Skip to main content
Download PDF

Three-dimensional evaluation of condylar morphology after orthodontic treatment in adult patients with Class II malocclusion by cone-beam computed tomography

BMC Oral Health volume 24, Article number: 48 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the condylar morphological changes after orthodontic treatment in adult patients with Class II malocclusion using a Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods

Images of twenty-eight adult patients with Class II malocclusion who have no temporomandibular symptoms were involved in this study. To analyze the post-treatment changes in condylar morphology, mimics 17.0 software was used to measure several values and reconstruct the three-dimensional condyle, including height of the condyle, area and bone mineral density of the maximum axial and sagittal section, volume and bone mineral density of the three-dimensional condyle and condylar head before and after orthodontic treatment. Using SPSS 19.0 software package Paired t-test was applied for comparison of condylar morphology analysis between pre-treatment and post-treatment.

Results

Height of condylar head increase significant (P < .05). Bone mineral density showed a decrease in the maximum axial and sagittal section, three-dimensional condyle and condylar head (P < .01). Evaluation of volume revealed that volume of both condyle and condylar head decrease considerably (P < .05). No significant difference was detected in other values ((P > .05).

Conclusion

Condylar volume decreased and height of condylar head have changed, so we speculated that adaptive bone remodeling of the condyle occurs.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The role of occlusal condition in the onset of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) has been strongly debated for many years and still is the source of controversy [1, 2]. Occlusion is often considered a major cause of TMD. Numerous etiological and therapeutic theories are based on this presumed association and have been applied to justify the use of several therapeutic approaches, such as occlusal splint [3]. Conversely, many TMD experts hold opposing views, and various kinds of dental interventions, including routine orthodontic treatment, have been reported as causes of TMD [4, 5].

Previous study reported that patients undergoing orthodontic treatment have more symptoms and signs of TMD in the time ranged [6]. Whereas, few studies investigated the mechanism underlying the relationship. The morphology of the condyle is strongly associated with joint function and temporomandibular joint disease [7,8,9].

In the orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusions, remodeling of the condyle frequently occurs on the articular surfaces of the TMJ to improve the position of the mandible relative to the maxilla [10,11,12,13].

However, detail condylar morphological changes after treatment still remains unclear. Thus, remodeling pattern of condylar morphology after orthodontic treatment could provide us with evidence about relationship between orthodontic treatment and TMD.

Condyle is anatomically a challenging structure to depict, for the reason of relatively low condylar bone density, diversified and complex morphology of condyles, proximity of the discus articularis and the overshadowing glenoid fossa [14]. Several studies have indicated that CBCT provides accurate and reliable linear measurements for reconstruction and imaging of dental and maxillofacial bony structures [15, 16]. With the aid of 3D CBCT reconstructions and superimpositions, both quantitative and qualitative analyses of condylar morphological changes could be accomplished [17].

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the morphological changes of condyle after orthodontic treatment in adult patients with Class II malocclusion.

Material and methods

Subjects

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Ningbo No.2 hospital. The 28 subjects involved in this study (7 males, 21 females; age 21.6 ± 7.9 years) presented with Class II malocclusion and were referred to the Orthodontic Center at Perfect Dental Care and the Department of Orthodontics, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University between January 2015 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) class II malocclusions with ANB larger than 3 degrees, (b) complete CBCT data were available at T0 and T1. Subjects were excluded if they presented skeletal asymmetries, unilateral posterior crossbite, articular noises at clinical examination (opening–closing), capsular or muscle pain, history of the orofacial trauma, articular systemic pathology, and history of orthodontic treatment. The average duration of treatment was 25 months.

Radiographic examination

Morphological changes of condyle were retrospectively evaluated on CBCT images that had been taken before and after orthodontic treatment.

Images of pre-treatment and post-treatment were taken in a standard orientation: the patients were sitting in an upright position, with the occlusion plane parallel to the ground. They were instructed to breathe peacefully and avoid swallowing during the scanning process.

CBCT datasets were acquired by using a CBCT scanner (Kodak 9500, Kodak Dental Systems, Carestream Health, Los Angeles, USA) with a reconstructed slice thickness of 0.5 mm. The device was operated at 15mAs and 90 kV. A single 360°degree rotation 24-second high-resolution scan was made with 18.4*20.6 cm field of view. The imaging data were exported as Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format and the DICOM files were loaded in MIMICS 17.0 (Materialise Dental, Leuven, Belgium).

Segmentation

The superior limit of the condyle was determined where the first radiopaque point appeared in the joint space (Fig. 1A, B); The inferior limit of condyle was determined when the sigmoid notch which is between the mandibular condyle and the coronoid process disappeared (Fig. 1C, D). After determination of the conture of interest (VOI), an appropriate greyscale cut-off value was manually selected by scrolling the coronal slices of the condyle so that the condyle contour was visualized. Using this greyscale cut-off value, the contour of VOI was enhanced automatically (Fig. 2A). Then, made a fine adjustments manually by shading or erasing the under-contoured and over-contoured voxels using the function of EditMask. (Fig. 2B) [18]. After the isolation, three-dimensional reconstructions were performed for each condyle using a Mimics tool of calculating 3D from a mask (Fig. 3A, B). The height, superficial area, and volume were measured on the 3-D models, as has been described in previous studies [14, 19].

Fig. 1
figure 1

The superior and inferior limit of condyle. A, B The superior limit of condyle is selected when the first white area appears in the upper articular region (B red arrow); C, D The inferior limit is selected when the sigmoid area disappears (D red arrow)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Image processing. A Selection of a suitable greyscale cut-off value for condyle and automatic segmentation of the condyle; B Manual refinement of the condylar contour on each sagittal slice

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Three-dimensional reconstruction. A Pretreatment; B Posttreatment images

Full size image

Quantitative assessment of condylar morphology

  1. a)

    Condylar Height: Distance from superior point to the maximum axial section define as condylar height1 (CH1); Distance from the maximum axial section to sigmoid notch plane define as condylar height2 (CH2); Distance from superior point to sigmoid notch plane define as condylar height2 (CH3)

  2. b)

    Sectional Area Measurements: To evaluate the subtle changes in condylar morphology, areas of maximum axial section(Ar1) and sagittal section(Ar2) were sliced.

  3. c)

    Bone Mineral Density: Bone mineral density (BMD) was automatically calculated in Housefield units (HU). BMD of the maximum axial section was defined as HU1; BMD of the maximum sagittal section was defined as HU2; BMD of 3D condyle was defined as HU3; BMD of 3D condylar head was defined as HU4.

  4. d)

    Volume: Volume of 3D condyle was defined as volume1(V1); Volume of 3D condylar head was defined as volume2(V2).

    To investigate the surface remodeling of the condylar head, pre-treatment and post-treatment segmented images were superimposed using both point registration and global registration techniques, employing the least root mean square method [20].

    In order to assess the reproducibility and reliability of accuracy of measurements, all CBCT images data were assigned by a random number. Two independent residents in oral and maxillofacial surgery carried out this process and measurement in a blinded manner. The process and measurements were repeated after an intervening period of 4 weeks. The Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate the measurement error. The results show higher intra-observer and inter-observer correlation coefficients (ICC > 0.9).

Statistical analysis

All testing was performed by the use of SPSS 22.0 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to determine the distribution of continuous variables. Continuous variables were expressed as means+standard deviation. Difference in measurements of Ar2 and Hu2 were analyzed using Wilcoxon test. A paired t test was used to analyzed differences in all the rest parameters between T0 and T1. The p value was set at 0.05.

Result

Condylar head height(H1) increased significantly post-treatment (P < 0.05, Table 1). BMD showed a significant decrease in the maximum axil section, the maximum sagittal section, 3D condyle and condylar head (P < 0.01, Table 2). Evaluation of volumetric measurements revealed that 3D condyle volume (P < 0.01, Table 3) and condylar head volume decreased significantly post-treatment (P < 0.05, Table 3). No significant difference was found in other measurements (P > 0.05, Tables 1, 4). Superimposed pre-treatment and post-treatment images showed both bone formation and resorption on the surface of condyle (Fig. 4).

Table 1 Condylar height change pre- and post-treatment (mm, \(\overline{x}\) ±s)
Full size table
Table 2 The mean bone density change pre- and post- treatment (Hu, \(\overline{x}\) ±s)
Full size table
Table 3 The volume change pre- and post-treatment (mm3, \(\overline{x}\) ±s)
Full size table
Table 4 Area of the largest axil plane change pre- and post- treatment (mm2, \(\overline{x}\) ±s)
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Superimposition of pre- and post-treatment models. Red region represented bone resorption; Blue region represented bone formation

Full size image

Discussion

In the present study, we have observed significant differences in the morphologic features of the condyle, which may offer valuable insights into condylar changes following orthodontic treatment. Condylar height is a crucial parameter for assessing condylar growth and development. In our investigation, we observed a significant increase in H1 post-treatment compared to pre-treatment, implying that the correction of distal occlusion may promote condylar growth, even in adult patients. However, differences in the area of the maximum axial and sagittal sections were not statistically significant between T0 and T1.

This study has demonstrated a significant decrease in condylar bone volume post-treatment. This indicates that condylar bone volume undergoes remodeling to adapt to changes in functional demands. Kurusu et al. [21] also noted that patients with low occlusal force tend to have smaller mandibular condyles, suggesting a correlation between occlusal force and condylar volume. In our investigation, both the volume of the 3D condyle and the condylar head decreased post-treatment. Prior studies have shown that occlusal force tends to decrease during the treatment period due to occlusal instability, with an increase expected during and after the retention phase [22, 23]. Therefore, the authors infer that the decrease in condylar bone volume may be associated with the reduction in occlusal force during treatment. As a result, condylar bone volume undergoes a remodeling process in response to changes in mechanical load. Further studies are necessary during the follow-up visits to investigate this phenomenon in more detail.

Bone mineral density (BMD) is a commonly used surrogate measure of mechanical competence and bone strength in both clinical and experimental contexts, expressed in terms of areal (aBMD) and volumetric (vBMD) measurements. In the current study, notable reductions in BMD were observed post-treatment. Chen et al. [24] discovered that a decrease in TMJ loading led to condylar cartilage loss and a transient reduction in the density of the mandibular condylar subchondral bone in mice. Furthermore, Teixeira et al.’s research revealed that dynamic loading stimulates remodeling of the mandibular condyle, potentially offering a treatment avenue for regenerating condylar cartilage and enhancing the impact of orthopedic appliances on mandibular growth [25]. It’s worth noting that the frequency of bone remodeling activation has a discernible effect on condylar BMD and its distribution [26]. Bone remodeling acts as a regulator of the degree of mineralization and the distribution of minerals at the tissue level, directly influencing the mechanical properties of bone [27]. Consequently, it can be inferred that the changes in BMD observed in our study result from the remodeling of the condyle induced by orthodontic treatment.

In our study, we utilized Hounsfield Units (HU) obtained from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as a reference for bone mineral density (BMD). It is worth noting that several studies have indicated that voxel values from CBCT images may not be reliable for BMD estimation due to potential influences from the imaging device and positioning [28]. In a standard CT scan, HU is directly proportional to the degree of X-ray attenuation and is assigned to each pixel, thus representing the tissue density in the image. While CBCT manufacturers and software providers often present grayscale values as HUs, it’s important to recognize that these measurements do not correspond to true Hounsfield Units. Nevertheless, some studies have suggested a strong linear correlation between grayscale values in CBCT and HUs in conventional CT scans under controlled conditions [29, 30]. In our study, we adhered to a standardized CBCT scanning protocol both before and after treatment, which should have maintained relatively reproducible grayscale values between the scans. Therefore, any differences in grayscale values between the scans could be attributed to changes in bone density.

In the current study, the parameters, patient position, and CBCT device remained consistent between the pre-treatment and post-treatment scans. Therefore, the grayscale value, used as an indicator of BMD, can be considered relatively reliable. Nevertheless, the precise nature of its relationship warrants further examination.

For a comprehensive assessment of condylar surface changes, the utilization of 3D reconstructed images and a superimposition method is indispensable. 3D surface images provide a more precise representation of condylar remodeling compared to conventional 2D images. In the current study, the superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment 3D reconstructed images revealed that both bone formation and bone resorption had transpired on the condyle’s surface. This suggests an ongoing adaptation process to the altered TMJ environment.

However, due to the absence of a control group, we were unable to exclude the potential influence of age on condylar morphology. During adulthood, the condyle frequently undergoes remodeling processes that can impact its morphology [31]. Studies by Pontual et al. [32, 33] have shown an increased prevalence of degenerative bone changes with advancing age. Furthermore, it’s worth noting that 75% of the subjects in our study were female, which could introduce an additional factor affecting condylar remodeling. Epidemiological data indicates a strong female predilection for Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD), with an estimated male-to-female ratio of approximately 1:3 in TMD patients [34]. This predisposition is believed to be associated with female reproductive hormones, especially estrogen. Previous research has revealed that estrogen signaling pathways play a role in regulating pregnancy-related TMJ homeostasis [35]. A reduction in bone density can lead to TMJ degeneration. Another study found that Era polymorphism had an impact on altered mandibular dimensions in female symptomatic TMJ osteoarthritis patients, suggesting that estrogen may contribute to TMJ bone remodeling [36]. Additionally, the follow-up duration was not sufficient to capture long-term, longitudinal changes in subchondral bone in response to orthodontic treatment. Hence, future investigations should explore these long-term changes. Moreover, the study was limited by the relatively small number of patients due to its retrospective design. A well-designed prospective study can overcome this problem.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study demonstrates a notable decrease in condylar bone volume and bone mineral density during the course of orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II malocclusion.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Kalladka M, Young A, Thomas D, Heir GM, Quek SYP, Khan J. The relation of temporomandibular disorders and dental occlusion: a narrative review. Quintessence Int. 2022;53(5):450–9. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b2793201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas DC, Singer SR, Markman S. Temporomandibular disorders and dental occlusion: what do we know so far? Dent Clin N Am. 2023;67(2):299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hua J, Fan X, Nie X, He D. Preliminary evaluation of Kovacs digital occlusal splint in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: a single-Centre, cross-sectional study. J Oral Rehabil. 2023;50(8):687–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coronel-Zubiate FT, Marroquín-Soto C, Geraldo-Campos LA, et al. Association between orthodontic treatment and the occurrence of temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14(12):e1032–43. Published 2022 Dec 1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Michelotti A, Rongo R, D'Antò V, Bucci R. Occlusion, orthodontics, and temporomandibular disorders: cutting edge of the current evidence. J World Fed Orthod. 2020;9(3S):S15–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang S, Xiao J, Wang GY, Gu ZY, Zhao HX. The relationship between orthodontic treatment and temporomandibular disorders. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2007;16(3):239–42.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Çamlıdağ İ, Sayıt AT, Elmalı M. Is condyle morphology a factor for anterior temporomandibular disc displacement? Turk J Med Sci. 2022;52(5):1609–15.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohamed HN, Ashmawy MS, Ekladious MEY, Farid MM. Analysis of the relationship between condylar changes and anterior disc displacement with reduction: a preliminary study. Oral Radiol. 2023;39(1):154–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roberts WE, Stocum DL. Part II: temporomandibular joint (TMJ)-regeneration, degeneration, and adaptation. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018;16(4):369–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koide D, Yamada K, Yamaguchi A, Kageyama T, Taguchi A. Morphological changes in the temporomandibular joint after orthodontic treatment for angle class II malocclusion. Cranio. 2018;36(1):35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nindra J, Sidhu MS, Kochhar AS, Dabas A, Valletta R, Rongo R, Spagnuolo G. Three-dimensional evaluation of condyle-glenoid Fossa complex following treatment with Herbst appliance. J Clin Med. 2021;10(20):4730.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Qin X, He Y, Zhang S, Jin N, Yang Z. Comparison of two different therapeutic approaches for skeletal class II patients with temporomandibular degenerative joint disease. Angle Orthod. 2023;93(1):49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Saleh MA, Alsufyani N, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Major PW. Changes in temporomandibular joint morphology in class II patients treated with fixed mandibular repositioning and evaluated through 3D imaging: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2015;18(4):185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xi T, Schreurs R, van Loon B, et al. 3D analysis of condylar remodelling and skeletal relapse following bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomies. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(4):462–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Babiker J, Affendi NHK, Yusof MYPM, Chu SJ. Qualitative and quantitative assessments of alveolar bone dimension and its correlation with tooth angulation in the anterior maxilla for immediate implant placement. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(11):1237–42. Published 2021 Nov 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Öztürk Kocak AT, Göller BD. Measurement of the trabecular bone structure of the TMJ region in patients with transverse maxillary deficiency: a CBCT fractal analysis study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2021;132(3):352–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Han K, Kim MC, Kim YJ, et al. A long-term longitudinal study of the osteoarthritic changes to the temporomandibular joint evaluated using a novel three-dimensional superimposition method. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):9389. Published 2021 Apr 30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Xi T, van Loon B, Fudalej P, Bergé S, Swennen G, Maal T. Validation of a novel semi-automated method for three-dimensional surface rendering of condyles using cone beam computed tomography data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42(8):1023–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. He Y, Lin H, Lin Q, et al. Morphologic changes in idiopathic condylar resorption with different degrees of bone loss. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;128(3):332–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2019.05.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. An SB, Park SB, Kim YI, Son WS. Effect of post-orthognathic surgery condylar axis changes on condylar morphology as determined by 3-dimensional surface reconstruction. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(2):316–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurusu A, Horiuchi M, Soma K. Relationship between occlusal force and mandibular condyle morphology. Evaluated by limited cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(6):1063–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Makino E, Nomura M, Motegi E, et al. Effect of orthodontic treatment on occlusal condition and masticatory function. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2014;55(4):185–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alomari SA, Alhaija ES. Occlusal bite force changes during 6 months of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Aust Orthod J. 2012;28(2):197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen J, Sorensen KP, Gupta T, Kilts T, Young M, Wadhwa S. Altered functional loading causes differential effects in the subchondral bone and condylar cartilage in the temporomandibular joint from young mice. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009;17(3):354–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Teixeira CC, Abdullah F, Alikhani M, et al. Dynamic loading stimulates mandibular condyle remodeling. J World Fed Orthod. 2022;11(5):146–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boivin G, Meunier PJ. Changes in bone remodeling rate influence the degree of mineralization of bone. Connect Tissue Res. 2002;43(2–3):535–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bala Y, Farlay D, Boivin G. Bone mineralization: from tissue to crystal in normal and pathological contexts. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(8):2153–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, Pauwels R, Jacobs R. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:873–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hakim SG, Glanz J, Ofer M, Steller D, Sieg P. Correlation of cone beam CT-derived bone density parameters with primary implant stability assessed by peak insertion torque and periotest in the maxilla. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019;47(3):461–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vitulli I, Fontenele RC, Nascimento EHL, Freitas DQ. Influence of artefacts generated by titanium and zirconium implants in the study of trabecular bone architecture in cone-beam CT images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022;51(6):20220066.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Safi AF, Kauke M, Grandoch A, Nickenig HJ, Zöller JE, Kreppel M. Age-related volumetric changes in mandibular condyles. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(2):510–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. dos Anjos Pontual ML, Freire JS, Barbosa JM, Frazão MA, dos Anjos PA. Evaluation of bone changes in the temporomandibular joint using cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41(1):24–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen PJ, Dutra EH, Mehta S, O'Brien MH, Yadav S. Age-related changes in the cartilage of the temporomandibular joint. Geroscience. 2020;42(3):995–1004.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L, Winocur E, Piccotti F, Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of axis I epidemiologic findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:453–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Robinson JL, Johnson PM, Kister K, Yin MT, Chen J, Wadhwa S. Estrogen signaling impacts temporomandibular joint and periodontal disease pathology. Odontology. 2020;108(2):153–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee DG, Kim TW, Kang SC, Kim ST. Estrogen receptor genepolymorphism and craniofacial morphology in female TMJ osteoarthritis patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35(2):165–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all the participants who contributed their time to complete this study.

Funding

Project of Ningbo Medical Science and Technology Plan, 2020Y09.

Project of Ningbo Leading Medical&Health Disciline, 2022-F20.

Hwamei Reasearch Foundation of Ningbo No.2 hospital, 2020HMZD03. Zhejiang Province Medical and Health Technology Project, 2024KY1561.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of stomatology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315010, China

    Qiutao Shi

  2. School of stomatology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, China

    Zhiyuan Gu

  3. Department of stomatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310005, China

    Danping Lai

  4. Department of Radiology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315010, China

    Qi Dai

  5. Orthodontic Center, Perfect Dental Care, Hangzhou, 310051, China

    Fengyang Yu

Authors
  1. Qiutao Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhiyuan Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Danping Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qi Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fengyang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Shi Qiutao, and Gu Zhiyuan contributed to conception and design of the study. Shi Qiutao, Lai Danping, Yu Fengyang and Dai Qi analyzed the data. Shi Qiutao, Lai Danping and Yu Fengyang were involved in interpretation of data. All authors contributed in drawing up and reviewing the preliminary versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiutao Shi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Ningbo No.2 Hospital. All the included patients gave their oral informed consent. The oral form of obtaining Informed Consent was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Ningbo No.2 Hospital. The protocol was performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations [Declaration of Helsinki].

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, Q., Gu, Z., Lai, D. et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of condylar morphology after orthodontic treatment in adult patients with Class II malocclusion by cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health 24, 48 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03728-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03728-y

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us