Skip to main content
Download PDF

Unfavourable beliefs about oral health and safety of dental care during pregnancy: a systematic review

BMC Oral Health volume 23, Article number: 762 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Oral conditions such as gingivitis and periodontitis are correlated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia, preterm birth and low birth weight. Oral health-related unfavourable beliefs can have negative influences on oral health behaviours including hesitation in accessing preventative dental treatments and dental service utilization. The objective of this systematic review was to examine unfavourable beliefs that expectant or new mothers frequently hold about oral health and the safety of dental care during pregnancy.

Methods

An electronic database search on PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and MEDLINE (Ovid) followed by forward and backward citation tracing of the included studies was conducted. All English primary studies regardless of the year of publication were independently screened by two reviewers to identify studies addressing unfavourable beliefs about oral health and dental care during pregnancy. The CLARITY tool was applied to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.

Results

Out of a total of 5766 records, 39 quantitative and six qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. The commonly held unfavourable beliefs were regarding the safety of dental services utilization and dental treatment procedures, the adverse impacts of pregnancy on oral health, and oral hygiene necessity during pregnancy. The most discussed unfavourable beliefs included “pregnant women lose their teeth because of pregnancy” (n = 18), “dental treatments are not safe and harm the fetus” (n = 17), and “the developing baby absorbs calcium from the mother’s teeth” (n = 14).

Conclusions

Unfavourable beliefs about oral health and dental care utilization are common among pregnant women and new mothers. The literature suggests that a low level of oral health knowledge and seeking information from social networks can contribute to such beliefs. This has implications for health promotion.

Peer Review reports

Background

Health beliefs refer to individuals’ perceptions and understanding of their own well-being, including their notions of health, factors contributing to their illness, and strategies to combat and recover from ailments [1]. In cases where there is a lack of concrete evidence and professional consensus, incorrect and unfavourable beliefs, if consistently reiterated, can be wrongly accepted as truths [2]. Health-related unfavourable beliefs, which can be due to a lack of scientific understanding, are common and can have negative influences on health and treatment-seeking behaviours [3,4,5]. Factors shown to be associated with a higher likelihood of believing health-related misinformation include lower education levels, lower healthcare knowledge, cultural customs and traditions, distrust in the healthcare system, and pre-existing false beliefs [6, 7]. Several health-related unfavourable beliefs associated with pregnancy have been perpetuated over centuries, some of which are still common, including some related to oral health especially during pregnancy [8, 9].

Oral health-related unfavourable beliefs are directly correlated with oral health service avoidance and higher unmet oral treatment needs of pregnant women [10]. Consequently, oral health conditions during pregnancy are considered “normal” and pregnant women are expected to cope with their oral conditions such as oral health-related pain, gingivitis, periodontitis, tooth decay and other dental conditions [11]. Further, unfavourable beliefs about the unsafety of dental treatment prevent pregnant women from dental visits [12]. Such unfavourable oral health beliefs that act as a barrier to oral health care services utilization can therefore leave oral conditions untreated which may result in decreased oral health-related quality of life and is correlated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia, preterm birth and low birth weight [13, 14].

Given the adverse impacts of unfavourable beliefs on dental care services utilization and oral health status, it is important to identify such beliefs to dismantle false information and increase awareness of the importance of oral health during pregnancy. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to identify commonly held unfavourable beliefs about oral health and dental treatment during pregnancy.

Methods

The protocol for this systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022358790) on September 19th, 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was utilized as a guideline for the workflow of this systematic review [15]; details can be found in Additional file 1.

Search strategy and study selection

We conducted an electronic search using four databases, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and MEDLINE (Ovid) in May 2022. The search was updated in January 2023. We also conducted forward and backward citation tracing for included articles to locate relevant articles missed from this database search. The search terms were a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary. The search strategy for all four databases is provided in Additional file 2.

The titles and abstracts of all articles identified through database searching were imported to COVIDENCE. It is a web-based systematic review program which facilitates most of the evidence synthesis steps including citation importing, screening, quality assessment, and data extraction [16]). Two reviewers (YMK and NMZ) independently performed the level 1 (title and abstract) screening. Subsequently, the full texts of the articles included after level 1 screening were uploaded to COVIDENCE for the purpose of full-text screening (level 2) which was independently conducted by the two reviewers based on the eligibility criteria (described below). Disagreements for both screening levels were solved through a discussion and reaching a consensus. For forward and backward citation tracing, all references and citing articles of the included studies were again added to COVIDENCE and the above screening steps were performed on them in the same way.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were: 1) the study population was pregnant women or mothers of children under 6 years of age (as it is suggested that prenatal information can be accurately retrieved with a recall span of up to four to six years after delivery [17]); 2) the study was a primary investigation, regardless of study design and year of publication; 3) the article was written in English; 4) the study assessed beliefs about at least one of the impacts of pregnancy on a mother’s oral health; oral health on pregnancy; and dental treatment on pregnancy/child’s health. Further, because the focus of this search was unfavorable beliefs during pregnancy, a study was only included if it included statements referred to as such. The original labelling of such statements in the source manuscript may have been “misbeliefs”, “myths” and/or “false information”, but the labelling of the truth or false nature of such beliefs is largely subjective. Therefore, we have used the term “unfavorable beliefs” as a cumulative term throughout this paper.

The exclusion criteria included: 1) only assessed the knowledge of pregnant women regarding the child’s oral health and 2) assessed the beliefs or knowledge of dentists, midwives, gynecologists, and other health care providers.

Data extraction and risk of bias assessment

Data were extracted by one reviewer (YMK) and then verified by a second reviewer (NMZ) using a standard form on Microsoft Excel (Version 16.70). The main collected data pertained to the studies’ characteristics including author, year of publication, country and region, study design, population, data collection tool, sample size, and response rate. Data on statements identified as misbeliefs and the prevalence of the participants believing in each statement were also extracted. Risk of bias in each study was assessed by utilizing five domains of the CLARITY tool, 1) representativeness of the source population, 2) adequacy of the response rate, 3) the proportion of missing data, 4) comprehensiveness, clarity, and face validity of the survey, and 5) reliability and construct validity of the survey [18].

Data synthesis

Since the main purpose of this study was the identification of common unfavourable beliefs about oral health and dental service utilization during pregnancy, data were synthesized through narrative discussion. According to the objectives of this review and due to the wide variety of reported beliefs in the included studies, no meta-analysis could be undertaken. More importantly, the included studies were descriptive in nature and provided no further information than the range and/or the prevalence of the existing unfavourable beliefs among different populations of pregnant women.

Results

The flow diagram of study identification and selection is presented in Fig. 1. In total, 5766 studies were identified through database searching (n = 4676) and forward and backward citation tracing (n = 1090), out of which 1183 were removed due to duplication. After title screening was conducted, 159 studies remained. Full-text review of these and consideration of the inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in 45 studies included in the review.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA diagram of study identification and selection

Full size image

Characteristics of the included studies

Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the 45 studies which were included. All studies were cross-sectional in design. Sixteen studies used interviewer-administered questionnaires as a tool for data collection, two [11, 19] conducted semi-structured focus groups and interviews, and the other 29 studies gathered data using self-administered questionnaires. Six studies were qualitative [11, 19,20,21,22,23]. The oldest study was published in 1984 [24], and the newest ones were published in 2022 [25,26,27,28,29]. Sample sizes ranged from 19 in a qualitative study [21] to 801 in a quantitative study [29].

Table 1 Summary of the studies which met the inclusion criteria to investigate common oral health-related unfavourable beliefs during pregnancy
Full size table

Risk of bias assessment

Figure 2 shows the summary of findings from the risk of bias (RoB) assessment of the included studies. Only two studies [35, 56] had a low RoB in all five domains. A domain was marked as “No information” for a study if the related information was not exactly provided by the authors. The “probably yes” and “probably no” answers were combined and marked as “Intermediate” risk of bias. The “comprehensiveness, clarity, and face validity of the survey” and “reliability and construct validity of the survey” were the most common risks of bias with 16 (36%) and 13 (29%) of the studies having a high RoB in these domains, respectively. 16 (36%) studies did not provide information about the sampling method 21 (47%) studies recruited their samples through non-random (consecutive, convenience, and purposive) sampling, resulting in an intermediate risk of bias. Almost half (53%) of the studies did not report the response rate; however, this rate was more than 75% in 14 (31%) of the studies. Regarding missing data, 33 (73%) of the studies had a low risk of bias. A detailed RoB assessment of each study is presented in Additional file 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Summary of risk of bias assessment of the included studies using the CLARITY tool

Full size image

More than one hundred uniquely worded unfavourable beliefs were identified. However, many of these are equivalent and simply differently worded. These words can be grouped into four main categories of unfavourable beliefs about: 1) utilization of dental services (Table 2); 2) specific dental treatment procedures (Table 3); 3) oral health conditions (Table 4); and 4) other oral health-related unfavourable beliefs (Table 5). Due to the variety of how different studies worded their questions and labelled statements (as knowledge, attitude, misbelief, perception, myths, view, and misconception), for consistency purposes, the word “unfavourable beliefs” is used throughout this review. The original statements and their prevalence can be found in Additional file 4.

Table 2 Unfavourable beliefs about utilization of dental services during pregnancy
Full size table
Table 3 Unfavourable beliefs about the impact of specific dental treatment procedures on pregnancy
Full size table
Table 4 Unfavourable beliefs about the impact of pregnancy on oral health
Full size table
Table 5 Other oral health-related unfavourable beliefs during pregnancy
Full size table

Unfavourable beliefs about utilization of dental services

Table 2 presents unfavourable beliefs around two domains: that dental treatment is unsafe or should be avoided; or that dental visits should be avoided during pregnancy due to unsafety or unnecessity. Gupta et al. [39] reported these as two distinct beliefs; therefore, all other statements about these two domains are separately shown. These were discussed in 35 studies, for which 12 indicated that the belief that dental treatment was unsafe is one of the barriers to dental utilization [25, 30,31,32, 36,37,38, 52, 54, 55, 57, 59].

Unfavourable beliefs about specific dental treatment procedures

Table 3 presents unfavourable beliefs about specific dental treatment procedures.

X-rays and exposure to radiation

Twelve studies reported concerns about radiation exposure in dental clinics. The study by Murphey [22] identified a belief regarding the harmfulness of dental X-rays to the fetus, which was considered to be a false belief. Similarly, a qualitative study by Bahramian and colleagues [11] identified the belief that radiography could cause miscarriage; the authors of the study considered it to be a “misbelief”. Other studies cited in Table 3 reported the prevalence of unfavourable beliefs regarding adverse pregnancy outcomes due to dental X-rays exposure which ranged from 31% [50] to 93% [27].

Dental anesthesia and medication

Eight studies reported the unfavorable belief among pregnant women that dental anesthesia was hazardous, with the prevalence of this belief ranging from 25% [12] to a high of 95% [45] of participants in different studies. In a study by Bahramian et al. [11], an interviewee believed that anesthesia causes miscarriage. In four studies, participants were reported to believe that medications pertinent to dental treatments, such as pain medications, should be avoided because of harm to the fetus or mother [11, 20, 27, 45].

Dental extraction

Seven studies discussed dental extraction during pregnancy. One of the common beliefs identified by Jain et al. [12] and Akbari et al. [29] was that tooth extraction causes miscarriage. In one qualitative study [23], and four other quantitative studies, pregnant women believed that dental extraction is contraindicated and harmful. When reported, the prevalence of the belief that extraction is a harmful dental practice ranged from 6% in a study by Assery [42] to more than 80% of the respondents in three other studies [26, 28, 51].

Other dental treatments

Routine dental treatment procedures such as dental fillings, calculus removal, and periodontal therapy were perceived to be unsafe by participants in four quantitative studies [26, 28, 42, 45]. In qualitative studies, concerns about bacterial infection of the baby due to bleeding from dental check-ups were also stated. Some participants expressed potential environmental sources of harm including dental clinics exposing their fetuses to bacteria, materials and chemicals used in dental offices [20, 22].

Unfavourable beliefs about oral conditions during pregnancy

Table 4 presents unfavourable beliefs regarding the impact of pregnancy on oral health.

Tooth loss

Eighteen studies discussed tooth loss and pregnancy. In five studies participants were specifically asked if they held unfavourable belief in the given statement/s “a tooth per child” [24, 30, 35, 36, 59] while in two other qualitative studies, participants indicated an unfavourable belief that “at least one tooth is lost or destroyed in each pregnancy” [11, 21]. This belief was assessed through various other statements as shown in Table 4. The prevalence of beliefs about tooth loss were notably different; in a study by Kaba et al. in Kenya [28] 86% of participants unfavourably believed that pregnancy causes tooth loss while in the study by Awasthi et al. [58], no one attested to this belief.

Periodontal and gingival problems

As shown in Table 4, in 10 studies, participants believed that pain in gums, bleeding or swollen gums are normal occurrences and need no special consideration [12, 28, 29, 39, 45, 53], or that pregnancy is a cause of periodontal problems [24, 34, 42, 53, 58].

Other oral conditions

Although not so common, some women perceived toothache [20, 21, 45] or tooth decay as normal occurrences in pregnancy [24, 42, 45].

Other unfavourable beliefs

One of the most commonly held beliefs during pregnancy was that calcium is absorbed from the teeth by the developing fetus. At least 37% of the participants had this perception in the study of Assery [42] and the study of Abdalla et al. [46] had the highest proportion of participants with this belief (80%). One qualitative study attributed the uncomfortable tooth sensation to “yeet hay” (internal heat) which could be solved by consuming herbal tea [20]. Another belief reported by adolescent pregnant mothers in the US was that the colour of the food in mothers’ diets is associated with the appearance of their babies’ teeth. They believed that eating white ice cream during pregnancy can cause white teeth in the baby and having beans and meat in the diet can cause an unhealthy appearance of the teeth [22].

Three studies showed that pregnant women believed that teeth should not be brushed during pregnancy or after delivery (from a few days to a few weeks) [12, 29, 39]. The reasons they did not brush their teeth either during or right after pregnancy were that they were not allowed by family members, or it is not good for the baby’s health, or it makes the teeth loose [12]. Other myths and misconceptions reported in the included studies are shown in Table 5.

Discussion

Our study aimed to identify commonly held unfavourable beliefs about oral health and dental treatment during pregnancy. Understanding unfavourable beliefs about oral health and dental treatment, as well as understanding factors associated with those beliefs, is important to create risk-based preventative intervention and oral health awareness during pregnancy. This systematic review revealed unfavourable beliefs about the association of pregnancy with oral health, the safety of dental care, different dental treatment, and oral hygiene practices. This discussion will summarize those findings within the context of the potential consequences of unfavourable beliefs and oral health-related information resources.

Out of a total of 45 included, the majority of the studies reported unfavourable beliefs about the utilization of dental care during pregnancy, irrespective of the type of dental treatment. In two studies more than half of the participants believed that visiting a dentist even for regular check-ups is not safe and should be avoided during pregnancy [48, 50]. Evidence suggests that such beliefs can prevent pregnant women from seeking timely dental treatment during pregnancy which can impact the overall well-being and oral health-related quality of life of pregnant women [31].

Our review identified unfavourable beliefs regarding the safety of specific dental procedures such as the use of local anesthetics, medication prescription, dental radiography, restorative procedures, and periodontal treatment. Women’s concerns regarding dental radiographs were the most discussed dental procedure in the included studies. This belief can be due to a lack of awareness about the safety of dental radiography among pregnant women and their healthcare providers [62]. With low doses of radiation (ALARA as low as reasonably achievable) [63, 64] and additional safety measures such as lead aprons and thyroid collars, dental radiographs are considered safe for all stages during pregnancy [65]. Not being adequately informed about the safety of dental treatments, pregnant women may choose to postpone receiving dental care until after delivery without knowing the adverse effects of untreated oral conditions such as odontogenic infection [66].

In the included studies, unfavourable beliefs about oral conditions during pregnancy were also widely held, with the old saying “a tooth per child” being one of the most prevalent ones. Although there is no causal link between parity and tooth loss [67, 68], some studies on this association showed that women with more children had more missing teeth [69,70,71,72]. Russell et al. concluded that the cumulative destructive impact of untreated periodontal diseases due to lack of access to preventative periodontal care can contribute to tooth loss and may explain this association [70].

Our results highlighted that gum diseases and dental caries were considered ‘normal’ during pregnancy and that pregnancy was believed to ‘cause’ these oral diseases. One possible explanation for these beliefs is that pregnant women may experience periodontal problems due to hormonal changes [73,74,75], frequent nausea and vomiting, and altered oral hygiene and snacking behaviours which makes them susceptible to oral conditions such as tooth decay and gingival conditions [76]. Experiences of oral conditions during previous pregnancies may also lead to such beliefs. For example, those who experienced tooth cavities in their previous pregnancy stated that it is ‘normal that at least one tooth be destructed in this period’ [11]. Therefore, it is recommended by the American Dental Association that pregnant women should seek preventative dental care during pregnancy [77].

In almost one-third of the included studies, the belief that calcium is absorbed from teeth by the fetus’s development and that calcium loss results in tooth problems were reported; however, there is no evidence to support such beliefs. A study on mineral concentrations of extracted teeth showed no difference between calcium concentrations of pregnant and non-pregnant women’s teeth [78]. In fact, the higher dental caries and tooth loss experience may relate to physiological alterations and behavioural changes such as frequent snacking and altered oral hygiene [79]. Behavioural modification including preventative dental screening, a healthy diet, avoiding frequent snacking and limiting the frequency of sugar consumption can effectively prevent dental caries during pregnancy [80, 81].

In regard to unfavourable beliefs about oral hygiene, in three studies, participants believed that tooth brushing should be ‘avoided’ during and after pregnancy [12, 29, 39]. In one of these studies, participants stated family influence or fear of brushing being harmful to their teeth or babies as the reasons for such belief [12]. This finding contradicts the evidence that encourages regular oral hygiene practices during and after pregnancy [79]. However, tooth brushing should be avoided after vomiting as it increases the risk of tooth erosion [82]. Nevertheless, both personal and professional preventative modalities such as toothbrushing, dental flossing, using mouthwash, and regular dental visit and checkups are considered safe during pregnancy [79].

Our review identified several environmental and individual contributing factors in relation to oral health-related unfavourable beliefs and dental service utilization during pregnancy. Economic status was shown to be positively associated with higher knowledge scores [50, 56] and negatively associated with the belief that dental treatment is not safe during pregnancy [31]. Similarly, in many studies, higher education level was found to be a protective predictor of low oral health knowledge [28, 33, 49, 50, 56]. Other predictors of better maternal oral health knowledge include having children [28, 49], older age [49], and routine dental visits prior to pregnancy [31]. Race and ethnicity were examined in a few studies; however, no significant association between oral health knowledge with education, ethnicity, and level of employment was reported in at least one study [54]. These inconsistent findings can be explained by the variety of questions the authors of different studies asked the participants for assessing oral health knowledge and the inconsistency among studies in categorizing a specific statement as knowledge or attitude.

Implications of oral health-related unfavourable beliefs on prenatal care

Unfavourable beliefs about oral health can have consequences such as avoidance of dental treatment and dental service utilization [10]. Dinas et al. found that women who considered dental treatment to be unsafe during pregnancy were less likely to visit a dentist [31]. Unfavourable beliefs may also contribute to oral health conditions which can be due to dental care avoidance or improper oral hygiene [58, 83]. In a study by Jain et al. [12], a significant positive correlation was observed between having dental conditions (conditions were not specified by the authors) and beliefs pertaining to avoiding dental visits during pregnancy. Delayed dental care-seeking behaviour can lead to the progression of dental conditions and complications such as odontogenic abscess, facial cellulitis, severe pain, and tooth loss [80, 84]. These complications can adversely impact pregnancy outcomes and the overall well-being of pregnant women including nutrition, sleep time, and mental health [66, 85].

Clinical implications

Our review identified that oral health literacy was directly associated with presumed myths and unfavourable beliefs [86]. Therefore, it is important to engage pregnant women in delivering evidence-based oral health education [87]. Pregnancy is the best time to bring about positive behavioural change in women [88]. A study by Erchick et al. [89] concluded that pregnant women were more likely to adopt their oral hygiene intervention as it has a direct impact on the health of the fetus and newborn. Although no studies have examined the association between the level of oral health knowledge and the source of such knowledge during pregnancy, some studies reported that culture, elder family members and peers from participants’ networks, including friends, are the origins of such beliefs [12, 22, 23]. Surprisingly, healthcare professionals have also been reported as a source of misinformation regarding oral health [90, 91]. This finding highlights the importance of integration of primary oral healthcare knowledge and prevention in the primary healthcare model. A study by George et al. [92] in Australia engaged midwives in delivering oral health education to pregnant women. Similarly, Ragade et al. [93] and Adeniyi et al. [94] actively engaged primary healthcare workers in preventative oral health interventions in the United States and Canada, respectively. Integration of oral health education within the primary care delivery model can significantly help to reduce and dismantle commonly held misbeliefs during pregnancy [92]. The wide range of existing unfavourable beliefs regarding oral health during pregnancy emphasizes the importance of integrating preventative and primary oral healthcare services in routine prenatal care. Furthermore, it underscores the importance of enhancing the oral health expertise of primary healthcare practitioners and disseminating this knowledge to expectant mothers through oral health educational interventions during prenatal care sessions. These interventions should be focused on the individualized and risk based oral health needs of pregnant women and their soon to be born babies.

Limitations of the included studies

Several limitations were identified in the reviewed studies. In most of the studies, authors did not distinguish between knowledge and attitude which resulted in using these two concepts interchangeably. Further, a quarter of the included studies did not elaborate on the process of developing their survey questionnaires and the sampling method was not reported in almost one-third of the studies. Only seven studies had a random sampling method which ensured the representativeness of the sample while a majority of the studies incorporated a convenience sampling method which limits the external validity of the findings. Further, recruiting the subjects from a specific clinic or hospital, either public or private, resulted in a homogenous sample.

Limitations of the review

Although this study is the first of its kind to attempt a systematic review of commonly held oral health beliefs during pregnancy and to discuss the contributing factors and consequences, the findings should be considered in light of the limitations. Since our review included both qualitative and quantitative studies, we were unable to separate our findings based on the study design. Some beliefs were only reported by a single individual in a qualitative study henceforth the generalizability of these misbeliefs is not guaranteed. The prevalence of the beliefs was not compared according to the country or region; however, this objective did not seem feasible given the large variety of reported beliefs. Further studies could assess differences in beliefs among pregnant women from various cultures and with different socioeconomic statuses. Furthermore, this review limited the population to pregnant women and new mothers; unfavourable beliefs among healthcare providers could be systematically explored in future studies to see if any implementation for improving the oral health knowledge of these groups is required.

Conclusions

This systematic review revealed that unfavourable beliefs regarding oral health during pregnancy and dental care still exist and are held in many geographic locations. Oral health and dental care unfavourable beliefs may result from a lack of information and oral health awareness by pregnant women and their primary care providers. Pregnant women actively seek information related to their baby’s health and are at risk of obtaining wrong information from different sources such as media and social networks. Healthcare providers should ensure their own, and their patients’ knowledge of oral health and dental care during pregnancy is up to date. Avoiding dental treatment due to misinformation and unfavourable beliefs can lead to untreated dental conditions related to adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia, preterm birth and low birth weight. Therefore, preventative oral healthcare services and education should be integrated into the primary care model during pregnancy.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Abbreviations

RoB:

Risk of Bias

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis

PROSPERO:

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews

References

  1. Misra R, Kaster EC. Health Beliefs. In: Loue S, Sajatovic M, editors. Encyclopedia of Immigrant Health. New York: Springer New York; 2012. p. 766–8. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-5659-0_332 [cited 18 Jul 2023].

  2. Kaufman E, Lagu T, Hannon NS, Sagi J, Rothberg MB. Mythmaking in medical education and medical practice. Eur J Int Med. 2013;24(3):222–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2012.12.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dai E, Sun Y, Wang S. Ginger cannot cure cancer: battling fake health news with a comprehensive data repository. Proc Int AAAI Conf Weblogs Soc Media. 2020;26(14):853–62. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Demoulin C, Gabriel L, Nève de Mévergnies O, Henket L, Roussel N, Goubert L, et al. Several low back pain‐related misbeliefs are still around in 2020: a cross‐sectional survey in Belgium. Physiotherapy Res Intl. 2022;27(1). Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pri.1927 [cited 7 Sep 2022].

  5. Okunlola MA, Lamptey E, Senkyire EK, Dorcas S, Dooshima BA. Perceived myths and misconceptions about the novel COVID-19 outbreak. SciMed J. 2020;2(3):108–17. https://doi.org/10.28991/SciMedJ-2020-0203-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scherer LD, McPhetres J, Pennycook G, Kempe A, Allen LA, Knoepke CE, et al. Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? A test of four psychosocial hypotheses. Health Psychol. 2021;40(4):274–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pan W, Liu D, Fang J. An examination of factors contributing to the acceptance of online health misinformation. Front Psychol. 2021;1(12):630268. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke PE, Gross H. Women’s behaviour, beliefs and information sources about physical exercise in pregnancy. Midwifery. 2004;20(2):133–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2003.11.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peadon E, Payne J, Henley N, D’Antoine H, Bartu A, O’Leary C, et al. Women’s knowledge and attitudes regarding alcohol consumption in pregnancy: a national survey. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):510. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-510.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagaraj A, Ganta S, Yousuf A, Pareek S. Enculturation, myths and misconceptions regarding oral health care practices among rural female folk of Rajasthan. Stud Ethno-Med. 2014;8(2):157–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09735070.2014.11917630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bahramian H, Mohebbi SZ, Khami MR, Quinonez RB. Qualitative exploration of barriers and facilitators of dental service utilization of pregnant women: a triangulation approach. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1773-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jain L, Juneja R, Kansal R, Kumar V. Prevalence of myths regarding oral health among pregnant women in North India. Int J Dent Hyg. 2021;19(1):127–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. López R. Periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Is periodontal disease associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes? Evid Based Dent. 2008;9(2):48–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400581.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shanbhag S, Dahiya M, Croucher R. The impact of periodontal therapy on oral health-related quality of life in adults: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(8):725–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01910.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moher D. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Babineau J. Product review: covidence (Systematic Review Software). J Can Health Libr Assoc. 2014;35(2):68. https://doi.org/10.5596/c14-016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Githens PB, Glass CA, Sloan FA, Entman SS. Maternal recall and medical records: an examination of events during pregnancy, childbirth, and early infancy. Birth. 1993;20(3):136–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.1993.tb00438.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lansche J. Risk of bias instrument for cross-sectional surveys of attitudes and practices. Available online: http://www.distillersr.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Risk-of-Bias-Instrument-for-Cross-Sectional-Surveys-of-Attitudes-and-Practices-DistillerSR.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2023.

  19. Lubon AJ, Erchick DJ, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Agrawal NK, Reynolds MA, et al. Oral health knowledge, behavior, and care seeking among pregnant and recently-delivered women in rural Nepal: a qualitative study. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0564-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu PP, Wen W, Yu KF, Gao X, Wong MCM. Dental care-seeking and information acquisition during pregnancy: a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(14):2621. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Al Khamis S, Asimakopoulou K, Newton JT, Daly B. Oral health knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pregnant kuwaiti women: a qualitative study. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2016;1(3):211–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2380084416665075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Murphey C. Oral health experiences of pregnant and parenting adolescent women: a qualitative descriptive study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(6):768–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.07.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Detman LA, Cottrell BH, Denis-Luque MF. Exploring dental care misconceptions and barriers in pregnancy. Birth. 2010;37(4):318–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00427.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jago JD, Aitken JF, Chapman PJ. Dental knowledge and behaviour of pregnant women attending a Brisbane maternity hospital, 1982. Community Health Stud. 1984;8(1):45–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.1984.tb00423.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Azarshahri A, Rainchuso L, Vineyard J, Giblin-Scanlon L. Postpartum U.S. women’s oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices during pregnancy. Matern Child Health J. 2022;26(6):1339–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03326-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gavic L, Maretic A, Putica S, Tadin A. Attitudes and knowledge of pregnant women about oral health. J Educ Health Promot. 2022;11:77. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_382_21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Javali MA, Saquib SA, Abdul Khader M, Khalid I, AlShahrani AY, Kanji MA, et al. Oral health knowledge, attitude, and practice of pregnant women in Deccan, South India: a cross-sectional prenatal survey. J Med Life. 2022;15(3):420–4. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2019-0095.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaba P, Chelegat D, Ochiba L. Knowledge, attitude and barriers to maternal oral health among expectant mothers at a tertiary hospital in Western Kenya. In Review; 2022. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1409708/v1 [cited 9 Aug 2022].

  29. Akbari RP, Setiawati F, Maharani DA. Belief in myths about oral health among Indonesian mothers. J Int Dent Medical Res. 2022;15(3):1286–9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Al Habashneh R, Guthmiller JM, Levy S, Johnson GK, Squier C, Dawson DV, et al. Factors related to utilization of dental services during pregnancy. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(7):815–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00739.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dinas K, Achyropoulos V, Hatzipantelis E, Mavromatidis G, Zepiridis L, Theodoridis T, et al. Pregnancy and oral health: utilisation of dental services during pregnancy in northern Greece. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(8):938–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340701371413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Saddki N, Yusoff A, Hwang YL. Factors associated with dental visit and barriers to utilisation of oral health care services in a sample of antenatal mothers in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Boggess KA, Urlaub DM, Moos MK, Polinkovsky M, El-Khorazaty J, Lorenz C. Knowledge and beliefs regarding oral health among pregnant women. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142(11):1275–82. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Abiola A, Olayinka A, Mathilda B, Ogunbiyi O, Modupe S, Olubunmi O. A survey of the oral health knowledge and practices of pregnant women in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Afr J Reprod Health. 2011;15(4):14–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hashim R. Self-reported oral health, oral hygiene habits and dental service utilization among pregnant women in United Arab Emirates: Self-reported oral health among pregnant women. Int J Dent Hyg. 2012;10(2):142–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2011.00531.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ozen B, Ozer L, Basak F, Altun C, Açikel C. Turkish women’s self-reported knowledge and behavior towards oral health during pregnancy. Med Princ Pract. 2012;21(4):318–22. https://doi.org/10.1159/000334635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. George A, Johnson M, Blinkhorn A, Ajwani S, Ellis S, Bhole S. Views of pregnant women in South Western Sydney towards dental care and an oral-health program initiated by midwives. Health Promot J Austr. 2013;24(3):178–84. https://doi.org/10.1071/HE13040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Amin M, ElSalhy M. Factors affecting utilization of dental services during pregnancy. J Periodontol. 2014;85(12):1712–21. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.140235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gupta S, Jain A, Mohan S, Bhaskar N, Walia PK. Comparative evaluation of oral health knowledge, practices and attitude of pregnant and non-pregnant women, and their awareness regarding adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(11):ZC26-32. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/13819.6756.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Sajjan P, Pattanshetti JI, Padmini C, Nagathan VM, Sajjanar M, Siddiqui T. Oral health related awareness and practices among pregnant women in Bagalkot District, Karnataka. India J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(2):1–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Przeklasa A, Jakubik A, Szczeklik K, Pytko-Polończyk J. Pregnant women’s awareness of dental care with regard to prophylaxis of oral diseases. J Stomatol. 2015;68(6):690–702. https://doi.org/10.5604/00114553.1190066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Assery MK. A 22year comparison survey of dental knowledge in Al-Jubail antenatal clinic population. Saudi Dent J. 2016;28(2):86–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2016.01.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Nagi R, Sahu S, Nagaraju R. Oral health, nutritional knowledge, and practices among pregnant women and their awareness relating to adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2016;28(4):396–402. https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaomr.JIAOMR_246_15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gaffar BO, El Tantawi M, Al-Ansari A, AlAgl AS. Association between oral health knowledge and practices of Saudi pregnant women in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. East Mediterr Health J. 2016;22(6):411–6. https://doi.org/10.26719/2016.22.6.411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gonik B, Wilson E, Mayberry M, Yuki JB. pregnant patient knowledge and behavior regarding perinatal oral health. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34(7):663–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Abdalla NMA, Emam EAE, El-Malek ASA, Masoud AMO. Knowledge, attitude and practices of women regarding oral and dental health care during pregnancy. Minia Sci Nurs J. 2017;2(1):57–68. https://doi.org/10.21608/msnj.2017.187723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Abel-Aziz NR, Fawaz MA, El-Sharkawy NB. Pregnant women beliefs on the impact of oral/dental health on pregnancy outcomes. Med J Cairo Univ. 2017;85(7):2821–9.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Khalaf SA, Osman SR, Abbas AM, Ismail TAAM. Knowledge, attitude and practice of oral healthcare among pregnant women in Assiut, Egypt. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5(3):890. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20180743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Barbieri W, Peres SV, Pereira CD, Peres Neto J, Sousa MD, Cortellazzi KL. Sociodemographic factors associated with pregnant women’s level of knowledge about oral health. Einstein (São Paulo). 2018;16(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082018ao4079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hammad O, Binsaad S, Gasim R, Jambi S, Haidary R, Afandi A, et al. Assessing expectant mothers’ knowledge and beliefs about oral healthcare during infancy and pregnancy: a cross sectional survey in Saudi Arabia. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatr Clín Integr. 2018;18(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2018.181.66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ishaq Z, Rasul F, Ahmaed A, Tanveer S. Knowledge, attitude and practices of pregnant females regarding oral health. Pak J Med Health J. 2018;12(4):1556–9.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gupta N, Chhetry M. Knowledge and practices of pregnant women regarding oral health in a tertiary care Hospital in Nepal. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2019;57(217):184–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Hans M, Hans V, Kahlon N, Ramavat PR, Gupta U, Das A. Oral health awareness and practices in pregnant females: a hospital-based observational study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019;23(3):264. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_372_18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Rafeek R. The perceived oral health status, practices, knowledge and periodontal status of pregnant women in a maternity hospital in Trinidad. Acta Sci Dent Sci. 2020;4(11):74–83. https://doi.org/10.31080/ASDS.2020.04.0966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Barman D, Ranjan R, Kundu A. Factors associated with dental visit and barriers to the utilization of dental services among tribal pregnant women in Khurda district, Bhubaneswar: a cross-sectional study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019;23(6):562–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_704_18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Llena C, Nakdali T, Sanz JL, Forner L. Oral health knowledge and related factors among pregnant women attending to a primary care center in Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(24):5049. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245049.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kamaruddin MAS, Samsudin NA. Oral health knowledge and practices of antenatal mothers in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia. 2020;5(3):131. https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.45958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Awasthi MS, Awasthi KR, Saud B, Adhikari B, Koirala SKR, Ghimire MG, et al. Oral and dental care practices and attitude of pregnant women in Lalitpur, Nepal. Int J Nurs Health Sci. 2020;2(1):10–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Soegyanto AI, Larasati RN, Wimardhani YS, Özen B. Mother’s knowledge and behaviour towards oral health during pregnancy. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatr Clin Integr. 2020;20:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2020.113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Riaz A, Javed MQ, Chaudhary FA, Khan AM. Knowledge, attitude, and practices of pregnant women regarding oral health at railway hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Pakistan J Med Health Sci. 2020;14(4):738–43.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Chinenye-Julius AE, Omeonu PE, Akinsola K. Knowledge, attitude and practices of oral hygiene among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Nigeria: evidence from Ogun State. Afr J Health Sci. 2021;34(1):44–54.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Vieira DRP. Dentists’ knowledge of oral health during pregnancy: a review of the last 10 years’ publications. Community Dent Health. 2015;32(2):77–82. https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_3403Vieira00.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Okano T, Sur J. Radiation dose and protection in dentistry. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2010;46(2):112–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2009.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Committee Opinion No. 723. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):216.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Oral Health Care During Pregnancy and Through the Lifespan | ACOG. Available from: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2013/08/oral-health-care-during-pregnancy-and-through-the-lifespan. [cited 30 Oct 2022].

  66. Pucci R, Cassoni A, Di Carlo D, Della Monaca M, Romeo U, Valentini V. Severe odontogenic infections during pregnancy and related adverse outcomes. Case report and systematic literature review. Tropical Med. 2021;6(2):106. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed6020106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Scheutz F, Baelum V, Matee MIM, Mwangosi I. Motherhood and dental disease. Community Dent Health. 2002;19(2):67–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wysokińska-Miszczuk J. Effect of the number of pregnancies on the condition of the teeth in older women. Wiad Lek. 1987;40(14):964–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Oziegbe EO, Schepartz LA. Association between parity and tooth loss among northern Nigerian Hausa women. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021;174(3):451–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Russell SL, Ickovics JR, Yaffee RA. Exploring potential pathways between parity and tooth loss among American women. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(7):1263–70. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.124735.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Ueno M, Ohara S, Inoue M, Tsugane S, Kawaguchi Y. Association between parity and dentition status among Japanese women: Japan public health center-based oral health study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):993. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-993.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Halling A, Bengtsson C. The number of children, use of oral contraceptives and menopausal status in relation to the number of remaining teeth and the periodontal bone height. A population study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden. Community Dent Health. 1989;6(1):39–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kornman KS, Loesche WJ. The subgingival microbial flora during pregnancy. J Periodontal Res. 1980;15(2):111–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1980.tb00265.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Tsai CC, Chen KS. A study on sex hormones in gingival crevicular fluid and black pigmented bacteria in subgingival plaque of pregnant women. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi. 1995;11(5):265–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Straka M. Pregnancy and periodontal tissues. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2011;32(1):34–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Kloetzel MK, Huebner CE, Milgrom P. Referrals for dental care during pregnancy. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2011;56(2):110–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-2011.2010.00022.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Pregnancy | American Dental Association. Available from: https://www.ada.org/resources/research/science-and-research-institute/oral-health-topics/pregnancy. [cited 19 Feb 2023].

  78. Deakins M, Looby J. Effect of pregnancy on the mineral content of dentin of human teeth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1943;46(2):265–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(15)32919-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Yenen Z, Ataçağ T. Oral care in pregnancy. J Turkish German Gynecol Assoc. 2019;20(4):264–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(15)32919-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Silk H, Douglass AB, Douglass JM, Silk L. Oral health during pregnancy. Am Acad Fam Physician. 2008;77(8):1139–44.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Jevtic M, Pantelinac J, Jovanovic-Ilic T, Petrovic V, Grgic O, Blazic L. The role of nutrition in caries prevention and maintenance of oral health during pregnancy. Med Pregl. 2015;68(11–12):387–93. https://doi.org/10.2298/MPNS1512387J.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Robb ND, Smith BG, Geidrys-Leeper E. The distribution of erosion in the dentitions of patients with eating disorders. Br Dent J. 1995;178(5):171–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808695.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Jessani A, Laronde D, Mathu-Muju K, Brondani MA. Self-perceived oral health and use of dental services by pregnant women in surrey, British Columbia. J Can Dent Assoc. 2016;82:g28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Weise H, Naros A, Weise C, Reinert S, Hoefert S. Severe odontogenic infections with septic progress – a constant and increasing challenge: a retrospective analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0866-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Kim EG, Park SK, Nho JH. Factors related to maternal oral health status: focus on pregnant and breastfeeding women. Healthcare. 2021;9(6):708. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060708.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Nasir Z, Ahmed W, Iqbal F, Iqbal S, Saba A, Tariq M. Prevalence of social myths and taboos related to dental health among general population of Rawalpindi - Pakistan. Pak Oral Dent J. 2014;34(3):520–3.

    Google Scholar 

  87. NickbinPoshtamsary S, EmamiSigaroudi A, Farmanbar R, Radafshar G, AtrkarRoushan Z. The effect of educational intervention based on the health belief model on oral and dental health behavior in pregnant women. J Holist Nurs Midwifery. 2020;30:182–90. https://doi.org/10.32598/jhnm.30.3.1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Olander EK, Darwin ZJ, Atkinson L, Smith DM, Gardner B. Beyond the ‘teachable moment’ – a conceptual analysis of women’s perinatal behaviour change. Women Birth. 2016;29(3):e67-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Erchick DJ, Agrawal NK, Khatry SK, Katz J, LeClerq SC, Reynolds MA, et al. Adherence to and acceptability of three alcohol-free, antiseptic oral rinses: a community-based pilot randomized controlled trial among pregnant women in rural Nepal. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020;48(6):501–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12562.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Wagner Y, Heinrich-Weltzien R. Midwives’ oral health recommendations for pregnant women, infants and young children: results of a nationwide survey in Germany. BMC Oral Health. 2016;18(16):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0192-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. George A, Johnson M, Duff M, Ajwani S, Bhole S, Blinkhorn A, et al. Midwives and oral health care during pregnancy: perceptions of pregnant women in south-western Sydney. Austr J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(7–8):1087–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03870.x. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. George A, Dahlen HG, Blinkhorn A, Ajwani S, Bhole S, Ellis S, et al. Evaluation of a midwifery initiated oral health-dental service program to improve oral health and birth outcomes for pregnant women: a multi centre randomised controlled trial. In J Nurs Stud. 2018;82:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Ragade A, Yiannis C, Opie CA. Oral healthcare attendance and the effectiveness of referrals for rural antenatal women. Aust J Rural Health. 2022;ajr.12907. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12907.

  94. Adeniyi A, Donnelly L, Janssen P, Jevitt C, Von Bergmann H, Brondani M. An interprofessional model of care for oral health during pregnancy. J Interprof Care. 2022;11(8):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.2017417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Samantha Vettraino, Western University Libraries, for her assistance with developing the search strategy for this systematic review.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, 1465 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6G 2M1, Canada

    Yasaman Mohammadi Kamalabadi, M. Karen Campbell, Natalie M. Zitoun & Abbas Jessani

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, 800 Commissioners Rd. E., London, ON, Canada

    M. Karen Campbell

  3. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, 800 Commissioners Rd. E., London, ON, Canada

    M. Karen Campbell

  4. Children’s Health Research Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, 750 Base Line Rd. E., London, ON, N6C 2R5, Canada

    M. Karen Campbell

  5. Department of Dentistry, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, Dental Sciences Building, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada

    Abbas Jessani

Authors
  1. Yasaman Mohammadi Kamalabadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Karen Campbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Natalie M. Zitoun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abbas Jessani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YMK: Conceptualization, methodology, title and full-text screening, data extraction, quality assessment, study design, resources, original draft writing. N.M.Z: Title and full-text screening, data extraction, quality assessment, manuscript review and editing. M.K.C: Conceptualization, validation, study design, manuscript review and editing, supervision, and project administration. A.J: Conceptualization, validation, study design, manuscript review and editing, supervision, and project administration. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbas Jessani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

PRISMA checklist.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Search Strategy.

Additional file 3: Figure S1.

Risk of bias assessment for each included study using the CLARITY tool.

Additional file 4: Table S3.

Original statements and their prevalence in each included study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamalabadi, Y.M., Campbell, M.K., Zitoun, N.M. et al. Unfavourable beliefs about oral health and safety of dental care during pregnancy: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health 23, 762 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03439-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03439-4

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us