Skip to main content

Influence of surface nanotopography and wettability on early phases of peri-implant soft tissue healing: an in-vivo study in dogs



It is well established that nanotopography and wettability of implant surfaces contribute to osseointegration and long-term implant success. However, the effects of a hydrogenated surface with nanotubular and superhydrophilic properties on peri-implant soft tissue remain unclear. This study was designed to study the impact of a modified abutment surface on early soft tissue integration compared with a machined surface.


Thirty-six implants were placed at the bone level in the bilateral mandible of six beagles, followed by healing abutments belonging to the standard machined Ti-6Al-4V alloy abutments (TC4-M), anodized abutments with nanotubes (TC4-Nano), and hydrogenated abutments (TC4-H/Nano) groups, which were randomly screwed to the implants. After two and four weeks of wound healing, the animals were euthanized for histological evaluation.


A superhydrophilic nanotubular surface developed on the hydrogenated abutment. Histological and histometric analyses revealed similar peri-implant soft tissue healing and dimensions for the three types of abutments at two and four weeks. Connective tissue (CT) length was longer around TC4-H/Nano abutments compared with standard abutments; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Moreover, collagen fibers in the TC4-H/Nano group extended and were attached perpendicularly to the superhydrophilic surface.


Our results revealed that the soft tissue interface adjacent to the hydrogenated abutment is comparable to that of the machined abutment. A tendency of increased CT length and perpendicular collagen fibers was observed around the modified abutment. This study suggests that nanotubular/superhydrophilic surfaces could be a promising modification to enhance soft tissue sealing. However, comprehensive studies should be conducted to evaluate the peri-implant soft tissue around the modified abutment immunohistochemically, histopathologically, and clinically.

Peer Review reports


Titanium and its alloys are widely applied to dental implants due to their high corrosion resistance, mechanical properties, and excellent biocompatibility. The Ti-6Al-4V alloy (TC4) is of particular interest in clinical applications, considering its better density, elastic modulus, and mechanical strength than titanium [1, 2]. While Ti-6Al-4V implants in the market have achieved high clinical success, especially regarding osseointegration, soft tissue integration has been more challenging. The implant-soft tissue interface is fragile due to weak connective tissue (CT) attachment and epidermal downgrowth, leading to bacterial infiltration, tissue inflammation, and ultimately, marginal bone loss (MBL) [3, 4]. Therefore, sound soft tissue and marginal bone are beneficial for the long-term clinical stability of dental implants.

Previous investigations attempted different strategies to improve the soft tissue integration. López-López et al. [5] demonstrated that anatomic healing abutments are conducive to the maintenance of peri-implant soft tissue and marginal bone level in comparison to concave–straight abutments. Although Sinjari et al. [6] did not find less MBL around a scalloped implant shoulder, it must be noted that the festooned implant neck with support for the soft tissues could be important for aesthetics.

In addition to the design of transmucosal portion, different surface modifications have been proposed to achieve better barrier function of peri-implant soft tissue [7]. One principle is based on nano-modification of implant abutments to promote soft tissue integration. Electrochemical anodization has been applied to imparting nanotopography, including nanotubes, nanograss, nanopores, and nanotemplates to Ti implants [8]. Gulati et al. [9] proved that aligned nanopores on the micro-grooved titanium surface selectively enhanced the activity of osteoblasts and fibroblasts. Similarly, other in vitro studies have suggested that nanostructured surfaces enhance the adhesion and initial growth of epithelial cells and fibroblasts [10,11,12]. Nanostructured morphology, mechanical strength, electroactivity, and adsorption capacity of nanotubes might be useful for the treatments in dentistry [13, 14]. More importantly, hydrophilicity plays an important role in wound healing, leading to faster protein adsorption, cell adhesion, and improved tissue integration [15,16,17]. Matter et al. [18] demonstrated that a one-step synthesis of nanoarchitected and superhydrophilic coatings promoted fibroblasts adhesion and exhibits antimicrobial properties.

Although several studies have concentrated on the interactions between different kinds of cells and biomaterial surfaces, few studies have established the effects of surface nanotopography and wettability on peri-implant mucosa healing in vivo. A previous study demonstrated that a hydrophilic surface with nanocrystalline diamond decreased inflammatory responses and stimulated cell proliferation during the initial healing phase [19]. Recently, a clinical study showed a thicker CT portion at abutments with plasma treatment, which could be attributed to bioactivation and increased wettability of the abutment surface through plasma [20]. Despite the different efforts, the implant-soft tissue interface could not rival the natural periodontal tissue.

As previously shown, hydrogenated nanotubes with superhydrophilicity have been verified to promote adhesion, migration, and extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis of gingival fibroblasts in vitro [21]. However, the biological effect of this modified surface on peri-implant soft tissue in vivo remains unclear. In addition, limited information about Ti-6Al-4V alloy modified with nanostructure and superhydrophilicity applied as an implant abutment in vivo has been provided.

Thus, this study aimed to assess soft tissue healing around Ti-6Al-4V alloy abutments with nanotubes and superhydrophilic surfaces regarding histometric outcomes and collagen fiber orientation during the early stages of wound healing in a canine model.


Abutment preparation

The diagram summarising the design of this study is displayed in Fig. 1.

Healing abutments (Ti-6Al-4V, TC4) with a 3.5 mm platform and 3 mm cuff height (Zimmer Biomet Dental, HC333) were used. Standard abutments with machined surfaces were used as the control group (TC4-M). Anodized abutments with nanotubes (TC4-Nano) and hydrogenated abutments (TC4-H/Nano) were produced as previously described [15]. Briefly, standard abutments were oxidation anodized in ethylene glycol at 50 V for 15 min and annealed at 500 °C for 2 h in air. After ultrasonication, the TC4-Nano was obtained. Subsequently, the anodized specimens were annealed in hydrogen (0.95 × 105 Pa) at 500 °C for another 4 h to prepare hydrogenated abutments (TC4-H/Nano).

Twelve samples of each group (TC4-M, TC4-Nano, and TC4-H/Nano) were used for the subsequent characteristic assessments, and another twelve samples of each group were sterilised by autoclaving and used for the in vivo experiments.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The diagram summarising the design of this study.

Characterization of the specimens

For surface morphology observation, field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; S4800, Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was performed on the different groups of abutments. An accelerating voltage of 15 kV was chosen, and the SEM images were recorded from the surfaces at normal incidence [9] under high vacuum by a secondary electron detector. Elemental analysis of the abutment surface was performed using SEM-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). Chemical elements were detected by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) [22]. The surface roughness was analyzed using atomic force microscopy (AFM; Nanoscope V, Veeco Plainview, NY, USA). Briefly, three randomized areas (5 μm × 5 μm) were characterized on each sample (three samples per group) to get the average surface roughness (Ra), which was calculated by software NanoScope Analysis 1.8 (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) [23]. An optical contact angle measuring device (Model OCA15pro, Dataphysics Co., Ltd., Germany) was employed for water contact angle measurements [24]. In short, 2 µL of distilled water was dropped on the surface, and a picture was captured using a high-resolution camera. Then the contact angle was analysed by ellipse fitting method. Each sample was tested three times, and three samples were detected in each group.

Study animals

Six lab-bred male beagles (Fangyuanyuan Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) approximately 1 year of age were used for this study. All beagles were randomly divided into two groups. Three beagles in Group A were observed for 2 weeks after placement of the healing abutments, while three beagles in Group B were allowed to heal for 4 weeks. It has been reported that epithelial healing around teeth and dental implants is achieved in 1–2 weeks [25], and the integrity of soft tissue wound and the organization of collagen fibers are nearly accomplished in 4–6 weeks [26, 27]. Thus, two time points (2 and 4 weeks) were selected in this study to investigate early stages of soft tissue healing around Ti-6Al-4V alloy abutments.

This study was conducted in accordance with a protocol approved by the ‘Animal Ethical and Welfare Committee’ of Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Guiding Principles for Research Involving Animals. The animals were individually housed at the Laboratory Animal Center of Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University (Beijing, China). All beagles were acclimatized for 2 weeks prior to the surgeries. No animals were lost during the study. This manuscript was prepared in accordance with the ARRIVE (animal research: reporting of in vivo experiments) guidelines for animal research reports.

Dental implants and abutments

Zimmer Tapered Screw-Vent (TSV) implants with a microtextured surface of 3.7 mm diameter and 8 mm length (Zimmer Biomet Dental, TSVB8) were used for all groups. Six TSV implants, three in each hemimandible, were placed per beagle. After that, three healing abutments from each group (TC4-M, TC4-Nano, and TC4-H/Nano, as shown in Fig. 2a) were installed in each hemimandible based on a computer-generated randomization chart, negating the possibility of a biased abutment position in the hemimandible. There were six experiments in each group at each time point. Based on the literature and previous experience, we estimated that a significance level of 5% would be achieved with n = 6.



The food was restrained 12 h before the surgeries. All surgical procedures were conducted by the same surgeon. All surgeries were conducted under general anesthesia with a mixture of Sumianxin II (0.08–0.1 mL/kg, Jilin Huamu Animal Care Products, Ltd, Jilin, China) and 3% pentobarbital sodium (0.5 mL/kg, Beijing Daniel Spulber Biotech, Beijing, China) via intramuscular administration. Subsequently, 1.7 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline (Septanest; Septodont, Cholet, France) was used for local anesthesia.

Extractions of the bilateral mandibular premolars were performed as described in a previous article [28]. Briefly, the premolars were sectioned in buccolingual directions, followed by nontraumatic extractions with root elevators and forceps. The sockets were then sutured with collagen sponges. Following the surgical procedures, beagles received benzylpenicillin sodium (40,000 IU/kg, Shandong Shengwang pharmaceutical Co., LTD, Jining, China) via intramuscular administration for three days and a soft diet was used for 1 week. The extraction sockets were allowed to heal for three months.

Implant and healing abutment placement

After three months of healing, the implants were placed following the manufacturers’ recommendations.The procedure used for implant placement has been described in detail in another study [29]. Briefly, crestal incisions were made, followed by the elevation of the mucoperiosteal flaps. After flattening the edentulous ridge, spaces between implants were measured, and the osteotomy sites were prepared under chilled normal saline solution (Fig. 2b). Three implants were placed in each hemimandible, with the buccolingual implant shoulder at the marginal bone crest level (Fig. 2c). Next, three healing abutments from each group were installed based on a computer-generated randomization chart (Fig. 2d). The flaps were approximated using interrupted sutures (Fig. 2e). The implants and abutments remained in vivo for two or four weeks prior to animal sacrifice. The postoperative protocol used for implant placement was the same as for tooth extraction.

No implants were lost during the experiment period, and no signs of peri-implant inflammation were observed. Figure 2f shows the three abutments and surrounding soft tissue at four weeks of healing.

Histological preparation

After two or four weeks of healing, the animals were sacrificed using an overdose of pentobarbital sodium (100 mg/kg). ​Histological procedures were carried out based on previously published articles [30, 31]. In short, mandibular segments were dissected into blocks containing implants, abutments, and the ambient hard and soft tissues. The blocks were immersed in a solution of 10% formalin for 24 h and then washed with current water for 24 h. After dehydration in graded ethanol, the blocks were embedded in methylmethacrylate and sectioned into buccolingual slices, aiming for the center of the implant and abutment along the long axis. The slices were ground and polished to a final thickness of 30–40 μm. The obtained sections were stained with Van Gieson’s stain and analyzed using a light microscope (BX51; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Clinical pictures illustrating the experimental surgery. (a) Experimental groups: standard machined abutment (TC4-M), anode oxidized abutment (TC4-Nano), and hydrogenated abutment (TC4-H/Nano). (b) At 3 months after tooth extraction, the osteotomy site was prepared to the desired diameter for implant placement. (c) TSV implants were placed bilaterally in the lower jaws (6 implants per animal). (d) Healing abutments were immediately connected (from left to right: TC4-Nano, TC4-H/Nano, TC4-M). (e) The flaps were mobilized with interrupted sutures. (f) The three abutments and surrounding mucosa at 4 weeks of healing. (from left to right: TC4-Nano, TC4-H/Nano, TC4-M).

Histologic and histometric analyses

Histologic and histometric outcomes were observed by the same experienced investigator using ImageJ software. The following landmarks were designated in the buccolingual sections (Fig. 3) according to a method published previously [32]:

  • PM: peri-implant mucosa margin.

  • cJE: most coronal point of the junctional epithelium.

  • aJE: apical extension of the junctional epithelium.

  • BIC: most coronal portion of the bone-implant contact.

Linear measurements between landmarks were performed by drawing a vertical line along the long axis of the abutment. The measurements were performed as follows:

  • SE: length of sulcular epithelium (PM-cJE).

  • JE: length of junctional epithelium (cJE-aJE).

  • BE: barrier epithelium consisted of the dimension of SE and JE (PM-aJE).

  • CT: length of connective tissue (aJE-BIC).

  • BW: biological width consisted of the dimension of JE and CT (cJE-BIC).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Landmarks for histometric evaluation. PM, peri-implant mucosa margin; cJE, most coronal point of the junctional epithelium; aJE, apical extension of the junctional epithelium; BIC, most coronal portion of the bone-implant contact. Linear measurements between landmarks: SE, length of sulcular epithelium (PM-cJE); JE, length of junctional epithelium (cJE-aJE); BE, barrier epithelium consisted of the dimension of SE and JE (PM-aJE); CT, length of connective tissue (aJE-BIC); BW, biological width consisted of the dimension of JE and CT (cJE-BIC); PMH, peri-implant mucosa height (PM-BIC).

Collagen fiber orientation

To detect collagen fiber distribution and orientation in the CT surrounding the abutments, the sections were analyzed using second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy (Olympus, Japan). The excitation wavelength was 890 nm, and images of the SHG signal were collected using a 445 nm detection barrier filter to observe the collagen fibers [33].

Statistical analysis

The variables are expressed as mean values and standard deviations (SDs). IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0 software (International Business Machines Corporation, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. The Kolmogorow-Smirnow test was applied to analyze the normal distribution of the data rows. Multiple comparisons were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) When the homogeneity variance of the data was not assumed, Kruskal-Wallis test was used [34]. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Characterization of the specimens

The surface morphologies of all specimens were characterized by SEM. As shown in Fig. 4a, the machined abutment (TC4-M) surface was relatively smooth with regular mechanical polishing scratches, whereas TC4-Nano and TC4-H/Nano showed non-uniformly arranged nanotube arrays because of the existence of α and β phases in the TC4 alloy, with a diameter of approximately 100 nm. Shorter nanotubes were formed in the β-phase (Fig. 4a, white arrows). Significantly, the original nanotubular geometry was unaltered after the thermal hydrogenation treatment.

The EDS spectra are shown in Fig. 4b, and the quantitative results are presented in Table 1. The TC4-M abutment consisted of Ti, Al, and V. In addition, O was observed in the TC4-Nano (62.88%) and TC4-H/Nano (60.4%). The TC4-H/Nano group showed a percentage decrease in O compared to TC4-Nano due to thermal hydrogenation.

Table 1 Elemental surface composition (at%) of differently modified TC4-M, TC4-Nano and TC4-H/Nano abutment surfaces (mean ± SD).

To further characterize the chemical valence environment, the O 1s XPS spectra of TC4-Nano and TC4-H/Nano were compared (Fig. 4c). The O 1s peaks can be decomposed into three peaks; the peaks at 529.5 and 530.1 eV are ascribed to Ti-O species on the surface, and the broader peak at 531.1 eV corresponds to Ti-OH [35, 36]. The percentage of OOH atoms increased from 14.1 to 31.1% after hydrogenation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Characterizations of the specimens. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the TC4-M abutment surface at low magnification (×3000); the TC4-Nano abutment surface at high magnification (×30,000); and the TC4-H/Nano abutment surface at high magnification (×30,000). White arrows: shorter nanotubes formed in the β-phase. (b) Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) spectra of the TC4-M, TC4-Nano and TC4-H/Nano. (c) High-resolution O 1s peaks of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).

As shown in Fig. 5a, the roughness of nanotopography significantly increased compared with the machined abutment (p < 0.01), whereas the roughness of TC4-H/Nano and TC4-Nano was not significantly different (p > 0.05). The average contact angles of all the groups are displayed in Fig. 5b. The TC4-M group featured a hydrophobic surface (94.7°), whereas the contact angle of TC4-Nano was reduced to 38.8°. Notably, TC4-H/Nano displayed a superhydrophilic surface with a contact angle of 3.8°.

Fig. 5
figure 5

(a) Surface roughness of the specimens. (b) The water contact angle of the specimens


Histological examination of the peri-implant mucosa adjacent to different abutments was performed using an optical microscope. Similar observations on the wound healing process and tissue structure at the soft tissue-abutment interface were observed for all groups. The peri-implant soft tissue of TC4-H/Nano at the healing time points of two (Fig. 6a-c) and four weeks (Fig. 6d-f) are illustrated.

After two weeks of healing, the peri-implant mucosa was separated from the abutment surface by a gap (Fig. 6a). The proliferation of the epithelium and JE was observed in the soft tissue margin. A newly formed loose CT zone with fewer fibers was rich in inflammatory cells (Fig. 6c). The peri-implant mucosa maintained close contact with the abutment surface after four weeks of healing (Fig. 6d). A BE was formed, and the number of inflammatory cells decreased. The loose CT became well-organized and was replaced by large portions of collagen fibers. There were more fibroblasts and fewer inflammatory cells in the CT.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Histologic images of peri-implant soft tissue in TC4-H/Nano group representing (a, b, c) 2 weeks and (d, e, f) 4 weeks of healing. (a, d) original magnification ×40. (b, c) Details of (a), original magnification ×100. (e, f) Details of (d), original magnification ×100. SE, sulcular epithelium; JE: junctional epithelium; aJE: apical termination of junctional epithelium.

Histometric measurements

Descriptive analyses of the peri-implant mucosa heights, including epithelial and CT dimensions assessed at two and four weeks of healing, are illustrated in Table 2. The SE length was approximately 0.6–0.7 mm in all the groups. The BW around the abutment was formed as early as two weeks, and the dimensions were near 3 mm in all groups. Except for SE, the other soft tissue dimensions at four weeks were slightly longer than those at two weeks without a statistically significant difference.

At four weeks of healing, the JE length in the standard abutment group (1.3 ± 0.3 mm) was longer than that in the TC4-H/Nano (0.9 ± 0.3 mm), while the CT length in the standard abutment (1.9 ± 0.3 mm) was shorter than that in the TC4-H/Nano (2.1 ± 0.6 mm). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between all groups.

Table 2 Descriptive analysis of histometric measurements (mean ± SD).

Collagen fiber orientation

Images of peri-implant collagen structure and fiber orientation observed by optical and SHG microscopy are shown in Fig. 7. After four weeks of wound healing, loose tissue structure and less fiber composition were observed in the CT attached to TC4-M. However, adjacent to the TC4-Nano and TC4-H/Nano abutment surfaces, histological images showed a dense CT with more collagen fibers formed. SHG images showed that while collagen fibers in TC4-M and TC4-Nano groups ran parallel to the abutment surface, fibers adjacent to TC4-H/Nano tended to extend and were partially oriented perpendicular to the surface.

Fig. 7
figure 7

After four weeks of wound healing, histologic and SHG images of connective tissue (CT) adjacent to the abutment surface in all three groups. Red line: orientation of collagen fibers.


This study was designed to evaluate the possible advantages of a superhydrophilic nanotubular abutment surface over a machined surface regarding histometric soft tissue dimensions and collagen fiber orientation at the early stage of soft tissue integration.

Unlike our previous studies on pure titanium modification, the nanotubes on the TC4 alloy surface were nonuniform. Owing to the existence of the α and β phases in the TC4 alloy, an uneven etching rate in an electrolyte containing F was expected. The substrate of the β phase was enriched with vanadium oxides, resulting in a high solubility [37, 38]. Therefore, shorter nanotubes were formed in the β-phase (Fig. 4a, white arrows).

Our previous in vitro study demonstrated that the hydrogenated nanotubular surface can promote wound healing of gingival fibroblasts [21]. Costantini et al. [39] proved that the wound healing phase could be accelerated by driving the transition from the inflammation to the tissue repair. In the present in vivo study, we observed less inflammatory cells around abutments at 4 weeks. In order to better understand the wound healing around the nanotubular/superhydrophilic surface, a comprehensive analysis of the process of inflammation, proliferation and reconstruction in vivo should be conducted in the future.

In this in vivo experiment, the soft tissue dimensions surrounding the modified abutments were evaluated using histometric analysis. Our results revealed a relatively stable BW during the 2–4 weeks. These findings are consistent with those observed in another beagle study [26]. However, Berglundh et al. [27] and Tomasi et al. [40] suggested that it may take 6–8 weeks of healing to develop the BW in the transmucosal region. To date, definitive conclusions have not been attained.

Most studies have proved that surface modification (morphological, chemical, and biological modification) of materials at the transmucosal portion has limited influence on soft tissue dimensions [29, 32, 41]. In contrast, another study revealed that a longer CT seal developed in AO and AO + polydopamine groups (p < 0.05) [42]. It is worth noting that our present study showed a longer CT length surrounding the superhydrophilic nanotubes, combined with a shorter epithelium after four weeks of healing. However, this tendency was not statistically significant, which could be attributed to the small sample size. Schwarz et al. [43] designed a proof-of-concept clinical study for evaluating the performance of hydrophilic abutment surfaces in humans. Although not statistically significant, the study indicated quantitative and qualitative improvements in peri-implant soft tissue attachment to hydrophilic abutments. Therefore, we speculated that the superhydrophilic abutment surface could promote CT attachment, thus inhibiting the apical migration of the JE. However, further studies may be required based on a larger sample size and extended observation time.

SHG microscopy was innovatively employed for peri-implant collagen fiber observation in this study. Direct visualization of the tissue structure, orientation, and polarization of chiral proteins can be achieved by SHG with high resolution and specificity [44], which is derived from the interaction of near-infrared light with non-centrosymmetric tissues such as collagen and myosin. Although SHG is commonly applied to scar tissue and tumors [33, 45], it has not been used to image peri-implant tissues in oral. Our SHG results demonstrated that collagen fibers were partially perpendicular to the hydrogenated abutment, indicating that a superhydrophilic surface was conducive to the functional attachment of CT. Nevertheless, quantitative analysis of the orientation should be conducted in the future.

Schwarz et al. [26] speculated that hydrophilicity could be more important for collagen fibers orientation than surface topography. Similarly, a previous investigation indicated that the number of vertical fibers around a superhydrophilic implant increased compared to that around a machined abutment [32]. Overall, a superhydrophilic surface may be beneficial for the formation of a soft tissue barrier and subsequently reduce the risk of peri-implantitis. However, further in vivo experiments should be conducted to investigate the superhydrophilic surface regarding the prevention of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis in a peri-implantitis model.

Although surface modification of transmucosal materials might have little influence on soft tissue dimensions, it could improve the healing process and promote peri-implant soft tissue health in long term [46, 47] by reducing inflammation [19], promoting vascularization and expression of adhesion-related biomolecules [48, 49], and collagen fiber attachment [50]. A recent review also indicated that some properties of transmucosal abutments might affect soft tissue attachment and stability [7].

In this study, limited information on cellular and matrix levels such as cell interactions, immunological factors, and connective tissue adhesion-related mechanisms was available only through histologic and histometric analyses. Therefore, to better understand the mechanisms of soft tissue integration, future researches should be conducted to comprehensively analyze the impact of superhydrophilic abutments surfaces on the clinical, histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular biological aspects of peri-implant soft tissue. In addition, further studies based on larger sample sizes, extended observation times, and peri-implantitis models may be required.


Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that abutments with nanotubular and superhydrophilic surfaces compared with machined titanium alloy surfaces displayed a similar impact on healing conditions and peri-implant soft tissue dimensions but with a tendency to increase CT height and perpendicular collagen fibers. However, this tendency was not statistically significant. Our study implied that imparting nanotubular/superhydrophilic topography to conventional TC4 abutments is a promising modification to enhance soft tissue sealing.

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.



machined Ti-6Al-4V alloy abutments




hydrogenated nanotubes


connective tissue


marginal bone loss


extracellular matrix


field-emission scanning electron microscopy


energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy


X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy


atomic force microscopy


animal research:reporting of in vivo experiments


tapered screw-vent


peri-implant mucosa margin


most coronal point of the junctional epithelium


apical extension of the junctional epithelium


most coronal portion of the bone-implant contact


sulcular epithelium


junctional epithelium


barrier epithelium


biological width


peri-implant mucosa height


second harmonic generation


standard deviation


one-way analysis of variance


anodic oxidation


  1. Bauera S, Schmukia P, Mark Kd, Park J. Engineering biocompatible implant surfaces part I: materials and surfaces. Prog Mater Sci. 2013;58(3):261–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaur M, Singh K. Review on titanium and titanium based alloys as biomaterials for orthopaedic applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;102:844–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Atsuta I, Ayukawa Y, Kondo R, Oshiro W, Matsuura Y, Furuhashi A, et al. Soft tissue sealing around dental implants based on histological interpretation. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60(1):3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hämmerle CHF, Giannobile WV. Biology of soft tissue wound healing and regeneration–consensus report of Group 1 of the 10th european workshop on Periodontology. Biology of soft tissue wound healing and regeneration–consensus report of Group 1 of the 10th european workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(Suppl):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. López-López PJ, Mareque-Bueno J, Boquete-Castro A, Aguilar-Salvatierra Raya A, Martínez-González JM, Calvo-Guirado JL. The effects of healing abutments of different size and anatomic shape placed immediately in extraction sockets on peri-implant hard and soft tissues. A pilot study in foxhound dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(1):90–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sinjari B, D’Addazio G, Santilli M, D’Avanzo B, Rexhepi I, Scarano A, et al. A 4 year human, randomized, radiographic study of scalloped versus non-scalloped cemented implants. Mater (Basel). 2020;13(9):2190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Canullo L, Annunziata M, Pesce P, Tommasato G, Nastri L, Guida L. Influence of abutment material and modifications on peri-implant soft-tissue attachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of histological animal studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(3):426–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gulati K, Zhang Y, Di P, Liu Y, Ivanovski S. Research to clinics: clinical translation considerations for anodized nano-engineered titanium implants. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8(10):4077–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gulati K, Moon HJ, Li T, Sudheesh Kumar PT, Ivanovski S. Titania nanopores with dual micro-/nano-topography for selective cellular bioactivity. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018;91:624–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou P, Mao F, He F, Han Y, Li H, Chen J, et al. Screening the optimal hierarchical micro/nano pattern design for the neck and body surface of titanium implants. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2019;178:515–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu R, Hu X, Yu X, Wan S, Wu F, Ouyang J, et al. Micro-/nano-topography of selective laser melting titanium enhances adhesion and proliferation and regulates adhesion-related gene expressions of human gingival fibroblasts and human gingival epithelial cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:5045–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Xie D, Xu C, Ye C, Mei S, Wang L, Zhu Q, et al. Fabrication of submicro-nano structures on polyetheretherketone surface by femtosecond laser for exciting cellular responses of MC3T3-E1 cells/gingival epithelial cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:3201–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Di Crescenzo A, Bardini L, Sinjari B, Traini T, Marinelli L, Carraro M, et al. Surfactant hydrogels for the dispersion of carbon-nanotube-based catalysts. Chemistry. 2013;19(48):16415–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonilla-Represa V, Abalos-Labruzzi C, Herrera-Martinez M, Guerrero-Perez MO. Nanomaterials in dentistry: state of the art and future challenges. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020;10(9):1770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu R, Wang C, Wang X, Wang Y, Wang N, Chou J, et al. Effects of hydrogenated TiO2 nanotube arrays on protein adsorption and compatibility with osteoblast-like cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:2037–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. An N, Rausch-fan X, Wieland M, Matejka M, Andrukhov O, Schedle A. Initial attachment, subsequent cell proliferation/viability and gene expression of epithelial cells related to attachment and wound healing in response to different titanium surfaces. Dent Mater. 2012;28(12):1207–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chou WC, Wang RC, Huang CL, Lee TM. The effect of plasma treatment on the osseointegration of rough titanium implant: a histo-morphometric study in rabbits. J Dent Sci. 2018;13(3):267–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Matter MT, Maliqi L, Keevend K, Guimond S, Ng J, Armagan E, et al. One-step synthesis of versatile antimicrobial nano-architected implant coatings for hard and soft tissue healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(28):33300–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stigler RG, Becker K, Bruschi M, Steinmüller-Nethl D, Gassner R. Impact of nano-crystalline diamond enhanced hydrophilicity on cell proliferation on machined and SLA titanium surfaces: an in-vivo study in rodents. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2018;8(7):524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Canullo L, Penarrocha Oltra D, Pesce P, Zarauz C, Lattanzio R, Penarrocha Diago M, et al. Soft tissue integration of different abutment surfaces: an experimental study with histological analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(8):928–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang C, Wang X, Lu R, Gao S, Ling Y, Chen S. Responses of human gingival fibroblasts to superhydrophilic hydrogenated titanium dioxide nanotubes. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2021;198:111489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Piszczek P, Radtke A, Ehlert M, Jedrzejewski T, Sznarkowska A, Sadowska B, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the biological properties of surface-modified titanium alloy implants. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):342.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wen C, Muhetaer HJ, Gao Z, Wu J. Dual response of fibroblasts viability and Porphyromonas gingivalis adhesion on nanostructured zirconia abutment surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2022;110(10):1645–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guo T, Oztug NAK, Han P, Ivanovski S, Gulati K. Old is gold: Electrolyte aging influences the topography, chemistry, and bioactivity of anodized TiO(2) nanopores. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(7):7897–912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sculean A, Gruber R, Bosshardt DD. Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(Suppl):6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwarz F, Ferrari D, Herten M, Mihatovic I, Wieland M, Sager M, et al. Effects of surface hydrophilicity and microtopography on early stages of soft and hard tissue integration at non-submerged titanium implants: an immunohistochemical study in dogs. J Periodontol. 2007;78(11):2171–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Welander M, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Morphogenesis of the peri-implant mucosa: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(1):1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hermann JSCD, Nummikoski PV, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 1997;68(11):1117–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Garrett PW, Johnston GW, Bosshardt DD, Jones AA, Sasada Y, Ong JL, et al. Hard and soft tissue evaluation of titanium dental implants and abutments with nanotubes in canines. J Periodontol. 2020;91(4):516–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Valles C, Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Munoz F, Permuy M, Lopez-Alonso H, Nart J. Influence of implant neck surface and placement depth on crestal bone changes and soft tissue dimensions around platform-switched implants: a histologic study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(7):869–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Neiva R, Tovar N, Jimbo R, Gil LF, Goldberg P, Barbosa JP, et al. The effect of laser-etched surface design on soft tissue healing of two different implant abutment systems: an experimental study in dogs. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016;36(5):673–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Liñares A, Muñoz F, Permuy M, Dard M, Blanco J. Soft tissue histomorphology at implants with a transmucosal modified surface. A study in minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(9):996–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Esquibel CR, Wendt KD, Lee HC, Gaire J, Shoffstall A, Urdaneta ME, et al. Second harmonic generation imaging of collagen in chronically implantable electrodes in brain tissue. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Garcia-Gareta E, Hua J, Orera A, Kohli N, Knowles JC, Blunn GW. Biomimetic surface functionalization of clinically relevant metals used as orthopaedic and dental implants. Biomed Mater. 2017;13(1):015008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen X, Liu L, Yu PY, Mao SS. Increasing solar absorption for photocatalysis with black hydrogenated titanium dioxide nanocrystals. Science. 2011;331(6018):746–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu H, Li D, Zhu X, Yang C, Liu D, Chen X, et al. High-performance and renewable supercapacitors based on TiO2 nanotube array electrodes treated by an electrochemical doping approach. Electrochim Acta. 2014;116:129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Matykina E, Hernandez-López J, Conde A, Domingo C, Damborenea J, Arenas MA. Morphologies of nanostructured TiO2 doped with F on Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Electrochim Acta. 2011;56(5):2221–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yao Q, Jiang Y, Tan S, Fu X, Li B, Liu L. Composition and bioactivity of calcium phosphate coatings on anodic oxide nanotubes formed on pure Ti and Ti-6Al-4V alloy substrates. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;110:110687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Costantini E, Sinjari B, D’Angelo C, Murmura G, Reale M, Caputi S. Human gingival fibroblasts exposed to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields: in vitro model of wound-healing improvement. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(9):2108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Tomasi C, Tessarolo F, Caola I, Wennström J, Nollo G, Berglundh T. Morphogenesis of peri-implant mucosa revisited: an experimental study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(9):997–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Liñares A, Domken O, Dard M, Blanco J. Peri-implant soft tissues around implants with a modified neck surface. Part 1. Clinical and histometric outcomes: a pilot study in minipigs. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40(4):412–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Teng F, Chen H, Xu Y, Liu Y, Ou G. Polydopamine deposition with anodic oxidation for better connective tissue attachment to transmucosal implants. J Periodontal Res. 2018;53(2):222–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schwarz F, Mihatovic I, Becker J, Bormann KH, Keeve PL, Friedmann A. Histological evaluation of different abutments in the posterior maxilla and mandible: an experimental study in humans. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40(8):807–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dudenkova VV, Shirmanova MV, Lukina MM, Feldshtein FI, Virkin A, Zagainova EV. Examination of collagen structure and state by the second harmonic generation microscopy. Biochem (Mosc). 2019;84(Suppl 1):89–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Brown E, McKee T, diTomaso E, Pluen A, Seed B, Boucher Y, et al. Dynamic imaging of collagen and its modulation in tumors in vivo using second-harmonic generation. Nat Med. 2003;9(6):796–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hall J, Neilands J, Davies JR, Ekestubbe A, Friberg B. A randomized, controlled, clinical study on a new titanium oxide abutment surface for improved healing and soft tissue health. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(Suppl 1):55–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Canullo L, Menini M, Santori G, Rakic M, Sculean A, Pesce P. Titanium abutment surface modifications and peri-implant tissue behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(3):1113–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ghinassi B, D’Addazio G, Di Baldassarre A, Femminella B, Di Vincenzo G, Piattelli M, et al. Immunohistochemical results of soft tissues around a new implant healing-abutment surface: a human study. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4):1009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early subepithelial connective tissue attachment at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants. A pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11(3):245–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chien H-H, Schroering RL, Prasad HS, Tatakis DN. Effects of a new implant abutment design on peri-implant soft tissues. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40(5):581–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank Editage ( for English language editing.


This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China [NO. 81873722, 81570999] and Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University Young Scientist Program [NO. YSP202108].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript. CW contributed to conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and manuscript writing. XW conceived the idea. XW and RL contributed to data interpretation. XC and DY participated in all data collection. SC contributed to conception and design and finally approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Su Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with a protocol approved by the Animal Ethical and Welfare Committee of the Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University (Beijing, China; Ref. KQYY-201909-005). All the experiments in this study followed ARRIVE guidelines. This study was conducted in accordance to relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Wang, X., Lu, R. et al. Influence of surface nanotopography and wettability on early phases of peri-implant soft tissue healing: an in-vivo study in dogs. BMC Oral Health 23, 651 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Peri-implant soft tissue
  • Collagen fibers
  • Nanotubes
  • Superhydrophilicity
  • Titanium alloy
  • Abutment