Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparative analysis of different types of occlusal splints for the management of sleep bruxism: a systematic review

BMC Oral Health volume 24, Article number: 29 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Sleep bruxism is a prevalent condition in dentistry practice, characterized by involuntary grinding or clenching of the teeth during sleep. Several therapies, including occlusal splints, have been used to manage sleep bruxism and temporomandibular disorders, including occlusal splints. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different occlusal splints in managing sleep bruxism.

Methods

The PICO framework encompasses the characterization of the population, intervention, comparison, and pertinent outcomes. A comprehensive and systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar to identify grey literature. The search specifically targeted scientific studies published before September 20, 2023. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool assessed the accuracy of the included Randomized Control Trials (RCTs). The modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale assessed non-randomized studies. Data were systematically extracted, synthesized, and reported thematically.

Results

Out of the total of 808 articles that were evaluated, only 15 articles were found to meet the specified inclusion criteria. Adjustable splints, such as full-occlusion biofeedback splints, were more effective in reducing sleep bruxism episodes, improving patient-reported symptoms, and enhancing overall well-being. The impact of different occlusal sprints on electromyographic activity varies, and potential adverse effects should be considered individually.

Conclusions

This review provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of occlusal splints in managing sleep bruxism. The results of this study indicate that occlusal splint therapy is a viable treatment approach for sleep bruxism.

Peer Review reports

Background

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are a group of conditions that cause pain and dysfunction in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and surrounding muscles [1]. TMDs are often associated with biomechanical issues such as malocclusion, in which the teeth are not properly aligned when the jaws are closed. TMD can also be caused by bruxism (long-term teeth grinding or clenching) and abnormal jaw growth patterns in children [2]. Sleep bruxism is commonly characterized by rhythmic or non-rhythmic grinding or clenching of the teeth while asleep [2, 3]. In otherwise healthy individuals, it is not considered a disorder but may be a risk factor for negative oral health consequences like TMD [4,5,6]. In the study by Dias et al. [7], sleep bruxism was reported with a 67.6% occurrence of degenerative changes in the temporomandibular joint. These changes lead to pain, stiffness, reduced range of motion, and clicking or popping sounds in the jaw [7,8,9]. Sleep bruxism is also reported to affect sleep patterns and the general quality of life [3, 10].

Several therapies, including occlusal splints, have been used to manage sleep bruxism and temporomandibular disorders, including occlusal splints [11]. Occlusal splints, often night guards, are dental appliances that function as protective barriers. Their primary purpose was to minimize the detrimental consequences of bruxism by obstructing tooth-to-tooth contact during sleep [11]. Various occlusal splints are available to accommodate individuals' specific requirements and preferences [12].

Occlusal or bite splints, used for the management of TMD, are typically made from materials like acrylic [11]. The splints provide a barrier between dental arches to minimize the impact of temporomandibular disorders. Since these disorders have adverse symptoms like pain, the cushioning effect of the splints helps improve comfort and minimizes accompanying symptoms [11, 13]. Splints are customized to suit the different needs of patients by taking impressions of patients' teeth, which are used to fabricate customized splints for specific bite patterns. Splints customization ensures optimal comfort and compliance [14].

Traditional acrylic splints are known to exhibit durability and can endure the stresses exerted during bruxism episodes [15]. Soft splints are often fabricated using soft substances such as silicone and are renowned for their exceptional comfort [16]. These splints provide a cushioning mechanism that mitigates the impact of clenching and grinding on the teeth and jaws [16]. There has been growing interest in using digital splints that include materials such as Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK), owing to their precise nature and the ability to customize them according to individual patients [15]. The production of these splints utilizes sophisticated digital technology that guarantees a customized fit that maximizes both comfort and efficacy [15].

Besides occlusal splints, there are other methods employed in TMD management. These include massaging muscles surrounding the jaw, Botox Injections, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), acupuncture, and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) [17,18,19,20,21]. Additionally, biofeedback has been used to manage TMD to help patients learn to control their masticatory muscle activity and reduce pain [22, 23]. Biofeedback can also help promote relaxation and regulate muscle tension [22, 24].

The rationale for conducting this systematic review was based on the need to assess and compare different occlusal splints used to treat sleep bruxism [12]. Sleep bruxism has oral health implications, including tooth wear, fractures, and orofacial discomfort, which require effective interventions [10]. The utilization of occlusal splints has emerged as a significant treatment modality. Nevertheless, various splints exist, each possessing distinct benefits and drawbacks [25]. This review aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of several occlusal splints in managing sleep bruxism. This would provide valuable insights for clinical practitioners and contribute to evidence-based decision-making in treating sleep bruxism.

The main objective of this systematic review was to comprehensively evaluate and consolidate the current body of literature to compare the effectiveness of different occlusal splints in treating sleep bruxism. It further aims to address the following research questions:

  1. i.

    What is the impact of different occlusal splints on reducing sleep bruxism episodes and improving symptoms?

  2. ii.

    How do various occlusal splints influence changes in electromyographic activity and patient-reported outcomes?

Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [26] were used to identify published studies that explored and compared different occlusal splints for managing sleep bruxism. The protocol used for this systematic review was the registered International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY) (20231000489). To examine the existing information on various types of occlusal splints, the PICO framework [27] was defined as follows:

  1. i.

    Population: Patients diagnosed with sleep bruxism.

  2. ii.

    Intervention: Usage of occlusal splints to treat sleep bruxism.

  3. iii.

    Comparison: Comparison between different types of occlusal splints.

  4. iv.

    Outcome: Effectiveness of occlusal splints in managing sleep bruxism.

The methodology employed for the comprehensive search of relevant literature

A detailed systematic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar for gray literature was performed for articles published before September 20, 2023. A search was conducted to identify scholarly articles that compared different types of occlusal splints for managing sleep bruxism. The following keywords were applied: ("Sleep bruxism" OR "Nocturnal teeth grinding" OR " teeth clenching") AND ("Occlusal splints "OR "Night guards" OR "Dental appliances" OR "Hard splints" OR "soft splints" OR "Occlusal splint"). The process involved the consideration of synonyms and alternative spellings. The search terms were extensively employed in numerous combinations across multiple databases.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Eligible studies included in this review met the following inclusion criteria: published in peer-reviewed journals; available in English; Studies that evaluated the effectiveness of different types of occlusal splints for the management of sleep bruxism; Studies conducted on human participants diagnosed with sleep bruxism; and studies that had clearly defined occlusal splint types and protocols for their use. Studies that did not meet the eligibility criteria were excluded from the analysis. These exclusions were based on the following reasons: the studies were in the form of reviews, meta-analyses, abstracts, or editorial articles; they lacked detailed descriptions of their methodology or results; they did not specifically investigate the comparison of various types of occlusal splints for the management of sleep bruxism; and they primarily focused on other interventions for sleep bruxism management, such as medication or behavioral therapies.

Study selection

After completing the initial search strategy, articles were selected using a systematic step-by-step procedure. The Zotero Reference Manager was utilized to eliminate duplicate research, including the remaining studies in the subsequent screening steps. A comprehensive review was conducted on all possible articles. The titles and abstracts underwent an initial screening process to exclude research that did not meet the eligibility criteria. The complete texts of the remaining articles were assessed using the predetermined criteria for inclusion and exclusion. The relevancy of articles that satisfied all the inclusion criteria was evaluated.

Risk of bias assessment

Eligible studies were critically checked for quality. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool assessed the accuracy of the included Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) [28]. The modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale assessed non-randomized studies [29].

Data analysis

The data from the research included in this analysis were systematically collected and summarized in Table 1. The results were thematically reported according to the prevalence and clinical presentation, electromyographic (EMG) activity changes and sleep bruxism episodes measured using polysomnography (PSG), BiteStrip®, and advanced EMG analysis. Quantitative data were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.4.1.

Table 1 Summary of study characteristics and outcomes [5, 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]
Full size table

Results

Study selection process

The database search resulted in 808 articles, from which 28 duplicate entries were subsequently eliminated. A total of 746 articles were eliminated through title and abstract screening. Thirty-four publications were obtained and evaluated to determine their suitability for inclusion in this study. A total of nineteen papers were excluded from the study due to their failure to satisfy the predetermined inclusion criteria. Fifteen publications were finally deemed appropriate for review after screening, as depicted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram for Systematic review with included searches of databases

Full size image

Methodological quality assessment

The outcomes were presented in traffic light plots and summary plots for critical appraisal of the studies, as shown in Figs. 2 and 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The critical evaluation of the studies is represented by a traffic light plot [5, 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Graph summarizing the findings from the studies' critical analyses

Full size image

Main study characteristics

Table 1 provides a summary of the study characteristics and outcomes. These studies were published between 1987 and 2023. The study comprised a sample size of 529 people. The majority of the research included in the analysis were RCTs. The participants were predominantly young adults with an age range of 18–40 years. Most studies have been conducted in Asian countries. Occlusal splints identified could be categorized as soft, complex, and adjustable.

Comparative analysis of different occlusal splint types

Occlusal splints have evolved as a multifaceted therapeutic intervention for various illnesses, including temporomandibular disorders and sleep bruxism. Multiple types of occlusal splints have different effects on managing sleep bruxism. The effectiveness of soft, rigid, and adjustable splints was analyzed using thematic analysis [30]. The dominant impacts of different occlusal splints were categorized into the following four groups:

Reduction in sleep bruxism episodes

Some studies have assessed the impact of different occlusal splints on sleep bruxism episodes and demonstrated mixed results in mitigating the frequency and severity of sleep bruxism. Harada et al. [31] examined the impact of stabilization and palatal splints on sleep bruxism. Both splints showed reduced bruxism immediately after insertion. However, this impact was temporary and did not persist beyond 2, 4, or 6 weeks [31]. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in the effect of a stabilization splint and palatal splint on sleep bruxism. Similarly, Dubé et al. [33] compared the effectiveness and safety of an occlusal splint and a palatal control device in individuals diagnosed with sleep bruxism. Both devices significantly reduced the frequency of sleep bruxism episodes per hour. Notably, no statistically significant difference in efficacy was observed between the two devices [33].

In contrast, Bergmann et al. [36] evaluated the efficacy of a full-occlusion biofeedback splint compared to an adjusted occlusal splint in treating sleep bruxism. The full-occlusion biofeedback splint group showed a decreased frequency and duration of bruxing events. After treatment cessation, the biofeedback group maintained a reduction in the burst duration. This suggests that the biofeedback splint effectively reduced sleep bruxism at the subconscious level and improved pain perception [36].

Changes in Electromyography (EMG) activity

Electromyographic recordings of masticatory muscles may provide valuable insights into the efficacy of different occlusal splints [11]. Lei et al. [37] investigated the effects of two occlusal splints that provide full coverage and a modified anterior splint on persons diagnosed with bruxism. The revised anterior splint demonstrated enhanced comfort and efficacy in reducing the occlusion force and electromyographic activity of the anterior temporalis and masseter muscles [37]. Conversely, Okeson [34] examined the effects of hard and soft occlusal splints on nocturnal muscle activity. The findings revealed that using rigid occlusal splints substantially reduced muscular activity in eight subjects. However, soft occlusal splints have contrasting outcomes. The procedure resulted in a significant decrease in muscle activity in one individual while conversely resulting in a statistically significant increase in muscle activity in five participants [34].

Moreover, de Paula Gomes et al. [35] investigated the effects of various treatments, including massage therapy, conventional occlusal splint therapy, and silicone occlusal splint therapy, on electromyographic activity in the masseter and anterior temporal muscles of individuals with sleep bruxism. Surprisingly, their findings demonstrated that neither massage nor occlusal splint therapy significantly impacted electromyographic activity. However, an intriguing discovery emerged when both therapeutic approaches were used in conjunction; there was a notable decrease in the severity of clinical manifestations observed in patients who were diagnosed with both severe temporomandibular disorder and sleep bruxism. This finding may provide promising insights for patients diagnosed with severe temporomandibular disorder and sleep bruxism, as the use of both therapeutic approaches simultaneously could potentially lead to improved outcomes.

Improvement in symptoms

Certain studies have investigated the symptom burden in persons with bruxism using different occlusal splints. The effectiveness of different occlusal splints in improving symptoms differed. De Paula Gomes et al. [35] examined the impact of several therapeutic interventions on the severity of clinical manifestations in patients diagnosed with sleep bruxism. They revealed that integrating massage, conventional occlusal splint, and silicone occlusal splint therapies decreased the severity of the patient's signs and symptoms. Bergmann et al. [36] showed that using a biofeedback splint increased patients' overall well-being and comfort.

Kolcakoglu et al. [38] investigated the efficacy of occlusal splint interventions in pediatric patients with nocturnal bruxism. The study discovered soft occlusal splints significantly reduced muscle discomfort and temporomandibular joint pain during palpation. Nevertheless, no statistically significant alteration was observed in the BiteStrip® score for either the soft or hard splint groups [38]. Dalewski et al. [32] assessed the efficacy of two distinct occlusal devices in individuals displaying symptoms indicative of bruxism. A comparable decrease in the pain factor was observed in both groups, irrespective of the gadget used.

Patient-reported outcomes and adverse effects

Certain studies have assessed patient-reported outcomes and adverse effects and found that different occlusal splints had different effects on patient-reported outcomes and adverse effects. For instance, Deregibus [42] compared the effectiveness of upper Michigan occlusal splints and mandibular occlusal splints in individuals diagnosed with muscle-related temporomandibular disorders. The findings revealed no significant reduction in pain over six months. Nevertheless, the presence of mandibular occlusal splints was shown to correlate with enhanced jaw mobility during lateral movements at designated time intervals. This implies that while occlusal splints may not substantially affect pain reduction, they may have a limited influence on enhancing jaw mobility in individuals with temporomandibular disorders [42].

Discussion

This systematic review presents a comparative examination of various occlusal splints utilized in managing sleep bruxism. This review demonstrated that adjustable splints, such as full-occlusion biofeedback splints, are more effective in reducing sleep bruxism episodes, improving patient-reported symptoms, and enhancing overall well-being. The impact of occlusal splints on electromyographic activity varies depending on the splint used and the individual's physiological reactions. Specific splints, such as the modified anterior splint, have shown greater efficacy in lowering muscle activity [37]. Conversely, soft occlusal splints have demonstrated varied outcomes. Therefore, the potential adverse effects should be considered on an individual basis. The selection of a splint should be well deliberated, considering individual requirements and preferences [44].

Critical analysis and synthesis of the results of multiple studies are essential for a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of occlusal splints in managing sleep bruxism. Bergmann et al. [36] showed that full-occlusion biofeedback splints effectively reduced sleep bruxism episodes. These results are consistent with previous research and the idea that splints may be an effective intervention to reduce the frequency of bruxism episodes during sleep [44].

Interestingly, other studies have shown no statistically significant differences in the impact of different splint devices on managing sleep bruxism [31, 33]. However, both splint devices significantly reduced the bruxism episodes upon their insertion. The lack of statistically significant differences may have been due to heterogeneity in the patient population. Bruxism is a complex condition influenced by stress, anxiety, and occlusal conditions. Including patients with varying degrees of bruxism may have affected their response to treatment.

De Paula Gomes et al. [35] and Kolcakoglu et al. [38] investigated sleep bruxism. They reported that improvement in the severity of signs and symptoms was associated with the use of combined therapies and soft occlusal splints. These findings highlight the possibility of integrating several therapies to mitigate the symptoms related to sleep bruxism and temporomandibular joint disorders [35]. Moreover, soft splints may more effectively mitigate symptoms in younger individuals diagnosed with bruxism [38]. In contrast, Dalewski et al. [32] discovered that Okeson's Stabilization Splint and Bimaxillary Splint had a comparable impact in reducing pain factors related to sleep bruxism. This implies that both splint designs can effectively alter the pressure pain threshold in patients diagnosed with bruxism [32].

Occlusal splints are also known to undergo changes over time. Their continuous contact with teeth during mastication and grinding leads to abrasion and changes in the splint's surfaces. The materials used in making both traditional and 3D-printed splints are also subject to aging. This is primarily due to exposure to oral fluids and temperature variations. Aging results in changes in the splints' mechanical and chemical properties, reducing their effectiveness [45]. The choice of the splint material thus plays a crucial role in determining splint longevity and performance. 3D-printed splints made of biocompatible polymers are preferred due to their proven stability in the oral environment [46, 47]. The better surface finish of 3D-printed splints also improves wear resistance and comfort.

Strengths and limitations of included studies

Most of the included studies were RCTs. Randomization is critical for bolstering internal validity and eliminating selection bias. The use of patient-reported outcomes plays a crucial role in evaluating the efficacy of treatments from the standpoint of care recipients, thereby augmenting the comprehensiveness of the research results. The studies included in this review had certain limitations: heterogeneity in the types of occlusal splints and variability in outcome measures. While some studies utilized adjustable splints, others used hard or soft splints, making it difficult to compare the outcomes directly. Furthermore, some studies had short follow-up durations, limiting the capacity to evaluate occlusal splint treatment's long-term efficacy and stability. The article search was only restricted to research in English, limiting accessibility to studies in other settings published in other languages.

Implications for clinical practice

Clinicians must acknowledge that occlusal splint treatment is valid for managing sleep bruxism and temporomandibular disorders [44]. Nevertheless, each patient's unique requirements and preferences must determine the selection of splint type. This review suggests that using a multimodal strategy that integrates occlusal splint treatment with complementary therapies, such as massage therapy, may result in more favorable outcomes, such as improved symptoms and overall well-being.

Patient-reported outcomes are paramount for assessing treatment efficacy [35]. Clinicians must prioritize patient-centered treatment by aggressively soliciting input from patients about their symptoms, degrees of pain, and general well-being [35]. Feedback should be used to make necessary changes and alterations to the treatment plan, prioritizing the patient's viewpoint within the care process.

Recommendations for future research

Future advancements in occlusal splint treatment should place greater emphasis on patient-reported outcomes. This may be achieved using validated instruments to evaluate the extent to which symptoms are alleviated and the subsequent effects on patients' overall quality of life, sleep patterns, and general well-being. Adopting a patient-centered approach is crucial for adequately customizing therapies to meet individuals' unique requirements. Furthermore, future research endeavors should integrate sophisticated objective assessments such as advanced electromyographic analysis or polysomnography to understand the physiological alterations associated with occlusal splint therapy. These assessments should encompass various aspects, including muscle activity, sleep patterns, and the occurrence of bruxism. Further investigation of the side effects and tolerability is required, specifically focusing on examining the frequency and intensity of the adverse effects of occlusal splint treatment.

Conclusion

This review provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of occlusal splints in managing sleep bruxism. Nevertheless, diverse therapies, limited follow-up durations, and inconsistent outcome measures across studies underscore the need for more extensive research in this field. The results of this study indicate that occlusal splint therapy is a viable treatment approach for sleep bruxism. However, further research is needed to understand its long-term effects, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse effects. The management of sleep bruxism requires careful consideration of several factors, highlighting the need to customize treatment approaches to suit the unique demands of each patient.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting this study's findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PEEK:

Polyether Ether Ketone

RCTs:

Randomized Control Trials

EMG:

Electromyographic

PSG:

Polysomnography

References

  1. Boening K, Wieckiewicz M, Paradowska-Stolarz A, Wiland P, Shiau YY. Temporomandibular disorders and oral parafunctions: mechanism, diagnostics, and therapy. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/354759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Topaloglu-Ak A, Kurtulmus H, Basa S, Sabuncuoglu O. Can sleeping habits be associated with sleep bruxism, temporomandibular disorders and dental caries among children? Dent Med Probl. 2022;59(4):517–22. https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/150615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shetty S, Pitti V, Satish Babu CL, Surendra Kumar GP, Deepthi BC. Bruxism: a literature review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010;10(3):141–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-011-0041-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lobbezoo F, et al. International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: report of a work in progress. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(11):837–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12663.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Smardz J, et al. Sleep bruxism and occurrence of temporomandibular disorders-related pain: a polysomnographic study. Front Neurol. 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00168.

  6. Raphael KG, et al. Masticatory muscle sleep background electromyographic activity is elevated in myofascial temporomandibular disorder patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(12):883–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dias GM, et al. A study of the association between sleep bruxism, low quality of sleep, and degenerative changes of the temporomandibular joint. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(8):2347–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000002084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mori H, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of cartilaginous tissues in human temporomandibular joint during prolonged clenching. Arch Oral Biol. 2010;55(11):879–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.07.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Görürgöz C, et al. Degenerative changes of the mandibular condyle in relation to the temporomandibular joint space, gender and age: a multicenter CBCT study. Dent Med Probl. 2023;60(1):127–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reddy SV, Kumar MP, Sravanthi D, Mohsin AHB, Anuhya V. Bruxism: A Literature Review. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(6):105–9. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4295445/.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Albagieh H, et al. Occlusal splints-types and effectiveness in temporomandibular disorder management. Saudi Dent J. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.12.013.

  12. Hardy RS, Bonsor SJ. The efficacy of occlusal splints in the treatment of bruxism: a systematic review. J Dent. 2021;108:103621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seweryn P, et al. Relationship between pain severity, satisfaction with life and the quality of sleep in Polish adults with temporomandibular disorders. Dent Med Probl. 2023;60(4). https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/171894.

  14. Kuzmanovic Pficer J, Dodic S, Lazic V, Trajkovic G, Milic N, Milicic B. Occlusal stabilization splint for patients with temporomandibular disorders: meta-analysis of short and long term effects. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(2):e0171296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171296.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang S, Li Z, Ye H, Zhao W, Liu Y, Zhou Y. Preliminary clinical evaluation of traditional and a new digital PEEK occlusal splints for the management of sleep bruxism. J Oral Rehabil. 2020;47(12):1530–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Poorna A, John B, Joshna EK, Rao A. Comparison of the effectiveness of soft and hard splints in the symptomatic management of temporomandibular joint disorders: a randomized control study. Int J Rheum Dis. 2022;25(9):1053–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.14379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Machado D, Martimbianco ALC, Bussadori SK, Pacheco RL, Riera R, Santos EM. Botulinum toxin type A for painful temporomandibular disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain. 2020;21(3–4):281–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2019.08.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tesch RDS, Macedo LCDSP, Fernandes FS, Goffredo Filho GSD, Goes CPDQF. Effectiveness of dry needling on the local pressure pain threshold in patients with masticatory myofascial pain. Systematic review and preliminary clinical trial. CRANIO®. 2019:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2019.1588518.

  19. Tran C, Ghahreman K, Huppa C, Gallagher JE. Management of temporomandibular disorders: a rapid review of systematic reviews and guidelines. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;51(9):1211–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.11.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tunér J, Hosseinpour S, Fekrazad R. Photobiomodulation in temporomandibular disorders. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2019.4705.

  21. Doeuk C, et al. Current indications for low level laser treatment in maxillofacial surgery: a review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;53(4):309–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.02.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Florjanski W, et al. Evaluation of biofeedback usefulness in masticatory muscle activity management—A systematic review. J Clin Med. 2019;8(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060766.

  23. Haggiag A, de Siqueira JTT. A new biofeedback approach for the control of masseter and temporal myalgia: utilization of an awake posterior interocclusal device. CRANIO®. 2018;38(3):180–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2018.1503991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Criado L, de La Fuente A, Heredia M, Montero J, Albaladejo A, Criado J. Electromyographic biofeedback training for reducing muscle pain and tension on masseter and temporal muscles: a pilot study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.52867.

  25. Macedo CR, Silva AB, Machado MAC, Saconato H, Prado GF. Occlusal splints for treating sleep bruxism (tooth grinding). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd005514.pub2.

  26. Page MJ, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J. 2021;372(71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

  27. Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007;7(7):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-7-16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Corbett MS, Higgins JPT, Woolacott NF. Assessing baseline imbalance in randomised trials: implications for the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Res Synth Methods. 2013;5(1):79–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1090.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Murad MH, Sultan S, Haffar S, Bazerbachi F. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23(2):60–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110853.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Karakis D, Dogan A, Bek B. Evaluation of the effect of two different occlusal splints on maximum occlusal force in patients with sleep bruxism: a pilot study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6(2):103. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Harada T, Ichiki R, Tsukiyama Y, Koyano K. The effect of oral splint devices on sleep bruxism: a 6-week observation with an ambulatory electromyographic recording device. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33(7):482–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01576.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dalewski B, et al. Pressure algometry evaluation of two occlusal splint designs in bruxism management-randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Med. 2021;10(11):2342. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112342.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Dubé C, Rompré PH, Manzini C, Guitard F, de Grandmont P, Lavigne GJ. Quantitative polygraphic controlled study on efficacy and safety of oral splint devices in tooth-grinding subjects. J Dent Res. 2004;83(5):398–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Okeson JP. The effects of hard and soft occlusal splints on nocturnal bruxism. J Am Dent Assoc (1939). 1987;114(6):788–91. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1987.0165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. de Paula Gomes CAF, El Hage Y, Amaral AP, Politti F, Biasotto-Gonzalez DA. Effects of massage therapy and occlusal splint therapy on electromyographic activity and the intensity of signs and symptoms in individuals with temporomandibular disorder and sleep bruxism: a randomized clinical trial. Chiropr Man Therap. 2014;22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-014-0043-6.

  36. Bergmann A, Edelhoff D, Schubert O, Erdelt KJ, Pho Duc JM. Effect of treatment with a full-occlusion biofeedback splint on sleep bruxism and TMD pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(11):4005–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03270-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lei Q, Lin D, Liu Y, Lin K, Huang W, Wu D. Neuromuscular and occlusion analysis to evaluate the efficacy of three splints on patients with bruxism. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03044-5.

  38. Kolcakoglu K, Dogan S, Tulga Oz F, Aydınbelge M. A comparison of hard and soft occlusal splints for the treatment of nocturnal bruxism in children using the BiteSTRIP®. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;46(3):219–24. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4625-46.3.8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ariji Y, Koyama S, Sakuma S, Nakayama M, Ariji E. Regional brain activity during jaw clenching with natural teeth and with occlusal splints: a preliminary functional MRI study. CRANIO®. 2016;34(3):188–94. https://doi.org/10.1179/2151090315y.0000000017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lukic N, Saxer T, Hou M, ZumbrunnWojczyńska A, Gallo LM, Colombo V. Short-term effects of NTI-tss and Michigan splint on nocturnal jaw muscle activity: a pilot study. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020;7(3):323–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.371.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Al Quran FAM, Lyons MF. The immediate effect of hard and soft splints on the EMG activity of the masseter and temporalis muscles. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(7):559–63. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00421.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Deregibus A. Are occlusal splints effective in reducing myofascial pain in patients with muscle-related temporomandibular disorders? A randomized-controlled trial. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;67(1):32–40. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2021.6615.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Silva CAGD, Grossi ML, Araldi JC, Corso LL. Can hard and/or soft occlusal splints reduce the bite force transmitted to the teeth and temporomandibular joint discs? A finite element method analysis. Cranio. 2020:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2020.1853464.

  44. Lobbezoo F, van der Zaag J, van Selms MKA, Hamburger HL, Naeije M. Principles for the management of bruxism. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35(7):509–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01853.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Paradowska-Stolarz AM, et al. Comparison of the tensile modulus of three 3D-printable materials used in dentistry. Dent Med Probl. 2023. https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/166070.

  46. Paradowska-Stolarz A, Wezgowiec J, Malysa A, Wieckiewicz M. Effects of polishing and artificial aging on mechanical properties of Dental LT Clear® Resin. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14(6):295. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14060295.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Orzeszek S, Waliszewska-Prosol M, Ettlin D, Seweryn P, Straburzynski M, Martelletti P, Jenca A Jr, Wieckiewicz M. Efficiency of occlusal splint therapy on orofacial muscle pain reduction: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02897-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All the authors are thankful to the King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia, for the financial Support.

Informed consent statement

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through Small group Research Project under grant number RGP1/331/44.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Substitute Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia

    Sultan Ainoosah & Ahmed E. Farghal

  2. Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia

    Marwa Saad Alzemei

  3. Department of Dental Technology, COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia

    Ravinder S. Saini, Vishwanath Gurumurthy, Syed Altafuddin Quadri & Abdulmajeed Okshah

  4. Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Qasr-E-Dasht Street, Shiraz, Iran

    Seyed Ali Mosaddad

  5. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Str. Koryun 2, Yerevan, 0025, Armenia

    Artak Heboyan

Authors
  1. Sultan Ainoosah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmed E. Farghal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marwa Saad Alzemei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ravinder S. Saini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vishwanath Gurumurthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Syed Altafuddin Quadri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Abdulmajeed Okshah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Seyed Ali Mosaddad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Artak Heboyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization and Methodology: Sultan Ainoosah, Ahmed Farghal Data Curation and Formal Analysis: Marwa Alzemei, Vishwa Gurumurthy, Syed Altafuddin Investigation and Resources: Abdulmajeed Okshah, Syed Altafuddin Original draft preparation: Ravinder S Saini, Artak Heboyan, Seyed Ali Mosaddad Writing, Reviewing, and Editing: Sultan Ainoosah, Ahmed Farghal, Marwa Alzemai, Seyed Ali Mosaddad Supervision and Project Administration: Abdulmajeed Okshah, Ravinder Saini Funding Acquisition: Ravinder Saini.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Seyed Ali Mosaddad or Artak Heboyan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ainoosah, S., Farghal, A.E., Alzemei, M.S. et al. Comparative analysis of different types of occlusal splints for the management of sleep bruxism: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health 24, 29 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03782-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03782-6

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us