Skip to main content

Association between psychological factors and temporomandibular disorders in adolescents of rural and urban zones

Abstract

Background

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are related to psychological factors. Adolescence is one of the stages in life with more psychosocial vulnerability, which is dissimilar in rural and urban zones. Thus, the aim of this investigation was to evaluate the association between psychological factors (symptoms of anxiety, depression and somatization) and TMD in adolescents between 12 and 15 years, belonging to urban and rural zones of Colombia.

Methods

180 subjects aged 12–15 years (mean 13.8, SD 1.2), enrolled in public schools in the rural (n = 90) and urban (n = 90) zones were included. All subjects were evaluated using the DC/TMD instrument; the Axis I was applied for the clinical examination and the Axis II for the psychological evaluation. Data were analyzed by means of T-student, Mann–Whitney, Kruskall–Wallis tests, Pearson Chi square and multiple-variable analysis with logistic regression.

Results

Forty percent of the included subjects presented some type of TMD. TMD related to pain were the most common (25.5% of the studied adolescents), being myalgia the most common (20% of the adolescents in urban zone and 31.1% of the adolescents in the rural zone). There was no difference between the TMD present in males and females, but there were differences in the symptoms of Anxiety, and Somatization (p < 0.05). TMD and psychological factors were more prevalent in children with 13 years of age. A statistically significant association between TMD and symptoms of Anxiety (Pearson Chi squared 25.57, p = 0.04), depression (Pearson Chi squared 33.28, p = 0.03) and somatization (Pearson Chi squared 25.79, p = 0.04) was found in subjects from rural zones. No associations between psychological aspects and TMD were found in subjects from urban zones, but overall all psychological factors significantly influenced TMD.

Conclusion

This study indicates Myalgia to be the most prevalent TMD in studied Colombian adolescents. Pain-related TMDs are associated with psychological factors in the adolescent population of rural Colombia. Symptoms of anxiety, depression and somatization were found to be associated to TMD, even when the frequency was not necessarily severe.

Peer Review reports

Background

According to the American Academy of Orofacial Pain, TMD is defined as a collection of medical and dental conditions affecting the (TMJ) and/or the muscles of mastication, as well as contiguous tissue components [1]. They occur between 7 and 30% of adolescents [2, 3]; being diagnoses related to pain (Myalgia, Miofascial pain, Referred Myofascial Pain, Arthralgia and Headache attributed to TMD) more common than intra-articular disorders [3]. In fact, TMD pain-related frequently causes disability [4]. In Colombia, these data are not available, since the study of TMD was excluded from the National Oral Health Study (ENSAB) IV [5] and no validated tools have been used to make reliable diagnoses.

The pain caused by TMD is considered chronic [6, 7]. According to the categorization of pain included in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11, to be classified as chronic, pain should affect one or more regions, be persistent and affect the daily functioning of the person [8]. Chronic pain (including those inherent in TMD) is closely related to psychological factors [9, 10], which appear to be common in adolescence [11].

According to UNICEF data [12], about 20% of teenagers worldwide have mental or behavioral problems. Depression is the disease that contributes the most to the global burden of morbidity of 15–19 years-old people [12]. Mental problems of young people who do not receive assistance, are associated with poor results in education, unemployment, drug use, violence, crimes and irresponsible sexual and reproductive activity. All these factors increase the risks of neuropsychiatric diseases [13] and mental disorders such as depression and schizophrenia [14]. The mental health problems of adolescents entail high social and economic costs because, as time passes, they can generate disabilities [12].

A high rate of Colombian adolescents (19.8%) [15], has been subjected to conditions that involve fear, affliction, violence [16,17,18], and educational inequality [19], among others. These situations cause this population to have a high risk of depression and somatization [12, 20], psychological conditions that are related to TMD [21]. Because social conditions are different in urban and rural zones of Colombia [17, 19], it is reasonable to think that there are differences in the association between psychological factors and TMD between both populations.

Although the mental health law in Colombia [20], protects children and adolescents as a priority, living in a society that is still considered violent for most adolescents, has consequences not only on mental health, but also on physical health. Therefore, the research question was; Is there an association between psychological factors and TMD in adolescents of Colombian rural and urban zones? To solve it, the objective of this study was to evaluate the association between psychological factors (symptoms of anxiety, depression and somatization) and TMD in adolescents between 12 and 15 years, belonging to urban and rural zones of Antioquia, Colombia.

Methods

Design

A cross-sectional study was conducted.

Population and sample

Adolescents of both genders between 12 and 15 years, were included in the study. Subjects belong to the only public school with middle and high school grades of the Municipality of Fredonia (rural zone) and a public school of the Municipality of Medellín (urban zone), which was randomly chosen from the group of educational institutions attached to the Secretary of Education of Medellin, Colombia (https://www.datos.gov.co/Educaci-n/Directorio-Establecimientos-Educativos-Municipio-d/pjcr-m27u). The school was selected by an official of the Secretary of Education, which was not participating in the study.

The sample calculation was performed in Epidat, version 4.0, taking into account a population of 250 adolescents between 12 and 15 years in each educational institution to be evaluated (according to data from the Ministry of National Education of Colombia). The power was set in 90% and the margin of error in 5%. With an expected proportion of psychological factors in adolescents with TMD of 31.1 [22], the sample size needed was 150 subjects; but with an expected proportion of TMD in adolescents of 35.9 in urban area and 38.5 in rural area [22], the total sample was 180 subjects. It was decided to take the highest number of individuals required in the calculation. Thus, 90 students from Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia (urban zone) and 90 students from Fredonia, Antioquia, Colombia (rural zone) were included. Subjects were chosen at random, using the skipped list method two by two, based on the students enrolled in each of the institutions. The participants were not matched by age or gender.

Inclusion criteria were adolescents assisting to one of the institutions of the Colombian educative system. Exclusion criteria were malformations in the face or cervical spine (known by the parents or the subject), cleft lip and palate or syndromes affecting morphology or facial function. Data were collected between February and November 2018.

Clinical evaluation of temporomandibular disorders

All subjects were evaluated using the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) [23], in its Spanish version [24], which is the reference standard for the diagnosis of TMD. In the case of the clinical examination, Axis I was used, which consists of a questionnaire of symptoms and subsequently a detailed examination of the muscles and the TMJ, at rest and function. In this examination, an evaluation is carried out on the patient, following already determined commands related to pain location, headache location, incisal relations, opening pattern, opening movement, laterality and protrusion movements, articular noises during the movement of opening and closing the mouth, joint block and muscle pain on palpation. For this last point, an algometer (LACA®121442) was used to standardize the pressure applied in each of the bands of the Temporal (anterior, middle and posterior) and Masseter (origin, middle and insertion) muscles. With the diagnostic tree, the route is followed to obtain the diagnosis or diagnoses related to pain or intra-articular disorders. The sensitivity of the instrument is ≥ 0.86 and 0.80 respectively for TMD related to pain and intra-articular disorders. The specificity is ≥ 0.98 for pain diagnoses and 0.97 for intra-articular ones. The exam was conducted within the educational institutions of Medellín and Fredonia, in an office, with the participants sitting in a school chair and with their heads on a wall. One examiner performed the clinical evaluation and another was the scorer. Both of them were previously calibrated both to perform the clinical evaluation and to fill the score sheets (Please see the error of method section).

Psychological assessment

The psychological factors of the rural and urban regions were analyzed in advance, to guarantee there were differences between the urban and rural zones. Data were obtained from official statistics of the Colombian government, which are presented in Table 1 [25, 26]. Except for the percentage of people treated for mental and behavioral disorders, due to use of psychoactive substances, the other analyzed statistics, showed a more adverse psychological environment in the rural zone than in the urban zone. For the evaluation of psychological factors associated with TMD in the study population, Axis II of the DC/TMD [23] was used. With instruments validated for adolescents included in Axis II, the symptoms of anxiety [27, 28], depression [29, 30] and somatization [31, 32] were assessed. The Axis II instruments were applied during a school day, in the classroom of the educational institutions located in the urban and rural zones.

Table 1 Psychosocial aspects in the population of Fredonia (rural zone) and Medellín (urban zone). Data 2017

Error of method

In March 2017, calibration was performed for the use of the DC/TMD Axis I. In the calibration, a member of the International Network for Orofacial Pain and Related Disorders (INfORM) consortium participated as a reference standard, who is an official calibrator for the instrument and researcher of this study (CR). Initially, a two-day course was held for instructional and practical sessions. For the two-day session, the subsequent steps were followed: In a first session, a detailed explanation of the Axis I of the DC/TMD was made, using an instructional document and a video. Subsequently, the reference examiner (CR), performed the detailed examination to one of the researchers to be calibrated (AMO), who acted as a patient. Meanwhile, the other researcher watched (ACH) and acted as a scorer. The procedure was repeated for the other investigator. During this practice, immediate and detailed feedback was delivered. In the second session, the researchers conducted the exam with each other, with feedback from the reference investigator (CR). The third and fourth sessions included 18 patients (10 with some type of TMD and 8 controls), which were evaluated by CR and the two investigators (AMO and ACH). The data were recorded in a standardized database in Excel data were analyzed in STATA (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). The Kappa values obtained for the researchers were 0.85 and 0.88 respectively. For the evaluation of symptoms of depression, somatization and anxiety, already validated instruments were used, which are self-responding and do not require examiner calibration (they were mentioned in the psychological factors section of the methodology).

Statistical analysis

All the data obtained in the exams were recorded in a digital database in Excel. In order to verify the quality of the records, 5% of the data of the subjects included in the sample were randomly assessed, in order to establish the degree of agreement between data manually recorded with Axes I and II of the DC/TMD and the data registered in the database. The data were accepted when there was a 99% or higher agreement. Frequencies were obtained for each of the variables evaluated. Operationalization and type of variables are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Operationalization and type of variables included in the investigation

Kolmogorov–Smirnov was used to test the normality of the variables age group and the psychological aspects (anxiety, depression and somatization).

TMD diagnoses and psychological factors were compared between males and females by means of Fisher and Pearson Chi-square tests and between rural and urban zones with the Pearson Chi squared test.

Differences of TMD diagnoses and psychological factors among age groups were assessed using Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post-hoc tests.

Finally, presence of TMD and presence of Pain-related TMD were taken as dependent variables for two multiple-variable analyses. Zone (urban or rural) and the psychological variables (symptoms of anxiety, depression and somatization) were included as independent variables.

Data were analyzed in STATA (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). The results were considered significant when p value was < 0.05.

Results

A total of 180 adolescents between 12 and 15 years (average 13.8, SD 1.2) were included in this study. In the rural zone, 90 subjects participated (41 male and 49 female; average age 14.2 years; SD 0.8). In the urban zone, the 90 subjects were 33 male and 57 female, with an average age of 13.5 years; SD 1.3). There were no losses due to lack of information in the instruments or due to withdrawals from the investigation. Forty percent of the subjects presented some type of TMD. TMD related to pain predominated (Table 3). Of the intra-articular disorders, there were only 5 cases of disc displacement with reduction.

Table 3 Age, gender and prevalence of Temporomandibular Disorders in the total sample, and rural and urban zone

There was no difference between the TMD present in males and females. Regarding the psychological factors, 43.33% of adolescents having symptoms of anxiety higher than “no-minimum” were females and differences were statistically significant between genders. Somatization was higher in males than females (p = 0.001) and there were no differences between genders, when comparing depression (Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of temporomandibular disorders and psychological aspects between males and females

TMD disorders were more prevalent in children with 13 years of age, whilst psychological factors were present in all age groups (Table 5). Statistically significant differences among groups were found only for Myalgia in the case of TMD, where Post-Hoc test indicated the difference to be located between the groups with 14 and 15 years of age. In the case of psychological factors, statistically significant differences were found for symptoms of Anxiety and Depression (p < 0.05). In the case of Anxiety, the difference was located between adolescents with 12 and 14 years. In the case of Depression, the difference was between adolescents with 12 and 13 years of age (Table 6).

Table 5 Comparison of temporomandibular disorders and psychological aspects among age groups. Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post-hoc test
Table 6 Association between psychosocial factors and temporomandibular disorders in the total sample

Symptoms of anxiety and somatization were more frequent in adolescents with myalgia than with other diagnoses, while adolescents with disk displacement with reduction presented greater depression (Table 7). The frequency of symptoms of anxiety, depression and somatization in subjects with myofascial pain, arthralgia and headache was low (Table 4), even when the associations between anxiety (Fisher 25.57, p = 0.04), depression (Fisher 29.23, p = 0.03) and somatization (Fisher 25.79, p = 0.04) and TMD were statistically significant (Table 6). All associations were found in the rural zone (Table 7).

Table 7 Prevalence of psychosocial factors in the urban and rural zone. Association with temporomandibular disorders

The final models for multiple logistic regression were constructed with all the variables included in the multivariate analysis. In the final models, the Nagelkerke coefficient (measurement obtained with the logistic regression to determine the reliability of the variables included in the model to explain the phenomenon (TMD)), presented a value of 0.39 for model 1 and 0.56 for model 2, which showed that 39% and 56% of the differences between groups could be respectively explained by the variables included in the models (p = 0.008 for model 1 and 0.002 for model 2). The Hosmer–Lemershow test assessed goodness-of-fit of the variables of the model and gave a statistical value for the chi-squared of 9.76 with p = 0.34 for model 1 and 8.31 with p = 0.26, suggesting that the variables contained in the models adequately explained the findings of the analysis.

The multiple-variable analysis with logistic regression, showed living in rural zone, symptoms of anxiety, depression and somatization to have statistically significant association (p < 0.05) as associated factors with TMD (OR > 1), and specifically for pain TMD (OR > 2.3) (Table 8).

Table 8 Association of psychosocial factors with TMD and pain-related TMD in Colombian Adolescents

Discussion

The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between psychological factors (symptoms of anxiety, depression and somatization) and TMD in adolescents between 12 and 15 years, belonging to urban and rural zones of Antioquia, Colombia. The main findings were: (1) 40% of adolescents presented some type of TMD; (2) Pain-related diagnoses (Myalgia, Miofascial Pain, Referred Miofascial Pain, Arthralgia and Headache attributed to TMD) were more common than intra-articular ones (Disc Displacement with Reduction was the only found); (3) There was no difference between the TMD present in females and males, but symptoms of Anxiety were higher in females than males and somatization was higher in males than in females. All TMD and psychological factors were more prevalent in 13 year-old adolescents; (3) An association was found between psychological factors (symptoms of Anxiety, Depression and Somatization) and TMD in adolescents from rural zones and overall, all the studied psychological factors were associated with TMD.

The frequency of TMD in adolescents, described in studies conducted in different regions of the world, varies between 20 and 46.1% [33,34,35,36]. Among these, the studies carried out in South America, have found a frequency of TMD of 46.1% [36], which is slightly higher than that found in this study. As in the available evidence, the results of this research indicate higher prevalence of pain-related disorders than articular disorders [9]. Despite this similarity, there are some differences when comparing the results of this research with those of other studies. Myalgia and Headache attributed to TMD were the most frequent diagnoses in adolescents included in this study (25.5% and 6.11%, respectively). However, systematic reviews and previous cross-sectional studies, have indicated Myofascial Pain as the most prevalent diagnosis [2, 3, 35, 36]. In this investigation, only two cases were found; one with a diagnosis of Myofascial Pain and another with Referred Myofascial pain. In Myofascial Pain, unlike Myalgia or Headache attributed to TMD, the symptomatology is induced from trigger point pressure, it is located in regions (not in specific points) and in many cases refers to other regions [37]. In Myalgia or Headache Attributed to TMD, pain is not referred and occurs at specific points.

Although evaluating heritable conditions of the population, was not an objective of this study, certain genetic characteristics in Americans and Europeans have been identified in the literature as associated with Myofascial Pain [38]. Genetics could be the explanation about why Myofascial Pain is more common in caucasic populations (Europeans and Americans) than in the population studied in this investigation (latin-american adolescents). However, the same genetic conditions are to be studied in Colombia and maybe other latin-american countries to improve the knowledgment on the field.

TMD are highly related to psychological factors [39, 40]. This was confirmed in this study, where OR values showed statistically significant influence of symptoms of anxiety, depression and somatization on TMD and where all TMD diagnoses were found associated with each of the studied psychological factors. The psychological conditions have shown to be different between urban and rural zones, not only in Colombia [41, 42], but also in other regions of the world [43]. The influence of psychological factors on TMD in Colombia, may have different conditions compared to other countries, from a demographic point of view. For instance, the Human Development Index (HDI) [44] in Colombia, shows that rural municipalities are much poorer than those located in the urban zone; not only in economic terms, but also in opportunities. The global HDI in Colombia is 0.74; However, in the rural zone, it is between 0.50 and 0.65 [44], an important difference with other countries in conflict, where the HDI is almost the same for both zones [44].

Situations such as fear, affliction, social disorder, educational inequality, consumption of psychoactive substances or lack of opportunities, are different when rural zones are compared with urban zones in Colombia [45] and could be affecting the HDI. In the case of the rural zone, the family environment, access to basic health services and demographic isolation, among others, can have a negative influence on the mental health of adolescents [3, 15, 20]. Despite this reality, in the authors' knowledge, this is the first study that evaluates the association between psychological factors and TMD in rural and urban zones.

Looking inside each of the psychological factors studied in the present study, there is an evidence on the relationship between depression and somatization and chronic pain related to TMD [46]. This finding has also been reported in adolescents [47]. Another previous study, also observed the presence of depression in 44% and somatization in 74.1% of subjects of all ages with TMD [48]. These values are higher than those found in the present study (39.13% and 32.61%, respectively for depression and somatization). However, when comparing the results of this research with those of studies in adolescents with TMD, the percentages of depression and somatization are lower (10.94% and 10.64% respectively), even when compared with results obtained also in Latin populations [49]. Regarding symptoms of anxiety, the relationship found here with TMD, was previously found by other authors [50, 51]. It was not possible to make this same comparison between rural and urban populations, since no data were found in the literature.

Physical, psychological, social and hormonal changes, typical of adolescence, contribute to increasing vulnerability to psychiatric disorders such as anxiety and depression, and making adolescents more susceptible to muscle and / or joint disorders [47]. In fact, TMD related to pain can be modified with menstrual cycles in women [52]. The median age of females when they have their first period or menarche is around 12 years of age in US [53] and Colombian girls [54]. Hormonal fluctuations have an effect on the intensity of pain [52] and on the psychological conditions of adolescents [55]. In this study, TMD didn´t present statistically significant differences between males and females. However, the design of this study does not allow to establish a cause-effect relationship between menstrual cycle and pain TMD disorders and/or psychological changes. To reach this type of conclusions, it is necessary to carry out future investigations, with cohorts followed in the long term and paired by gender and age; that allow to determine the association of gender with TMD.

Although the progress of TMD was not an objective of this study, it is important to follow up on cohorts to determine the long-term effect of psychological factors on the severity of TMD in Colombia. The reason is the evidence that demonstrates that psychological deterioration increases the severity and persistence of clinical symptoms related to TMD [56], which affects the quality of life [57, 58], and general health [56].

The results of this study will provide a starting point to determine psychological patterns that may be subject to research to prevent and treat TMD in adolescents and prevent future disabilities. The DC/TMD was validated for several diagnoses and achieved in some cases very high levels of sensitivity and specificity, showing good diagnostic accuracy for TMD in adults. The DC/TMD was developed exclusively in adults and still there is no other validated instrument as good as DC/TMD to TMD diagnosis for adolescents. For this reason, it was decided to use the standard of reference instrument, as has been used in other studies, even when being aware of the limitation [59]. Another limitation of this investigation is the type of sample, which was not paired by gender and the cross-section, which does not allow establishing the associations found as cause or effect. Therefore, it would be important to conduct interdisciplinary research that allows comparing the findings and that involves a sufficient sample to achieve generalization of the results in the Colombian population, as well as designs that allow determining the cause-effect relationship that may exist between psychological factors, demographics and TMD.

Conclusion

This study indicates Myalgia to be the most prevalent TMD in Colombian adolescents. Pain-related TMDs are associated with psychological factors in the adolescent population of rural Colombia. Symptoms of anxiety, depression and somatization were found to be associated to TMD, even when the frequency was not necessarily severe.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

TMD:

Temporomandibular disorders

DC/TMD:

Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders

TMJ:

Temporomandibular Joint

ENSAB:

Estudio Nacional de Salud Bucal (spanish)

CNHS:

Colombian National Health Study

ICD:

International Classification of Diseases

CR:

Claudia Restrepo

AMO:

Ana Maria Ortiz

ACH:

Ana Carolina Henao

HDI:

Human Development Index

References

  1. 1.

    American Academy of Orofacial Pain. Orofacial Pain Guidelines: for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management. 6th edition. (de Leeuw R, Klasser G, eds.). New York: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2018.

  2. 2.

    da Silva CG, Pachêco-Pereira C, Porporatti AL, Savi MG, Peres MA, Flores-Mir C, Canto GL. Prevalence of clinical signs of intra-articular temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147:10–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Christidis N, Lindström Ndanshau E, Sandberg A, Tsilingaridis G. Prevalence and treatment strategies regarding temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents—a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46:291–301.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gil-Martínez A, Grande-Alonso M, López-de-Uralde-Villanueva I, López-López A, Fernández-Carnero J, La Touche R. Chronic temporomandibular disorders: disability, pain intensity and fear of movement. J Headache Pain. 2016;17:103–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    ENSAB IV. Situación bucal actual en Colombia. In: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/PP/ENSAB-IV-Situacion-Bucal-Actual.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.

  6. 6.

    Dworkin SF, Massoth DL. Temporomandibular disorders and chronic pain: disease or illness? J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:29–38.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ohrbach R, Dworkin SF. AAPT diagnostic criteria for chronic painful temporomandibular disorders. J Pain. 2019;20:1276–92.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, et al. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain. 2015;156:1003–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Liossi C, Howard RF. Pediatric chronic pain: biopsychosocial assessment and formulation. Pediatrics. 2016;138:e20160331.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    De La Torre CG, Câmara-Souza MB, Muñoz Lora VRM, Guarda-Nardini L, Conti PCR, Rodrigues Garcia RM, Del Bel Cury AA, Manfredini D. Prevalence of psychosocial impairment in temporomandibular disorder patients: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45:881–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Song YL, Yap AU, Türp JC. Association between temporomandibular disorders and pubertal development: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45:1007–15.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Increase in child and adolescent mental disorders spurs new push for action by UNICEF and WHO. In https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/increase-child-and-adolescent-mental-disorders-spurs-new-push-action-unicef-and-who. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.

  13. 13.

    Gore FM, Bloem PJ, Patton GC, et al. Global burden of disease in young people aged 10–24 years: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011;377:2093–102.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Benjet C, Bromet E, Karam EG, et al. The epidemiology of traumatic event exposure worldwide: results from the World Mental Health Survey Consortium. Psychol Med. 2016;46:327–43.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Brook DW, Brook JS, Rosen Z, De La Rosa M, Montoya ID, Whiteman M. Early risk factors for violence in Colombian adolescents. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:1470–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Informe anual de UNICEF Colombia. In: https://www.unicef.org.co/informe2017/es/pdf.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.

  17. 17.

    Brook JS, Brook DW, Whiteman M. Growing up in a violent society: longitudinal predictors of violence in Colombian adolescents. Am J Community Psychol. 2007;40:82–95.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cuartas J, Roy AL. The latent threat of community violence: indirect exposure to local homicides and Adolescents’ mental health in Colombia. Am J Community Psychol. 2019;64:218–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ramos R, Duque JC, Nieto S. Decomposing the rural-urban differential in student achievement in Colombia using PISA Microdata. Estudios de Economía Aplicada. 2016;34:379–412.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chaskel R, Gaviria SL, Espinel Z, Taborda E, Vanegas R, Shultz JM. Mental health in Colombia. BJPsych Int. 2015;12:95–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Magalhães BG, de Sousa ST, de Mello VV, da Silva-Barbosa AC, de Assis-morais MP, Barbosa-Vasconcelos MM, Caldas-Júnior AD. Risk factors for temporomandibular disorder: binary logistic regression analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19:232–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Marpaung C, van Selms MKA, Lobbezoo F. Prevalence and risk indicators of pain-related temporomandibular disorders among Indonesian children and adolescents. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018;46(4):400–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, List T, Svensson P, Gonzalez Y, Lobbezoo F, Michelotti A, Brooks SL, Ceusters W, Drangsholt M, Ettlin D, Gaul C, Goldberg LJ, Haythornthwaite JA, Hollender L, Jensen R, John MT, De Laat A. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28:6–27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Orbach R. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders:Assessment Instruments (Spanish). In: https://buffalo.app.box.com/s/u9jd6bzk7sfai7o6wxwvsjchgtyu4zvh. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.

  25. 25.

    Sistema de indicadores de Antioquia. In http://mapas.antioquia.gov.co/indicadores/indicador.hyg?grupo=2&tema=232&indicador=647. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.

  26. 26.

    Observatorio de Salud Mental en Colombia. http://rssvr2.sispro.gov.co/ObsSaludMental/. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.

  27. 27.

    Spitzer RL, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1092–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mossman SA, Luft MJ, Schroeder HK, et al. The generalized anxiety disorder 7-item scale in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder: signal detection and validation. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2017;29:227–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kroenke K, et al. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;16:606–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Borghero F, Martínez V, Zitko P, Vöhringer PA, Cavada G, Rojas G. Tamizaje de episodio depresivo en adolescentes. Validación del instrumento PHQ-9 [Screening depressive episodes in adolescents. validation of the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)]. Rev Med Chil. 2018;146:479–86.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kroenke K, et al. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:258–66.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kocalevent RD, Hinz A, Brähler E. Standardization of a screening instrument (PHQ-15) for somatization syndromes in the general population. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Feteih RM. Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and oral parafunctions in urban Saudi Arabian adolescents: a research report. Head Face Med. 2006;2:25–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Farsi NM. Symptoms and signs of temporomandibular disorders and oral parafunctions among Saudi children. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:1200–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Verdonck A, Takada K, Kitai N, Kuriama R, Yasuda Y, Carels C, Sakuda M. The prevalence of cardinal TMJ dysfunction symptoms and its relationship to occlusal factors in Japanese female adolescents. J Oral Rehabil. 1994;21:687–97.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Casanova-Rosado JF, Medina-Solis CE, Vallejos-Sanchez AA, Casanova- Rosado AJ, Hernandez-Prado B, Avila-Burgos L. Prevalence and associated factors for temporomandibular disorders in a group of Mexican adolescents and youth adults. Clin Oral Investig. 2006;10:42–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Malik KM, Beckerly R, Imani F (2018) Musculoskeletal disorders a universal source of pain and disability misunderstood and mismanaged: a critical analysis based on the U.S. model of care. Anesth Pain Med 8:e85532.

  38. 38.

    Slade GD, Conrad MS, Diatchenko L, Rashid NU, Zhong S, Smith S, Rhodes J, Medvedev A, Makarov S, Maixner W, et al. Cytokine biomarkers and chronic pain: association of genes, transcription, and circulating proteins with temporomandibular disorders and widespread palpation tenderness. Pain. 2011;152:2802–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Marpaung C, Lobbezoo F, van Selms MKA. Temporomandibular Disorders among Dutch adolescents: prevalence and biological, psychological, and social risk indicators. Pain Res Manag. 2018:5053709.

  40. 40.

    Karibe H, Shimazu K, Okamoto A, Kawakami T, Kato Y, Warita-Naoi S. Prevalence and association of self-reported anxiety, pain, and oral parafunctional habits with temporomandibular disorders in Japanese children and adolescents: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:8–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Vallejo K, Tapias J, Arroyave I. Trends of rural/urban homicide in Colombia, 1992–2015: internal armed conflict and hints for postconflict. Biomed Res Int. 2018;201:6120909.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Herrera L, Buitrago R, Lorenzo O, Badea M. Socio-emotional intelligence in colombian children of primary education. An analysis in rural and urban settings. Procedia Social Behav Sci. 2015;203:4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Peen J, Schoevers RA, Beekman AT, Dekker J. The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010;121:84–93.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Human Development Index. Human Development Data (1990–2018). In http://hdr.undp.org/en/data. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.

  45. 45.

    United Nations. Human Development Report. Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: Inequalities in Human Development in the 21st Century. 2019. In: http://report.hdr.undp.org/. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.

  46. 46.

    Sruthi S, Jimsha VK, Srinivasan SV, Daniel JM. Prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress in chronic temporomandibular joint disorders patients. J Depress Anxiety. 2018;7:322–7.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fernandes G, van Selms MK, Gonçalves DA, Lobbezoo F, Camparis CM. Factors associated with temporomandibular disorders pain in adolescents. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42:113–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sójka A, Stelcer B, Roy M, Mojs E, Pryliński M. Is there a relationship between psychological factors and TMD? Brain Behav. 2019;9:e01360.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Pereira LJ, Pereira-Cenci T, Pereira SM, et al. Psychological factors and the incidence of temporomandibular disorders in early adolescence. Braz Oral Res. 2009;23:155–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    de Paiva Bertoli FM, Bruzamolin CD, de Almeida Kranz GO, Losso EM, Brancher JA, de Souza JF. Anxiety and malocclusion are associated with temporomandibular disorders in adolescents diagnosed by RDC/TMD. A cross-sectional study. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45:747–55.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kobayashi FY, Gavião MBD, Marquezin MCS, et al. Salivary stress biomarkers and anxiety symptoms in children with and without temporomandibular disorders. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:e78.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Smith YR, Stohler CS, Nichols TE, Bueller JA, Koeppe RA, Zubieta JK. Pronociceptive and antinociceptive effects of es-tradiol through endogenous opioid neurotransmission in women. J Neurosci. 2006;26:5777–85.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Chumlea WE, Schubert CM, Roche AF, et al. Age at menarche and racial comparisons in US girls. Pediatrics. 2003;111:110–3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Jansen EC, Herrán OF, Villamor E. Trends and correlates of age at menarche in Colombia: Results from a nationally representative survey. Econ Hum Biol. 2015;19:138–44.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ladouceur CD, Kerestes R, Schlund MW, Shirtcliff EA, Lee Y, Dahl RE. Neural systems underlying reward cue processing in early adolescence: the role of puberty and pubertal hormones. J Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2019;102:281–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Canales GT, Guarda-Nardini L, Rizzatti-Barbosa CM, Conti P, Manfredini D. Distribution of depression, somatization and pain-related impairment in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorders. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;7:27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    da Silva MF, Vedovello SAS, Vedovello Filho M, Venezian GC, Valdrighi HC, Degan VV. Temporomandibular disorders and quality of life among 12-year-old schoolchildren. Cranio. 2017;35:392–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Bitiniene D, Zamaliauskiene R, Kubilius R, Leketas M, Gailius T, Smirnovaite K. Quality of life in patients with temporomandibular disorders. A systematic review. Stomatologija. 2018;20:3–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Bertoli FMP, Bruzamolin CD, Pizzatto E, Losso EM, Brancher JA, de Souza JF. Prevalence of diagnosed temporomandibular disorders: a cross-sectional study in Brazilian adolescents. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0192254.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the directors of the schools where the study was performed.

Funding

This investigation was fully funded by Universidad CES.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CR conceived the project, CR, AMO and ACH wrote the project, CR performed the calibration to AMO and ACH, AMO and ACH performed the measurements, CR was involved in planning and supervised the work, RM processed the data, and performed the analysis. CR, AMO, ACH and RM interpreted the results and worked on the manuscript. CR, AMO, ACH and RM drafted the manuscript and designed the tables. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Restrepo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of Universidad CES (File 127). The parents signed the informed consent and the adolescents the assent to participate in the study. According to Colombian legislation, all subjects were evaluated by a psychologist to guarantee their reasoning, understanding and logic to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Restrepo, C., Ortiz, A.M., Henao, A.C. et al. Association between psychological factors and temporomandibular disorders in adolescents of rural and urban zones. BMC Oral Health 21, 140 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01485-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Temporomandibular disorders
  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • Somatization
  • Rural
  • Urban