Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinical consequences of untreated dental caries in German 5- and 8-year-olds

  • Katrin Grund1Email author,
  • Inka Goddon2,
  • Ina M. Schüler1,
  • Thomas Lehmann3 and
  • Roswitha Heinrich-Weltzien1
BMC Oral Health201515:140

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0121-8

Received: 14 April 2015

Accepted: 19 October 2015

Published: 4 November 2015

Abstract

Background

About half of all carious lesions in primary teeth of German 6- to 7-year-old children remain untreated, but no data regarding the clinical consequences of untreated dental caries are available. Therefore, this cross-sectional observational study aimed to assess the prevalence and experience of caries and odontogenic infections in the primary dentition of 5- and 8-year-old German children.

Methods

Dental examinations were performed in 5-year-old pre-school children (n = 496) and in 8-year-old primary school children (n = 608) living in the Westphalian Ennepe-Ruhr district. Schools and preschools were selected by sociodemographic criteria including size, area, ownership, socio-economic status. Caries was recorded according to WHO criteria (1997). The Lorenz curves were used to display the polarisation of dental caries. Caries pattern in 5-year-olds was categorized by Wyne’s (1997) definition of early childhood caries (ECC). Odontogenic infections as clinical consequence of untreated dental caries were assessed by the pufa index. The ‘untreated caries-pufa ratio’ was calculated, and the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ) was used for evaluating the correlation between dmft and pufa scores. Categorical data were compared between groups using the chi-square test and continuous data were analysed by t-test.

Results

Caries prevalence and experience in the primary dentition was 26.2 %/0.9 ± 2.0 dmft in 5-year-olds and 48.8 %/2.1 ± 2.8 dmft in 8-year-olds. ECC type I (22 %) was the prevalent caries pattern in 5-year-olds. About 30 % of the tooth decay was treated (5y: 29.7 %/8y: 39.3 %). The Lorenz curves showed a strong caries polarisation on 20 % of the children. Pufa prevalence and experience was 4.4 %/0.1 ± 0.5 pufa in 5-year-olds and 16.6 %/0.3 ± 0.9 pufa in 8-year-olds. In 5-year-olds 14.2 % and in 8-year-olds 34.2 % of the d-component had progressed mainly to the pulp. A significant correlation between dmft and pufa scores exists in both age groups (5y: ρ = 0.399; 8y: ρ = 0.499). First deciduous molars were most frequently affected by odontogenic infections, presenting virtually all pufa scores (>95 %).

Conclusions

Prevalence and experience of odontogenic infections and the untreated caries-pufa ratio were increasing from the younger to the elder children. Dmft and pufa scores in primary teeth predict a higher caries risk in permanent teeth. The pufa index highlights relevant information for decision makers to develop effective oral health care programs for children at high risk for caries.

Keywords

Children Odontogenic infections Primary dentition pufa index Untreated dental caries

Background

Dental caries continues to be one of the most widespread diseases in the world [1]. In particular, children are predisposed to the development of carious lesions, and their treatment is not just a problem in low- and middle-income countries [2, 3]. Even in economically developed countries such as the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the United States, the treatment of decayed primary teeth remains an on-going public health challenge [47].

Severely decayed teeth have an important impact on children’s general health, nutrition, growth and body weight [810] by causing discomfort, pain, sleeping problems, learning disorders and absence from school [1113]. Furthermore, odontogenic infections as a consequence of untreated dental caries are the most frequent reason for the hospitalisation of young children [6, 14]. Therefore, oral health fundamentally influences children’s general health and quality of life [1517].

The early onset of dental caries is of exceptional concern since it represents an indicator for missed opportunities for preventive care and endangers the general health of a child. Wyne classified dental caries in children aged younger than 6 years as early childhood caries (ECC) by three types of severity [18]. Type I has been defined as the existence of isolated carious lesion(s) on molars and/or incisors, type II as labiolingual carious lesions on maxillary incisors and type III as carious lesions on almost all teeth, including lower incisors [18]. The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) defines ECC as the presence of one or more decayed (non-cavitated or cavitated lesions), missing (due to caries), or filled tooth surfaces in any primary tooth in a child under the age of six [19].

Most epidemiological studies performed in children have used the dmft index, which provides information on the caries experience and restorative and surgical treatment, but fails to contribute data on the consequences of untreated caries. The diagnosis ‘teeth indicated for extraction’ is a WHO criterion for treatment needs [20], but does not give detailed information about the severity of advanced caries lesions and is rarely used in the literature.

In 2010, Monse et al. [21] introduced a new clinical index characterising the consequences of untreated dental caries in primary and permanent teeth: the pufa/PUFA index. It is calculated as sum of teeth with four diagnoses concerning different kinds of odontogenic infections ([p] pulpal involvement, [u] ulceration, [f] fistula, [a] abscess). Thus, the pufa index complements the dmft index by displaying the severity of dental decay and quantifying odontogenic infections of the pulp and surrounding tissues due to untreated caries.

Recently, the pufa index was used particularly in low- and middle-income countries to display the severity of oral health neglect (Table 1). The pufa prevalence varies from 24 % in Brazilian 6- to 7-year-olds [22] up to 85 % in 6-year-old children from the Philippines [21], indicating a huge dental need. Although Germany is a high-income country, the treatment of dental decay in the primary dentition of pre-school children is insufficient. The last representative study amongst 6- to 7-year-old German children revealed that almost half of all carious primary teeth (47.4 %) are untreated [7]. This situation has been nearly unchanged for more than 10 years [23]. Until now, the consequences of untreated dental caries—odontogenic infections—had not been quantified in German children with the pufa index. Therefore, the aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the prevalence and experience of caries and odontogenic infections in primary teeth of 5- and 8-year-old German children from the Westphalian Ennepe-Ruhr District (EN District). The null hypotheses tested were as follows: 1) there is no difference in the prevalence and experience of odontogenic infections between 5- and 8-year-old German children; 2) untreated dental caries does not correlate with odontogenic infections; 3) odontogenic infections in 8-year-olds do not correlate with caries experience in permanent teeth.
Table 1

Pufa prevalence and mean pufa index in the primary dentition of children—overview from the literature

Authors

Year of publication/ investigation

Population N/ country

Age of Population

dmft prevalence (%)

dmft (mean ± SD)

pufa prevalence (%)

pufa (mean ± SD)

Mehta A., Bhalla S.

2014/2014

N = 603/ Indian

5–6 years

69.5

not reported

38.6

0.9 ± 1.93 pufa

0.84 ± 1.5 p

0.001 ± 0.05 u

0.01 ± 0.08 f

0.5 ± 0.3 a

Baginska J., et al.

2013/2011

N = 215/ Poland

5 years

85.9

5.56 ± 4.45 dmft

43.0

2.20 ± 3.43 pufa

4.90 ± 4.26 dt

2.13 ± 3.35 p

0.19 ± 0.83 mt

0.00 u

0.46 ± 1.16 ft

0.07 ± 0.33 f

0.00 a

7 years

94.8

6.69 ± 3.14 dmft

72.0

2.44 ± 2.22 pufa

5.22 ± 3.25 dt

2.31 ± 2.14 p

0.86 ± 1.33 mt

0.01 ± 0.09 u

0.61 ± 1.24 ft

0.12 ± 0.35 f

0.00 a

Thekiso, M., et al.

2012/2010

N = 800/South Africa

4–5 years

49

:2.4 dmft

33.0

2.9 ± 2.4 pufa

2.0 dt

1.8 ± 1.9 p

0.2 mt

0.7 ± 0.4 u

0.2 ft

0.0 f

0.4 ± 0.1 a

6–8 years

46

2.4 dmft

41.0

3.4 ± 3.9 pufa

2.0 dt

2.9 ± 2.6 p

0.3 mt

0.3 ± 0.6 u

0.1 ft

0.1 ± 0.4 f

0.1 ± 0.3 a

Figueiredo M.J., et al.

2011/2009

N = 835/ Brazil

6–7 years

not reported

not reported

23.7

0.4 ± 0.9 pufa

0.3 ± 0.7 p

0.001 ± 0.03 u

0.08 ± 0.3 f

0.01 ± 0.1 a

Monse B., et al.

2012/2006

N = 2030/ Philippines

6 years

96.8

8.4 ± 4.2 dmft

85.0

3.4 ± 2.6 pufa

8.0 dt

2.9 ± 2.4 p

0.4 mt

0.3 ± 1.0 u

0.0 ft

0.1 ± 0.4 f

0.1 ± 0.3 a

Methods

Study population

Data from oral examinations provided by public health service between January and December 2011 to 1.104 children aged five (n = 496) and eight (n = 608) years living in the EN District in Germany were included in this cross-sectional epidemiological study. By the law, free dental screenings to all children and adolescents attending preschools and schools are annually offered by the Department of Social Services and Health, Health Services for Children and Adolescents of the EN District. The age group of 5-year-olds was chosen because of a good comparability to international studies regarding the pufa index (Table 1) and the possibility to evaluate ECC. The attendance of pre-schools for 5-year-olds is highly recommended by the German Department of Education. Therefore, the large majority of 5-year-olds is visiting pre-schools, enabling the examination of a representative sample of children. Furthermore, 5-year-olds display the highest stage of the complete developed primary dentition before the first permanent teeth are erupting.

At the age of eight, children reveal the end of the second phase of the mixed dentition—before exfoliation of the primary molars—and the first permanent molars are commonly erupted and exposed to the oral environment since 2 years. Therefore, examination of 8-year-olds enables to show the influence of caries experience in the primary dentition on dental health of the permanent dentition; particularly the first permanent molar.

The EN District is located in the centre of the federal state North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) in Western Germany. NRW experienced high industrialisation and urbanisation in the early 20th century, becoming the largest conurbation and centre of coal industry in Europe. Because of the coal-crisis in the years following 1960, the socio-economic status declined. In 2011 NRW had an at-risk-of-poverty rate of 14.6 % which is comparable to Germany (15 %) [24]. The report of poverty for the EN District in 2010 states that this district is representative for NRW showing a slightly higher at-risk-of-poverty rate (16 %) [25].

The sample size was estimated to the number of children necessary to obtain statistical significance with 80 % power and an interval of 5. Targeting the estimated sample size and following the regional socio-demographic pattern, 21.0 % (34 out of 162) pre-schools and 38.2 % (21 out of 55), primary schools were selected from the different areas. Selection criteria of the schools/pre-schools included area (urban/rural and industrialized/middle-class), size (small and large), ownership (public/private) and socio-economic status targeting a proportional distribution.

The exclusion criteria for the cross-sectional study were: 1) absenteeism from school/pre-school 2) child has a special health care need and 3) refusal of the child to be examined in the pre-school setting. Eighty per cent (495 out of 620) of all 5-year-olds attending the selected pre-schools and 88.9 % (608 out of 684) of all 8-year-olds attending the selected primary schools could be included in this study.

Examiner calibration

Prior to the survey, the examiner (I. G.) received 1-day theoretical and clinical calibration training for using the dmft and pufa indices. An experienced dentist and epidemiologist (R. H.-W.) conducted the training. Ten children were examined in a pre-school and a primary school not included in this survey, but under the same field conditions as in the main study. The intra- and inter-examiner-reproducibility was assessed by the kappa (κ) statistics. The κ values for inter-examiner-reproducibility ranged from 0.90 (I. G.) to 0.92 (R. H-W.) for the pufa index, demonstrating excellent agreement, and values for inter-examiner reproducibility for the dmft was in the same range (0.88 I. G/0.93 R. H-W.). Intra-examiner reproducibility ranged from 0.89 to 1.00 for the examiner (I. G.) for both indices. Within the main study, every 20th child was repeatedly examined. The intra-examiner reproducibility for both indices ranged between 0.91 and 1.00.

Oral examinations

The examinations were performed by one calibrated dentist in classrooms in each pre-school or primary school (I. G.). The caries status of the children was assessed according to WHO criteria [20] using an intra-oral mouth mirror, a CPI ball-end probe, and a halogen examination light (Mach 113, Dr. Mach GmbH & Co. KG, Ebersberg, Germany) after tooth-brushing supervised by the dental nurse or teacher. Cotton rolls were used for moisture control. Caries was assessed using the dmft index and the dmft/DMFT in 8-year olds.

The clinical consequences of untreated caries were recorded by using the pufa index [21]. The pufa index per child represents the number of teeth meeting the following diagnostic criteria: Decayed teeth with visible pulpal involvement (p) was measured when the open pulp chamber was visible or the clinical crown was destroyed and only root fragments were left. Ulceration (u) of the soft tissue surrounding the tooth was scored when caused by dislocated tooth fragments. Fistula (f) was diagnosed when pus-releasing sinus tract was related to the tooth with pulpal involvement. Abscess (a) was scored when a pus-containing swelling was related to the tooth. The diagnosis of the pufa index was performed visually, without the use of a dental probe.

Statistical analysis

Data collection was performed with excel spreadsheets (Excel 2011 Microsoft Cooperation, Redmond, WA, USA) and the statistical analysis of the oral health data was carried out using SPSS 21.0. (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA), R 3.1.1 (R Core Team, 2014 [26]). Caries experience was calculated as mean dmft and the Significant Caries Index (SiC index) as the mean dmft of one third of the population with the highest caries scores [27]. ECC in 5-year-olds was assessed according to the definition of Wyne differentiating between mild (type I), moderate (type II) and severe caries pattern (type III) [18]. The Lorenz curve was used to display the polarisation of dental caries (cumulative disease), and the extent of inequality was measured by the Gini coefficient (G) with finite population correction. The range of the Gini coefficient is 0 ≤ G ≤ 1, with value 0 indicating equality and value 1 expressing maximal inequality. The care index was calculated as [ft/dmft] × 100. The severity of untreated dental caries was recorded by the pufa index. The ‘untreated caries-pufa ratio’ was calculated as [pufa/dt] × 100 and describes the percentage of untreated carious teeth that developed an oral infection. The correlation between dmft and pufa scores was computed by the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). Categorical data were compared between groups using the chi-square test and continuous data were analysed by t-test. A binary logistic regression model was fitted to determine the influence of dmft and pufa on the risk of developing dental caries in the permanent dentition. Statistical significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Ethical considerations

This study was performed in full accordance with ethical principles and approved by the ethics committee of the Jena University Hospital (registration number 3660-D1/13).

Results

5-year-old children

Four hundred and six 5-year-olds (249 boys) with an average of 19.4 primary and 0.7 permanent teeth were included in the analysis. Caries prevalence was 26.2 % and caries experience was 0.9 ± 2.0 dmft (Table 2). The SiC index amounted to 2.8 dmft. ECC was distributed to 22 % on ECC type I, 4 % on type II and 0.2 % on type III. Caries polarisation is displayed by the Lorenz curve in Fig. 1 and confirmed by the high Gini coefficient (G = 0.84). The care index was 29.7 %, indicating that less than one-third of the dental decay was treated. The prevalence of odontogenic infections was 4.4 % and exclusively concentrated on pulpal involvement (p) with a mean pufa of 0.1 ± 0.5 (Table 2). Boys had a higher pufa (0.1 ± 0.7) than girls did (0.0 ± 0.2, p = 0.035) and also had a higher untreated caries-pufa-ratio (boys = 20.4 %, girls = 6.1 %, p = 0.030). First primary molars were affected most frequently by odontogenic infections (Fig. 2). Nearly all dental decay (93.6 %) and odontogenic infections (89.2 %) were concentrated in 20 % of the children, showing a significant correlation between high dmft and pufa scores (ρ = 0.399, p < 0.001).
Table 2

Prevalence and experience of dental caries and odontogenic infections in the primary dentition

  

5-year-olds

   

8-year-olds

  
 

Total

Boys

,.Girls

p-value

Total

Boys

Girls

p-value

Number

496

249

247

 

608

298

310

 

Caries prevalence (%) [95 % CI]

26.2 [22.5–30.3]

26.1 [21–31.9]

26.3 [21.2–32.1]

1.000

48.8 [44.9–52.8]

51.5 [45.7–57.0]

46.1 [40.7–51.7]

0.194

dmft x ± SD

0.9 ± 2.0

1.0 ± 2.2

0.8 ± 1.8

0.255

2.1 ± 2.8

2.3 ± 2.9

1.8 ± 2.6

0.032*

dt x ± SD

0.5 ± 1.4

0.6 ± 1.6

0.5 ± 1.2

0.316

0.9 ± 1.7

1.1 ± 1.8

0.8 ± 1.6

0.074

mt x ± SD

0.1 ± 1.8

0.2 ± 1.1

0.0 ± 0.3

0.052

0.3 ± 1.0

0.4 ± 1.1

0.3 ± 1.0

0.189

ft x ± SD

0.3 ± 1.0

0.2 ± 0.8

0.3 ± 1.1

0.464

0.8 ± 1.6

0.9 ± 1.7

0.8 ± 1.5

0.348

SiC x ± SD

2.8 ± 2.7

3.1 ± 3.0

2.5 ± 2.3

0.256

5.6 ± 1.9

6.1 ± 1.9

5.0 ± 2.0

0.056

Care index (%) [95 % CI]

29.7 [25.7–34]

23.6 [18.8–29.2]

37.3 [30.9–44.2]

0.338

39.3 [36.6–42]

37.9 [34.3–41.6]

41.1 [37.1–45.2]

0.302

pufa prevalence (%) [95 % CI]

4.4 [2.9–6.6]

6.0 [3.7–9.7]

2.8 [1.4–5.7]

0.125

16.6 [13.9–19.8]

21.2 [16.9–26.1]

11.9 [8.8–16.0]

0.002+

pufa x ± SD

0.1 ± 0.5

0.1 ± 0.7

0.0 ± 0.2

0.035*

0.3 ± 0.9

0.4 ± 1.0

0.2 ± 0.8

0.008*

p x ± SD

0.1 ± 0.5

0.1 ± 0.7

0.0 ± 0.2

0.035*

0.3 ± 0.9

0.4 ± 1.0

0.2 ± 0.8

0.016*

u x ± SD

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

-

0.0 ± 0.1

0.0 ± 0.2

0.0 ± 0.0

0.021*

f x ± SD

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

-

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

-

a x ± SD

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

-

0.0 ± 0.1

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.1

0.158

Untreated caries pufa ratio (%) [95 % CI]

14.2 [10.5–18.9]

20.4 [14.7–27.6]

6.1 [3.0–12.1]

0.030*

34.2 [30.4–34.2]

39.3 [34.0–44.8]

27.6 [22.4–33.4]

0.003*

p-value statistically significant (+chi-square test, *t-test)

Fig. 1

Lorenz curve for the dmft distribution of 5-year-old German children

Fig. 2

Tooth related distribution of the single pufa components in German 5-year-olds

8-year-old children

Six hundred eight 8-year-olds (298 boys) with 11.3 permanent and 11.7 primary teeth were examined. Caries prevalence was 48.8 % in the primary (Table 2) and 3.9 % in the permanent teeth. The caries experience of the primary teeth was 0.9 ± 2.0 dmft and of the permanent teeth 0.1 ± 0.4 DMFT. The SiC index amounted to 5.6 ± 1.9 dmft and 0.2 ± 0.7 DMFT, respectively. Caries polarisation shown by the Lorenz curve revealed that 66 % of the total caries experience was concentrated on 20 % of the children (Fig. 3). The Gini coefficient was 0.67, showing a lower concentration than in the population of the 5-year-olds. The care index of the primary teeth was 39.3 % with no significant difference between boys and girls.
Fig. 3

Lorenz curve for the dmft distribution of 8-year-old German children

Pufa prevalence amounted to 16.6 % and the mean pufa was 0.1 ± 0.5 (Table 2). Pulpal involvement (p) was scored most frequently (94.8 %). The untreated caries-pufa-ratio indicates that 34.2 % of the d-component had progressed mainly to the pulp, indicating a significant correlation between dmft and pufa scores (ρ = 0.499, p < 0.001). The prevalence of caries experience and odontogenic infections was significantly higher in boys. Almost 40 % of untreated caries in boys revealed a pufa index >0. Figure 4 presents the tooth related distribution of single pufa components in 8-year-olds. Virtually all pufa scores (96.9 %) were concentrated on primary molars with pulp involvement and the ulceration of soft tissues. The first primary molars were the most affected teeth. Twenty-four (3.9 %) of all examined 8-year-olds revealed caries experience in permanent teeth (DMFT > 0). Of these children, 41.7 % also showed a pufa score in the primary dentition (Table 3). Caries experience in the permanent dentition was significantly determined by dmft index and the dt and mt component as well as by pufa index and the p component (t-test). For each unit increase in dmft and pufa the risk of caries experience in the permanent dentition increased by 33.9 % (OR 1.339, p = 0.00) and 34.9 % (OR 1.349, p = 0.03) (Table 4).
Fig. 4

Tooth related distribution of the single pufa components in German 8-year-olds

Table 3

Dental caries and odontogenic infections in the primary dentition of 8-year-olds with and without caries experience in the permanent dentition

8-year-olds

    
 

Total

DMFT = 0

DMFT > 0

p-value

Number

608

584

24

 

Caries prevalence (%) [95 % CI]

48.8 [44.9–52.8]

47.3 [43.2–51.3]

87.5 [69.0–95.7]

<0.001+

dmft x ± SD

2.1 ± 2.8

1.9 ± 2.7

5.5 ± 3.1

<0.001*

dt x ± SD

0.9 ± 1.7

0.8 ± 1.6

2.9 ± 3.3

0.006*

mt x ± SD

0.3 ± 1.0

0.3 ± 1.0

1.3 ± 1.4

0.003*

ft x ± SD

0.8 ± 1.6

0.8 ± 1.6

1.4 ± 2.0

0.172

pufa prevalence (%) [95 % CI]

16.6 [13.9–19.8]

15.6 [12.9–18.7]

41.7 [24.5–61.2]

0.003+

pufa x ± SD

0.3 ± 0.9

0.3 ± 0.8

1.5 ± 2.4

0.015*

p x ± SD

0.3 ± 0.9

0.3 ± 0.7

1.5 ± 2.4

0.021*

u x ± SD

0.0 ± 0.1

0.0 ± 0.1

0.1 ± 0.4

0.390

f x ± SD

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

-

a x ± SD

0.0 ± 0.1

0.0 ± 0.1

0.0 ± 0.0

0.774

p-value statistically significant (*t-test, +Fisher’s exact test)

Table 4

Dental caries and odontogenic infections in the primary dentition of 8-year-olds as risk factors for dental caries in permanent teeth

 

Regression Coefficient

p-value

OR

95 % CI

dmft

0.292

<0.001*

1.339

1.151–1.557

pufa

0.299

0.030*

1.349

1.025–1.775

p-value statistically significant (*binary logistic regression analysis)

Discussion

In recent years, epidemiological caries research in high-income countries like Germany focussed on the development of more sensitive diagnostic methods to enable the assessment of initial caries lesions like the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) [28, 29]. This trend results from the decline of cavitated caries lesions and the development of non-invasive and preventive interventions requiring a distinction between different stages of initial caries lesions. In contrast, the remaining decay is concentrated in a small group of children with high caries levels and a huge need for treatment [27]. Epidemiological studies have indicated that socio-economic conditions are important risk factors for caries during childhood [30, 31]. Thus, high caries prevalence and experience in low-income countries [32] and in socio-economically disadvantaged groups [33, 34] have been documented. That polarisation phenomenon is also present in German children [3537]. Our findings display the inequality of caries distribution by the Lorenz curve (Fig. 1), confirmed by the Gini coefficient. In 5-year-olds, 90 % of the whole caries burden was concentrated in 20 % of the children, showing a strong polarisation of ECC. Unfortunately, no data on the children’s ethnical or socio-economic background were collected in the examination, which is a limitation of this survey.

Untreated caries may affect seriously the quality of children’s life because of pain and discomfort, which could lead to acute and chronic infections, oral mucosal conditions and altered eating and sleeping habits [38, 39]. Furthermore, untreated caries in primary teeth can have a lasting detrimental impact on the permanent dentition by causing high caries risk [40] or developmental defects of the permanent successor tooth [41]. This was demonstrated in the present study population by the fact that 41.7 % of 8-year-olds with dental decay in the permanent dentition (DMFT > 0) also presented pufa scores in the primary dentition (pufa > 0). With this fact the third null hypothesis that there is no correlation of odontogenic infections and caries in the permanent dentition of 8-year-olds was rejected (Table 3). Thus, children with pufa scores should be characterized to be at high caries risk for early caries onset in permanent teeth. Presenting only dmft data to decision makers leaves them unaware of the severity and associated consequences of untreated caries on general and dental health [10, 42]. Therefore, for the first time, our study gathered data on odontogenic infections as consequences of untreated dental caries in 5- and 8-year-old German children by using the pufa index.

About one-third to one-half of Westphalian 5- to 8-year-olds suffered from caries in primary teeth, which is in the same range (47.3 %) estimated for 6- to 7-year-olds in the last representative epidemiological German study in 2009 [7]. About one third of all decay was restored (5y: 29.7 %; 8y: 39.3 %), leaving the teeth to development of pulpal involvement and odontogenic infections. This reflects the fact, that many German dentists perceive dental treatment of children as stressful [43]. Commonly, dental school graduates are insufficiently qualified because of the limited university education in paediatric dentistry. Furthermore, for most dentists, it is not attractive to attend a postgraduate paediatric curriculum, due to inadequate reimbursement for restorative treatment in small and pre-school children with limited or lacking capability to cooperate [43]. But the risk of young children experiencing pain and sepsis increases with higher caries experience [4]. Therefore, children at high caries risk would benefit most from early dental care. On average, every twentieth 5-year-old child (4.4 %) and every sixth 8-year-old child (16.6 %) had odontogenic infections. Thus, the first the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the prevalence and experience of odontogenic infections between 5- and 8-year-old German children was rejected. In 5-year-olds, nearly all odontogenic infections (89 %) were concentrated in 20 % of the children displaying the highest dmft scores. This is emphasised by the correlation of untreated dental caries and odontogenic infections (ρ = 0.399, p < 0.001). Hence, the second null hypothesis that untreated dental caries does not correlate with odontogenic infections was rejected.

Taking into account the different socio-economic background of the population examined, comparisons with other countries may be limited. The pufa prevalence of our population was considerably low (5y: 4.4 %, 8y: 16.6 %) compared to Filipino 6-year-olds (85 %) [21], Brazilian 6- to 7-year-olds (23.7 %) [22], South African 4- to 5-year-olds (33 %) and 6- to 8-year-olds (41 %) [44], Polish 5-year- (43 %) and 7-year-olds (72 %) [45], and Indian 5- to 6-year-olds (38.6 %) [46]. Solely, the pufa prevalence in 8-year-old German boys (21.2 %) was in the same range as reported for Brazilian children [22] since 40 % of the caries lesions had progressed to the pulp. Knowing the impact of severe consequences of untreated dental caries on children’s general health, these findings should lead to the development of programs for German children at high caries risk.

Consistent with the studies mentioned, pulp involvement (p) was the diagnosis most frequently recorded, followed by ulceration (u) especially in 8-year-olds. This is in contrast to the findings of Figueiredo et al. [22] and Baginska et al. [45], revealing different patterns of odontogenic infections in different countries. The fact that primary molars were the teeth most affected by pulp involvement is consistent with their high caries susceptibility [4547]. Possible causes for children showing more odontogenic infections in first primary molars are their earlier eruption compared to the seconds which leads to a longer oral cariogenic exposure and the potential of lesions development between eruption and examination time. Furthermore the faster lesion progression from enamel surface to the dental pulp due to the lower enamel-dentin-thickness is related to larger pulp chambers compared to second primary and permanent molars [48, 49]. Additionally, the early age of the child at eruption of first primary molars as well as their posterior position at the dental arches may contribute to more difficult and less efficient tooth brushing by parents or care givers. However, there is no consistent evidence that the first primary molars are more often carious affected [46, 50] than the second primary molars [51-54].

Frigueiro et al. [22] and Murthy et al. [55] suggest that the codes ‘f’ and ‘a’ of the pufa index could be grouped together since they refer to the same inflammatory process of the jaw bone and are only different stages of inflammation. Furthermore, the necessity to score these codes separately was questioned, as the treatment requested will be the same: endodontic treatment or extraction [56, 57]. In this context, it should be considered that the pufa index was not designed to serve as a treatment need index, but rather as an index to quantify the severity of untreated dental caries and to assess the presence of odontogenic infections [58].

The use of only the dmft/DMFT index may be misleading the interpretation of caries epidemiological data. That was shown by the national oral health survey of the Philippines [21] reporting 2.9 DMFT in 12-year-olds, which fulfils the WHO/ FDI goal of 3 DMFT for this age group in 2000 [59]. However, in reality, 41 % of the decay component had progressed to odontogenic infections assessed by the PUFA index, indicating the huge severity of untreated tooth decay. The dmft/DMFT index fails to provide information on the clinical consequences of untreated dental caries, which may be more serious than the caries lesions themselves. The more meticulous caries classification system, ICDAS II enables the recording of different caries progression stages from sound to extensive decay compared to the dmft/DMFT [26]. However, scoring of odontogenic infections (pufa/PUFA index) is only optionally recommended. Until now, German public oral health services prefer using dmft/DMFT index, considering ICDAS II too complicated and time consuming. The new caries assessment spectrum and treatment (CAST)-index was developed combining elements of the ICDAS II and the pufa/PUFA index with the m- and f-components of the dmft/DMFT index [60]. It covers the total spectrum of carious lesion progression, including the advanced stages of carious lesion progression in the pulpal and tooth surrounding tissue. De Souza et al. compared the assessment of dental caries using the CAST instrument and the DMFT index showing no difference between the recorded caries prevalence, caries experience and time spent for examination [61]. Still there is a need to validate the CAST index more closely before trying to replace any other index.

Dental caries is a multifactorial chronic disease with the interplay of individual, cultural, social and socio-economic risk factors. The lack of data regarding these factors is a limitation of the present cross-sectional study. Nevertheless, using the pufa index provides a more comprehensive view on caries pattern in primary teeth of German children. However, there is a lack of other studies performed in high-income countries to compare the findings.

Conclusion

This is the first German survey showing prevalence and experience of odontogenic infections as consequences of severe untreated dental caries in primary teeth among German 5- and 8-year-olds by using the pufa index. Prevalence and experience of odontogenic infections and the untreated caries-pufa ratio were increasing from the younger to the elder children. Pufa scores in primary teeth predict a higher caries risk in permanent teeth. The pufa index highlights relevant information by assessing the severity of untreated dental caries for dentists and decision makers to develop effective oral health care programs for children at high caries risk.

Abbreviations

AAPD: 

American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry

CAST: 

Caries assessment spectrum and treatment

CPI: 

Community Periodontal Index

DMFT: 

Decayed, missing, filled tooth

ECC: 

Early childhood caries

EN: 

Ennepe-Ruhr

FDI: 

World dental federation

ICDAS II: 

International Caries Detection and Assessment System

NRW: 

North Rhine-Westfalia

PUFA: 

Pulpal involvement, ulceration, fistula, abscess

SiC: 

Significant caries

WHO: 

World Health Organisation

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support of the headmaster and teachers of all selected pre- and primary schools during the clinical examination of the children.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, Jena University Hospital
(2)
Department of Social Services and Health, Health Services for Children and Adolescents Schwelm
(3)
Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Jena University Hospital

References

  1. Petersen PE. Global policy for improvement of oral health in the 21st century-implications to oral health research of World Health Assembly 2007, World Health Organization. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009;37(1):1–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Mobarak EH, Shabayek MM, Mulder J, Reda AH, Frencken JE. Caries experience of Egyptian adolescents: does the atraumatic restorative treatment approach offer a solution? Med Princ Pract. 2011;20(6):545–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajayi YO, Sofola OO. Descriptors of permanent teeth with cariously exposed pulp in patients presenting at a Nigerian hospital. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71(5):1348–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Pine CM, Harris RV, Burnside G, Merrett MC. An investigation of the relationship between untreated decayed teeth and dental sepsis in 5-year-old children. Br Dent J. 2006;200(1):45–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Tubert-Jeannin S, Leger S, Manevy R. Addressing children’s oral health inequalities: caries experience before and after the implementation of an oral health promotion program. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012;70(3):255–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Nalliah RP, Allareddy V, Elangovan S, Karimbux N, Allareddy V. Hospital based emergency department visits attributed to dental caries in the United States in 2006. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2010;10(4):212–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Pieper K. Representative epidemiological study about Group Prophylactic Program in 2009. In: German working committee for youth oral health care-Survey. 2009. http://www.daj.de/fileadmin/user_upload/PDF_Downloads/Studie_Korrektur.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2014.Google Scholar
  8. Heinrich-Weltzien R, Monse B, Benzian H, Heinrich J, Kromeyer-Hauschild K. Association of dental caries and weight status in 6- to 7-year-old Filipino children. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(6):1515–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Duijster D, Sheiham A, Hobdell MH, Itchon G, Monse B. Associations between oral health-related impacts and rate of weight gain after extraction of pulpally involved teeth in underweight preschool Filipino children. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:533.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Benzian H, Monse B, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Hobdell M, Mulder J, van Palenstein Helderman W. Untreated severe dental decay: a neglected determinant of low Body Mass Index in 12-year-old Filipino children. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:558.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Leal SC, Bronkhorst EM, Fan M, Frencken JE. Untreated cavitated dentine lesions: impact on children’s quality of life. Caries Res. 2012;46(2):102–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Seirawan H, Faust S, Mulligan R. The impact of oral health on the academic performance of disadvantaged children. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(9):1729–34.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Agaku IT, Olutola BG, Adisa AO, Obadan EM, Vardavas CI. Association between unmet dental needs and school absenteeism because of illness or injury among U.S. school children and adolescents aged 6-17years, 2011–2012. Prev Med. 2015;72:83–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Naidu RS, Boodoo D, Percival T, Newton JT. Dental emergencies presenting to a university-based paediatric dentistry clinic in the West Indies. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15(3):177–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Moura-Leite FR, Ramos-Jorge J, Ramos-Jorge ML, Paiva SM, Vale MP, Pordeus IA. Impact of dental pain on daily living of five-year-old Brazilian preschool children: prevalence and associated factors. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011;12(5):245–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Felitosa S, Colares V, Pinkham J. The psychosocial effects of severe caries in 4-year-old children in Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2005;21(5):1550–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Ramos-Jorge J, Pordeus IA, Ramos-Jorge ML, Marques LS, Paiva SM. Impact of untreated dental caries on quality of life of preschool children: different stages and activity. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12086.
  18. Wyne AH. Early childhood caries: nomenclature and case definition. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999;27:313–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. American Academy of peadiatric dentistry. Policy on Early Childhood Caries (ECC): Classifications, Consequences, and Preventive Strategies. http://www.aapd.org/media/Policies_Guidelines/P_ECCClassifications.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2015.
  20. World Health Organisation. Oral health surveys: basic methods. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1997.Google Scholar
  21. Monse B, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Benzian H, Holmgren C, van Palenstein Helderman W. PUFA-an index of clinical consequences of untreated dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010;38(1):77–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Figueiredo MJ, de Amorim RG, Leal SC, Mulder J, Frencken JE. Prevalence and severity of clinical consequences of untreated dentine carious lesions in children from a deprived area of Brazil. Caries Res. 2011;45(5):435–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Pieper K. Representative epidemiological study about Group Prophylactic Program in 2004. In: German working committee for youth oral health care-Survey. 2004. http://www.daj.de/fileadmin/user_upload/PDF_Downloads/Epidomologische_Begelutuntersuchung_2004.pdf. Accessed 17 Sep 2014.Google Scholar
  24. Federal Statistical Office and the statistical offices of the Länder. At-risk-of-poverty rate according to soziodemographic characteristics. 2011. http://www.amtliche-sozialberichterstattung.de/A1armutsgefaehrdungsquoten.html. Accessed 04 Aug 2015.Google Scholar
  25. Boschek HJ, Kubitza M, Kügler KJ. Report on poverty 2010 of the Ennepe-Ruhr-Kreis. District Administration of the Ennepe-Ruhr-Kreis. 2010.Google Scholar
  26. The R Core Team : A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 5 Mar 2015.
  27. Bratthall D. Introducing the significant caries index together with a proposal for a new global oral health goal for 12-year-olds. Int Dent J. 2000;50:378–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ismail A, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00347x.
  29. Ari T, Ari N. The performance of ICDAS-II using low-powered magnification with light-emitting diode headlight and alternating current impedance spectroscopy device for detection of occlusal caries on primary molars. ISRN Dent. 2013;2013:276070. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/276070.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Christensen LB, Twetman S, Sundby A. Oral health in children and adolescents with different socio-cultural and socio-economic backgrounds. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010;68(1):34–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Psoter WJ, Pendrys DG, Morse DE, Zhang H, Mayne ST. Associations of ethnicity/race and socioeconomic status with early childhood caries patterns. J Public Health Dent. 2006;66(1):23–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Prakash P, Subramaniam P, Durgesh BH, Konde S. Prevalence of early childhood caries and associated risk factors in preschool children of urban Bangalore, India: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Dent. 2012;6:114–52.Google Scholar
  33. Tomar SL, Reeves AF. Changes in the oral health of US children and adolescents and dental public health infrastructure since the release of the healthy people 2010 objectives. Acad Pediatr. 2009;9(6):388–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Stecksen-Blicks C, Hasslof P, Kieri C, Widman K. Caries and background factors in Swedish 4-year-old children with special reference to immigrant status. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72(8):852–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Schneider S, Jerusalem M, Mente J, De Bock F. Sweets consumption of preschool children-extent, context, and consumption patterns. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(5):1301–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Kühnisch J, Senkel H, Heinrich-Weltzien R. Comparative study on the dental health of German and immigrant 8- to 10-years olds in the Westphalian Ennepe-Ruhr district. Gesundheitswesen. 2003;65(2):96–1001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Bissar AR, Oikonomou C, Koch MJ, Schulte AG. Dental health, received care, and treatment needs in 11- to 13-year-old children with immigrant background in Heidelberg, Germany. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007;17(5):364–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Vieira-Andrade RG, Martins-Junior PA, Correa-Faria P, Stella PE, Marinho SA, Marques LS, et al. Oral mucosal conditions in preschool children of low socioeconomic status: prevalence and determinant factors. Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172(5):675–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Praveen BH, Prathibha B, Reddy PP, Monica M, Samba A, Rajesh R. Co relation between PUFA index and oral health related quality of life of a rural population in India: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/11427.5489.
  40. Skeie M, Raadal M, Strand G, Espelid I. The relationship between caries in the primary dentition at 5 years of age and permanent dentition at 10 years of age – a longitudinal study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006;16:152–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Broadbent JM, Thomson WM, Williams SM. Does caries in primary teeth predict enamel defects in permanent teeth? A longitudinal study. J Dent Res. 2005;84(3):260–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang F, Zhang Y, Yuan X, Yu J, Chen S, Chen Z, et al. Caries experience and its association with weight status among 8-year-old children in Qingdao, China. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5(1):52–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Splieth CH, Bunger B, Pine C. Barriers for dental treatment of primary teeth in East and West Germany. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009;19(2):84–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Thekiso M, Yengopal V, Rudolph MJ, Bhayat A. Caries status among children in the West Rand District of Gauteng Province, South Africa. SADJ. 2012;67/7:318–20.Google Scholar
  45. Baginska J, Rodakowska E, Wilczynska-Borawska M, Jamiolkowski J. Index of clinical consequences of untreated dental caries (pufa) in primary dentition of children from north-east Poland. Adv Med Sci. 2013;58(2):442–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Mehta A, Bhalla S. Assessing consequences of untreated carious lesions using pufa index among 5–6 years old school children in an urban Indian population. Indian J Dent Res. 2014;25(2):150–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Vanobbergen J, Lesaffre E, Garcia-Zattera MJ, Jara A, Martens L, Declerck D. Caries patterns in primary dentition in 3-, 5- and 7-year-old children: spatial correlation and preventive consequences. Caries Res. 2007;41(1):16–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Gizani S, Vinckier F, Declerck D. Caries pattern and oral health habits in 2- to 6-year-old children exhibiting differing levels of caries. Clin Oral Investig. 1999;3(1):35–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Margolis M, Hunt R, Vann W, Stewart P. Distribution of primary tooth caries in first-grade children from two nonfluoridated US communities. Paediatr Dent. 1994;16(3):200–5.Google Scholar
  50. Elfrink ME, Schuller AA, Veerkamp JS, Poorterman JH, Moll HA, Ten Cate BJ. Factors increasing the caries risk of second primary molars in 5-year-old Dutch children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010;20(2):151–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Lynch RJ. The primary and mixed dentition, post-eruptive enamel maturation and dental caries: a review. Int Dent J. 2013;63 Suppl 2:3–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Baginska J, Rodakowska E, Milewski R, Kierklo A. Dental caries in primary and permanent molars in 7-8-year-old schoolchildren evaluated with Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST) index. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:74.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Autio-Gold JT, Tomar SL. Prevalence of noncavitated and cavitated carious lesions in 5-year-old head start schoolchildren in Alachua County, Florida. Paediatr Dent. 2005;27(1):54–60.Google Scholar
  54. Zhang S, Liu J, Lo EC, Chu CH. Dental caries status of Dai preschool children in Yunnan Province, China. BMC Oral Health. 2013;13:68.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Murthy AK, Pramila M, Ranganath S. Prevalence of clinical consequences of untreated dental caries and its relation to dental fear among 12-15-year-old schoolchildren in Bangalore city, India. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(1):45–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. American Academy of peadiatric dentistry. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. http://www.aapd.org/media/Policies_Guidelines/G_Pulp.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2015.
  57. Kühnisch J, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Schäfer E. Endodontie im Milchgebiss. http://www.dgzmk.de/uploads/tx_szdgzmkdocuments/2011-03-25_Stellungnahme__MZ-Endo_korrigiert.pdf. Accessed 24 Mar 2015.
  58. Holmgren C, van Palenstein Helderman W, Monse B, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Benzian H. Modifications to the PUFA index: are they justified at this stage? Med Prin Pract. 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000357271.
  59. Aggeryt T. Goals for oral health in the year 2000: cooperation between WHO, FDI and the national dental associations. Int Dent J. 1983;33(1):55–9.Google Scholar
  60. Frencken JE, de Amorim RG, Faber J, Leal SC. The Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST) index: rational and development. Int Dent J. 2011;61(3):117–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. de Souza AL, Leal SC, Bronkhorst EM, Frencken JE. Assessing caries status according to the CAST instrument and WHO criterion in epidemiological studies. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:119.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Grund et al. 2015

Advertisement