Skip to main content
Download PDF

The efficacy and potential mechanisms of pyrotinib in targeting EGFR and HER2 in advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma

BMC Oral Health volume 24, Article number: 898 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) plays an important role in the progression of multiple solid tumors and induces resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) target treatment. However, the expression status and the clinical significance of HER2 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is still controversial. Pyrotinib (PYR) is a promising novel EGFR/HER2 dual inhibitor, whose efficacy in OSCC has not been determined.

Methods

57 locally advanced de novo OSCC patients were included in this study to investigate the relationship between the HER2 expression levels and the prognosis by the tissue microarray analysis (TMA). In vitro and in vivo experiments were performed to retrieve the efficacy of PYR in OSCC. The main downstream of HER2 was evaluated by western blotting in OSCC cell lines and xenograft tumors to explore the potential mechanism of PYR.

Results

This study revealed the primary tumor of OSCC had higher HER2 expression levels. Patients with HER2 overexpression had poor overall survival (P < 0.014) and poor disease free survival (P < 0.042). In vitro, PYR suppressed the proliferation, colony formation and migration of OSCC cells. It also promoted apoptosis of OSCC cells and induced cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, PYR was able to inhibit the occurrence and development of OSCC effectively in vivo. Western blotting revealed that PYR suppressed OSCC by inhibiting the phosphorylation of HER2, AKT and ERK.

Conclusions

This study exhibited the anti-OSCC effects of PYR in vitro and in vivo, and demonstrated PYR inhibited OSCC cells by inducing apoptosis via the HER2/ AKT and ERK pathway. The result of this study also indicated locally advanced OSCC patients might benefit from HER2 assay and EGFR/HER2 dual inhibit treatment.

Peer Review reports

Background

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), classically presents with a non-healing mouth sore or ulcer, is the most common head neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with 350,000 new cases and 170,000 deaths per year [1, 2]. The diagnosis of OSCC must be established by a pathology examination, of which the histopathological spectrum is characterized by the extent of cellular atypia and squamous differentiation [3]. The principal modalities of curative therapy of OSCC are surgery, radiation, systemic therapy, et al [3, 4]. Target therapy, such as varies tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been the important component of systemic therapy in the clinical practice. As a novel oral, irreversible pan-ERBB TKI it is, pyrotinib (PYR) has demonstrated a promising single-agent efficacy and acceptable tolerability in cancer treatment [5, 6].

Although the early stages of OSCC have gained good prognosis despite degraded neck dissection extent [7, 8], the treatment of advanced OSCC is still full of challenges, leading to the poor survival outcomes [9, 10]. In addition to the surgery and traditional adjuvant therapy, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) target therapy provides survival benefits to advanced OSCC patients and is recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline [11]. Until now, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) only approved one EGFR target drug for clinical practice, which is cetuximab. However intrinsic and acquired resistance to cetuximab is frequently encountered in clinics [12]. A novel biomarker for predicting poor prognosis of OSCC and targeting individualized drug delivery is urgently needed to overcome the dilemma, and is the focus of many clinical research studies.

Both HER2 and EGFR belong to the ERBB tyrosine kinases receptor family. The overexpression of HER2 forms heterodimerization with the other ERBB members, leading to the initiation of various signaling pathways by auto-phosphorylating tyrosine residues, and inducing resistance to EGFR target therapy [13]. Multiple clinical trials focusing on HER2-targeted therapies have resulted in exciting outcomes in the treatment of various solid tumors with abnormal expressions of HER2 [14,15,16]. As a robust irreversible EGFR/HER2 dual TKI, PYR has shown remarkable responses in many advanced cancers even with previously failed EGFR/HER2 targeted treatments [17, 18]. Therefore, it is worth exploring whether PYR has the equivalent efficacy in advanced OSCC.

By evaluating the HER2 clinical expression, this study aims to assess the possibility of the application of PYR in OSCC, and to investigate its anti-tumor effects, as well as the potential mechanisms in vitro and in vivo.

Materials and methods

Clinical samples and data

With the approval of the hospital’s ethics committee (keyan20210615-38, Figure S1), we retrospectively enrolled locally advanced OSCC patients with integrated clinical pathological information who accepted the initial curative surgery and standard adjuvant therapy at a tertiary referral hospital between January 2016 and June 2019. All of the included patients signed informed consent for the use of their tissues in this study. The inclusion criteria were de novo stage III or IVa OSCC patients with at least 2 years of follow up or with definitive survival outcome (death or recurrence). Formalin Paraffin Embedded blocks of primary tumor tissues and matched para-tumor normal oral mucosa tissues were used to generate tissue microarray (TMA) for the HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining by an experienced pathologist. These blocks of tumor tissue were selected by the paired hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) stained sections, to confirm the presence of at least 80% tumor cells. Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were regarded as the main outcome variable.

Cell lines, cell culture, reagents and animals

CAL27 (human OSCC cell line) and HN30 (human head neck squamous cell carcinoma cell line) were employed in the current study. Both of the cell lines were kindly provided by Professor Laiping Zhong (Shanghai Jiaotong University, school of medicine). CAL27 and HN30 cells were cultured in a growth medium consisting of 90% DMEM, 10% FBS and 1% antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin). PYR was kindly provided by Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Company (CHN.). All of the primary antibodies were purchased from Cell signaling technology (CST, USA.), including: anti-HER2 (4290&6942), phospho-AKT pathway antibody sampler kit (9916) and phospho-ERK1/2 pathway sampler kit (9911). 4-week-old, 20 to 22 g, male NOD-SCID gamma (NSG) mice were used for the xenografts under the approval of the ethics committee (SRRSH202107123).

Cell proliferation assay

The cell proliferation ability of CAL27 and HN30 was assessed by cell viability and cell colony formation assay, and repeated three times. For cell viability assay, CAL27 and HN30 cells in a density of 1000 cells/well were routinely cultured in DMEM for 12 h in advance of PYR treatment. Then the cells were exposed to various concentrations of PYR or vehicles for 24, 48, or 72 h before undergoing cell counting kit-8 (CCK8, CK04, Dojindo, Japan) as the standard protocol. Survival curves were generated and the IC50 were calculated from the results of the CCK8 assay by GraphPad Prim 7.

For cell colony formation assay, CAL27 and HN30 cells in a density of 500 cell/well were seeded in DMEM for 24 h ahead of the treatment of PYR. These cells would be cultured under different concentrations of PYR for 2 to 3 weeks until obvious cell colonies formed. Cell colonies were then fixed and stained following the common methods. Only the colonies containing more than 50 cells were counted.

Wound healing assay

CAL27 and HN30 were seeded and cultured until the cells grew to a confluent monolayer. A couple of parallel lines were made after starving the cells for 12 h. Then the cells were incubated under 10 μm/L PYR or vehicles for 12 h, and observed at hour 0, 6 and 12. The percentage of the wound closure area was used to reflect the cell migration ability, and calculated by Image J software.

Apoptosis assay and cell cycle analysis

Through the treatment of 10 μm/L PYR, CAL27 and HN30 cells were harvested and fixed for apoptosis assay and cell cycle analysis as a standard protocol. After dual labeling by FITC-annexin V apoptosis detection kit (556,570, BD Bioscience, USA), flow cytometer and FlowJo software (FACSCalibur™, BD Bioscience, USA) were used to evaluate the apoptotic and necrotic OSCC cells following the operation manual. The cell cycle was labeled by PI/RNase (550,825, BD Pharmingen, San Diego, USA), and analyzed by flow cytometer. The expression levels of proteins related to the apoptosis signaling, including cleaved PARP, total caspase 3 and cleaved caspase 3 (9546, 9662,9661, CST, USA.), were examined by western blotting in CAL27 and HN30 cells with or without the treatment of PYR.

Tumor xenografts

The in vivo study was conducted with the approvalof the hospital’s ethics committee (SRRSH202107123, Figure S2). CAL27 cells were harvested and resuspended at 2 × 106 cells/ml cells with DMEM and Matrigel. Each seeded site wasinjected with a total volume of 0.1 ml CAL27 cells resuspension. A total of 8 NSG mice were randomly divided into the control group and the PYR group until the tumor xenografts grew to 100-150mm3. According to the groups, the mice were orally administered PYR solution (10 mg/Kg) or saline daily. The size of the tumors would be measured every other day, until the long diameter of each tumor wasapproaching 1.5 cm (the largest diameter of the tumors was 1.48 cm). Then the mice wereeuthanized by inhalation of 30% CO2 (4.5 L/min) for 2 minutes in a CO2 gas chamber, until they were motionless without breath or heart beating. After stopping the CO2, another 2 minutes observation was performed to confirm the death of the animals [19]. The tumors were harvested for the volume measurement, which was calculated by the following formula: V(tumor volume) = L(tumor length) × W2(tumor width) /2. Ki67 IHC assay was also applied to study the effect of PYR on the proliferation of the xenograft tumors [20].

Western blotting

After the treatment of a gradient concentration PYR or control, CAL27 cells and CAL27 xenograft tumors were harvested for western blotting assay. The expression and phosphorylation level of the key protein in the HER2 cascade was assayed, including HER2, AKT, ERK. Following a standard protocol, total protein was extracted from the harvested samples. In order to ensure the equal loading, Bradford Assay kit (P0006C, Beyotime, CHN) was used to measure protein concentration. After dissolving the protein into SDS-PAGE, the samples were transferred onto a PVDF membrane. The primary antibodies were diluted at a 1:1000 dilution, while the fluorescently labeled anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies (7076 and 7704, CST, USA) were diluted at a 1:10000 dilution. The internal control was established by Î’-Actin (1226, CST, USA).

Immunohistochemistry

IHC staining for HER2 and Ki67 was performed on the TMAs and the xenografts sections, according to standard protocol. A semiquantitative method was used to evaluate the IHC results by assigning a modified H-score to the TMAs samples [21]. The modified H-score was determined by multiplying the gradient percentage of positive cells per TMAs spot (0, 0 ~ 5%; 1,6 ~ 25%; 2, 26 ~ 50%; 3, 51 ~ 75%; 4, > 75%) by the staining intensity (0, negative or trace; 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, intense). The protein expression was defined as high expression when the score was higher than the median score, or else it would be defined as low expression.

Statistical analysis

All of the data was analyzed by SPSS23 (IBM, USA) and GraphPad Prism 7. Pearson’s chi-square test was used to analyze clinical data. The association of HER2 with T stage, Disease stage and Tumor site was determined by Fisher’s exact test. A paired t-test was applied to the paired data. an unpaired t-test or one-way ANOVA was applied according to the all other data category. When comparing two groups, the significance was determined using a student’s t-test. Comparison between multiple groups was determined by a one-way ANOVA test followed by Bonferroni post hot test. Statistically significant P values were indicated as P < 0.05. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference was assessed using the log-rank test [22]. Effect modifications were analyzed by univariate Cox regression analysis when the hazard ratio (HR) was significant (P < 0.05) [23]. The variables eventually selectedfor the multivariate model was determined by the results of an univariate Cox regression analyses and clinical evaluation.

Results

HER2 expression was elevated in OSCC and positive correlated to poor survival.

In order to clarify the foundation of applying PYR in OSCC, a total of 57 locally advanced OSCC patients (44 males and 13 females) with the average age of 56.86 ± 9.7 years were finally included in this study for HER2 assay. The male patients were threefold more than the female in the present cohort, which was accordance with the epidemiological data [3]. While the mean age of the included patients in this study was approximate to some other OSCC or head neck cancer studies [7, 24, 25].

There were 47 stage IVa and 10 stage III patients with mean follow up of 51.65 ± 32.79 months (range: 2.4 ~ 99 months). Out of these patients, 30 patients suffered recurrence and 24 patients died during the follow up. The mean H-scores of HER2 expression in the tumor tissues was significantly higher than the scores in the para-tumor tissues (7.56 ± 3.92 vs. 5.63 ± 2.14, P < 0.05) (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A. The expression levels of HER2 in the primary tumor tissue was significantly higher than the para-tumor mucosa tissue in the current cohort(7.56 ± 3.92 vs. 5.63 ± 2.14, P < 0.05)

B: The low (left) and high expression (right) of HER2 in the primary tumors of OSCC in the TMA;

C-D: Among 57 patients with locally advanced tumors, the OS and DFS of patients with high HER2 expression were significantly lower than those with low HER2 expression, and the difference was statistically significant

Full size image

Tumor tissues of 22 patients were assessed for high HER2 expression, while the others were assessed for low (Fig. 1B). There was no significant difference of the demographic and clinical pathological variables between the high and low HER2 expression groups (Table 1). While Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed both OS (41.7 ± 7.36 vs. 74.6 ± 6.61 m, p < 0.014) and DFS (33.1 ± 6.9 vs. 64.4 ± 7.33 m p < 0.042) were obvious shorter in the patients with high HER2 expression (Fig. 1C-D). The multivariate analysis was adjusted for potentially confounding clinical variables. The HER2 (categorical variable) also had an independent predictive ability for OS (P = 0.003), DFS (P = 0.016)(Table 2).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical data of all patients (N = 57)
Full size table
Table 2 Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for OS and DFS of OSCC patients (N = 57)
Full size table

PYR exhibfited the anti-proliferation and anti-migration effects on OSCC

To investigate whether PYR impaired the proliferation and migration of OSCC cells, cell viability, colony formation and wound healing assays were carried out subsequently in vitro. The result indicated that the viability of CAL27 and HN30 cells was inhibited by PYR in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 2A). The IC50(48 h) of PYR was 3.117 μm/L in CAL27 cells, and was 18.154 μm/L in HN30 cells respectively (Fig. 2B). PYR could significantly suppress the colony formation of CAL27 and HN30 cells in a similar concentration-dependent manner else. Contrasted to the negative control, nearly 80% number of cell colonies of CAL27 and HN30 were suppressed by PYR at the concentration of 5 μm/L, while over 90% colonies were inhibited at 10 μm/L (Fig. 2C-D). As shown in Fig. 2E-F, 10 μm/L of PYR apparently inhibited the cell migration of CAL27 and HN30 cells.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A: CCK8 assay was used to detect the toxicity and proliferation inhibition of PYR in OSCC cells

B: It was found that PYR could effectively inhibit the proliferation activity of OSCC cells, with IC50 = 3.117 for CAL27 and 18.154 for HN30 at 48 h

C-D: The effect of PYR on OSCC clone formation was investigated by monoclonal assay. 5 μm concentration effectively inhibited OSCC clone formation, while 10 μm concentration showed no obvious cell clone formation

E-F: Cell scratch assay showed that 10 μm PYR could effectively decrease the migration of OSCC cells. After 24 h the cell migration ability was significantly different from that of the control group

Full size image

PYR induced cell apoptosis and cell circle arrest in OSCC cell lines

In the PYR group, the proportion of annexin-V-positive CAL27 cells ascended from 6.557 ± 0.522% to 28.477 ± 1.15%, while the proportion of the positive HN30 cells ascended from 11.49 ± 0.97% to 40.63 ± 0.96% (Fig. 3A-B). Flow cytometry assay also revealed PYR led to the cell cycle accumulation in G0/G1 phase, and decreased the approximate 10% proportion of G2/M and S phase cells (Fig. 3C-E). Meanwhile, the treatment of PYR dramatically increased the levels of cleaved caspase 3 and PARP, and decreased the levels of total caspase 3 in CAL27 and HN30 cells (Fig. 3F, Figure S3). Taking together, the result suggested significant cell apoptosis of CAL27 and HN30 cells was induced by PYR, as well as the G0/G1 cell circle arrest.

Fig. 3
figure 3

A-B: Flow cytometry showed that 10 μm PYR significantly increased the apoptosis of OSCC cells (CAL27 and HN30), compared with the control group

C-E: Cell cycle detection showed that 10 μm PYR treated OSCC cells (CAL27 and HN30) significantly increased at G0/G1 phase, indicating that PYR can block OSCC cells at G0/G1 phase

F: The expression levels of proteins related to the apoptosis signaling, including cleaved PARP, total caspase 3 and cleaved caspase 3, was examined by western blotting in CAL27 and HN30 cells treated under various concentrations of PYR for 24 h. The original gels are presented in Supplementary Figure S1

Full size image

PYR inhibited the tumor growth in vivo in CAL27 Xenograft models

8 NSG mice xenograft models were successfully established by injecting CAL27 cells subcutaneously to determine whether PYR could inhibit tumor growth in vivo. The mean harvested tumor volume of the PYR group was significant smaller than the control group’s (67.08 ± 29.54 vs. 247.83 ± 48.00mm3, P < 0.01,Fig. 4A-B), while the body weight of the mice did not have a significant difference between the groups (Fig. 4C). Compared to the control group, the expression level of Ki67 of the harvested xenograft tumor was much lower in the PYR group, implying the inhibited tumor proliferation by PYR in vivo (Fig. 4D-E). In brief, PYR exhibited the robust anti-tumor effect and excellent bio-safety in vivo.

Fig. 4
figure 4

A-C In vivo xenograft experiments in nude mice showed that xenograft tumors in nude mice treated with PYR were significantly smaller than those in the control group, and there was no significant difference in the body weight of the mice

D-E Immunohistochemical results of transplanted tumors HE and Ki67 showed that the proliferation activity of OSCC cells was significantly decreased after treatment with PYR (P < 0.05)

F-G: Gradient concentration of PYR was used to treat CAL27 cells to detect the effect on the PI3K/AKT and MAPK signaling pathway. It was found that PYR could effectively inhibit the phosphorylation level of HER2 protein and the downstream of AKT/ERK, without significant changes in the total protein level. A similar result was observed in vivo as well. The original gels are presented in Supplementary Figure S2A-B

Full size image

The potential anti-tumor mechanism of PYR in OSCC

Since PI3K/AKT and mitogen-activating protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway was regarded as the main downstream of EGFR and HER2, western blotting therefore was employed to validated the effect of PYR in HER2 cascades in vitro and in vivo. Compared to the negative control, PYR dramatically downregulated the phosphorylation of HER2, AKT, and ERK, but did not influent the expression of these proteins themselves(Fig. 4F-G, Figure S4A-B). It suggested the anti-tumor mechanism of PYR in OSCC might be due to inhibit the PI3K/AKT and MAPK cascades by blocking the activation of HER2 protein.

Discussion

The problem of EGFR target therapy resistance is particularly prominent in advanced OSCC, leading to poor prognosis [26, 27]. The overexpression of HER2 plays an important role in inducing resistance to the EGFR target therapy and promotes multiple tumor progression [28, 29]. A variety of HER2 or EGFR/HER2 dual target therapeutic strategies therefore are being explored to overcome the dilemma [30, 31]. Due to the lack of a well-recognized evaluation system, there is some controversy over HER2 clinical expression status in OSCC or HNSCC, limiting the application of HER2 or pan HER2 target therapy in this region [32,33,34].

Compared to the other HER2 testing methods, IHC semi-quantitative testing is more available and much cheaper, and is also recommended by the American society of clinical oncology/college [35]. H score is one of the most commonly used IHC semi-quantitative methods to evaluate the target protein expression level, such as EGFR or HER2, and has been applied in OSCC [21, 36]. Hence this study employed a modified H score to measure the HER2 expression in OSCC, and revealed HER2 was expressed dramatically higher in the primary tumor than the normal mucosa, which was consistent with many previously published studies [37, 38]. In regards to the selection bias for advanced patients, the current cohort was of an integrated survival outcome with a much shorter follow up period, and found that HER2 high expression was positively correlated with poor OS and DFS, indicating HER2 as a promising prognostic predictor and molecular target in OSCC. In accordance with our study, some other relevant researches also indicated that HER2 overexpression might promote the invasion of OSCC and was positive related to the advanced tumor stage [37, 39]. It implied that HER2 might be a bio-mark for the biological behavior of OSCC and could anticipate the prognosis.

HNSCC patients with HER2 overexpression may be benefit from the dual anti-HER2/EGFR target therapy [40]. As an EGFR/HER2 dual inhibitor it is, PYR could partially overcome EGFR resistance [18]. Through aseries of in vitro and in vivo experiments, PYR was found to have a robust efficiency in suppressing the growth of OSCC cell lines and xenograft tumors in a concentration-dependent manner rather than a time dependent manner, especially in the low andintermediate concentration. This suggests that PYR might gain a fast response on OSCC and would be a candidate for neoadjuvant therapy [41, 42]. As indicated by some other studies, our study also found PYR induced cell apoptosis and G0-G1 cell cycle arrest, which meant thecombined application of PYR and chemotherapy might provide morebeneficial to OSCC patients [43, 44].

The PI3K/AKT and MAPK cascades were the main downstream of HER2 and EGFR [45]. The cross talk between the two cascades was regarded as the main mechanism of resistance to EGFR target therapy [12, 40]. Zhao TC et al. indicated growth differentiation factor-15 overexpression promoted OSCC by binding to HER2 and an HER2 phosphorylation inhibitor could suppress OSCC by blocking the phosphorylation of HER2, as well as AKT and ERK in its downstream [46]. In the present study, western blotting revealed that the phosphorylation, but not the expression levels, of HER2, AKT and ERK, were dramatically downregulated in the CAL27 cell line and the xenograft tumors by PYR. This result was consistent with the previous studies of PYR on other tumors, and suggests the potential mechanism of its anti-tumor effect [47, 48].

The current standard therapy for locally advanced OSCC usually loses control of the disease. The HER2 high expression predicts a poor prognosis with high recurrence and mortality, calling for novel systemic therapy. Pan HER2 inhibitors, such as PYR, may provide additional benefits, especially in advanced OSCC patients. Of course, further preclinical studies and clinical trials are needed to verify our findings.

Conclusions

This is the first study to exhibit the anti-tumor effects of PYR on OSCC in vitro and in vivo, and demonstrated PYR inhibited OSCC cells by inducing apoptosis via the PI3K/ AKT and MAPK pathway.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HER2:

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

EGFR:

Epidermal growth factor receptor

OSCC:

Oral squamous cell carcinoma

PYR:

Pyrotinib

TMA:

Tissue microarray

HNSCC:

Head neck squamous cell carcinoma

TKI:

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

FDA:

food drug administration

NCCN:

National Cancer Comprehensive Network

IHC:

Immunohistochemical

OS:

overall survival

DFS:

disease free survival

MAPK:

mitogen-activating protein kinase

NSG:

NOD-SCID gamma

HR:

Hazard ratio

H&E:

Hematoxylin-eosin

CCK8:

Cell counting kit-8

CST:

Cell signaling technology

References

  1. Afrah A, Aldelaimi HHE, Tahrir N, Aldelaimi. Khalil Abdulla Mohammed: tumors of Craniofacial Region in Iraq (Clinicopathological Study). J Res Med Dent Sci. 2021;9(1):5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson DE, Burtness B, Leemans CR, Lui VWY, Bauman JE, Grandis JR. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Aldelaimi TN, Khalil AA. Clinical application of Diode Laser (980 nm) in Maxillofacial Surgical procedures. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(4):1220–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu SM, Tu HY, Wei XW, Yan HH, Dong XR, Cui JW, Zhou Z, Xu CR, Zheng MY, Li YS, et al. First-line pyrotinib in advanced HER2-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a patient-centric phase 2 trial. Nat Med. 2023;29(8):2079–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou H, Lv M, Li W, Wang Y, Wu J, Liu Q, Liu T, Cui Y, Li Q. Efficacy of Pyrotinib With/Without Trastuzumab in Treatment-Refractory, HER2-Positive metastatic colorectal Cancer: result from a prospective observational study. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2024;23(1):58–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zanoni DK, Montero PH, Migliacci JC, Shah JP, Wong RJ, Ganly I, Patel SG. Survival outcomes after treatment of cancer of the oral cavity (1985–2015). Oral Oncol. 2019;90:115–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Garrel R, Poissonnet G, Moya Plana A, Fakhry N, Dolivet G, Lallemant B, Sarini J, Vergez S, Guelfucci B, Choussy O, et al. Equivalence Randomized Trial to compare treatment on the basis of Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Neck Node Dissection in Operable T1-T2N0 oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(34):4010–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rezazadeh F, Andisheh-Tadbir A, Malek Mansouri Z, Khademi B, Bayat P, Sedarat H, Tabesh A, Tayebi Khorami E. Evaluation of recurrence, mortality and treatment complications of oral squamous cell carcinoma in public health centers in Shiraz during 2010 to 2020. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):341.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Higashionna T, Harada K, Maruo A, Niimura T, Tan E, Vu QT, Kawabata T, Ushio S, Hamano H, Kajizono M et al. Trends in Head and Neck Cancer Mortality from 1999 to 2019 in Japan: an observational analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023, 15(15).

  11. Caudell JJ, Gillison ML, Maghami E, Spencer S, Pfister DG, Adkins D, Birkeland AC, Brizel DM, Busse PM, Cmelak AJ, et al. NCCN Guidelines(R) insights: Head and Neck cancers, Version 1.2022. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20(3):224–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Han Y, Peng Y, Fu Y, Cai C, Guo C, Liu S, Li Y, Chen Y, Shen E, Long K, et al. MLH1 Deficiency induces Cetuximab Resistance in Colon cancer via Her-2/PI3K/AKT signaling. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020;7(13):2000112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Uribe ML, Marrocco I, Yarden Y. EGFR in Cancer: signaling mechanisms, drugs, and Acquired Resistance. Cancers (Basel) 2021, 13(11).

  14. Oh DY, Bang YJ. HER2-targeted therapies - a role beyond breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(1):33–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tolaney SM, Tayob N, Dang C, Yardley DA, Isakoff SJ, Valero V, Faggen M, Mulvey T, Bose R, Hu J, et al. Adjuvant trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Paclitaxel in Combination with Trastuzumab for Stage I HER2-Positive breast Cancer (ATEMPT): a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(21):2375–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tabernero J, Hoff PM, Shen L, Ohtsu A, Shah MA, Siddiqui A, Heeson S, Kiermaier A, Macharia H, Restuccia E, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy in HER2-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: end-of-study analysis of the JACOB phase III randomized clinical trial. Gastric Cancer. 2023;26(1):123–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li HS, Yang LL, Zhang MY, Cheng K, Chen Y, Liu JY. Remarkable response of EGFR- and HER2-Amplified metastatic Colon cancer to Pyrotinib after failed multiline treatments: a Case Report and Literature Review. Front Oncol. 2020;10:548867.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Song Z, Lv D, Chen SQ, Huang J, Li Y, Ying S, Wu X, Hua F, Wang W, Xu C, et al. Pyrotinib in patients with HER2-Amplified Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a prospective, Multicenter, single-arm trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(3):461–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shomer NH, Allen-Worthington KH, Hickman DL, Jonnalagadda M, Newsome JT, Slate AR, Valentine H, Williams AM, Wilkinson M. Review of Rodent Euthanasia methods. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2020;59(3):242–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Takeshita S, Kakita H, Nakamura N, Mori M, Toriuchi K, Aoki H, Inoue Y, Hayashi H, Yamada Y, Aoyama M. Thrombopoietin exerts a neuroprotective effect by inhibiting the suppression of neuronal proliferation and axonal outgrowth in intrauterine growth restriction rats. Exp Neurol 2024:114781.

  21. Wang J, Xia YC, Tian BX, Li JT, Li HY, Dong H, Li XG, Yu H, Zhu YY, Ma J, et al. Novel quantitative immunohistochemistry method using histone H3, family 3B as the internal reference standard for measuring human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer. Cancer. 2024;130(S8):1424–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang H, Nie C, Xu W, Li J, Gou H, Lv H, Chen B, Wang J, Liu Y, He Y, et al. In era of immunotherapy: the value of trastuzumab beyond progression in patients with trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Th Adv Gastroenterol. 2024;17:17562848241245455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao J, Wang X, Zhu H, Wei S, Zhang H, Ma L, Zhu W. Exploring natural killer cell-related biomarkers in multiple myeloma: a novel nature killer cell-related model predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response using single-cell study. Clin Exp Med. 2024;24(1):79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tseng YJ, Wang HY, Lin TW, Lu JJ, Hsieh CH, Liao CT. Development of a machine learning model for survival risk stratification of patients with advanced oral Cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2011768.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Khalil AA, Enezei HH, Aldelaimi TN, Mohammed KA. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma. J Craniofac Surg 2024.

  26. Tsuchihashi H, Naruse T, Yanamoto S, Okuyama K, Furukawa K, Omori K, Umeda M. Selective inhibition of PI3K110alpha as a novel therapeutic strategy for cetuximab–resistant oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2020;44(3):863–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Yin P, Cui S, Liao X, Yao X. Galectin–3 blockade suppresses the growth of cetuximab–resistant human oral squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Med Rep 2021, 24(4).

  28. Shah MP, Neal JW. Targeting acquired and intrinsic resistance mechanisms in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant non-small-cell Lung Cancer. Drugs. 2022;82(6):649–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Swain SM, Shastry M, Hamilton E. Targeting HER2-positive breast cancer: advances and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023;22(2):101–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Seiwert TY, Kochanny S, Wood K, Worden FP, Adkins D, Wade JL, Sleckman BG, Anderson D, Brisson RJ, Karrison T, et al. A randomized phase 2 study of temsirolimus and cetuximab versus temsirolimus alone in recurrent/metastatic, cetuximab-resistant head and neck cancer: the MAESTRO study. Cancer. 2020;126(14):3237–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang Z, Liao J, Schumaker L, Carter-Cooper B, Lapidus RG, Fan X, Gaykalova DA, Mehra R, Cullen KJ, Dan H. Simultaneously targeting ErbB family kinases and PI3K in HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2022;131:105939.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Warren EAK, Anil J, Castro PD, Kemnade J, Suzuki M, Hegde M, Hicks J, Yu W, Sandulache V, Sikora AG. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: variation within and across primary tumor sites, and implications for antigen-specific immunotherapy. Head Neck. 2021;43(7):1983–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Adnan Y, Ali SMA, Awan MS, Idress R, Awan MO, Farooqui HA, Kayani HA. Hormone receptors AR, ER, PR and growth factor receptor Her-2 expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma: correlation with overall survival, disease-free survival and 10-year survival in a high-risk population. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(5):e0267300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kamat M, Puranik RS, Rai BD, Patil BR, Varsha VK, Kamat S. Evaluation of Her-2 protein in histologically tumor-free margins of oral squamous cell carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study. J Cancer Res Ther. 2023;19(Supplement):S417–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, Allred DC, Bartlett JM, Bilous M, Fitzgibbons P, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(31):3997–4013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Starzynska A, Sobocki BK, Sakowicz-Burkiewicz M, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Alterio D, Szot O, Korwat A, Peksa R. VISTA H-Score is significantly Associated with a 5-Year DFS rate in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Med 2023, 12(4).

  37. Liu X, He Z, Qu Y, Meng Q, Qin L, Hu Y. Circulating natural autoantibodies to HER2-Derived peptides performed Antitumor effects on oral squamous cell carcinoma. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:693989.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Eljabo N, Nikolic N, Carkic J, Jelovac D, Lazarevic M, Tanic N, Milasin J. Genetic and epigenetic alterations in the tumour, tumour margins, and normal buccal mucosa of patients with oral cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47(8):976–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pennacchiotti G, Valdes-Gutierrez F, Gonzalez-Arriagada WA, Montes HF, Parra JMR, Guida VA, Gomez SE, Guerrero-Gimenez ME, Fernandez-Munoz JM, Zoppino FCM, et al. SPINK7 expression changes accompanied by HER2, P53 and RB1 can be relevant in predicting oral squamous cell carcinoma at a molecular level. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6939.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Song PN, Lynch SE, DeMellier CT, Mansur A, Gallegos CA, Wright BD, Hartman YE, Minton LE, Lapi SE, Warram JM, et al. Dual anti-HER2/EGFR inhibition synergistically increases therapeutic effects and alters tumor oxygenation in HNSCC. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):3771.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Yin W, Wang Y, Wu Z, Ye Y, Zhou L, Xu S, Lin Y, Du Y, Yan T, Yang F, et al. Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab and Pyrotinib for locally advanced HER2-Positive breast Cancer (NeoATP): primary analysis of a phase II study. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(17):3677–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Niu N, Qiu F, Xu Q, He G, Gu X, Guo W, Zhang D, Li Z, Zhao Y, Li Y, et al. A multicentre single arm phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant pyrotinib and letrozole plus dalpiciclib for triple-positive breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):7043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou C, Li X, Wang Q, Gao G, Zhang Y, Chen J, Shu Y, Hu Y, Fan Y, Fang J, et al. Pyrotinib in HER2-Mutant Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma after Platinum-based chemotherapy: a Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(24):2753–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen C, Winterstein AG, Lo-Ciganic WH, Tighe PJ, Wei YJ. Concurrent use of prescription gabapentinoids with opioids and risk for fall-related injury among older US Medicare beneficiaries with chronic noncancer pain: a population-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2022;19(3):e1003921.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Mangiapane LR, Nicotra A, Turdo A, Gaggianesi M, Bianca P, Di Franco S, Sardina DS, Veschi V, Signore M, Beyes S, et al. PI3K-driven HER2 expression is a potential therapeutic target in colorectal cancer stem cells. Gut. 2022;71(1):119–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhao TC, Zhou ZH, Ju WT, Liang SY, Tang X, Zhu DW, Zhang ZY, Zhong LP. Mechanism of sensitivity to cisplatin, docetaxel, and 5-fluorouracil chemoagents and potential erbB2 alternatives in oral cancer with growth differentiation factor 15 overexpression. Cancer Sci. 2022;113(2):478–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang C, Deng S, Chen J, Xu X, Hu X, Kong D, Liang G, Yuan X, Li Y, Wang X. The synergistic effects of Pyrotinib Combined with Adriamycin on HER2-Positive breast Cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:616443.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen H, Si Y, Wen J, Hu C, Xia E, Wang Y, Wang O. P110alpha inhibitor alpelisib exhibits a synergistic effect with pyrotinib and reverses pyrotinib resistant in HER2 + breast cancer. Neoplasia. 2023;43:100913.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the pathology department of Sir Runrun Shaw hospital for their support, and Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Company (CHN.) for providing the free PYR, and Professor Laiping Zhong (Shanghai Jiaotong University, school of medicine) for the free OSCC cell lines.

Funding

The present study was supported by the Open Fund of Zhejiang Stomatology Clinical research Center (2022-KFKT-05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Head and Neck Surgery, the Affiliated Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, PR China

    Liang Zhou & Kehao Le

  2. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, the Stomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No.166 Qiutao Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang, PR China

    Qianming Chen & Huiming Wang

Authors
  1. Liang Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kehao Le
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qianming Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huiming Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design: Liang Zhou, Qianming Chen, and Huiming Wang. Experiment and analysis: Liang Zhou, Kehao Le. Drafting the manuscript for important intellectual content: Liang Zhou. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript prior to submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huiming Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the ethics Committee of Sir Run Run Shaw hospital and written informed consent was obtained from all participants(keyan20210615-38, Figure S1). The experimental research on mice was approved by the Animal ethics Committee of Sir Run Run Shaw hospital else, and was complied with our hospital’s and ARRIVE guidelines(SRRSH202107123, Figure S2).

Consent for publication

Not application.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, L., Le, K., Chen, Q. et al. The efficacy and potential mechanisms of pyrotinib in targeting EGFR and HER2 in advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Oral Health 24, 898 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04459-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04459-4

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us