Skip to main content

Micro-computed tomographic evaluation on the quality of single-cone obturation using a modified passive-deflation sealer injection needle: an in vitro study

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to design a modified passive-deflation sealer injection needle and investigate its ability to improve obturation quality of single-cone technique through assessing the distribution of voids in root canals using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).

Materials and methods

Forty-eight mandibular incisors were divided into eight groups (nā€‰=ā€‰6), according to the taper of root canal preparation (0.06 or 0.04), the needle used for sealer injection (modified or commercial iRoot SP injection needle), and the obturation method (iRoot SP sealer-only or single-cone obturation). After obturation, each specimen was scanned by micro-CT. The volumetric percentage and distribution of all voids were first analyzed and compared among groups, then the open and closed voids were separately analyzed and compared among single-cone obturation groups.

Results

Compared to commercial needle groups, modified needle groups showed much less voids, especially in the apical root canal part (Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05). Besides, the modified needle groups produced much less open voids than commercial needle groups despite the root canal taper (Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05).

Conclusions

The modified passive deflation sealer injection needle could effectively improve the quality of single-cone obturation through reducing intra-canal voids, especially open voids throughout the root canal, thus might possibly be developed as an effective intra-canal sealer delivering instrument.

Peer Review reports

Background

Root canal obturation is an essential step in root canal treatment, aiming to seal the intra-canal space and prevent bacterial invasion and reinfection [1]. Unsatisfactory root canal obturation normally contains gaps and voids in the filling material, which would serve as pathways for micro-leakage or shelters for infectious bacteria [2]. It is reported that voids among gutta-percha, sealer and canal wall could be a major cause of root canal reinfection [3].

Current root canal obturation techniques include cold lateral compaction, warm vertical compaction, and single-cone technique. The single-cone obturation technique involves the use of a single gutta-percha point matching the prepared root canal together with the root canal sealer. This technique shows many advantages over the cold lateral and warm vertical compaction techniques such as limited root canal enlargement, simplified procedures, and almost no pressure on the root canal wall and thermal damage to the periodontal membrane [4, 5]. Despite this, the single-cone technique seems likely to produce voids in root canal fillings, with a volumetric percentage of voids ranged from 1.6 to 9.7% in different studies [6,7,8,9,10].

Due to the low flowability and incompatibility of gutta-percha on dentin surface, sealer needs to be used to seal the gaps among gutta-percha or between gutta-percha and root canal wall [11]. IRoot SP is a bio-ceramic root canal sealer widely used in single-cone obturation due to its superior sealing property, bio-compatibility, and chemical stability [12, 13] However, when the sealer is injected into the root canal, especially the root canal with mature apex, it would push the air inside the canal towards the apical foramen to form an apical air bubble [14]. This phenomenon is commonly observed in root canal irrigation, which is known as the vapor lock effect [15]. Once formed, these bubbles would be difficult to remove by simply inserting gutta-percha cones, thus forming voids in root canal fillings and posing a negative effect on the root canal obturation [14, 16]. Therefore, preventing the voids formation in the root canal fillings, especially in the apical canal area, would be very important for the obturation quality of single-cone technique. To precisely assess the volume of voids within the root canal fillings, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) with high resolution is required due to its precision, safety and repeatability in detecting the voids within root canal fillings [17].

Based on the above knowledge, the purpose of this study was to design a modified passive-deflation sealer injection needle, and investigate its ability to improve the quality of single-cone obturation through assessing the distribution of voids in root canals using the micro-CT with high resolution.

Materials and methods

Sample selection

Utilizing G*Power 3.1 9.7 (Universitat Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany), ANOVA (fixed-effects, omnibus, one-way) was employed for calculating the sample size. Based on our previous experimental data [18], Ī± was set at 0.05, effect size at 0.6, and power Ī² at 0.8. The sample size was determined as 6 per group.

With the approval (2022-A20) of the Ethics Committee of School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, forty-eight mandibular incisors extracted due to periodontal disease were collected. The inclusion criteria for the teeth used in this study were as follows: single-rooted mandibular incisors with complete root development and similar root lengths, root canal curvature less than 15Ā°, no defect or resorption, and no history of dental treatment. Teeth with immature apices, absorption or fractures, multiple root canals, curvature greater than 15Ā°, caries, or those that had undergone root canal therapy were excluded. The teeth were cleaned using a scalpel to remove soft tissue, calculus and bone tissue, and then preserved in normal saline for following experiments.

Root canal preparation

All teeth were decoronated using a low-speed saw, preserving 12 mm of each root. A 10# K-file (Dentsply, Ballaigues, Switzerland) was inserted into root canal until the file tip was visible at the apical foramen. The inserting length was measured, and the working length was set as 0.5 mm shorter than the inserting length. The roots were then randomly divided into eight groups (Aā€‰āˆ¼ā€‰H), with 6 specimens in each group. After scouting and negotiation with 10# manual K-files, the root canals were prepared using Orodeka Plex 2.0 (Orodeka, Jining, China) rotary instruments according to manufactureā€™s instructions. Roots in groups A, B, E and F were prepared to 25# and 0.06 taper, while roots in groups C, D, G and H were prepared to 25# and 0.04 taper. Each file was discarded after 5 uses. During preparation, 5mL of 1% sodium hypochlorite solution was used as the irrigant. The root canals were dried by paper points and the apices were sealed by paraffin. All operations were performed by the same endodontist.

Design of modified needles

Modified passive-deflation sealer injection needles (Fig. 1a) were made using commercial iRoot SP plastic needles (Innovative Bioceramix, Vancouver, Canada) (Fig. 1b) and 30G side-opening irrigation needles (Renwoo, Shanghai, China). As we had described in our previous study [18], a small hole was made on the side of the commercial needle, and the 30G irrigation needle was inserted into the commercial needle through the hole and extended 5ā€‰āˆ¼ā€‰7 mm beyond the commercial needle tip (Fig. 1c). To ensure the irrigation needle tip could reach to 1ā€‰āˆ¼ā€‰2 mm from the apex, it was extended 5 mm from the commercial needle tip in 0.06 taper root canals, and 7 mm in 0.04 taper root canals. In this way, during iRoot SP injection, the sealer would enter the root canal from the gap between the commercial needle and the irrigation needle, while the air in the apical area would be passively deflated from the root canal through the irrigation needle (Fig. 1d).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Modified passive-deflation sealer injection needle and its working mechanism. (a) Picture of the modified passive-deflation injection needle; (b) Picture of the commercial plastic iRoot SP injection needle; (c) Illustration of the modified passive-deflation sealer injection needle; (d) Working mechanism of the modified needle

Root canal obturation

IRoot SP sealer (Innovative Bioceramix, Vancouver, Canada) was injected using commercial needles in groups A, C, E and G. The needle was connected to the iRoot SP syringe and inserted into the root canal to the maximal depth. The sealer was then slowly injected until the root canal was filled with sealer. Then the needle was slowly withdrawn from the root canal with continuous slow injection of the sealer. In groups B, D, F and H, modified needles were used for sealer injection with the same procedure. Each needle was discarded after single use.

For groups Eā€‰āˆ¼ā€‰H, after sealer injection, gutta-percha points with matched sizes were slowly inserted into root canals to the working length. Extra gutta-percha at the canal orifice was severed using the Beefill 2in1Ā® device (VDW, MĆ¼nchen, Germany). Then the canal orifice was sealed with flowable resin composite. All procedures were performed by the same endodontist.

All specimens were then stored at 37 Ā°C and 100% humidity for one week to allow the sealer to set completely.

Micro-CT scanning

Specimens were scanned using a SkyScan 1276 high-resolution micro-CT scanner (SkyScan, Kontich, Belgium). The parameters were set at 100 kV, 200ĀµA, spatial resolution of 6 Ī¼m, and rotation step of 0.25Ā°. The cross-section images were obtained through SkyScan CT analysis software (SkyScan, Kontich, Belgium). Mimics 20.0 (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) was used for three-dimensional visualization analysis and the volumetric measurement of voids and filling materials (gutta-percha and sealer) for each specimen. The whole root was divided into 3 equal parts (coronal, middle and apical) with each 4 mm long. The volumetric percentages of voids in the whole root canal and each canal part were calculated separately. The distribution of voids was analyzed and compared among groups. Additionally, in groups Eā€‰āˆ¼ā€‰H, voids were classified as closed voids (confined in the filling material) and open voids (communicating with the root canal wall), and their volumetric percentages in the whole and each part of root canal were further calculated respectively. The volumetric percentage of voids (total, closed or open)ā€‰=ā€‰volume of voids (total, closed or open) / (volume of total voidsā€‰+ā€‰volume of fillings) * 100%. To avoid observer bias, the above analysis and calculation processes were independently conducted by a single experienced examiner .

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad 9.0 (GraphPad Software, Boston, USA) and SPSS 24.0 (IBM Corp, Somers, USA), with all data expressed as meanā€‰Ā±ā€‰standard deviation (SD). The normality was assessed using the Sharpiro-Wilk test. Due to the non-normal distribution of data from multiple groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the volume of voids in different root canal parts among groups and within each group, and the Mann-Whitney test was applied for mutual comparisons between groups. The significance level was set as Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05.

Results

Difference of total voids in sealer-only injection (SOI) groups

The volumetric percentages of voids in each group were summarized in Table 1. The representative cross-sections and three-dimensional reconstructions of voids and fillings were shown in Fig. 2. Voids were identified in all groups. For SOI groups (Aā€‰āˆ¼ā€‰D), the overall volumetric percentages of voids in modified needle groups were significantly lower than those in commercial needle groups despite the canal taper (A vs. B, C vs. D, Pā€‰<ā€‰0.01 and <ā€‰0.05 respectively). In the coronal 1/3, there were no significant differences among all groups (Pā€‰>ā€‰0.05). In the middle 1/3 of 0.06 tapered canal, the volumetric percentage of voids in the modified needle group was significantly lower than that in the commercial needle group (A vs. B, Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05), but no significant difference was found in 0.04 tapered canals of this root part. In the apical 1/3, volumetric percentages of voids in modified needle groups were significantly lower than that in commercial needle groups despite the canal taper (A vs. B, C vs. D, Pā€‰<ā€‰0.01 and <ā€‰0.05 respectively). There were no statistical differences between different taper groups when using the same needle at each canal part (A vs. C, B vs. D, Pā€‰>ā€‰0.05).

Difference of total voids in single-cone obturation (SCO) groups

Similarly, for the overall volumetric percentages of voids in SCO groups (Eā€‰āˆ¼ā€‰H), modified needle groups were significantly lower than commercial needle groups despite the canal taper (E vs. F, G vs. H, Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05 and <ā€‰0.01 respectively). In the coronal 1/3, modified needle groups also showed significantly lower volumetric percentages of voids than commercial needle groups in both 0.06 and 0.04 tapered canals (E vs. F, G vs. H, Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05). In the middle 1/3, a significantly lower volumetric percentage of voids was only detected in the modified needle plus 0.04 rather than 0.06 tapered group (G vs. H, Pā€‰<ā€‰0.01). In the apical 1/3, a significantly lower volumetric percentage of voids existed in groups using modified needles in either 0.04 or 0.06 tapered canals (E vs. F, G vs. H, Pā€‰<ā€‰0.01). There were no significant differences between different taper groups using the same needle at each canal part (E vs. G, F vs. H, Pā€‰>ā€‰0.05).

Table 1 Volumetric Percentages of Voids (meanā€‰Ā±ā€‰SD) in Different Groups
Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative cross-sections and three-dimensional reconstructions of filling material (blue) and voids (yellow) in groups Aā€‰āˆ¼ā€‰H. (a) Representative cross-sections of the coronal 1/3; (b) Representative cross-sections of the middle 1/3; (c) Representative cross-sections of the apical 1/3; (d) Representative three-dimensional reconstructions of the whole root; (e) Representative three-dimensional reconstructions of filling material; (f) Representative three-dimensional reconstructions of voids

Voids distribution along root canal parts in SOI and SCO groups

For the volumetric percentage of voids in different root canal parts, there was a significant increasing trend from the coronal to apical parts in groups A, C and E (Table 1; Fig. 3). No significant differences were found in the remaining five groups.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Changes of volumetric percentages of total voids over different root canal parts of each group. (a) Volumetric percentage of voids from the coronal to apical parts in SOI groups (Aā€‰āˆ¼ā€‰D); (b) Volumetric percentage of voids from the coronal to apical parts in SCO groups (Eā€‰āˆ¼ā€‰H).

Differences of closed and open voids in SCO groups

Table 2 further demonstrated the differences between closed and open voids in SCO groups (groups Eā€‰āˆ¼ā€‰H). Almost all voids were open voids despite groups or root canal parts. However, the commercial needle groups (E and G) produced significantly more open voids than closed voids throughout the different root canal parts (Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05), while no significant differences were observed between the two types of voids in modified needle groups (F and H) throughout different root canal parts (Pā€‰>ā€‰0.05). The modified needle groups produced significantly less open voids throughout different root canal parts than the commercial needle groups despite the root canal taper (E vs. F, G vs. H, Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05). No obvious differences were found in the volumetric percentages of open voids between different canal tapers using the same kind of needle (E vs. G, F vs. H, Pā€‰>ā€‰0.05). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in volumetric percentages of closed voids among all groups (E vs. F, G vs. H, E vs. G, F vs. H, Pā€‰>ā€‰0.05). For the distribution of open voids at different root canal parts within each group, only group E exhibited significantly increased open voids in the apical 1/3 (Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05). As to the closed voids, there was no significant difference at different root canal parts within all four groups (Pā€‰>ā€‰0.05).

Table 2 Volumetric Percentages of Closed and Open Voids (meanā€‰Ā±ā€‰SD) in SCO Groups

Discussion

The quality of root canal obturation is an important factor affecting the prognosis of root canal treatment, as unsatisfactory obturation could lead to root canal reinfection and periapical diseases [19]. It is reported that flawed root canal filling could account for up to 58% of failed root canal treatments [20]. Intra-canal voids are a major flaw of the unsatisfactory obturation as it would seriously compromise the sealing quality of obturation, especially the voids in apical root canal region. Apical fillings without voids can significantly improve the prognosis of root canal treatment [21]. Various methods and devices have been employed to reduce voids in root canal fillings. Ultrasonic working tips can be used to break vapor lock in the apical region through cavitation and sonophoresis effects [22, 23], but the efficiency for removing voids is quite limited in the isthmus and apical root canal [24, 25]. Studies reported an 88.9%āˆ¼93.7% volumetric percentage of fillings in the apical root canal after using ultrasonic vibration with single-cone obturation [25], which seems much lower than the 99.57%āˆ¼99.83% of modified needle groups in this study. As for commercial sealer injection needles, such as 27G needle or 30G Navi needles, they are either too thick to reach the apical area of root canals or too thin for the sealer to flow through. Recently, negative pressure systems have been experimentally applied for intra-canal sealer induction, and this method can effectively reduce the apical voids and improve the quality of obturation, which reported a similar overall volumetric percentage of voids (0.33%) as that observed in this study (0.26%āˆ¼0.46%) [16]. Despite this, a special negative pressure device is needed and the parameter needs to be carefully adjusted for optimal results [16, 26]. The modified deflation sealer injection needle used in this study can be made using handy materials and would be easy to use in clinical situations.

In our previous study [18], the modified needle had been shown to be able to effectively reduce the voids in both resin and real root canals during the sealer injection. However, in the single-cone obturation technique, a gutta-percha point is required to insert into the canal after the sealer injection. Therefore, to clarify whether the modified needle could also reduce the voids after the insertion of the gutta-percha point, this study was designed to supplement our previous study.

In this study, regardless of the needle type used for sealer injection, intra-canal voids could not be completely eliminated. This result is consistent with previous studies [27, 28]. Despite this, this study demonstrated that modified needles could significantly reduce the intra-canal voids, especially in the apical part of root canal, than commercial needles. In SOI groups, modified needles significantly reduced the voids in the whole root canal, while more voids were found in the apical part of root canal when using the commercial needles despite the canal taper. This may be due to the fact that apical vapor lock effect was evident when the sealer was injected using commercial needles. On the other hand, when using the modified deflation needle, the air in apical area could be passively deflated so that the sealer could enter the apical part of root canal.

In SCO groups, the overall volumetric percentages of voids in groups using commercial needles were consistent with the results of previous studies [6,7,8,9,10]. In all groups, the modified needle effectively improved the obturation quality, especially in the apical 1/3. And in 0.04 tapered groups, the modified needle was proved to be very effective in reducing voids in all root canal parts, which may suggest it is suitable for sealer injection in canals with small tapers. Furthermore, for voids distribution in root canals of each group, the 0.06 tapered group using commercial needles showed more voids in the apical 1/3, while the 0.04 tapered group showed no significant differences in voids distribution along the root. This was probably due to the re-distribution of apical voids toward the middle and coronal canal parts after the inserting of gutta-percha point [16]. In the canal with a large taper, the distance of void moving towards middle and coronal parts would be less than in the canal with small taper. Meanwhile, no significant differences were observed in the distribution of voids for groups using modified needles, which was consistent with the results of SOI groups. In modified needle groups with either 0.06 or 0.04 taper, the insertion of gutta-percha point would not produce significant difference in the re-distribution of voids. Voids in root canal filling material could be classified as closed and open voids based on their locations. Closed voids refer to those voids inside the filling material (sealer and gutta-percha), which are considered to have no significant impact on the prognosis of root canal treatment due to the minimal possibility for these voids to become the pathway or shelter for bacteria invasion [29]. Open voids, however, are connected to the root canal wall and could become the pathway for micro-leakage and bacteria invasion, thus posing high risk for the long-term result of root canal treatment [30]. In this study, almost all voids were open voids in either commercial or modified needle group after the single-cone obturation, which was consistent with the results of previous studies [31, 32]. More importantly, the modified needle can effectively reduce the volumetric percentage of open voids throughout different root canal parts when compared to the commercial needle. The reduced open voids throughout different root canal parts in modified needle groups may mean the improved quality of single-cone obturation. As the open voids might serve as pathways for bacteria to enter root canals, reducing open voids would possibly lower the chance of root canal reinfection.

This study utilized mandibular incisors with single root canal due to their thin straight canal space so that the aimed root canal shape could be well reflected [33]. Moreover, the round shape of the prepared root canal would be suitable for single-cone obturation [34]. As the apical foramen is surrounded by periodontal ligament and alveolar bone in vivo, paraffin was used to seal the apex in this study, simulating the in-vivo conditions. Besides, during the single-cone obturation process in this study, the gutta-percha point was slowly inserted into the sealer-filled root canal to ensure minimal sealers could be pushed out of the apical foramen, which is same as required in the clinical operations.

In previous studies, chemical and microscopic methods such as dye penetration testing, fluid transport method, and scanning electron microscopy analysis are commonly used for evaluating the quality of root canal obturation [35,36,37]. However, these methods may cause material loss during sample processing, thus affecting the accuracy of analysis [38]. In recent decades, micro-CT has been applied in related studies due to its properties of rapidity, high-precision, and non-destruction to samples [17]. Micro-CT with high resolution can distinguish dentin, filling materials and voids based on the grayscale values, and generate two-dimensional (2D) tomographic images through scanning. These 2D images could be transformed into 3D reconstructions that accurately display the stereoscopic morphology and spatial relationships of dentin, filling material and voids [10, 39,40,41,42], which enables quantitative and qualitative assessments of the quality of root canal obturation [43]. The resolution of micro-CT plays a crucial role in analyzing voids, affecting the accuracy of results [44]. Therefore, in this study, a high resolution (6 Ī¼m) was used to obtain accurate images for voids analysis.

Despite the findings of this study, due to the small sample size, the limited type of root canal, and the lack of in vivo studies, the efficiency and stability of this modified passive deflation sealer injection needle still needs further investigations.

Conclusions

Based on the findings of this study, the modified passive deflation sealer injection needle could effectively improve the quality of single-cone obturation through reducing intra-canal voids, especially open voids throughout the root canal, thus might possibly be developed to an effective intra-canal sealer delivering instrument. Despite this, more in vitro and in vivo studies need be conducted to further test the efficiency and stability of this modified needle.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

Micro-CT:

Micro-computed tomography

SOI:

Sealer-only injection

SCO:

Single-cone obturation with sealer and gutta-percha

2D:

Two dimension

3D:

Three dimension

SD:

Standard deviation

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

References

  1. Wolf M, KĆ¼pper K, Reimann S, et al. 3D analyses of interface voids in root canals filled with different sealer materials in combination with warm gutta-percha technique. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:155ā€“61.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Liu H, Lai WWM, Hieawy A, et al. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the quality of Root Canal fillings in Mandibular molars after Obturation for 54 months. J Endod. 2021;47:1783ā€“9.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Valera MC, Camargo CH, Carvalho AS, et al. In vitro evaluation of apical microleakage using different root-end filling materials. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14:49ā€“52.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Cherng AM, Chow LC, Takagi S. In vitro evaluation of a calcium phosphate cement root canal filler/sealer. J Endod. 2001;27:613ā€“5.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Deniz Sungur D, Moinzadeh AT, Wesselink PR, et al. Sealing efficacy of a single-cone root filling after post space preparation. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:1071ā€“7.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Somma F, Cretella G, Carotenuto M, et al. Quality of thermoplasticized and single point root fillings assessed by micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2011;44:362ā€“9.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Angerame D, De Biasi M, Pecci R, et al. Analysis of single point and continuous wave of condensation root filling techniques by micro-computed tomography. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2012;48:35ā€“41.

    PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Celikten B, Uzuntas F, Orhan CI. Micro-CT assessment of the sealing ability of three root canal filling techniques. J Oral Sci. 2015;57:361ā€“6.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Huang Y, Celikten B, de Faria Vasconcelos K, et al. Micro-CT and nano-CT analysis of filling quality of three different endodontic sealers. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46:e20170223.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Kim JA, Hwang YC, Rosa V, et al. Root Canal Filling Quality of a Premixed Calcium Silicate Endodontic Sealer Applied using Gutta-Percha cone-mediated Ultrasonic activation. J Endod. 2018;44:133ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Kebudi Benezra M, Schembri Wismayer P, Camilleri J. Interfacial characteristics and cytocompatibility of hydraulic sealer cements. J Endod. 2018;44:1007ā€“17.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Jafari F, Jafari S. Composition and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate based sealers: a review article. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9:e1249ā€“1255.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Donnermeyer D, BĆ¼rklein S, Dammaschke T, et al. Endodontic sealers based on calcium silicates: a systematic review. Odontology. 2019;107:421ā€“36.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Stich H. Obturation of root canals with different sealers using non-instrumentation technology. Int Endod J. 1999;32:17ā€“23.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Tay FR, Gu LS, Schoeffel GJ, et al. Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery. J Endod. 2010;36:745ā€“50.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Li J, Bergeron BE, Chao J, et al. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of root canal filling quality with apical negative pressure. J Dent. 2020;100:e103431.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Evaluation of root canal obturation: a three-dimensional in vitro study. J Endod. 2009;35:541ā€“4.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Chen Z, Yang Y, Fan W. Reducing apical voids for intra-canal sealer injection using a modified passive deflation needle. Odontology Published Online January 20, 2024.

  19. Craveiro MA, Fontana CE, de Martin AS, et al. Influence of coronal restoration and root canal filling quality on periapical status: clinical and radiographic evaluation. J Endod. 2015;41:836ā€“40.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Fan Y, Wang Z, Sun Y, et al. Effect of the modified methacrylate-based Root Canal Sealer in single-cone technique. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022;12:3722.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  21. PedullĆ  E, Abiad RS, Conte G, et al. Root fillings with a matched-taper single cone and two calcium silicate-based sealers: an analysis of voids using micro-computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:4487ā€“92.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Liang A, Huang L, Li B, et al. Micro-CT evaluation of different Root Canal Irrigation protocols on the removal of accumulated hard tissue debris: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11:e6053.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Cho YS. Ultrasonic vibration and thermo-hydrodynamic technique for filling root canals: technical overview and a case series. Int Endod J. 2021;54:1668ā€“76.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Barreto CDCG, Calefi PHS, Vivacqua-Gomes N, et al. New Ultrasonic tip for Root Canal Filling of the Mesial canals of Mandibular molars with Isthmus: a laboratory evaluation using computed micro-tomography. J Endod. 2023;49:544ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Cho YS, Kwak Y, Shin SJ. Comparison of Root Filling Quality of two types of single cone-based Canal Filling methods in Complex Root Canal anatomies: the Ultrasonic vibration and Thermo-Hydrodynamic Obturation versus single-cone technique. Mater (Basel). 2021;14:e6036.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  26. Suter B, Portmann P, Lussi A. A 5-year review of teeth filled with the non-instrumentation technology. Int Endod J. 2009;42:639ā€“48.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Celikten B, Uzuntas CF, Orhan AI, et al. Evaluation of root canal sealer filling quality using a single-cone technique in oval shaped canals: an in vitro Micro-CT study. Scanning. 2016;38:133ā€“40.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  28. Keleş A, Alcin H, Kamalak A, et al. Micro-CT evaluation of root filling quality in oval-shaped canals. Int Endod J. 2014;47:1177ā€“84.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  29. Huang Y, Orhan K, Celikten B et al. Evaluation of the sealing ability of different root canal sealers: a combined SEM and micro-CT study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26e20160584.

  30. Sfeir G, Bukiet F, Kaloustian MK, et al. Evaluation of the impact of Calcium Silicate-based sealer insertion technique on Root Canal Obturation Quality: a Micro-computed Tomography Study. Bioeng (Basel). 2023;10:1331.

    CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  31. Milanovic I, Milovanovic P, Antonijevic D, et al. Immediate and Long-Term Porosity of Calcium Silicate-based sealers. J Endod. 2020;46:515ā€“23.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  32. Drukteinis S, Bilvinaite G, Tusas P, et al. Microcomputed Tomographic Assessment of the single cone Root Canal Fillings performed by Undergraduate Student, Postgraduate Student and specialist endodontist. J Clin Med. 2021;10:1080.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  33. Liu J, Luo J, Dou L, et al. CBCT study of root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular incisors in a Chinese population. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72:26ā€“30.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  34. Chybowski EA, Glickman GN, Patel Y, et al. Clinical outcome of non-surgical Root Canal Treatment using a single-cone technique with Endosequence Bioceramic Sealer: a retrospective analysis. J Endod. 2018;44:941ā€“5.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  35. Dong X, Xie Q, Xu X. In vitro evaluation of the sealing ability of combined use of iRoot BP Plus and iRoot SP for root-end filling. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27:2969ā€“77.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  36. Ɩzok AR, Verhaagen B, Wesselink PR. Improving the accuracy of a fluid transport method. Int Endod J. 2013;46:348ā€“54.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  37. Mancino D, Kharouf N, Cabiddu M, et al. Microscopic and chemical evaluation of the filling quality of five obturation techniques in oval-shaped root canals. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:3757ā€“65.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  38. Zogheib C, Naaman A, Sigurdsson A, et al. Comparative micro-computed tomographic evaluation of two carrier-based obturation systems. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:1879ā€“83.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  39. Rodriguez JA, Xu R, Chen CC, et al. Three-dimensional coherent X-ray diffractive imaging of whole frozen-hydrated cells. IUCrJ. 2015;2:575ā€“83.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  40. Tomaszewska IM, Leszczyński B, WrĆ³bel A, et al. A micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) analysis of the root canal morphology of maxillary third molar teeth. Ann Anat. 2018;215:83ā€“92.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  41. Brasil SC, Marceliano-Alves MF, Marques ML, et al. Canal Transportation, unprepared areas, and dentin removal after Preparation with BT-RaCe and ProTaper Next systems. J Endod. 2017;43:1683ā€“7.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  42. Silveira SB, Alves FRF, Marceliano-Alves MF, et al. Removal of Root Canal fillings in Curved canals using either Mani GPR or HyFlex NT followed by Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation. J Endod. 2018;44:299ā€“e3031.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  43. Jung M, Lommel D, Klimek J. The imaging of root canal obturation using micro-CT. Int Endod J. 2005;38:617ā€“26.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  44. Orhan K, Jacobs R, Celikten B, et al. Evaluation of threshold values for Root Canal Filling voids in Micro-CT and Nano-CT images. Scanning. 2008;2018:e9437569.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82270968) and the Top Youth Talent in Medicine Program of Hubei Province, China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZC and NC conducted the experiments, collected and analyzed data, prepared the manuscript; YY assisted with the data collection and analysis; WF designed the experiments, provided funding supports and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Fan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University (2022-A20). The need for informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee of School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisherā€™s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articleā€™s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the articleā€™s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Chen, N., Yang, Y. et al. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation on the quality of single-cone obturation using a modified passive-deflation sealer injection needle: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 24, 476 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04232-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04232-7

Keywords