Skip to main content
Download PDF

Identification and assessment of factors that impact the demand for and supply of dental hygienists amidst an evolving workforce context: a scoping review

BMC Oral Health volume 24, Article number: 631 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study involved a scoping review to explore factors influencing dental hygienist demand and supply in high-income countries.

Methods

A six-stage scoping review was conducted with separate search strategies tailored to four databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Google) plus a targeted scan of dental hygienist organization websites. This yielded 2,117 unique citations, leading to 148 articles included in the review.

Results

Nearly half of the articles (47%) focused on the United States, with 11% on Canada. Most articles (91%) were in English, alongside 13 in Korean and one in French. Journal articles comprised 62% of the publications, followed by reports/working papers (11%) and websites (11%). Other types included conference abstracts, policy briefs, and presentation slides. Content-wise, 47% were original research, with analysis articles (14%), commentaries (11%), and reviews (8%) also present. The articles were coded into three main categories: workforce characteristics/projections, factor-specific analyses, and workforce opportunities. The articles on workforce characteristics covered demographic, geographic, and employment aspects of dental hygienists, along with projections for supply and demand using simulation modelling and geospatial analyses. Factor-specific articles investigated the (1) working environment, (2) policy/regulatory/training environment, (3) job/career satisfaction and related human resource issues, and (4) scope of practice. The third key category of articles highlighted opportunities for expanding the workforce through alternative models in different sectors/settings (e.g., public health, primary care, long-term care, hospitals, mobile outreach, and non-clinical roles including research, education and leadership) and for a range of vulnerable or underserved populations (e.g., geriatric and pediatric populations, persons with disabilities, those living in rural/remote areas, Indigenous peoples, and incarcerated people).

Conclusions

This review provides a comprehensive documentation of the current state of the dental hygienist workforce, compiling factors affecting demand and supply, and highlighting opportunities for the dental hygienist workforce in Canada and other high-income countries. The findings offer a foundation for future research, highlighting the need for more focused and rigorous reviews and underscoring the necessity of high-quality studies to verify the effectiveness of various interventions and policies. This is crucial to address dental hygienist workforce challenges and ensure the sustainability and effectiveness of oral health care delivery.

Peer Review reports

Background

The dental hygiene profession, a key part of the oral health care field, has navigated through various challenges and transformations since it was established in the early 20th century [1]. Dental hygienists play a pivotal role in preventive oral health care, contributing significantly to population and public health.

Historically, the oral health care field has experienced considerable fluctuations in workforce dynamics, influenced by regulatory, educational, economic, and health-related factors. Some of the factors that have been noted include increases to dental hygiene education program capacity that lead to a higher number of qualified professionals entering the market; economic shifts that often influence health care funding, public spending on oral health, and employment opportunities for dental hygienists; and evolving scope-of-practice regulations and licensure requirements affecting where and how dental hygienists can practice [2,3,4]. These factors collectively contributed to a complex pre-pandemic workforce landscape, marked by regional disparities in the distribution of dental hygienists and varying employment opportunities [2, 5, 6].

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented challenges to the broader health care sector. The impact on the dental hygiene workforce was multifaceted, including health risks and safety concerns, economic effects, and clinical practice adaptations [7,8,9]. For example, dental hygienists faced high exposure risks due to the nature of their work, leading to increased safety concerns and work environment adjustments. The economic impact of the pandemic affected public spending on oral health and led to temporary closures or reduced operations in dental practices. The profession also adapted quickly to the need for enhanced safety protocols and tele-dentistry practices. Ultimately, there are indications that many dental hygienists left the profession during the pandemic, and post-pandemic, there is a growing perception of an undersupply of dental hygienists, attributed to factors such as workforce attrition, changes in work-life preferences, and ongoing safety concerns [10].

In light of this context characterizing the evolving pressures on the dental hygienist workforce, this study seeks to provide relevant insights for how high-income countries can move forward. With no existing or in-progress reviews on this topic registered with PROSPERO or Open Science Framework registries, this study aimed to conduct a scoping review to comprehensively explore the contemporary factors influencing dental hygienist demand and supply to contribute to a deeper understanding of the current state and future needs of this important oral health care profession.

Methods

This study followed a six-stage scoping review adapted from the methodology first described by Arksey and O’Malley [11] and later refined with recommendations for additional methodological rigour by Levac et al. [12] and Daudt et al. [13]. Results of the scoping review are documented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA ScR) [14] (Additional file 1).

Stage 1. Identifying the review question

In the context of evolving workforce conditions for dental hygiene both pre and post COVID-19 pandemic, the main aim of the scoping review was to address the following review question: ‘What is known about the factors that impact the demand for or supply of dental hygienists in high-income countries’.

Stage 2. Identifying relevant articles

A comprehensive search strategy involving four databases (Ovid-MEDLINE, EBSCO-Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Google Scholar, Google) was employed to identify relevant literature from both peer-reviewed and grey literature sources. MEDLINE and CINAHL databases were primarily utilized to access peer-reviewed research studies, offering a robust collection of academic articles across various dental hygiene and oral health care disciplines. Google Scholar served as a supplementary resource, providing access to a wide array of peer-reviewed journal articles, while also capturing a significant amount of grey literature, including reports published by government organizations, professional associations and regulatory agencies. Lastly, Google was used to broaden the search for grey literature, enabling identification of diverse sources such as working papers, reports, policy documents, conference abstracts, and unpublished studies. This multi-database approach allowed a thorough exploration of the available literature, while being mindful of scope and feasibility considerations.

Search strategies specific to each database were developed, using a mix of subject headings, keywords, and Boolean operators (where applicable). This resulted in similar search strategies for MEDLINE and CINAHL, and five distinct search strategies for both Google Scholar and Google (see Additional file 2 for the search strategies used for each of the four databases). Limits were not imposed for language or publication type and the eligible time period was set to go back no more than 10 years (i.e., articles published in 2013 or later) to focus on current factors that impact demand or supply. All searches were conducted in April and May 2023.

Stage 3. Article selection

All search results were exported to and managed in an Excel database. Results from the MEDLINE and CINAHL searches were combined, and duplicates removed. Google Scholar and Google search results were also compared, and duplicates removed. Study selection involved screening of titles and abstracts to identify relevant articles that were then subjected to full-text assessment to determine the final set of articles to be included in the review.

Eligibility criteria to guide screening were developed by identifying a representative sample of 10 articles from preliminary searches and discussing their relevance with the research team. Based on the feedback, the following eligibility criteria were established:

  • Articles must focus on dental hygienists (either exclusively or alongside other related professions).

  • Articles must focus on factors impacting on demand for and/or supply of dental hygienists (e.g., accessibility, availability, capacity, workforce).

  • Articles should focus on high-income jurisdictions where dental hygienists have a similar scope of practice as in Ontario, Canada.

  • Articles must be published in the last 10 years (2013 to present).

  • No article type restrictions.

  • No article language restrictions.

For the MEDLINE and CINAHL search results, all identified titles/abstracts were screened for relevance based on the above eligibility criteria. All search results from the five Google search strategies (automatically excluding the Google omitted results) were screened based on titles, available excerpts and clicking on one weblink maximum. For the Google Scholar search, the first 100 results (where available) for each of the five search strategies were screened based on titles, available excerpts and clicking on one weblink maximum, with screening of additional results conducted in batches of 20 based on ongoing saturation assessment. If no new documents were identified in the subsequent batch, screening was stopped screening. All screening was conducted by one reviewer (AV) with a second reviewer (MJD) screening a subset of titles/abstracts from all four databases to calibrate the interpretation of the eligibility criteria. Any disagreements were discussed and resolved through consensus. Where necessary, DEEPL Translate or Google Translate was used to translate non-English titles/abstracts into English to facilitate screening.

For all records screened as potentially relevant, attempts were made to retrieve full-text versions for further assessment. DEEPL Translate was used to translate full-text articles originally published in a non-English language into English to facilitate the full-text assessment. All full-text articles were assessed by one reviewer (AV) with a subset reviewed by a second reviewer (MJD) for calibration purposes. Any disagreements were discussed and resolved through consensus. Full-text assessment was based on the same eligibility criteria used for title/abstract screening.

Stage 4. Data extraction

A data extraction form was developed in Excel that included the following fields: citation information (including uniform resource locator – URL), publication type, article type, jurisdiction, sub-jurisdiction, methodological approach, target professions and/or populations, summary findings, summary conclusions, and future research/policy gaps. One reviewer (AV) conducted an initial extraction of data from the included articles, with the second reviewer (MJD) reviewing and updating the data extraction for all included articles.

Stage 5. Synthesis

Once data extraction was complete, the extracted data were analyzed and synthesized through multiple lenses. This included documenting the distribution of identified articles by year, jurisdiction/sub-jurisdiction, publication type, article type, and publication language. One reviewer (MJD) thematically coded each included article based primarily on the summary findings and/or summary conclusions, with coding categories iteratively refined and synthesized to identify articles with similar focus. The research team reviewed and provided feedback on the thematic coding categories.

Given the intention to capture a mix of article types (i.e., the search was not restricted to original research or review articles), a formal quality appraisal of the included articles was not conducted. However, the research methodologies employed for the original research, analysis, and review articles were documented.

Stage 6. Consultation

As the research team included several senior members of the Ontario College of Dental Hygienists with established networks and relationships with Canadian and international dental hygienist stakeholder organizations and leaders, their knowledge and perspectives provided an additional lens on the scoping review findings. The team’s networks were further leveraged to identify a selection of comparable Canadian and international dental hygienist organizations (e.g., professional associations and regulators) to include in a targeted scan of their websites to identify additional records. Table 1 provides the final list of targeted organizations for the scan.

Table 1 Jurisdictions/organizations targeted for scan
Full size table

To capture publicly available information on these organizations’ websites, a two-pronged approach was taken. First, each website’s available search functionality was used to search for five principal keywords (i.e., workforce, supply/demand, capacity, access, availability); then, a manual scan of each website was conducted to identify relevant documents. Google Translate was used to translate non-English language websites to English to facilitate the targeted scan. Any identified articles or documents were integrated into the review and followed the methodology outlined above. All targeted websites were scanned between April and June 2023.

Results

The study identified 2117 unique records, of which 162 were flagged for full-text assessment after title/abstract screening. After full-text assessment, 148 articles/documents were included in the final review. Table 2; Fig. 1 provide an overview of the scoping review results at key stages of screening and review, while Additional file 3 provides a complete list of the 148 articles/documents including in the final review.

Table 2 Search results
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA-ScR flow diagram of scoping review results

Full size image

Key characteristics of the 148 articles were documented (Table 3). The published articles were distributed relatively evenly over the last 10 years, with between 9 and 14 articles identified each year from 2013 to 2023, with exceptions being 2020 (17 articles) and 2022 (25 articles). The publication language was English for over 90% of the articles reviewed. Fourteen non-English language articles (13 Korean, one French), which each included an English language title/abstract, were included, and DEEPL Translate was used to generate a full-text English language version of these articles for the review.

Table 3 Characteristics of included articles
Full size table

The intent was to focus on high-income jurisdictions with similar scope of practice for dental hygienists as Ontario, Canada. While 16 (11%) of the articles focused on Canadian jurisdictions, almost half of the included articles focused on the United States (USA) (47%), followed by Korea (11%), United Kingdom (UK) (7%), Australia (6%) and Japan (5%) (Table 3). Seven other countries were the focus of three or fewer articles, while an additional five articles had an international or multi-jurisdictional focus. Most of these jurisdictions have active dental hygienist professions and the review includes International Federation of Dental Hygienists country profiles for each of the represented countries where updated information on dental hygiene profession was available (exceptions: Hong Kong, Ireland).

Of the 148 articles included in the review, the most common publication type was journal articles (62%), followed by reports/working papers (11%), and websites (including blogs, policy information and country profiles) (11%) (Table 3). Other publication types included conference abstracts, policy briefs, and presentation slides. When examining the types of articles, almost half were original research (47%), followed by analysis articles (14%), commentaries (11%), and reviews (8%) (Table 3).

As noted in the summary of the methodological approach, there was no restriction on publication type or article type to allow for a broad range of contextual factors and perspectives to be considered. Further, a formal quality appraisal of included articles was not conducted. However, the research methodologies employed for the 102 original research, analysis, and review article types included in the review were documented (Table 4). For the 69 articles categorized as original research, the majority (58 studies) employed quantitative methods, including surveys, geospatial analyses, administrative data analyses, quasi-experimental studies, and electronic medical record reviews. Another 10 of the original research articles were based on qualitative research methods (e.g., interviews, focus groups, document review), while one other original research article was based on a mixed methods (qualitative/quantitative) approach. For the 21 articles categorized as analysis articles, the methodology was identified for 18. This included six articles describing workforce modelling methods (e.g., simulation modelling), several based on secondary analyses of existing data sets (four based on analysis of multiple data sources, three based on survey data from licensure renewal processes, two based on analysis of registrant or administrative data sources), two document reviews (e.g., state-by-state direct access legislation for dental hygienists), and one strategic review. The three remaining analysis articles drew on mixed data sources but did not specify any specific methods. Finally, of the 12 review articles, 10 were published in journal articles, one in a report, and one in a presentation slide. Only three of the review articles noted any specific review methodology (one systematic review, one scoping review, one narrative review).

Table 4 Methodological approach of original research, analysis and review articles
Full size table

Thematic coding of the 148 included articles resulted in three primary categories, including (1) workforce characteristics or projections (27 articles), (2) factors impacting on the supply of or demand for dental hygienists (100 articles), and (3) opportunities to impact supply or demand for dental hygienists (21 articles).

Discussion

The review identified 148 articles, which given the flexible eligibility criteria, included a wide range of publication and article types. Although the focus was on high-income countries where dental hygienists had a similar scope of practice to Ontario, Canada, there was still good diversity with 13 countries represented, including 85 articles (57%) from North America, 35 (24%) from Asia-Pacific, 23 (16%) from Europe/UK, and 5 (3%) with an international focus. Although over 91% of articles were published in English, it is important to note that 13 included articles were published in Korean. Korea has an active dental hygienist profession and associated academic sector, with several dedicated academic journals indexed by major scholarly databases publishing on dental hygiene in Korean. As the interest was in assessing factors impacting demand for and supply of dental hygienists that extended both before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, it is also notable that there was a reasonable balance between the 84 (57%) articles published before 2020, and the 64 (43%) articles published from 2020 to 2023. This latter time period is an imperfect proxy for the pandemic/post-pandemic period given that that some articles published in 2020 may have been prepared pre-pandemic. It is also worth noting that while the recent uptick in published articles might be explained by broader shifts in publication rates during the COVID-19 pandemic, the search results indicate that dental hygienist demand/supply issues have received limited but consistent attention over the last decade.

Beyond the descriptive results of the scoping review, thematic coding of the included articles was key to synthesizing the findings. The key themes captured articles that focused on core workforce characteristics and projections, a wide range of factors impacting on demand and supply, and opportunities for the dental hygienist workforce. The following sections summarize the key findings by thematic category.

Dental hygienist workforce characteristics/projections

Several articles were identified that described basic demographic (e.g., age, gender), geographic (e.g., practice location and distribution), and employment (e.g., part-time vs. full-time) characteristics of the dental hygienist workforce in different jurisdictions. This included Australia [15], Canada [16,17,18], New Zealand [19], Korea [20], Sweden [19], the UK [3], and the USA (including specific states such as Florida [21], Indiana [22], Iowa [23], Massachusetts [24], and Minnesota [25]). Several other articles went a step further, using different methodological approaches to provide projections for both the demand for and supply of dental hygienists and to assess the resultant gaps (i.e., gap analysis). This included simulation modelling for the USA [26,27,28], geospatial analyses for Australia [29] and Germany [30], and two comprehensive workforce assessments for Hong Kong [31, 32] and one for the UK [5].

Most workforce projections prior to the COVID-19 pandemic indicated an oversupply of dental hygienists, however, this was not universal. For example, one American analysis in 2015 suggested an oversupply of dental hygienists in all but five states (Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, West Virginia) [26] while two analyses of Hong Kong’s dental hygienist workforce in 2014 and 2017 projected a shift from an oversupply to undersupply of dental hygienists [31, 32], and another analysis of the UK’s oral health care workforce in 2014 projected a substantive undersupply of dental hygienists [5]. Assessments conducted at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic or thereafter, suggested important shifts to the dental hygienist workforce with undersupply a major concern [10, 33]. Two geospatial analyses, both conducted pre-COVID-19 pandemic, suggested variable distributions with respect to population and/or socio-economic distributions [29, 30]. While the articles reviewed describe key characteristics and workforce projections from many high-income jurisdictions, collectively, they do not provide a clear general pattern for shifting dental hygienist demand or supply over the last decade.

Factors impacting on dental hygienist demand/supply

Beyond the basic assessment of workforce characteristics and projections, the majority of articles identified examined various factors that impact the demand for or supply of dental hygienists. The key types of factor identified can be categorized as (1) working environment factors, (2) policy/regulatory/training environment factors, (3) job/career satisfaction factors and related human resource issues, and (4) scope of practice factors.

Working environment factors

Seven articles focused on the dental hygienist working environment, with two Canadian studies providing evidence of high rates of workplace bullying, harassment, abuse and/or violence by employers, colleagues or clients [34, 35]. Three articles addressed the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the dental hygienist workforce in the USA [8, 36] and Spain [9], while two other articles addressed mental health challenges for dental hygienists in Sweden [37] and the UK [38]. Each of these articles outline important working environment factors that impact workforce supply.

Policy/regulatory/training environment factors

The review included several articles that captured policy, regulatory and/or training environment factors. Three articles described USA-state level regulatory environments, two which focused on licensure requirements [39] or license portability [40] and a third that presented an examination of the relationship between state-specific workforce policies and underserved individuals’ access to oral health care services [41]. The review also captured 11 country profiles that outline jurisdiction-specific requirements to work as a dental hygienist. Note that not all country profiles were current and any that were last updated before 2013 were excluded [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Several articles covered dental hygienist training program changes, including an article on survey results for motivations for pursing a baccalaureate degree [53], four articles commenting on the education needs of the profession [54,55,56,57], and four articles on the impacts of higher education requirements [4, 58,59,60]. A Korean study described the development of a ‘job performance assessment tool’ that aimed to align evolving performance needs with training curricula [61].

Job/career satisfaction factors / human resource issues

The review identified many articles that targeted various aspects of dental hygienist job/career satisfaction or related human resource issues in different jurisdictions. These factors all relate directly to workforce supply. For example, five Korean articles and three Japanese articles focused on aspects of dental hygienist mobility, turnover and return-to-work [62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69]. Five articles also addressed dental hygienist burnout, including two from the USA [70, 71], and one from Canada [72], Ireland [73], and Korea [74]. A survey conducted in Iowa, USA assessed factors contributing to multiple job-holding scenarios for dental hygienists [75]. Another article from the USA reported on a survey of dentists regarding their challenges in recruiting dental hygienists post-COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, another series of articles focused on various enablers or components of dental hygienist job/career satisfaction. This included two from Korea [76, 77], and one each from Australia [78], Japan [79] and the USA [80].

Scope of practice factors

Scope of practice was a key focus of a number of the articles reviewed. This included a wide mix of article types (e.g., original research, secondary analyses, reviews, commentaries) and research methods employed (e.g., broad range of qualitative and quantitative methods). The majority of articles on scope of practice were from the USA, but six other countries were represented (Australia, Canada, Finland, Japan, Switzerland, UK). These scope of practice articles primarily focused on (1) expansion of the dental hygienist scope of practice, (2) direct access / independent practice, and (3) misunderstanding of the dental hygienist role and scope of practice.

Articles on the expansion of the dental hygienist scope of practice included a survey of extended practice dental hygienists in Oregon, USA that identified key barriers to optimizing the extended practice permit available in that state [81]. That study found that lack of business knowledge, lack of experience, insurance reimbursement challenges and start-up costs were all barriers that limited the utilization of the expanded scope of practice that could be addressed through adaptation to training curricula and internship opportunities. Another article noted legislative efforts in Arizona, USA to facilitate delivery and billing of dental hygiene services in medical environments (e.g., hospitals, long-term care facilities) [82]. Several other articles addressed the impact on outcomes when the dental hygienist scope of practice was extended or expanded. A geospatial analysis drawing primarily on administrative data in the 13 state Appalachia region of the USA found that areas with low availability of dentists and dental hygienists had significantly lower dental service provision [83]. Several articles reported on analyses that linked broader scope of practice for dental hygienists to improved oral health outcomes among US states [84,85,86], while another American study noted that expanded roles for dental hygienists could have positive impacts on specific populations, such as low-income children in the state of Kansas [87]. Finally, an Australian survey of dental hygienists, dental therapists and oral health therapists compared the extent to which each profession was able to reach its full scope of practice [88]. The results suggested that in the Australian context, only the oral health therapists reached their full scope, but the study also provided important insights for optimizing scope of practice for jurisdictions, like Ontario, that that do not have active dental therapist or oral health therapist professions.

There were a number of articles that focused on direct access or independent practice for dental hygienists. There were a few historical summaries and/or documentation of legislative and policy achievements in the USA and UK on the introduction of direct access for dental hygienists [89,90,91,92], with one highlighting the variation across US states on direct access provisions [90]. A UK-based study in Wales assessed the range of oral health needs of care home residents that could be wholly provided by dental hygienists or dental therapists without oversight from a dentist [93]. The study indicated that 22% of care home resident oral health treatment needs could be provided by a dental hygienist without dentist supervision, and that increased to 43% for dental hygienists with special care experience, suggesting important potential impacts if direct access policies are optimized. A few other articles focused on the levels of professional autonomy and decision-making capacity required to optimize direct access to dental hygienist care. One US-based survey of eight states indicated that age, education level, and gender may affect a dental hygienist’s level of autonomy, but overall, registered dental hygienists are prepared to work independently [94]. Another US-based study examined different levels of autonomy from direct supervision to full independence and found that the most consistent increases in utilization of independent practice was associated with preventive care services, rather than more intensive treatments [95]. A Canadian study surveyed dental hygienists and suggested that decision-making capacity for independent practice may have some correlation with length of educational training [96]. Related, two commentaries, one from the US [97] and one from the UK [98], both indicated that advancing direct access or independent practice policies requires dental hygienist training programs to adapt educational curricula and incorporate more opportunities for practical experience and interprofessional education.

In light of expansion of the scope of practice for dental hygienists, there was also a collection of articles from four different countries that highlighted misunderstandings of the dental hygienist role and scope of practice as part of a broader dental team. A commentary on the American context noted the importance of re-positioning the role of dental hygienists ‘beyond cleaning teeth’ [99], while a UK-focused commentary highlighted the lack of recognition of dental hygienist skills and the associated negative impacts on the profession and oral health outcomes [100]. Two original research articles also emphasized the misunderstanding of the dental hygienist role. A Finnish qualitative study involved interviews with dental hygienist educators and noted the mismatch between the role of dental hygienists in dental teams and their evolving scope of practice [101]. A Japanese survey noted a lack of clarity on dental team members’ roles/scope of practice [102].

Opportunities for the dental hygiene workforce

Another important thematic category captured opportunities to expand supply of the dental hygienist workforce through alternative workforce models involving different sectors/settings and populations. One American author summarized the evolving opportunities for dental hygienists with the following editorial extract:

“As our health care system continues to evolve, I feel confident there will be increasing opportunities for dental hygienists to contribute to the triple aim of improving patient experiences, improved population health, and reduced costs of care. Dental hygienists can contribute to achieving the triple aim through expanded scope of practice especially for vulnerable populations; integration into primary care and other alternative settings such as long-term care facilities, hospitals, community-based programs, and home residences; and through leadership roles at the local, state, and national levels.” [103].

Reference to alternative models was also evident in several other USA-based articles [6, 104,105,106], with focus ranging from analyses of alternative workforce models [104] to the requirements to set up and operationalize them [105, 107, 108] to the importance of collaborative practice [97, 109].

There were many calls for the dental hygienist profession to be prepared for new opportunities, particularly related to different sectors/settings and populations. Reviewed articles acknowledged opportunities in public health [110, 111], primary care [112], long-term care [113], hospitals [114], and mobile outreach [115]. Two articles also highlighted non-clinical roles including research, education and leadership [2, 103]. Common themes across all these articles were the need to learn new skills and work with interprofessional teams.

The reviewed articles also identified specific populations that could represent greater potential demand for dental hygienist services, including a range of vulnerable or underserved populations, such as geriatric [93, 113, 116,117,118,119,120] and pediatric [87, 116, 121,122,123] populations, persons with disabilities [124], those living in rural/remote areas [107, 115, 125], Indigenous peoples [115, 125], and incarcerated people [126].

Lastly, a recent submission from the Canadian Dental Hygienists Association to the Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on Health anticipated the important role dental hygienists can play as part of the federal government’s new investment into a federal dental program [127].

Limitations

Several methodological limitations should be considered. First, to encompass a wide range of issues affecting dental hygienist demand and supply, the review permitted various article types, including non-research articles. This approach, however, meant that the methodological quality of all included articles could not be assessed, particularly non-research articles like commentaries. However, the methodologies of the 102 original research, analysis, and review articles were all documented. Second, the focus on high-income countries, while relevant to the overarching objectives, limits the applicability of the findings for lower- and middle-income countries. Third, by restricting the review to the past 10 years, the aim was to capture current challenges and solutions, but this may have omitted important studies published before 2013. Lastly, the review process, primarily conducted by one researcher, could potentially introduce biases or inconsistencies. To mitigate this, a second reviewer screened and assessed a subset of records, to calibrate the application of the review eligibility criteria.

Conclusions

This scoping review systematically explored the factors impacting the demand for and supply of dental hygienists, focusing primarily on high-income countries. The review aimed to identify key factors impacting this workforce, understand regional variations, and provide insights into future trends. The review encompassed 148 articles, with 102 employing a range of research methodologies representing 13 high-income jurisdictions but was predominated by surveys from the United States. Ultimately, the review provided a comprehensive documentation of the current state of the dental hygienist workforce, compiling factors affecting demand and supply, and highlighting opportunities for the dental hygienist workforce in Canada and other high-income countries. The findings offer a foundation for future research, highlighting the need for more focused and rigorous reviews and underscoring the necessity of high-quality studies to verify the effectiveness of various interventions and policies. This is crucial to address dental hygienist workforce challenges and ensure the sustainability and effectiveness of oral health care delivery.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its Additional File 2, Additional File 3).

Abbreviations

CINAHL:

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature

COVID-19:

Coronavirus Disease 2019

PRISMA ScR:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews

UK:

United Kingdom

URL:

Uniform Resource Locator

USA:

United States of America

References

  1. Institute of Medicine. Allied Health Services. Avoiding crises. Washington, DC: The National Academies; 1989. https://doi.org/10.17226/769

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen D, Hayes M, Holden A. A global review of the education and career pathways of dental therapists, dental hygienists and oral health therapists. Br Dent J. 2021https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-2836-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dental Workforce Advisory Group for England. The future oral and dental workforce for England: Liberating human resources to serve the population across the life-course. London, UK: Health Education England. 2019; https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/FDWF Report - 7th March 2019.pdf

  4. Kanji Z, Laronde DM. Career outcomes of dental hygiene baccalaureate education: a study of graduates’ professional opportunities, further education, and job satisfaction. J Dent Educ. 2018;82(8):809–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Centre for Workforce Intelligence. Securing the future workforce supply: Dental care professionals stocktake. London, UK: Centre for Workforce Intelligence. 2014; https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a818686ed915d74e33feaf2/CfWI_Dental_care_professionals_stocktake.pdf

  6. Battrell A, Lynch A, Steinbach P. The American Dental Hygienists’ Association leads the Profession into 21st Century Workforce opportunities. J Evidence-Based Dent Pract. 2016;1(6S):4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaudhary FA, Fazal A, Ahmad B, Khattak O, Hyder M, Mohsin Javaid M, et al. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the Psychological Health and Dental Practice of Oral Healthcare Workers: a scoping review. Risk Manage Healthc Policy. 2022;15:1421–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson-Collins C, Boyd LD, Jenkins SJ. Clinical Dental hygienists’ experience returning to Work after Closure of Dental offices due to COVID-19: a qualitative study. J Dent Hyg. 2022;96(6):6–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Expósito-Delgado AJ, Ausina-Márquez V, Mateos-Moreno MV, Martínez-Sanz E, Trullols-Casas MdC, Llamas-Ortuño ME, et al. Delivery of Health Care by Spanish Dental hygienists in private and Public Dental Services during the COVID-19 De-escalation Phase (June 2020): a cross-sectional study. Specialty Care Dentistry. 2022;42:592–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morrissey RW, Gurenlian JR, Estrich CG, Eldridge LA, Battrell A, Lynch A, et al. Employment patterns of Dental hygienists in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic: an update. J Dent Hyg. 2022;96(1):27–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Daudt HML, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Amarasena N, Teusner DN, Brennan DS, Satur J. Practice characteristics and service provision rates of dental hygienists in Australia. Int J Dental Hygiene. 2018;16:125–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. James Y. Introduction to the health workforce in Canada: Dental assistants, hygienists and therapists. In Introduction to the Health Workforce in Canada, Bourgeault IL, editor. Canadian Health Workforce Network. 2021; https://www.hhr-rhs.ca/images/Intro_to_the_Health_Workforce_in_Canada_Chapters/06_Dental_Asst_Hygienists_Therapists.pdf

  17. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Health Workforce in Canada, 2017 to 2021: Overview — Data Tables. Ottawa, ON: CIHI. 2022; https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/health-workforce-canada-2017-2021-overview-data-tables-en.xlsx. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  18. Ordre des Hygiéists Dentaires du Québec. Rapport annuel 2021–2022 - Ordre des hygienistes dentaires du Quebec. Ordre des Hygiéists Dentaires du Québec (OHDQ). 2022; https://ohdq.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Rapport_annuel_2021-2022_Publie-1.pdf

  19. Olson H, Ratnayake J, Veerasamy, Quaranta A, Meldrum A. Working characteristics for practising dental hygienists in two countries in different hemispheres. Int J Dental Hygiene. 2020;20:209–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee HJ, Shin SJ, Bae SM, Shin BM. Issues and challenges of Dental Hygienist Workforce Policy in Korea. J Korea Contents Association. 2019;19(2):409–23.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Traul R. 2019–2020 workforce survey of dental hygienists. Fla Department Health. 2023; https://www.floridahealth.gov/programs-and-services/community-health/dental-health/reports/_documents/florida-workforce-survey-report-of-dental-hygienists-2019-2020.pdf

  22. Medlock C, Jamison R, Maxey HL. 2022 Indiana Dental Hygienist Brief (2023). Bowen Center for Health Workforce Research and Policy. Indiana University School of Medicine. 2023; https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/items/f85020cc-c664-492c-976c-87aba9d9ac5b/full

  23. Reynolds JC, McKernan SC, Adekugbe O, Sukalski JMC, Kuthy RA. Dental Hygiene Workforce in Iowa: current capacity and implications for Access to Care for the Underserved. Univ Iowa Public Policy Cent. 2019. https://doi.org/10.17077/rep.001115. https://ppc.uiowa.edu/sites/default/files/dental_hygiene_workforce_capacity_access.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Executive Office of Health and Human Services. Massachusetts health professions data series: dental hygienist 2013. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Public Health. 2014; https://www.mass.gov/doc/the-massachusetts-health-professions-data-series-dental-hygienists-0/download. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  25. Minnesota Department of Health, Office of Rural Health and Primary Care. Dental Hygienist Fact Sheet. Minnesota Department of Health. 2019; https://www.health.state.mn.us/data/workforce/oral/docs/2019denthygchart.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  26. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, National Center for Health Workforce Analysis. National and State-Level projections of dentists and Dental hygienists in the U.S., 2012–2025. Maryland: Rockville; 2015. https://bhw.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/bureau-health-workforce/data-research/national-state-level-projections-dentists.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  27. National Center for Health Workforce Analysis. Oral health workforce projections, 2017–2030: dentists and dental hygienists. US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration. 2019; https://bhw.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/bureau-health-workforce/data-research/oral-health-2017-2030.pdf

  28. Texas Department of State Health Services, Texas Health and Human Services. Texas supply and demand dental projections, 2018–2030. Texas Health and Human Services. 2019; https://www.dshs.texas.gov/sites/default/files/chs/hprc/publications/DSHS_DentalProjections_092019.pdf

  29. Jean G, Kruger E, Tennant M. The distribution of allied dental practitioners in Australia: socio-economics and rurality as a driver of better health service accessibility. Aust Dent J. 2019;64:153–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schwendicke F, Jäger R, Hoffmann W, Jordan RA, van den Berg N. Estimating spatially specific demand and supply of dental services: a longitudinal comparison in Northern Germany. J Public Health Dent. 2016;76:269–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. University of Hong Kong. Mind the gap? Projecting demand and supply of healthcare professionals. University of Hong Kong, School of Public Health. 2014.

  32. Food and Health Bureau. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government. Strategic review on healthcare manpower planning and professional development. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government. 2017; https://www.healthbureau.gov.hk/download/press_and_publications/otherinfo/180500_sr/e_sr_final_report.pdf

  33. Gurenlian JR, Morrissey R, Estrich CG, Battrell A, Bessner SK, Lynch A, et al. Employment patterns of Dental hygienists in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Dent Hyg. 2021;95(1):17–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Canadian Dental Hygienists Association. Healthy & respectful workplace. Canadian Dental Hygienists Association. 2018; https://www.cdha.ca/cdha/Career_folder/Healthy___Respectful_Workplace/CDHA/Career/Healthy_Workplace/Healthy___Respectful_Workplace.aspx. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  35. Ghoneim A, Parbhakar KK, Farmer J, Quinonez C. Healthy and respectful workplaces: the experiences of dental hygienists in Canada. JDR Clin Translational Res. 2022;7(2):194–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Geisinger ML, Dershewitz SL. Worried sick: anxiety, depression, and the impact on dental health care workers. J Dent Hyg. 2022;96(4):6–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rolander B, Wåhlin C, Johnston V, Wagman P, Lindmark U. Changes in division of labour and tasks within public dentistry: relationship to employees work demands, health and work ability. Acta Odontol Scand. 2016;74(6):471–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hallett G, Witton R, Mills I. A survey of mental wellbeing and stress among dental therapists and hygienists in South West England. Br Dent J. 2022https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-5357-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Johnson K, Gurenlian J, Garland K, Freudenthal J. State Licensing Board Requirements for Entry into the Dental Hygiene Profession. J Dent Hyg. 2020;94(2):54–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. American Dental Hygienists Association. License portability. American Dental Hygienists Association. 2023; https://www.adha.org/advocacy/license-portability/. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  41. Maxey HL, Norwood CW, O’Connell JB, Liu Z. Impact of State Workforce policies on Underserved patients’ Access to Dental Care: a longitudinal study. J Dent Hyg. 2017;91(5):26–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. International Federation of Dental Hygienists. Working abroad as a dental hygienist: Switzerland. 2014; https://ifdh.org/switzerland. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  43. International Federation of Dental Hygienists. Working abroad as a dental hygienist: UK. 2022; https://ifdh.org/united-kingdom. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  44. International Federation of Dental Hygienists. Working abroad as a dental hygienist: USA.2023; https://ifdh.org/usa. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  45. International Federation of Dental Hygienists. Working abroad as a dental hygienist: Finland. 2020; https://ifdh.org/finland. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  46. International Federation of Dental Hygienists. Working abroad as a dental hygienist: Sweden. 2020; https://ifdh.org/sweden. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  47. International Federation of Dental Hygienists. Working abroad as a dental hygienist: Germany. 2017; https://ifdh.org/germany. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  48. International Federation of Dental Hygienists. Working abroad as a dental hygienist: Spain. 2023; https://ifdh.org/spain. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  49. International Federation of Dental Hygienists. Working abroad as a dental hygienist: Australia. 2020; https://ifdh.org/australia. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  50. International Federation of Dental Hygienists. Working abroad as a dental hygienist: Japan. 2020; https://ifdh.org/japan. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  51. International Federation of Dental Hygienists. Working abroad as a dental hygienist: Canada. 2023; https://ifdh.org/canada. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  52. International Federation of Dental Hygienists. Working abroad as a dental hygienist: Korea. 2013; https://ifdh.org/korea. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  53. Kanji Z, Laronde DM. Motivating influences and ability-based outcomes of dental hygiene baccalaureate education in Canada. Int J Dental Hygiene. 2018;16:329–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Westphal Theile C. Strengths and weaknesses of the current Dental Hygiene Educational System. J Dent Educ. 2017;81(9 Suppl):eS38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Battrell A, Lynch A, Steinbach P, Bessner S, Snyder J, Majeski J. Advancing education in Dental Hygiene. J Evidence-Based Dent Pract. 2014;14(Suppl 1):209–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Maxey HL, Farrell C, Gwozdek A. Exploring current and future roles of Non-dental professionals: implications for Dental Hygiene Education. J Dent Educ. 2017;81(9):eS53eS58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sunell S, Laronde DM, Kanji Z. Fourth-year dental hygiene students’ educational preparedness: self-confidence ratings of the Canadian Dental Hygienists Association baccalaureate competencies (2017–2019). J Dent Educ. 2021;85:768–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. DeRosa Hays R, Moglia Willis S. The Baccalaureate as the Minimum Entry-Level Degree in Dental Hygiene. J Dent Hyg. 2021;95(6):46–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Neville P. The academization of dental hygiene: exploring the experiences of dental hygiene educators and leaders overseeing the transition to a degree programme. International Symposium on Dental Hygiene 2022. 2022; https://isdh2022.com/programme-schedule

  60. Boge E. Benefits of a dental hygienist obtaining a baccalaureate degree: A qualitative research study of licensees in five midwestern states (Session O-116). International Symposium on Dental Hygiene 2022. 2022; https://isdh2022.com/programme-schedule. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  61. Kim JH, Hwang TY. Development of job performance assessment tool for dental hygienists. J Korean Soc Dent Hygiene. 2013;13(5):713–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Nomura Y, Okada A, Miyoshi J, Mukaida M, Akasaka E, Saigo K, et al. Willingness to work and the Working Environment of Japanese Dental hygienists. Int J Dent. 2018;1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2727193

  63. Kang HS, Jung YR, Cho YY. Survey on the working environment of national clinical dental hygienists. J Korean Soc Dent Hygiene. 2018;18(6):863–78.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kim HJ, Kim YJ, Kim MH. A study of factors related to job satisfaction affecting Service Year: a Dental Hygienist in Seoul. J Dent Hygiene Sci. 2014;14(4):510–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Yang JA, Lim SR, Cho YS. Development of scale of long-term employment intention for dental hygienist. J Korean Soc Dent Hygiene. 2017;17(6):1025–35.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Seong MG, Kim YR. Comparison of job satisfaction, turnover intention, and job performance by dental hygienists’ clinical assistance and preventive work. J Korean Soc Dent Hygiene. 2019;19(2):221–9.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Min HH, Jeon JH, Kim YS. Influencing factors of turnover intention in the clinical dental hygienists. J Korean Soc Dent Hygiene. 2015;15(5):831–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Nomura Y, Okada A, Yamamoto Y, Kakuta E, Tomonari H, Hosoya N, et al. Factors behind leaving the job and rejoining it by the Japanese Dental Hygienist. Open Dentistry J. 2020;14:355–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Usui T, Miura H. Workforce re-entry for Japanese unemployed dental hygienists. Int J Dental Hygiene. 2015;13:74–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Patel BM, Boyd LD, Vineyard J, LaSpina L. Job satisfaction, Burnout, and intention to leave among Dental hygienists in clinical practice. J Dent Hyg. 2021;95(2):28–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Bercasio LV, Rowe DJ, Yansane AI. Factors Associated with Burnout among Dental hygienists in California. J Dent Hyg. 2020;94(6):40–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Haslam SK, Wade A, Macdonald LK, Johnson J, Rock LD. Burnout syndrome in Nova Scotia dental hygienists during the COVID-19 pandemic: Maslach Burnout Inventory. Can J Dent Hygiene. 2022;56(2):63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Anishchuk S. Examining the relationship between burnout and empathy in healthcare professionals: A systematic review (Session O-312). International Symposium on Dental Hygiene 2022. 2022; https://isdh2022.com/programme-schedule. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  74. Yun MH, Min HH. Factors influencing burnout in clinical dental hygienists. J Korean Soc Dent Hygiene. 2019;19(6):975–82.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Reynolds JC, McKernan SC, Kuthy RA. Predictors of multiple jobholding among Dental hygienists in the state of Iowa. J Dent Hyg. 2021;95(1):43–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Lee SS. Professionalism and job satisfaction in dental hygienists. J Korean Soc Dent Hygiene. 2013;13(4):535–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Park JH, Lim SR. A qualitative study on job satisfaction of Dental hygienists with Low Experience. J Dent Hygiene Sci. 2020;20(3):163–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Chen D, Hayes MJ, Holdern ACL. Investigation into the enablers and barriers of career satisfaction among Australian oral health therapists. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2022;51:301–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Yamamoto Y, Nomura Y, Okada A, Kakuta E, Yoshida N, Hosoya N, et al. Improvement of Workplace Environment that affects motivation of Japanese Dental hygienists. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(1309):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  80. LaSpina L, August J, Morrison P, Soal K, Pelullo K. A survey of Massachusetts Dental hygienists: practice settings, interest in Educational Advancement, and Career satisfaction in all settings. J Dent Hyg. 2017;91(2):62.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Coplen AE, Bell KP. Barriers faced by expanded practice Dental hygienists in Oregon. J Dent Hyg. 2015;89(2):91–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Mackey JT. Advocacy victories across the country. ADHA Access. American Dental Hygienists Association; 2019.

  83. Feng X, Sambamoorthi U, Wiener RC. Dental workforce availability and dental services utilization in Appalachia: a geospatial analysis. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017;45:145–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Oral Health Workforce Research Center, Center for Workforce Studies, School of Public Health, University at Albany - State University of New York. Variation in dental hygiene scope of practice by state. University at Albany - State University of New York. 2016; https://oralhealthworkforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Single-Page-Layout-Final-2019.pdf

  85. Langelier M. The impact of changing workforce models on access to oral health care services. Oral Health Workforce Research Center, Center for Workforce Studies, School of Public Health, University at Albany - State University of New York. 2018; https://www.oralhealthworkforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/OHWRC_Harvard_10_2018.pdf

  86. Langelier M, Moore J, Continelli T. Dental hygiene scope of practice: Developing a measurement tool, finding associations with oral health outcomes, and informing policy change. Oral Health Workforce Research Center, Center for Workforce Studies, School of Public Health, University at Albany - State University of New York. 2021; https://www.chwsny.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Scope-of-Practice-Symposium_2021_Final.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  87. Simmer-Beck M, Walker M, Gadbury-Amyot C, Liu Y, Kelly P, Branson B. Effectiveness of an alternative Dental Workforce Model on the oral health of low-income children in a School-based setting. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(9):1763–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Teusner DN, Amarasena N, Satur J, Chrisopoulos S, Brennan DS. Applied scope of practice of oral health therapists, dental hygienists and dental therapists. Aust Dent J. 2015;61:342–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Naughton DK. Expanding oral Care opportunities: direct Access Care provided by Dental hygienists in the United States. J Evidence-Based Dent Pract. 2014;1(4S):171–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. ADHA Illinois Dental Hygienists’ Association. Public health dental hygienist direct access states and year(s) direct services were enacted. ADHA Illinois Dental Hygienists’ Association. 2020; https://idha.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/Direct Access to Care From DH.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  91. UK General Dental Council. Guidance on direct access, UK General Dental Council. 2020; https://www.gdc-uk.org/docs/default-source/direct-access/direct-access-guidance.pdf?sfvrsn=f45d8a83_4. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  92. Biazar J. How we practice today: direct access. ADHA Access. American Dental Hygienists Association; 2020.

  93. Monaghan NP, Morgan MZ. What proportion of dental care in care homes could be met by direct access to dental therapists or dental hygienists? Br Dent J. 2015;219(11):531–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Catlett A. Attitudes of Dental hygienists towards Independent Practice and Professional Autonomy. J Dent Hyg. 2016;90(4):249–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Chen J, Meyerhoefer CD, Timmons EJ, The Effects of Dental Hygienist Autonomy on Dental Care Utilization. Center for Growth and Opportunity, Utah State University.2020; https://www.thecgo.org/research/the-effects-of-dental-hygienist-autonomy-on-dental-care-utilization. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  96. Asadoorian J, Forget EL, Grace J, Torabi M. Exploring dental hygiene decision making: a qualitative study of potential organizational explanations. Can J Dent Hygiene. 2019;53(1):7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Bell K. Interprofessional Education: preparing dental hygienists to practice in the evolving health care world. J Dent Hyg. 2019;93(5):4–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Quach JDD, Davda LS, Radford DR, Louca C. Are dental schools doing enough to prepare dental hygiene & therapy students for direct access? Br Dent J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41407-020-0471-1:pp36-37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Draper CK. Defining the Profession in the 21st Century. J Dent Hyg. 2021;95(6):4–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Ross MK. A forgotten workforce? Br Dent J. 2022;233(6):440–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Virtanen JI, Pellikka E, Singh S, Widström E. The professional role of a dental hygienist in Finland – educators’ views. Int J Dental Hygiene. 2016;14:231–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Muroga R, Tsuruta J, Morio I. Disparity in perception of the working condition of dental hygienists between dentists and dental hygiene students in Japan. Int J Dental Hygiene. 2015;13:213–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Battani K. What does research tell us about the future of dental hygiene? J Dent Hyg. 2018;92(2):4–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. ADEA Advocacy and Government Relations Portfolio. Alternative workforce models. ADEA Advocacy and Government Relations Portfolio. 2014; https://www.adea.org/uploadedFiles/ADEA/Content_Conversion_Final/policy_advocacy/Documents/emailDist/Jan_2014_Alt_Workforce_Chart.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  105. Minnesota Department of Health, Office of Rural Health and Primary Care. Understanding collaborative dental hygiene practice in Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Health. 2021; https://www.health.state.mn.us/data/workforce/oral/docs/2021ucdhpmn.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  106. Young K, Knight D, Atkinson J, Lewis M. Exploring alternative workforce models with dental hygiene students (Session O-107). International Symposium on Dental Hygiene 2022. 2022; https://isdh2022.com/programme-schedule. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  107. Moibi N, Jahnke D. Oral health workforce: trends and pipeline incentives. Minnesota Department of Health. 2018; https://www.health.state.mn.us/data/workforce/oral/docs/2018oralhealthwkfc.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  108. North Carolina Oral Health Collaborative. North Carolina Oral Health Collaborative Policy Brief: A Roadmap for Increasing Oral Health Access in North Carolina. North Carolina Oral Health Collaborative. 2020; https://drive.google.com/file/d/109TC0av7PfGuQP9K4EaMnzt_RQ5DAChK/view. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  109. Lawlor S. Interprofessional practice: enhancing the dental hygienist’s role. Can J Dent Hygiene. 2013;47(1):11–3.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Rainchuso L, Salisbury H. Public Health Dental Hygienists in Massachusetts: a qualitative study. J Dent Hyg. 2017;91(3):31–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Isman BA, Farrell CM. Are Dental Hygienists prepared to work in the changing Public Health Environment? J Evidence-Based Dent Pract. 2014;1(4S):183–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Fried JL, Maxey HL, Battani K, Gurenlian JR, Byrd TO, Brunick A. Preparing the Future Dental Hygiene workforce: knowledge, skills, and Reform. J Dent Educ. 2017;81(9 Suppl):eS45–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Yakiwchuk CP. A multi strategy approach for RDHs to champion change in long term care. Can J Dent Hygiene. 2013;47(2):84–8.

    Google Scholar 

  114. American Dental Hygienists Association. Dental hygienists in a hospital setting, May_June_2016. ADHA Access. 2016; https://pubs.royle.com/publication/?m=21156&i=300966&p=16&ver=html5. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  115. Spring C, Larsson L. Interprofessional mobile outreach to improve health, community involvement and support. International Symposium on Dental Hygiene 2022. 2022; https://isdh2022.com/programme-schedule. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  116. Bell KP, Coplen AE. Evaluating the impact of expanded practice Dental hygienists in Oregon: an outcomes Assessment. J Dent Hyg. 2016;90(Suppl 1):33–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Dahm TS, Bruhn A, LeMaster M. Oral care in the long-term care of older patients: how can the Dental Hygienist Meet the need? J Dent Hyg. 2015;89(4):229–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Brown EJ. Dental Hygienist providers in Long-Term Care: meeting the need. J Evidence-Based Dent Pract. 2016;16S:77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Lindquist L, Seleskog B, Wardh I, von Bultzingslwen I. Oral care perspectives of professionals in nursing homes for the elderly. Int J Dental Hygiene. 2013;11:298–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Grandjean ML. The future of the geriatric oral health care is in the hands of the hygienists. International Symposium on Dental Hygiene 2022. 2022; https://isdh2022.com/programme-schedule. Accessed 15 Aug 2023yyyy.

  121. Teusner DN, Amarasena N, Satur J, Chrisopoulos S, Brennan DS. Dental service provision by oral health therapists, dental hygienists and dental therapists in Australia: implications for workforce modelling. Community Dent Health. 2016;33:15–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Isong I, Dantas L, Gerard M, Kuhlthau K. Oral Health disparities and Unmet Dental needs among Preschool Children in Chelsea, MA: exploring mechanisms, defining solutions. J Oral Hygiene Health. 2014;2:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Moravec L, Betts K. Integrating oral health care into primary care well child visits: An interprofessional model of care. International Symposium on Dental Hygiene 2022. 2022; https://isdh2022.com/programme-schedule. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  124. Jones DM, Miller SR. Effectiveness of an Educational Module on Dental Hygiene Students’ attitudes towards persons with disabilities. J Dent Hyg. 2018;92(4):27–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Ontario Dental Association. Remote Areas Program. Ontario Dental Association. 2023; https://www.oda.ca/about-us/remote-areas-program. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  126. Harris JA, Simon L. Which factors are associated with the number of dental providers employed in correctional settings? J Public Health Dent. 2022;82:118–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Canadian Dental Hygienists Association. Submission from the Canadian Dental Hygienists Association to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health: RE study on Canada’s health workforce. Can Dent Hygienists Association. 2022; https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/441/HESA/Brief/BR11741959/br-external/CanadianDentalHygienistsAssociation-e.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was funded by the College of Dental Hygienists of Ontario. Members of the CDHO participated in the conceptualization, review design and preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada

    Mark J. Dobrow

  2. Accessing Centre for Expertise, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada

    Mark J. Dobrow & Angela Valela

  3. College of Dental Hygienists of Ontario, 175 Bloor Street East, North Tower, Suite 601, Toronto, ON, M4W 3R8, Canada

    Eric Bruce, Keisha Simpson & Glenn Pettifer

Authors
  1. Mark J. Dobrow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angela Valela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric Bruce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Keisha Simpson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Glenn Pettifer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: MJD, GP; review design: MJD, EB, KS, GP; search, screening and full-text review: MJD, AV; charting of search results: MJD, AV; analysis and synthesis of search results: MJD, AV, EB, KS, GP; drafting manuscript: MJD; reviewing/revising manuscript: MJD, AV, EB, KS, GP. All authors read and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark J. Dobrow.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Three co-authors (EB, KS, GP) are employed by the College of Dental Hygienists of Ontario which oversees the registration of dental hygienists in Ontario. The remaining authors (MJD, AV) have no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dobrow, M.J., Valela, A., Bruce, E. et al. Identification and assessment of factors that impact the demand for and supply of dental hygienists amidst an evolving workforce context: a scoping review. BMC Oral Health 24, 631 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04392-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04392-6

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us