Fyffe HE, Kay EJ. Assessment of dental health state utilities. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1992;20(5):269–73.
Article
Google Scholar
*Birch S, Sohn W, Ismail AI, Lepkowski JM, Belli RF. Willingness to pay for dentin regeneration in a sample of dentate adults. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004;32(3):210–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Kathmandu RY. The burden of restorative dental treatment for children in Third World countries. Int Dent J. 2002;52(1):1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
*Vernazza CR, Steele JG, Whitworth JM, Wildman JR, Donaldson C. Factors affecting direction and strength of patient preferences for treatment of molar teeth with nonvital pulps. Int Endod J. 2015;48(12):1137–46.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
De Bekker-Grob EW, Hol L, Donkers B, Van Dam L, Habbema JD, Van Leerdam ME, Kuipers EJ, Essink-Bot ML, Steyerberg EW. Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: an application to colorectal cancer screening. Value Health. 2010;13(2):315–23.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
*Matthews D, Rocchi A, Gafni A. Putting your money where your mouth is. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(4):245–55.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Donaldson C. Willingness to pay and publicly funded health care: contradiction in terms? InSeminar Briefings 2011 Nov 1 (No. 000173). Office of Health Economics.
Diener A, O’Brien B, Gafni A. Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature. Health Econ. 1998;7(4):313–26.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Olsen JA, Smith RD. Theory versus practice: a review of ‘willingness-to-pay’in health and health care. Health Econ. 2001;10(1):39–52.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
*Halvorsen B, Willumsen T. Willingness to pay for dental fear treatment. Eur J Health Econ. 2004;5(4):299–308.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Smith RD, Harris AH, Olsen JA. A review of methodological issues in the conduct of WTP studies in health care II: administration of a CV survey. West Heidelberg: Centre for Health Program Evaluation; 1999.
Google Scholar
Carson RT, Hanemann WM. Contingent valuation. Handb Environ Econ. 2005;1(2):821–936.
Article
Google Scholar
Calder J, Overland J, Uttal T, Richter-Menge J, Rigor I, Crane K. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) arctic climate change studies: a contribution to IPY. AGUFM. 2004;2004:C21A-0960.
Google Scholar
Frew EJ, Whynes DK, Wolstenholme JL. Eliciting willingness to pay: comparing closed-ended with open-ended and payment scale formats. Med Decis Mak. 2003;23(2):150–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Venkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method: a review. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2004;24(1):89–124.
Article
Google Scholar
Smith RD. It’s not just what you do, it’s the way that you do it: the effect of different payment card formats and survey administration on willingness to pay for health gain. Health Econ. 2006;15(3):281–93.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Johannesson M, Meltzer D. Some reflections on cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ. 1998;7(1):1–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Matthews DC, Gafni A, Birch S. Preference based measurements in dentistry: a review of the literature and recommendations for research. Commun Dent Health. 1999;16(1):5–11.
Google Scholar
Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. Relationship between utility values and willingness to pay in patients undergoing orthognathic treatment. Commun Dent Health. 2000;17(2):92–6.
Google Scholar
Birch S, Ismail AI. Patient preferences and the measurement of utilities in the evaluation of dental technologies. J Dent Res. 2002;81(7):446–50.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Smith RD, Sach TH. Contingent valuation: what needs to be done? Health Economics, Policy and Law. 2010;5(1):91–111.
Article
Google Scholar
Tan SH, Vernazza CR, Nair R. Critical review of willingness to pay for clinical oral health interventions. J Dent. 2017;1(64):1–2.
Article
Google Scholar
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.
Article
Google Scholar
*Vernazza CR, Wildman JR, Steele JG, Whitworth JM, Walls AW, Perry R, Matthews R, Hahn P, Donaldson C. Factors affecting patient valuations of caries prevention: using and validating the willingness to pay method. J Dent. 2015;43(8):981–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
*Ramsay CR, Clarkson JE, Duncan A, Lamont TJ, Heasman PA, Boyers D, Goulão B, Bonetti D, Bruce R, Gouick J, Heasman L. Improving the Quality of Dentistry (IQuaD): a cluster factorial randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-benefit of oral hygiene advice and/or periodontal instrumentation with routine care for the prevention and management of periodontal disease in dentate adults attending dental primary care. Health Technology Assessment. 2018.
*Walshaw EG, Adam NI, Palmeiro ML, Neves M, Vernazza CR. Patients’ and parents’ valuation of fluoride varnish in the UK and Brazil. Oral Health Prevent Dent. 2019;17(3):211.
Google Scholar
*Dixon S, Shackley P. Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999;27(2):124–9.
Article
Google Scholar
* Edwards CH. An evaluation of the socioeconomic viability of a dental health care reform in Norway: a willingness to pay approach. Master's thesis.
*Kettlewell N. Policy choice in a complicated health insurance market: Do people get it right?
*Re D, Fessi S, Augusti G, Augusti D. The patient’s side: Willingness-to-pay index for computerized anesthesia.
*Re D, Del Fabbro M, Karanxha L, Augusti G, Augusti D, Fessi S, Taschieri S. Minimally-invasive dental anesthesia: patients’ preferences and analysis of the willingness-to-pay index. J Invest Clin Dent. 2018;9(1):e12275.
Google Scholar
*Bratberg I. Are youths aged 18–30 years willing to pay for dental insurance? A willingness-to-pay analysis. Master's thesis.
*Tianviwat S, Chongsuvivatwong V, Birch S. Different dental care setting: does income matter? Health Econ. 2008a;17(1):109–18.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
*Tianviwat S, Chongsuvivatwong V, Birch S. Prevention versus cure: measuring parental preferences for sealants and fillings as treatments for childhood caries in Southern Thailand. Health Policy. 2008b;86(1):64–71.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
*Tuominen R. Evaluation of three methods assessing the relative value of a dental program. Acta Odontol Scand. 2008;66(2):82–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
*Vermaire JH, Van Exel NJ, Van Loveren C, Brouwer WB. Putting your money where your mouth is: parents’ valuation of good oral health of their children. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(12):2200–6.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
*Chau, Man-ho, Jimmy. Dental care programme for Hong Kong secondary school students: parents' choices and willingness to pay (2014). https://hdl.handle.net/10722/206534.
*Sever I, Verbič M, Sever EK. Valuing the delivery of dental care: heterogeneity in patients’ preferences and willingness-to-pay for dental care attributes. J Dent. 2018;1(69):93–101.
Google Scholar
*Ndambiri H, Rotich E. Valuing excess fluoride removal for safe drinking water in Kenya. Water Policy. 2018;20(5):953–65.
Article
Google Scholar
*Marvasti A. A contingent valuation of customer delay in medical services. Eastern Econ J. 2006;32(1):31–45.
Google Scholar
*Balevi B, Shepperd S. The management of an endodontically abscessed tooth: patient health state utility, decision-tree and economic analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2007;7(1):17.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
*Manickam S, Selvakumar R, Devadason P. An economic analysis of willingness to pay for root canal treatment for dental caries in Thoothukudi District, Tamilnadu. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent. 2010;8(16):208.
Google Scholar
*Al Garni B, Pani SC, AlMaaz A, Al Qeshtaini E, Abu-Haimed H, Al SK. Factors affecting the willingness to pay for implants: a study of patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Dent Res J. 2012;9(6):719.
Google Scholar
*Moshkelgosha V, Salahi MA, Rostami S. Evaluation of perceived acceptability, beauty and value of different orthodontic brackets. J Dent Biomater. 2015;2(1):33–8.
Google Scholar
*McKenna G, Tada S, Woods N, Hayes M, DaMata C, Allen PF. Tooth replacement for partially dentate elders: a willingness-to-pay analysis. J Dent. 2016;1(53):51–6.
Article
Google Scholar
*Vernazza CR, Anderson L, Hunter AI, Leck HC, O’Connor SD, Smith GR, Stokes RJ, Rolland SL. The value of orthodontics: do parents’ willingness-to-pay values reflect the IOTN? JDR Clin Transl Res. 2018;3(2):141–9.
Article
Google Scholar
*Pavlova M, Groot W, Van Merode G. Willingness and ability of Bulgarian consumers to pay for improved public health care services. Appl Econ. 2004;36(10):1117–30.
Article
Google Scholar
*Smith AS, Cunningham SJ. Which factors influence willingness-to-pay for orthognathic treatment? Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(5):499–506.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
*Oscarson N, Lindholm L, Källestål C. The value of caries preventive care among 19-year olds using the contingent valuation method within a cost–benefit approach. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35(2):109–17.
Article
Google Scholar
*Widström E, Seppälä T. Willingness and ability to pay for unexpected dental expenses by Finnish adults. BMC Oral Health. 2012;12(1):35.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
*Srivastava A, Esfandiari S, Madathil SA, Birch S, Feine JS. Willingness to pay for mandibular overdentures: a societal perspective. JDR Clin Transl Res. 2020;5(1):30–9.
Article
Google Scholar
*Ethier MC, Regier DA, Tomlinson D, Judd P, Doyle J, Gassas A, Naqvi A, Sung L. Perspectives toward oral mucositis prevention from parents and health care professionals in pediatric cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(8):1771–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
*Mubaraki S, Abubotain S, AlDhahri S, AlGhamdi R, AlOtaibi R, Pani S. Willingness of parents to pay for space maintainer therapy for their children. EC Dental Sci. 2017;9:94–8.
Google Scholar
*Atchison KA, Gironda MW, Black EE, Schweitzer S, Der-Martirosian C, Felsenfeld A, Leathers R, Belin TR. Baseline characteristics and treatment preferences of oral surgery patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(12):2430–7.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
*Nair R, Yee R. Differences in willingness to pay for an extraction, a filling, and cleaning teeth at various levels of oral health-related quality of life, as measured by oral impacts on daily performance, among older adults in Singapore. Singapore Dent J. 2016;1(37):2–8.
Google Scholar
*Atanasov N, Dimitrova D, Stoyanova R, Alexandrova M, Dimova R, Lefterova B. stated preferences and willingness to pay for molar treatment: results of pilot study. Trakia J Sci. 2014;12(1):403–7.
Google Scholar
*Rosvall MD, Fields HW, Ziuchkovski J, Rosenstiel SF, Johnston WM. Attractiveness, acceptability, and value of orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;135(3):276-e1.
Article
Google Scholar
*Esfandiari S, Lund JP, Penrod JR, Savard A, Mark Thomason J, Feine JS. Implant overdentures for edentulous elders: study of patient preference. Gerodontology. 2009;26(1):3–10.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
*Fatani EJ, Al-Yousef SK. Willingness to pay for orthodontic treatment in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Riyadh Province. Saudi J Oral Sci. 2016;3(2):104.
Article
Google Scholar
*Matthews DC, Birch S, Gafni A, DiCenso A. Willingness to pay for periodontal therapy: development and testing of an instrument. J Public Health Dent. 1999;59(1):44–51.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
*Ying CK, McGrath AD, Yin MN, On LN. Willingness to pay (WTP) for root canal treatment: An economic analysis.
*Leung KC, McGrath CP. Willingness to pay for implant therapy: a study of patient preference. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2010;21(8):789–93.
Google Scholar
*Feu D, Catharino F, Duplat CB, Capelli JJ. Esthetic perception and economic value of orthodontic appliances by lay Brazilian adults. Dent Press J Orthod. 2012;17(5):102–14.
Article
Google Scholar
*Augusti D, Augusti G, Re D. Prosthetic restoration in the single-tooth gap: patient preferences and analysis of the WTP index. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2014;25(11):1257–64.
Article
Google Scholar
*Srivastava A, Feine JS, Esfandiari S. Are people who still have their natural teeth willing to pay for mandibular two-implant overdentures? J Invest Clin Dent. 2014;5(2):117–24.
Article
Google Scholar
*Moshkelgosha V, Golkari A. An evaluation of willingness to pay for orthodontic treatments in patients of Shiraz Dental School Clinic. J Oral Health Oral Epidemiol. 2015;2:35–43.
Google Scholar
*Re D, Augusti G, Battaglia D, Giannì AB, Augusti D. Is a new sonic toothbrush more effective in plaque removal than a manual toothbrush. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(1):13–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
*Re D, Ceci C, Cerutti F, Del Fabbro M, Corbella S, Taschieri S. Natural tooth preservation versus extraction and implant placement: patient preferences and analysis of the willingness to pay. Br Dent J. 2017;222(6):467.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
*Sendi P, Bertschinger N, Brand C, Marinello CP, Bucher HC, Bornstein MM. Measuring the monetary value of dental implants for denture retention: a willingness to pay approach. Open Dent J. 2017;11:498.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
*Nyamuryekung’e KK, Lahti SM, Tuominen RJ. Patients’ willingness to pay for dental services in a population with limited restorative services. Commun Dent Health. 2018;35(3):167–72.
Google Scholar
*Dalanon J, Diano LM, Esguerra R, Belarmino MP, Docor MR, Rodis OM, Locsin R, Matsuka Y. The Cebuano Mothers’ Willingness to Pay for Dental Healthcare.
Dong H, Kouyate B, Cairns J, Sauerborn R. A comparison of the reliability of the take-it-or-leave-it and the bidding game approaches to estimating willingness-to-pay in a rural population in West Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(10):2181–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Donaldson C. Eliciting patients’ values by use of ‘willingness to pay’: letting the theory drive the method. Health Expect. 2001;4(3):180–8.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Damschroder LJ, Ubel PA, Riis J, Smith DM. An alternative approach for eliciting willingness-to-pay: a randomized Internet trial.
Lin PJ, Cangelosi MJ, Lee DW, Neumann PJ. Willingness to pay for diagnostic technologies: a review of the contingent valuation literature. Value Health. 2013;16(5):797–805.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cummings RG. Valuing environmental goods. An assessment of the contingent valuation method. 1986:104–7.
List JA, Gallet CA. What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? Environ Resource Econ. 2001;20(3):241–54.
Article
Google Scholar
Little J, Berrens R. Explaining disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values: further investigation using meta-analysis. Econ Bull. 2004;3(6):1–3.
Google Scholar
Murphy JJ, Allen PG, Stevens TH, Weatherhead D. A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation. Environ Resource Econ. 2005;30(3):313–25.
Article
Google Scholar
Hausman J. Contingent valuation: from dubious to hopeless. J Econ Perspect. 2012;26(4):43–56.
Article
Google Scholar
Loomis JB. 2013 WAEA keynote address: strategies for overcoming hypothetical bias in stated preference surveys. J Agric Resour Econ. 2014;1:34–46.
Google Scholar
Kahneman D, Knetsch JL. Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. J Environ Econ Manag. 1992;22(1):57–70.
Article
Google Scholar
Bateman I, Munro A, Rhodes B, Starmer C, Sugden R. Does part–whole bias exist? An experimental investigation. Econ J. 1997;107(441):322–32.
Article
Google Scholar
Jadidfard MP, Yazdani S, Khoshnevisan MH. Developing a policy guidance for financing dental care in Iran using the RAND Appropriateness Method. Commun Dent Health. 2013;30(4):227–33.
Google Scholar