Skip to main content
Download PDF

Investigation of adhesion status of Candida species to the surface of resin materials produced at different angles with additive manufacturing

BMC Oral Health volume 24, Article number: 738 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the adhesion of Candida glabrata, Candida albicans, Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis yeasts to disk-shaped resin materials produced from resin which used in the production of surgical guide with 0, 45 and 90-degrees printing orientations by Liquid Crystal Display additive manufacturing technology.

Methods

Disk-shaped specimens were printed with surgical guide resin using the Liquid Crystal Display production technique in 3 printing orientations (0, 45 and 90-degrees). Surface roughness and contact angle values were evaluated. Real-Time PCR analysis was performed to evaluate Candida adhesion (C. glabrata, C. albicans, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis) Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) images of the materials were obtained.

Results

Specimens oriented at 45-degrees demonstrated higher surface roughness (P < .05) and lower contact angle values than other groups. No significant difference was found in the adhesion of C. glabrata, C. albicans, and C. parapsilosis among specimens printed at 0, 45, and 90-degrees orientations (P > .05). A higher proportion of C. krusei and C. tropicalis was found in the specimens printed at orientation degrees of 45 = 90 < 0 with statistical significance. Analyzing the adhesion of all Candida species reveals no statistical disparity among the printing orientations.

Conclusions

The surface roughness, contact angle, and adhesion of certain Candida species are affected by printing orientations. Hence, careful consideration of the printing orientation is crucial for fabricating products with desirable properties. In 45-degree production, roughness increases due to the layered production forming steps, whereas in 0-degree production, certain Candida species exhibit high adhesion due to the formation of porous structures. Consequently, considering these factors, it is advisable to opt for production at 90-degrees, while also considering other anticipated characteristics.

Peer Review reports

Background

Treatment predictability is increased by digitally positioning implants before surgery. In this context, surgical guides produced by additive manufacturing (AM) are frequently used in implant placement today [1, 2]. In AM, the printing orientation plays a pivotal role in determining the direction of layering and the configuration of layers, thereby shaping the geometry of the surface. Given that surface geometry significantly influences surface properties, the choice of printing orientation for denture bases holds substantial importance in shaping the surface properties of three-dimensional (3D) printed dentures. Key material properties impacted by the printing orientation include surface properties, color stability, cleanability of the denture base, and adhesion of microorganisms [3]. However, there are few studies regarding the relationship between surface properties that change with the printing orientation and the adhesion properties of microorganisms in the literature [4, 5].

It has been recognized that Candida is implicated in the development of lesions such as candidiasis and angular cheilitis [6]. Moreover, it is closely associated with premalignant and malignant oral lesions [7]. Notably, leukoplakia lesions infected with Candida present a heightened risk of malignancy [8]. Candida infections have been identified to play a contributory role in the development of oral epithelial dysplasia and neoplasia. An association has been observed between oral epithelial dysplasia and members of the genus Candida present in the oral cavity, with species such as C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei being commonly encountered [9,10,11]. While Candida species are generally recognized as opportunistic pathogens capable of causing various oral infections [12], the precise relationship between Candida infections and oral cancer remains uncertain [13]. Further research is needed to elucidate whether Candida infections directly contribute to the development of oral cancer.

Conventional methods for identifying microorganisms, such as cultivation on agar plates, have long been used. However, there is an urgent need for rapid and reliable methods to identify microorganisms in routine clinical diagnostics. To meet this need, various chromogenic media and biochemical reaction-based test kits are currently used. However, clinical specimens (saliva, biopsy, dental plaque) may contain microorganisms belonging to different subspecies or clades, posing challenges in obtaining definitive results for timely decision-making. Molecular biology methods offer greater accuracy in such scenarios. In particular, Real-Time PCR is a frequently preferred, rapid, and reliable method widely used to identify microorganisms [14, 15]. Additionally, studies which the Real-Time PCR technique has been utilized have described the advantages of using Real-Time PCR analysis over conventional methods for evaluating the adhesion of Candida species [16, 17].

The aim of this study was to investigate the adhesion of Candida species (C. glabrata, C. albicans, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis) to disk-shaped samples designed and fabricated with three different printing orientations (0, 45, and 90-degrees) using the AM method. The null hypotheses of the study were:

H01 Hypothesis: Printing orientation does not affect Candida species adhesion.

H02 Hypothesis: There is no difference among Candida species when their adhesion to samples obtained by AM is evaluated.

Methods

Sample preparation

The disk-shaped resin samples were fabricated using the Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) 3D printing method (Ackuretta FreeShape 120, Ackuretta Technologies, Taipei, Taiwan) using resin commonly used in the production of surgical guide (MACK4D guide 405 clear/transparent Model Resin; MACK4D GmbH, Neukieritzsch, Germany). Disk-shaped materials with a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 2 mm, were designed according to the ISO 10993-12:2021 standard [4]. The design of the materials was created using 3D computer-aided design software (Blender v.3.5.0; Blender Foundation, Amsterdam, Netherlands), with printing orientations set at 0, 45, and 90-degrees and fabricated with at a layer thickness resolution of 100 μm. The fabricated materials were cleaned with isopropyl alcohol (%99,9 purity) for 5 min using an ultrasonic cleaning device (CLEANI, Ackuretta Technologies, Taipei, Taiwan), according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The polymerization was then completed using a UV irradiator emitting light at a wavelength of 405 nm (UV CURIE; Ackuretta Technologies, Taipei, Taiwan), and the process lasted for 3 min.

Surface roughness measurement

Surface roughness measurements of the prepared materials were performed using a profilometer device (Surftest SJ-210, Mitutoyo Corp., Kanagawa, Japan). The average surface roughness value (Ra) was determined by measuring (µm) three regions identified at the center of the sample surface. Measurements were made at a speed of 0.5 mm/sec, with a cut-off measurement length of λc = 0.25 [18].

Pilot study and sample size determination

A pilot study was conducted prior to the study to determine the appropriate sample size. Adhesion data (CFU/material) obtained from the pilot study were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance using SPSS/PC Version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The mean and the common standard deviation values of the obtained data were calculated to determine the effect size for five yeast species using the G-Power program, version 3.1.9.4 (Düsseldorf, Germany). The calculated effect sizes were 3.532, 0.546, 7.053, 5.43, and 1.246 for C. glabrata, C. albicans, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis respectively. The analysis was then continued using the lowest effect size value. Consequently, the sample size was determined to be 36 disk-shaped resin samples, with 12 samples in each group produced from each production angle, ensuring a power of 0.80 and a significance level of 0.05.

Preparation of the solutions

Fusayama-Meyer artificial saliva (KCl: 0.4; NaCl: 0.4; CaCl2.2H2O: 0.906; NaH2PO4.2H2O: 0.690; Na2S.9H2O: 0.005; CH4N2O: 1 (g/L)), Yeast Extract Peptone (YEP) (peptone: 20; dextrose: 20; yeast extract: 10 (g/L)), and PBS solution (Na2HPO4: 1.44; KCl: 0.2; KH2PO4: 0.245; NaCl: 8 (g/L), pH 7.2) were prepared for use in Candida cell attachment studies. CHROMAgarTM Candida (CHROMagar Microbiology, Paris, France) medium was purchased from a supplier. 12 samples from each material group, produced with a 3D printer at 0, 45, and 90-degrees printing orientation, were placed in 30 mL clean glass vials. PBS solution, culture media, and glass vials were autoclaved at 121 °C for 15 min.

Microbial adhesion test

C. albicans ATCC 64548, C. krusei ATCC 6258, C. tropicalis RSSK 665, C. glabrata (clinical isolate), and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were inoculated onto sterile YEP agar using the streak plate method. The inoculated plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24–36 h. After the incubation period, the purity of the cultured cells was assessed. Each Candida species was then aseptically transferred to 5 ml YEP broth tubes and incubated at 37 °C for a further 24–36 h to facilitate growth in liquid culture.

After the incubation period, 1 mL of each Candida species was transferred to 1.5 mL sterile microcentrifuge tubes and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 minutes. After centrifugation, the supernatants were discarded, then the cell pellets were mixed with 1 mL of PBS, and the tubes were vortexed until the cells were suspended. The cell suspensions were adjusted to 0.5 (approximately 1.5 × 105 CFU/mL) optical density (OD) at 540 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. A final volume of approximately 103 CFU/mL of a Candida mixture was inoculated into each material group. The samples were then incubated in a shaking incubator at 150 rpm and 37 °C for 2 h. After incubation, materials were removed from the bottles with sterile forceps and gently immersed three times in sterile PBS to wash out the unattached cells. Candida cells that did not adhere to the materials were removed in this manner. Any excess fluid remaining on the material was gently absorbed with a clean napkin. Each material was placed in microcentrifuge tubes containing 1 mL of PBS and the tubes were vortexed at full speed for two minutes to detach the cells.

Detection and enumeration of adhered Candida cells were analyzed using a Real-Time PCR device (LightCycler® 96 System, Roche Diagnostics, Germany). For this purpose, fungal genomic DNA was extracted from adherent cell solutions obtained from each sample in the vortexing step. The amount and purity of the extracted DNA samples were determined by measuring the absorbance at 260/280 nm using a microvolume spectrophotometer (Nanodrop 2000c, Thermo Scientific, USA). The FastStart Essential DNA Green Master Kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany) was used to quantify the extracted DNA samples by Real-Time PCR [19]. The species-specific PCR primer sets were used to quantify each of the five Candida species in Real-Time PCR experiments (Table 1).

Table 1 Primer sets utilized for the quantitative assessment of Candida species via Real-Time PCR
Full size table

Real-Time PCR protocols were performed as follows: For C. albicans and C. krusei, an initial pre-incubation step at 95 °C for 10 min was followed by an amplification step consisting of 45 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s, 54 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 12 s. For C. glabrata, the PCR protocol included a pre-incubation step at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by amplification steps of 45 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s, 53 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 6 s. Similarly, for C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis, the pre-incubation step was performed at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by amplification steps of 45 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s, 57 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 6 s. A melting step was then performed at 95 °C for 10 s, followed by a step at 65 °C for 60 s, and finally at 97 °C for 1 s. The procedure was completed with a cooling step at 37 °C for 30 s. The Candida cells adhering to the materials were calculated as copy DNA/material according to the standard curves previously established for each species.

FESEM analysis

For surface topography analysis, three samples were selected from each working group, with one material subjected to vortexing and one left unvortexed. The selected samples were coated with an 80 − 20% gold-palladium mixture under an appropriate vacuum using a gold coating apparatus (Quorum Q150R ES, Quorum Technologies Ltd., East Grinstead, United Kingdom) for 15 min. The samples were then analyzed in a FESEM instrument (Zeiss SUPRA 40 VP, USA) [20]. The surface topography of the materials was examined along with the assessment of surface attachment of Candida cells.

Contact angle measurement

The sessile drop method was employed to measure the contact angle using a goniometer device (phx300, SEO, Busan, Republic of Korea). The image of the water (4 µL) dropped onto the material was automatically measured (mean = 10) [21].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using an SPSS statistical program (SPSS/PC Version 25; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were calculated for surface roughness and Real-Time PCR results, including mean, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum values. Normally distributed data were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the Bonferroni test was used for pairwise comparisons. Welch ANOVA and post-hoc Tamhane tests were used to analyze data that did not show homogeneity of variance. All tests were performed at a significance level of 0.05. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine whether the surface roughness data of the materials were normally distributed, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with Lilliefors correction was used to determine whether the data obtained from the Real-Time PCR analyses were normally distributed. Levene’s test was used to determine homogeneity of variances.

Results

The descriptive statistics and comparison of the surface roughness values are presented in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2 Surface roughness values (Ra, µm) described through descriptive statistics
Full size table
Table 3 Surface roughness values (Ra, µm) described through descriptive statistics
Full size table

Comparison of surface roughness values was evaluated by Welch ANOVA (FWelch(2,19,512) = 28,162, P < .05) followed by a post-hoc Tamhane test.

The descriptive statistics for the Real-Time PCR data are presented in Table 4 and the graph derived from Real Time PCR findings is given in Fig. 1.

Table 4 Statistical analysis summarizing Real-Time PCR results
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Column graph derived from Real-Time PCR findings

Full size image

The amount of Candida species adhering to materials fabricated at a 0-degree printing orientation was evaluated using Welch ANOVA (FWelch (4,28,136) = 22,118, P < .05), followed by a post-hoc Tamhane test for further analysis. The results are shown in Table 5.

Table 5 The adhesion quantity of Candida species on materials fabricated with a 0-degree printing orientation (Tamhane test)
Full size table

The result of Tamhane test showed a statistically significant difference between the adhesion amounts of C. parapsilosis and the other Candida species (P < .05), while no statistically significant difference was observed between C. glabrata and C. albicans (P = 1.000) and between C. krusei and C. tropicalis (P = .829).

The amount of Candida species adhering to materials produced at a 45-degree printing orientation was evaluated using Welch ANOVA (FWelch (4,27,167) = 58,528, P < .05) followed by a post hoc Tamhane test for further analysis. The results are presented in Table 6.

Table 6 The adhesion quantity of Candida species on materials fabricated with a 45-degree printing orientation (Tamhane test)
Full size table

According to Tamhane test result; statistically significant differences were found among the Candida species (P < .05), except for C. albicans and C. glabrata (P = .802), which showed no significant difference.

The amount of Candida species adhering to materials produced at a 90-degree printing orientation was evaluated using ANOVA (F(4,59) = 41,131, P < .05), followed by a post hoc Tamhane test for further analysis. The results are presented in Table 7.

Table 7 The adhesion quantity of Candida species on materials fabricated with a 90-degree printing orientation (Tamhane test)
Full size table

According to Tamhane test result; statistically significant differences were found among the Candida species (P < .05), except for C. albicans and C. glabrata (P = 1.000), which showed no significant difference.

Based on the ANOVA test results, no statistically significant differences were observed in the adhesion of C. glabrata (F(2,23) = 0.828, P > .05), C. albicans (F (2,35) = 0.304, P > .05), C. parapsilosis (F(2,35) = 0.194, P > .05) to the materials made at different printing orientations. However, there is a statistically significant difference between the adhesion of C. krusei (F(2,35) = 5.802, P < .05) and C. tropicalis (F(2,35) = 8.430, P < .05) to materials produced at different angles. The Bonferroni test was used for pairwise comparisons. The Bonferroni test results for C. krusei are shown in Table 8, while those for C. tropicalis are shown in Table 9.

Table 8 Graph showing the amount of adhering C. Krusei (Bonferroni test)
Full size table
Table 9 Graph showing the amount of adhering C. Tropicalis (Bonferroni test)
Full size table

When considering the adhesion of C. krusei and C. tropicalis, there is a statistically significant difference between materials produced at 0-degrees of printing orientation compared to those produced at 45 and 90-degrees of printing orientation (P < .05). However, there is no statistically significant difference between materials produced at 45 and 90-degrees printing orientation (P > .05).

In this study, C. parapsilosis exhibited the greatest ability to adhere to surfaces across all tested printing orientations, as evidenced by the statistically significant higher adhesion values compared to other Candida species (P < .05). Specifically, C. parapsilosis showed significantly higher adhesion compared to C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis (Tables 4, 5 and 6).

Descriptive statistics of the determination of the amount of Candida species adhesion to the materials by Real-Time PCR are given in Table 10; Fig. 2.

Table 10 Descriptive statistics for the amount of Candida species adhering to materials fabricated at different angles
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Total amount of Candida adhering to materials fabricated at different printing orientations

Full size image

According to the ANOVA test result, there is no statistically significant difference between the materials fabricated at different angles in terms of total Candida adherence according to Real-Time PCR analysis (F(2,23) = 1,000, P > .05).

The degree of adhesion of Candida strains was significantly affected by the surface roughness of the materials. Specifically, materials fabricated at a 45-degree printing orientation, which exhibited the highest surface roughness values (mean Ra = 3.4201 ± 1.3014 μm), showed significantly higher adhesion of Candida species compared to those fabricated at 0-degree and 90-degree orientations (Tables 2 and 3). The enhanced adhesion on rougher surfaces can be attributed to the increased surface area and potential for mechanical interlocking.

Contact angle images are shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Contact angle images at different printing orientations (a) at 0-degree (b) at 45-degree (c) at 90-degree

Full size image

It was found that the average contact angle value of the materials fabricated at a 45-degree printing orientation (111.16) was lower compared to those fabricated at 0 (116.79) and 90-degrees printing orientation (119.29).

One sample each from the control group, the vortexed material, and the vortexed material after adhesion were examined by FESEM at 200X and 2000X magnification. The FESEM images are shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

FESEM images of the material fabricated at 0, 45 and 90-degree orientation. (a) Control group at 200X (b) Vortexed material at 2000X (c) Vortexed material after adhesion at 2000X

Full size image

In the FESEM image of the 0-degree printing orientation material, horizontal surface lines resulting from the manufacturing angle can be seen. Both horizontal and vertical surface cracks were detected and are believed to be due to the manufacturing process. Although less yeast adhesion is observed in the vortexed samples compared to the non-vortexed samples in all groups, this result is expected.

In the FESEM image of the material with a 45-degree printing orientation, rectangular patterns formed by horizontal and vertical surface lines resulting from the printing orientation are visible. Deep cracks and defects can be seen in the non-treated sample. This may be due to the stepped manufacturing process associated with the 45-degree printing orientation.

In the FESEM image of the material with a 90-degree compression orientation, diagonal lines from the compression orientation are visible. Deep cracks and defects can be seen in the non-treated sample. This may be due to the stepped production process associated with the 45-degree printing orientation. Pores and rough areas on the surface were observed in the vortexed samples. This observation may be related to residual monomers that sometimes appear on the surface of 3D printed materials that have undergone post-processing. Although less yeast adhesion is observed in the vortexed samples compared to the non-vortexed samples, this result isexpected.

Discussion

In this study, the adhesion of five different Candida species was investigated on disk-shaped materials produced by AM at three different printing angles. Statistically, the printing orientation has no effect on the adhesion of Candida species. However, there is a difference in the amount of adhesion between certain Candida species.

3D printing methods have been studied by numerous researchers [4, 24,25,26]. Andjela et al. [25] found that while SLA and DLP fabrication techniques are frequently investigated in research, there is a lack of studies on LCD fabrication techniques. In addition, while bar-shaped samples have been used for mechanical testing, disk-shaped samples have been used for microbial adhesion studies [4, 13, 20, 27,28,29,30,31]. Disk-shaped samples were fabricated according to ISO 10993-12:2021 standard with a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 2 mm at 0, 45, and 90-degree printing orientations, which is consistent with previous studies [24, 28, 31, 32].

Researchers [33,34,35] have demonstrated that Candida colonizes plastic surfaces. In this study, the resin material used in the manufacture of surgical guides, which aid in the precise placement of dental implants in their optimal positions, was used in procedures such as auto-transplantation, guided osteotomy, and root resection [23, 36].

Various results have been reported regarding the effect of printing orientation of materials on microbial adhesion [4, 24]. Shim et al. [4], performed a comparison of roughness and C. albicans adhesion levels of the materials they fabricated at 0, 45, and 90-degrees of printing orientation and found that the average roughness values of the specimens fabricated at 45-degree of printing orientation were higher compared to those at 0 and 45-degrees of print orientation. These results are consistent with those reported in our study. Shim et al. [4] also indicated that samples fabricated at a 45-degree printing orientation were rougher due to the gradual addition of layers, resulting in stepped edge surfaces between layers and increased surface roughness. The observation that samples produced at 45-degrees printing orientation had higher roughness values in this study may be attributed to this circumstance. The FESEM images from this study also support this finding. In addition, they found that C. albicans exhibited greater adhesion to materials fabricated at a 0-degree printing orientation compared to those fabricated at 45 and 90-degrees. Shim et al. [4] attributed this to the pore structure of the 0-degree printing orientation materials. In addition, Singh et al. [37] stated in their study that the porous structure of the material acts as a reservoir for microorganisms. In our study, although materials fabricated with a production orientation of 45-degree have higher average roughness values than those fabricated with 0 and 90-degrees, there was a noticeable preference for C. krusei and C. tropicalis to adhere to materials fabricated with a 0-degree orientation rather than those fabricated with 45 and 90-degrees. The results could be attributed to the explanations proposed by Shim et al. [4] and Singh et al. [37].

Li et al. [22], concluded that the printing orientation (0, 45 and 90-degrees) had no effect on the adhesion of C. albicans to the 3D printed denture bases. The same result can be found in our study with respect to C. albicans, C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis.

In a previous study, researchers found that C. glabrata showed twice as much adhesion to denture acrylic surfaces as C. albicans [38]. Contrary to this finding, in our study, there is no statistical difference between the adhesion levels of C. glabrata and C. albicans on the samples produced at all printing orientations. In another study investigating Candida adhesion to the silicone surface using Real-Time PCR analysis, C. glabrata was found to have statistically higher adhesion compared to C. tropicalis [39]. While these results are consistent with our study results, it is noteworthy that C. glabrata showed greater adhesion than C. parapsilosis, which is in contrast to our study. C. parapsilosis showed statistically higher adhesion than C. glabrata to the materials produced in all printed orientations in our study. On the contrary, Silva-Dias et al. [40] found that C. parapsilosis showed greater adhesion than C. albicans, which is in agreement with our study.

Luo and Samaranayake [38] emphasized the critical importance of examining a wide range of isolates within a single species before drawing conclusions about interspecies differences in phenotypic characteristics. Considering all these results, the difference between our results and previous studies may be attributed to the simultaneous evaluation of cells belonging to five Candida species.

Thaweboon et al. [41], investigated the adhesion of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei to vanillin-incorporated PMMA resin for oral obturators. Statistically, C. albicans showed the highest amount of adhesion, followed by C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, and C. krusei, respectively. Although the results of the study are similar, the main difference is that there is no statistical difference between C. glabrata and C. albicans in our study.

He et al. [42], investigated the in vitro adhesion levels of C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. krusei to prosthetic acrylic resin. They found that C. glabrata exhibited the highest level of adhesion. In this study, C. glabrata showed higher adhesion compared to C. krusei, while there was no significant difference between C. glabrata and C. albicans.

Studies [39, 43,44,45,46], have shown that the higher adhesion of one species compared to another is highly dependent on the substrate used and growth conditions. In addition, it is believed that the variation in the amount of adhesion may be due to different affinities and different cell wall compositions of the species and methodological variations of the studies [40]. The results of this study should be evaluated in light of all these factors.

When examining the FESEM images, we observed horizontal surface lines resulting from the printing orientation on materials produced at 0-degree; small squares formed by both horizontal and vertical surface lines due to the printing orientation on materials produced at 45-degree; and oblique lines resulting from the printing orientation on materials produced at 90-degree.

Candida adhesion is affected by variations in the surface geometry of materials. To mitigate yeast species adhesion and ensure effective cleanability, it is imperative to prevent the formation of porous structures. Compared to a more vertical printing orientation, there is a higher probability of unreacted monomer remaining in samples produced at a 0-degree printing orientation. Candida species showed greater adhesion to samples fabricated at a 45-degree angle compared to those produced at a 90-degree angle which is not statistically significant. Materials produced at a 45-degree printing orientation exhibit more irregularities compared to those produced at a 90-degree printing orientation. It was observed that Candida species tended to colonize these irregularities. Surface free energy is one of the most important factors in determining yeast adhesion to the intraoral device [47]. The surface properties of the material obtained with a 45-degree printing orientation that favor the adhesion of microorganisms, including lower hydrophobicity and higher surface energy, are likely the underlying reasons for the increased amount of Candida present on the surface. It is defined as the interaction between cohesion and adhesion forces and determines the wettability of the surface [47]. A linear relationship has been demonstrated between contact angle measurements and Candida adhesion on various materials. Increased surface free energy corresponds to increased microbial. Alternatively, as the surface becomes less hydrophobic, the presence of adherent microorganisms tends to increase [48,49,50].

The ability of microorganisms to adhere to oral devices has been linked to the chemical composition of the material, surface properties, or both [51]. Although the relationship between surface hydrophobicity and Candida adhesion has been extensively studied in the literature, data on this topic remain controversial [52,53,54,55]. Cerca et al. [51], reported in their study, aimed at analyzing the adhesion of various clinical S. epidermidis isolates to different materials, that greater biofilm formation was observed on hydrophilic surfaces compared to hydrophobic surfaces. A positively charged surface promotes greater microbial adhesion compared to a negatively charged surface [56]. In additionally, rough surfaces create an environment in which microorganisms are protected from brushing, muscle movement, and salivary flow, factors that can influence microbial adhesion [57].

Rapid and accurate identification of Candida species in clinical specimens is important for initial of appropriate antifungal therapy and patient care. Traditional culture methods for identification of Candida species are time-consuming and results can sometimes be inconclusive [58]. Recent clinical reports using advanced diagnostic methods based on molecular tools have identified abundant non-C. albicans (NCA) Candida species in primary and recurrent infections [22, 58]. C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, and C. parapsilosis have been isolated from patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis, including those with removable dentures, HIV infection, diabetes, or other oral complications [59]. Many studies have used Real Time-PCR as a better alternative to conventional PCR [60,61,62,63,64,65].

Our findings demonstrate that C. parapsilosis has a significantly higher ability to adhere to surfaces compared to other Candida species. This is consistent with previous research indicating the robust adhesion properties of C. parapsilosis, particularly in medical and dental contexts [40]. Additionally, the impact of surface roughness on Candida adhesion was clearly evident, with rougher surfaces facilitating greater microbial adherence. This aligns with existing literature suggesting that increased surface roughness enhances microbial retention due to larger surface area and mechanical interlocking opportunities.

Conclusion

This study investigated the adhesion abilities of different Candida species to various surfaces. Our findings revealed that C. parapsilosis exhibited the greatest adhesion capability compared to other Candida species. Additionally, surface roughness significantly influenced the degree of Candida adhesion, with rougher surfaces showing higher adhesion rates. These results provide crucial insights for the design and material selection of dental and medical devices.

This study contributes valuable data to the microbiology community, particularly in understanding the adhesion mechanisms of Candida species. The findings can inform new strategies for preventing and controlling Candida infections. Moreover, a deeper understanding of the biofilm-forming potential of these species can lead to novel approaches in clinical practice for managing and treating infections. Future research should aim to validate these findings in clinical settings and explore the effects of surface modifications on infection control.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. De Santis D, Gelpi F, Zambotti T, Rossetto A, Luciano U, Zotti F, et al. The use of computer-guided flapless dental implant surgery (Nobel guide®) and immediate function to support a fixed full-arch prosthesis in fresh frozen homologous bone grafted patients: a retrospective cohort study with 5 to 8-year follow-up. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2020;34(6 Suppl 2):49–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nicchio N, Gonįalves V, Mendonįa G, e Pessoa RS, Frizzera F, Zandim-Barcelos DL. Accuracy of partially and fully guided surgical techniques for immediate implant placement: an in vitro assessment. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(2):363.e1–e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tymrak B, Kreiger M, Pearce JM. Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des. 2014;58:242–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shim JS, Kim J-E, Jeong SH, Choi YJ, Ryu JJ. Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(4):468–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shah KK, Sivaswamy V, Ahmed N, Ganapathy D. Printing accuracy and microbial adhesion of 3d printed denture resin with various printing orientations. J Clin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;27(2):264–73.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abrantes PM, Behardien K, Africa CW. Real-Time Assessment of interspecies Biofilm formation. Open Microbiol J. 2022;16(1).

  7. Bansal R, Pallagatti S, Sheikh S, Aggarwal A, Gupta D, Singh R. Candidal species identification in malignant and potentially malignant oral lesions with antifungal resistance patterns. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9(Suppl 2):S309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Reibel J. Prognosis of oral pre-malignant lesions: significance of clinical, histopathological, and molecular biological characteristics. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14(1):47–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Feagans WM, Glick M. Burket’s oral medicine: People’s medical publishing house; Shelton; 2015. pp. 173–201.

  10. Gerós-Mesquita Â, Carvalho-Pereira J, Franco-Duarte R, Alves A, Gerós H, Pais C, et al. Oral Candida albicans colonization in healthy individuals: prevalence, genotypic diversity, stability along time and transmissibility. J Oral Microbiol. 2020;12(1):1820292.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. McCullough M, Jaber M, Barrett A, Bain L, Speight P, Porter S. Oral yeast carriage correlates with presence of oral epithelial dysplasia. Oral Oncol. 2002;38(4):391–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Talapko J, Juzbašić M, Matijević T, Pustijanac E, Bekić S, Kotris I, et al. Candida albicans—the virulence factors and clinical manifestations of infection. J Fungi. 2021;7(2):79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meirowitz A, Rahmanov A, Shlomo E, Zelikman H, Dolev E, Sterer N. Effect of denture base fabrication technique on Candida albicans adhesion in vitro. Mater (Basel). 2021;14(1):221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ginzinger DG. Gene quantification using Real-Time quantitative PCR: an emerging technology hits the mainstream. Exp Hematol. 2002;30(6):503–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Metwally L, Fairley D, Coyle P, Hay R, Hedderwick S, McCloskey B, et al. Improving molecular detection of Candida DNA in whole blood: comparison of seven fungal DNA extraction protocols using Real-Time PCR. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57(3):296–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zarei N, Roudbary M, Roudbar M, dos Santos AL, Nikoomanesh F, Mohammadi R, et al. Prevalence, molecular identification, and genotyping of Candida species recovered from oral cavity among patients with diabetes mellitus from Tehran, Iran. Adv Biomed Res. 2022;11(1):29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tomov G, Stamenov N, Neychev D, Atliev K. Candida carriers among individuals with tongue piercing: a Real-Time PCR study. Antibiotics. 2022;11(6):742.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ribeiro AKC, de Freitas RFCP, de Carvalho IHG, de Miranda LM, da Silva NR, L de Fátima Dantas de Almeida, et al. Flexural strength, surface roughness, micro-CT analysis, and microbiological adhesion of a 3D-printed temporary crown material. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(5):2207–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. İlhan B, Vural C, Gürhan C, Vural C, Veral A, Wilder-Smith P, et al. Real-time PCR detection of Candida species in biopsy samples from non-smokers with oral dysplasia and oral squamous cell cancer: a retrospective archive study. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(21):5251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Silva JV, O’Mahony JA. Flowability and wetting behaviour of milk protein ingredients as influenced by powder composition, particle size and microstructure. Int J Dairy Technol. 2017;70(2):277–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang P, Chen X, Chen Z, Chen M, He J, Peng L. Efficacy of Er: YAG laser irradiation for decontamination and its effect on biocompatibility of different titanium surfaces. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):649.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Li P, Fernandez PK, Spintzyk S, Schmidt F, Beuer F, Unkovskiy A. Effect of additive manufacturing method and build angle on surface characteristics and Candida albicans adhesion to 3D printed denture base polymers. J Dent. 2022;116:103889.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miyanaji H, Yang L, Zhang S, Zandinejad A, editors. A preliminary study of the graded dental porcelain ceramic structures fabricated via binder jetting 3D printing. 2014 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium; 2014: University of Texas at Austin.

  24. Salmi M, Paloheimo K-S, Tuomi J, Wolff J, Mäkitie A. Accuracy of medical models made by additive manufacturing (rapid manufacturing). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41(7):603–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Andjela L, Abdurahmanovich VM, Vladimirovna SN, Mikhailovna GI, Yurievich DD, Alekseevna MY. A review on vat photopolymerization 3D-printing processes for dental application. Dent Mater. 2022.

  26. Di Fiore A, Meneghello R, Brun P, Rosso S, Gattazzo A, Stellini E, et al. Comparison of the flexural and surface properties of milled, 3D-printed, and heat polymerized PMMA resins for denture bases: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res. 2022;66(3):502–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee H-E, Alauddin MS, Mohd Ghazali MI, Said Z, Mohamad Zol S. Effect of different vat polymerization techniques on mechanical and biological properties of 3D-printed denture base. Polymers. 2023;15(6):1463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Li P, Fernandez PK, Spintzyk S, Schmidt F, Yassine J, Beuer F, et al. Effects of layer thickness and build angle on the microbial adhesion of denture base polymers manufactured by digital light processing. J Prosthodont Res. 2023;67(4):562–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Salgado H, Gomes AT, Duarte AS, Ferreira JM, Fernandes C, Figueiral MH, et al. Antimicrobial activity of a 3D-printed polymethylmethacrylate dental resin enhanced with graphene. Biomedicines. 2022;10(10):2607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Santos EO, Oliveira PLE, de Mello TP, Dos Santos ALS, Elias CN, Choi S-H, et al. Surface characteristics and microbiological analysis of a vat-photopolymerization additive-manufacturing dental resin. Mater (Basel). 2022;15(2):425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rubayo DD, Phasuk K, Vickery JM, Morton D, Lin W-S. Influences of build angle on the accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of additively manufactured surgical templates. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126(5):658–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Abacı Ö, Haliki A. Candida albicans’ ın virulans faktörleri. Orlab On-Line Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi. 2004;2(9):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gow NA, Brown AJ, Odds FC. Fungal morphogenesis and host invasion. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002;5(4):366–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang Y-L. Virulence factors of Candida species. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2003;36(4):223–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Strbac GD, Schnappauf A, Giannis K, Bertl MH, Moritz A, Ulm C. Guided autotransplantation of teeth: a novel method using virtually planned 3-dimensional templates. J Endod. 2016;42(12):1844–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Strbac GD, Schnappauf A, Giannis K, Moritz A, Ulm C. Guided modern endodontic surgery: a novel approach for guided osteotomy and root resection. J Endod. 2017;43(3):496–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Singh S, Palaskar JN, Mittal S. Comparative evaluation of surface porosities in conventional heat polymerized acrylic resin cured by water bath and microwave energy with microwavable acrylic resin cured by microwave energy. Contemp Clin Dent. 2013;4(2):147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Luo G, Samaranayake L. Candida Glabrata, an emerging fungal pathogen, exhibits superior relative cell surface hydrophobicity and adhesion to denture acrylic surfaces compared with Candida albicans. APMIS. 2002;110(9):601–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Silva S, Negri M, Henriques M, Oliveira R, Williams D, Azeredo J. Silicone colonization by non-Candida albicans Candida species in the presence of urine. J Med Microbiol. 2010;59(7):747–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Silva-Dias A, Miranda IM, Branco J, Monteiro-Soares M, Pina-Vaz C, Rodrigues AG. Adhesion, biofilm formation, cell surface hydrophobicity, and antifungal planktonic susceptibility: relationship among Candida spp. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Thaweboon S, Thaweboon B, Sopavanit C. Candidal adhesion to an oral obturator PMMA resin incorporated with vanillin. Key Eng Mater. 2023;942:71–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. He X, Meurman JH, Kari K, Rautemaa R, Samaranayake L. In vitro adhesion of Candida species to denture base materials. Mycoses. 2006;49(2):80–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cuéllar-Cruz M, Vega-González A, Mendoza-Novelo B, López-Romero E, Ruiz-Baca E, Quintanar-Escorza M, et al. The effect of biomaterials and antifungals on biofilm formation by Candida species: a review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:2513–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Negri M, Martins M, Henriques M, Svidzinski TI, Azeredo J, Oliveira R. Examination of potential virulence factors of Candida tropicalis clinical isolates from hospitalized patients. Mycopathologia. 2010;169:175–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Silva S, Henriques M, Oliveira R, Williams D, Azeredo J. In vitro biofilm activity of non-Candida albicans Candida species. Curr Microbiol. 2010;61:534–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ten Cate J, Klis F, Pereira-Cenci T, Crielaard W, De Groot P. Molecular and cellular mechanisms that lead to Candida biofilm formation. J Dent Res. 2009;88(2):105–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pereira-Cenci T, Del Bel Cury AA, Crielaard W, Ten Cate JM. Development of Candida-associated denture stomatitis: new insights. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16:86–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Hazen KC. Participation of yeast cell surface hydrophobicity in adherence of Candida albicans to human epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 1989;57(7):1894–900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Klotz S, Drutz D, Zajic J. Factors governing adherence of Candida species to plastic surfaces. Infect Immun. 1985;50(1):97–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Minagi S, Miyake Y, Inagaki K, Tsuru H, Suginaka H. Hydrophobic interaction in Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis adherence to various denture base resin materials. Infect Immun. 1985;47(1):11–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Cerca N, Pier GB, Vilanova M, Oliveira R, Azeredo J. Quantitative analysis of adhesion and biofilm formation on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Res Microbiol. 2005;156(4):506–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Li J, Hirota K, Goto T, Yumoto H, Miyake Y, Ichikawa T. Biofilm formation of Candida albicans on implant overdenture materials and its removal. J Dent. 2012;40(8):686–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kang S-H, Lee H-J, Hong S-H, Kim K-H, Kwon T-Y. Influence of surface characteristics on the adhesion of Candida albicans to various denture lining materials. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71(1):241–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. da Silva WJ, Leal CMB, Viu FC, Gonçalves LM, Barbosa CMR, Del Bel Cury AA. Influence of surface free energy of denture base and liner materials on Candida albicans biofilms. J Investig Clin Dent. 2015;6(2):141–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. De Foggi CC, Machado AL, Zamperini CA, Fernandes D, Wady AF, Vergani CE. Effect of surface roughness on the hydrophobicity of a denture-base acrylic resin and Candida albicans colonization. J Investig Clin Dent. 2016;7(2):141–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Song F, Koo H, Ren D. Effects of material properties on bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. J Dent Res. 2015;94(8):1027–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Dutra D, Pereira G, Kantorski K, Valandro L, Zanatta F. Does finishing and polishing of restorative materials affect bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation? A systematic review. Oper Dent. 2018;43(1):E37–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang J, Hung G-C, Nagamine K, Li B, Tsai S, Lo S-C. Development of Candida-specific Real-Time PCR assays for the detection and identification of eight medically important Candida species. Microbiol Insights. 2016;9:MBI.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wu P-F, Liu W-L, Hsieh M-H, Hii I-M, Lee Y-L, Lin Y-T, et al. Epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility of candidemia isolates of non-albicans Candida species from cancer patients: Non-albicans candidemia in cancer patients. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2017;6(1):1–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Pathirana RU, McCall AD, Norris HL, Edgerton M. Filamentous non-albicans Candida species adhere to Candida albicans and benefit from dual biofilm growth. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1188.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Arvanitis M, Anagnostou T, Fuchs BB, Caliendo AM, Mylonakis E. Molecular and nonmolecular diagnostic methods for invasive fungal infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(3):490–526.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Dean TR, Kohan M, Betancourt D, Menetrez MY. A simple polymerase chain reaction/restriction fragment length polymorphism assay capable of identifying medically relevant filamentous fungi. Mol Biotechnol. 2005;31:21–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Jordanides N, Allan E, McLintock L, Copland M, Devaney M, Stewart K, et al. A prospective study of Real-Time panfungal PCR for the early diagnosis of invasive fungal infection in haemato-oncology patients. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2005;35(4):389–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Mandviwala T, Shinde R, Kalra A, Sobel JD, Akins RA. High-throughput identification and quantification of Candida species using high resolution derivative melt analysis of panfungal amplicons. J Mol Diagn. 2010;12(1):91–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Schabereiter-Gurtner C, Selitsch B, Rotter ML, Hirschl AM, Willinger B. Development of novel Real-Time PCR assays for detection and differentiation of eleven medically important aspergillus and Candida species in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(3):906–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Extracted from Omer F. Turanoglu’s PhD dissertation entitled ‘Investigation of Candida spp. Adhesion on Resin Material Produced at Different Build Angles by Additive Manufacturing’, supervised by Asst. Prof. Dr. Esra Talay Cevlik and Asst. Prof. Dr. Caner Vural. The authors wish to convey their genuine appreciation to Ummahan Temel and Cansu Vural for their assistance.

Funding

Supported by Scientific Research Council of Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Grant/Award Number: DHF-22010.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Efeler, 09100, Turkey

    Omer F. Turanoglu & Esra Talay Cevlik

  2. Department of Biology, Molecular Biology Section, Faculty of Science, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Pamukkale, 20160, Turkey

    Caner Vural

Authors
  1. Omer F. Turanoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Esra Talay Cevlik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Caner Vural
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

O.F.T, E.T.C and C.V. analyzed and interpreted the data. CV and OFT performed the microbiological examination. O.F.T, E.T.C and C.V. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esra Talay Cevlik.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turanoglu, O.F., Talay Cevlik, E. & Vural, C. Investigation of adhesion status of Candida species to the surface of resin materials produced at different angles with additive manufacturing. BMC Oral Health 24, 738 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04505-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04505-1

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us