Skip to main content
Download PDF

A longitudinal pilot study examining the influence of the orthodontic system chosen in adult patients (brackets versus aligners) on oral health-related quality of life and anxiety

BMC Oral Health volume 24, Article number: 745 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In recent years, the demand for orthodontic treatment with aligners has increased, led by patient need, as aligners typically provide them with improved aesthetics and less physical discomfort. In deciding with the patient on an appropriate orthodontic system, it is important to take into account the potential discomfort and the perceptions that patients have in relation to their treatment. The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of brackets or aligners on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and anxiety levels in a sample of adult patients during the first month of treatment.

Methods

The pilot study was carried out at the Dental Clinic of the University of Salamanca between November 2023 and February 2024. Eighty adult patients who initiated orthodontic treatment were selected and divided into two groups: the brackets group (Victory®; 3 M Unitek, California, USA) (n = 40) and the aligners group (Invisalign®; Align Technology, California, USA) (n = 40). OHRQoL was analyzed using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire, and anxiety was analyzed using the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The follow-up time was one month, with scores recorded at the beginning (T0) and one month after starting treatment (T1).

Results

The mean patient age was 33.70 (± 5.45) years old. The total sample (n = 80) consisted of 66.2% men and 33.8% women. In the brackets group, one month after starting treatment, the dimension with the highest impact was that of physical pain (5.62 ± 1.51). In the aligners group, where the dimension of psychological disability had the highest score (4.22 ± 1.02). In the brackets group the total OHIP score was higher at one month (T1) (33.98 ± 6.81) than at the start of treatment (T0) (21.80 ± 3.34); this greater impact on OHRQoL one month after starting treatment was not observed in the aligners group (T1 = 27.33 ± 6.83; T0 = 27.33 ± 6.22). The orthodontic system used did not influence participants’ anxiety (p > 0.05). Age and sex were not influential factors in either OHRQoL or anxiety.

Conclusions

The bracket system significantly influenced patients’ OHRQoL. In the sample studied, no influence of the orthodontic system (brackets versus aligners) on anxiety was observed.

Peer Review reports

Background

The demand for orthodontic treatments has increased because of the possibility of using aligners in treatment, principally due to patients’ aesthetic demands [1]. This improvement in aesthetics has produced a concomitant increase in patients’ oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) [2, 3].

Aligners were developed as an aesthetic orthodontic alternative to the use of fixed brackets [1, 4]. Aligners also facilitate significantly improved oral hygiene, less discomfort, and greater convenience for patients, compared to fixed brackets; therefore, they can reduce the adverse effects of orthodontic treatment compared to conventional fixed brackets [5, 6].

In recent years, there has been an increased interest in research on OHRQoL and the anxiety that patients may experience during their orthodontic treatment [7]. The presence of a malocclusion has been observed as negatively affecting OHRQoL, especially at the beginning of orthodontic treatment. Patients typically request orthodontic treatment to improve their dental aesthetics, oral functionality, and psychosocial well-being [8, 9].

The scientific literature has concluded that orthodontic treatment can improve or worsen patients’ OHRQoL depending on which phase of treatment the patient is in. The impact of orthodontic treatment on OHRQoL decreases as treatment progresses. Evaluating OHRQoL may be an effective means of analyzing the results of orthodontic treatment in patients [8, 10, 11].

The pain that patients describe during orthodontic treatment can be influenced by different factors, including psychological traits such as their innate response to stress [12,13,14]. Different studies have reported that the pain described by patients also varies depending on the orthodontic system used. Treatment with brackets usually produces more pain compared to treatment with aligners [15, 16]. The discomfort and pain described by patients during the early stages of orthodontic treatment, especially during the first month, have a negative influence on patients’ OHRQoL and on their anxiety when facing treatment. This impact can have a negative repercussion on patients’ compliance with indications and may even make them unwilling to continue orthodontic treatment [10, 11, 13].

There is limited scientific evidence that analyzes the impact of orthodontic treatment on OHRQoL and the anxiety that patients describe during the early stages of treatment. The impact of orthodontic treatment on OHRQoL and anxiety levels during the first month of orthodontic treatment needs to be analysed. This first month of orthodontic treatment has a negative influence on patients’ pain levels [2, 7, 8].

Therefore, the objective of this pilot study was to analyze the possible influence of the orthodontic system used (brackets compared to aligners) on OHRQoL and anxiety levels in adult patients during the first month of treatment. The experimental hypothesis of this study is that OHRQoL and anxiety levels differ between patients treated with brackets and aligners during the initial phase of orthodontic treatment.

Methods

Study design

This pilot study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Salamanca (study reference number: 1074). This study followed the ethical principles established by the Declaration of Helsinki for research with humans, and the STROBE guidelines for conducting observational studies [17].

The patients were informed of the examination procedures and were guaranteed confidentiality of their collected information. Before recruitment, signed consent was obtained from each participant.

Interventions

OHRQoL and anxiety were analyzed in a consecutive sample of 80 patients who began orthodontic treatment at the Dental Clinic of the University of Salamanca. This sample was divided into two study groups: the brackets group (n = 40) and the aligners group (n = 40). No patient dropped out of the study while it was ongoing.

The participants in the brackets group were bonded with 0.022-inch slots MBT prescription stainless steel brackets (Victory®; 3 M Unitek, California, USA) in both arches. In the first clinical appointment, the upper and lower brackets and the tubes of the first permanent molars were cemented. The archwire was 0.014-inch NiTi (Ormco, California, USA) at baseline. The type of engagement with the elastomeric ligature (Dentaurum GmbH & Co., KG, Ispringen, Germany) was identical for all of the patients.

In the group of patients with aligners, the Invisalign® system (Align Technology, California, USA) was used. Tooth movements were planned at the rate recommended using algorithms from the ClinCheck Pro program. In the first clinical appointment, the attachments were cemented and the aligners were delivered. The patients were instructed to change aligners every seven days.

Eligibility criteria for participants

The inclusion criteria were as follows: adult patients (> 18 years); patients with permanent dentition (except third molars); and a maximum Little’s irregularity index of 6 mm.

The exclusion criteria were as follows: patient history of previous orthodontic treatment; orthodontic treatment with extractions; patients with craniofacial anomalies; patients with untreated caries; patients with untreated gingival and/or periodontal pathology; patients with symptoms of or diagnosed temporomandibular joint pathology; patients receiving treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, anxiolytics, and/or antidepressants; and pregnant patients.

Outcome measures

The impact of orthodontic treatment on patients’ OHRQL was analyzed using the Spanish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire [18].

The OHIP-14 questionnaire consists of 14 items that analyze the following seven domains of OHRQL: functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, and disability. The responses to this questionnaire were scored using a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never, 1 = almost never, 2 = occasionally, 3 = quite often, and 4 = very often) [19].

Anxiety was assessed with the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The STAI is a self-reported inventory that encompasses two independent scales that measure state anxiety (STAI-S) (how one feels at a given time) and trait anxiety (STAI-T) (how one usually feels) [20]. The Inventory is a 40-item Likert scale that evaluates separate dimensions of anxiety as a state (items 1–20) and anxiety as a trait (items 21–40). A score greater than 40 points is an indicator of a high degree of anxiety [20, 21].

The OHIP-14 and STAI questionnaires were provided to all study participants and completed at baseline (T0) and one month after starting treatment (T1).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with the SPSS version 28 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Qualitative variables were analyzed with tables of frequencies, percentages, Student’s t-test, and the Chi-square test. We selected a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results

Baseline data

The sample analyzed consisted of 80 patients divided into two study groups: 40 participants (30 men, 10 women) with a mean age of 32.15 years (± 5.79) in the brackets group, and 40 participants (23 men, 17 women) with a mean age of 35.25 years (± 4.67) in the aligners group. The descriptive statistics of the characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Patient baseline characteristics
Full size table

Oral health-related quality of life analysis

We analyzed the significance of the changes in the OHRQoL variables between the first month of treatment (T1) and at the start (T0) in the study population (n = 80). In the total sample, an increase in the negative impact of orthodontic treatment on OHRQoL was observed one month after starting treatment (T1), compared to the beginning (T0). The differences between T1 and T0 in the variables of the OHIP-14 questionnaire were all statistically significant (p < 0.01). The dimension of physical pain (+ 1.38) showed the most significant variation compared to the dimension of psychological discomfort, which showed the least variation (+ 0.56) (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of OHRQoL between baseline and the follow-up period, for the total sample
Full size table

In the brackets group, statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) were observed in all dimensions and in the total OHIP-14 score, when comparing the scores after a month and at the beginning of treatment. In this group, in the first month of treatment, the brackets had a negative impact on patients’ OHRQoL. The dimension that had the most significant impact one month after starting treatment was that of physical pain, compared to the disability dimension that had the least impact (Table 3) (Fig. 1).

Table 3 Comparison of OHRQoL between baseline and the follow-up period, in the brackets group
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Evolution of OHRQoL in the brackets group during the first month of treatment

Full size image

In the aligners group, compared to the patients with brackets, no significant differences were observed in any of the dimensions or in the total OHIP-14 score one month after starting treatment. A slight worsening in OHRQoL was observed in these patients, but this was not clinically significant. One month after starting orthodontic treatment, the dimension with the most significant impact was psychological disability, compared to the dimensions of functional limitation and disability, which were the items with the least impact on OHRQoL (Table 4) (Fig. 2).

Table 4 Comparison of OHRQoL between baseline and the follow-up period, in the aligners group
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Evolution of OHRQoL in the aligners group during the first month of treatment

Full size image

Sex and age did not have a statistically significant influence on the impact of orthodontic treatment on OHRQoL in the sample analyzed.

Anxiety analysis

No significant influence of orthodontic treatment on anxiety levels was observed one month after starting treatment (T1). A slight decrease in anxiety was observed one month after starting treatment, but this was not clinically significant (Table 5).

Table 5 Comparison of anxiety between baseline and the follow-up period, for the total sample
Full size table

The scores on the STAI inventory were compared between the two study groups. At the beginning of treatment, in the anxiety-trait, a significant difference was observed between the two study groups; however, clinically, this small difference was not important (Table 6).

Table 6 Comparison of the changes in the STAI questionnaire’s variables between treatment groups
Full size table

There were no influences of patients’ sex and age on their levels of anxiety in this study.

Discussion

The scientific literature includes only a few publications on the anxiety and OHRQoL of patients treated with aligners [11, 22]. Therefore, this longitudinal pilot study aimed to analyze the impact of orthodontic treatment with aligners on OHRQoL and anxiety compared to the bracket system, during the first month of orthodontic treatment.

There were no statistically significant differences between the participants of the brackets group and the aligners group in terms of their sex; additionally, whilst significant differences in age were observed between the groups, they were not clinically important. Therefore, the two study groups were considered homogeneous in terms of their sociodemographic characteristics and the severity of their malocclusion.

In this study, the OHIP-14 questionnaire was used to analyze the OHRQoL. This instrument is considered a valid tool for evaluating OHRQoL in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment [22,23,24,25,26].

To analyze the impact of orthodontic treatment with brackets or aligners on anxiety, we used the STAI inventory. This tool has also been used in previous studies in orthodontics [12, 13, 27, 28].

Orthodontic treatment can significantly improve patients’ OHRQoL [19, 23, 24, 29]. In this study, in the total sample, it was observed that at one month after starting treatment, the patients’ OHRQoL was worse than at the beginning. However, in the aligners group, in the dimensions of functional limitation, psychological discomfort, social disability, and disability measured with the OHIP-14 questionnaire, a trend appeared in which one month after starting treatment with aligners, the patients showed a lower degree of impact on all of these dimensions compared to the start of treatment, but without statistically significant differences. One month after starting treatment, the brackets group described a higher total score on the OHIP-14 questionnaire (33.98 ± 6.81) than the aligners group (27.33 ± 6.83). These results can be related to the fact that, during their treatment with aligners, patients were able to remove the aligners during meals. In the group of patients with brackets, one month after starting treatment (T1), the dimension of the OHIP-14 questionnaire with the highest score was that of physical pain (5.62 ± 1.51). This fact can be explained due to the discomfort that brackets can cause in patients (for example, the appearance of oral wounds). These results coincide with those reported by other authors [22, 29, 30].

Previous studies have also analyzed the impact of orthodontic treatment on OHRQoL, comparing patients being treated with brackets and patients being treated with aligners. These studies observed, as in this case, that treatment with aligners produced a lower impact on OHRQoL of adult patients compared to the bracket system, one month after starting treatment (brackets = 33.98 ± 6.81; aligners = 27.33 ± 6.83). Alfawal et al. [24] recorded that patients with aligners described a lower total score measured with the OHIP-14 questionnaire (14.14 ± 3.66) compared to patients with brackets (25.18 ± 4.15) one month after starting treatment. Similarly, results were obtained in the study of Jaber et al. [31], where one month after starting treatment, the group of patients with aligners described a lower total score on the OHIP-14 (5.82 ± 3.96) compared to patients with brackets (14.12 ± 9.07).

There are very few previous studies that have evaluated the possible influence of the orthodontic system used (brackets versus aligners) on anxiety levels. Gao M et al. [22] evaluated the influence of the orthodontic system (brackets compared to aligners) on the anxiety-state levels of the STAI inventory. They concluded that therapy with aligners produced lower levels of anxiety in patients compared to the use of brackets (p < 0.05) from the start of treatment to the end of the 14th day [22]. In our study, anxiety-trait levels with significant differences were only observed at baseline (T0). One month after starting treatment (T1), no statistically significant differences were observed between the two treatment systems.

In the present study, it was observed that anxiety levels were lower one month after starting treatment compared to the beginning, in both study groups. These results are in agreement with those reported by other authors, such as Wang et al. [13], who analyzed anxiety levels in patients who started orthodontic treatment with brackets and also concluded that anxiety levels were lower at one month (STAI = 31.0) compared to the start of treatment (STAI = 38.0); however, these authors did not observe a substantial decrease in anxiety levels between the first month and the start, as in our study.

Sex has been reported to be an influential factor on anxiety in the general population [32]. In this study, we observed that sex and age did not influence OHRQoL or anxiety levels. These results are similar to those reported in previous studies [33,34,35].

The results described in this study can provide information for orthodontists to provide to patients before starting their orthodontic treatment. Providing this information can increase patient cooperation and understanding during their orthodontic treatment. Knowing in advance the discomfort of orthodontic treatment can help professionals psychologically prepare the patient before starting their treatment.

Limitations

One of the limitations of this study is that the follow-up period was only one month, since the objective of this work was to analyze only the initial phases of orthodontic treatment. Another limitation of this study was that the type of malocclusion of the patients participating in the study was not taken into account. The degree of severity of malocclusion may influence patients’ OHRQoL and anxiety levels.

Randomized clinical studies are necessary, with a follow-up period appropriate to the duration of orthodontic treatment, to validate the effects of treatment with brackets and aligners on OHRQoL and anxiety levels. Analysing participants from different demographic groups can provide interesting practical information. It would be interesting to carry out multicenter research to analyze the different factors that may influence anxiety and OHRQoL, as well as to analyze the effects of the use of analgesic drugs during treatment on OHRQoL and anxiety.

Conclusions

  • Bracket treatment had a negative influence on patients’ OHRQoL one month after starting treatment.

  • The use of aligners did not influence OHRQoL one month after starting treatment.

  • The orthodontic system used did not influence anxiety levels during the first month of treatment.

  • In the sample analyzed, neither sex nor age influenced OHRQoL or anxiety described by patients.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

NS:

Not significant

OHRQoL:

Oral-health-related quality of life

SD:

Standard deviation

STAI:

State trait anxiety inventory

STROBE:

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology

References

  1. Papadimitriou A, Mousoulea S, Gkantidis N, Kloukos D. Clinical effectiveness of Invisalign® orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Prog Orthod. 2018;19:37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kara-Boulad JM, Burhan AS, Hajeer MY, Khattab TZ, Nawaya FR. Evaluation of the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients undergoing lingual versus labial fixed orthodontic appliances: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Cureus. 2022;14:e23379.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wedrychowska-Szulc B, Syryńska M. Patient and parent motivation for orthodontic treatment–a questionnaire study. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:447–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Robertson L, Kaur H, Fagundes NCF, Romanyk D, Major P, Mir CF. Effectiveness of clear aligner therapy for orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020;23:133–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Noll D, Mahon B, Shroff B, Carrico C, Lindauer SJ. Twitter analysis of the orthodontic patient experience with braces vs Invisalign. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:377–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Azaripour A, Weusmann J, Mahmoodi B, Peppas D, Gerhold-Ay A, Van Noorden CJ, et al. Braces versus Invisalign®: gingival parameters and patients’ satisfaction during treatment: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Büyükbayraktar ZÇ, Doruk C. Dental anxiety and fear levels, patient satisfaction, and quality of life in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: is there a relationship? Turk J Orthod. 2021;34:234–41.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Da Silva SP, Pitchika V, Baumert U, Wehrbein H, Schwestka-Polly R, Drescher D, et al. Oral health-related quality of life in orthodontics: a cross-sectional multicentre study on patients in orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42:270–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheerman JFM, Van Meijel B, Van Empelen P, Kramer GJC, Verrips GHW, Pakpour AH, et al. Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial to test the effect of a smartphone application on oral-health behavior and oral hygiene in adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18:19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen M, Wang DW, Wu LP. Fixed orthodontic appliance therapy and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in Chinese patients. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:49–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang M, McGrath C, Hägg U. Changes in oral health-related quality of life during fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;133:25–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cioffi I, Michelotti A, Perrotta S, Chiodini P, Ohrbach R. Effect of somatosensory amplification and trait anxiety on experimentally induced orthodontic pain. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124:127–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang J, Tang X, Shen Y, Shang G, Fang L, Wang R, et al. The correlations between health-related quality of life changes and pain and anxiety in orthodontic patients in the initial stage of treatment. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:725913.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Beck VJ, Farella M, Chandler NP, Kieser JA, Thomson WM. Factors associated with pain induced by orthodontic separators. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41:282–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yassir YA, Nabbat SA, McIntyre GT, Bearn DR. Clinical effectiveness of clear aligner treatment compared to fixed appliance treatment: an overview of systematic reviews. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26:2353–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shalish M, Cooper-Kazaz R, Ivgi I, Canetti L, Tsur B, Bachar E, et al. Adult patients’ adjustability to orthodontic appliances. Part I: a comparison between labial, lingual, and Invisalign™. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:724–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vandenbroucke JP, Von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Montero-Martín J, Bravo-Pérez M, Albaladejo-Martínez A, Hernández-Martín LA, Rosel-Gallardo EM. Validation the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14sp) for adults in Spain. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:E44–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Andiappan M, Gao W, Bernabé E, Kandala NB, Donaldson AN. Malocclusion, orthodontic treatment, and the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14): systematic review and meta-analysis. Angle Orthod. 2015;85:493–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Perpiñá-Galvañ J, Richart-Martínez M, Cabañero-Martínez MJ, Martínez-Durá I. Content validity of the short version of the subscale of the state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI). Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011;19:882–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Martí-Hereu L, Navarra-Ventura G, Navas-Pérez AM, Férnandez-Gonzalo S, Pérez-López F, De Haro-López C, et al. Usage of immersive virtual reality as a relaxation method in an intensive care unit. Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfie.2023.08.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gao M, Yan X, Zhao R, Shan Y, Chen Y, Jian F, et al. Comparison of pain perception, anxiety, and impacts on oral health-related quality of life between patients receiving clear aligners and fixed appliances during the initial stage of orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2021;43:353–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barrera-Chaparro JP, Plaza-Ruíz SP, Parra KL, Quintero M, Velasco MDP, Molinares MC, et al. Orthodontic treatment need, the types of brackets and the oral health-related quality of life. Dent Med Probl. 2023;60:287–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alfawal AMH, Burhan AS, Mahmoud G, Ajaj MA, Nawaya FR, Hanafi I. The impact of non-extraction orthodontic treatment on oral health-related quality of life: clear aligners versus fixed appliances-a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2022;44:595–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zamora-Martínez N, Paredes-Gallardo V, García-Sanz V, Gandía-Franco JL, Tarazona-Álvarez B. Comparative study of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQL) between different types of orthodontic treatment. Med (Kaunas). 2021;57:683.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Curto A, Albaladejo A, Montero J, Alvarado A. Influence of a lubricating gel (Orthospeed®) on pain and oral health-related quality of life in orthodontic patients during initial therapy with conventional and low-friction brackets: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Clin Med. 2020;9:1474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tran J, Lou T, Nebiolo B, Castroflorio T, Tassi A, Cioffi I. Impact of clear aligner therapy on tooth pain and masticatory muscle soreness. J Oral Rehabil. 2020;47:1521–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Aksoy A, Cesur MG, Dağdeviren BH, Özkaynak YA, Karacin G, Gültekin F. Assessment of pain, anxiety, and cortisol levels during the initial aligning phase of fixed orthodontic treatment. Turk J Orthod. 2019;32:34–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang B, Huang X, Huo S, Zhang C, Zhao S, Cen X, et al. Effect of clear aligners on oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020;23:363–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Flores-Mir C, Brandelli J, Pacheco-Pereira C. Patient satisfaction and quality of life status after 2 treatment modalities: invisalign and conventional fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2018;154:639–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jaber ST, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Latifeh Y. The effect of treatment with clear aligners versus fixed appliances on oral health-related quality of life in patients with severe crowding: a one-year follow-up randomized controlled clinical trial. Cureus. 2022;14:e25472.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Farhane-Medina NZ, Luque B, Tabernero C, Castillo-Mayén R. Factors associated with gender and sex differences in anxiety prevalence and comorbidity: a systematic review. Sci Prog. 2022;105:368504221135469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Curto A, Alvarado-Lorenzo A, Albaladejo A, Alvarado-Lorenzo A. Oral-health-related quality of life and anxiety in orthodontic patients with conventional brackets. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:10767.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Scariot R, Tomaz CO, Calixto RD, Gerber JT, Petinati MFP, Cavalcante RC, et al. Association between gender, estrogen receptors genes and anxiety levels in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019;47:1300–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Scott P, Sherriff M, Dibiase AT, Cobourne MT. Perception of discomfort during initial orthodontic tooth alignment using a self-ligating or conventional bracket system: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:227–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the participation of all the patients.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

    Laura Correa, Alberto Albaladejo & Adrián Curto

Authors
  1. Laura Correa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alberto Albaladejo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adrián Curto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C., A.A., and A.C.; methodology, L.C. and A.C.; formal analysis, L.C. and A.C.; investigation, L.C., A.A., and A.C.; data curation, A.A. and A.C.; writing—review and editing, L.C., A.A., and A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrián Curto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by The Research Ethics Committee of the University of Salamanca (protocol code 1074 and date or approval 10/25/2023).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Correa, L., Albaladejo, A. & Curto, A. A longitudinal pilot study examining the influence of the orthodontic system chosen in adult patients (brackets versus aligners) on oral health-related quality of life and anxiety. BMC Oral Health 24, 745 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04464-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04464-7

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us