Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association of salivary Cathepsin B in different histological grades among patients presenting with oral squamous cell carcinoma

BMC Oral Health volume 22, Article number: 63 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Oral cancer is considered a major public health problem due to its high mortality and morbidity rates. Survival rate of OSCC can be significantly improved by using non-invasive tool such as salivary biomarkers for detection of OSCC which is considered a promising approach. Cathepsin B is a lysosomal cysteine protease, present in abundant quantities in lysosome of cells, tissues and different biological fluids. Increased expression of Cathepsin B was observed in many malignancies including oral cancer. The present study was designed to determine the salivary levels of Cathepsin B in different histological grades of OSCC.

Method

In this study, total no. of 80 research participants were enrolled which were divided into four groups. Each group comprised 20 participants, group 1 comprised 20 patients of OSCC (well differentiated), group 2 comprised 20 patients of OSCC (moderately differentiated), group 3 comprised 20 patients of OSCC (poorly differentiated) and group 4 comprised 20 healthy controls. Saliva sample was collected from all the four study groups and salivary Cathepsin B levels were analyzed by ELISA sandwich technique in duplicate.

Results

Salivary levels of Cathepsin B were significantly increased with p value (< 0.001) in patients of OSCC as compared to control group according to both histological grades and tumor size. Highest mean Cathepsin B levels in well differentiated OSCC followed by poorly differentiated OSCC and moderately differentiated OSCC were observed.

Conclusion

Results of the present study suggests that Cathepsin B has a great value as a salivary biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of OSCC in different histological grades. This will further lead to increase survival rate and improve the prognosis of OSCC.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Oral cancer is a malignant neoplasm which is considered as a major and alarming health problem of global concern due to increasing prevalence and high mortality rate [1]. It is the sixth most common and leading cause of mortality worldwide and ranked as the 2nd most common cancer in Pakistan [2, 3]. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common and frequent type of oral cancer which accounts for approximately 90% of all oral cancers [4, 5]. Annual incidence rate of oral cancer is 300,000 cases and mortality rate is 145,000 cases worldwide approximately [6]. Most common sites of OSCC occurrence are buccal mucosa, tongue and floor of the mouth [7]. The most important and prevalent risk factors for development of OSCC are tobacco, alcohol and smokeless tobacco chewing [8]. The other risk factors include: viral infections HPV16 and HPV18, genetic factors, occupational exposure, ultraviolent radiation and nutritional deficiencies due to low consumption of fruits and vegetables [9]. The main treatment modalities currently available for OSCC are surgical excision, radiotherapy and chemotherapy [10].

In spite of the advancement in treatment regimens, the 5-year survival rate of OSCC is found to be less than 50% [11]. Although examination of oral cavity is easily assessable but most OSCC are still diagnosed in an advanced stages [12]. Currently, gold standard for the diagnosis of OSCC is histopathological examination of a biopsy sample [13]. However, biopsy is an invasive procedure and has various drawbacks such as painful, high cost and fear of cancer spread after performing biopsy which results in late diagnosis of OSCC [14]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify new non-invasive methods which will help us in diagnosis and monitoring of OSCC [15]. Salivary biomarkers are considered a promising and ideal tool in this regard for diagnosis and monitoring of OSCC [16]. Using saliva as a diagnostic tool has several advantages like collection of saliva is simple, safe, non-invasive in nature and cost effective. It also has benefits of ease in sampling, handling and processing [17, 18]. Furthermore, due to direct contact between saliva and oral cavity salivary biomarkers are considered a perfect and classic tool for diagnosis and monitoring of OSCC [19]. Several salivary biomarkers in oral squamous cell carcinoma have been identified which can be used as diagnostic and prognostic markers in OSCC [20].

Cathepsin B (CTSB) is a lysosomal cysteine protease and belongs to a family of cysteine cathepsins. It is present in abundant quantities in lysosomes of cells and different biological fluids of body such as saliva and serum [21]. Main physiological function of Cathepsin B is intracellular degradation and turnover of proteins [22]. Cathepsin B plays a major and important role in development of cancer and its progression. It is associated with basement membrane dissolution and extracellular matrix degradation, a process responsible for tumor progression, growth, metastasis and invasion [23]. Its expression in tissues and serum levels was increased in many types of malignancies including OSCC [24]. However, previously none of the studies have reported Cathepsin B levels in saliva in patients of OSCC in different histological grades. Therefore, analyzing Cathepsin B levels in saliva might be beneficial in diagnosis and monitoring of OSCC by using non-invasive technique. This will lead to increase survival rate and further improve the prognosis of the disease.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted during the period of July 2019 to December 2019 after approval from Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Dow University of Health Sciences (IRB-1223/DUHS/Approval/2019/34). The recruitment of study participants for OSCC was carried out at dental OPD of Dow University of Health Sciences. Recruitment of control group participants was carried out from patient’s attendant’s, friends, family and colleagues. Informed consent in written was obtained from each research participants.

Sample size estimation

The power of the test was calculated to justify the sample size of 20 subjects in each group using PASS version 15 software, based on One-way ANOVA with 95% confidence of interval, 1.30 standard deviation of means, 2.08 standard deviation of Cathepsin B. It was achieved more than 99%.

Study groups

Total no. of 80 research participants were enrolled in our study which were divided into four groups 20 in each group. Group 1 consists of 20 patients of well differentiated OSCC, group 2 consists of 20 patients of moderately differentiated OSCC, group 3 consists of 20 patients of poorly differentiated OSCC and group 4 consists of 20 healthy controls. Inclusion criteria for OSCC patients includes: patients of OSCC of both genders, aged 18–65, newly diagnosed and biopsy proven were selected. OSCC patients were divided respectively into three groups i.e., well, moderate and poorly differentiated according to Broder’s histopathological grading criteria. Patients with underlying systemic illness such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, pancreatitis, chronic atrophic gastritis, periodontitis, other malignant tumors such as breast, ovary, lung, gastric and nasopharyngeal were excluded. Patients with a history of smoking and smokeless tobacco products were excluded from the control group. In a pre-designed questionnaire demographic data, type, frequency, duration of chewing habits and site of lesion was obtained for each research participant of OSCC.

Saliva collection method

In a sterilized falcon tube of 15 ml, 2–5 ml of unstimulated whole saliva was collected from each research participant between 9 and 11 am. Participants were asked to refrain from eating, chewing and drinking one hour prior to saliva sample collection. After that, saliva samples were immediately taken to laboratory and centrifuged for 15 min, 4 °C at 8000 rpm. Saliva supernatant was collected, aliquoted into 1.5 ml of eppendorf tubes and stored at − 80 °C until further processing of saliva.

Sample analysis

Total protein estimation analysis was performed according to Bradford’s method [26]. Salivary levels of Cathepsin B in all the four study groups were determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) sandwich technique according to manufacturer’s instructions available in the kit (Bioassay Technology KIT: 35054Hu). Each sample was analyzed in duplicates for better result outcomes.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of all the obtained data was performed by SPSS version no 26. For all quantitative variables, mean and standard deviation were calculated and for all categorical variables, percentages and frequencies were calculated. Kruskal–Wallis test was used for comparison of salivary Cathepsin B levels between three study groups of OSCC and control group. For pair wise comparison, between three groups of OSCC and control group Post Hoc (Dunnett’s test) was used. For patient related factors, association between three OSCC groups and control group Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used. For univariate and multivariate analysis, linear regression was used as the outcome variable Cathepsin B follows a continuous scale. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the cut-off values of Cathepsin B for calculating sensitivity and specificity.

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics of all 80 research participants enrolled in our study are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Among the total 60 patients of OSCC, male patients comprised 43 (71.66%) and female patients comprised 17 (28.3%) cases. The male to female ratio observed was 2.5:1. With respect to age, the mean age of 80 research participants was 43.75 ± 11.83 with the minimum 19 years of age and maximum 65 years of age were observed. The most common site found in our study among three groups of OSCC was buccal mucosa 31 cases, followed by tongue 10 cases, retromolar area 5 cases, palate and lower buccal sulcus 4 cases each, upper sulcus and lower lip 3 cases each. Furthermore, we observed that usage of tobacco products for greater than 5 years duration caused increased in no. of cases in all three groups of OSCC.

Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics
Full size table
Table 2 Clinicopathological data of OSCC patients and Healthy controls
Full size table

The median (IQR) of salivary protein levels observed in three study groups of OSCC and in control group were as follows: well differentiated OSCC 15.11 (13.88), moderately differentiated OSCC 26.5 (29.16), poorly differentiated OSCC 11.38 (9.81) mg/ml and in control group 3.2 (3.03) as shown in Table 3. Statistically significant difference with p value (< 0.001) was observed in salivary protein levels between OSCC and control group. Highest protein levels were observed in moderately differentiated OSCC followed by well differentiated OSCC and poorly differentiated OSCC. Lowest salivary protein levels were observed in control group. In pairwise comparison between three groups of OSCC with control group, significance was observed in salivary total protein levels between well differentiated and control group, moderately differentiated and control group and poorly differentiated and control group.

Table 3 Salivary total protein levels in OSCC and control groups
Full size table

Among total 60 OSCC patients, Cathepsin B in saliva was detected in 45 (70%) cases where as in the control group salivary Cathepsin B was detected in only 3 (15%) cases. The median (IQR) of salivary Cathepsin B levels observed in three groups of OSCC were as follows: well differentiated OSCC 3.57 (2.85) ng/ml, moderately differentiated OSCC 0.7 (1.54) ng/ml and poorly differentiated OSCC patients 1.76 (6.6) ng/ml. Statistically significant difference with p value (< 0.001) was observed in salivary Cathepsin B levels between OSCC and control group. Highest salivary Cathepsin B levels were observed in well differentiated OSCC followed by poorly differentiated OSCC and moderately differentiated OSCC as shown in Table 4. In pairwise comparison between three groups of OSCC with control group, highly significant p value was observed in salivary Cathepsin B levels between well differentiated and control group and poorly differentiated and control group.

Table 4 Salivary cathepsin B levels in OSCC and control group
Full size table

Among the 60 patients of OSCC according to tumor size, T1 comprised 5 (6.3%), T2 comprised 9 (11.3%), T3 comprised 17 (21.3%) and T4 comprised 29 (36.3%) OSCC cases respectively. Cathepsin B levels were also significantly increased with p value (< 0.001) according to tumor size as compared to healthy controls as shown in Table 4.

No significant association of salivary Cathepsin B levels with age, gender, site, frequency and duration of tobacco intake were observed as shown in Table 5.

Table 5 Association of Cathepsin B with patient related factors
Full size table

Univariate and multivariate analyses was performed to observe association of salivary Cathepsin B levels with clinicopathological characteristics and study groups. The only variable which observed significant association with Cathepsin B levels was the OSCC/non-OSCC group. Therefore, execution of multivariate analysis was not possible. Interpretations of regression (B) coefficient showed estimated increase in salivary Cathepsin B levels for well differentiated OSCC patients 3.37 ng/ml, for moderately differentiated OSCC patients 0.63 ng/ml and for poorly differentiated OSCC patients 2.99 ng/ml were observed respectively as shown in Table 6.

Table 6 Analysis of the association of estimated mean Cathepsin B levels with independent variables by linear regression
Full size table

By using Receiving Operative Curve (ROC), sensitivity 85% and specificity 80% with highly significant p value < 0.001 for Cathepsin B was observed as shown in Table 7 and Fig. 1.

Table 7 Cathepsin B cut-off for OSCC using receiving operative curve (ROC)
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis of the predictive value of Cathepsin B for OSCC

Full size image

Discussion

Oral squamous cell carcinoma worldwide is one of the most common malignant tumor, which has high rates of morbidity and mortality [27]. The main reason is that most OSCC cases when diagnosed are in advanced stages [28]. The diagnosis and monitoring of OSCC by using salivary biomarkers is considered a promising approach for lowering oral cancer burden and increase the overall survival rate [29]. This is the first study in which we have analyzed salivary levels of Cathepsin B in different histological grades of OSCC.

Cathepsin B role in cancer is attributed to extracellular matrix degradation resulting in tumor invasion and metastasis [23]. It is considered a promising biomarker as increased expression of Cathepsin B was reported in various types of metastasis and invasive cancers such as lung, breast, ovary, colon, gastric, nasopharyngeal and oral cancer [23]. Xu et al. in his research has reported increased expression of Cathepsin B in gastric carcinoma as compared to normal tissue which is found to be significantly associated with tumor size (p < 0.001), Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stage (p < 0.001) and decreased overall survival (p < 0.001) [30]. In malignant ovarian cancers, Cathepsin B levels were significantly elevated in cystic fluid as reported by Kolwijck et al. [31]. Chan et al. in his research analyzed Cathepsin B in 588 colon cancer patients and found that 82% patients were positive for Cathepsin B, which was further confirmed by Cavallo-Medved et al. and he concluded that elevated levels of Cathepsin B were associated with poor prognosis [32]. In nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Cathepsin B levels were significantly elevated in serum as compared to healthy controls which was significantly associated with TNM (p = 0.001) as observed by Tan et al. [24]. In breast cancer patients, Schraufstatter et al. observed increased Cathepsin B in serum with p value (0.015) as compared to normal control [31].

In our study, we observed prevalence of OSCC is higher in males as compared to females. Buccal mucosa as the most common site of OSCC occurrence was observed in our study. Tobacco consumption of both forms smoking and smokeless tobacco for greater than 5 years duration caused increase in no. of OSCC cases.

In our study, salivary total protein levels were increased significantly with p value (< 0.001) in patients of OSCC as compared to control group. Shivashankara along with Kavya Prabhu and Mussavira et al. has also reported in their studies that salivary protein levels were increased significantly in OSCC patients in comparison to control group [33, 34]. Proteins are accountable for most functions of saliva such as physical protection, lubrication, buffering, tooth integrity and antibacterial activity [35]. Total salivary proteins were increased in patients of OSCC probably due to the ongoing inflammatory response. It triggers the sympathetic activity which increases the synthesis and production of some proteins to increase the shielding effect of saliva and provide protective function to combat against OSCC [35]. Furthermore, increase in salivary total proteins occurs to combat the violation and aberration in capillaries and mucosal lining as a result of inflammation in OSCC [36]. In our study, we observed highest levels of total salivary protein in moderately differentiated followed by well differentiated and poorly differentiated OSCC. This could be due to the fact that total salivary protein levels in patients of OSCC is dependent on several factors relatable to patients such as (diet, gender and age) and factors related to disease such as (infection, metastasis and lymph node invasion) [37].

In our study, the levels of salivary Cathepsin B were determined in OSCC patients in different histological grades and according to tumor size. Cathepsin B was observed in 45 (70%) patients out of total 60 OSCC patients and in control group Cathepsin B was detected in only 3 (15%) of healthy controls. It was observed that salivary levels of Cathepsin B were increased significantly with p value (< 0.001) in patients of OSCC according to both histological grades and tumor size as compared to control group. Increased expression of Cathepsin B in tissues, serum and cell line were reported by several researches. Yang et al. in his research has observed increased CTSB expression in patients of OSCC, which was associated with higher tumor grade (p = 0.008) and lymph node metastasis (p = 0.007) [25]. Yang et al. has reported increased CTSB protein and mRNA levels in cell lines and tissues of OSCC patients as compared to adjacent non-malignant tissues by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), western blotting and immunohistochemistry analysis [38]. Saleh et al. in tongue cancer patients has observed elevated Cathepsin B in serum and tumor tissues associated with high tumor grade [39].

The highest salivary Cathepsin B levels in well differentiated group followed by poorly differentiated group, moderately differentiated OSCC group and controls were observed in our study. The variable results observed in our study, could be due to the fact that Broder’s histopathological grading of OSCC provides us information only about degree of differentiation of cell which is only one parameter [40]. However, prognosis of OSCC apart from histological grading also depends on other factors such as tumor size, lymph node invasion and metastasis [41]. Furthermore, as Cathepsin B is an inflammatory marker and more inflammatory cells are present in initial grades of OSCC that’s why this may be the plausible reason we observed increased Cathepsin B salivary levels in well differentiated OSCC [42]. Kullage et al. in his research had also reported high inflammatory cell count in patients of well differentiated OSCC in correspondence to moderate and poorly differentiated OSCC [43]. Cathepsin B role in cancer is related to basement membrane and extracellular matrix protein degradation, a mechanism which is responsible for metastasis and tumor invasion of cancer cells. It activates and initiates a proteolytic cascade in which urokinase plasminogen activator, matrix metalloproteinase and plasminogen all together causes degradation of extracellular matrix components. Cathepsin B also causes degradation of cell adhesion protein E cadherin at adhering junctions which causes detachment of cells. This altogether results in cell invasion, progression of tumor and metastases [44, 45]. That might be the plausible reason, we observed increased salivary Cathepsin B levels in poorly differentiated OSCC.

Conclusion

In our study, salivary Cathepsin B levels were significantly increased in patients of OSCC as compared to healthy controls. Thus, it can be considered a helpful and beneficial salivary biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of OSCC in different histological grades. Timely detection and treatment will increase the survival rate of OSCC and further reduce the mortality and morbidity rate. The results of the present study made the way for future studies on Cathepsin B as a non-invasive tool salivary biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of OSCC.

Limitations of the study

There are some limitations, which are present in our study. The sample size is small and this study contains research participants only from one tertiary care hospital of Karachi. We have only analyzed cathepsin B levels in patients of OSCC, patients with benign lesions and/or other chronic inflammatory oral diseases were not included in our study. Furthermore, we have analyzed OSCC samples only on the basis of histopathological grading and tumor size. Information about node status, distant metastasis, tumor staging and cancer specific survival was not recorded in our study. Further, research validation with large sample size and multicenter study, which represent the entire population of Pakistan with considerations of all parameters of OSCC, should be conducted in future.

Availability of data and materials

The raw data is a property of Dow University of Health Sciences. The data set used and analyzed during the current study are available from corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

OSCC:

Oral squamous cell carcinoma

CTSB:

Cathepsin B

ELISA:

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

TNM:

Tumor node metastasis

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristics

References

  1. Chaves FN, Bezerra TMM, Moraes DC, dos Santos Costa SF, Silva PGB, Alves APNN, et al. Loss of heterozygosity and immunoexpression of PTEN in oral epithelial dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma. Exp Mol Pathol. 2020;112: 104341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sahu S, Routray S. Assessing the analytical efficacy of TEX in diagnosing oral cancer using a systematic review approach. J Oral Pathol Med. 2021;50(2):123–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan Z, Dreger S, Shah SMH, Pohlabeln H, Khan S, Ullah Z, et al. Oral cancer via the bargain bin: the risk of oral cancer associated with a smokeless tobacco product (Naswar). PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7): e0180445.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaba FI, Sheth CC, Veses V. Salivary biomarkers and their efficacies as diagnostic tools for oral squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2021;50(3):299–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Principe S, Zapater-Latorre E, Arribas L, Garcia-Miragall E, Bagan J. Salivary IL-8 as a putative predictive biomarker of radiotherapy response in head and neck cancer patients. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;1–12.

  6. Pérot P, Falguieres M, Arowas L, Laude H, Foy J-P, Goudot P, et al. Investigation of viral etiology in potentially malignant disorders and oral squamous cell carcinomas in non-smoking, non-drinking patients. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(4): e0232138.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pałasz P, Adamski Ł, Górska-Chrząstek M, Starzyńska A, Studniarek M. Contemporary diagnostic imaging of oral squamous cell carcinoma—a review of literature. Pol J Radiol. 2017;82:193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen Q, Shao Z, Liu K, Zhou X, Wang L, Jiang E, et al. Salivary Porphyromonas gingivalis predicts outcome in oral squamous cell carcinomas: a cohort study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dikova V, Jantus-Lewintre E, Bagan J. Potential non-invasive biomarkers for early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Med. 2021;10(8):1658.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. de Barros-Silva PG, Fontes-Borges MM, Costa-Dias C, Mota-Lemos JV, do Perpétuo Socorro-Saldanha-Cunha M, Fernandes-Souza E, et al. Clinical-pathological and sociodemographic factors associated with the distant metastasis and overall survival of oral cavity and oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020;25(3): e375.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bjerkli I-H, Jetlund O, Karevold G, Karlsdóttir Á, Jaatun E, Uhlin-Hansen L, et al. Characteristics and prognosis of primary treatment-naive oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma in Norway, a descriptive retrospective study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(1): e0227738.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cristaldi M, Mauceri R, Di Fede O, Giuliana G, Campisi G, Panzarella V. Salivary biomarkers for oral squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis and follow-up: current status and perspectives. Front physiol. 2019;10:1476.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cui Y, Kim H-S, Cho ES, Han D, Park JA, Park JY, et al. Longitudinal detection of somatic mutations in saliva and plasma for the surveillance of oral squamous cell carcinomas. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(9): e0256979.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakamichi E, Sakakura H, Mii S, Yamamoto N, Hibi H, Asai M, et al. Detection of serum/salivary exosomal Alix in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Dis. 2021;27(3):439–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu D, Xin Z, Guo S, Li S, Cheng J, Jiang H. Blood and salivary micrornas for diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;79(5):1082.e1-1082.e13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Naz S, Salah K, Khurshid A, Hashmi AA, Faridi N. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-comparative evaluation of pathological parameters in young and old patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(9):4061–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Al Rawi N, Almabrok N, Kou RA, Mkadmi S, Rizvi Z, Hamdoon Z. The role of differentially expressed salivary microRNA in oral squamous cell carcinoma. A systematic review. Arch Oral Biol. 2021;125: 105108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Diesch T, Filippi C, Fritschi N, Filippi A, Ritz N. Cytokines in saliva as biomarkers of oral and systemic oncological or infectious diseases: a systematic review. Cytokine. 2021;143: 155506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chiamulera MMA, Zancan CB, Remor AP, Cordeiro MF, Gleber-Netto FO, Baptistella AR. Salivary cytokines as biomarkers of oral cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaur J, Jacobs R, Huang Y, Salvo N, Politis C. Salivary biomarkers for oral cancer and pre-cancer screening: a review. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(2):633–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmed MAA, Mohammed-Salih HS, Yassir YA, Al-Judy HJ. Time-related salivary cathepsin B levels and periodontal status in different orthodontic force magnitudes. J Baghdad Coll Dent. 2015;27(2):115–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kos J, Mitrović A, Mirković BJ. The current stage of cathepsin B inhibitors as potential anticancer agents. Future Med Chem. 2014;6(11):1355–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gondi CS, Rao JS. Cathepsin B as a cancer target. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2013;17(3):281–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tan G, Liu Q, Tang X, Kang T, Li Y, Lu J, et al. Diagnostic values of serum cathepsin B and D in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang W-E, Ho C-C, Yang S-F, Lin S-H, Yeh K-T, Lin C-W, et al. Cathepsin B expression and the correlation with clinical aspects of oral squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3): e0152165.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1–2):248–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ankita K, Shwetha V, Vanitha S, Sujatha SR, Nagaraju R, Pavan KT. Assessment of salivary endothelin-1 in patients with leukoplakia, submucous fibrosis, oral cancer and healthy individuals—a comparative study. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;120(4):326–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Smriti K, Ray M, Chatterjee T, Shenoy R-P, Gadicherla S, Pentapati K-C, et al. Salivary MMP-9 as a biomarker for the diagnosis of oral potentially malignant disorders and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020;21(1):233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. He L, Ping F, Fan Z, Zhang C, Deng M, Cheng B, et al. Salivary exosomal miR-24-3p serves as a potential detective biomarker for oral squamous cell carcinoma screening. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;121: 109553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu L, Peng S, Zhang N, Liu R, Huang Q, Li X, et al. Expression status of cathepsin B may as a prognostic marker for human gastric carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2016;9(7):6988–98.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ruan H, Hao S, Young P, Zhang H. Targeting cathepsin B for cancer therapies. Horiz Cancer Res. 2015;56:23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen S, Dong H, Yang S, Guo H. Cathepsins in digestive cancers. Oncotarget. 2017;8(25):41690.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Mussavira S, Kumar HH, Bindhu O. Evaluation of sialic acid, uric acid, total protein and amylase activity in biofluids of OSCC patients. Res J Life Sci. 2020;6:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shivashankara A, Kavya Prabhu M. Salivary total protein, sialic acid, lipid peroxidation and glutathione in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Biomed Res. 2011;22(3):355–9.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kumar JS, Gayathri R, Priya VV. Evaluation of salivary total proteins, albumin, globulin, and albumin/globulin ratio among healthy individuals and patients with chronic gingivitis. Drug Invent Today. 2018;10(6):925–8.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hasan HR, Abdelwahb NN. Evaluation of protein level’s changes in saliva and sera of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Baghdad Sci J. 2014;11(2):447–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Al-Muhtaseb SI. Serum and saliva protein levels in females with breast cancer. Oncol Lett. 2014;8(6):2752–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang X, Wei K-J, Zhang L, Pan H-Y, Li J, Zhong L-P, et al. Increased expression of Cathepsin B in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac. 2010;39(2):174–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Saleh Y, Wnukiewicz J, Trziszka T, Siewinski M, Ziolkowski P, Kopec W. Cathepsin B and cysteine protease inhibitors in human tongue cancer: Correlation with tumor staging and in vitro inhibition of cathepsin B by chicken cystatin. J Cancer Mol. 2006;2:67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Akhter M, Hossain S, Rahman QB, Molla MR. A study on histological grading of oral squamous cell carcinoma and its co-relationship with regional metastasis. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2011;15(2):168.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jayade BV, Bhat K, Patil B, Nayak R, Sant A. Histological significance of p53 gene expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;8(3):205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fonović M, Turk B. Cysteine cathepsins and extracellular matrix degradation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1840(8):2560–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kullage S, Jose M, Shanbhag VKL, Abdulla R. Qualitative analysis of connective tissue stroma in different grades of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a histochemical study. Indian J Dent Res. 2017;28(4):355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lampe C, Gondi C. Cathepsin B inhibitors for targeted cancer therapy. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2014;6(10):417–21.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Turk V, Stoka V, Vasiljeva O, Renko M, Sun T, Turk B, et al. Cysteine cathepsins: from structure, function and regulation to new frontiers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1824(1):68–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful and like to thank to all the research participants for their cooperation and giving precious time and consent for participating in our study.

Funding

Self-funded research, no funding for the current study was received by any organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oral Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan

    Alveena Shabbir

  2. Department of Dow College of Biotechnology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan

    Humera Waheed

  3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan

    Shaheen Ahmed

  4. Department of NILGID, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan

    Sabhita Shabir Shaikh

  5. Department of School of Public Health, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan

    Waqas Ahmed Farooqui

Authors
  1. Alveena Shabbir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Humera Waheed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shaheen Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sabhita Shabir Shaikh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Waqas Ahmed Farooqui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AS: contributed in conceptualizing the overall study, data collection, sample processing and drafting of manuscript. HW: Co-supervised the study and contributed in conceptualizing the overall study, sample processing, drafting and editing of manuscript. SA: Supervised the study and contributed in conceptualizing the overall study, data collection and drafting and editing of the main manuscript. SS: contributed and helped in assessments of patients of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. WA: contributed in analyzing the results of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Humera Waheed or Shaheen Ahmed.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study is completed after approval from Institutional Review Board of Dow University of Health Sciences IRB Number: IRB-1223/DUHS/Approval/2019/34. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent in written from all the research participants was obtained according to Helsinki's declaration.

Consent for publication

The current study does not contain any images or videos related to any research participant. The consent for publication is obtained from all research participants included in the current study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shabbir, A., Waheed, H., Ahmed, S. et al. Association of salivary Cathepsin B in different histological grades among patients presenting with oral squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Oral Health 22, 63 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02052-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02052-1

Keywords

  • Oral squamous cell carcinoma
  • Saliva
  • ELISA
  • Cathepsin B
  • Biomarker
  • Histological grades

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us