Skip to main content
Download PDF

Efficacy of tooth brushing via a three-dimensional motion tracking system for dental plaque control in school children: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BMC Oral Health volume 22, Article number: 626 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

School children are in a developmental period in which permanent teeth replace primary dentition. It is also a period with a high incidence of gingivitis and caries, which can be improved with adequate tooth brushing. Advances in information technology have led to the development of smart health devices that assist in tooth brushing. We compared the effectiveness of computer-assisted toothbrushing using a toothbrushing instruction (TBI) method called the smart toothbrush and smart mirror (STM) system with that of conventional TBI (verbal instructions) for plaque control in school children.

Methods

This randomized controlled clinical trial analyzed and compared the reduction of the modified Quigley-Hein plaque index between the two methods in 42 school children. The participants were randomly assigned to the STM system group (n = 21) or conventional-TBI group (n = 21). The plaque indices were evaluated at baseline, immediately after TBI (day 0), and 1 week and 1 month after TBI.

Results

The STM system and conventional TBI led to an average reduction of 40.50% and 40.57%, respectively, in whole mouth plaque. Reductions in the plaque indices within each tested time period were observed in both groups (P < 0.001), and the mean plaque reduction did not differ between the two groups (P = 0.44).

Conclusions

The present study tested a computer assisted system for TBI, more studies are needed to confirm its usefulness in different objectives.

Clinical relevance The computer-assisted STM system may be an alternative of TBI for children.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04627324) Registered 13/11/2020—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04627324.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

According to the World Health Organization, oral diseases have a lifelong impact due to pain, discomfort, disfigurement, or even death in some cases [1]. Dental plaque is a biofilm or mass of bacteria that grows on intraoral surfaces. Cariogenic diet and failure to control dental plaque results in dental caries and periodontal diseases [2, 3], which are common worldwide [4,5,6,7]. Tooth brushing is a safe and efficacious technique for removal and prevention of dental plaque [8, 9].

During school-age years, new permanent teeth erupt, which are very rugged with deep pits [10, 11]. Given their shape, the teeth are vulnerable to caries. Tooth brushing during this time is difficult due to the presence of shaky and newly erupting teeth, both of which increase the risk for gingivitis [12, 13].

Parents’ management of their child’s tooth brushing and the child’s cooperation in the process are particularly important during this period [14,15,16,17]. However, parents may not be aware of the adequate tooth brushing technique and may not be able to visit the dentist to learn about this technique. Furthermore, even if they do know the correct technique, it is difficult for parents to supervise their child every time they brush their teeth [18]. In a study of Luciane et al., the importance of regular instruction for children was emphasized [19].

In recent years, advances in information technology (IT) have motivated the development of many smart health devices that enable more effective health management. Studies on the development of three-dimensional (3D) artificial joints and IT-based disease monitoring in patients with stroke and heart failure are underway [20,21,22]. In dentistry, electronic sonic toothbrushes and oscillating/pulsating toothbrushes, as well as devices that assist in tooth brushing, such as those that record tooth brushing time, have been developed [23,24,25,26]. Nevertheless, these devices do not evaluate whether the users are brushing their teeth properly and do not teach the users how to brush their teeth. The smart toothbrush and smart mirror (STM) system (XiuSolution, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) is one such smart health device that contains a 3D accelerometer and a magnetic sensor, and gives feedback on positioning and efficiency during toothbrushing [27,28,29,30].

The aim of this research was to compare the efficacy of a computer-assisted tooth brushing instruction (TBI) method, the STM system, with that of conventional TBI for plaque control in school children. Our hypothesis was that the efficacy of the STM system would be comparable with that of conventional TBI.

Materials and methods

Trial design

This was a parallel randomized control trial in which participants were assigned to either TBI with the STM system or the control group received conventional TBI (i.e., verbal instructions). The tooth brushing effect was evaluated at baseline, immediately after TBI (day 0), and 1 week and 1 month after TBI with the plaque indices. The trial was organized in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines.

Participants

This study was part of a larger study that also included adult participants, the data for which have been published [27]. Both studies were approved by the institutional review board of the Yonsei University dental hospital on the same protocol (IRB Number: 2-2008-0005). This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 04627324). The researcher posted recruitment posters at the Yonsei University Dental Hospital, and two public health centers in Gangseo-gu and Mapo-gu. In the poster, the following contents were included: the purpose of the study, number of visits, the required time for every visit, the inclusion (including age: 6–12 years) and the exclusion criteria, place of experiment, contact number. The participants were recruited in one of the following three institutes: the Yonsei University Dental Hospital (n = 15) and two public health centers in Gangseo-gu and Mapo-gu (n = 40). All the three institutes were located close to the participants’ residence; i.e., a 20-min walk from the residence to the institutes. The participants and their parents or guardians were provided verbal and written information about the products and purpose of the study, and written consent was obtained from the parents or guardians of the children during the first visit.

Participants were required to have at least one of the following symptoms of gingivitis, swollen gums, bright red or purple gums, gums that are tender or painful to the touch, gums that bleed easily when you brush or floss. And a baseline plaque scores > 1.5 (the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein index) [31, 32] was also required. Participants were excluded if they had rampant caries [33] or orthodontic appliances, or were immunocompromised (such as systemic diseases, any adverse medical history, or long-term medication use).

Tooth brushing Instruction System

The STM system comprises a smart mirror, which is integrated into a computer monitor, and a 3D motion-capture device inside of a modified toothbrush holder. The computer program displays a toothbrushing animation in the mirror. Toothbrush motions detected by sensors embedded inside the holder are captured and sent to the server for analysis (Fig. 1). The toothbrush motions are seen on this website. The video at the following link demonstrates the toothbrush motions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cvoy4deM-VQ.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of smart toothbrush and smart mirror (STM) system

Full size image

The STM system determines the tooth brushing pattern and provides real-time voice feedback such as “Good,” “Very Good,” and “Oops.” The level of TBI can be adjusted according to the user’s tooth brushing ability. Brushing areas are divided into 16 zones (anterior facial and lingual [palatal], right and left posterior occlusal, buccal, and lingual [palatal] for maxillary and mandibular teeth) (Fig. 1), and the duration of toothbrushing for each area can be set. The user can also select the method of brushing, from rolling, modified bass, or circle (Fones method). The color of the tooth in the mirror gradually changes to white according to the toothbrushing compliance and suitability. On completion, the STM system shows a summary report. In this study, we opted to use the rolling method as recommended by the Korean Dental Association, and the brushing duration of each area was set to 10 s.

Interventions

Participants were assigned to either TBI with the STM system or the control group received conventional TBI. Both were provided with the same fluoride-containing toothpaste (2080, Aekyung, Korea) and toothbrushes with a flat-trimmed nylon bristle of identical type and length. Both TBIs were formulated by one dental hygienist. Participants had to brush their teeth at home or school for three minutes, three times daily, and after meals, as recommended by the Korean Dental Association.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was an at least 15% reduction in terms of Q-H plaque index in teeth cleaning effective before and after education, which could be regard as a significant plaque reduction by the American Dental Association (ADA) guideline [34]. Secondary outcome was statistical changes between two groups regarding Q-H plaque index, in terms of whole mouth, buccal and lingual surface, the buccal surface of the maxillary first molars, respectively.

Plaque scoring

Participants first swished with a disclosing solution (2-Tone Disclosing Agent, Young Dental) for one minute. The Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein index was assessed by visual inspection after mouth gargling and confirmed with photography. Plaque examination was scored on the buccal and lingual surface of all the teeth (if a permanent tooth had not erupted yet, the primary tooth in the corresponding area was tested). The Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein index was scored between 0 and 5 (0: no plaque; 1: separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin of the tooth; 2: a thin continuous band of plaque at the cervical margin of the tooth ≤ 1 mm; 3: plaque covering up to one-third of the tooth crown; 4: plaque covering between one-third and two-thirds of the tooth crown; and 5: plaque covering ≥ two-thirds of the tooth crown).

The percentage reduction in plaque scores for the buccal surface, lingual surface, and whole mouth was determined as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} & {\text{Percentage reduction in plaque score}} \\ & \quad = \frac{{{\text{prebrushing}}\left( {{\text{baseline}}} \right){\text{ plaque score }} - {\text{ postbrushing plaque score}}}}{{{\text{prebrushing}}\left( {{\text{baseline}}} \right){\text{plaque score}}}} \\ \end{aligned}$$

The examiner was trained and calibrated, exhibiting an intra-rater reliability kappa of 0.81 for the plaque index (Landis and Koch kappa-test, p < 0.001).

Data collection

Participants visited the institutes three times. During the initial visit, participants underwent plaque examination and were then instructed using the STM system (used only during the appointment) or conventional TBI, according to their assigned group, followed by a re-evaluation of the plaque index. Subsequent visits were made at approximately 1 week (6–8 days) and 1 month (28–32 days) after the first visit to examine the maintenance and effectiveness of the TBI. All participants brushed their teeth at home and did not eat or drink before the plaque index was checked. Forty-two participants completed every visit.

Sample size

Sample size calculation was based on the mean values and standard deviations [SD] of overall plaque scores provided by Kim et al., 2015 [27]. A sample size of 21 participants was required per group to ensure a power of 90% (with two-sided α = 0.05) or a greater chance of detecting differences of 3.07% plaque reduction between the two groups, assuming 15.94% SD and 10% dropouts after randomization.

Randomization and blinding

Participants were randomly assigned into two equal-sized groups by flipping a coin. The experimental group received TBI with the STM system, while the control group received conventional TBI (i.e., verbal instructions). Another dental hygienist who was blinded to the group assignment determined the plaque status twice during the first visit and once during each subsequent visit.

Statistical methods

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS (version 25, IBM Corp). The balance evaluation for the metric variables were analyzed by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Linear mixed model (LMM) was used for repeated measure the data that fit the balance, and Mann–Whitney U test was performed for data that did not fit the balance, and all data were assessed the change over time (baseline, after instruction [day 0], and 1 week and 1 month later).

A 15% statistically significant plaque reduction is needed to provide evidence of greater effectiveness in teeth cleaning [34]. Data are presented as mean (SD) unless otherwise indicated, and the alpha level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

The flow of participants is shown in Fig. 2. Of the 55 Korean children who were assessed, 10 participants did not meet the baselines scores. Therefore, 45 participants were finally recruited in the study, of which 42 completed the protocol and three dropped out for reasons unrelated to the study. Forty-two participants (female 21, male 21; mean age and SD (9.64 and 1.96 years), [range, 6–12 years]) completed the study. The minimum and maximum number of teeth were 12 and 28, respectively (mean 21.93, SD 4.06). Most participants were right-handed (93%) (Table 1).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Study CONSORT diagram

Full size image
Table 1 Patient demographics (N = 42)
Full size table

Primary outcome variable

The mean whole mouth prebrushing plaque scores for the STM system and conventional TBI groups were 3.31 and 3.21, respectively, and all participants exhibited gingivitis with different status. Whole mouth changes in the plaque index are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Plaque indices and plaque reduction percentages for the whole mouth
Full size table

A linear mixed model revealed a significant effect of time (p < 0.001). The whole mouth plaque index decreased from 3.31 at baseline to 1.88 one month after TBI for the STM system group, and from 3.21 to 1.72 for the same time period for the conventional TBI group. The mean percentage plaque score reductions for the STM system group and conventional TBI group over the entire study period were 40.5% and 40.57%, respectively. The mean percentage plaque score reductions for the STM system group and the conventional TBI group were 46.69% and 43.83%, respectively, for the buccal surfaces, and 31.05% and 33.89%, respectively, for the lingual surfaces (Table 3).

Table 3 Plaque indices and plaque reduction percentages for the buccal and lingual surfaces
Full size table

Secondary outcome variables

No effect of group (p = 0.44) (time X group) with respect to whole mouth plaque indices. There were no statistically significant differences in the effects of plaque removal on either the buccal or lingual sides between the two groups (p = 0.78 and p = 0.25, respectively).

A sub-analysis of the buccal surface of the maxillary first molars revealed that although the STM system group tended to show a greater plaque index reduction than the conventional TBI group immediately and 1 month after TBI, these differences failed to reach statistical significance (Table. 4).

Table 4 Plaque indices and plaque reduction percentages for buccal surface of the maxillary first molars
Full size table

Adverse events

No participant reported any equipment-related physical harm.

Discussion

Principal results

The effects of computer-assisted TBI and conventional TBI on dental plaque in school children were evaluated in this study. The STM system and conventional TBI led to an average reduction of 40.50% and 40.57%, respectively, in whole mouth plaque. Both were, therefore, effective for teaching children how to brush their teeth. While the plaque index differed significantly across time points for both systems (p < 0.001), there was no significant difference in the plaque index between the two groups (p = 0.44).

Both groups showed greater plaque improvement in the buccal than in the lingual region. However, the greater effect on the lingual side in the control group at 1 month was possibly influenced by the Pygmalion effect. We surmise that the participants who had not brushed well on the lingual side at 1 week paid more attention to brushing this side in the ensuing weeks in anticipation of the 1-month evaluation.

For the buccal surface of the maxillary first molars, which is an area often neglected during tooth brushing by children [35], the STM system was actually more effective than the conventional TBI. This suggests that the system increases the effectiveness of tooth brushing on surfaces that are difficult to clean.

Comparison with previous work

Manual toothbrushes are useful for the mechanical removal of dental plaque, which is known to be the primary cause of caries and periodontal disease [36]. However, effective toothbrushing is a learned skill that requires practice and professional TBI. Previous studies regarding the dissemination of TBI via mass media programs, posters, plays, or videos reported unsatisfactory results due to insufficient repetition and reinforcement [37,38,39].

In this study, the STM system, which is capable of detecting 3D motion (motion measured at each tooth position and at each area being brushed with real-time feedback and correction of toothbrushing technique), was examined as an alternative method for TBI that treats brushing like a game. In fact, while children are commonly not good at brushing, when they learn it as if it were a game, they actually become proficient at it [40, 41].

Although similar systems have been tested in several other studies, the experimental procedures were performed in either a clinical environment or examined adults [23, 27, 29]. Toothbrushing habits are established early in childhood, and children tend to have high levels of plaque, indicating that this is a particularly important period to target with effective TBI [42]. This was the motivation for using children in this study.

Our study results are consistent with those of Kim et al. [27] who found a 39.88% reduction in the plaque index using a similar system. Other methods have included leaflet-based and videotape-based TBI, which showed plaque reduction rates of 58% and 37%, respectively [43]. The discrepancy in plaque reduction rates in different studies may be due to differences in the baseline plaque index between the participants or differences in the plaque index systems used to evaluate oral cleanliness.

There are several recent studies on the use of power toothbrushes for dental plaque removal [44, 45]. Both power and manual toothbrushes are effective in plaque removal [46, 47]. The STM system is a manual toothbrush connected to a computerized handle for dental plaque removal. The computerized handle does not vibrate automatically, but only detects movement and gives feedback on positioning and efficiency during toothbrushing. The STM system can clean all parts of the teeth evenly in an appropriate amount of time. Additionally, it allows users to select the method of tooth brushing (modified bass, rolling, and the circle method) according to their oral health. This system is designed as a fun and easy tool to teach school children how to brush their teeth in lieu of busy medical staff in dental hospitals or parents at home.

Diverse studies utilizing telemedicine have recently been published. Particularly, the advances in mobile devices have led to more active research on the use of mobile devices for patients with cancer and heart disease [48, 49]. The manufacturer of the STM system has developed a mobile application, and it would be advisable to conduct further studies based on this mobile application.

Limitations

The reported positive effects of the computer-assisted TBI on the improvement of tooth brushing skills and dental plaque control must be considered in light of several limitations. First, this was a short-term study, and the participants used the STM system only during the test visits. More accurate results would have been obtained if the participants had continued to use the system at home as well. Second, further studies may be required to assess the correlation between the summary scores and the degree of dental plaque control achieved. Lastly, the present study failed to collect the data on SES and patent education, as well as on caries rate/DMFS. The future study should mend the limitations above mentioned.

Conclusion

TBI is highly important for maintaining oral hygiene and preventing caries and other dental diseases in children. The STM system exhibited efficacy in plaque control and may be a potential alternative for conventional TBI.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

IT:

Information technology

STM system:

Smart toothbrush and smart mirror system

TBI:

Toothbrushing instruction

3D:

Three-dimensional

References

  1. World Health Organization 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/oral-health. Accessed 16 July 2022.

  2. Seneviratne CJ, Zhang CF, Samaranayake LP. Dental plaque biofilm in oral health and disease. Chin J Dent Res. 2011;14(2):87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amezdroz E, Carpenter L, Johnson S, Flood V, et al. Feasibility and development of a cariogenic diet scale for epidemiological research. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019;29(3):310–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kassebaum NJ, Smith AGC, Bernabé E, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence, incidence, and disability-adjusted life years for oral conditions for 195 countries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. J Dent Res. 2017;96(4):380–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bagramian RA, Garcia-Godoy F, Volpe AR. The global increase in dental caries. A pending public health crisis. Am J Dent. 2009;22(1):3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Petersen PE, Ogawa H. The global burden of periodontal disease: towards integration with chronic disease prevention and control. Periodontol 2000. 2012;60(1):15–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. AlShaya MS, Assery MK, Pani SC. Reliability of mobile phone teledentistry in dental diagnosis and treatment planning in mixed dentition. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;26(1–2):45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar S, Tadakamadla J, Johnson NW. Effect of toothbrushing frequency on incidence and increment of dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016;95(11):1230–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chapple IL, Van der Weijden F, Doerfer C, et al. Primary prevention of periodontitis: managing gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(16):S71–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Holmgren CJ, Lo EC, Hu D. Glass ionomer ART sealants in Chinese school children-6-year results. J Dent. 2013;41(9):764–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li SH, Kingman A, Forthofer R, et al. Comparison of tooth surface-specific dental caries attack patterns in US schoolchildren from two national surveys. J Dent Res. 1993;72(10):1398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nourallah AW, Splieth CH. Efficacy of occlusal plaque removal in erupting molars: a comparison of an electric toothbrush and the cross-toothbrushing technique. Caries Res. 2004;38(2):91–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ainamo J, Ainamo A. Prevention of periodontal disease in the mixed dentition. Int Dent J. 1981;31(2):125–32.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huebner CE, Riedy CA. Behavioral determinants of brushing young children’s teeth: implications for anticipatory guidance. Pediatr Dent. 2010;32(1):48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Khadri FA, Gopinath VK, Hector MP, et al. How pre-school children learn to brush their teeth in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010;20(3):230–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garbin C, Garbin A, Dos Santos K, et al. Oral health education in schools: promoting health agents. Int J Dent Hyg. 2009;7(3):212–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hsieh HJ, Huang ST, Tsai CC, et al. Toothbrushing habits and risk indicators of severe early childhood caries among aboriginal Taiwanese. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2014;26(3):238–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Naidu RS, Nunn JH. Oral health knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of parents and caregivers of preschool children: implications for oral health promotion. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020;18(1):245–52.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zanin L, Meneghim MC, Assaf AV, Cortellazzi KL, et al. Evaluation of an educational program for children with high risk of caries. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007;31(4):246–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gebruers N, Vanroy C, Truijen S, et al. Monitoring of physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of accelerometry-based measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(2):288–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hernigou P, Olejnik R, Safar A, et al. Digital twins, artificial intelligence, and machine learning technology to identify a real personalized motion axis of the tibiotalar joint for robotics in total ankle arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2021;45(9):2209–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jehn M, Schmidt-Trucksäess A, Schuster T, et al. Accelerometer-based quantification of 6-minute walk test performance in patients with chronic heart failure: applicability in telemedicine. J Card Fail. 2009;15(4):334–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Graetz C, Bielfeldt J, Wolff L, et al. Toothbrushing education via a smart software visualization system. J Periodontol. 2013;84(2):186–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McCracken G, Janssen J, Heasman L, et al. Assessing adherence with toothbrushing instructions using a data logger toothbrush. Br Dent J. 2005;198(1):29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Robinson PG, Deacon SA, Deery C, et al. Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;18(2):CD002281.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yaacob M, Worthington HV, Deacon SA, et al. Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(6):CD002281.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kim KD, Jeong JS, Lee HN, et al. Efficacy of computer-assisted, 3D motion-capture toothbrushing instruction. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(6):1389–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee JW, Lee KH, Kim KS, et al. Development of smart toothbrush monitoring system for ubiquitous healthcare. In: International conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society; 2006. p. 6422–5.

  29. Kim KS, Yoon TH, Lee JW, et al. Interactive toothbrushing education by a smart toothbrush system via 3D visualization. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2009;96(2):125–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee YJ, Lee PJ, Kim KS, et al. Toothbrushing region detection using three-axis accelerometer and magnetic sensor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59(3):872–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Quigley GA, Hein JW. Comparative cleansing efficiency of manual and power brushing. J Am Dent Assoc. 1962;65:26–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I. Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. J Periodontol. 1970;41(1):41–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Guzmán-Armstrong S. Rampant caries. J Sch Nurs. 2005;21(5):272–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. American Dental Association. Council on scientific affairs. Acceptance program guidelines—toothbrushes. Niagara Falls: American Dental Association; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Prasad KV, Sreenivasan PK, Patil S, et al. Removal of dental plaque from different regions of the mouth after a 1-minute episode of mechanical oral hygiene. Am J Dent. 2011;24(1):60–4.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Claydon NC. Current concepts in toothbrushing and interdental cleaning. Periodontol. 2000;2008(48):10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kay E, Locker D. A systematic review of the effectiveness of health promotion aimed at improving oral health. Community Dent Health. 1998;15(3):132–44.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tolvanen M, Lahti S, Poutanen R, et al. Changes in children’s oral health-related behavior, knowledge and attitudes during a 3.4-yr randomized clinical trial and oral health-promotion program. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117:390–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Habbu SG, Krishnappa P. Effectiveness of oral health education in children: a systematic review of current evidence (2005–2011). Int Dent J. 2015;65(2):57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rodrigues JA, dos Santos PA, Garcia PP, et al. Evaluation of motivation methods used to obtain appropriate oral hygiene levels in schoolchildren. Int J Dent Hyg. 2003;1(4):227–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Amantini SNSR, Montilha AAP, Antonelli BC, et al. Using augmented reality to motivate oral hygiene practice in children: protocol for the development of a serious game. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020;9(1):e10987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. World Health Organization. Oral health promotion through schools. WHO Information series on school health document eleven. 2003. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70207/1/WHO_NMH_NPH_ORH_School_03.3_eng.pdf/iris/handle/10665/70207. Accessed 16 July 2022.

  43. Yazdani R, Vehkalahti MM, Nouri M, et al. School-based education to improve oral cleanliness and gingival health in adolescents in Tehran. Iran Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009;19(4):274–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Starke M, Delaurenti M, Ward M, et al. A comparison of the effect of two power toothbrushes on the gingival health and plaque status of subjects with moderate gingivitis. J Clin Dent. 2017;28(1 Spec No A):A29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lv J, Guo B, Ling J. A 6-month clinical evaluation of a high frequency sonic toothbrush in comparison with an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush and a traditional sonic toothbrush in reducing gingivitis and plaque. Am J Dent. 2018;31(4):171–6.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dörfer CE, Staehle HJ, Wolff D. Three-year randomized study of manual and power toothbrush effects on pre-existing gingival recession. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(6):512–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sälzer S, Graetz C, Plaumann A, et al. Effect of a multidirectional power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush in individuals susceptible to gingival recession: a 12-month randomized controlled clinical study. J Periodontol. 2016;87(5):548–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McCann L, Maguire R, Miller M, et al. Patients’ perceptions and experiences of using a mobile phone-based advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) to monitor and manage chemotherapy related toxicity. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2009;18(2):156–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Walters DL, Sarela A, Fairfull A, et al. A mobile phone-based care model for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: the care assessment platform (CAP). BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2010;28(10):5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was part of the author’s doctoral dissertation. We thank XiuSolution for technical support.

Funding

This work was supported by the Mid-career Researcher Program through an NRF grant funded by the MEST (No. 2010–0027674) and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (NRF-2013R1A1A1009513).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China

    Jin-Sun Jeong

  2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Science and Technology, Konkuk University, Chungju, Korea

    Kyeong-Seop Kim & Jeong-Whan Lee

  3. Department of Advanced General Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea

    Kee-Deog Kim & Wonse Park

Authors
  1. Jin-Sun Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kyeong-Seop Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeong-Whan Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kee-Deog Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wonse Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by J-SJ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by J-SJ and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kee-Deog Kim or Wonse Park.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei Dental Hospital (IRB No. 2-2008-0005) and was registered under the protocol ID NCT04627324 on November 13, 2020. This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The informed and also written consents were obtained from the parent of each participating child.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no potentially conflict of interest related to the article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeong, JS., Kim, KS., Lee, JW. et al. Efficacy of tooth brushing via a three-dimensional motion tracking system for dental plaque control in school children: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 22, 626 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02665-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02665-6

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us