Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Oral Health

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Caries prevalence and impact on oral health-related quality of life in children with sickle cell disease: cross-sectional study

  • Maria Luiza Matta Felisberto Fernandes1Email author,
  • Ichiro Kawachi2,
  • Patrícia Corrêa-Faria1,
  • Marcos Pascoal Pattusi3,
  • Saul Martins Paiva1 and
  • Isabela Almeida Pordeus1
BMC Oral Health201515:68

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0052-4

Received: 22 January 2015

Accepted: 1 June 2015

Published: 18 June 2015

Abstract

Background

Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) may present oral conditions that can compromise children's health even more. However, there is still no consensus on the association between SCD and dental caries. The aim of this study was to assess caries prevalence in children with sickle cell disease (SCD), and the association of dental caries with socioeconomic factors, disease severity, and oral-health related to quality of life (OHRQoL).

Methods

The sample was comprised of 106 children with SCD aged 8 to 14 years who were attending the Center for Hematology (Hemominas) in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. They were matched to 385 healthy peers. Data collection included interviews with guardians concerning SCD characteristics, and previous social and oral examinations to determine the caries prevalence. Caries prevalence as measured through the Decayed, Missing and Filled (dmft and DMFT) indices. OHRQoL was evaluated through the Brazilian versions of the Child Perceptions Questionnaires (CPQ8–10, and CPQ11–14 short-form version). Statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square test or Fisher`s exact test and the Mann Whitney test, as well as linear regression.

Results

The DMFT index was 1.3 (SD: 2.1) in younger children with SCD and 1.5 (SD: 1.9) in SCD teens. Younger children with SCD had lower caries experience compared to healthy peers (p = .03). The experience of dental caries among teens with SCD was similar to healthy peers (p > 0.05). In addition, we did not see a significant difference on the mean overall scores of CPQ8–10 between SCD younger children and controls. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean overall scores of teens CPQ11-14 between SCD and the control group. Socioeconomic variables were not associated with dental caries in the participants with SCD. However, SCD severity was associated with higher DMFT indexes (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Younger children with SCD had a low experience of dental caries. The dental caries experience in teenagers with SCD was similar to their healthy peers. OHRQoL was similar between SCD participants and controls.

Keywords

Quality of lifeSickle cell diseaseDental cariesSocioeconomic factors

Background

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is one of the most widespread genetic disorders worldwide, and the genotype (HbSS) is the most common and severe form of the disease [1]. Global estimates suggest that more than 312,000 infants are born with HbSS each year [2]. The United States and Europe together represent 2 % of annual SCD births worldwide [3]. The vast majority of sickle cell births occur in the developing world, with an estimated 230,000 annual HbSS births in sub-Saharan Africa [3]. Each year, 3,500 children in Brazil are born with SCD. Within Brazil, the state of Minas Gerais ranks third in prevalence of the disease [4].

The pathological effects of sickle cell disease also occur in dental tissues and the oral cavity. SCD has been linked to delayed tooth erosion, hypoplasia and hypomineralization, hypercementosis, pulp stones, and asymptomatic pulp necrosis due to thrombosis in the blood vessels [5]. There is no consensus regarding the caries experience in SCD patients compared to healthy controls. According to a study carried out with American teenagers, there was no difference in the caries experience among patients with SCD and their controls [6]. However, others studies related differences among individuals with SCD and without this disease [7, 8]. The greater occurrence of dental caries in individuals with SCD has been attributed to the presence of enamel hypomineralization. The hypomineralization of the enamel matrix, due to metabolic and hormonal disturbances, would increase the risk of dental caries in these individuals [9]. Other explanations were a lower priority in seeking dental care, especially among individuals with a lower income, and the reluctance of dentists to treat these individuals due of fear of trans- and postoperative complications [10].

The greatest risk of developing caries is also related to frequent hospitalizations due to health complications associated with greater consumption of medication, like antibiotics containing sucrose [11, 12]. On the other hand, children younger than six years old who were taking daily penicillin were reported to have decreased colonization of Streptococcus mutans and, therefore, a lower caries experience when compared to healthy individuals who were not taking antibiotics. This difference, however, only existed as long as penicillin was administered [8]. Matos et al. [13] observed a similar caries prevalence and counts of lactobacilli and streptococci in SCD children compared to healthy controls. However, the controls showed a lower salivary buffering capacity. Income significantly influenced the dmft index, when caries prevalence and socioeconomic factors was investigated in 160 SCD patients, aged 3 to 12 years in Recife, Brazil [12].

Regardless of the impact of SCD on dental tissues, the oral health of these individuals is essential to prevent dental infections that could precipitate a vaso-occlusive crisis [14] or act as a bacterial source for development of osteomyelitis of the mandible, which has lost its blood supply [15]. The aim of this study was to investigate the experience of dental caries in a Brazilian pediatric population with SCD, analyzing possible associations with the history and severity of the SCD, socio-economic factors, and their impact on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).

Methods

The study was conducted in the city of Belo Horizonte, capital of the State of Minas Gerais in southeast Brazil. The study sample was made up of children with sickle cell disease, resident in the metropolitan region of Belo Horizonte, from ages 8 to 14 years old, sampled from the patient registry of the Referral Center for Hematology and Transfusion Services in the State of Minas Gerais (Hemominas-MG). The Human Ethics Committee of Hemominas, and the Dental School of the Federal University of Minas Gerais approved this study under the following protocols 289 and CEP225.951. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or guardians and the participants of this study.

Sample characteristics and study design

The investigation was designed as a cross-sectional study. A total of 491 children participated in the study. The participants were divided into two groups: a group with SCD consisting of 106 recruited patients with SCD treated at the Hemominas (56 younger children aged 8–10 years and 50 teens aged 11–14 years), and a comparison group comprising of 385 randomly-selected, healthy children (205 healthy younger children aged 8–10 years and 180 healthy teens aged 11–14 years).

Our sample size was calculated from the expected standard deviations of the quality of life scales to evaluate oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) CPQ8–10 (10.7) and CPQ11–14 (10.1) from a pilot study. The pilot was conducted among a random sample of 34 younger children and 35 teens with SCD in Hemominas-MG. We assumed five points of difference in quality of life scores of SCD patients and a 95 % confidence interval (95% CI). The sample size required was 51 children with SCD and 45 teens with SCD. However 56 younger children with SCD and 50 teens with SCD participated in the study, representing the totality of children with SCD listed at the patient registry in Hemominas, who met the eligibility criteria for the study. We select 180 healthy teens and 205 healthy younger children who were enrolled at the same school and in the same class those SCD children, matched by age and sex. The option to match one case per at least three controls was based on the fact that healthy controls could be less motivated than individuals in a health-care setting [16].

Eligibility criteria for inclusion in the SCD group were as follows: patients aged 8 to 14 years, a diagnosis of SCD HbSS in their medical records, not suffering from a painful crisis at the time of the survey, no medical conditions other than SCD, no emergency dental appointment in the past three months, and did not have an intellectual disability. Eligibility for the healthy control group included: No organic, physiologic, or psychiatric disturbance, no intellectual disability, and no emergency dental appointment in the past three months.

Training and calibration exercise

The research team was made up of a dentist and four dental researchers. The calibration exercise consisted of two steps. The first step involved a discussion of the criteria established for the diagnosis of each oral health condition through an analysis of 30 photographs. Photographs for dental caries experience included all possible classifications used in this study. A specialist in pediatric dentistry coordinated this step. The next step was performed at Hemominas and consisted of the examination of 10 children aged 10–14 years. The exams were performed on two separate occasions with a one-week interval between sessions. Data analysis involved the calculation of Kappa coefficients (K = 0.89 for interexaminer agreement and K = 0.87 for intraexaminer agreement).

Data collection

Interviews and dental exams were carried out in private rooms at Hemominas and schools during the day, under natural light.

A qualified dentist performed an intra-oral exam on each patient using a disposable mirror, CPI probes and gauzes. For the examination of the oral condition, we used an exam sheet to determine the DMFT/dmft indexes (separately for permanent teeth and deciduous teeth) and bleeding on probing according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria [17]. During the clinical examination, the examiner wore personal protective equipment (PPE) that met biosecurity standards.

Data about individual characteristics, socio-economic characteristics and factors related to the disease were collected through direct questioning of the parents or guardians. History of clinical severity was assessed for SCD patients through direct questioning about their frequency of episodes of pain and hospitalization and duration of symptoms, number of associated comorbid conditions, presence of ulcers, and if he (she) is being treated with a blood transfusion. The clinical severity was converted into a score from the sum of the factors related to disease reported by the parents.

A separate researcher (based in a dental research department) read the questions about Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) to respondents, leaving them to mark the answer sheet. For OHRQoL, the Brazilian versions of the Child Perceptions Questionnaires were used for younger children ages 8–10 years (CPQ8–10) [18] and for teenagers ages 11–14 years (CPQ11–14 short-form version) [19]. CPQ items are distributed into four domains: oral symptoms, functional limitations, emotional well-being and social well-being. A scale was used with the response options of: never = 0; once or twice = 1; sometimes = 2; often = 3 and very often = 4. A high score indicated a more negative impact on OHRQoL. The CPQ8–10 is composed of 25 questions and the short-form version of CPQ11–14 is composed of 16 questions. The minimum possible score is zero, and the maximum score is 100 for the CPQ8–10, and range 0–64 points for the short –form of CPQ11–14.

Statistical analysis

The program Epi info™7 was used for double data entry . Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 20). Descriptive and univariate analyses were performed separately for SCD and healthy children (SCD and controls). The responses to categorical questions by group were compared using either a chi-square test or Fisher`s exact test for contingency tables with small cell counts. The nonparametric Mann Whitney test was used to compare medians of continuous variables between SCD and control groups.

Using the Chi-square test we checked the association between dental caries (No/Yes) and independent variables (individual characteristics, factors related to the disease, socio-economic factors and oral conditions) among SCD patients. In multivariable linear regression analyses of DMFT, we controlled the age and gender at the time of interview.

Results

The data collection from patients with SCD was performed in Hemominas from January to July of 2012. In order to collect healthy peers, 100 schools were visited from August 2012 to December 2013. All of them were from public schools, and classified as low socioeconomic status (SES).

The response rate was 100 % in both case and comparison groups. In the SCD group there were 106 children: 56 younger children (31 boys and 25 girls) with an average age of 8.9 (SD = 0.87) years and 50 teens (30 boys and 20 girls) with an average age of 12.0 (SD = 1.08) years. There were 385 healthy school children in the comparison group. In this group, there were 205 younger children (112 boys and 93 girls) with an average age of 8.9 (SD = 0.8) years and 180 teens (106 boys and 74 girls) with an average age of 11.9 (SD = 1.0) years (Tables 1 and 2). At least three children who were in the same class as the children with SCD were recruited as controls.
Table 1

Descriptive and comparative analysis per individual characteristics, factors related to the disease, socio-economic factors, oral conditions, and negative impact in OHRQoL between younger children (8–10 years) with SCD and control group

 

Children SCD N (%)

Children control-group N (%)

Individual characteristics

  

Gender

  

Male

31 (55.3)

112 (54.6)

Female

25 (44.7)

93 (45.4)

Child living with biological parents

  

No

21 (41.1)

46 (29.0)

Yes

30 (58.9)

113 (71.0)

Factors related to the disease

  

Religiosity

6 (10.7)

 

No

6 (10.7)

 

Sometimes

7 (12.5)

 

Frequently

43 (76.8)

 

Race

  

White

9 (16)

 

Black

19 (34)

 

Mix

28 (50)

 

Age of diagnostic SCD

  

<7 months old

52 (95.5)

 

7 months - 3 years

3 (5.0)

 

Socio-economic factors

  

Home overcrowding

 <2 people/room

32 (57.0)

101 (49.3)

 >2 people/room

24 (43.0)

104 (50.7)

Mother education**

 ≤8 years

44 (86.0)

99 (66.5)

 >8 years

7 (14.0)

57 (36.5)

Father education**

 ≤8 years

35 (83.0)

89 (60.5)

 >8 years

7 (17.0)

58 (39.5)

Own house

 No

32 (63.0)

100 (62.9)

 Yes

19 (37.0)

59 (37.1)

Own car**

 No

47 (92.0)

117 (73.6)

 Yes

4 (8.0)

42 (26.4)

Family income U$/month (mean/SD)

584.4 (245.2)

615.8 (274.7)

Oral conditions

DMFT/dmft (mean/SD)*

1.3 (2.1)

1.8 (2.0)

Decayed (mean/SD)

0.9 (1.8)

1.1 (1.5)

Missing (mean/SD)

0

0.2 (0.6)

Filled (mean/SD)

0.4 (1.2)

0.5 (1.0)

Gingival bleeding (n (%)

 No

47 (84.0)

182 (88.8)

 Yes

9 (16.0)

23 (11.2)

*p < .05; **p < .01; Chi-square test, Mann–Whitney test or Fisher's exact test

Table 2

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the CPQ8–10 subscales for younger children with SCD and controls (8–10 years)

Domains - CPQ8–10

SCD children mean (SD) N = 56

Controls children mean (SD) N = 205

Oral symptoms

27.68 (17.86)

29.37 (18.82)

Functional limitations

14.11 (15.73)

17.78 (18.96)

Emotional well-being

16.79 (22.55)

19.68 (23.48)

Social well-being

7.23 (8.95)

11.46 (15.56)

Overall CPQ8–10

14.51 (12.0)

17.95 (15.0)

In the group of younger children, there was a verified significant difference in the dmft/DMFT, fathers´/mothers´ education, and car ownership among SCD patients and controls (Table 1). The mean overall scores of CPQ8–10 in younger children with SCD and their controls were respectively 14.5 (±12) and 17.9 (±15). Table 2 shows the mean of responses to the domains on the CPQ8–10. There was no difference in the mean overall score of CPQ 8–10 among SCD patients and controls (Table 1).

There was no significant difference in mean dmft/DMFT among the teenagers with SCD and their controls (Table 3). Teens with SCD were less likely to be living with both biological parents compared to healthy controls (p < .001) and the family income (U$/month) was higher in SCD teens group (p < .001). Both maternal and paternal schooling was higher in the SCD teen group (p < .001). In the SCD group, only the adolescents had higher prevalence of gingival bleeding than their healthy peers (p < .001) (Table 3). There was no difference in the mean overall score of CPQ 11–14 among SCD teenagers and healthy peers. The mean scores of the domains of the CPQ 11–14 are presented in Table 4. All participants completed the CPQ8-10 or CPQ11-14. There were no missing answers of the participants in the CPQ.
Table 3

Descriptive and comparative analysis per individual characteristics, factors related to the disease, socio-economic factors, oral conditions, and negative impact in OHRQoL between teens with SCD and control group

 

Teens SCD N (%)

Teens control-group N (%)

Individual characteristics

Gender

 Male

30 (60.0)

106 (58.9)

 Female

20 (40.0)

74 (41.1)

Child living with biological parents***

 No

30 (73.0)

56 (38.9)

 Yes

11 (27.0)

88 (61.1)

Factors related to the disease

Religiosity

No

9 (18.0)

 

Sometimes

14 (28.0)

 

Frequently

27 (54.0)

 

Race

 White

6 (12.0)

 

 Black

19 (38.0)

 

 Mix

25 (50.0

 

Age of diagnostic SCD

 <7 months old

47 (94.0)

 

 7 months - 3 years

3 (6.0)

 

Socio-economic factors

Home overcrowding

 <2 people/room

25 (64.0)

90 (62.0)

 >2 people/room

14 (36.0)

55 (38.0)

Mother education***

 ≤8 years

22 (58.0)

132 (91.7)

 >8 years

16 (42.0)

12. (8.3)

Father education***

 ≤8 years

14 (61.0)

120 (83.3)

 >8 years

9 (39.0)

24 (16.7)

Own house

No

31 (76.0)

91 (85.9)

Yes

10 (24.0)

53 (14.1)

Own car

 No

40 (98.0)

128 (88.9)

 Yes

2 (1.0)

18 (11.1)

Family income U$/month (mean/SD)***

1463 (671)

628 (257)

Oral conditions

DMFT/dmft (mean/SD)*

1.5 (1.9)

2.1 (2.8)

Decayed (mean/SD)

1.0 (1.4)

1.0 (1.7)

Missing (mean/SD)

0.1 (0.6)

0.2 (0.7)

Filled (mean/SD)

0.4 (0.8)

0.8 (1.7)

Gingival bleeding***

 No

23 (46.0)

152 (84.4)

 Yes

27 (54.0)

28 (15.6)

*p < .05; **p < .01; Chi-square test, Mann–Whitney test or Fisher's exact test

Table 4

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the CPQ11–14 subscales for SCD teens and controls (11–14 years)

Domains - CPQ11–14

SCD teens mean(SD) N = 50

Controls teens mean (SD) N = 180

Oral symptoms

5.38 (3.40)

4.89 (2.82)

Functional limitations

4.68 (3.62)

3.33 (2.96)

Emotional well-being

3.22 (3.23)

3.71 (3.95)

Social well-being

2.78 (3.49)

2.52 (3.43)

Overall CPQ11–14

16.06 (11.65)

14.37 (9.73)

Table 5 shows the results combining the SCD patients and healthy controls. The linear regressions explore the factors related to dmft/DMFT in younger children and teenagers particular to the factor of having SCD. In both younger children and teenagers, diagnosis of SCD was not associated with higher dmft/DMFT indexes. In fact, the only statistically significant determinant of dmft/DMFT in the overall sample was lower family income among the younger children’s group (p < .01).
Table 5

Beta coefficients of DMFT in children and teens (SCD and control groups) by individual characteristics, factor related to the disease, socio-economic factors, oral conditions

DMFT (Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth index)

Children SCD and Control group

Teens SCD and Control-group

Predictors

β

SE

β

SE

Age

0.07

0.16

0.20

0.15

Gender boy

0.23

0.27

0.47

0.31

Child living with both biol parents

−0.05

0.34

−0.53

0.36

SCD

0.18

0.34

0.97

0.67

Family income (U$/month)

−0.0011

0.0004**

0.00055

0.00057

Home overcrowding (>2 people/room)

0.14

0.35

0.08

0.32

Mother education

0.14

0.32

−0.41

0.50

Father education

−0.38

0.32

0.38

0.42

Own House

−0.26

0.33

0.18

0.33

Own Car

0.58

0.35

−0.31

0.48

Gingival bleeding

0.50

0.38

0.28

0.37

Children n = 261; Teens n = 230, β = Beta coeficiente, SE = standard error *p < .05, ** p < .01

Table 6 presents the findings restricted to SCD patients. The socioeconomic variables of income and the level of schooling of the father and mother were not associated with dental caries experience among SCD patients. Only the severity of SCD was associated with higher dmft/DMFT (p = 0.03).
Table 6

Beta coefficients of dmft/DMFT in all patients with SCD by individual characteristics, factors related to the disease, socio-economic factors, and oral conditions (n = 106)

DMFT (Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth index)

SCD patients

Predictors

β

SE

Individual characteristics

Age

0.37

0.20

Gender boy

0.18

0.48

Child living with both biol parents

0.18

0.54

Factor related to the disease

Diag.age

0.23

1.93

SCD Severitya*

0.28

0.12

Socio-economic factors

Family income (U$/month)

−0.0000590

0.0006535

Home overcrowding (>2 people/room)

0.20

0.54

Mother education

0.16

0.66

Father education

0.82

0.60

Own House

0.67

0.54

Own Car

0.95

0.90

Oral conditions

Gingival bleeding

0.31

0.61

DAI

0.014

0.027

n = 106, SE = standard error *p < .05

aSCD Severity: sum of episodes of pain and hospitalization and time occurred (for about a month), number of associated comorbid conditions, presence of ulcers, and if he(she) is being treated with blood transfusion

Discussion

The present investigation compared the occurrence of dental caries among children and teens with and without SCD. There was a low occurrence of dental caries in children with SCD in comparison to their controls. Among teens, we found no statistical differences when compared to controls in their caries experience, measured by the DMFT index, or the prevalence of untreated caries observed by the decayed component. Our result is similar to that observed in a study of 54 American teenagers with a mean age of 14 years, with sickle cell disease genotypes HbSS and HbSC [6]. The mean DMFT found in the afore mentioned study was 1.94 (2.7) in the SCD group and 2.96 (4.10) in the control group. However, considering the 2 genotypes separately, a significant difference was seen only in teenagers with SCD HbSC (p < 0.2). The lack of a significant difference in caries experience between American SCD teenagers HbSS and healthy controls was explained, in part, as a large exposure to fluoride through the drinking water, since children with SCD need to pay attention to hydration when preventing pain crisis [6].

In our results, the minor occurrence of dental caries in the children group was attributed to their receipts of major health care surveillance provided via access to free dental treatment at Hemominas - MG, Brazil. The literature shows a great resilience capacity of children`s families with chronic diseases including sickle cell disease [20, 21]. Mothers of children with SCD often leave their jobs to devote themselves to the child's health needs [20, 21]. Many parents incorporate the role of caregiver or manager for the child´s disease in its own sense of life [20, 21]. In this manner, it is suggested that the SCD children`s health care from their parents had influenced the lower caries experience of their children.

We attribute the lack of significant differences in caries experience between SCD teenagers and the control group to the age of adolescents. The behavior of older children may differ from that of younger children. Teenagers can see the supervision of their parents as a threat to their growing desire of independence, resulting in a resistance to the appropriate behaviors to health [21, 22]. This independence of adolescents with SCD would result in less attention to preventative measures such oral hygiene and a healthy diet, making adolescents with SCD as susceptible to dental caries as their control group.

The experience of dental caries among children with SCD and their peers (without SDC) was similar to the experience observed among 160 children with SCD aged 3 to 12 years in Recife, Brazil [12]. Among children in Recife, there was an average DMFT score of 1.5 [12]. This result is close to what we found. However, comparing our results with data from a national survey carried out in Brazil (dmft = 2.43 and DMFT = 2.07) [23], our results reflected better oral health. Comparing the results of this study with those observed in research conducted with Indian SCD children, there was a higher dental caries experience between Indian SCD children aged 3 to 15 years (Hb SS and Beta thalassemia) in comparison with controls [24]. We believe that one reason for the discrepancy in their findings and our results may be due to differences in the oral health care systems between India and Brazil. In the Brazilian context, oral health care for pediatric SCD patients is provided free of charge by the government. In contrast, In India, the development of appropriate models of health for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients presents a challenge that should not be underestimated [25]. In this case, the characteristics of the Brazilian health system could break the link between socioeconomic conditions and health. Another possible explanation is that our controls were selected from the school friends of SCD patients. There is homophily in social networks [2628]. This could have resulted in greater similarity of dmft/DMFT scores between patients and their controls (compared to a truly random control population).

Dental caries is a multi-factor disease and controlling factors can be challenging. In our regression analyses, low family income was shown to be a significant associated factor in younger children. Socioeconomic factors have been previously shown to be a robust predictor of caries risk. Lower income may be associated with lower health literacy (concerning oral hygiene practices) as well as lower access to preventive health care information [29, 30]. Our results agree with previous studies showing that income can be considered a co-factor in the relationship between SCD and oral health [10, 12].

Our study revealed a higher frequency of gingival bleeding in adolescents with SCD when compared to the control group. This result differs from that observed in a study of Brazilians between 16 and 68 years of age [10]. According to that study, SCD does not predispose an individual to periodontal disease [10]. The comparison of these studies requires caution since there is no difference in the age of the participants. In the present study, we believe that the association between SCD and bleeding gums can be attributed to the resistance of the appropriate behaviors to health [21], resulting in inadequate oral hygiene, which is a common risk factor for dental caries and periodontal disease.

There was no difference in OHRQoL among participants with SCD and controls. A similar result was found in SCD teenagers and controls in Ohio (USA) [6]. As described by these authors, the lack of association may be explained by the patient selection bias. The present study only included participants who were not suffering from a painful crisis at the time of the survey, the medical conditions other than SCD, and in emergency dental appointments in the past three months. These facts may have led to the evaluation of only patients in good health, masking the OHRQoL during the acute pain that is a characteristic of SCD.

We would have expected parental education to be a strong predictor of caries. Less educated parents have less health literacy. However, considering the schooling level of the fathers and mothers of all the children in our study, we observed that 76 % of parents had completed up to eight years of study. It is a very homogeneous sample for the low level of education. This could be a reason for not having found a relationship between the prevalence of caries in children and the level of parental education, either in univariate or multivariate analysis. This result agrees with the study of 160 Brazilian children with SCD aged 3–12 years in Recife, Brazil [12]. There was no significant relationship between parental education level and dmft/DMFT index, or any of the variables examined: decayed, missing and filled teeth [12]. Over half of the parents (56.3 %) had not completed their elementary education, 18.1 % had completed elementary school, and 18.1 % had completed high school [12].

In the present study, the disease's clinical severity was associated with dental caries in children suffering from SCD. Disease's clinical severity is associated with vaso-occlusion within the vasculature of the pulpal tissue that may account for the pain experienced by SCD sufferers, and that the same infarction process that afflicts other organs in the body may also affect the dental tissue [31]. Other studies examined histological changes in the dental tissue with regard to SCD and disease's clinical severity. Sickle-shaped cells were observed in the vessels of the pulp of teeth from patients 24 to 96 h after an acute sickle cell crisis attack [32]. The authors concluded that significant pathological changes were observed in the dentin and pulp and suggested that they were most likely due to stasis of the sickle cells in the capillaries, which created a hypoxic situation, causing tissue infarction. The authors stated that the changes observed were not pathognomonic, but that findings suggest that the sickle cell disease's clinical severity has a higher susceptibility to poor oral health [32, 33]. The knowledge of the association between dental caries and the severity of SCD allows dentists to gain a greater understanding of the problem and the role of pediatric dentists in the overall health of children.

The main limitation of this study was that we examined a specific population from one city in southern Brazil. Accordingly, our findings should be interpreted in the light of external generalization. Prospective studies which have larger and more diverse samples involving hospitalized patients, should complement our data and would provide a better understanding of the relationship between the severity of SCD and oral health. Dental radiographs were not obtained; thus, carious lesions that can only be detected radiographically were missed. Moreover consumption of sugar was not assessed. In terms of the strengths of our study, we conducted oral examinations on every subject, and components of the caries burden index (dmft/DMFT) were separated, making it possible to differentiate active disease from treated disease. We included a matched control group consisting of healthy peers. Lastly, the high degree of reproducibility of the diagnoses, as measured by the kappa statistics, contributed to the internal validity of the study.

Conclusion

In conclusion, children with SCD had less experience of dental caries than controls (without SCD). The occurrence of dental caries among teenagers with SCD was similar to their controls. The results reinforce the importance of care related to oral health among children and emphasize the need to implement appropriate preventive measures for these patients taking into account factors that were associated with caries. These measures, in addition to preventing the occurrence of decay, are fundamental to avoid complications in the general health of children with SCD. Therefore, dentists have an important role in preventing health complications in patients with SCD and providing a better quality of life for them.

Abbreviations

SCD: 

Sickle Cell Disease

WHO: 

World Health Organization

PPE: 

Personal Protective Equipment

OHRQoL: 

Oral Health-related Quality of Life

CPQ: 

Child Perceptions Questionnaire

SES: 

Socioeconomic Status

QoL: 

Quality of Life

HbSS: 

Genotype Hemoglobin SS (Homozigoze of hemolobin S)

HbSC: 

Genotype Hemoglobin SC

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study received support from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Lemann Foundation. The authors would like to thank Hemominas.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Federal University of Minas Gerais
(2)
Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences
(3)
Public Health Graduate Program, Vale do Rio dos Sinos University

References

  1. Steinberg MH. Predicting clinical severity in sickle cell anaemia. Br J Haematol. 2005;129:465–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Piel FB, Patil AP, Howes RE, Nyangiri OA, Gething PW, Dewi M, et al. Global epidemiology of sickle cell haemoglobin in neonates: a contemporary geostatistical model-based map and population estimates. Lancet. 2003;381:142–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. McGann PT. Sickle cell anemia: an underappreciated and unaddressed contributor to global childhood mortality. J Pediatr. 2014;165:18–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Manual de Educação em Saúde: auto-cuidado na doença falciforme. Brasíla (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2009 [cited 2014 Sept 12]. Available from: http://www.saude.rs.gov.br/upload/1337789547_Linha_de_CuidadoDF_Manual_MS.pdf
  5. Kelleher M, Bishop K, Briggs P. Oral complications associated with sickle cell anemia: a review and case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;82:225–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ralstrom E, da Fonseca MA, Rhodes M, Amini H. The impact of sickle cell disease on oral health-related quality of life. Pediatr Dent. 2014;36:24–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Laurence B, Reid BC, Katz RV. Sickle cell anemia and dental caries: a literature review and pilot study. Spec Care Dent. 2002;22:70–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Fukuda JT, Sonis AL, Platt OS, Kurth S. Acquisition of mutans streptococci and caries prevalence in pediatric sickle cell anemia patients receiving long-term antibiotic therapy. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27:186–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Taylor LB, Nowak AJ, Giller RH, Casamassimo PS. Sickle cell anemia: a review of the dental concerns and a retrospective study of dental and bony changes. Spec Care Dentist. 1995;15:38–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Passos CP, Santos PR, Aguiar MC, Cangussu MC, Toralles MB, da Silva MC, et al. Sickle cell disease does not predispose to caries or periodontal disease. Spec Care Dent. 2012;32:55–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Soares FF, Rossi TRA, Brito MGS, Vianna MIP, Cangussu MCT. Conditions of oral health and socio-demographic factors in children from 6 to 96 months with sickle cell disease of Bahia. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2010;39:115–21.Google Scholar
  12. Luna AC, Rodrigues MJ, Menezes VA, Marques KM, Santos FA. Caries prevalence and socioeconomic factors in children with sickle cell anemia. Braz Oral Res. 2012;26:43–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. De Matos BM, Ribeiro ZE, Balducci I, Figueiredo MS, Back-Brito GN, Mota AJ, et al. Oral microbial colonization in children with sickle cell anaemia under long-term prophylaxis with penicillin. Arch Oral Biol. 2014;59:1042–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Guzeldemir E, Toygar HU, Boga C, Cilasun U. Dental and periodontal health status of subjects with sickle cell disease. J Dent Sci. 2011;6:227–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawrenz DR. Sickle cell disease: a review and update of current therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:171–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Marcos-Pinto R, Diniz-Ribeiro M, Carneiro F, Machado JC, Figueiredo C, Reis CA, Ferreira J, Areias J. First degree relatives and familial aggregation of gastric cancer: who to choose for control in case–control studies? Familial cancer 11: 137–43. doi:10.1007/s10689-011-9488-0
  17. World Health Organization. Oral Health Surveys: basic methods. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997. [apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/97035/1/9789241548649_eng.pdf]
  18. Martins MT, Ferreira FM, Oliveira AC, Paiva SM, Vale MP, Allison PJ, et al. Preliminary validation of the Brazilian version of the child perceptions questionnaire 8–10. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2009;10:135–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Torres CS, Paiva SM, Vale MP, Pordeus IA, Ramos-Jorge ML, Oliveira AC, et al. Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the child perceptions questionnaire (CPQ11-14) - shortforms. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:43. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-7-43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Gil KM, Williams DA, Thompson Jr RJ, Kinney TR. Sickle cell disease in children and adolescents: the relation of child and parent pain coping strategies to adjustment. J Pediatr Psychol. 1991;16:643–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Casey RL, Brown RT. Psychological aspects of hematologic diseases. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2003;12:567–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Midence K, Fuggle P, Davies SC. Psychosocial aspects of sickle cell disease (SCD) in childhood and adolescence: A review. Br J Clin Psychol. 1993;32:271–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Brasil. Ministerio da saude. Coordenaçāo de saude bucal. Pesquisa Nacional de saude bucal: SB Brasil 2010. Brasilia, DF 2011. Available in: bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/pesquisa_nacional_saude_bucal.pdf.
  24. Singh J, Singh N, Kumar A, Kedia NB, Agarwal A. Dental and periodontal health status of Beta thalassemia major and sickle cell anemic patients: a comparative study. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5:53–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Patel J, Serjeant GR. Newborn screening for sickle cell disease in India: the need for defining optimal clinical care. Indian J Pediatr. 2014;81:229–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Libbey HP. Measuring student relationships to school: attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. J Sch Health. 2004;74:274–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Waters SK, Cross DS, Runions K. Social and ecological structures supporting adolescent connectedness to school: a theoretical model. J Sch Health. 2009;79:516–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pabayo R, Janosz M, Bisset S, Kawachi I. School social fragmentation, economic deprivation and social cohesion and adolescent physical inactivity. PLoS One. 2014;9, e99154.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Meneghim Mde C, Kozlowski FC, Pereira AC, Ambrosano GM, Meneghim ZM. A socioeconomic classification and the discussion related to prevalence of dental caries and dental fluorosis. Cien Saude Colet. 2007;12:523–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Laurence B, George D, Woods D, Shosanya A, Katz RV, Lanzkron S, et al. The association between sickle cell disease and dental caries in African Americans. Spec Care Dentist. 2006;26:95–100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. O'Rourke CA, Hawley GM. Sickle cell disorder and orofacial pain in Jamaican patients. Br Dent J. 1998;185(2):90–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Cox GM, Soni NN. Pathological effects of sickle cell anemia on the pulp. ASDC J Dent Child. 1984;51(2):128–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Andrews CH, England Jr MC, Kemp WB. Sickle cell anemia: an etiological factor in pulpal necrosis. J Endod. 1983;9(6):249–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fernandes et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement