Skip to main content
Download PDF

A comprehensive national survey on malocclusion prevalence among Palestinian children

BMC Oral Health volume 24, Article number: 664 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic features among schoolchildren in the West Bank, Palestine.

Methods

A stratified cluster sample of 1278 schoolchildren (620 males, 658 females, mean age 12 years and 5 months (± 0.5)) were examined. Candidates who had not received any previous orthodontic treatment were only included. Dental anomalies like missing and ectopic teeth were recorded. The anteroposterior occlusal relationship was assessed based on Angle classification. Overjet and overbite were measured. Crowding and spacing were recorded subjectively. In addition, crossbite, openbite, and midline displacement were recorded. The chi-square test and descriptive analysis were used statistically.

Results

The study found Angle Class I molar relationship in 65%, Class II div 1 in 17%, Class II div 2 in 6%, and Class III in 12% of the sample. An overjet (OJ) of more than 4 mm was present in 17%, and 4% had OJ of more than 6 mm; an OJ of at least 0 mm or less in 36%, and 6% had a reverse OJ. A normal overbite was observed in 53%, while 28% had an increase and 19% had a decreased overbite. An anterior openbite (AOB) was present in 9%, and a scissor bite or anterior crossbite in 6% and 14%, respectively. A posterior crossbite was observed in 12% (9% unilateral and 3% bilateral). Midline displacement was found in (9%). Crowding was observed in 35% and 31% and spacing in 24% and 15% of the maxillary and mandibular arches, respectively. A statistically significant relationship between gender and midline shift, a diastema, spacing in the upper arch, and most dental anomalies was found; males were more affected (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

This study reported a high prevalence of malocclusion among schoolchildren in Palestine. A collaborative effort should be directed to obtain more monitoring and surveillance of malocclusion more frequently to prevent and control the exacerbation of the problem.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Malocclusion and subsequent dental discrepancies are considered one of the most frequently reported problems among children and adolescents [1]. Unlike other oral health conditions, malocclusion rarely causes severe pain. It is associated with low quality of life, low self-esteem, and social, psychological and functional disturbances [2]. Many researchers found a significant relationship between malocclusion, poor oral function, poor aesthetic appearance, speech difficulties, periodontal disease, dental caries, Temporomandibular joint disorders, and unfavourable psychological disorders [2].

Most studies measuring the prevalence of malocclusion and related factors depend on epidemiological investigations as a method of choice. The prevalence of malocclusion varies between different countries and geographic regions. The main objective of measuring the occlusal traits is to determine the extent of the health problem and provide the necessary data for setting priorities and developing health policies. Numerous studies have been conducted on the prevalence of malocclusion and the need for treatment worldwide using several indices. Borzabadi-Farahani et al., 2009, studied the prevalence of malocclusion and occlusal traits in 502 Iranian adolescents and found an increased overbite in 34.5%, a severe crowding in the maxillary arch in 16.7%, an angle Class II division 1 in 24.1% [3]. Alkateeb et al., 2005, in a cross-sectional study, examined occlusal traits depending on Bjork et al. methodology and reported an overall prevalence of malocclusion of 92% among Jordanian children aged 13 to 15, an Angle Class II and III malocclusion in 18.8% and 1.4%, crowding in 50.4% and midline shift in 31.7% of their sample [4]. With regard to the considerable variation in the reported prevalence of malocclusions and the minimal data available, particularly in adolescents, the present study aimed to establish the frequencies of the different occlusal traits among adolescents in the West Bank of Palestine.

Materials and methods

Study population

The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Palestinian Health Research Council) (PHRC/HC/998/21). The target population for the present cross-sectional study consisted of 7th-grade Palestinian public-school children in West Bank, Palestine. To meet national needs and international requests, a Palestinian oral health surveillance programme screen public schoolchildren in the 1st (6-year-olds), 7th (12-year-olds), and 10th (16-year-olds) grades. Only data for 7th grade was collected. West Bank has 17 governorates, according to data from the Ministry of Education’s 2019 statistical book. Around 53,247 seventh-grade students were distributed among 1070 schools (454 northern, 254 central, and 362 southern public schools), with 408 female schools, 386 male schools, and 276 mixed schools.

Sample size and clinical examination

To ensure random selection, 69 public schools were chosen from different geographic locations in the West Bank using a stratified selection technique. The sample size was calculated prior to data collection using the expected sample size formula [5]. Assuming the prevalence of malocclusion to be 0.50 in children with and without orthodontic anomaly, a significance level of 5%, power of 95% and a design factor of 1.2 (increasing the sample size by 20%), The result of the equation is multiplied by three domains (northern, central and southern regions of West Bank). The calculated sample was 1384.

The selection criteria for examination included children enrolled in the seventh grade and within the defined age range of 12.0 to 12.9, without any systemic or local health conditions, such as cleft lip and palate, or other syndromes. Exclusion criteria for this study comprised children with a history of orthodontic treatment and/or those who had undergone extraction of any first molars. Following the application of both inclusionary and exclusionary criteria, the final eligible sample comprised 1278 children.

The children were examined at school, under room light, with a mouth mirror, tongue depressor, sharp pencil and triangle set square ruler (for measuring overjet and overbite). For every child, a registration chart related to malocclusion was established which included all variables [6,7,8,9,10,11]. The following parameters and criteria were used in the present study.

Sagittal dimension

Assessment of the anteroposterior molar relationship was based on Angle’s classification. Overjet (OJ) was measured in mm by measuring the distance between the most prominent point on the incisal edges of upper and lower central incisors, considering that the normal value ranged from 2 to 4 mm, increased if it is more than 4 mm and decreased if it is less than 2 mm, and reversed overjet if it is less than 0 [12,13,14]. OJ was recorded as follows: < 0, 0 ≤ to < 2, 2 ≤ to ≤ 4, 4 < to ≤ 6, and > 6 mm. An anterior crossbite (centrals and laterals) also included subjects with a reverse OJ.

Vertical dimension

The overbite was considered normal if values ranged from 2 to 4 mm, increased if it was more than 4 mm and decreased if it was less than 2 mm [12,13,14]. Anterior openbite relationship was noted if all four upper incisors do not overlap any lower incisor in centric occlusion. At the same time, a posterior openbite was recorded when there was a lack of contact between the posterior teeth (premolars and 1st molar).

Transverse dimension

A posterior crossbite was registered when the maxillary premolars and/or molars’ buccal cusps occluded lingual to the mandibular antagonists’ buccal cusps (uni- or bilateral). Teeth that were edge-to-edge were also included. A scissor bite was registered when any of the maxillary premolars or molars occluded with the buccal surface of the mandibular antagonists. Midline shift was diagnosed when the midlines of the maxillary and the mandibular arch are displaced by 2 mm or more regardless of the displacement occurs in the maxillary or mandibular arch.

Alignment anomalies

The presence of crowding, spacing, or diastema was recorded subjectively according to the overlapping of erupted teeth or lack of space over 2 mm for space discrepancies, while diastema was diagnosed when there was a space of at least 2 mm between the maxillary central incisors [6, 15].

Dental anomalies

Anomalies in the dentition were measured by recording the number of missing permanent, ectopic, supernumerary, malformed, and retained deciduous teeth.

No radiograph of any kind was used.

Statistical analysis

Data processing and statistical analysis were undertaken using Statistical Packages for Social Science (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) version 23.0. The chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests examined sexual dimorphism (Angle Classes, OJ, overbite, crossbite, scissor bite, midline discrepancy, and crowding/spacing). A 2-sided α of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Inter-examiner reliability was determined by 14 observers evaluating 32 children on the same day independently from each other. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and its corresponding 95 per cent CI were calculated for the occlusal data. Inter-examiner reliability was tested and found consistent for all measurements.

Results

A total of 1278 children met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 620 were males (48.5%) and 658 were females (51.5%), mean age 12.5 (± 0.5).

Sagittal dimension

According to Angle classification, Class I molar occlusion was found in 65% of children, while Class II and Class III were recorded in 23% and 12%, respectively. OJ of more than 4 mm was present in 17%, and 4% had OJ of more than 6 mm; an OJ of at least 0 mm or less in 36%, and 6% had a reverse OJ. An anterior crossbite was found in 14%. There were no significant differences in diagnosis between males and females (p > 0.05) (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1 Prevalence of molar relationship according to Angle classification
Full size table

Vertical dimension

The prevalence of deep overbite (> 4 mm) was 28% and overbite (2 ≤ to ≤ 4 mm) accounted for the majority. AOB was present in 9% (Table 2).

Transverse dimension

Of the transverse dimension, a midline shift (≥ 2 mm) was recorded in 29%. Males experienced more midline shift (32%) than females (29%, p < 0.05). A unilateral posterior crossbite was found in 9%, while a scissor bite was registered in 6% (Table 2).

Table 2 Prevalence of sagittal, vertical, and transverse occlusal anomalies
Full size table

Alignment and dental anomalies

Alignment and dental anomalies were presented in Tables 3 and 4; the prevalence of crowding of the maxillary or mandibular teeth was 35% and 31%, respectively. 20% of children had both upper and lower teeth crowding. The rate of spacing of the maxillary or mandibular teeth was 24% and 15%, respectively. 9% of the children had upper and lower teeth spacing. Spacing in the maxilla was significantly higher in males than in females (p < 0.05). The prevalence of dental anomalies is reported as background information related to malocclusion classifications. Retained deciduous teeth were found in 30% of children, Ectopic eruption in 19%, and permanent teeth missing due to extraction, trauma, or congenitally in 15%, while malformation and supernumerary were rare. Essential sex differences were observed in ectopic eruption and missing permanent teeth.

Table 3 Prevalence of space anomalies
Full size table
Table 4 Prevalence of dental anomalies
Full size table

The distribution of missing permanent teeth in the participants’ upper and lower dental arches can be followed in Table 5.

Table 5 Distribution of missing permanent teeth
Full size table

Discussion

Malocclusion is a handicapping dentofacial anomaly that affects function and esthetic. It affects the quality of life [16]. Studies assessing malocclusion in children have shown inconsistent results. The divergence in prevalence figures may be due to the different methods of registration, inadequate sample size or variations in sample selection, malocclusion indices used, ethnic origin, the era of research, and the stage of dental development [17].

In this cross-sectional study, a sample of 7th-grade school children was selected to obtain preliminary information on the prevalence of malocclusion in the Palestinian population. Our results show that the prevalence of malocclusion is high among schoolchildren in the West Bank in Palestine. This finding corroborates other studies of the same age group in the Middle East [4, 18, 19]. The molar relationship was classified according to Angle classification, which provides a simple way to classify malocclusions. Our findings show that the Class I molar relationship was the most prevalent in this sample, at 65%. This study confirms that Class I is Palestinian schoolchildren’s predominant sagittal molar relationship. The prevalence of Class II malocclusion was 23% (17% Division 1 and 6% Division 2). The prevalence of Class II malocclusion was higher than in Jordanians [4], Indians [20], and East Africans [21]. Palestinian children also showed the exact prevalence of Class II malocclusion as Colombians [22], Iranians [3], Omanis [19], and Lebanese [23].

The prevalence of Class III malocclusion in this study was 12%. This was in accordance with the previous investigations in Iran [24], but it is higher than the rate of 4.3% reported by Elghoul for the Gaza Strip in Palestine [25]. This difference could be because Elghoul used the summer index, which depends on other criteria. The reported prevalence of subjects with a Class III malocclusion in Saudi Arabia [13], Oman [19], Iran [3], and Turkey [26] was comparable with the present result. Palestinian children also showed a lower prevalence of Class III malocclusions compared with Chinese [27].

An OJ value of at least 0 mm or less was present in 36%, 47% had OJ values between 2 and 4 mm, 17% had an OJ of more than 4 mm, and 4% had an OJ of more than 6 mm. The prevalence of an increased overjet of more than 6 mm was consistent with previous studies in Jordanian and Iranian children [3, 4], but less than that observed in Morocco children 28, and more than that observed in Brazilian children [28]. This difference could be due to the clinical material used. A reverse OJ (negative) was found in 6% of the studied subjects. It was higher than in Jordanian and Iranian children [4, 24].

The prevalence of anterior and posterior crossbites in the present study was 14% and 12% (9% unilateral, 3% bilateral), respectively. Farahani et al., 2009, in a study of malocclusions in Isfahan, Iran, reported corresponding values of 8.4% unilateral and 2% bilateral posterior crossbites comparable with the current findings [3]. The prevalence of unilateral posterior crossbite is often associated with midline shift, which was found in 29% of the children. Males (32%) were more affected than females (26%). It is generally considered that the over-retained deciduous teeth, which rated 30 of the sample, is one aetiological factor of unilateral crossbite and the resulting midline shift, especially in males [29].

Deepbite that exceeded 4 mm was found in 28% of the sample. This was in accordance with the previous investigations in Morocco, Saudi Arabia and India [13, 28, 30], but it was higher than what has been reported in Turkish children and Iranian children, 18.3%, and 17.8% respectively [24, 26]. Most children at this age haven’t finished mandibular growth or have their second molars erupted yet; this may contribute to the increased overbite [1].

AOB was only noticed in 9% of the sample of the vertical anomalies, which is close to findings in studies conducted in Brazil [31], Colombia [22] and Saudi Arabia [13]. The current investigations indicated an increase in the prevalence of posterior openbite (16%). Many children at this age have an incomplete eruption of premolars; this may contribute to the high prevalence of posterior openbite.

Crowding was the most common alignment anomaly in the maxillary and mandibular arches, with a prevalence rate of 35% and 31%, respectively. Spacing was less than crowding and was present in 24% and 15% of the maxillary and mandibular arches, respectively. These results agree with other studies [4, 32]. Although spacing anomalies are not a disease in itself, they can act as a catalyst for other oral disorders, such as periodontal disease, caries, and temporomandibular dysfunctions, depending on the severity of the condition [33].

Males had more generalised spacing than females. This difference was statistically significant. The reason may be that about half of the children in the sample with maxillary spacing had diastema, and eruption of lateral incisors, and canines is slower in males than females, resulting in slower diastema closure [34].

Some limitations should be considered when comparing our results with other studies. Due to different methods and indices applied at varying age ranges among the population. Furthermore, neither impression models nor radiographs were used in this study. The possibility of under or overestimating from data collectors, the frequency of some criteria such as congenitally missing teeth, ectopic teeth eruption and the accuracy of space discrepancies analysis must be considered. Moreover, confounding factors may influence our results, especially in the occlusal examination.

Despite these limitations, this knowledge is essential to understand better Palestinian children’s malocclusion pattern and its relationship to demographic factors. It could be considered as a baseline for further diagnostic and preventive projects.

Conclusion

Class I molar relationship is the most prevalent occlusal pattern among Palestinian schoolchildren. Different patterns of anterior openbite, anterior crossbite, midline shift, diastema, reduced overbite and overjet, spacing, and crowding exist in the West Bank of Palestine. Midline shift and diastema were reported more in males.

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

OJ:

Overjet

AOB:

Anterior openbite

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

WHO:

World health organization

References

  1. Lombardo G, Vena F, Negri P, et al. Worldwide prevalence of malocclusion in the different stages of dentition: a systematic review and meta-analysis sub-ablative laser irradiation to prevent acid demineralisation of dental enamel. A systematic review of literature reporting in vitro studies. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2020;21. https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2020.21.02.05.

  2. Abutayyem H. Psycho-social impacts of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment in adolescent patients. Published Online 2016:356.

  3. Borzabadi-Farahani A, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Eslamipour F. Malocclusion and occlusal traits in an urban Iranian population. An epidemiological study of 11- to 14-year-old children. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31(5):477–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Khateeb SN, Al-Nimri K. Prevalence of malocclusion in 13–15 year-old North Jordanian school children. Community Dent Health ·. Published online 2005.

  5. Pourhoseingholi MA, Vahedi M, Rahimzadeh M. Sample size calculation in medical studies. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2013;6(1):14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Björk A, Krebs A, Solow B. A method for epidemiological registration of malocculusion. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964;22(1):27–41. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356408993963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Angle EH. DDS. Classification of Malocclusion. [Volume 41, Issue 3, March, 1899, pp. 248–264]. The Dental cosmos; a monthly record of dental science: Vol XLI [Vol 41]. Published online 1899.

  8. Salzmann JA. Malocclusion severity assessment. Am J Orthod. 1967;53(2):109–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(67)90226-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Draker HL. Handicapping labio-lingual deviations: a proposed index for public health purposes. Am J Orthod. 1960;46(4):295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(60)90197-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baume LJ, Maréchaux SC. Uniform methods for the epidemiologic assessment of malocclusion. The development of basic methods by the World Health Organization and the Fédération Dentaire Internationale. Am J Orthod. 1974;66(2):121–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90231-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bezroukov V, Freer TJ, Helm S, Kalamkarov H, Sardo Infirri J, Solow B. Basic method for recording occlusal traits. Bull World Health Organ. 1979;57(6):955–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdulaziz Al Hammad DMDZ, Nasser Aldosari DMDM, Tariq Aldebasi DMDW, et al. Malocclusion in Saudi Arabia: a scoping review. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2019;5(1):37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alogaibi Y, Murshid Z, Alsulimani F, et al. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment needs among young adults in Jeddah city. J Orthod Sci. 2020;9(1). https://doi.org/10.4103/JOS.JOS_44_19.

  14. Kinaan BK. Overjet and overbite distribution and correlation: a comparative epidemiological english-iraqi study. Br J Orthod. 1986;13(2):79–86. https://doi.org/10.1179/BJO.13.2.79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998;13(2):97–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1752-7325.2008.00089.X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. WHO. World Health Organization. Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods 3rd Ed, Geneva: 1–53.; 1987.

  17. Salim NA, Al-Abdullah MM, AlHamdan AS, Satterthwaite JD. Prevalence of malocclusion and assessment of orthodontic treatment needs among Syrian refugee children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2021 21:1. 2021;21(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12903-021-01663-4.

  18. Alajlan SS, Alsaleh MK, Alshammari AF, Alharbi SM, Alshammari AK, Alshammari RR. The prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need of school children in Northern Saudi Arabia. J Orthod Sci. 2019;8(1). https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS-104-18.

  19. Al Jadidi L, Sabrish S, Shivamurthy P, Senguttuvan V. The prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in Omani adolescent population. J Orthod Sci. 2018;7(1):21. https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_44_18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma A, Bihani T. Prevalence of Malocclusion in Mewat District of Haryana: a cross-sectional study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(1):90–3. https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10005-2345.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mtaya M, Brudvik P, Åstrøm AN. Prevalence of malocclusion and its relationship with socio-demographic factors, dental caries, and oral hygiene in 12- to 14-year-old Tanzanian schoolchildren. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31(5):467–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thilander B, Pena L, Infante C, Parada SS, De Mayorga C. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescents in Bogota, Colombia. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23(2):153–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/23.2.153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Saleh FK. Prevalence of malocclusion in a sample of Lebanese schoolchildren: an epidemiological study. East Mediterr Health J. 1999;5(2):337–43. https://doi.org/10.26719/1999.5.2.337.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kalbassi S, Aligoudarzi SL, Evaluation of Occlusion and Orthodontic Treatment Needs of Iranian Children Using Index for Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). : A Cross-sectional Study and Review of the Literature. J Res Med Dent Sci. 7(5):39–44. Accessed March 28, 2024. https://www.jrmds.in/articles/evaluation-of-occlusion-and-orthodontic-treatment-needs-of-iranian-children-using-index-for-orthodontic-treatment-need-iotn-a-cros-44360.html.

  25. Elghoul MI. Prevalence of Malocclusion and Orthodontic Treatment needs among Palestinian children in Gaza Strip - Palestine. Alexandaria university; 2007.

  26. Bilgic F, Gelgor IE, Celebi AA. Malocclusion prevalence and orthodontic treatment need in central anatolian adolescents compared to European and other nations’ adolescents. Dent Press J Orthod. 2015;20(6):75–81. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.20.6.075-081.oar.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang Z, Feng J, Wang Q, Yang Y, Xiao J. Analysis of the correlation between malocclusion, bad oral habits, and the caries rate in adolescents. Transl Pediatr. 2021;10(12):3291. https://doi.org/10.21037/TP-21-531.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. De Ridder L, Aleksieva A, Willems G, Declerck D, de Llano-Pérula MC. Prevalence of Orthodontic malocclusions in Healthy Children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19127446/S1.

  29. Rodríguez-Olivos L. Deleterious oral habits related to vertical, transverse and sagittal dental malocclusion in pediatric patients. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):88. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12903-022-02122-4/TABLES/5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bourzgui F, Sebbar M, Hamza M, Lazrak L, Abidine Z, El Quars F. Prevalence of malocclusions and orthodontic treatment need in 8- to 12-year-old schoolchildren in Casablanca, Morocco. Prog Orthod. 2012;13(2):164–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PIO.2011.09.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bárbara E, Fonseca Thomaz A, Cristina M, Cangussu T, Marlúcia A, Assis O. Malocclusion and deleterious oral habits among adolescents in a developing area in northeastern Brazil. Braz Oral Res. 2013;27:62–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Asiry MA, Alshahrani I. Prevalence of malocclusion among school children of Southern Saudi Arabia. J Orthod Sci. 2019;8. https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_83_18.

  33. Hafez HS, Shaarawy SM, Al-sakiti AA, Mostafa YA. Dental crowding as a caries risk factor: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2012;142:443–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.04.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ghimire N, Maharjan IK, Mahato N, Ghimire N, Nepal P. Ocurrence of Midline Diastema among children of different age, sex and race. Open Sci Repos Dent. 2013;Online(e23050409). https://doi.org/10.7392/OPENACCESS.23050409.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Education, the principals of the schools, and the parents and the children who participated in this study.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Preventive Department, Oral and Dental Health Unit, Ministry of Health, Ramallah, Palestine

    Hamsa Amro

  2. Health Sciences Department, Faculty of Graduate Studies, Arab American University, Ramallah, Palestine

    Shahenaz Najjar

  3. Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Pillar Quality and Safety, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium

    Shahenaz Najjar

  4. UBI Business School, Brussels, Belgium

    Shahenaz Najjar

  5. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Europe, Denmark

    Shahenaz Najjar

  6. Faculty of Data Science, Arab American University, Ramallah, Palestine

    Majdi Owda

  7. Private clinic, Ramallah, Palestine

    Firas Elayyan

Authors
  1. Hamsa Amro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shahenaz Najjar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Majdi Owda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Firas Elayyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H. A.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing- Original draft preparation. Sh. N.: Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Reviewing and Editing. M. O.: Co-supervision, Validation, Reviewing and Editing. F. E.: Data curation, Validation, Visualization, Reviewing and Editing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahenaz Najjar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Permission to undertake the survey was obtained from the Ministries of Health and Education. Ethical approval was given from the local ethics committee (Palestinian Health Research Council) reference number (PHRC/HC/998/21). Informed consent was obtained from all participants and guardians. Human subjects’ privacy rights were respected.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amro, H., Najjar, S., Owda, M. et al. A comprehensive national survey on malocclusion prevalence among Palestinian children. BMC Oral Health 24, 664 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04432-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04432-1

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us