Skip to main content
Download PDF

Age and sex related change in tooth enamel thickness of maxillary incisors measured by cone beam computed tomography

BMC Oral Health volume 23, Article number: 971 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To measure adequate enamel thickness of maxillary incisors in planning enamel reduction for a porcelain laminate veneer restoration in relation to chronological age and sex by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in an Iraqi subpopulation.

Methods

From 81 CBCT images, 324 maxillary incisors were examined. Enamel thickness was measured at both mesial and distal regions of the tooth in three different levels: cervical, middle, and incisal (occlusal) 1/3 at a sagittal section. Measurements were made for the following tooth areas using CBCT: facial enamel thickness at 1, 3, and 5 mm from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), palatal enamel thickness at 5 mm from the CEJ (5 mm P), facial and palatal enamel thickness at the incisal edge (IFP), mid incisal enamel thickness (IET), and the incisal edge enamel-pulp distance (IEPD). Relationships of enamel thickness with age and sex were evaluated using Independent t-test, Mann–Whitney U-test and the Pearson correlation coefficient, a simple linear regression analysis used for statistical analysis.

Results

Significant differences (P < 0.05) were found in terms of an inverse association between enamel thickness and chronological age at all measurements above the CEJ and the regression model for the mid-incisal enamel thickness was (R2 of 0.4). In contrast, there was an increase in IFP, palatal, and IPED enamel thickness with age. Also, significant differences were found in enamel thickness between males and females, the enamel being thicker in females in relation to facial enamel thickness, enamel palatal thickness above CEJ and IET, while for IEPD, the enamel thickness was greater in males compared to females.

Conclusion

The measurements for enamel thickness outcome variables in relation to chronological age revealed significant differences for each measured distance and there were statistically significant differences in enamel thickness between males and females at all measurements except at IFP. These results demonstrate that CBCT can be used for noninvasive, accurate measurements of enamel thickness in both sex.

Peer Review reports

Background

Tooth enamel thickness plays a significant role in the bonding of the restoration to the tooth structures, strength of the restoration, tooth color, and biological tooth condition [1, 2]. However, the dentist’s knowledge is a significant factor in planning the amount of tooth reduction for a porcelain laminate veneer (PLV) restoration. With the introduction of resin-bonded ceramics and advances in the production of adhesive systems, cosmetic dentistry with minimal preparation design has become a viable treatment approach.

Color stability, adhesion durability to enamel, and meeting patients’ esthetic demands with less trauma are the major advantages of resin bonded ceramics. An optimal bonded veneer restoration can be obtained, especially if the preparation is located completely in the enamel, as long as accurate adhesive treatment techniques are carried out and suitable resin cement is selected [2,3,4]. It is essential to limit tooth preparation within the enamel and provide adherence of the minimally invasive resin-bonded ceramic restoration to enamel to avoid failure [3]. It is necessary to consider preparation within the enamel vs no preparation in order to increase the fracture resistance of the veneered restorations [1]. Increased enamel thickness increases the failure load necessary to cause catastrophic failure in the porcelain veneer [4]. Porcelain bonded to enamel has shown much higher fracture strength than porcelain bonded to dentin. The 0.5-mm thick porcelain bonded to enamel has demonstrated higher fracture strength than 1.0-mm thick porcelain bonded to dentin [5]. Enamel thickness is a statistically significant predictor of tooth color change. Enamel thickness has an impact on tooth color, which may inspire researchers and dentists to create restorative materials that closely resemble the color of natural teeth while preserving as much of the current enamel as possible [6]. The enamel hardness (H) and Young’s modulus (E) at the enamel surface are H > 6 GPa and E > 115 GPa, while these measurements change at the enamel-dentin junction to H < 3 GPa and E < 70 GPa. These changes correspond to changes in the prism alignment and chemistry that relate to enamel depth [7].

Available data on the dimensions of the tooth enamel structure, as well as their relationship with the aging process, is limited [8]. Accurate enamel thickness measurement before tooth preparation can reduce the risk of over preparation of the dentin. Different methods are used to measure the enamel or dentin thickness: physical sections, lateral flat plane radiographs method, Radiographic grid method, Digital radiographic technique superimposed with radiolucent grid lines, computer-generated mCT sections, Optical coherence tomography (OCT), and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) [8,9,10]. The lateral flat plane radiograph method is considered inadequate for measuring enamel thickness accurately [11]. CBCT is a new medical imaging technique introduced that generates 3-D images at a lower cost and absorbed dose compared with conventional computed tomography (CT). CBCT has the potential to be an accurate, non-invasive procedure [12]. Although dental measurements from CBCT volumes provide quantitative analysis with a small systematic error, an adjustment for this error allows for improved accuracy [13].

To the authors’ knowledge, one study used CBCT to assess the relationship between enamel thickness and age, but did not take into account how sex would affect that relationship [14]. Therefore, the aim of this study is to measure adequate enamel thickness of maxillary incisors in relation to chronological age and sex by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in an Iraqi subpopulation.

Methods

Study design

This study was designed as a retrospective study and carried out at a single Private Oral Radiology Center in Sulaimani city Kurdistan Region/Iraq in the period from 2/20/2021 to 2/1/2022. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Of Sulaimani College Of Dentistry (No. 152/23; date 29.3.2023).

Study sample

Three hundred and twenty four maxillary incisor teeth (numbers 11,12,21,22) (132 male and 192 female) from 81 CBCT images were selected from 950 CBCT images. All of the selected sample satisfied the following inclusion criteria: individual aged over 16 years and with all maxillary incisors present, sound teeth, without caries, without root canal therapy or fracture and fully erupted. The exclusion criteria included the following: current orthodontic treatment, prosthetic crowns of maxillary incisors, inflammatory periapical lesions, supernumerary teeth, foreign bodies or previous surgery of the anterior maxilla and inferior technical quality of the scans (incorrect exposure settings, low image resolution, motion artefacts and incomplete coverage of the maxillary incisors).

CBCT measurements

All CBCT images were acquired with a Carestream 9600 (CARESTREAM DENTAL, FRANCE). Technical specifications were as follows: 10 cm spherical imaging volume, 75μmx5μmx5μmx isotropic voxel size, and a field of view of 10 cm diameter. The CBCT radiographs were taken according to the following parameters: 120 kV, 8 mA, and exposure time of 20 s by CS 3D imaging software 1.9 (Carestream Dental). The CBCT images were examined using the built-in software package in an axial plane. If needed, image contrast and brightness were adjusted for optimal visualization.

Sagittal profile section of the midline was selected for each tooth and 7 points were selected for measuring the enamel thickness as shown in (Table 1 and Fig. 1).

Table 1 Reference points for enamel thickness measurement and their abbreviations
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Sagittal section of the maxillary central incisor with tooth landmarks used for enamel thickness measurement

Full size image

The standard consistency test (Kappa Value)

All the images were evaluated by two observers retrospectively. At the same time as the reliability test, a routine consistency check (kappa value) of the results was performed. Reliability was rated unqualified when the kappa value was 0.4, moderate when the kappa value was between 0.41 and 0.6, excellent when the kappa value was between 0.61 and 0.8, and totally dependable when the kappa value was between 0.81 and 1.0 [15].

Statistical analysis

The data were summarized by the use of descriptive statistics. To evaluate the relationship between thickness and age, a quadratic regression model was used. Shapiro–Wilk test was used to determine the normality distribution of the samples regarding the sex and type of tooth. Independent t-test was used for normally distributed data, and Mann–Whitney u test was used for the data that were not normally distributed. Two-way ANOVA was used to assess the interaction between age and sex. Statistical analyses were done with statistical software (SPSS 26.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill).

Results

The score from analysis of inter-examiner reliability was 0.87, indicating total dependability of the study. Descriptive statistics of the measurements are presented in (Table 2).

Table 2 Descriptive statistics of enamel thickness (mm)
Full size table

The age of the samples was ranged from (14 to 68) years old with a mean age of (35.6 ± 12).

The hypothesis tests if age carries a significant impact on enamel thickness. The results were not normally distributed according to Shapiro Wilk statistic test; therefore, a quadratic regression was used to follow the negative skewness and kurtosis of the data. The dependent variable (age) was regressed on predicting variable(enamel thickness on the selected points) to test the hypothesis H1.Age significantly predicted enamel thickness on point(1mm F) F(2,321) = 21.763, p < 0.001.The beta coefficient is positive in age and negative in age2, which indicate that increase in age lead to decrease in enamel thickness on point (1mmF) (inverse relationship).While the R2 = 0.143 depicts that the model explains 14.3% of the variance in point(1mmF). Table 3 shows the summery of the finding.

Table 3 Results of regression analysis
Full size table

The regression analysis revealed significant differences (P < 0.05) in all of the relationships between enamel thicknesses and age (Table 3). Outcome variables of enamel thickness in relation to age were represented as coefficients of determination (R2).

The results of the analysis revealed an inverse relationship between enamel thickness and chronological age at (1mm F, 3mm F, and 5mm F, respectively), with the same finding obtained for IET, which was the best fit in the regression model (R2 of 0.4) (Fig. 2 A, B, C, D). Meanwhile, an increase was observed in the IEPD, 5mm P, and IFP in relation to age (Fig. 2 E, F, G).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Scatter plots for actual measurements and predicted values (line of best fit) of enamel tooth thickness (horizontal axis) versus age (vertical axis); A 1 mm F; B 3 mm F; C 5 mm F; D: IET; E IEPD; F 5 mm P and G IFP

Full size image

According to the Shapiro–Wilk normality test; only the IFP group was normally distributed; therefore, the independent t-test was used. Since the other groups were not normally distributed, the Mann–Whitney u test was used for these groups.

Regarding facial-enamel thickness, at 1,3,5 mm above CEJ, 5mm P, and IET, there was a statistically significant difference in enamel thickness between males and females, with thicker enamel found in females (Table 4).

Table 4 Differences in outcome variables in relation to sex
Full size table

Regarding the IEPD, the distance was greater in males in comparison to females, and this difference was statistically significant. For IFP there was no significant difference between males and females (Table 4).

According to the Shapiro–Wilk normality test, none of the outcome variables were normally distributed; therefore, Mann–Whitney u test was used for all groups. There was a statistically significant difference in facial enamel thickness 5 mm above CEJ, IET, and IFP, with the enamel being thicker in lateral incisors in comparison to central incisors. However, regarding the IEPD the enamel was thinner in lateral incisors compared to central incisors (P < 0.001). Regarding the other outcome variables, no significant difference was observed between the central and lateral incisors (Table 5).

Table 5 Differences in outcome variables in relation to the type of tooth
Full size table

Since there were statistically significant differences between the sex, the regression analysis performed separately by sex as seen Table 6.

Table 6 The regression analysis of the effect of age on the enamel thickness for both sexes
Full size table

Although there are minor changes in the ANOVA(F) values between male and female, but all the results are still significant in relation to age (as seen in the p value of the ANOVA test in Table 6). As for betta coefficient, there is a negative relationship between enamel thickness and chronological age at (1 mm F, 3 mm F, and 5 mm F, and IET), Meanwhile, an increase in enamel thickness in relation to age was observed in the point IEPD, 5 mm P, and IFP for both sexes.

To calculate the interaction between age and sex, and to conduct two-way ANOVA, the sample’s age was divided into three age groups: group 1(16–30), group 2(31–50), and group 3(51–68). Significant difference in age-sex interaction at IEPD and IFP groups (Table 7).

Table 7 Two-way ANOVA of the transformed data to assess the age-sex interaction
Full size table

Discussion

There is limited information on the micrometric enamel thickness for tooth preparations considering age and sex of the study population. Ferrari et al. [16] measured the thickness of enamel using a laboratory caliper of 10 maxillary central incisors, but without considering chronological age. Other studies used SEM to measure enamel thickness in human extracted maxillary central incisors for a population with an age range of 35 to 70 years [8, 17]. Miyagi et al. [18] used optical coherence tomography to verify the precision of enamel thickness measurements of maxillary central and lateral incisors, again without considering sex or age. Pahlevan et al. [18] investigated the thickness of enamel only at the gingival, middle and incisal thirds of the labial surface of extracted maxillary incisors teeth, using stereomicroscopy, without considering age and sex. Belgın et al. [19] examined enamel thicknesses and maximum cervical crown widths of 15 extracted premolar teeth using both Micro-CT and periapical radiographs; Akli et al. [20] measured the enamel thickness of extracted 32 maxillary canine using microcomputed tomography scans, without age and sex characterization; while Feeney et al. [21] employed microtomography to virtually image, section, and quantify the average enamel thickness of a sample of clinically extracted Indonesian canine and premolar teeth in a study that compared males and females.

Only two studies have used CBCT to measure enamel thickness. Brokos et al. [14] examined in vivo the possible variations in enamel thickness among upper anterior teeth using 3D CBCT data, but in only 24 patients aged from 21 to 75 years and without sex consideration, while a study by Salam et al. [22] evaluated enamel thickness of the mandibular canine and mandibular first molar for sexual dimorphism in an Egyptian population sample using CBCT.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first retrospective study that has correlated age with sex to measure enamel thickness in maxillary incisor teeth using CBCT in planning for minimizing enamel reduction in a porcelain laminate veneer restoration.

In the present study, CBCT was used to measure enamel thickness as it is a nondestructive high resolution three dimensional diagnostic procedure, with rapid scan time and low radiation dose, and is therefore proposed as an alternative method of accurate measuring dental tissue thickness [10, 23].

Because maxillary central incisors are the teeth cited in clinical research as most frequently receiving porcelain laminate veneer restoration [24,25,26], central and lateral incisors were employed in the current investigation to analyze enamel thickness.

Comparable measurements from earlier studies [8, 17, 24, 27] were taken of the thickness of the facial enamel, and the results showed that, contrary to what other authors have suggested, an enamel reduction of 0.5 mm, which is considered the ideal depth for porcelain laminated veneers, may expose dentin at the cervical area. The enamel layer is thought to have the strongest ceramic bonding to teeth. Clinically, when veneers are only partially adhered to dentin, the likelihood of failure increases. As a result, because tooth reduction in the cervical region usually goes beyond the boundaries of enamel tissue, this has been identified as a problem [16, 28].

Based on the findings from this investigation, increasing the enamel thickness from cervical to incisal (0.58 mm, 0.79 mm, and 0.99 mm, at 1, 3, and 5 mm above CEJ, respectively) and achieving a mean thickness of enamel at incisal edge of 1.03 ± 0.4 requires consideration during tooth reduction if the completed preparation is to remain in the enamel. The results obtained from this study showed thicker enamel in the Iraqi subpopulation at all measurements on the facial surface above CEJ and at incisal edge. Other studies [8, 26, 29] have noted that preparation depth may be in the range of 0.3 to 0.7 mm and 0.79 ± 0.03 at incisal edge and these differences may be related to the method of enamel thickness measurement.

The tooth preparation techniques for PLVs [24,25,26] have been carried out without consideration of age or sex. In the current study, a regression model was used to predict a tooth's thickness depending on the individual's age. This will allow a clinician to know approximately how much tooth thickness is available for reduction when restoring a tooth for a veneer.

The findings of the current study indicate that with advancing of age, tooth enamel thickness decreased at 1, 3, and 5 mm above the CEJ and IET. This raises the possibility of dentin exposure, which could make the bond less reliable, and these results are comparable with other studies [8, 14]. The mean enamel thickness of the IEPD in the current study utilizing CBCT was 5.2 ± 1.06 and seemed to be comparable to the data previously published for the age range of 30 to 69 years [8, 30].

This study also found that 5 mm P height increased with increasing chronological age. Reduction in the size of the pulp chamber with aging may be the cause of this rise [31]. According to this study's findings, wear and attrition caused the maximal IFP to rise with advancing years. This could be explained by the shape of human incisor teeth, which have a greater cross-section area at the CEJ than the incisal edge. As people age, the thinner incisal section wears down, increasing the maximum incisal-palatal width at the incisal edge.

The results of the current investigation demonstrated that sex is a factor that affects enamel thickness since, with the exception of IEPD, females displayed higher values of enamel thickness than males in all dimensions. A similar finding was observed by Brokos et al. [14] and this may be related to lower masticatory forces in females, which may help to prevent enamel erosion. However, other studies [21, 22] reported that males have significantly greater enamel thickness measurements, dentin area and enamel–dentin junction length than females and these sex differences may be attributed to variations in type of teeth, ethnic population and methods of measurement.

In regard to differences in enamel thickness between maxillary central and lateral incisors, in contrast to the IEPD, which was thinner in lateral incisors compared to central incisors, there was a statistically significant difference in facial enamel thickness 5 mm above CEJ, IET, and IFP, where the enamel was thicker in lateral incisors compared to central incisors (P < 0.001). These results align with those reported by Brokos et al. [14], who found that the mean values of enamel thickness for permanent central and lateral incisors were very similar (CI: 734μm, LI: 745μm), which can be explained by the fact that they emerge into the mouth at roughly the same time and have roughly the same length of development time (7–9 years).

To address the limitations of the present study, the use of a larger sample of the Iraqi subpopulation and different types of teeth could lead to a better understanding of how enamel thickness varies in relation to chronological age and sex.

Conclusions

This study concluded that CBCT scanning allows reliable accurate nondestructive measurement of enamel thickness. It can also be concluded that age and sex both affect enamel thickness; enamel thickness of maxillary incisors decreases with advancing age, while enamel in lateral incisors was found to be thicker in females except in the case of IEPD.

Availability of data and materials

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uR10M_-AsaKEcam1RVaCp7RPDFt0oTpB/edit?usp=share_link&ouid=115884346681842745188&rtpof=true&sd=true.

Abbreviations

CBCT:

Cone beam computed tomography

CEJ:

Cemento-enamel junction

P:

Palatal

IFP:

Facial and palatal enamel thickness at the incisal edge

IET:

Mid incisal enamel thickness

IEPD:

Incisal enamel pulpal distance

References

  1. Mohamed M. Effect of preparation depth on the fracture resistance of two monolithic ceramic laminate veneers. Egypt Dent J. 2022;68(3):2509–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhu J, Gao J, Jia L, Tan X, Xie C, Yu H. Shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers to finishing surfaces with different percentages of preserved enamel under a digital guided method. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burke FT. Survival rates for porcelain laminate veneers with special reference to the effect of preparation in dentin: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24(4):257–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ge C, Green CC, Sederstrom D, McLaren EA, White SN. Effect of porcelain and enamel thickness on porcelain veneer failure loads in vitro. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(5):380–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Piemjai M, Arksornnukit M. Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems. J Prosthodont. 2007;16(6):457–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oguro R, Nakajima M, Seki N, Sadr A, Tagami J, Sumi Y. The role of enamel thickness and refractive index on human tooth colour. J Dent. 2016;51:36–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuy JL, Mann AB, Livi KJ, Teaford MF, Weihs TP. Nanoindentation mapping of the mechanical properties of human molar tooth enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 2002;47(4):281–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Atsu SS, Aka PS, Kucukesmen HC, Kilicarslan MA, Atakan C. Age-related changes in tooth enamel as measured by electron microscopy: Implications for porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(4):336–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aparna Trivedi, Shivangi Trivedi, Swati Chhabra, Abhishek Bansal, Archana Jain, Pradeepta Kaushal, et al. "It doesn’t matter what lost what matter is what remains” R.D.T (Remaining Dentin Thickness): A review. J Pharm Negat Results. 2022;13(S01). Available from: https://pnrjournal.com/index.php/home/article/view/1047/829. [Cited 2022 Dec 2].

  10. Olejniczak AJ, Grine FE. Assessment of the accuracy of dental enamel thickness measurements using microfocal X-ray computed tomography. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2006;288A(3):263–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grine FE, Stevens NJ, Jungers WL. An evaluation of dental radiograph accuracy in the measurement of enamel thickness. Arch Oral Biol. 2001;46(12):1117–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Plotino G, Grande NM, Pecci R, Bedini R, Pameijer CH, Somma F. Three-dimensional imaging using microcomputed tomography for studying tooth macromorphology. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(11):1555–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(1):19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brokos YP, Stavridakis M, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Evaluation of enamel thickness of upper anterior teeth in different age groups by Dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scan, in vivo. Int J Adv case reports. 2015;2(23):1396–409.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Talabani RM, Abdalrahman KO, Abdul RJ, Babarasul DO, Hilmi KS. Evaluation of Radix Entomolaris and Middle Mesial Canal in Mandibular Permanent First Molars in an Iraqi Subpopulation Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Biomed Res Int. 2022;11(2022):7825948. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7825948. PMID:35860794;PMCID:PMC9293536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrari M, Patroni S, Balleri P. Measurement of enamel thickness in relation to reduction for etched laminate veneers. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 1992;12:407–13.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kedici P, Atsu S, Gokdemir K, Sarikaya Y, Gurbuz F. Micrometric measurements by scanning electron microscope (SEM) for dental age estimation in adults. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2000;18:22–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pahlevan A, Mirzaee M, Yassine E, Ranjbar Omrany L, Hasani Tabatabaee M, Kermanshah H, Arami S, Abbasi M. Enamel thickness after preparation of tooth for porcelain laminate. J Dent (Tehran). 2014;11(4):428–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Belgın CA, Serindere G, Orhan K. Accuracy and reliability of enamel and dentin thickness measurements on micro-computed tomography and digital periapical radiographs. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2019;18:32–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Akli E, Araujo EA, Kim KB, McCray JF, Hudson MJ. Enamel thickness of maxillary canines evaluated with microcomputed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;158(3):391–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Feeney RNM, Zermeno JP, Reid DJ, Nakashima S, Sano H, Bahar A, Hublin JJ, Smith TM. Enamel thickness in Asian human canines and premolars. Anthropol Sci. 2010;118(3):191–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Salam E, khalifa A, Hassouna D. Odontometric analysis using CBCT for sexual dimorphism in Egyptian-Fayoum population in case of normal occlusion. Egypt Dent J. 2021;67:1319–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang Y, He S, Yu L, Li J, Chen S. Accuracy of volumetric measurement of teeth in vivo based on cone beam computer tomography. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011;14(4):206–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cherukara GP, Seymour KG, Samarawickrama DY, Zou L. A study into the variations in the labial reduction of teeth prepared to receive porcelain veneers– a comparison of three clinical techniques. Br Dent J. 2002;192:401–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brunton PA, Aminian A, Wilson NH. Tooth preparation techniques for porcelain laminate veneers. Br Dent J. 2000;189:260–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cherukara GP, Seymour KG, Zou L, Samarawickrama DY. Geographic distribution of porcelain veneer preparation depth with various clinical techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:544–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Garber DA. Rational tooth preparations for porcelain laminate veneers. Compendium. 1991;12:316–8 320.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu H, Zhao Y, Li J, Luo T, Gao J, Liu H, Liu W, Liu F, Zhao K, Liu F, Ma C, Setz JM, Liang S, Fan L, Gao S, Zhu Z, Shen J, Wang J, Zhu Z, Zhou X. Minimal invasive microscopic tooth preparation in esthetic restoration: a specialist consensus. Int J Oral Sci. 2019;11(3):31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Harley KE, Ibbetson RJ. Anterior veneers for the adolescent patient: 2 Porcelain veneers and conclusions. Dent Update. 1991;18:112–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stambaugh RV, Wittrock JW. The relationship of the pulp chamber to the external surface of the tooth. J Prosthet Dent. 1977;37:537–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Talabani RM, Baban MT, Mahmood MA. Age estimation using lower permanent first molars on a panoramic radiograph: A digital image analysis. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015;7(2):158–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the contribution of the Phantom Dental Center for providing CBCT scan with processing software.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Conservative Department, College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq

    Abdulsalam Rashid Al-Zahawi, Rawa Omar Ibrahim, Ranjdar Mahmood Talabani, Shilan Nawzad Dawood & Didar Sadiq Hama Garib

  2. Sulaymaniyah General Directorate of Health, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq

    Ako Omer Abdalla

Authors
  1. Abdulsalam Rashid Al-Zahawi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rawa Omar Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ranjdar Mahmood Talabani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shilan Nawzad Dawood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Didar Sadiq Hama Garib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ako Omer Abdalla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N.D.; A.R.A-Z.; Data curation, A.O.A, D.S.H; Formal analysis, D.S.H. Investigation, A.O.A, A.R.A-Z.; Methodology, S.N.D and R.M.T; Software, R.O.I and D.S.H; Supervision, A.R.A-Z.; Validation-Analysis, R.O.I.; Writing—original draft, R.M.T, A.R.A-Z; Writing—review & editing, S.N.D and R.O.I. All authors critically revised the manuscript and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shilan Nawzad Dawood.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Since this is a retrospective study, this chapter does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors, and the image of CBCT used was taken from a publicly available database after all patient information was de-identified and patient consent was not required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Zahawi, A.R., Ibrahim, R.O., Talabani, R.M. et al. Age and sex related change in tooth enamel thickness of maxillary incisors measured by cone beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health 23, 971 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03639-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03639-y

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us