Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effects of dental anxiety and anesthesia on vital signs during tooth extraction

BMC Oral Health volume 24, Article number: 632 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Anxiety is common preceding tooth extraction; hence, it is crucial to identify patients with dental anxiety (DA) and to manage DA. This study assessed the level of DA and influencing factors in tooth extraction patients in a dental hospital in China and changes in their blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) during the tooth-extraction procedure.

Methods

The study was a cohort study. The Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS) was used to assess the level of DA of 120 patients before tooth extraction. A Demographics and Oral Health Self-Assessment Form was used to assess factors influencing DA. The correlations of DAS scores with HR and BP were measured. The effects of local anesthesia and general anesthesia on HR and BP were also compared using a Datex-Ohmeda anesthesia monitor to detect HR and BP continuously before and after anesthesia. Independent sample t-tests, OLS multiple regression model and one-way analysis of variance were applied to analysis the results.

Results

Based on the DAS score, 12.5% of the participants were identified as suffering from DA. DA was related to age, gender, and the self-assessment of oral health. The DAS score was correlated with increased BP (P < 0.05). BP showed an overall upward trend after local anesthesia, while it was generally stable after general anesthesia. The systolic BP at 4 and 5 min and the HR at 2 and 4 min increased remarkably (P < 0.05) after local anesthesia compared with those before anesthesia. The HR and BP of patients under local anesthesia were generally higher than those of patients under general anesthesia were during the operation.

Conclusions

The prevalence of DA in adults was 12.5% in this study population. DA was related to gender, age, and the self-assessment of oral health. The score of DAS was correlated with BP. Compare to local anesthesia, general anesthesia can make the vital signs of tooth extraction patients more stable.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Dental anxiety (DA), also known as dental fear, refers to all psychological and physiological variations of a more or less strong but not pathological feeling of fear in conjunction with a dentist’s appointment or stimuli relating to dental treatment [1,2,3]. It has been reported that DA is one of the most common barriers to dental treatment, and that approximately 6-25% of the population suffer severe DA, which is associated with dental non-attendance [3,4,5,6]. Persons who avoid dental treatment have more oral diseases and have greater adverse effects on their daily lives from poor dental health, such as their quality of life, appearance, and self-esteem [7, 8]. Research has found that trying to manage patients with DA is a source of fairly substantial stress for many dentists [9]. Moreover, people who delay dental visits for a prolonged time (even when they experience considerable pain) are more likely to have extensive problems that require more complex and complicated treatment [10]. Therefore, DA is an emerging clinical problem that needs to be solved with the development of dentistry.

Tooth extraction is a very basic and widely used operation in dental surgery, and it is also a common treatment for some dental diseases. However, it can cause local tissue damage, bleeding, swelling, pain and other reactions, and can lead to fluctuations in heart rate, blood pressure, and body temperature [11, 12]. Tooth extraction, as an invasive procedure in dental practice, is known to be among the top five most frightening dental procedures [13]. Patients are more worried and anxious about tooth removal than they are about pain or helplessness. Losing a tooth is also a notable stimulus that provokes anxiety, and DA is usually higher among patients having tooth extractions [13, 14]. Despite improvements in dental care, patients usually still have a fear of tooth extraction. This is especially true for children and patients with systemic diseases who have poor pain tolerance, cardiac function, blood vessel elasticity, and other adverse factors. Research aimed at understanding the anxiety of patients and how to ensure their safety before tooth extraction is a relatively new topic.

It is obvious that the anxiety and fear of patients in the dental office should be controlled as much as possible. In order to do this, identifying anxious individuals, affecting factors and their appropriate management becomes of vital importance in clinical practice. One commonly measure is the Corah’s Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS), which is a 4-item tool that asks patients to estimate their level of anxiety in four different dental situations [15]. The questionnaires used in the present study included the DAS to measure the level of DA, and questions about demographic and oral health history to assess the relationship between the DAS score and various factors that influence it. Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were recorded before and after tooth extraction. As anesthesia is essential in tooth extraction, the effects of local anesthesia (LA) and general anesthesia (GA) on the HR and BP of patients undergoing tooth extraction were also compared and analyzed.

This study aimed firstly, to assess the level of DA and influencing factors in tooth extraction patients; secondly, to evaluate the changes in their blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) during the tooth-extraction procedure; and finally, to compare the effect of local anesthesia and general anesthesia on these parameters. The hypothesis of this study is that many people suffer from DA; DA varies with certain demographic characteristics and oral health; the DAS score has correlation with vital signs and general anesthesia can make the vital signs of DA patients more stable.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

We designed a cohort study to investigate the prevalence of DA and the correlation between DAS score and vital signs including BP and HR during tooth extraction. The participants were recruited from patients who underwent tooth extraction between August 2023 and November 2023 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, China). According to the formula for determining the sample size of the survey: n = Z2σ2/d2 (n: Represents the required sample size; Z: The Z-statistic at the 95% confidence level is 1.96; σ: The overall standard deviation is generally taken as 0.5, d: Sampling error). When d = 5-10%, n = 96–384. A total of 120 outpatients undergoing tooth extraction were randomly selected, including 58 males and 62 females. The inclusion criteria were: (1) patients 18 to 60 years-old, and (2) no relevant systemic diseases (American Society of Anesthesiologists’ classifications ASA I and ASA II). The exclusion criteria consist of pregnant women and patients with malignant diseases or mental disabilities. All of the participants were informed consent and asked to finish two questionnaires. The BP and HR were recorded before and after the tooth extraction. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committees of Stomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.

Questionnaire measures

Dental anxiety scale (DAS) [16, 17]

The DAS consists of 4 questions to measure the degree of DA in 4 situations: preparing for a dental visit, waiting in the dentist’s office for treatment, sitting in the dental chair for drilling, and getting ready in the dental chair for scaling. The total score ranges from 4 (not anxious) to 20 (extremely anxious). Patients with a DAS score ≥ 13 were considered to have DA (Appendix 1).

Demographics and oral Health Self-Assessment Form (DOF) [17]

In addition to the DAS, the outpatients were asked to complete a form, which obtained information about demographics and oral health. The demographic information included gender (Male/Female), age (18–30/31–60), level of education (High school or below/ College or above). Two measures of oral health were obtained: a self-assessment of oral health (Healthy/Unhealthy), and a self-assessment of dental treatment needs (Required/Not required) (Appendix 2).

BP and HR measures

The outpatients rested for 5 min after lying on the dental chair and their BP and HR were recorded using a digital BP meter by calculating the mean of many times measure. The LA was 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 ratio of adrenaline for all participants. The administration of LA and the tooth extraction were conducted by one single dental professional at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, China).

Procedures

We designed a retrospective study to determine the effect of anesthesia on vital signs including BP and HR during tooth extraction (Fig. 1). The information of 685 inpatients with tooth extraction by one single dental professional from January 2023 to August 2023 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery was collected, and a total of 279 patients were included based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. An informed consent was obtained by all the participants by phone and/or email. At last, 156 (55.91%) inpatients were admitted including 80 patients (42 males and 38 females) who received LA, and 76 patients (39 males and 37 females) who received GA (Fig. 1). The HR and BP records of the participants during tooth extraction were collected from medical record database. Inpatients who received LA were given a local nerve injection of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride containing a ratio of 1:100,000 adrenaline. Inpatients who received GA were given an intravenous anesthetic, intubated through the oral trachea, and local infiltration anesthesia with a 2% lidocaine hydrochloride injection containing a ratio of 1:100,000 adrenaline at the gingival flap in the mouth after the GA took effect. An anesthesia monitor (Datex-Ohmeda; Crosswell Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) was used to obtain real-time BP and HR data during the tooth extraction procedure.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the screening process. LA: local anesthesia; GA: and general anesthesia

Full size image

Statistical analyses

Descriptive and non-parametric bivariate statistics were used to describe the sample, and continuous variables with normalized distribution were presented as mean with standard deviation. Independent sample t-tests were performed to compare the mean total DAS scores between the groups, regression analysis was performed using an OLS multiple regression model, with DAS score as the dependent variable, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to evaluate the different effects of LA and GA on vital signs including HR and BP. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 19.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and P < 0.05 was set as the level of statistical significance for all the statistical analyses.

Results

Results of questionnaires

The average DAS score was (9.02 ± 3.11). The highest score was 18 and the lowest was 4, and 12.5% of the patients were considered to have DA. The relationships of the DAS score with gender, age, educational level, self-assessment of oral health, and self-assessment of dental treatment needs are shown in Table 1. Compared to males and older adults, females and younger adults were more likely to have DA. Self-assessment of oral health showed significant relationship with DA. The participants who perceived their teeth unhealthy were more anxious. While educational level and self-perceived dental treatment needs were not significantly associated with DA. All the variables mentioned above were included in an OLS multiple regression analysis (Table 2). Gender (95% CI: 0.400, 2.418), and self-assessment of oral health (95% CI: 0.949, 3.122) were positively correlated with DAS score. While age (95% CI: -3.081, -1.015) was negatively correlated with DAS score.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical features of patients and their mean DAS score
Full size table
Table 2 OLS multiple regression model for analyzing DAS
Full size table

The correlation DAS score and vital signs

The relationships of DAS with increased HR and BP are shown in Table 3. The DAS score had a weak non-significant negative correlation with increased HR (P > 0.05), but a significant positive correlation with increased BP including SBP and DBP (P < 0.05).

Table 3 Correlation between increased HR and BP with DAS score (mean ± SD)
Full size table

Changes in BP before and after anesthesia

Both SBP and DBP showed an overall upward trend after local anesthesia (LA) (Fig. 2). SBP remarkably increased (P < 0.05) at 4 and 5 min after LA compared with its level before anesthesia. There was no significant difference in DBP after LA compared with its level before anesthesia (P > 0.05). However, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in SBP or DBP, which were generally stable during the operation in the GA group. The SBP and DBP of patients under LA were generally higher than those under GA during the operation.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Changes in the blood pressure of tooth-extraction patients before and after anesthesia. Real-time SBP and DBP during the tooth extraction procedure was recorded by an anesthesia monitor. *P < 0.05, LA group compared with GA group

Full size image

Changes in HR before and after anesthesia

Overall, HR was higher after LA than GA (Fig. 3). HR was obviously higher at 2 min and 4 min after LA than before LA (P < 0.05). Whereas, after GA, HR fluctuated a little, but there was no statistically significant difference in HR before and after anesthesia (P > 0.05).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Changes in the heart rate of tooth-extraction patients before and after anesthesia. Real-time HR during the tooth extraction procedure was recorded by an anesthesia monitor. *P < 0.05, LA group compared with GA group

Full size image

Discussion

The present study was carried out to assess the level of DA, influencing factors and effects of DA and anesthesia on vital signs during tooth extraction. The results shows that the DA level was 12.5% in this study population; DA was related to gender, age, and the self-assessment of oral health; the score of DAS was correlated with BP; and compare to local anesthesia, general anesthesia can make the vital signs of tooth extraction patients more stable.

Corah’s DAS is one of the most popular psychological scales used to diagnose DA. The DAS has been translated into multiple languages because of its reliability and cross-cultural validity [18, 19]. Its advantages are its brevity, simplicity, being easy to complete, and its cost-effectiveness for research [15, 20]. DA, described as an emotion that helps organisms defend against a variety of threats, arises from a dysregulation of the body’s normal defensive response [21]. This emotion leads to an increase in the secretion of endogenous catecholamines, which results in a rise in HR and BP during extraction. The hemodynamic changes caused by emotional stress mask the alterations caused by exogenously active catecholamines. The main brain area involved is the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Cortisol and catecholamines are released in response to various stimuli, such as: fear, anxiety, and the expectation or experience of pain [22, 23]. It is difficult to describe the prevalence of DA accurately due to study design, sampling methods, setting, and the administration of questionnaires, as well as cultural attitudes and socio-economic variations. Among adults, the prevalence of DA varies widely in the research literature, with its reported prevalence ranging from 4.2% to over 50% [3, 6, 24]. In the present study, the DA prevalence was 12.5%. The methodological diversity or geographical variation can result in this discrepancy to some extent.

Researches have shown that the prevalence of DA varies with certain demographic characteristics [25, 26]. In this study, gender, age, and level of education were selected to analysis the correlation of demographics with DA according to the former theory and the research literatures. Comparison between genders, the DAS scores of females were generally higher than those of males (Table 1). Gender was positively correlated with DAS score (Table 2). Our study results align with the majority of available studies [27,28,29]. The plausible explanation for gender difference could be a combination of emotional and social factors. Women usually had a greater readiness to acknowledge feelings or anxiety while men usually felt embarrassed and tend to hide their anxiety toward dental procedures [27]. Furthermore, it was observed that older people had lower DAS scores than younger people (Table 1). Age was negatively correlated with DAS score (Table 2). It is controversial about the correlation of age and DA. It was found that among age groups, patients who were 24–34 years-old show the highest DAS scores, and the incidence of DA was higher in young people than it was in old people, possibly because there was a general reduction in anxiety as people get older [30]. Yet, some studies, such as Erten et al., have found no statistically significant differences between the mean DAS scores of different age groups [31]. We also found that the individual’s judgment of their oral health was an important influencing factor of DAS scores and people with poor self-assessments of their oral health had higher DAS scores which was consistent with a study conducted in Germany [32]. Whereas DAS scores were not related to level of education or self-perceived dental treatment needs in the present study.

We then examined the changes in BP and HR of outpatients before and after tooth extraction, and the correlations of the increased BP and HR with DA. The results showed that DAS scores had a non-significant negative correlation with increased HR (P > 0.05). In contrast, DAS scores had a significant positive correlation with increased BP (P < 0.05) (Table 3). Furthermore, we used a Datex-Ohmeda anesthesia monitor for continuous measurement of the inpatient’s BP and HR, in order to compare and analyze the effects of LA and GA on the BP and HR of inpatients undergoing tooth extraction. From this experiment, it can be seen that vital signs including BP and HR changed after anesthesia. The tension and anxiety before anesthesia, as well as the pain stimulation during anesthesia, could all cause an increase in sympathetic nerve excitability, leading to the release of more catecholamines from the medulla of the renal gland, which activate receptors in the heart and blood vessels, result in HR and BP rise, and blood oxygen saturation decrease. If not corrected timely, it could cause arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia, and heart failure [33]. The results showed that the use of GA with patients undergoing tooth extraction had less impact on the vital signs than the use of LA. Therefore, the selection of GA for tooth extraction is relatively safer and more reliable than LA, especially for patients with DA. Though pain was eliminated in the patients given LA, the thought of pain may always be present. DA results in nerve excitement and increased catecholamines in the human body, which is manifested as tension, anxiety, and discomfort in tooth extraction. Even after receiving LA, patients have a rapid HR and increased BP [34, 35]. GA inhibits the central nervous system of the entire body, and it not only eliminates the feeling of pain during the operation, it also makes its memory temporarily disappear. Thus, patients under GA will not have psychological problems, such as fear and depression, during the tooth extraction. Therefore, for some patients, such as those with DA, GA is safer than LA, which makes is more suitable for DA patients.

The prevalence of DA, the factors associated with dental anxiety and the relationship with vital sign, which could be of significance to dental practitioners and dental health services. If they are aware about above situations among their patients, they can anticipate patient’s behavior and be better prepared to take measures to help alleviate anxiety, thereby enabling them to pursue better patient management strategies and treatment making. Thus, it is meaningful to further research these topics. Before extraction, we should take effective measures to ensure the surgery is conducted smoothly and safely for DA patients. First of all, the communication between dentists and patients is important. The language of psychological care can reduce the fears of DA patients and enable them to cooperate with the dentist. Secondly, it would be much better to use a Datex-Ohmeda anesthesia monitor or an electrocardiogram monitor during the tooth extraction of DA patients, which can not only detect changes in vital signs of patients at any time, but also improve the patient’s sense of self-security, which alleviates the anxiety of patients to some extent. Thirdly, we should choose suitable anesthetic drugs and methods of anesthesia to reduce the pain of patients, so as to reduce the occurrence of dental phobia and enable patients to receive early, comfortable, and high-quality treatment.

Limitations of the study are insufficient operability of research variables and self-assessment questionnaires can be biased when eliciting responses and fewer anxiety-related factor were assessed, and failure to consider the sampling process in the retrospective clinical study design. In the future studies, larger and more diverse samples should be evaluated, and more anxiety-related factors and Randomized Controlled Trial can be further investigated.

Conclusion

This study found the prevalence of DA in adults was 12.5%. DA was related to gender, age and the self-assessment of oral health. The DAS score had a weak negative and non-significant correlation with increased HR, but it had a significant positive correlation with increased BP. Compare to local anesthesia, general anesthesia can make the vital signs of tooth extraction patients more stable. Since DA is a barrier for regular dental treatment, it is necessary for clinicians and dental health services to identify the patient with DA, select suitable method and well-equipment, which would improve people’s psychological and oral health.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the clinical data and privacy of patients but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ronald AK, Robert KK, Leib DA. Origins and characteristics of fear of dentistry. JADA. 1973;86(4):842–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lin CS, Wu SY, Yi CA. Association between anxiety and Pain in Dental Treatment: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2017;96(2):153–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffmann B, Erwood K, Ncomanzi S, Fischer V, O’Brien D, Lee A. Management strategies for adult patients with dental anxiety in the dental clinic: a systematic review. Aust Dent J. 2022;67(Suppl 1):S3–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon SM, Dionne RA, Snyder J. Dental fear and anxiety as a barrier to accessing oral health care among patients with special health care needs. Spec Care Dentist. 1998;18(2):88–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gatchel RJ, Ingersoll BD, Bowman L, Robertson MC, Walker C. The prevalence of dental fear and avoidance: a recent survey study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983;107:609–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maggirias J, Locker D. Five-year incidence of dental anxiety in an adult population. Community Dent Health. 2002;19:173–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Appukuttan D, Subramanian S, Tadepalli A, Damodaran LK. Dental anxiety among adults: an epidemiological study in South India. N Am J Med Sci. 2015;7(1):13–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hassan BH, Abd El Moniem MM, Dawood SS, Alsultan AA, Abdelhafez AI, Elsakhy NM. Dental anxiety and oral-health-related quality of life among Rural Community-Dwelling older adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(13):7643.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Brahm CO, Lundgren J, Carlsson SG, Nilsson P, Corbeil J, Hagglin C. Dentists’ views on fearful patients. Problems and promises. Swed Dent J. 2012;36(2):79–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tu RY, Liang P, Tan AJ, Tran DHG, He AM, Je H, Kroon J. Factors associated with regular dental attendance by aged adults: a systematic review. Gerodontology. 2023;40(3):277–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Qin Z, Zhou C, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Cao H, Li W, Huang Z. Virtual reality for hypertension in tooth extraction: a Randomized Trial. J Dent Res. 2022;101(4):400–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McArdle BF. Preventing the negative sequelae of tooth extraction. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133(6):742–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oosterink FM, de Jongh A, Aartman IH. What are people afraid of during dental treatment? Anxiety-provoking capacity of 67 stimuli characteristic of the dental setting. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008;116(1):44–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Siegel K, Schrimshaw EW, Kunzel C, Wolfson NH, Moon-Howard J, Moats HL, Mitchell DA. Types of dental fear as barriers to dental care among African American adults with oral health symptoms in Harlem. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23(3):1294–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Corah NL. Development of a dental anxiety scales. J Dent Res. 1969;48(4):596.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Astrom AN, Skaret E, Haugejorden O. Dental anxiety and dental attendance among 25-year-olds in Norway: time trends from 1997 to 2007. BMC Oral Health. 2011;11:10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bedi R, McGrath C. Factors associated with dental anxiety among older people in Britain. Gerodontology. 2000;17(2):97–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pitułaj A, Rajba B, Andrzejewska B, Kiejna A, Dominiak M. Psychometricvalidation of Corah’s Dental anxiety scale in the Polish population. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020;29(1):45–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gil-Abando G, Medina P, Signorini C, Casañas E, Navarrete N, Muñoz-Corcuera M. Assessment of Clinical parameters of Dental anxiety during noninvasive treatments in Dentistry. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):11141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dobros K, Hajto-Bryk J, Wnek A, Zarzecka J, Rzepka D. The level of dental anxiety and dental status in adult patients. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(3):11–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wazzan M, Estaitia M, Habrawi S, Mansour D, Jalal Z, Ahmed H, Hasan HA, Al Kawas S. The Effect of Music Therapy in reducing Dental anxiety and lowering physiological stressors. Acta Biomed. 2022;92(6):e2021393.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Roelofse JA, van der Bijl P. Cardiac dysrhythnias associated with intravenous lorazepam, diazepam, and midazolain during oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52(3):247–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Meyer FU. Haemodynamic changes under emotional stress following a minor surgical procedure under local anaesthesia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;16(6):688–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Silveira ER, Cademartori MG, Schuch HS, Armfield JA, Demarco FF. Estimated prevalence of dental fear in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2021;108:103632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Malvania EA, Ajitkrishnan CG. Prevalence and socio demographic correlates of dental anxiety among group of adult patients attending a dental institution in Vadodara city, Gujarat, India. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(1):179–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schuurs AH, Duivenvoorden HJ, van Thoden SK, Verhage F, Eijkman MA, Makkes PC. Sociodemographic correlates of dental anxiety. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1985;13(4):212–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Enkling N, Marwinski G, Jöhren P. Dental anxiety in a representative sample of residents of a large German city. Clin Oral Investig. 2006;10(1):84–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Firat D, Tunc EP, Sar V. Dental anxiety among adults in Turkey. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7(3):75–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ogawa M, Sago T, Furukawa H. The Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Modifed Dental Anxiety Scale among Dental Outpatients. Sci World J. 2020; 2020:8734946.

  30. Udoye CI, Oginni AO, Oginni FO. Dental anxiety among patients undergoing various dental treatments in a Nigerian teaching hospital. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005;6(2):91–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Erten H, Akarslan ZZ, Bodrumlu E. Dental fear and anxiety levels of patients attending a dental clinic. Quintessence Int. 2006;37(4):304–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Guentsch A, Stier C, Raschke GF, Peisker A, Fahmy MD, Kuepper H, Schueler I. Oral health and dental anxiety in a German practice-based sample. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21(5):1675–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Paramaesvaran M, Kingon AM. AIterations in blood pressure and pulse rate in exodontia patients. Aust Dent J. 1994;39(5):282–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Earl P. Patients’ anxieties with third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;2(5):293–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yildirim O, Turkmenoglu K, Mollaoglu N. Assessment of relationship between hemodynamic changes and anxiety in patients during lower third molar surgery. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2022;32(12):1524–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dental Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang, China

    Diya Zhang

  2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, China

    Shenglai Li

  3. Dongfang College, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, China

    Rui Zhang

Authors
  1. Diya Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shenglai Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rui Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Diya Zhang designed the experiments and wrote the main manuscript text. Shenglai Li conducted tooth extraction and data collection. Rui Zhang was responsible for data analysis and made critical revision. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diya Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the ethics committees of Stomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The trial was registered, approval NO: 2023 (082) and date of approval: 08/14/2023. All participants were informed of the purpose of this study and gave informed consent prior to the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, D., Li, S. & Zhang, R. Effects of dental anxiety and anesthesia on vital signs during tooth extraction. BMC Oral Health 24, 632 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04404-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04404-5

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us