This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Morphological and functional characteristics of human gingival junctional epithelium
© Jiang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 10 September 2013
Accepted: 25 March 2014
Published: 3 April 2014
This study aims to observe the morphological characteristics and identify the function characteristics of junctional epithelium (JE) tissues and cultured JE cells.
Paraffin sections of human molar or premolar on the gingival buccolingual side were prepared from 6 subjects. HE staining and image analysis were performed to measure and compare the morphological difference among JE, oral gingival epithelium (OGE) and sulcular epithelium (SE). Immunohistochemistry was applied to detect the expression pattern of cytokeratin 5/6, 7, 8/18, 10/13, 16, 17, 19, and 20 in JE, OGE and SE. On the other hand, primary human JE and OGE cells were cultured in vitro. Cell identify was confirmed by histology and immunohistochemistry. In a co-culture model, TEM was used to observe the attachment formation between JE cells and tooth surface.
Human JE was a unique tissue which was different from SE and OGE in morphology. Similarly, morphology of JE cells was also particular compared with OGE cells cultured in vitro. In addition, JE cells had a longer incubation period than OGE cells. Different expression of several CKs illustrated JE was in a characteristic of low differentiation and high regeneration. After being co-cultured for 14 d, multiple cell layers, basement membrane-like and hemidesmosome-like structures were appeared at the junction of JE cell membrane and tooth surface.
JE is a specially stratified epithelium with low differentiation and high regeneration ability in gingival tissue both in vivo and in vitro. In co-culture model, human JE cells can form basement membrane-like and hemidesmosome-like structures in about 2 weeks.
Gingival epithelium consists of three regions: oral gingival epithelium (OGE), sulcular epithelium (SE) and Junctional epithelium (JE). JE is a specialized gingival epithelium locating at the junction of periodontal soft tissue and hard tissue, and attaching to the crown or root like a collar. JE cells are uniform in shape (either flat or spindle) and aligned parallel to the tooth surface, containing large intercellular spaces due to relaxed cell junctions . As a special structure at dento-gingival junction, JE is different from other epitheliums (OGE, SE) in origin, cell morphology, proliferation and differentiation [2, 3]. Meanwhile, it has been reported that JE is critical to maintain the integrity of periodontal tissue [4, 5] and is a key area for primary onset of periodontal diseases and treatments . Besides, Neutrophil a-defensins was found to localize in the junctional epithelium, which has significant effects on the epithelial integrity and functioning (keratinocyte adhesion, spread, and proliferation), and the effects are beyond their antibacterial activities . However, it is still unclear and controversial about JE in the differentiation, phagocytic activity, mechanism of its attachment to tooth surface, repair and reconstruction mechanism after injury [5, 8].
The conventional histological methods for investigation of JE in vivo are simplistic in approach and limited in the range of observation [9–12]. In recent years, scholars have studied the JE using in vitro cell culture models and molecular cytological techniques using animal and/or human OGE cells, periodontal ligament epithelial cells and oral epithelial cells [13–16]. Though these cells are oral epithelial cells, they cannot model primary JE cells completely due to differences in source, morphology, structure, differentiation and stimuli that induce proliferation.
Cytokeratins (CKs) are intermediate filament proteins of cytoskeleton family and are the major structural proteins in epithelial cells. As we know, the expression of keratins is one of the definitive characteristics of epithelial cells and reflects the biological properties of epithelial cells, including their origination, development, histological type, and level of differentiation [17, 18]. Several researches have studied the expression and distribution of a variety of CKs (CK-pan, 5/6, 7, 8/18, 10/13, 16, 17, 19, 20) in periodontal tissues of humans and animals, and the expression of some keratins in gingival epithelium were determined [15, 19–21]. For example, the expression patterns of CK10/13, 16, 19 in JE were different from that in OGE and SE; The especially high expression of CK19 in all layers of JE made it became a characteristical histological marker for JE in vivo [3, 22–24]. However, the expressions of various types of cytokeratin in JE and the difference with OGE and SE have not been systematically reported.
In this study, the morphological characteristics of JE tissues were examined by histological observation, image analysis and immunohistochemistry. The expression and distribution of a variety of CKs were determined in JE tissues and compared with OGE and SE. Besides, primary JE and OGE cells were cultured. The morphological structure and growth pattern of primary JE and OGE cells were observed and the expressions of specific keratins (CK-pan, 19, 10/13, 16) were also detected by immunohistochemistry. We suspect to identify the unique biological properties (morphology, regenerative potential) of JE in vivo and vitro. Furthermore, cultured human JE cells were seeded directly onto human root slices in a composite culture in order to explore the process of JE new attachment. This would provide experimental evidence for further study of how new attachment occurs after periodontal surgery and the formation of peri-implant tissue healing in clinic.
Morphological characteristics of human gingival epithelium tissues
Measured dimensions in human JE and SE
Width of JE (mm)
Thickness of JE (mm)
Area of JE (mm2)
Width of SE (mm)
Human JE and OGE cells culture
In primary culture, JE tissues were digested with 2 ml of DispaseII working solution at 4°C for 16-18 hours. The epithelium was separated from the lamina propria by forceps, and then cut into pieces, digested with 4 ml of 0.025% trypsin-0.01% EDTA for 5-8 minutes with stirring. The digestion was terminated by adding D-Hank’s solution containing 10% FBS, followed by filtration using 180 μm stainless steel sieve and then centrifugation. The precipitates were mixed in (defined keratinocyte growth medium) DKGM to form cell suspension. Cells were seeded in 24-well plates at 2 × 105 cells/ml, and placed in a 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator. The medium was refreshed after 3 days for the first time, then once a day. In passage culture, cells were passaged at 60-70% confluence by adding 0.25% trypsin-0.02% EDTA at 37°C for 5-8 min. When the cells appeared rounded under a microscope, the digestion was terminated. Then cells were suspended and centrifuged. DKGM was added to form cell suspension, and dispensed into new petri dishes. On the other hand, OGE cells were treated as JE cells above. Differently, the OGE tissue was cut into small pieces of 5 × 5 mm2. The OGE cell suspension was seeded at densities ranging from 5-10 × 105 cells/ml in petri dishes of 60 mm in diameter. The cultured cells were observed daily using inverted phase contrast microscope to track their morphology and growth conditions. In addition, the passaged single cell suspension was inoculated at densities ranging from 2-5 × 105 cells/ml onto cover slips in sterile petri-dishes. Then treated with H&E staining when cells were grown to 60% confluence, and observed using a light microscope to track changes on the morphology and structure.
Cell growth curve in JE and OGE cells
Primary JE, OGE cells at 100% confluence were digested to form single cell suspension and seeded at a density of 2 × 104/cm2 in 24-well plates. Cells in two random wells were counted daily using a hematocytometer. A cell growth curve was plotted by the average cell number each day versus the number of days. The doubling time was obtained from the growth curve which could indicate the length of time required for cells to double in number during the logarithmic phase.
Immunohistochemistry analysis of human gingival epithelium tissues and vitro cultured cells
Immunohistochemical peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (SP) method was performed on human gingival tissue by incubation with Anti-CK 5/6 (clone D5/16B4), anti-CK 7 (OV-TL12/30), anti-CK 8/18 (clone Zym5.2), anti-CK 10/13 (clone DE-K13), anti-CK 16 (clone LL025), anti-CK 17 (clone E3), anti-CK 19 (clone A53/BA2) and anti-CK 20 (clone Ks20.8). These anti-human cytokeratin monoclonal antibodies were obtained from Zymed (U.S.A). Human parotid gland tissue was stained as positive control  and the primary antibody replaced by PBS was used as negative control. The immunohistochemistry staining procedure was performed by Ab manufacturer’s instructions. Simply, dewaxed sections were incubated with pepsin solution at 37°C for 5-10 min, and incubated with blocking serum at room temperature for 30 min. Primary antibody at 1:50 dilution was added in the study group and the positive control. PBS instead of the primary antibody was added in the negative control. After being incubated at 4°C overnight, the sections were incubated in the working solution with biotin labeled secondary antibody at room temperature for 30 min, and followed with horseradish peroxidase labeled streptavidin solution at room temperature. DAB chromogenic solution was added for 5-10 min. Sections were rinsed with running water, re-stained with hematoxylin and mounted. On the other hand, passaged cells adhered to cover slips were fixed using 10% neutral formalin. The cells were treated as JE tissues above. In these cells, CK-Pan, CK19, CK10/13 and CK16 were detected. The cytoplasm of CK positive cells was stained and was classified as negative (-) with no coloring, weak positive (+) with coloring of light yellow, moderate positive (++) with coloring of yellow or strong positive (+ + +) with coloring of brown .
Co-culture of human JE cells and root slices
Teeth slices were from the same samples recruited for the JE primary cells. Samples were imbricated scrap using a Grace curette to remove the periodontal membrane. They were fixed in 10% neutral formalin for 12 h, and decalcified using Plank-Rychlo decalcification solution for 2 weeks. The dental crowns were removed and the teeth were sectioned along the root surface into dental films of 5 × 5 mm2 in size and 1-1.5 mm in thickness. The films were washed for 2-3d and soaked in D-Hank’s solution containing penicillin-streptomycin double antibiotics at 4°C before use. The passaged human JE cells suspension was inoculated at a density of 5 × 105 cells/ml on the root slices with the cementum surface up in 24-well plates, 2 to 3 slices per well, and placed for 14 d in a 37°C 5% CO2 saturation humidity incubator. The medium was refreshed 3 d later, and then once a day.
Observation using TEM: Root slices were collected 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 14 d after inoculation respectively and fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde at 4°C for 2 h. Root slices, with the cementum surface up, were cut into small pieces of 5 × 1 × 1 mm, post-fixed in 1% osmic acid at 4°C for 2 h, dehydrated by ethanol, soaked by propylene oxide at RT for 24 h, and embedded in araldite. The embedded specimens were cut into ultrathin slices, which were stained using lead citrate, followed by observation using TEM (PHILIP CM-120, Holland) to track the formation of JE cells attachment to the cementum surface.
Morphological analysis of human gingival epithelium tissues
According to measurements in the image analysis, JE tissue was 1.021 ± 0.128 mm in width, 0.066 ± 0.009 mm in thickness, and 0.042 ± 0.002 mm2 in area, while, the SE was 0.532 ± 0.176 mm in width (Table 1).
Morphological analysis of cultured human gingival JE and OGE cells in vitro
As the OGE cells, initially seeded primary cells presented polygonal or spherical shapes and adhered to the dish bottom within 24-72 h; After 5 d, cell clones formed with triangular or polygonal morphology, however, these cells were more uniform than the JE cell clones of the same period (Figure 4E); After 7-9 d, the OGE clones enlarged and converged, then tightly arranged and showed typical ‘paving stone-like’ keratinization (Figure 4F); After 9-11 d, the cells were about 100% confluent; In the second passage, cells adhered and stretched in 48 h. And then the ‘giant cells’ appeared (Figure 4G); After being passaged for 4 times, cells were mainly ‘giant cells’ and proliferation slowed down also with aging and death signs (Figure 4H).
Growth condition of cultured JE and OGE cells in vitro
Immunohistochemistry analysis of human gingival epithelium tissues and cultured cells in vitro
Expression pattern of different cytokeratins in JE, OGE, and SE
Sample no. (n)
Slice no. (n)
TEM observation of the formation of JE cells attachment to root slices
JE is a unique human gingival epithelium tissue
According to the observation of tissues, we found that normal human JE tissue belonged to simple stratified epithelium. The cells were uniform in shape, relatively lower in differentiation, without keratinization and epithelial ridges in vivo. This is probably due to its location at the bottom of the gingival sulcus, tooth surface attachment and rarely subjected to external stimulation. However, the SE and OGE are exposed to oral cavity environment and exhibit typical characteristics of squamous epithelium cells. They were polygon in shape, tightly aligned, keratinized in the surface layer with dense epithelial ridges which projected into the connective tissue, and present a clear boundary with JE. In preliminary experiments, epithelial ridges were also seen in JE of gingival atrophy or periodontal pockets. These suggest that external stimulation and inflammation may result in the formation of epithelial ridges. Additionally, image analysis results showed that JE was only about 1 mm in length, 60 μm in width, and 15 to 20 layers of cells deep. This result showed that the volume of JE tissue was extremely small and difficult to collect, which is one of the major reasons why JE is difficult to study. On the other hand, JE and OGE cells were isolated and cultured in vitro. As a result, the cell morphology of JE cells was significantly different from typical-keratinizing OGE cells. JE cells were similar to connective tissue fibroblasts in cell morphology and varied in morphology. This indicates that JE is a unique poorly-differentiated epithelium in the gingival.
Growth conditions of JE and OGE cells in vitro
On the growth curve, JE cells had a longer incubation period than OGE cells, account for half of the growth cycle. Then JE cells accelerated proliferate to the peak, and immediately followed by recession. By comparison, OGE cells entered into a longer period of proliferation after a short incubation period, then followed by slow recession. In addition, the cell doubling time of JE cells was shorter than OGE. However, JE could passage fewer times than OGE cells. Possible reasons for these differences may be explained as follows. In vivo, JE is located at the gingival sulcus bottom. This is a closed environment where the cells are rarely differentiated. Thus, there will be a long incubation period for JE cells to adapt the new environment. After adaption, JE cells have a unique ability to proliferate rapidly and reach contact inhibition in a relatively short period. By comparison, OGE cells are always contact with the outside, the cell differentiation is high, and the ability to adapt to the environment is strong. Thus, the growth curve was gentle changed in OGE cells.
Analysis of variety expressed CKs
Varieties of CKs were expressed in the oral epithelial cells at different levels depending on the location within the oral cavity. In this study, expression of CK5/6  was negative in the basal layer of all three types of gingival epithelium. The positive stain in the suprabasal layer may derive from CK6 . As a marker for single layer epithelium, CK8 and 18 are generally not expressed in squamous epithelium. Bampton et al. showed that CK8/18 was not expressed in JE, but expressed in vitro cultured gingival epithelial cells . Mackenzie et al. showed that CK8/18 could express in OGE and SE but not constantly , while Pritlove-Carson et al. showed that the expression of CK8/18 in JE increased in inflammation . In this study, we found that CK8/18 expressed in all layers of JE but only in the basal layer of OGE and SE (in some slices, it also showed weak positive expression in the suprabasal layer). The result is same with the studies by Mackenzie et al. The expression pattern of CK19 was similar to CK8/18, but CK19 expressed higher and the boundary between JE and SE was clearly due to significant differences in staining. Previous studies have shown that CK19 is highly expressed in newly erupted JE , regenerated JE after surgical operation , epithelium inside the periodontal pocket , inflammatory gingival epithelium  and vitro cultured epithelial cells of the periodontal pocket . It can be used as a marker for gingival epithelium with continuous differentiation . The expression patterns of CK8/18 and 19 certificate that JE is a specialized epithelium different from general squamous epithelium. Silimilarly, the strong positive expression of the epithelial differentiation-associated marker CK19 was also found in cultured JE cells which further indicates that JE cells are in a continuous state of differentiation.
However, some CKs were differently expressed in vitro and vivo. CK16 was expressed in all layers of JE but mainly in the suprabasal layer of OGE [3, 29]. However, it was scattered positively stained in both OGE and JE. Strong positive expression of CK10/13 [15, 22, 29] was found in suprabasal layer and negative in basal layer of OGE. While both JE and OGE cells were weak positive or positive stained. These differences may be explained by the non-specific of antibody or the different growth conditions. Therefore, they could not be used for a clear distinction between JE and OGE.
The same expression pattern of a variety of CKs in OGE and SE indicates they are the same type of epithelium. However, OGE and SE were greatly different with JE. Most CKs were widely expressed in JE (such as CK10/13, 16, 19) and highly expressed (such as CK5/6, 8/18, 19). Usually, tissues or cells with a low differentiation level are more active in proliferation. It explains why JE is rapidly regenerated. Moreover, the expression of CKs was more widespread and in a higher level in the suprabasal layer (especially close to the surface) than that of the basal layer, such as CK5/6, 8/18, 19, and 20 [30, 31]. Most of these highly expressed CKs reflect both a high proliferation ability and high level of differentiation [8, 20, 22, 30, 31]. As a consequence, the suprabasal layer of JE has a lower differentiation but higher regeneration ability than the basal layer. This appears to go against the biological nature of regular epithelium, but further illustrates the unique biological characteristics of JE. However, the indicative function of these CKs was objective. Further researches on JE were still needed.
Co-cultured JE cells and root slices
Human gingival tissue blocks (1 × 1 × 2 mm3) and dentin slices or a millipore filter were co-cultured previously . As a result, the dentin slices and epithelial cells formed hemidesmosomes-like and basement membrane-like structures. The structures were similar to JE-tooth surface adhesion. But there was no such structure formed between the millipore filter and the cells. Oksanen et al.  also observed a large number of electron-dense plaques at the junction of cultured rat oral epithelial cells and tooth slices, where formed hemidesmosome-like structures. JE is usually attached to the enamel of the tooth neck. But when periodontal tissues are destroyed and periodontal pockets are formed. JE are receded to the root and formed attachments on the cementum surface of the root. Therefore, in this study we selected human root slices instead of dentin slices. As a result, many cells adhered onto the cementum surface after 11 d co-cultured. While, JE cells cultured in petri dish were reached almost 100% confluence in the same period (11 d). Then we suspect the attachment may be associated with the surface treatment of the carrier. The petri dish surface is smooth and easy for cells to attach and stretch. In contrast, the cementum surface is rough and not conducive for cells to attach. It verifies the importance of root surface smoothness through periodontal scaling to facilitate the regeneration of cell new attachment. In composite culture, multi-layer cells and intensive hemidesmosome- like structures appeared within 11-14 d. This indicates the attachment between JE cells and tooth surface was formed in about 2 weeks. However, the environment in vivo is complicated which will be affected by many factors. For example, infected root surface and subgingival may delay the formation of periodontal new attachment in clinic. Therefore, clinical studies on JE attachment are still need to be studied.
JE is a special stratified epithelium with low differentiation and high regeneration ability in the gingival tissue. In co-culture model, human JE cells can form basement membrane-like and hemidesmosome-like structures in about 2 weeks.
Funding: This study was supported by the Foundation of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (No 336, 2009).
- Jiang Q, Li D: Comparative study on the histomorphology of the JE of human and several laboratory animals]. Shanghai Kou qiang Yi Xue = Shanghai J Stomatology. 2004, 13 (6): 539-Google Scholar
- Willberg J, Syrjänen S, Hormia M: Junctional epithelium in rats is characterized by slow cell proliferation. J Periodontol. 2006, 77 (5): 840-846. 10.1902/jop.2006.050213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pritlove-Carson S, Charlesworth S, Morgan PR, Palmer RM: Cytokeratin phenotypes at the dento-gingival junction in relative health and inflammation, in smokers and nonsmokers. Oral Dis. 1997, 3 (1): 19-24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Newman MG, Takei H, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA: Carranza's Clinical Periodontology. 2011, Philadelphia: Elsevier Health SciencesGoogle Scholar
- Hormia M, Owaribe K, Virtanen I: The dento-epithelial junction: cell adhesion by type I hemidesmosomes in the absence of a true basal lamina. J Periodontol. 2001, 72 (6): 788-797. 10.1902/jop.2001.72.6.788.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schroeder HE, Listgarten MA: The junctional epithelium: from strength to defense. J Dent Res. 2003, 82 (3): 158-161. 10.1177/154405910308200302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gursoy UK, Könönen E, Luukkonen N, Uitto V-J: Human neutrophil defensins and their effect on epithelial cells. J Periodontol. 2013, 84 (1): 126-133. 10.1902/jop.2012.120017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shimono M, Ishikawa T, Enokiya Y, Muramatsu T, Matsuzaka K-i, Inoue T, Abiko Y, Yamaza T, Kido MA, Tanaka T: Biological characteristics of the junctional epithelium. J Electron Microsc. 2003, 52 (6): 627-639. 10.1093/jmicro/52.6.627.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heymann R, Wroblewski J, Terling C, Midtvedt T, Öbrink B: The characteristic cellular organization and CEACAM1 expression in the junctional epithelium of rats and mice are genetically programmed and not influenced by the bacterial microflora. J Periodontol. 2001, 72 (4): 454-460. 10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.454.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oksanen J, Sorokin L, Virtanen I, Hormia M: The junctional epithelium around murine teeth differs from gingival epithelium in its basement membrane composition. J Dent Res. 2001, 80 (12): 2093-2097. 10.1177/00220345010800121401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marchetti C, Farina A, Cornaglia AI: Microscopic, immunocytochemical, and ultrastructural properties of peri-implant mucosa in humans. J Periodontol. 2002, 73 (5): 555-563. 10.1902/jop.2002.73.5.555.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ishikawa H, Hashimoto S, Tanno M, Ishikawa T, Tanaka T, Shimono M: Cytoskeleton and surface structures of cells directly attached to the tooth in the rat junctional epithelium. J Periodontal Res. 2005, 40 (4): 354-363. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00815.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pan YM, Firth J, Salonen J, Uitto VJ: Multilayer culture of periodontal ligament epithelial cells: a model for junctional epithelium. J Periodontal Res. 1995, 30 (2): 97-107. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1995.tb01258.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomakidi P, Fusenig N, Kohl A, Komposch G: Histomorphological and biochemical differentiation capacity in organotypic co‒cultures of primary gingival cells. J Periodontal Res. 1997, 32 (4): 388-400. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1997.tb00549.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Papaioannou W, Cassiman J-J, Oord JV, Vos RD, Steenberghe D, Quirynen M: Multi-layered periodontal pocket epithelium reconstituted in vitro: histology and cytokeratin profiles. J Periodontol. 1999, 70 (6): 668-678. 10.1902/jop.1918.104.22.1688.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oksanen J, Hormia M: An organotypic in vitro model that mimics the dento-epithelial junction. J Periodontol. 2002, 73 (1): 86-93. 10.1902/jop.2002.73.1.86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pitaru S, McCulloch CA, Narayanan SA: Cellular origins and differentiation control mechanisms during periodontal development and wound healing. J Periodontal Res. 1994, 29 (2): 81-94. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1994.tb01095.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moll R, Divo M, Langbein L: The human keratins: biology and pathology. Histochem Cell Biol. 2008, 129 (6): 705-733. 10.1007/s00418-008-0435-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mackenzie I, Rittman G, Gao Z, Leigh I, Lane E: Patterns of cytokeratin expression in human gingival epithelia. J Periodontal Res. 1991, 26 (6): 468-478. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1991.tb01797.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mackenzie I, Gao Z: Patterns of cytokeratin expression in the epithelia of inflamed human gingiva and periodontal pockets. J Periodontal Res. 1993, 28 (1): 49-59. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1993.tb01050.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagarakanti S, Ramya S, Babu P, Arun K, Sudarsan S: Differential expression of E-Cadherin and cytokeratin 19 and net proliferative rate of gingival keratinocytes in oral epithelium in periodontal health and disease. J Periodontol. 2007, 78 (11): 2197-2202. 10.1902/jop.2007.070070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feghali-Assaly M, Sawaf M, Serres G, Forest N, Ouhayoun J: Cytokeratin profile of the junctional epithelium in partially erupted teeth. J Periodontal Res. 1994, 29 (3): 185-195. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1994.tb01212.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sculean A, Berakdar M, Pahl S, Windisch P, Brecx M, Reich E, Donos N: Patterns of cytokeratin expression in monkey and human periodontium following regenerative and conventional periodontal surgery. J Periodontal Res. 2001, 36 (4): 260-268. 10.1034/j.1600-0765.2001.036004260.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiang Q, Li D: Cytokeratin expression in human junctional epithelium, oral epithelium and sulcular epithelium]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi = Zhonghua Kouqiang Yixue Zazhi = Chin J Stomatol. 2005, 40 (4): 298-Google Scholar
- Kjörell U, Östberg Y, Virtanen I, Thornell L-E: Immunohistochemical analyses of autoimmune sialadenitis in man. J Oral Pathol Med. 1988, 17 (8): 374-380. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1988.tb01300.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tavakoli M, Bateni E, Attarbashi-Moghadam F, Talebi A, Yaghini J, Mogharehabed A: Comparison of fibronectin in human marginal gingiva and interdental papilla using immunohistochemistry. Dent Res J. 2011, 8 (Suppl1): S109-Google Scholar
- Bampton JL, Shirlaw PJ, Topley S, Weller P, Wilton JM: Human junctional epithelium: demonstration of a new marker, its growth in vitro and characterization by lectin reactivity and keratin expression. J Investig Dermatol. 1991, 96 (5): 708-717. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12470948.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abe Y, Hara Y, Sakua T, Kato I: Immunohistological study of cytokeratin 19 expression in regenerated junctional epithelium of rats. J Periodontal Res. 1994, 29 (6): 418-420. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1994.tb01243.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feghall-Assaly M, Sawaf M, Ouhayoun J: In situ hybridization study of cytokeratin 4, 13, 16 and 19 mRNAs in human developing junctional epithelium. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997, 105 (6): 599-608. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00224.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barrett A, Cort E, Patel P, Berkovitz B: An immunohistological study of cytokeratin 20 in human and mammalian oral epithelium. Arch Oral Biol. 2000, 45 (10): 879-887. 10.1016/S0003-9969(00)00050-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu Q, Samaranayake LP, Darveau RP, Jin L: Expression of human β-defensin-3 in gingival epithelia. J Periodontal Res. 2005, 40 (6): 474-481. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00827.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salonen J, Santti R: An attempt to simulate junctional epithelium of human gingiva in vitro. J Periodontal Res. 1983, 18 (3): 311-317. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1983.tb00365.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/14/30/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.