov 2022.

  43. What is social stratification? https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/9-1-what-is-social-stratification. Accessed on 11 Nov 2022.

  44. Grusky DB. Social stratification: class, race, and gender in sociological perspective. 4th ed. London: Routledge; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Marx’s View of Class Differentiation. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Courses/Collin_College/Introduction_to_Sociology/09%3A_Global_Stratification_and_Inequality/9.04%3A_Sociological_Theories_and_Global_Inequality/9.4E%3A_Marxs_View_of_Class_Differentiation#:~:text=In%20Marx%E2%80%99s%20view%2C%20social%20stratification%20is%20created%20by,main%20economic%20parts%3A%20the%20substructure%20and%20the%20Superstructure. Accessed on 11 Nov 2022.

  46. Qiang L. The lectures on social stratification. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic; 2011. p. 32 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Weber’s View of Stratification. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Sociology/Introduction_to_Sociology/Book:_Sociology_(Boundless)/08:_Global_Stratification_and_Inequality/8.06:_Sociological_Theories_and_Global_Inequality/8.6F:_Webers_View_of_Stratification#:~:text=Max%20Weber%20formed%20a%20threecomponent%20theory%20of%20stratification,may%20or%20may%20not%20be%20influenced%20by%20class. Accessed on 11 Nov 2022.

  48. Peng C. A comparative research for social stratification theory of three classical traditions—by the analysis perspective of “who gets what and why will be.” Manag Rev Soc Sci. 2011;2011(03):85–91 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Shuiyuan X. Theoretical foundations and research applications of the Social Support Rating Scale. J Clin Psychiat. 1994;4(2):3 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jiwen L, Fuye L, Yulong L. Investigation of reliability and validity of the social support scale. Xinjiang Yike Daxue Xuebao. 2008;2008(01):1–3 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Atchison KA, Dolan TA. Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. J Dent Educ. 1990;54(11):680–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. JunKai L, ADan W. Development of the Chinese version of geriatric oral health assessment index (GOHAI). Chin J Geriatr Dent. 2003;2003(03):5–9 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wong MCM, Liu JKS, Lo ECM. Translation and validation of the Chinese version of GOHAI. J Public Health Dent. 2002;62(2):78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Tubert-Jeannin S, Riordan PJ, Morel-Papernot A, Porcheray S, Saby-Collet S. Validation of an oral health quality of life index (GOHAI) in France. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31(4):275–84 (validation study).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Chaudhary FA, Siddiqui YD, Yaqoob MA, Khalid MD, Butt DQ, Hameed S. Psychometric properties of the Urdu version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) and oral health-related quality of life in the elder Pakistani population. Gerodontology. 2021;38(4):366–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Gutierrez QB, Calzada GM, Fandino-Losada A. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index—GOHAI—Colombian version. Colomb Med (Cali). 2019;50(2):102–14 (validation study).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Minglong W. Structural equation modeling: operation and application of AMOS. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press; 2010. p. 52–3 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hayes FA. Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monograph. 2009;76(4):408–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Junyan C, Qingmin Y. Current status of oral health-related quality of life of the elderly and its influencing factors. Chin General Pract Nurs. 2021;19(29):4137–40 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Andy L, Qiulin L, Minqiong W, Xueting Y, Wenxia C, Xiaojuan Z. Survey of oral health-related quality of life in middle-aged and elderly populations in Guangxi and analysis of influencing factors. J Guangxi Med Univ. 2020;37(02):292–7 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Yue Z, Lei L, Yingming Y, Li C, Jinfeng H, Tao H. Association between socio-economic status and periodontal health status in elderly people in Sichuan Province. Chin J Geriatr Dent. 2021;19(06):333–8 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Karamehmedovic E, Bajric E, Virtanen JI. Oral health behaviour of nine-year-old children and their parents in Sarajevo. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):3235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Corchuelo-Ojeda J, Gonzalez PG, Casas-Arcila A. Factors associated with self-perception in oral health of pregnant women. Health Educ Behav. 2022;49(3):516–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Yanyan Z. A study on the social support’s mediating function in socio-economic status influence to elderly health. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology; 2018. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Maida CA, Marcus M, Spolsky VW, Wang Y, Liu H. Socio-behavioral predictors of self-reported oral health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(3):559–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Xiaohang Z. Socioeconomic status, lifestyle, social support, and health status among older adults—based on data from China family panel studies 2010. Sci Res Aging. 2014;2(05):63–73 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Allen F, Fan SY, Loke WM, Na TM, Keng YG, Mittal R. The relationship between self-efficacy and oral health status of older adults. J Dent. 2022;122:104085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. AlQobaly L, Abed H, Alsahafi Y, Sabbah W, Hakeem FF. Does smoking explain the association between use of e-cigarettes and self-reported periodontal disease? J Dent. 2022;122:104164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research team greatly appreciates the funding support, and the research participants for their cooperation and support.

Funding

This study was supported and funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71804094), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2016M592161), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2016GB02), Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. 201603021), and Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University (Nos. 2015HW002, 2018JC055).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China

    Mingli Pang, Jieru Wang, Tingting Tian, Jinfeng Zhao, Xiaoxu Jiang, Hexian Li & Fanlei Kong

  2. NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China

    Mingli Pang, Jieru Wang, Tingting Tian, Jinfeng Zhao, Xiaoxu Jiang, Hexian Li & Fanlei Kong

Authors
  1. Mingli Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jieru Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tingting Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jinfeng Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaoxu Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hexian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Fanlei Kong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MP analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript, joined the data collection; JW, JZ and TT joined the data collection, gave many valuable comments on the draft and also polished it; XJ, HL joined the data collection, gave advices on statistical analysis, data processing and comments on the modification of manuscript; FK applied the fund to support this study, designed the study, completed the questionnaire design, supervised and combined the data collected, instructed the writing, statistical analysis, data processing and provided comments on the modification of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fanlei Kong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The survey and data use have obtained the informed consent of all participants. The research program of this was reviewed and approved by the ethical committee of Shandong University (No. 20180225). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pang, M., Wang, J., Tian, T. et al. The mediating effect of social support on the association between socioeconomic status and self-reported oral health status among the migrant elderly following children in Weifang, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 22, 619 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02649-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02649-6

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us