Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between migration and oral health-related quality of life: results from a nationally representative online survey

BMC Oral Health volume 22, Article number: 309 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the link between individuals with and without migration background and oral health-related quality of life (also stratified by sex).

Methods

Data in this cross-sectional study were taken from a nationally representative survey (n = 3075, August/September 2021). The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G5) was used to measure oral health-related quality of life. Two-part models were calculated, adjusting for various covariates.

Results

Individuals with migration background had lower oral health-related quality of life (total sample, Cohen’s d = − 0.30; in men, d =− 0.44; in women, d =− 0.22). Two-part models also revealed that the migration background was associated with a higher likelihood of OHIP-G5 scores of one or higher (total sample and in both sexes). Moreover, migration background was positively associated with the extent of oral health-related quality of life (conditional on OHIP-G5 scores of one or higher; total sample and in men). Furthermore, regressions showed that migration background was associated with lower oral health-related quality of life (total sample and in both sexes).

Conclusions

Our study emphasized the link between having a migration background and lower oral health-related quality of life among both women and men. Maintaining oral health among individuals with a migration background is a key challenge. Culturally and socially sensitive actions should provide easy accessible oral health information and preventive measures in order to lower access barriers in dental care for individuals with migration background.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Inequalities in oral diseases can be seen in marginalized and poor groups of society [1]. Non-white race and ethnicity, low levels of education, low family income are risk factors for suffering from oral diseases (caries, tooth loss, periodontitis, need for dental prosthesis) [2]. A migration background does not per se cause disease initiation/development, but the accumulation of risk factors are especially seen in migrant groups that are often socioeconomically disadvantaged [3]. They experience a lot of different barriers to health services [4]. The healthcare system in general, but also the prevention programs and treatment costs (out-of-pockets payments) can differ fundamentally to their country of birth and people with migration background often present a lower utilization of health care services [5].

In 2010, the age-standardized prevalence of untreated caries lesion in permanent teeth was > 51% in Germany [6], the prevalence of tooth loss (having less than 9 remaining teeth) was 2.5% [7] and the prevalence for severe periodontitis in western Europe was 9.4% [8]. The consequences of chronic oral diseases are considerable: the chewing of food, and thus the first step of digestion, is impaired. Pronunciation may change, and of course such people often suffer from the aesthetic impairments. This is often accompanied by poor self-esteem, social isolation, and even feelings of loneliness [9]. Furthermore, chronic oral inflammation can either directly affect the general health via bacteria translocation or indirectly via immunometabolic alterations and alterations in the bone marrow [10]. Literature is reporting an association between periodontitis and atherosclerosis, hypertension, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, metabolic syndrome, diabetes and many more (reviewed in [11]).

The oral health-related quality of life index evaluates the oral health, the psychological well-being and utilization patterns for healthcare in individuals. Literature is reporting a different risk for oral health-related quality of life in men and women [12], and this gender differences can partly be explained by different accumulation of dental diseases (e.g. periodontitis, caries lesions and oral cancer) [13]. When compared to people with no migration background, people with migration background present significantly impaired oral health-related quality of life in Germany [14]. According to the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF), 26% of the German population has a migration background (almost one third migrated from EU countries and another third from other European countries). Consequently, those migrant groups are not marginal groups of society. They display a quarter of the German population, but still literature addressing this problematic trend is rare [15,16,17,18], especially for Germany [14].

Therefore, the aim of the current study is to evaluate the association between individuals with and without migration background and oral health-related quality of life in adults with migration background in Germany (also stratified by sex).

Material & methods

Sample

Data for our current cross-sectional study were taken from a nationally representative online survey (n = 3,075; 18–70 years; living in Germany). It is worth noting that the questionnaire was exclusively available in one language (Germany; please also see the limitations section). Data collection took place from August to September 2021. An established market research company recruited participants (based on an online sample). They were included in a way that our sample corresponds to the distribution of gender, age as well as the federal state in the German adult population.

Outcome: oral health-related quality of life

To measure oral health-related quality of life, we used the well-known Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G5 [19]) which encompasses four factors [1] oral function, [2] orofacial pain, [3] appearance and [4] psychosocial impact. Favorable psychometric characteristics of the OHIP-G5 have been shown [19]. The items were as follows (in each case: 0-never, 1-hardly ever, 2-occasionally, 3-fairly often, and 4-very often): [1] Have you had difficulty chewing any foods because of problems with your teeth, mouth, dentures or jaw? [2] Have you felt that there has been less flavor in your food because of problems with your teeth, mouth, dentures or jaws? [3] Have you had painful aching in your mouth? [4] Have you felt uncomfortable about the appearance of your teeth, mouth dentures or jaws? [5] Have you had difficulty doing your usual jobs because of problems with your teeth, mouth, dentures or jaws? A sum score was computed. Thus, the OHIP-G5 ranges from 0 to 20 (higher scores reflect lower oral health-related quality of life). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.85 in our current study.

Independent variables

The key independent variable was self-rated migration background (no; yes). It was explained as follows in the questionnaire: “A person has a migration background if he or she or at least one parent was not born with German citizenship”. This is a common way to quantify the migration background [20].

Based on prior research (e.g., [21,22,23,24] and also based on theoretical considerations, covariates were selected. More precisely, an association between various sociodemographic factors and oral health-related quality has been shown. For example, an association between age as well as education and oral health-related quality of life has been shown by Rebelo et al. [23]. Another study demonstrated an association between sex and oral health-related quality of life [25]. Moreover, an association between family status [26], children [27] as well as employment status [28] and oral health-related quality of life has been shown [26]. Moreover, an association between lifestyle factors (e.g., smoking status [29], alcohol intake [29] and sports activities [30]) and oral health-related quality has been shown. Additionally, an association between self-rated health as well as chronic diseases and oral health-related quality of life has been documented [31, 32]. Furthermore, an association between several sociodemographic, lifestyle as well as health-related factors and migration has been identified (e.g., [33,34,35,36,37,38,39]).

As covariates, we included sociodemographic factors: sex (men; women), age in years, children in the same household (two answer categories: no; yes), family status (distinguishing between: married, living together with spouse; married, not living together with spouse; divorced; single; widowed), labor force participation (full-time employed; retired; other), and level of education (with the following options: without school-leaving qualification; currently in school training/education; lower secondary school; intermediate secondary school; polytechnic secondary school; qualification for applied upper secondary school; upper secondary school). Furthermore, we included lifestyle- and health-related covariates: sports activities (distinguishing between: regularly, more than 4 h a week; regularly, 2–4 h a week; regularly, 1–2 h a week; less than one hour a week; no sports activity), smoking status (with the categories: never smoker; no, not anymore; yes, sometimes; yes, daily), alcohol intake (never; less often than 1–3 times per month; 1–3 times per month; once a week; several times per week; daily), vaccination against Covid-19 (with two options: no; yes), self-rated health (single-item ranging from 1 = very bad to 5 = very good) and chronic diseases (two option: presence of at least one chronic disease; absence of chronic diseases).

Statistical analysis

Sample characteristics are displayed stratified by migration background. We also calculated the effect sizes (Cohen’s d). Thereafter, unadjusted and adjusted two-part models [40] were performed (first part: logit model; second part: generalized linear model with gamma distribution and log link function – considering the skewed distribution [41]) to analyze the link between migration background and oral health-related quality of life.

Two-part models are often used when there is a large proportion of values of zero (in our study: highest oral health-related quality of life). The “twopm” command was used in this study [40]. We also calculated average marginal effects (AME; due to reasons of interpretability of the results) reflecting the change in oral health-related quality of life associated with a one-unit change in the regressors.

The level of significance was determined at p < .05. In our study, we used Stata 16.1 (Stata Corp., College Station, Texas) for statistical analysis.

Results

Sample characteristics stratified by migration background

The average age was 45.5 years (SD:14.7 years) among individuals without a migration background and it was 37.0 years (SD:13.6 years) among individuals with a migration background. In sum, 49.6% were female among individuals without a migration background, whereas 62.4% were female among individuals with a migration background.

Bivariately, the migration status was associated with most of the other variables (except for children in the same household and sports activities). The average oral health-related quality of life was 2.1 (SD: 3.2) among individuals without a migration background, whereas it was 3.1 (SD: 4.1) among individuals with a migration background. According to Cohen’s d, individuals with migration background had lower oral health-related quality of life (total sample, d = − 0.30; in men, d=−0.44; in women, d=−0.22) (Table 1).

Table 1 Sample characteristics stratified by migration background (n = 3,075)
Full size table

A description of the OHIP-G5 items (also referring to the four dimensions) is displayed in Table 2.

Table 2 Description of the OHIP-G5 among the total sample
Full size table

Regression analysis

Findings of two-part models are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Determinants of oral health-related quality of life. Two-part models (unadjusted models; (1) Logit (2) GLM1)
Full size table

In unadjusted two-part models, the migration background was associated with a higher likelihood of OHIP-G5 scores of one or higher (first part: logit model) in the total sample (OR: 1.54, p < .001) and in both sexes (women, OR: 1.42, p < .05; men, OR: 1.70, p < .01). In addition, migration background was positively associated with the extent of oral health-related quality of life (conditional on OHIP-G5 scores of one or higher; second part) in the total sample (b = 0.19, p < .01) and in men (b = 0.29, p < .001). Furthermore, following the AME, migration background was associated with lower oral health-related quality of life in the total sample (AME: 0.88, p < .001) and in both sexes (women, AME: 0.64, p < .01; men, AME:1.28, p < .001) (Table 3).

Two-part models (adjusted models) also revealed that the migration background was associated with a higher probability of OHIP-G5 scores of one or higher (first part: logit model) in the total sample (OR: 1.60, p < .001) and in both sexes (women, OR :1.57, p < .01; men, OR: 1.69, p < .01). Moreover, migration background was positively associated with the extent of oral health-related quality of life (conditional on OHIP-G5 scores of one or higher; second part) in the total sample (b = 0.17, p < .01) and in men (b = 0.19, p < .05). Additionally, according to the AME, migration background was associated with lower oral health-related quality of life in the total sample (AME: 0.84, p < .001) and in both sexes (women, AME: 0.65, p < .01; men, AME: 0.98, p < .001) (Table 4). The interaction terms (migration x sex) did not achieve statistical significance in these models (interaction term; first part: OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.53 − 1.40, p = .56; second part, b = −0.14, 95% CI:− 0.37-0.09, p = .23).

Table 4 Determinants of oral health-related quality of life. Two-part models (adjusted models; (1) Logit (2) GLM1)
Full size table

Discussion

Main findings

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between migration background and oral health-related quality of life (also stratified by sex). Our study showed small (women) to medium (men) differences in oral health-related quality of life (in terms of effect size) between individuals with migration background and their counterparts. Two-part models revealed that the migration background was associated with a higher likelihood of OHIP-G5 scores of one or higher total sample and in both sexes. Moreover, migration background was positively associated with the extent of oral health-related quality of life (total sample and in men). Furthermore, migration background was associated with lower oral health-related quality of life (total sample and in both sexes).

Previous research and possible explanations

The Platform of Longitudinal Studies on Immigrant Families (PELFI) evaluated data, in a cross-sectional study design, from 401 adults aged over 18 years from Spain, Morocco, Colombia, and Ecuador [16]. The study population consisted of middle-aged adults (Males: 48.4% between 45 and 54 years; Females: 36.2% between 45 and 54 years), when compared to our data with a mean age of the study population of 37.0 years (SD 13.6). The authors applied the OHIP 14 instrument and revealed a statistically significant association between immigration and OHRQoL only for Moroccan women (OR:5.08; 95% CI:1.93–13.34). We could detect a significant association between migration background and lower oral health-related quality of life for men and women, which is in line with another U.S. American study. The authors included data from 733 subjects from the TEETH (“Trials to Enhance Elders’ Teeth and Oral Health”) study. The distribution of men and women was almost homogeneous (44.4% males) and the authors reported a significant association between ethnicity (foreign-born vs. North American) and number of years after immigrating to North America with oral health-related quality of life (assessed via the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI)) [15].

Unfortunately, a more detailed comparison of OHRQoL Indices in adult migrant populations in Germany is still difficult due to a lack of studies. We could only identify one German study assessing oral health-related quality of life. However, this study focused on children/adolescents and it is therefore difficult to compare with our study [14].

The lower OHRQoL in people with and without migration background can have several reasons: Migration background is strongly associated with adverse oral health outcomes including a higher prevalence of untreated caries, severe periodontitis, and a higher number of missing teeth, which are all related to low oral health-related quality of life. The poor oral health of people with migration background relates to a lower socio-economic status (SES) [42] [43], high intake of sugar-rich beverages (i.e. sweetened tea), low oral health literacy [44], low and more pain than prevention oriented utilization of dental care services, poor German language skills, and other lifestyle and cultural difference in comparison to the non-migrant population [45]. In addition, people with migration background often live in socially deprived areas with a low physician-population ratio [46, 47].

Strengths and limitations

One strength is the large sample which matches the distribution of sex, age group and federal state in the German adult population. Two-part models were used. It was adjusted for various covariates in regression analysis. The OHIP-G5 was used to quantify oral health-related quality of life. It is highly associated with longer versions (e.g., version with 49 items: r = .93) [48]. A limitation is that the questionnaire was only available in German language. Thus, individuals with a migration background and with insufficient German language skills may be excluded. We therefore assume that the actual differences in oral health-related quality of life between the two groups may be underestimated. Moreover, future research is required which distinguishes migration status in further detail (e.g., first-generation migrants and second-generation migrants). The current study has a cross-sectional design, with the acknowledged limitations.

Conclusions

Our study emphasized the association of having a migration background and lower oral health-related quality of life among both women and men. Maintaining oral health among individuals with a migration background is a key challenge. Culturally and socially sensitive actions should provide easy accessible oral health information and preventive measures in order to lower access barriers in dental care for individuals with migration background.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to legal restrictions, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Peres MA, Macpherson LMD, Weyant RJ, Daly B, Venturelli R, Mathur MR, et al. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. Lancet. 2019;394(10194):249–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de Lucena EHG, da Silva RO, Barbosa ML, de Araújo ECF, Pereira AC, Cavalcanti YW. Influence of socioeconomic status on oral disease burden: a population-based study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):608.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Majid Z, Welch C, Davies J, Jackson T. Global frailty: The role of ethnicity, migration and socioeconomic factors. Maturitas. 2020;139:33–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Filler T, Jameel B, Gagliardi AR. Barriers and facilitators of patient centered care for immigrant and refugee women: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Klein J, von dem Knesebeck O. Inequalities in health care utilization among migrants and non-migrants in Germany: a systematic review. Int J Equity Health. 2018;17(1):160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015;94(5):650–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. Global burden of severe tooth loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014;93(7 Suppl):20s-8s.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. Global burden of severe periodontitis in 1990–2010: a systematic review and meta-regression. J Dent Res. 2014;93(11):1045–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Furuta M, Yamashita Y. Oral health and swallowing problems. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2013;1(4):216–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hajishengallis G, Chavakis T. Local and systemic mechanisms linking periodontal disease and inflammatory comorbidities. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(7):426–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bui FQ, Almeida-da-Silva CLC, Huynh B, Trinh A, Liu J, Woodward J, et al. Association between periodontal pathogens and systemic disease. Biomed J. 2019;42(1):27–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. McGrath C, Bedi R. Population based norming of the UK oral health related quality of life measure (OHQoL-UK©). Br Dent J. 2002;193(9):521–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lipsky MS, Su S, Crespo CJ, Hung M. Men and oral health: a review of sex and gender differences. Am J Men’s Health. 2021;15(3):15579883211016361.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Aarabi G, Reissmann DR, Sagheri D, Neuschulz J, Heydecke G, Kofahl C, et al. Oral health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with and without migration background in Germany. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(10):2619–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Swoboda J, Kiyak HA, Persson RE, Persson GR, Yamaguchi DK, MacEntee MI, et al. Predictors of oral health quality of life in older adults. Spec Care Dentist. 2006;26(4):137–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Agudelo-Suárez AA, Vivares-Builes AM, Muñoz-Pino N, Martínez-Martínez JM, Reid A, Ronda-Pérez E. Oral health-related quality of life in native and immigrant populations in the PELFI study in Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(10):1796.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Astrøm AN, Ekback G, Ordell S, Unell L. Social inequality in oral health-related quality-of-life, OHRQoL, at early older age: evidence from a prospective cohort study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2011;69(6):334–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Silveira ML, Dye BA, Iafolla TJ, Adesanya MR, Boroumand S, Youngblood ME, et al. Cultural factors and oral health-related quality of life among dentate adults: Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos. Ethn Health. 2020;25(3):420–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. John MT, Miglioretti DL, LeResche L, Koepsell TD, Hujoel P, Micheelis W. German short forms of the oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006;34(4):277–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lam OL, McMillan AS, Li LS, McGrath C. Predictors of oral health-related quality of life in patients following stroke. Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2014; 46:520-526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lam OL, McMillan AS, Li LS, McGrath C. Predictors of oral health-related quality of life in patients following stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46:520–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pakpour AH, Lin CY, Kumar S, Fridlund B, Jansson H. Predictors of oral health-related quality of life in Iranian adolescents: a prospective study. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018;9(1):e12264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rebelo MAB, Cardoso EM, Robinson PG, Vettore MV. Demographics, social position, dental status and oral health-related quality of life in community-dwelling older adults. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(7):1735–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Swoboda J, Kiyak HA, Persson RE, Persson GR, Yamaguchi DK, MacEntee MI, et al. Predictors of oral health quality of life in older adults. Spec Care Dent. 2006;26(4):137–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lawrence HP, Thomson WM, Broadbent JM, Poulton R. Oral health-related quality of life in a birth cohort of 32‐year olds. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008;36(4):305–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Teixeira MFN, Martins AB, Celeste RK, Hugo FN, Hilgert JB. Association between resilience and quality of life related to oral health in the elderly. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiol. 2015;18:220–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Locker D. Disparities in oral health-related quality of life in a population of Canadian children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35(5):348–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Al-Sudani FY, Vehkalahti MM, Suominen AL. Association of current employment status with oral health‐related behaviors: findings from the Finnish health 2000 survey. Euro J Oral Sci. 2016;124(4):368–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Silva AE, Demarco FF, Feldens CA. Oral health–related quality of life and associated factors in Southern Brazilian elderly. Gerodontology. 2015;32(1):35–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Almoznino G, Aframian D, Sharav Y, Sheftel Y, Mirzabaev A, Zini A. Lifestyle and dental attendance as predictors of oral health-related quality of life. Oral Dis. 2015;21(5):659–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jensen PM, Saunders RL, Thierer T, Friedman B. Factors associated with oral health–related quality of life in community-dwelling elderly persons with disabilities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(4):711–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Baniasadi K, Armoon B, Higgs P, Bayat AH, Mohammadi Gharehghani MA, Hemmat M, et al. The association of oral health status and socio-economic determinants with oral health‐related quality of life among the elderly: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Dent Hyg. 2021;19(2):153–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Padovese V, Egidi AM, Melillo Fenech T, Podda Connor M, Didero D, Costanzo G, et al. Migration and determinants of health: clinical epidemiological characteristics of migrants in Malta (2010–11). J Public Health. 2014;36(3):368–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Paul S. Characteristics of migrants coming to Europe: a survey among asylum seekers and refugees in Germany about their journey. Migr Lett. 2020;17(6):825–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Reyneri E. Education and the occupational pathways of migrants in Italy. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2004;30(6):1145–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bongard S, Pogge SF, Arslaner H, Rohrmann S, Hodapp V. Acculturation and cardiovascular reactivity of second-generation Turkish migrants in Germany. J Psychosom Res. 2002;53(3):795–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Şen F. The historical situation of Turkish migrants in Germany. Immigr Minorities. 2003;22(2–3):208–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Razum O, Sahin-Hodoglugil NN, Polit K. Health, wealth or family ties? Why Turkish work migrants return from Germany. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2005;31(4):719–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Verwiebe R. Migration to Germany: Is a middle class emerging among intra-European migrants?. Migr Lett. 2008;5(1):1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Belotti F, Deb P, Manning WG, Norton EC. twopm: two-part models. Stata J. 2015;15(1):3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Moran JL, Solomon PJ, Peisach AR, Martin J. New models for old questions: generalized linear models for cost prediction. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13(3):381–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Williams DR, Mohammed SA, Leavell J, Collins C. Race, socioeconomic status, and health: complexities, ongoing challenges, and research opportunities. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1186:69–101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Bock JO, Matschinger H, Brenner H, Wild B, Haefeli WE, Quinzler R, et al. Inequalities in out-of-pocket payments for health care services among elderly Germans–results of a population-based cross-sectional study. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13:3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Batista MJ, Lawrence HP, Sousa MdLRd. Oral health literacy and oral health outcomes in an adult population in Brazil. BMC Public Health. 2017;18(1):60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Spinler K, Weil M-T, Valdez R, Walther C, Dingoyan D, Seedorf U, et al. Mundgesundheitskompetenz von Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund – Erste Auswertungen der MuMi-Studie. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. 2021;64(8):977–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Scholz S, Graf von der Schulenburg J-M, Greiner W. Regional differences of outpatient physician supply as a theoretical economic and empirical generalized linear model. Human Resour Health. 2015;13(1):85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Hussein M, Diez Roux AV, Field RI. Neighborhood socioeconomic status and primary health care: usual points of access and temporal trends in a major US Urban area. J Urban Health. 2016;93(6):1027–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. John M, Omara M, Su N, List T, Sekulic S, Häggman-Henrikson B, et al. Recommendations for use and scoring of oral health impact profile versions. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022;22(1):101619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ghazal Aarabi and Carolin Walther shared first authorship

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Periodontics, Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany

    Ghazal Aarabi & Carolin Walther

  2. Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Germany

    Benedikt Kretzler, Larissa Zwar, Hans-Helmut König & André Hajek

Authors
  1. Ghazal Aarabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carolin Walther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benedikt Kretzler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Larissa Zwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hans-Helmut König
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. André Hajek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CW: Substantial contributions to conception, design and interpretation of data, drafting the article and final approval of the version to be published. GA: Substantial contributions to conception, design and interpretation of data, drafting the article and final approval of the version to be published. BK: Substantial contributions to acquisition of data, revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published. LZ: Substantial contributions to acquisition of data, revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published. HHK: Substantial contributions to acquisition of data, revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published. AH: Substantial contributions to conception and design of, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article, final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghazal Aarabi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval for the study was provided by the Local Psychological Ethics Committee of the Center for Psychosocial Medicine of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (number: LPEK-0356). Our study is in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s).

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aarabi, G., Walther, C., Kretzler, B. et al. Association between migration and oral health-related quality of life: results from a nationally representative online survey. BMC Oral Health 22, 309 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02337-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02337-5

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us