Study design
An analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted with 12-year-old students enrolled in public and private schools in the city of Shenzhen, China. Data collection was performed from 11/23/2020 to 11/27/2020. Ethics approval was obtained from Medical Ethics Committee of Longhua People’s Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University (Approval No. KY20201104).
Survey sampling
Two-stage probabilistic cluster sampling was performed to select participants who were representative of the Longhua district of Shenzhen population. In the first stage, the number of private and public schools was selected. In the second stage, schools were randomly selected with probability proportional to size (PPS). The number of students included in the study was representative and proportional to the number of Shenzhen Hukou and non-Shenzhen Hukou students in the population of each district.
A letter of invitation and informed consent form were sent to the guardian of potential participants firstly, emphasizing that the participation was voluntary. Participants and their statutory guardians were required to sign informed consent forms. Adolescents with serious physical or psychological illness or disadvantages, who were unable or unwilling to complete the examination and questionnaire, were excluded. Ultimately, a random sample of students completed the survey; this number was greater than the expected participants calculated by the formula:
$$N = deff{*}\left( {\frac{{{\text{Z}}_{\alpha /2} }}{{\updelta }}} \right)^{2} \pi \left( {1 - \pi } \right)$$
in which the allowable error δ = 0.05 and α = 0.05 was adopted. π adopted the prevalence of gingival bleeding in people at aged 12 years from the Fourth National Oral Health Survey in China p = 58.4% [17]. A design effect of 2 was considered to correct for the sampling method, resulting in a sample of 747 adolescents. Then, 20% was added to compensate for expected missing data. The final sample was 934 adolescents. According to the class sampling survey of 100 students, a total of 10 schools needed to be selected.
Quality control
Quality control was conducted as following: three licensed dentists, who had worked for more than 2 years and cooperated with three recorders, were trained by a standard examiner (the fourth examiner) before beginning this survey. The Cohen’s Kappa statistic was used to assess the inter-examiner variability of dental caries in adolescents and the final Kappa scores obtained on inter- or intra-examiner variability were ≥ 0.75. Furthermore, the inter-examiner variability in three regions during the survey were ≥ 0.75 as well.
Questionnaire
The questionnaire was distributed to 1000 participants in 12 years old in Shenzhen.
All participants were asked to fill out the self-reported questionnaire, including demographic variables, socioeconomic status, dietary habit, oral health behavior, oral health-related knowledge, oral health-related attitude and the impact on oral health-related quality of life. The annual household income was not investigated because students may not be certain about it, and it was a sensitive issue. Therefore, the socioeconomic status here was tested by the economic situation of the street where the school is located and the parental educational level [18]. Parental educational level was classified into two levels: ≤ 8 years and > 8 years. Sugar intake level involved the consumption of desserts and candies, carbonated beverage (e.g., cola) and sugary drinks (e.g., sugary tea), which were clarified by five levels: Never, 1–3/month, 1/week, 2–6/week, 1/day, more than 2/day. These five levels were assigned with “Never” = 1, “1–3/month” = 2, “1/week” = 3, “2–6/week” = 4, “1/day” = 5, “More than 2/day” = 6 points, and then added the scores of 3 items, with the total score ranging from 3 to 18 points. The higher the total score, the more the sugar intake. The total score is divided into three grades according to the tri-sectional quantiles of accuracy. Oral health behavior included the frequency of tooth brushing, the frequency of dental flossing and the dental visit experience. The frequency of tooth brushing may choose more than once a day, once a day, less than once a day and never, then divided the participants into sometimes or never/daily. The frequency of dental flossing may choose daily, weekly, occasionally and never, then divided the participants into dental flossing usage /not. The dental visit experience was determined from the question ‘Did you ever go to the dentist?’ and clarified as yes and no. Oral health-related knowledge and attitude were evaluated by twelve questions about the understanding of the cause and prevention of oral diseases, the importance of oral health and the way to promote oral health. We rated each question with a score of 1 for correct answers, a score of 0 for wrong answers or unknown. We calculated the rate of correct answers and divided the participants into low, intermediate and high levels of knowledge and awareness according to the tri-sectional quantiles of accuracy [19]. The modified oral impact on daily performance (OIDP) scale was used to measure oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), which was widely used in the Fourth National Oral Health Survey in China. The scale included nine aspects: eating, pronunciation, brushing teeth or gargling, doing housework, going to school, sleeping, grinning, easy to worry and interpersonal communication. The items were simple and easy to understand, which was convenient for teenagers to make clear answers according to their own actual situation. As for the total score of 9 items in the OIDP scale, this study first assigned the options with “serious impact” = 1, “general impact” = 2, “slight impact” = 3, “no impact” = 4 points, and then added the scores of 9 items, with the total score ranging from 9 to 36 points. The lower the total score, the worse the oral health-related quality of life. The total score is divided into two grades. Set the total score > 27 as having no influence on oral health-related quality of life, and the total score ≤ 27 as having influence.
Clinical assessment
All clinical procedures were conducted in the adolescents’ school in the following sequence. Each participant in the selected regions received an oral health examination by a trained licensed dentist according to the criteria issued by the WHO [20]. The portable equipment used consisted of a dental chair, external light source, flat dental mirror and the community periodontal index probe (WHO/CPI probe) in conjunction with WHO clinical criteria and visual examinations [20]. Dental caries status was assessed based on the methods and criteria recommended by the WHO [20]. The DMFT index was used to record the caries experience of permanent dentition [20]. Caries were detected mainly visually and recorded if a lesion had an unmistakable cavity, a shadow of discolored dentine visible through intact enamel, or a detectable softened floor or wall [20]. Signs of early caries, such as white or brown spot lesions and rough surfaces or fissures that were sticky to probing but without a detectable softened floor or wall, were not diagnosed as dental caries. Gingival bleeding was defined as the presence of gingival bleeding upon gentle probing (BOP) in at least one site [20]. The gingival calculus was explored by using CPI probe. The probe started just distal to the midpoint of the buccal surface and then gently moved into the mesial interproximal area. The same procedure was completed on the palatal surface. Bleeding sites were scored after the sites of a single quadrant were probed. Each site was scored as no bleeding = 0 and bleeding = 1. A gentle tactile exam was used to locate calculus deposits. Each site was scored as followings: no calculus = 0; calculus = 1. Probing depth, and clinical attachment level were not assessed. No radiographic examination was performed.
After completing the oral examination, all adolescents received an oral evaluation form to take home. This form classified the child’s oral health status according to the severity of the oral findings and recommended the timing of their next dental visit [20, 21].
Statistical analysis
The data were independently extracted for the statistical analyses by two of the authors (H. C. and R. Z.). The whole information was extracted from the questionnaires and the oral health assessment form. EpiData Version 3.1 (EpiData Association, http://www.epidata.dk, Epidata Association, Odense, Den- mark) was used for data capture. In order to ensure the consistency and the accuracy of the data, the items were assessed more than 3 times during the input process. Any disagreements or mistakes were assessed further and dealt by the original data in questionnaires.
Descriptive analysis was performed, followed by bivariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression analysis for complex samples. The dependent variable was dichotomized (yes/no) based on the adolescents’ reports of having dental visit experience. 10 Variables with a P value < 0.05 in the univariate bivariate analysis were incorporated into the multivariate analysis. Variables with a P value < 0.05 were maintained in the final model. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented in both the bivariate and multivariate analysis. No multicollinearity problems were found among the variables in this study. The statistical procedures were performed in SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).