Skip to main content
Download PDF

MRONJ in breast cancer patients under bone modifying agents for cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL): a multi-hospital-based case series

BMC Oral Health volume 23, Article number: 71 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) is the most common adverse event experienced by patients affected by breast cancer (BC) patients, without bone metastases. Bone modifying agents (BMAs) therapy is prescribed for the prevention of CTIBL, but it exposes patients to the risk of MRONJ.

Methods

This multicentre hospital-based retrospective study included consecutive non-metastatic BC patients affected by MRONJ related to exposure to low-dose BMAs for CTIBL prevention. Patients’ data were retrospectively collected from the clinical charts of seven recruiting Italian centres.

Results

MRONJ lesions were found in fifteen females (mean age 67.5 years), mainly in the mandible (73.3%). The mean duration of BMAs therapy at MRONJ presentation was 34.9 months. The more frequent BMAs was denosumab (53.3%). Ten patients (66.7%) showed the following local risk factors associated to MRONJ development: periodontal disease (PD) in three cases (20%) and the remaining six (40%) have undergone PD-related tooth extractions. One patient presented an implant presence-triggered MRONJ (6.7%). In five patients (33.3%) no local risk factors were observed.

Conclusions

This is the first case series that investigated BC patients under BMAs for CTIBL prevention suffering from MRONJ. These patients seem to have similar probabilities of developing MRONJ as osteo-metabolic ones. Breast cancer patients under BMAs for CTIBL prevention need a regular prevention program for MRONJ, since they may develop bone metastases and be treated with higher doses of BMAs, potentially leading to a high-risk of MRONJ.

Peer Review reports

Background

Medication-related osteonecrosis of Jaw (MRONJ) is defined as an “an adverse drug reaction described as the progressive destruction and death of bone that affects the mandible and maxilla of patients exposed to the treatment with medications known to increase the risk of disease, in the absence of a previous radiation treatment” [1].

MRONJ is considered a potentially serious complication of bone modifying agents (BMAs), such as bisphosphonates (BPs) and denosumab (DNB) [2, 3]. Furthermore, several MRONJ cases have been described in cancer patients following treatment with other biological medications that have no antiresorptive activity on bone tissue (e.g. tyrosine kinase inhibitors), with or without concurrent BMAs [4, 5].

MRONJ is usually reported in two major groups of patients: (a) cancer patients with bone metastases (BM) or with multiple myeloma, usually receiving high doses of BMAs, and (b) osteo-metabolic patients under low doses of BMAs [2, 6,7,8]. The risk of MRONJ is considerably higher in the malignancy group, ranging between 1% and more than 20%, than in the osteo-metabolic group, less than 1% [9,10,11,12].

However, among patients at risk of MRONJ, recent data included another emerging group of patients affected by breast cancer or prostate cancer, without BM and under hormonal therapy, with peculiar clinical features. They are receiving low-doses of BMAs, at the same dosage of the osteo-metabolic patients, to prevent or to treat Cancer Treatment-Induced Bone Loss (CTIBL) [13, 14]. These patients should be considered assumable to those with osteoporosis for what concerns their MRONJ risk.

In particular, breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer worldwide [15, 16]. There were 2,3 million women diagnosed with BC and 685,000 deaths globally in 2020. BC has a prevalence estimated in 2020 (time period 5 years) of 7,8 million women [14, 15]. About 70–80% of early BC patients receive adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). In the majority of cases, ET includes the use of aromatase inhibitors, as an upfront or switch strategy, that has well-known effect on bone demineralization [17, 18].

In patients affected by BC, since gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues or chemotherapy and/or aromatase inhibitors reduce estrogen levels inducing early menopause, there is the risk of developing CTIBL, regardless of the risk of developing BM in advanced stages of BC [17, 18].

CTIBL is considered the most common long-term adverse event experienced by patients affected by BC receiving adjuvant ET. The BMAs are the leading therapy for the prevention and treatment of CTIBL, which is administered at the same low-dosage of osteoporotic patients, rather than that used in bone metastatic cancer and multiple myeloma patients [17, 19, 20].

In randomized controlled trials (RCT) on BC patients treated with BMAs for CTIBL prevention (mostly under zoledronic acid 4 mg IV every 6 months, or denosumab 60 mg s.c. every 6 months), the prevalence of MRONJ onset was 0–0.5%, although, at present, data are scarce and debatable [10, 21, 22]. The results of the comparisons between different molecules and drug regimens, showed an incidence of MRONJ ranging from 0.3% (in patients under daily oral clodronate) to 5.4% (under denosumab 120 mg s.c. every 4–12 weeks) [23,24,25].

The aim of this study was to describe the features of a series of BC females without bone metastases and affected by MRONJ under low doses of BMAs for CTIBL prevention.

Methods

Study design

This multicentre hospital-based retrospective study included consecutive non-metastatic BC patients affected by MRONJ related to the exposure to low-dose BMAs for CTIBL prevention. Patients’ data were retrospectively collected from the clinical charts of seven recruiting Italian centres (2 in the north and 5 in the south of Italy) between January 2016 and July 2022. In detail, these are the centres involved: Unit of Oral Medicine, “Paolo Giaccone” Policlinico University Hospital of Palermo (Italy); Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Padua (Italy); Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, “Magna Græcia” University of Catanzaro (Italy); Unit of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa (Italy); Unit of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of Catania (Italy); Unit of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Messina (Italy); Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Clinica del Mediterraneo di Ragusa (Italy).

The study was conducted according to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards, and it was approved by the central institutional review board (Coordinator Centre approval ID: #4/2012—“Paolo Giaccone” Policlinico University Hospital in Palermo, Italy). The study was conducted following the STROBE Statement for Observational Cohort Studies [26].

Eligibility criteria

All BC patients scheduled to receive BMAs therapy or already exposed to BMAs for CTIBL with a suspicious or confirmed diagnosis of MRONJ, were consecutively enrolled at each participating centres from January 2016 to July 2022.

The inclusion criteria in the study cohort were the following:

  • age ≥ 18 years;

  • women affected by BC and treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy;

  • previous or current treatment with low-dose BMAs for CTIBL prevention;

  • MRONJ diagnosis according to SICMF-SIPMO clinical-radiological staging system (assessment of MRONJ radiological signs by means of computed tomography (CT) or cone beam CT (CBCT)) [6].

The exclusion criteria were:

  • history of high-dose BMAs for bone metastases;

  • concurrent use of anti-angiogenic agents or other drugs at risk of MRONJ onset;

  • exposure to radiant therapy of the head-neck;

  • suspicious or confirmed diagnosis of primary or secondary jaw cancer.

MRONJ case adjudication at the seven participating centres was performed by oral health and oral surgery specialists. Each report was supported by a qualitative case-by-case assessment procedure, which was conducted by an officially recognized drug expert, with the delivery of an adverse drug reaction report.

Study variables

The following data were recorded in all recruited cases: demographic data; drug-related (i.e. type, dose and formulation of BMAs); clinical variables associated with MRONJ-risk (e.g. smoking habits, comorbidities such as diabetes, concomitant corticosteroids treatment); oral trigger associated to MRONJ development; site of MRONJ; disease stage according to AAOMS clinical classification and according to SICMF-SIPMO clinical-radiological staging system [6, 12].

In all cases, MRONJ diagnosis was confirmed at presentation through the clinical inspection at of the main/minor oral signs and symptoms and the detection of the radiological signs (loss of medullary bone, increased bone density, bone sclerosis) at the CT/CBTC according to the SICMF-SIPMO classification system [3, 27]. Bone biopsies were not performed, since there was no doubt regarding the suspicion of malignancies in enrolled patients [3].

The data were entered into a standardized electronic case report form in all recruiting centre.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were reported as mean value and standard deviations, median, whereas categorical variables by the frequency distributions.

Results

A total of 15 women affected by BC under BMAs for CTIBL prevention were included.

The baseline features of the cases were reported in Table 1. The mean age was 67.5 ± 11 years (median 68 years). In eight patients (8/15, 53.3%), concomitant comorbidities were the following: hypertension (7/15, 46.7%), arthrosis (1/15, 6.7%), and diabetes mellitus (2/15, 13.3%). Five patients were under corticosteroid therapy (5/15, 33.3%). Only one patient was a smoker (1/15, 6.7%). In the remaining seven patients (7/15, 46.7%) no comorbidities or co-medication were recorded.

Table 1 Study population features
Full size table

Regarding the adjuvant ET, most of the patients (9/15, 60%) received aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane); two patients (2/15, 13.3%) received selective estrogen receptor modulator (tamoxifen). The remaining four patients (4/15, 26.7%) received a sequence of more agents or unspecified drugs.

Regarding BMA type, 8 patients received DNB (53.3%) (60 mg s.c. every 6 months), 4 patients used alendronate (26.7%) (70 mg os every week), 2 patients used clodronate (13.3%) (600 mg i.m., every month), and 1 patient used ibandronate (6.7%) (150 mg os monthly). The mean duration of BMA therapy at MRONJ presentation was 35.7 months (± 26.3 months, median 24 months). No patient was treated with BMAs prior to breast cancer diagnosis nor with BMAs for metastasis.

Ten patients (10/15, 66.7%) showed the following local risk factors for MRONJ development: periodontal disease (PD) in three cases (3/15, 20%), six (6/15, 40%) have undergone PD-related tooth extractions, and one patient presented an implant presence-triggered MRONJ (1/15, 6.7%). In five patients (5/15, 33.3%) no local risk factors were observed (Table 1).

The mandible was the most frequent affected site (11/15, 73.3% versus 4/15, 26.7% of MRONJ of the upper jaw) (Fig. 1). According to the AAOMS staging system [12], MRONJ cases were classified as it follows: 6 patients were in stage 1 (40%), 5 patients in stage 2 (33.3%), and 4 patients in stage 3 (26.7%). While, according to SICMF-SIPMO staging system [6], the stage distribution of MRONJ was: 4 cases of stage 1 (26.7%), 7 in stage 2 (46.7%), and 4 in stage 3 (26.7%)(Table 2).

Table 2 Details of patients affected by breast cancer under bone modifying agents for CTIBL
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

MRONJ stage 1 SICMF-SIPMO, lower jaw: a clinical view; b–f CBCT scan sections

Full size image

The most frequent symptoms and signs at presentation were pain (10/15, 66.7%), followed by bone exposure (9/15, 60%) and soft tissue inflammation and suppuration (9/15, 60% and 8/15, 53.3%, respectively).

Discussion

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) occurs more frequently in patients receiving high doses of bisphosphonates or denosumab (RANKL-inhibitor) for metastatic cancer.

At present, a growing number of observations on MRONJ cases are emerging in patients exposed to low-dose BMAs for osteoporosis [28].

Low-dose BMA have been recently recommended for the prevention and treatment of cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) in patients with solid tumor (breast or prostate cancer) without bone metastases.

In this scenario, these patients are considered an emerging category at risk of MRONJ development, sharing simultaneously common features of both cancer patients and osteo-metabolic patients.

The present study investigates for the first time the features at presentation and risk factors associated to MRONJ development in a series of breast cancer (BC) patients exposed to BMAs therapy for CTIBL prevention.

Cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) has been found to be the most common long-term adverse event experienced by patients affected by BC with a peak of incidence in postmenopausal age [13].

Fifteen cases of MRONJ in patients affected by BC, without BM, under a low dose of BMAs for CTIBL prevention were collected and described.

Adjuvant ET represents the standard of care in hormone receptor-positive BC patients, which represent about 75–80% of all BC diagnoses, as it was shown to significantly reduce the risk of recurrence and cancer-related death. Adjuvant ET consists of two main drug regimens: estrogen receptor modulators and aromatase inhibitors [13]. Women affected by BC treated with ET as mainly adjuvant therapy or in premature iatrogenic menopause represent a particular subtype of patients at high-risk of fracture, due to the onset of CTIBL. As described in different guidelines [17, 29], BPs and DNB are the two classes of BMAs used in clinical practice with similar efficacy in preventing CTIBL, and they are routinely prescribed with the same dosage used in osteo-metabolic patients (low-dose BMAs) [13].

In recents RCT on BC patients without BM under a low dose of BMAs for CTIBL prevention, the incidence of MRONJ was observed between 0% and 0.5 [10, 21, 22].

As well as BC, also prostate cancer places a high burden on patients and healthcare systems, recently affecting over 1.4 million men worldwide each year [14]. Most of advanced prostate cancer patients receive Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT). ADT causes a rapid disruption of bone remodelling balance, which leads to net bone loss. Bone loss, as well as disruption of bone microarchitecture, continues throughout the duration of ADT and ongoing CTIBL in men with prostate cancer is superimposed upon normal age-related bone loss [30]. Hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer patients (without or with bone metastases) should receive low-dose BMAs to prevent CTIBL, whereas patients with castration-resistant disease and bone metastases should receive high-dose zoledronic acid or denosumab, together with anticancer treatments [17]. An attempt to adopt high-doses of denosumab (120 mg every 4 weeks) in prostate cancer patients without metastases failed to reach approval, also due to a high rate (5%) of MRONJ [17, 31].

BC patients and prostate cancer patients, both under low doses of BMAs for CTIBL prevention, are hence an emerging category at risk of MRONJ, who share simultaneously some characteristics of both cancer patients and osteo-metabolic patients. Furthermore, intermediate doses of BMAs have been administered in patients enrolled in RCTs evaluating both the prognostic effect of BMAs as adjuvant treatment in non-metastatic breast cancer, and the risk-reduction of CTIBL development as secondary endpoint.

If considered data from literature, we can consider only findings from osteo-metabolic patients under low doses of BMAs and from the same geographical area: 87 cases of MRONJ were described (mean age of 70.7 ± 9.8 years, median 72); 42 patients (42/87, 48.3%) had various general health comorbidities (e.g. diabetes mellitus, hypertension); and in 33 cases (37.9%) oral triggers for MRONJ development were detected [7]. Regarding the BPs, 77/87 (88.5%) patients were treated with alendronate (a weekly dose of 70 mg orally); the mean duration of BMAs therapy at MRONJ presentation was 44.9 (± 35.5 months, median 38 months). Bone exposure was the main presenting sign (82.8%). MRONJ was classified according to AAOMS [12], as it follows: 15 patients in stage 0 (17.2%), 12 in stage 1 (13.8%), 53 in stage 2 (60.9%) and 7 in stage 3 (8.1%). Tooth extraction for dental/periodontal diseases, was the most common trigger factor for MRONJ (57/87 patients; 65.5%) [7].

In another Italian study, fifty-three female patients affected by osteoporosis were enrolled in the study (mean age of 71.9 ± 10.2 years). Twenty-two subjects (41.5%) had hypertension, seven (13.2%) had diabetes and five (9.4%) had rheumatoid arthritis. Eight subjects were smokers (15.1%). The majority of the sample (45 subjects, 84.9%) was treated with alendronic acid (70 mg/week). Most of the lesions were located in the mandible (74%); bone exposure was found in 40 subjects (75.4%). MRONJ was classified according to AAOMS [12], as it follows: 7 in stage 1 (13.2%), 39 in stage 2 (73.6%) and 7 in stage 3 (13.2%). Tooth extraction for dental/periodontal diseases, was the most common trigger factor for MRONJ 29/53 patients (54.7%) [32].

In a third Italian study, 36 patients receiving BPs for the treatment of osteoporosis were described. There were 32 females (88.8%), and the mean age of the patients was 72.8 (± 10.1). Cardiovascular disease was the most detected comorbidity (23/36; 63.9%), followed by anxiety and/or depression, diabetes and lipid disorders. The most commonly administered BPs was alendronate (n = 26; 72.2%). The most common location of MRONJ was the mandible (29/36; 80.6%). MRONJ was classified according to AAOMS [12], as it follows: 4 in stage 0 (11.1%); 18 in stage 1 (50%), 11 in stage 2 (30.6%) and 3 in stage 3 (8.3%). The presence of a potential oral trigger was recorded in 24 (66.7%), with the most common being dental extraction [33].

The patients under BMA therapy for CTIBL could show some assumed systemic risk factors for MRONJ similar to those of cancer patients with BM, such as chemotherapy or steroids intake, whereas at the same time the prevention of CTIBL is based on a low dose of BMAs, with the same therapeutic scheme of osteo-metabolic patients [2, 6, 8].

In this case series, regarding the local risk factors, PD and PD-related tooth extraction were both reported (15.38% and 38.46% of patients enrolled, respectively). On the basis of current literature, these two variables could be considered as a “unicum” trigger of the most frequent dental disease is PD, implying the disease and its extreme resolution [2, 8, 34]. In detail, tooth extraction has been described as one of the major risk factors for the onset of MRONJ; however, it is indicated only in the presence of endodontic and/or periodontal diseases, in patients at risk of MRONJ, when a conservative approach is not possible, and a good tooth prognosis is not guaranteed. Hence, dental infections are basically the main reason for dental extraction, and they are local risk factors already present for long periods before surgical procedures (e.g. severe periodontitis will be a determinant for a tooth with poor prognosis). Indeed, among local risk factors, the role of periodontal infections and the oral microbiome is becoming increasingly outstanding in MRONJ onset. These conditions are associated with inflammatory responses, that may directly or indirectly affect the alveolar bone and stimulate bone resorption, and so, under the effect of BMAs, the MRONJ onset [34,35,36,37]. Furthermore, there is increasing evidence that signs and symptoms of dental/periodontal infection are significantly associated with histological alveolar bone necrosis even prior to dental extractions and MRONJ development [34, 38].

Based on the literature and the present findings, it is our opinion that it is possible to distinguish at least three main common categories of patients at risk of MRONJ [3, 8, 13, 39, 40]:

  1. (a)

    cancer patients with BM or myeloma patients; generally receiving BMAs at high doses and more frequently (e.g. every four weeks), often associated with anticancer agents (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, immunotherapy, antiangiogenics, and other biological agents). This is a group at high-risk of MRONJ.

  2. (b)

    cancer patients (e.g. BC patients without bone metastases, and hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients, with or without bone metastases) at risk of non-metastatic bone fractures due to CTIBL; generally receiving BPs or DNB to reduce the CTIBL, and/or to improve prognosis (“adjuvant” treatment of prostate and breast cancer patients). In the absence of robust data, this population (if with the same dosage of BMAs) is considered assumable to that one with osteoporosis for what concerns their MRONJ risk and must not be confused with the category a);

  3. (c)

    patients suffering from osteoporosis and other non-malignant diseases, receiving BMAs low regimens. This is the group usually at the lowest MRONJ risk, unless the BMA treatment is prolonged.

All patients at risk of MRONJ should be subjected to primary preventive measures (even after commencing BMAs), with the aim to maintain and/or re-establish as soon as possible a sufficient level of oral health [3, 41, 42]. The preventive measures in cancer patients with BM or multiple myeloma should be done strictly before the administration of MRONJ-related medications, and in osteo-metabolic patients within its first six months. Furthermore, the patients taking BMAs should undergo periodic dental visits for early diagnosis of MRONJ: every four months for patients assuming a high dose of BMAs with/without antiangiogenics medication intake; every six months for patients assuming a low dose of BMAs [3, 9].

To date, data on MRONJ onset in BC patients and hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients under low doses of BMAs for CTIBL prevention are still scarce and uncertain. Moreover, no recommendations for MRONJ have been published dedicated to BC patients under low doses of BMAs for CTIBL prevention or treatment. Apparently, they could be assimilated, with regard to MRONJ prevention workflows, to osteo-metabolic patients.

Another point of attention is that for BC females it should be taken into account also that they could previously have received BMAs at low doses before CTIBL prevention, to treat or prevent primary osteoporosis, increasing their BPs cumulative dose or BMAs time of assumption.

Noteworthy, it is important to remember that BC patients may develop bone metastases along their clinical history [43]. The risk of MRONJ onset in these patients will most likely increase drastically over time due to the development of BM that requires BMAs at high doses. Consequently, BC patients already treated with low doses BMAs (due to CTIBL) could be later treated with high doses of BMAs in combination or not with anti-angiogenic medication after developing BM. Furthermore, the previous prolonged BMA treatment could lead to a high-risk of MRONJ in a potentially short time after the start of high dose BMA therapy.

From a practical point of view, if a given cancer patient under CTIBL develops BM, before the assumption of high dose BMAs, the oral condition must be re-evaluated by dental examination and, when necessary, also thanks to a new radiological dental exam. Additionally, cancer patients that develop BM will be included in a follow-up program every 4 months, instead of every 6 months. It would be helpful to perform together with dental examination professional oral hygiene [3, 41, 42].

A drawback of this study might be the retrospective set-up of the study design; however, all the centres involved have done their best to collect long-term data (over 6 years) from heterogeneous groups of patients at risk of MRONJ. Furthermore, other limitations of the present study are the small sample size, and the lack of data on endodontic diseases.

Conclusion

In our opinion, BC patients under low doses of BMAs for CTIBL prevention should be considered assumable to those with osteoporosis for what concerns their MRONJ risk; however, there is a lack of reliable data on the incidence and prevalence of MRONJ in the study group.

In conclusion, BC patients receiving therapy for CTIBL is an emerging category of MRONJ risk, still poorly known by many clinicians, especially dentists. This scarce knowledge may lead to the possibility of overestimating the risk of MRONJ onset in these patients if included in the same cohorts of cancer patients with BM or multiple myeloma, and of putting in place excessive or overly stringent MRONJ preventive measures. On the other hand, there is the risk that other clinicians underestimate the need to upgrade the preventive protocol for MRONJ when high doses BMAs for bone metastases must be commenced.

Based on our findings, BC patients under BMAs for CTIBL prevention need a regular prevention program for MRONJ since they may later develop bone metastases and be switched from low to high dose BMAs, potentially leading in a short time to a high-risk of MRONJ.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Bedogni A, Campisi G, Fusco V. Medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). London: Qeios; 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Schiodt M, Otto S, Fedele S, Bedogni A, Nicolatou-Galitis O, Guggenberger R, et al. Workshop of european task force on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw—current challenges. Oral Dis. 2019;25:1815–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Campisi G, Mauceri R, Bertoldo F, Bettini G, Biasotto M, Colella G, et al. Medication-related osteonecrosis of jaws (MRONJ) prevention and diagnosis: Italian consensus update 2020. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nicolatou-Galitis O, Kouri M, Papadopoulou E, Vardas E, Galiti D, Epstein JB, et al. Osteonecrosis of the jaw related to non-antiresorptive medications: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27:383–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fusco V, Santini D, Armento G, Tonini G, Campisi G. Osteonecrosis of jaw beyond antiresorptive (bone-targeted) agents: new horizons in oncology. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15:925–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Campisi G, Fedele S, Fusco V, Pizzo G, Di Fede O, Bedogni A. Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, risk reduction and treatment strategies of jaw osteonecrosis in cancer patients exposed to antiresorptive agents. Future Oncol. 2014;10:257–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Fede O, Fusco V, Matranga D, Solazzo L, Gabriele M, Gaeta GM, et al. Osteonecrosis of the jaws in patients assuming oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a retrospective multi-hospital-based study of 87 Italian cases. Eur J Intern Med. 2013;24:784–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Aghaloo T, Carlson ER, Ward BB, Kademani D. American Association of oral and maxillofacial Surgeons’ position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the Jaws—2022 Update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;80:920–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hata H, Imamachi K, Ueda M, Matsuzaka M, Hiraga H, Osanai T, et al. Prognosis by cancer type and incidence of zoledronic acid-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a single-center retrospective study. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30:4505–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coleman R, De Boer R, Eidtmann H, Llombart A, Davidson N, Neven P, et al. Zoledronic acid (zoledronate) for postmenopausal women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant letrozole (ZO-FAST study): final 60-month results. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hortobagyi GN, Van Poznak C, Harker WG, Gradishar WJ, Chew H, Dakhil SR, et al. Continued treatment effect of zoledronic acid dosing every 12 vs 4 weeks in women with breast cancer metastatic to bone: the OPTIMIZE-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:906–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Fantasia J, Goodday R, Aghaloo T, Mehrotra B, et al. American Association of oral and maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw–2014 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:1938–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Diana A, Carlino F, Giunta EF, Franzese E, Guerrera LP, Di Lauro V, et al. Cancer Treatment-Induced Bone loss (CTIBL): state of the art and proper management in breast Cancer patients on endocrine therapy. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2021;22:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization. Global Cancer Observatory - GLOBOCAN 2020. https://gco.iarc.fr/databases.php. Accessed 2 Sep 2021.

  15. WHO. Breast cancer. 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer. Accessed 28 June 2022.

  16. World Cancer Research Fund International. Breast cancer statistics. World Cancer Research Fund International. https://www.wcrf.org/cancer-trends/breast-cancer-statistics/. Accessed 31 Aug 2022.

  17. Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, Santini D, Chow E, Terpos E, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines †. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1650–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Handforth C, D’Oronzo S, Coleman R, Brown J. Cancer treatment and bone health. Calcif Tissue Int. 2018;102:251–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hadji P, Body JJ, Aapro MS, Brufsky A, Coleman RE, Guise T, et al. Practical guidance for the management of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1407–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. de Sire A, Lippi L, Venetis K, Morganti S, Sajjadi E, Curci C, et al. Efficacy of antiresorptive drugs on bone mineral density in post-menopausal women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Front Oncol. 2022;66:11.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gnant M, Pfeiler G, Steger GG, Egle D, Greil R, Fitzal F, et al. Adjuvant denosumab in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (ABCSG-18): disease-free survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:339–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brufsky AM, Sereika SM, Mathew A, Tomifumi O, Singh V, Rosenzweig M. Long-term treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates in metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective study. Breast J. 2013;19:504–11.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kizub DA, Miao J, Schubert MM, Paterson AHGG, Clemons M, Dees EC, et al. Risk factors for bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw in the prospective randomized trial of adjuvant bisphosphonates for early-stage breast cancer (SWOG 0307). Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:2509–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Coleman R, Finkelstein DM, Barrios C, Martin M, Iwata H, Hegg R, et al. Adjuvant denosumab in early breast cancer (D-CARE): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fusco V, Mauceri R, Campisi G, Bedogni A. RE: American Association of oral and maxillofacial Surgeons’ position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the Jaws—2022 update: quantitative risk assessment and controversial issues. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;80:1871–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1495–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bedogni A, Fedele S, Bedogni G, Scoletta M, Favia G, Colella G, et al. Staging of osteonecrosis of the jaw requires computed tomography for accurate definition of the extent of bony disease. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52:603–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Everts-Graber J, Lehmann D, Burkard JP, Schaller B, Gahl B, Häuselmann HJ, et al. Risk of osteonecrosis of the Jaw under Denosumab compared to Bisphosphonates in patients with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2022;37:340–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anastasilakis AD, Pepe J, Napoli N, Palermo A, Magopoulos C, Khan AA, et al. Osteonecrosis of the jaw and antiresorptive agents in benign and malignant diseases: a critical review organized by the ECTS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107:1441–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brown JE, Handforth C, Compston JE, Cross W, Parr N, Selby P, et al. Guidance for the assessment and management of prostate cancer treatment-induced bone loss. A consensus position statement from an expert group. J Bone Oncol. 2020;25:66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith MR, Saad F, Coleman R, Shore N, Fizazi K, Tombal B, et al. Denosumab and bone-metastasis-free survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: results of a phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nisi M, Karapetsa D, Gennai S, Ramaglia L, Graziani F, Gabriele M. Conservative surgical treatment of medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) lesions in patients affected by osteoporosis exposed to oral bisphosphonates: 24 months follow-up. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018;46:1153–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Oteri G, Trifirò G, Peditto M, Lo Presti L, Marcianò I, Giorgianni F, et al. Treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the Jaw and its impact on a patient’s quality of life: a single-center, 10-year experience from Southern Italy. Drug Saf. 2018;41:111–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nicolatou-Galitis O, Papadopoulou E, Vardas E, Kouri M, Galiti D, Galitis E, et al. Alveolar bone histological necrosis observed prior to extractions in patients, who received bone-targeting agents. Oral Dis. 2020;26:955–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yarom N, Fedele S, Lazarovici TS, Elad S. Is exposure of the Jawbone Mandatory for establishing the diagnosis of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the Jaw? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rao NJ, Wang JY, Yu RQ, Leung YY, Zheng LW. Role of periapical diseases in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. Biomed Res Int. 2017;6:66.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Otto S, Aljohani S, Fliefel R, Ecke S, Ristow O, Burian E, et al. Infection as an important factor in medication-related osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ). Medicine. 2021;57:463.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mauceri R, Panzarella V, Carbone MI, Oteri G, Marcianó A et al. fede olga di,. Histological findings of osteonecrosis spotted prior to tooth extractions. Should we consider tooth extraction still the main trigger event? Qeios. 2021. https://doi.org/10.32388/JK459H.2.

  39. Srivastava A, Nogueras Gonzalez GM, Geng Y, Won AM, Cabanillas ME, Naing A, et al. Prevalence of medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients treated with sequential antiresorptive drugs: systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:2305–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Eisen A, Somerfield MR, Accordino MK, Blanchette PS, Clemons MJ, Dhesy-Thind S, et al. Use of adjuvant bisphosphonates and other bone-modifying agents in breast cancer: ASCO-OH (CCO) guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:787–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Di Fede O, Panzarella V, Mauceri R, Fusco V, Bedogni A, Lo Muzio L, et al. The dental management of patients at risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: new paradigm of primary prevention. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mauceri R, Coniglio R, Abbinante A, Carcieri P, Tomassi D, Panzarella V, et al. The preventive care of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ): a position paper by italian experts for dental hygienists. Support Care Cancer. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06940-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Huang J-F, Shen J, Li X, Rengan R, Silvestris N, Wang M, et al. Incidence of patients with bone metastases at diagnosis of solid tumors in adults: a large population-based study. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:482–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

The Unit of Oral Medicine, “Paolo Giaccone” Policlinico University Hospital of Palermo (Italy) was supported by the Sicilian Department of Health with AIFA’s funding.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Giuseppina Campisi

    Present address: Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via L. Giuffrè 5, 90127, Palermo, PA, Italy

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via L. Giuffrè 5, 90127, Palermo, PA, Italy

    Rodolfo Mauceri & Martina Coppini

  2. Department of Economics, Business and Statistics, University of Palermo, 90128, Palermo, Italy

    Massimo Attanasio

  3. Regional Center for Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Medication and Radiation-Related Bone Diseases of the Head and Neck, University of Padova, 35128, Padova, Italy

    Alberto Bedogni & Giordana Bettini

  4. Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Di Alessandria SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15121, Alessandria, Italy

    Vittorio Fusco

  5. School of Dentistry, Department of Health Sciences, Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, “Magna Grecia” University of Catanzaro, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy

    Amerigo Giudice

  6. Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126, Pisa, Italy

    Filippo Graziani & Marco Nisi

  7. Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, 98124, Messina, Italy

    Antonia Marcianò & Giacomo Oteri

  8. Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgery Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy

    Gaetano Isola & Rosalia Maria Leonardi

  9. Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Clinica del Mediterraneo di Ragusa, 97100, Ragusa, Italy

    Corrado Toro

  10. University Hospital Policlinico “Paolo Giaccone” of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy

    Giuseppina Campisi

Authors
  1. Rodolfo Mauceri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martina Coppini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Massimo Attanasio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alberto Bedogni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giordana Bettini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vittorio Fusco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Amerigo Giudice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Filippo Graziani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Antonia Marcianò
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Marco Nisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Gaetano Isola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Rosalia Maria Leonardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Giacomo Oteri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Corrado Toro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Giuseppina Campisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M., A.B., V.F. and G.C.; methodology, R.M. and G.C.; investigation, R.M., G.B., A.G., A.M., M.N., G.I., C.T.; data curation, M.C., G.B., A.G., A.M., M.N., G.I., C.T.; formal analysis, R.M., M.C. and M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M., M.C. and G.B.; writing—review and editing, A.B., V.F., F.G., R.M.L. and G.C.; visualization, R.M. and M.C.; project administration, G.C. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodolfo Mauceri.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards, and it was approved by the central institutional review board (Coordinator Centre approval ID: #4/2012—“Paolo Giaccone” Policlinico University Hospital in Palermo, Italy). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All other authors have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mauceri, R., Coppini, M., Attanasio, M. et al. MRONJ in breast cancer patients under bone modifying agents for cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL): a multi-hospital-based case series. BMC Oral Health 23, 71 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02732-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02732-6

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us