Skip to main content

Ca2+ release and buffering effects of synthetic hydroxyapatite following bacterial acid challenge

Abstract

Background

Synthetic particulate hydroxyapatite (HAP; Ca5(PO4)3(OH)) is used as ingredient in oral care products but its effects on cariogenic biofilms are not clear yet. The primary mode of action of HAP may be acting as a calcium phosphate reservoir when deposited in oral biofilms and release Ca2+ and (hydrogen) phosphate ions upon bacterial acid challenge. The aim of this in vitro study was to test this hypothesis by investigating release of Ca2+ ions and potential buffering effects from HAP upon bacterial acid challenge in planktonic cultures and biofilms of Streptococcus mutans.

Methods

Planktonic cultures of S. mutans were grown in BHI broth with 1% sucrose or with additional 5% HAP or 5% silica for up to 48 h. Separately, biofilms of S. mutans were grown in BHI for 72 h in total. After 24 h of this biofilm culture, either BHI alone or BHI with additional 0.5% HAP or 0.5% silica was added. After 48 h, BHI with 1% sucrose was added to allow bacterial acid formation. Ca2+ release was determined colorimetrically and pH measurements were performed using a pH electrode. For statistical analysis, non-parametrical procedures were applied (n ≥ 10; Mann-Whitney U test; α = 0.05).

Results

Relevant release of Ca2+ was only evident in planktonic cultures or biofilms with HAP but not in both other groups (p ≤ 0.001). In suspended biofilms with HAP, median pH was 4.77 after 72 h and about 0.5 pH units higher as compared to both other groups (4.28 or 4.32, respectively; p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions

Under the tested conditions, synthetic HAP releases Ca2+ ions upon bacterial acid challenge and may also show some buffering capacity but further studies are needed to investigate whether the concentrations tested here can also be reached clinically in dental biofilms.

Peer Review reports

Background

According to the most recent Global Burden of Disease study, published in November 2018, dental caries still represents the most prevalent disease worldwide affecting about 2.3 billion adults and 532 million children [1]. Its related treatment costs thus represent a major economic burden for public health care [2, 3].

Dental caries is a biofilm-mediated disease which leads to demineralization of dental hard tissues due to acid production from oral biofilm bacteria that metabolize fermentable carbohydrates to organic acids [4, 5]. This can lead to many different chemical microenvironments with localized pH gradients within a biofilm [6]. Consequently, carious lesions do not result from a simple and continuously aggravating cumulative mineral loss but rather from a very dynamic process comprising alternating periods of demineralization with net mineral loss and periods of remineralization with net mineral gain due to calcium (Ca2+) and (hydrogen) phosphate (mostly H2PO4 and HPO42−) ions becoming deposited into the pores of the carious lesion; therefore, progression or reversal of early carious lesions depends on whether the balance between demineralization and remineralization is shifted in one direction or the other [4, 5, 7].

Fluoride compounds are the keystone of all contemporary caries prevention concepts [4, 5, 7]. Accordingly, the topical use of fluoride in toothpaste at concentrations ≥1000 ppm F has been shown to have high-certainty evidence for its caries-protective effects over non-fluoridated placebo toothpaste [8]. However, populations with high caries risk, e.g. orthodontic patients, patients suffering from hyposalivation or older patients in general, may benefit from additional measures in order to enhance the caries-protective effects provided by fluoride [7, 9]. In this context, calcium-based strategies have been discussed as potential boosters for caries protection when combined with fluoride compounds [7, 9,10,11]. Despite the supersaturation of saliva with Ca2+ with respect to enamel at neutral pH [12], there is an undersaturation in plaque fluid compared to the dental hard tissues under acidic conditions that may be reduced by a controlled release of Ca2+ [9]. Furthermore, the bioavailability of Ca2+ and (hydrogen) phosphate ions often represents a limiting factor for remineralization upon topical fluoride application, particularly in patients suffering from hyposalivation [7, 13, 14]. Consequently, several calcium phosphates have been described as potential caries-preventive agents, e.g. hydroxyapatite (HAP), α−/β-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP; β-TCP), and amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) [7, 9, 10], which all differ with regard to their respective composition, crystallinity, molar Ca/P ratio, and solubility (for more details see ref. [15]). Among these calcium-based caries-preventive agents, casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) has been studied intensively [7, 9, 10, 16], while recently several studies have been published investigating synthetic particulate HAP (Ca5(PO4)3(OH)) as another calcium phosphate-based compound [17,18,19,20]. HAP has often been proposed as a biomimetic agent for directly filling up micropores on demineralized tooth surfaces [17] and by reducing initial bacterial colonization on enamel surfaces [18]. However, in patients exhibiting high plaque scores the primary mode of action of HAP as an oral care agent may be to act as a calcium phosphate reservoir when deposited in oral biofilms, potentially releasing Ca2+ and (hydrogen) phosphate ions H2PO4, HPO42− and PO43− upon bacterial acid challenge and thus maintaining a state of higher saturation with respect to these ions at the tooth surface [19, 20].

To test this hypothesis, this in vitro study served as a proof-of-principle investigation examining whether synthetic particulate HAP releases Ca2+ ions upon bacterial acid challenge when it is present at high concentrations in planktonic cultures or biofilms of Streptococcus mutans. Furthermore, potential buffering effects of HAP were investigated.

Methods

Test substances

Synthetic particulate hydroxyapatite (HAP; commercial grade; mean particle size: 4 μm) and particulate hydrated silica (SiO2·nH2O; commercial grade; mean particle size: 12 μm) were both provided by Dr. Kurt Wolff GmbH & Co. KG (Bielefeld, Germany). A recent scanning electron microscopic structural characterization of the HAP powder used here showed that the particles are micrometer-sized stable clusters of crystallites resembling the structure of human enamel [21]. Hydrated silica was used as control to exclude any impairments of particulate agents on bacterial growth or biofilm formation.

Bacterial culture

Streptococcus mutans (DSM 20523; NCTC 10449) was obtained from the DSMZ (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen, Braunschweig, Germany). Bacteria were grown and maintained on Schaedler Agar plates (provided by the Institute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany) under aerobic conditions. Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as basal nutrient broth. Planktonic cultures were prepared by selecting colonies, suspending them in 5 mL BHI and culturing over-night aerobically in order to obtain bacteria in the stationary phase of growth.

pH and Ca2+ release in planktonic cultures

Over-night cultures of S. mutans were harvested by centrifugation (ROTINA 420 R, Hettich Lab Technology, Tuttlingen, Germany), washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and resuspended in 1 mL BHI yielding an optical density (OD) of 1.0 measured at 600 nm by means of a spectrophotometer (Ultrospec 3300 pro, Amersham Biosciences, Amersham, UK). These suspensions were transferred to brand-new glass baffled flasks (Schikane-Kolben, Schott, Mainz, Germany) containing 20 mL BHI with 1% sucrose either alone or in combination with 5% (w/v) HAP or 5% (w/v) silica. The baffled flasks were incubated at 37 °C for a total culture period of 48 h on an orbital shaker (100 rpm), which kept HAP or silica particles dispersed during culture. At baseline, after 24 h and after 48 h, pH was measured by means of a pH meter (HI 2211, HANNA Instruments, Woonsocket, RI, USA) and release of Ca2+ was determined colorimetrically (Calcium assay kit ab102505; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) by measuring OD at 575 nm on a Varioskan® Flash microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

pH and Ca2+ release in biofilms, CFU assay

Over-night cultures of S. mutans were centrifuged, resuspended in BHI yielding an OD of 0.1 measured at 600 nm and further diluted tenfold in BHI. Biofilms were formed in 24-well polystyrene culture plates (Corning® Costar®, Corning, NY, USA). Wells were filled with 1.5 mL BHI containing S. mutans and incubated at 37 °C under aerobic conditions. After 24 h, medium was carefully discarded and fresh BHI (untreated control) or fresh BHI with 0.5% (w/v) HAP or 0.5% (w/v) silica was added, and biofilms were incubated. After 48 h, medium was carefully removed and fresh BHI with addition of 1% sucrose was added to allow acid formation and biofilms were incubated for another 24 h.

After a total culture period of 72 h, the supernatants were carefully discarded and used for supernatant pH measurements and colorimetric determination of Ca2+ release (as described above). Then, biofilms were suspended in 1 mL 0.9% NaCl and transferred to Eppendorf tubes. These were placed in an ultrasonic water-bath chamber operating at 35 kHz (Sonorex Super RK 102 H, Bandelin, Berlin, Germany) for 10 min and vortexed (REAX top, Heidolph Instruments, Schwabach, Germany) for 5 s in order to separate aggregated bacteria. Then, these biofilm-derived suspensions were used for pH measurements and colorimetric determination of Ca2+ release (as described above). Tenfold serial dilutions (10− 2 to 10− 7) were prepared from the biofilms in 0.9% NaCl and aliquots (3 × 20 μL) were plated on Schaedler agar plates according to the method described by Miles et al. [22]. These were incubated anaerobically for 48 h, after which colony forming units (CFU) were evaluated.

Data analysis

Results from pH measurements and colorimetric Ca2+ release assays are shown as medians, 1st and 3rd quartiles and were calculated using SPSS, v. 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) from the values of at least 10 (planktonic) or 12 (biofilm) independent duplicate experiments, respectively. For calculating Ca2+ concentrations from OD values, a standard was prepared according to the manufacturer’s guidelines (Calcium assay kit ab102505). OD values were fitted on a linear curve (r2 = 0.96) using Table Curve 2D (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Data were analyzed statistically by applying non-parametric procedures (Mann-Whitney U test) for pairwise comparisons between groups on an α = 0.05 level of significance using SPSS. CFU results were calculated as medians, 1st and 3rd quartiles with SPSS from the values of at least 6 independent experiments, each performed in duplicate.

Results

pH and Ca2+ release in planktonic cultures

Figure 1 shows pH and Ca2+ release in planktonic cultures of S. mutans. At baseline, median [1st; 3rd quartile] pH was 7.1 [7.05; 7.16] for BHI alone, 7.14 [7.08; 7.18] for BHI + 5% HAP and 6.98 [6.93; 7.02] for BHI + 5% silica, whereby the latter was found to be statistically significantly different compared to the other groups (p = 0.002). After 24 h of incubation, pH dropped to 4.66 [4.52; 5.6] for BHI alone, 5.38 [4.83; 5.42] for BHI + 5% HAP and 4.88 [4.67; 5.44] for BHI + 5% silica. After 48 h, pH further decreased to 4.49 [4.42; 4.96] for BHI alone, 4.81 [4.78; 5.01] for BHI + 5% HAP and 4.62 [4.55; 5.02] for BHI + 5% silica. There were no statistically significant differences at 24 h and 48 h of planktonic incubation between the groups (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1
figure1

pH and Ca2+ release in planktonic cultures. Results from pH (a) and Ca2+ release measurements (b) in planktonic cultures of S. mutans at baseline and after 24 h and 48 h of culture. All results are depicted medians, 1st and 3rd quartiles from the values of at least 10 independent duplicate experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between groups (** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001)

Release of Ca2+ was evident for BHI + 5% HAP (median Ca2+ concentrations [1st; 3rd quartile] of 38.9 μg/mL [36.8; 41.0] at 24 h and 38.1 μg/mL [33.3; 43.1] at 48 h) but not for BHI alone (0.0 μg/mL [0.0; 0.06] at 24 h and 0.0 μg/mL [0.0; 1.1] at 48 h) and only very slightly for BHI + 5% silica (3.8 μg/mL [2.9; 4.8] at 24 h and 5.4 μg/mL [4.6; 6.3] at 48 h). Statistically significant differences were found between BHI + 5% silica and the other groups at all timepoints and between BHI + 5% HAP and the other groups at 24 h and 48 h (p ≤ 0.001 in all cases; Fig. 1b).

pH and Ca2+ release in biofilms

Figure 2 shows pH and Ca2+ release in S. mutans biofilms. At baseline, median pH was between 7.18 and 7.21 for all groups. Supernatants collected after 24 h of biofilm culture exhibited median pH between 5.00 and 5.03 for all groups, which decreased to median [1st; 3rd quartile] pH 4.39 [4.28; 4.49] for BHI alone, 4.29 [4.24; 4.54] for BHI + 0.5% HAP and 4.48 [4.32; 4.7] for BHI + 0.5% silica for supernatants collected after 72 h of biofilm growth with a statistically significant difference between BHI + 0.5% HAP and BHI + 0.5% silica (p = 0.004). Suspended biofilms exhibited median pH 4.28 [4.25; 4.4] for BHI alone and 4.32 [4.2; 4.41] for BHI + 0.5% silica, while pH was statistically significantly higher for BHI + 0.5% HAP (4.77 [4.67; 5.03]); p ≤ 0.001; Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2
figure2

pH and Ca2+ release in biofilms. Results from pH (a) and Ca2+ release measurements (b) in S. mutans biofilms. pH was measured in the growth medium at baseline, in supernatants after 24 h of culture and in supernatants as well as suspended biofilms after 72 h of culture. Ca2+ release was measured in supernatants and suspended biofilms after 72 h. All results are depicted medians, 1st and 3rd quartiles from the values of at least 12 independent duplicate experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between groups (** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001)

Ca2+ release was detected in the BHI + 0.5% HAP group in supernatants collected after 72 h (median Ca2+ concentrations [1st; 3rd quartile] of 43.4 μg/mL [41.3; 45.3]) and in suspended biofilms (56.6 μg/mL [54.2; 60.3]), whereas no relevant Ca2+ release was found for BHI alone (0.0 μg/mL [0.0; 0.0] in supernatants and 2.6 μg/mL [1.0; 4.3] in suspended biofilms) or BHI + 0.5% silica (0.0 μg/mL [0.0; 0.0] in supernatants and 9.6 μg/mL [7.5; 12.4] in suspended biofilms. Differences were statistically significant between BHI + 0.5% HAP and the other groups in 72 h supernatants and between all groups in suspended biofilms (p ≤ 0.001 in all cases; Fig. 1b).

CFU assay

All biofilms showed growth of viable bacteria exhibiting median [1st; 3rd quartile] CFU-numbers in the same order of magnitude with 1.4 × 107 [8.8 × 106; 2.1 × 107] for BHI, 5.5 × 107 [2.9 × 107; 7.1 × 107] for BHI + 0.5% HAP and 2.6 × 107 [1.5 × 107; 3.7 × 107] for BHI + 0.5% silica CFU per biofilm.

Discussion

The present in vitro study served as a proof-of-principle investigation for evaluating whether bacterial acid challenge can cause release of Ca2+ ions and consequent pH-buffering effects from the potentially caries-protective oral care agent HAP when it is present at relatively high concentrations in planktonic cultures and biofilms. For this purpose, planktonic cultures and biofilms of S. mutans served as model systems. S. mutans is well known for its role in the pathogenesis of dental caries and its ability to extensively produce extracellular polymeric substances that promote bacterial attachment and biofilm formation [23]. For this study, S. mutans was chosen rather than other caries-associated bacteria due to its pronounced acidogenic [24] and aciduric [25] properties.

In the first part of this study, planktonic cultures of S. mutans were grown either in pure nutrient broth or nutrient broth with 5% HAP or with 5% silica. The relatively high concentration of 5% was chosen analogously to a recent in situ study, which used a 5% HAP mouthwash and showed some slightly anti-adhesive effects of this mouthwash [18]. Silica is a frequently used toothpaste abrasive [26], and was included as control for excluding potential impairing effects of particles on bacterial growth or biofilm formation. Due to the experimental set-up (i.e. culture on an orbital shaker for keeping HAP or silica particles dispersed), it was inevitable to culture S. mutans under aerobic conditions. Ahn et al. described several biochemical and phenotypic changes in S. mutans during aerobic growth (including acidogenicity), but also concluded that S. mutans is highly adaptable to different environments [27]. On the contrary, Higuchi et al. showed that the growth of the S. mutans strain used in the present study (DSM 20523, NCTC 10449) was enhanced by oxygen and retarded by anaerobiosis. Furthermore, this specific strain also produced more lactate under aerobic conditions, whereas anaerobiosis led to heterolactic fermentation with production of mainly ethanol and formate [28]. Accordingly, pH values around pH 4.5 after 48 h clearly showed relevant acid production from S. mutans although these cultures may have mainly comprised bacterial cells in a stationary phase due to the rather high starting inoculum. Sucrose (at a concentration of 1%) was chosen as a carbon source in the nutrient broth because this has been found to be support the highest acid production from S. mutans [29, 30].

In the presence of HAP, there was a significant release of Ca2+ resulting in median Ca2+ concentrations in the nutrient broth of 38.9 or 38.1 μg/mL after 24 or 48 h respectively. Salivary Ca2+ concentrations have been reported to range between 20 and 55 μg/mL [11, 31,32,33]. This means that, under the given experimental conditions, Ca2+ release from HAP was in the same range as the concentration of human salivary Ca2+ and may thus be considered relevant, although HAP dispersed in planktonic bacteria does not directly resemble any natural situation in the oral cavity. On the other hand, the slight but significant Ca2+ increases found for the silica group as compared to the group with nutrient broth alone may be attributed to minor calcium impurities in the chosen silica. After 24 h and 48 h of planktonic culture, there was a tendency for slightly higher pH in the HAP group as compared to the other two groups.

These results could be affirmed in the biofilm experiments which may be more relevant with respect to the natural situation in vivo. Here, S. mutans biofilms were incubated for 72 h in total, whereby after 24 h either pure nutrient broth or nutrient broth with 0.5% HAP or with 0.5% silica were allowed to sediment on the preformed initial biofilms and after 48 h nutrient broth with 1% sucrose was added to promote bacterial acid production. The use of single-species S. mutans biofilms may be seen as a limitation here but polymicrobial biofilms may have caused problems in terms of species-species interactions that may have diminished acid production. Therefore, we chose a single-species biofilm model with an S. mutans strain that is known to produce high loads of lactic acid [28]. The concentration of 0.5% of HAP or silica, respectively, was chosen to mimic dilution effects as they may occur in the oral cavity after using a mouthwash with 5% HAP [18]. In contrast to previous works [34, 35], we used no filter-sterilized saliva here to promote biofilm formation as salivary Ca2+ ions (concentrations between 20 and 55 μg/mL [11, 31,32,33], as described above), may have impeded Ca2+ release measurements.

After 72 h of biofilm culture, there was a clear Ca2+ release corresponding to median Ca2+ concentrations of 43.4 or 56.5 μg/mL in the supernatants and suspended biofilms, respectively, while no such effects were found in either of the other groups. Therefore, HAP may act as a calcium reservoir when present in dental biofilms and release Ca2+ following bacterially induced pH drops, thus potentially reducing demineralization by providing supersaturation with respect to calcium phosphate in the plaque fluid. Zhang et al. investigated whether the presence of biofilms has effects on the treatment outcomes of nano-HAP and sodium fluoride [36]. They cultured biofilms on artificially demineralized enamel specimens and subjected them to a pH-cycling schedule with twice daily applications of nano-HAP or sodium fluoride. For nano-HAP treatment, they found an enhanced demineralization protection in specimens with biofilms during pH-cycling which they attributed to the high calcium content in the biofilms that may act as a diffusion barrier, potentially slowing the outflux of calcium and phosphate [36]. Accordingly, Shaw et al. found as early as 1983 that Ca2+ concentrations in plaque were statistically significantly higher in caries-free children (anterior plaque: 11.55 μg/mg dry weight; posterior plaque: 3.57 μg/mg) compared to children who had been highly caries-active within the last two years, exhibiting a mean DMFS of 25.9 (anterior plaque: 2.57 μg/mg; posterior plaque: 1.63 μg/mg) [31].

Interestingly, pH was found to be significantly higher (about 0.5 pH units) in suspended biofilms of the HAP group compared to the other two groups. The buffering effects observed for HAP may be explained by its chemical properties. Calcium phosphates in general are basic and release Ca2+ and (hydrogen)phosphate ions H2PO4 and HPO42− under acidic conditions. The corresponding equation for HAP around pH 4.5 (like in the present study) is, as follows:

$$ {\mathrm{Ca}}_5{\left({\mathrm{PO}}_4\right)}_3\left(\mathrm{OH}\right)+7\ {\mathrm{H}}^{+}\rightarrow 5\ {\mathrm{Ca}}^{2+}+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}+3\ {\mathrm{H}}_2{{\mathrm{PO}}_4}^{-} $$

The release of H2PO4 may act as an additional buffer system similar to the phosphate buffer system found in human saliva [5, 12]. An in vitro study showed that the buffering range of calcium phosphates is around pH 4 [37]. Thus, HAP may show its best buffering efficacy in highly acidic environments like cariogenic biofilms following carbohydrate ingestion as in the present study. Nedeljkovic et al. evaluated the buffering ability of dental restorative materials and included HAP discs as a control material [38]. They found the highest buffering capacity among the tested materials for HAP and observed higher pH increases for lower starting pH values, which they attributed to increasing dissolution of HAP with decreasing pH [38].

These findings are in accordance with Huang et al. who investigated the remineralizing effects of nano-HAP on demineralized bovine enamel under pH-cycling conditions [19]. They found that the surface microhardness increased and the integrated mineral loss significantly decreased as pH decreased, with the most effective group found at pH 4 [19]. In contrast, Zhang et al. found no increased remineralization in their study described above. They explained the discrepancy to the findings from Huang et al. by different components in their remineralization/demineralization buffers (mainly proteins) which may block the enamel surface to some extent [36]. In a recent in situ-study, Amaechi et al. found remineralization of artificially produced carious lesions on enamel blocks that were worn in situ on intra-oral appliances after use of a toothpaste containing 10% HAP [39].

Lately, it was also reported that application of CPP-ACP may have prebiotic-like effects on microbial ecology in highly cariogenic environments by increasing the buffering capacity of the biofilm and favoring growth of commensal species [40, 41]. Given the findings reported here, this may also hold true for other calcium phosphates like HAP.

Although these findings are promising, there are two limitations of this study that must be considered when interpreting its results: 1) HAP was sedimented onto the biofilms after 24 h of culture. So, it is not clear whether HAP accumulates in oral biofilms in vivo, although Vogel et al. already demonstrated the general possibility for accumulation of calcium phosphates in dental plaque when evaluating Ca2+ concentrations in plaque fluid after use of an α-TCP-containing chewing gum [11]. 2) HAP was added to the biofilms in a relatively high concentration (0.5%) that may exceed the concentrations found in dental biofilms in vivo. For these reasons, the present study only resembles “optimal conditions”. Future studies will have to show whether and to what extent synthetic HAP accumulates in oral biofilms following application of HAP-containing oral care products like mouthwashes. Furthermore, comparing Ca2+ release from different calcium phosphates like HAP, ACP or α−/β-TCP upon bacterial acid challenge may be an interesting topic for further studies.

Conclusions

This in vitro study serves as a proof-of-principle investigation demonstrating that synthetic particulate HAP releases Ca2+ ions upon bacterially induced acid challenge when present in S. mutans biofilms at high concentrations. Furthermore, HAP showed a slight buffering capacity in biofilms of about 0.5 pH units. Future studies will have to show whether the HAP concentrations tested here can be reached clinically in dental biofilms upon application of HAP-containing oral care products.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HAP:

Hydroxyapatite

α-TCP:

α-tricalcium phosphate

β-TCP:

β-tricalcium phosphate

ACP:

Amorphous calcium phosphate

CPP-ACP:

Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate

BHI:

Brain heart infusion

OD:

Optical density

CFU:

Colony forming units

References

  1. 1.

    James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Righolt AJ, Jevdjevic M, Marcenes W, Listl S. Global-, regional-, and country-level economic impacts of dental diseases in 2015. J Dent Res. 2018;97:501–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJL, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015;94:650–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD, Ekstrand K, Weintraub JA, Ramos-Gomez F, et al. Dental caries. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd E. Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2015.

  6. 6.

    Bowen WH, Burne RA, Wu H, Koo H. Oral biofilms: pathogens, matrix, and Polymicrobial interactions in microenvironments. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26:229–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Philip N. State of the art enamel remineralization systems: the next frontier in caries management. Caries Res. 2018;53:284–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny A-M, Marinho VC, Jeroncic A. Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries. Cochrane Oral health group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3:CD007868.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fontana M. Enhancing fluoride: clinical human studies of alternatives or boosters for caries management. Caries Res. 2016;50:22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bijle MNA, Yiu CKY, Ekambaram M. Calcium-based caries preventive agents: a meta-evaluation of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2018;18:203–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Vogel GL, Zhang Z, Carey CM, Ly A, Chow LC, Proskin HM. Composition of plaque and saliva following a sucrose challenge and use of an alpha-tricalcium-phosphate-containing chewing gum. J Dent Res. 1998;77:518–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lynge Pedersen AM, Belstrøm D. The role of natural salivary defences in maintaining a healthy oral microbiota. J Dent. 2019;80(Suppl 1):S3–S12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Vogel GL, Schumacher GE, Chow LC, Takagi S, Carey CM. Ca pre-rinse greatly increases plaque and plaque fluid F. J Dent Res. 2008;87:466–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Reynolds EC, Cai F, Cochrane NJ, Shen P, Walker GD, Morgan MV, et al. Fluoride and casein Phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate. J Dent Res. 2008;87:344–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dorozhkin SV, Epple M. Biological and medical significance of calcium phosphates. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2002;41:3130–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tao S, Zhu Y, Yuan H, Tao S, Cheng Y, Li J, et al. Efficacy of fluorides and CPP-ACP vs fluorides monotherapy on early caries lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wierichs RJ, editor. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0196660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Amaechi BT, van Loveren C. Fluorides and non-fluoride remineralization systems. Monogr Oral SciBasel: Karger Publishers. 2013;23:15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kensche A, Holder C, Basche S, Tahan N, Hannig C, Hannig M. Efficacy of a mouthrinse based on hydroxyapatite to reduce initial bacterial colonisation in situ. Arch Oral Biol. 2017;80:18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Huang S, Gao S, Cheng L, Yu H. Remineralization potential of nano-hydroxyapatite on initial enamel lesions: an in vitro study. Caries Res. 2011;45:460–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Schlagenhauf U, Kunzelmann KH, Hannig C, May TW, Hösl H, Gratza M, et al. Impact of a non-fluoridated microcrystalline hydroxyapatite dentifrice on enamel caries progression in highly caries-susceptible orthodontic patients: a randomized, controlled 6-month trial. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019;59:e12399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Fabritius-Vilpoux K, Enax J, Herbig M, Raabe D, Fabritius H-O. Quantitative affinity parameters of synthetic hydroxyapatite and enamel surfaces in vitro. Bioinspir Biomim Nan. 2019;8:141–53.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Miles AA, Misra SS, Irwin JO. The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. J Hyg (London). 1938;38:732–49.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Klein MI, Hwang G, Santos PHS, Campanella OH, Koo H. Streptococcus mutans-derived extracellular matrix in cariogenic oral biofilms. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2015;5:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    de Soet JJ, Nyvad B, Kilian M. Strain-related acid production by oral streptococci. Caries Res. 2000;34:486–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Matsui R, Cvitkovitch D. Acid tolerance mechanisms utilized by Streptococcus mutans. Future Microbiol. 2010;5:403–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wülknitz P. Cleaning power and abrasivity of European toothpastes. Adv Dent Res. 1997;11:576–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ahn S-J, Ahn S-J, Browngardt CM, Burne RA. Changes in biochemical and phenotypic properties of Streptococcus mutans during growth with aeration. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:2517–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Higuchi M. The effect of oxygen on the growth and mannitol fermentation of streptococcus mutants. J Gen Microbiol. 1984;130:1819–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kim M, Jeon J, Kim J. Streptococcus mutans extracellular DNA levels depend on the number of bacteria in a biofilm. Sci Rep. 2018;8:13313–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cai J-N, Jung J-E, Lee M-H, Choi H-M, Jeon J-G. Sucrose challenges to Streptococcus mutans biofilms and the curve fitting for the biofilm changes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94:28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Shaw L, Murray JJ, Burchell CK, Best JS. Calcium and phosphorus content of plaque and saliva in relation to dental caries. Caries Res. 1983;17:543–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Whitford GM, Wasdin JL, Schafer TE, Adair SM. Plaque fluoride concentrations are dependent on plaque calcium concentrations. Caries Res. 2002;36:256–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Poff AM, Pearce EL, Larsen MJ, Cutress TW. Human supragingival in vivo calculus formation in relation to saturation of saliva with respect to calcium phosphates. Arch Oral Biol. 1997;42:93–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Cieplik F, Kara E, Muehler D, Enax J, Hiller K-A, Maisch T, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of alternative compounds for use in oral care toward biofilms from caries-associated bacteria in vitro. Microbiologyopen. 2019;8:e00695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cieplik F, Wimmer F, Muehler D, Thurnheer T, Belibasakis GN, Hiller K-A, et al. Phenalen-1-one-mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and chlorhexidine applied to a novel caries biofilm model. Caries Res. 2018;52:447–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhang M, He LB, Exterkate RAM, Cheng L, Li JY, ten JM C, et al. Biofilm layers affect the treatment outcomes of NaF and Nano-hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res. 2015;94:602–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Schiller C, Epple M. Carbonated calcium phosphates are suitable pH-stabilising fillers for biodegradable polyesters. Biomaterials. 2003;24:2037–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Nedeljkovic I, De Munck J, Slomka V, Van Meerbeek B, Teughels W, Van Landuyt KL. Lack of buffering by composites promotes shift to more cariogenic bacteria. J Dent Res. 2016;95:875–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Amaechi BT, AbdulAzees PA, Alshareif DO, Shehata MA, de Carvalho Sampaio Lima PP, Abdollahi A, et al. Comparative efficacy of a hydroxyapatite and a fluoride toothpaste for prevention and remineralization of dental caries in children. BDJ Open. 2019;5:18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Philip N, Leishman SJ, Bandara HMHN, Walsh LJ. Casein Phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate attenuates virulence and modulates microbial ecology of saliva-derived Polymicrobial biofilms. Caries Res. 2019;53:643–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Dashper SG, Shen P, Sim CPC, Liu SW, Butler CA, Mitchell HL, et al. CPP-ACP promotes SnF2 efficacy in a Polymicrobial caries model. J Dent Res. 2019;98:218–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Prof. Dr. Tim Maisch and Dr. Konstantin J. Scholz are gratefully acknowledged for helpful discussions. Special thanks are given to Priv.-Doz. Dr. Áine M. Lennon for linguistic improvements of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded in part by an industrial research grant from Dr. Kurt Wolff GmbH & Co. KG (Bielefeld, Germany). FC received funding from the Medical Faculty of the University of Regensburg within the ReForM B program. The funders had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FC, WB, JE, FM and KAH conceived and designed the experiments. CMR, SH and DM performed the experiments. FC, DM, KAH and WB analyzed the data. FC wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. The authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabian Cieplik.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

This study was funded in part by an industrial research grant from Dr. Kurt Wolff GmbH & Co. KG (Bielefeld, Germany) and two authors (JE, FM) are employees of this company. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cieplik, F., Rupp, C.M., Hirsch, S. et al. Ca2+ release and buffering effects of synthetic hydroxyapatite following bacterial acid challenge. BMC Oral Health 20, 85 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01080-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Biofilm
  • Streptococcus mutans
  • Synthetic hydroxyapatite
  • Oral care
  • Dental caries