Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effect of training based on health belief model and behavioral intention on improving dental and oral self-care behavior in 9–12-year-old Iranian female students

BMC Oral Health volume 22, Article number: 515 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Training dental and oral health behaviors by using appropriate training models and theories is an important issue in preventing dental and oral diseases. the present study aimed to investigate the effect of training based on the health belief model and behavioral intention on dental and oral health behaviors in female students aged 9–12 years old in the city of Rudsar, Guilan, Iran.

Methods

This research is an interventional study conducted on 84 female students aged 9–12 years old, who lived in the city of Rudsar (n = 42 in the control group and n = 42 in the interventional group) in 2019. The data collection tools included questions on demographic variables, structures of the health belief model (perceived sensitivity, perceived severity, perceived barriers and benefits, self-efficiency), behavioral intention, and performance. The questionnaire was completed before the intervention and 3 months after it by both groups. The intervention group received four 45-min sessions. The data were analyzed using SPSS 24, descriptive tests, independent sample t-test, pair sample t-test, and regression (P < 0.05).

Results

The mean age of the intervention and control groups was 10.88 ± 1.01 and 10.80 ± 1.01, respectively. The results showed that the average scores of all structures of the health belief model and behavioral intention in the intervention group significantly changed compared to the average scores obtained before the intervention (P < 0.05). Moreover, the average scores of perceived sensitivity (p < 0.009), perceived barriers (p < 0.007), self-efficiency (p < 0.001), and behavioral intention (p < 0.001) significantly changed after the intervention in both groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

According to the results, the health belief model and the behavioral intention were effective in improving dental and oral health so that they can be applied to improving people's dental and oral health. It can also be used as a model to design, implement, and monitor medical health programs.

Peer Review reports

Background

Oral hygiene is an essential part of a person's general health, quality of life, and general well-being [1]. Dental and oral diseases are one of the most common diseases in the world and have serious health and economic burden, and severely reduce the affected people's quality of life [2]. The Global Burden of Disease (2017) showed that 3.5 billion people worldwide suffered from oral diseases and untreated tooth decay was the most common non-communicable disease [3]. Today, the prevalence and distribution of dental and oral diseases are different around the world [4]. According to the dental and oral health data of the World Bank, the prevalence of tooth decay in different countries ranges between 49 to 83% [5]. 60 to 90% of school students and almost 100% of adults have tooth decay. 61% of 6–12 years old children have one decayed and one fallen tooth in European countries [6]. The prevalence of tooth decay in Iran is high [7]. About 50% of 12-year-old children have tooth decay. And the mean of decayed, missing, and fallen teeth turned out to be 1.2, 0.06, and 0.23, respectively in iran [8]. The mean (SD) value of total DMFT indexFootnote 1 was 7.33 ± 3.0 in people aged 15–40 yr old of Kurdistan, western Iran in 2015 [9].

Until 2020, the new goals of the World Health Organization have focused on the use of experiences, evaluation of goals, and the importance of dental and oral health as an integrated part of general health [10].

Oral diseases are a major global public health problem. However, dental services have not yet health with such problems. On the other hand, dental services are not available and affordable for many people living in middle and low-income areas, especially in rural areas [11]. The consequences of untreated chronic oral and dental diseases are severe for the person and can include unrelenting pain, sepsis, reduced quality of life, loss of school days, disruption of family life, and reduced work productivity. Describing the prevalence and consequences of oral diseases and their neglect in global health politics, the urgent need to address oral diseases among other non-communicable diseases, as a global health priority [2]. Several public health initiatives have been implemented to control and reduce dental decay in children. The initiatives include providing free fluoride toothpaste, preschool brushing, oral hygiene programs, increasing access to affordable dental care, and school-based fluoride varnish programs [12]. It is also one of the main programs of the WHO in the field of chronic disease prevention and health promotion[13]. In this regard, there is an increasing focus on training dental hygiene and promotion programs to effectively control the progression of dental caries [12]. Training and dental and oral health self-care behaviors (flossing and brushing) can be mentioned as factors affecting reduced tooth decay [14,15,16]. The training interventions are useful for dental and oral health and are considered the first step in prevention and health culture promotion [17]. The first step in designing a training program is selecting a training model because "theories" in health education describe relationships and lie in the basics, through which the consequences and results of interventions can be predicted, measuring the effectiveness of the intervention [18]. Studies have shown that self-efficacy, perceived barriers, perceived sensitivity, and perceived severity are the most predictive factors of dental and oral health behaviors [19, 20]. These factors are the structures of the health belief model (HBM) in training health. This model is used to investigate the reasons for rejecting health issues by people and explain the behaviors of people who think they never get sick [21]. In the present study, the structure of behavioral intention taken from the theory of rational action and the theory of planned behavior will be examined as a structure before the structure of behavior in HBM. The second structure of rational action theory and planned behavior theory is behavioral intention. This structure includes thinking to perform a behavior, which is the immediate determinant of a specific behavior. It seems that there is a high consistency between intention and behavior. Individuals' intentions change over time. Therefore, behavior intention should be assessed sometime after the intervention [22]. Finally, according to studies and the researcher's inference, and the above-mentioned explanations, it seems that the health belief model is deficient in this regard. Given that the above-mentioned advantages refer to the lack of a structure in the health belief model, which would help measure the effectiveness of interventions if added to the model, the researcher suggests adding such a structure to the model. According to the Iranian Ministry of Health, most Iranian students do not pay enough attention to their oral health; 76.9% of them have reported that they brush less than twice a day. The highest age at risk of developing oral diseases is in the age range of 12–14 years old. Oral health problems can be still observed in this target group. This age range is of great importance because children finish their studies in elementary school and move to the higher level. Therefore, in many countries, this is the last station to reach a reliable sample through the school system [23]. Many studies have indicated that beliefs and attitudes about dental and oral health affect oral health-related behaviors [24, 25]. Considering the increasing incidence and prevalence of tooth decay, and the importance of the mentioned issues, as well as the characteristics and effectiveness of interventions based on the health belief model in changing behavior, the importance of self-care in dental and oral diseases and the importance of behavioral intention, the present study aimed to determine the effect of training based on health belief model and behavioral intention on self-care behavior in Iranian female students aged 9–12 years old. It is hoped to achieve improvement in students’ dental and oral self-care behaviors using the health belief model and adding the structure of behavioral intention from the rational action model and theory of planned behavior.

Methods

The present study was a semi structured intervention conducted in 2019. The population consisted of students in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades in elementary schools in the city of Rudsar. The samples were selected from schools of Rudsar using the cluster sampling method. This method was considered to be suitable because there was no list of all observations in many areas, as well as due to heterogeneity and classification in observations, and creating the distribution of economic, social, gender, educational level, etc. To select a sample of 84 students, 2 elementary schools were randomly selected, and then 2 classes were randomly selected from each school.

In this study, G*POWER was used to determine the sample size, and it was calculated to be 42 people in each group, considering the 5% first type error level, test power of 80%, and effect size of 60%.

In this study was used block randomization Permuted In which the size of the blocks was randomly selected so that 8 and 10 blocks (6 blocks of 10 and one block of 8) using Random allocation software were used and in each block there was an equal number of each group in which by blinding method Provided to the researcher.

The two groups were homogenous in terms of demographic variables. The inclusion criteria in the first stage included students in 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades of elementary school, normal, aged 9–12 years, and willingness of students or their parents to participate in the study. The exclusion criteria were immigration, dropping out of school, and absence for more than one session. There were two groups in this study: a control group that received no intervention, and the intervention group that received the training program using the structures of the health belief model with the structure of behavioral intention. Figure 1 presents the study flow chart.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study

Full size image

Before the intervention, the participants and their parents were explained about the purpose of the study, and the informed written consent forms were obtained. In addition, the training program for the intervention group is based on a model-based training package (speech, question and answer, discussion group, watching videos, pictures, and PowerPoint files) in four 45-min sessions. The subjects learned about the dental self-care program and its effect on dental and oral disease prevention, the importance of participation in training sessions, and the importance of the regular dental visit.

In a session, a 12-year-old student, who had tooth decay and loss due to a lack of dental and oral self-care, was asked to talk about her problems. A dentist was also asked to visit the students. In the end, a pamphlet was provided to the samples of the intervention group, and a WhatsApp group was considered for communication. The intervention group received the training program for 4 sessions. Every session took 45 min, and two follow-up sessions (one month and two months after the intervention) were held. Three months after the intervention, the data were gathered using the same questionnaire. Finally, the data were analyzed and compared.

Data collection tools

The data collection tools in this study were a questionnaire, consisting of demographic characteristics, questions on perceived sensitivity, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and perceived self-efficiency, taken from the health belief model, and the structure of behavioral intention derived from the rational action model and theory of planned behavior. It also included questions on the scale of performance concerning dental and oral health. The questions were scored using a 5-point Likert scale. The questionnaire and face-to-face interviews with the subjects were used to collect data.

To design the questionnaire, the questionnaire on the effect of the health belief model on students' dental and oral health developed by Dr. Parisa Kasmaei [26] was used and the questionnaire developed by Dr. Amir Pakpour Hajibaba [27] was used to assess the structure of behavioral intention. The validity and reliability of both questionnaires were confirmed [26, 27].

The questionnaire is composed of 2 parts:

  1. a)

    demographic characteristics including birth rank, family size, parents' education, parent's occupation, and living place.

  2. b)

    the structure of the health belief model and the structure of behavioral intention derived from the rational action model.

    1. 1.

      The structure of perceived sensitivity included 3 items divided by a 5-point Likert scale. The lowest score had 0 points and the highest score had 5 points. The students' perceived sensitivity scores were scaled in three levels (low (1–5), medium (5–10), and high (10–15)).

    2. 2.

      The structure of perceived severity included 7 items divided by a 5-point Likert scale. Zero point was deducted from the lowest score and 5 points to the highest score. The scores were scaled in three levels (low (0–11), medium (11–23), and high (23–35)).

    3. 3.

      The structure of perceived benefits included 3 items divided by a 5-point Likert scale. The lowest score had 0 points and the highest score had 5 points. The scores were scaled in three levels (low (1–5), medium (5–10), and high (10–15)).

    4. 4.

      The structure of perceived barriers included 7 items divided by a 5-point Likert scale. The lowest score had zero points and the highest score had 5 points. The scores were scaled in three levels (low (0–11), medium (11–23), and high (23–35)).

    5. 5.

      The structure of self-efficiency included 5 items divided by a 5-point Likert scale. The lowest score had zero points and the highest score had 5 points. The scores of students' self-efficiency were scaled in three levels (low (0–8), medium (8–17), and high (17–25)).

    6. 6.

      The structure of behavioral intention included three items divided by a 5-scale. The lowest score had zero points and the highest score had 5 points. The scores were scaled in three levels (low (1–5), medium (5–10), and high (10–15)).

    7. 7.

      The questions on performance: two 7-part questions about brushing and Flossing times. The lowest score had zero points and the highest score had 7 points. The scores were scaled in three levels low (1–4), medium (4–9), and high (9–14)( Additional file 1: Appendix 1).

To analyze the data, a regression test was used to predict the variables. In this regard, the added structure of "behavioral intention" remained with the confirmation of the presence of the structure in the model. In general, the semi-structured study was performed when the results of the descriptive stage were determined.

In the second stage (semi-structured study), an independent sample t-test was used for double comparisons, and the repeated measure was used for repeated comparisons. The analyses were performed by SPSS.

Results

The mean age of the intervention and control groups was 10.88±1.01 and 10.80±1.01. In terms of demographic variables, the target group had the highest birth rank (2), family size (2), father's education (diploma), mother's education (high school), mother's occupation (housewife), father's occupation (worker), and living place (private). There was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in demographic variables. Therefore, the two groups were homogenous (Table 1).

Table 1 Homogeneity of demographic variables of the intervention and control groups (n = 84)
Full size table

The results of the regression analysis indicated that the score of the HBM model structures could significantly explain the variance of the behavioral intention structures. The amount of explanation of the dimensions of the HBM model structures for the behavioral intention structure was found to be 56.3%. Therefore, the level of explanatory power of the scale of the HBM model structures is at a strong level. Also, the results showed that the structures of the HBM model have a positive and significant effect on the structure of behavioral intention. Based on the standard regression coefficient, the structure of perceived sensitivity benefits had the greatest effect (β=.340) and the structure of behavior had the least effect (=.205β) on the structure of behavioral intention (Table 2).

Table 2 Regression model of the influence of HBM model structures on behavioral intention structure
Full size table

In the intervention group, the structures of the health belief model and behavioral intention showed significant differences from the results obtained before the intervention (3 months ago) while there was no significant difference in the control group. Also, there was found no significant difference between the two groups in the structures of the health belief model and behavioral intention before the intervention while, after the intervention, there was a significant difference between the two groups in the structures of perceived sensitivity, perceived barriers, self-efficiency, and behavioral intention (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of the structures of the health belief model and behavioral intention before and 3 months after the intervention in the two groups (n = 84)
Full size table

Table 4 shows the relationship between the demographic variables ad the structure of the health belief model and behavioral intention. There was a significant difference between the variables of birth rank, family size and Father's education with the structure of behavioral intention, and the variable of Father's education with the structures of perceived severity (Table 4).

Table 4 The relationship between demographic variables and the structure of the health belief model and behavioral intention
Full size table

Discussion

The present study aimed to improve dental and oral health behaviors in Iranian female students aged 9-12 years old by performing a training program based on the health belief model and behavioral intention. The comparison of mean scores of the health belief model structures before and after the intervention showed a significant difference between the mean scores of the intervention and control groups, which was in line with the results of Sanaeinasab et al., (2022) [28], Jeihooni et al., (2022) [29], Noori Sistani et al., (2022) [30]. An HBM-based training program can be more effective than the programs currently used for training optimal health behaviors in children. Such interventions along with other school programs for tooth decay prevention can be useful for primary school children [28]. Shaghaghian suggested interventional methods, especially training programs for children and parents [31]. In this study, a unique, Specific and academic training program based on a model-based training package (speech, question and answer, discussion group, watching videos, pictures, and PowerPoint files) was performed for the intervention group in four 45-minute sessions. The subjects learned about the dental self-care program and its effect on dental and oral disease prevention, the importance of participation in training sessions, and the importance of the regular dental visit , which has caused the impact of training on improving the structures of the health belief model.

The comparison of mean scores of behavioral intention before and after the intervention showed a significant difference between the two groups, which was in line with the results of Zareban et al., (2021) [32], Shitu et al., (2021) [10], and Karimi et al., (2020) [33]. In other words, the results of the present study indicated that training and encouraging individuals to dental and oral self-care affect their behavioral intention for dental and oral self-care. Considering that in the present study, based on the results of the regression analysis, the added behavioral intention to the health belief model was consistent with all constructs. It seems that in the current study, significant changes in other structures of the health belief model [Perceived sensitivity, Perceived intensity, Perceived benefits, Perceived barriers, self-efficacy] in the field of promoting oral and dental health behavior have led to a significant increase in behavioral intention.

A person's intention to perform a certain behavior is a reflection of the person's motivationIt is to perform a behavior, in other words, does a person show the necessary desire to perform a certain behavior or not? [34]. One of the limitations of the study is the measurement of oral and dental health behavior using the participants' answers to the behavior questions of the research questionnaire, which not using the experimental evidence of oral and dental health [such as dental plaque, the amount of decay or filling tooths of the participants before and after intervention]. The relationship between behavioral intention and behavior showed that people tend to be involved in behaviors they have intended to do; therefore, behavior is always the result of intention and associated with it [35]. In the other hand the behavior is controlled by behavioral intention and other possible factors might indirectly influence behavior through behavioral intention. behavioral intention is an individual’s intention to engage in certain behavior [36]. The behavioral intentions, the immediate precursors of behavior, are determined by attitude toward the behavior and used widely for the prediction and modification of human actions [37]. The structure of behavioral intention plays an important role in the formation of preventive behavior, and if the mentioned factor is subjected to appropriate training and intervention in educational interventions, a higher explanation of the intended behavior can be expected [34]. So Adding behavioral intention to the health belief model can be used to measure the impact of the educational intervention on the oral health behavior of the participants and can be considered as a criterion for their verification, and on the other hand, it can be a suitable step in the direction of adjusting the HBM model.

The results of present research show that, the values of perceived susceptibility and perceived severity (perceived threat) of experimental group has significant enhancement. Indicating the effectiveness of intervention in improving perceived susceptibility and perceived severity of the experimental group, The educational intervention for experimental group is performed in educational sessions by giving model-based training package (speech, question and answer, discussion group, watching videos, pictures, and PowerPoint files) that increased the perceived sensitivity in people. So In a session, a 12-year-old student, who had tooth decay and loss due to a lack of dental and oral self-care, was asked to talk about her problems that increased the perceived severity in people.That is consistent with the results of Ashoori et al. (2021) [38], Ghaffari et al. (2018) [39] and Ismael et al. (2019) [40].That indicates the effectiveness of the performed intervention program in increasing perceived sensitivity and perceived severity, as the factors affecting the behavior with a deficiency that should be taken into consideration by school teachers and health educators. Adolescents may realize the critical point of health situations if they do not feel vulnerable to them, so educators should help them deal with reality.

The results of this study show significant enhancement in average score of perceived barriers in experimental group. That is consistent with the results of Vaezipour et al. (2018) [41], Phanthavong et al. (2019) [42] And Moore et al. (2022) [43]. Among barriers to oral health are barriers related to the mother and family members (attitudes, inappropriate behaviors, and skills, mental, emotional, and knowledge conditions) as well as the barriers related to the child (skill), lack of dental health services, and dental knowledge [44,45,46]. In a study by Oveisi et al., [2019], perceived barriers were one of the strongest and most important predicting factors of students' behavior, which should be considered in planning school curricula [47]. According to the results of the present study, perceived barriers significantly decreased after the intervention in the intervention group compared to the control group. After the educational intervention, experimental group learn about the benefits of preventive behaviors from dental health and have less barriers for taking these behaviors. In current study, presenting educations about dental health and educational pamphlet help the increase of perceived benefits and dominating on barriers.Therefore, the model can be used as an effective model in decreasing perceived barriers to school students' oral health.

The results of this study show significant enhancement in average score of Perceived benefits in experimental group. That is consistent with the results of Noori Sistani et al. (2022) [30], Xiang et al. (2022) [48] AND Rahimzadeh et al. (2022) [49]. According to the results of Taheri et al., (2021), one of the most important predicting factors of oral health in students aged 10–12 years old was perceived benefits in the HBM model [50]. Perceived benefits are defined as the person's belief in the efficiency of the measures suggested to decrease the risk or threat [49]. It seems that, in the present study, the subjects learned about the dental self-care program and its effect on dental and oral disease prevention, the importance of participation in training sessions, and the importance of the regular dental visit that significantly increased the score of perceived benefit structure in the intervention group after they were explained the role of dental self-care behaviors in decreasing dental problems and tooth decay.

The results of this study show significant enhancement in average score of Self-efficacy in experimental group. which shows the effect of the educational intervention on the self-efficacy of the students, that is, the education of the students of the intervention group made them believe that they can take good care of their teeth and use the health recommendations efficiently. That is consistent with the results of Goodarzi et al. (2019) [23], Oveisi et al. (2019) [47] and Asawa et al. (2020) [51]. Self-efficiency refers to an individual's belief in his or her capacity to execute behaviors [49]. Students' belief in their capacity to execute appropriate dental and oral health behaviors can be effective in improving their self-efficiency. The structure of self-efficiency can be strongly associated with the incidence of a behavior; indeed, it is the cause of a behavior, which should be taken into consideration. An HBM-based interventional program can help improve self-efficacy and adopt useful dental self-care behaviors.

The results of this study show significant enhancement in average score of Self-care practice(behavior) in experimental group. That indicating the effect of education on student s’ dental health behavior after the educational intervention. That is consistent with the results of Asawa et al. (2020) [51], Kazemi et al. (2020) [52] and Aurlene et al. (2020) [53] studies. Therefore, it is suggested to use appropriate training interventions along with behavioral models and theories, such as the health belief model, to increase self-care performance and improve dental and oral health in students.

There was a significant relationship between the variable of family size and Father's education with the structure of behavioral intention, and the variable of Father's education with the structures of perceived severity, which was in line with the results of Dumitrescu(2014) [54]، Xiang (2022) [55] studies. According to what was discussed, a health behavior in the health belief model depends on two issues: first, the person's perception of the risk threatening him/her, and second, the perceived barriers and benefits of behavior. On the other hand, the relationship between behavioral intention and behavior showed that people tend to be involved in behaviors they have intended to do. In addition to the mentioned factors, appropriate health behavior is influenced by other factors such demographic characteristics of the student and her parents. The results showed that while designing school-based dental self-care interventional programs, the demographic characteristics of students and their parents, attitudes (perceived sensitivity, perceived severity), and students' behavioral intentions should be specifically considered. On the other hand, training elementary students is not enough, training parents and their participation along with new considerations to improve students' dental and oral health behaviors is an integrated part of the program. Self-report in health behaviors and lack of generalization of the results to other age and demographic groups can be mentioned as limitations of the present study. Therefore, it is suggested for further studies research other groups of participants. enother limitations, including the fact that Demographic characteristics of students and their parents are the factors affecting the dental health of students that was not under the control of the researcher.. Also,researchers don’t had the follow-up of the clinical effect[such as dental plaque, the amount of decay or filling tooths of the participants before and after intervention] of the current intervention in the two intervention groups and the control group at two time intervals before and 3 month after the intervention is another limitations of the present study. This debate has been somewhat alleviated by adding behavioral intention to the health belief model.

The strengths of the study were studying the vulnerable groups of children, being problem-based, and using the integrated behavioral model (HBM and the structure of behavioral intention in TPB) to improve students' dental self-care.

Conclusion

The results indicated that health training based on the health belief model and behavioral intention had a significant effect on increasing the scores of the health belief model and behavioral intention. Therefore, the Education authorities are required to adopt theory-based training programs to create and improve dental and oral self-care behaviors in students. Creating a culture of dental and oral health is one of the necessities in society. As the rates of tooth decay indicate in Iran and the world, the dental and oral health culture needs knowledge and awareness, which should be considered more in elementary schools. Presenting knowledge and information about the importance of oral health at a wider level of society, the media can be an important source of knowledge to communicate health messages to the public and play an effective role in improving dental and oral health. Students will live happier, more lively, and more physically and mentally healthy if they have healthy teeth. Thus, they should learn how to take care of their teeth. In this regard, theory-based educational materials on dental and oral self-care in the school curriculum can be beneficial.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. .DMFT index = Decayed (D), Missing (M), and Filled teeth (FT).

Abbreviations

DMFT:

Decayed Missing and Filled Teeth

HBM:

Health Belief Model

TPB:

Theory of planned behavior

References

  1. Abbas S, Chauhan R, Teotia S, Kumari S, Awasthi AA, Saeed S, Taneja N, Janardhanan R. A Cross-sectional Study on Self-assessment of Dental Health and Oral Hygiene Awareness among Delhi NCR Region. Int J Sci Study. 2020;8(8):22–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peres MA, Macpherson LM, Weyant RJ, Daly B, Venturelli R, Mathur MR, Listl S, Celeste RK, Guarnizo-Herreño CC, Kearns C, Benzian H. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. Lancet. 2019;394(10194):249–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31146-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kassebaum NJ, Smith AG, Bernabé E, Fleming TD, Reynolds AE, Vos T, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence, incidence, and disability-adjusted life years for oral conditions for 195 countries, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. J Dent Res. 2017;96:380–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Petersen PE, Ogawa H. The global burden of periodontal disease: towards integration with chronic disease prevention and control. Periodontol 2000. 2012;60(1):15-39.

  5. Frencken JE, Sharma P, Stenhouse L, Green D, Laverty D, Dietrich T. Global epidemiology of dental caries and severe periodontitis a comprehensive review. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(Suppl 18):S94-105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson LA. Biomedical informatics training for dental researchers. Adv Dent Res. 2003;17(1):29-33.

  7. Pakpour AH, Hidarnia A, Hajizadeh E, Kumar S, Harrison AP. The status of dental caries and related factors in a sample of Iranian adolescents. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16(6):822–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pakshir HR. Oral health in Iran. Int Dent J. 2004;54(6 Suppl 1):367–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moradi G, Mohamadi Bolbanabad A, Moinafshar A, Adabi H, Sharafi M, Zareie B. Evaluation of Oral Health Status Based on the Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT) Index. Iran J Public Health. 2019;48(11):2050–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. World health organization. WHO Discussion Paper: Draft Global Strategy On Oral Health. Accesed in: 9 August 2021. available at: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/who-discussion-paper-draft-global-strategy-on-oral-health.

  11. Watt RG, Daly B, Allison P, Macpherson LM, Venturelli R, Listl S, Weyant RJ, Mathur MR, Guarnizo-Herreño CC, Celeste RK, Peres MA. Ending the neglect of global oral health: time for radical action. Lancet. 2019;394(10194):261–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31133-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. George A, Sousa MS, Kong AC, Blinkhorn A, Patterson Norrie T, Foster J, Dahlen HG, Ajwani S, Johnson M. Effectiveness of preventive dental programs offered to mothers by non-dental professionals to control early childhood dental caries: a review. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nickbin Poshtamsary S, Emami Sigaroudi A, Farmanbar R, Radafshar G, Atrkar RZ. The effect of educational intervention based on the health belief model on oral and dental health behavior in pregnant women. J Holist Nurs Midwifery. 2020;30(3):182–90. http://hnmj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-1410-en.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Damyanov ND, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Dental status and associated factors in a dentate adult population in Bulgaria: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Dent. 2012;2012: 578401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu HX, Wong MC, Lo EC, McGrath C. Risk indicators of oral health status among young adults aged 18 years analyzed by negative binomial regression. BMC Oral Health. 2013;13:40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Álvarez L, Liberman J, Abreu S, et al. Dental caries in Uruguayan adults and elders: findings from the first Uruguayan National Oral Health Survey. Cad Saude Publica. 2015;31(8):1663–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Halawany HS, Al Badr A, Al Sadhan S, AlBalkhi M, Al-Maflehi N, Abraham NB, Jacob V, Al SG. Effectiveness of oral health education intervention among female primary school children in Riyadh. Saudi Arabia Saudi Dent j. 2018;30(3):190–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Michie S, West R, Sheals K, Godinho CA. Evaluating the effectiveness of behavior change techniques in health-related behavior: a scoping review of methods used. Transl Behav Med. 2018;8(2):212–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibx019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Shamsy M, Heidarnia A, Niknamy SH. Survy oral health care behaviors in pregnant mothers in Arak: applied health belief model. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2011;22(89):104–15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zaree M, Noroozy A, Tahmasby R. Investigate the factors influencing On Broush Behaviour in fifth and Six grade school in the city of Bushehr on the health belief model. J Nurs Midwifery, Tehran Univ Med Sci (Hayat ). 2012;19(2):67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shao C, Wang J, Liu J, Tian F, Li H. Effect of a Health Belief Model-based education program on patients’ belief, physical activity, and serum uric acid: a randomized controlled trial. Patient Preference Adherence. 2018;12:1239. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S166523.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Safary M. SHojaiizadeh D, GHofranipour F, Heidarnia A, Pakpoor H, Theories, models and methods of health education and health promotion. Sobhan Publ. 2012;2:79.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Goodarzi A, Heidarnia A, Tavafian SS, Eslami M. Predicting oral health behaviors among Iranian students by using health belief model. J Educ Health Promot. 2019;8:10. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_10_18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rahmati-Najarkolaei F, Rahnama P, Fesharaki MG, Yahaghi H, Yaghoubi M. Determinants of dental health behaviors of Iranian students based on the health belief model (HBM). Shiraz E Med J. 2016;17:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kasmaei P, Amin Shokravi F, Hidarnia A, Hajizadeh E, Atrkar-Roushan Z, Karimzadeh Shirazi K, Montazeri A. Brushing behavior among young adolescents: Does perceived severity matter. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kasmaei P, Amin Shokravi F, Hajizadeh, Atrkar-Roushan Z. Role of oral hygiene beliefs in regular brushing among the 9-10 years old female students. Health Educ Health Promot. 2013;1(3):45-58.

  27. Pakpour Hajiagha A, Saffari M. Predictors of Tooth Brushing Behavior in Iranian Adolescents: an Application of the Planned Behavior Theory . J Iran Dent Assoc. 2012; 24(4):159-63.

  28. Sanaeinasab H, Saffari M, Taghavi H, et al. An educational intervention using the health belief model for improvement of oral health behavior in grade-schoolers: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02132-2-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jeihooni AK, Jamshidi H, Kashf SM, Avand A, Khiyali Z. The efect of health education program based on health belief model on oral health behaviors in pregnant women of Fasa City, Fars Province, South of Iran. J Int Soc Prev Commun Dent. 2017;7(6):336–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Noori Sistani M, Karami S, Delavari HM. Promoting Oral health in Elementary students: Implementing Presentation and Practical Methods. Int J Pediatr. 2022;10(3):15640–52.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shaghaghian S, Zeraatkar M. Factors Affecting Oral Hygiene and Tooth Brushing in Preschool Children. Shiraz/Iran J Dent Biomater. 2017;4(2):394–402.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zareban I, Karimy M, Araban M, Delaney D. Oral self-care behavior and its influencing factors in a sample of school children from Central Iran. Arch Public Health. 2021;79(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Karimy M, Higgs P, Abadi SS, et al. Oral health behavior among school children aged 11–13 years in Saveh, Iran: an evaluation of a theory-driven intervention. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20:476. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02381-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Mirzaei M, Mazloomy S, Yassini S, Askarshahi M, Jalilian F, Zinat Motlagh F, et al. Fathers’ Behavioral Intention and Behavior in Prevention of Children Tendency toward Addictive Drugs. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2013;1(2):57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior: theory, research, and practice. 5th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley; 2015. p. 512.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Su CH. The Effect of Users’ Behavioral Intention on Gamification Augmented Reality in STEM (GAR-STEM) Education. J Baltic Sci Educ. 2019;18(3):450–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ajzen I, Kruglanski AW. Reasoned action in the service of goal pursuit. Psychol Rev. 2019;126(5):774.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ashoori F, Karimi M, Seif M. Comparison of the effect of mothers and students’ education on the promotion of oral health behaviours in female students, using the health belief model. Int J Dent Hyg. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ghaffari M, Rakhshanderou S, Ramezankhani A, Buunk-Werkhoven YA, Noroozi M, Armoon B. Are educating and promoting interventions effective in oral health?: A systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. 2018;16(1):48–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ismael HK, Mohammed Noori AK. Efficacy of the Health Belief Model in Enhancing the Oral Health of Female Middle School Students. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2019;10(9):1027-32.

  41. Vaezipour Z, Gharlipour Z, Mohebi S, Sharifirad G. Effect of education on promoting preventive behaviors of oral and dental problems: applying health belief model. Health Educ Health Promot. 2018;6(4):135–41. http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-13448-en.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Phanthavong S, Nonaka D, Phonaphone T, Kanda K, Sombouaphan P, Wake N, Sayavong S, Nakasone T, Phongsavath K, Arasaki A. Oral health behavior of children and guardians’ beliefs about children’s dental caries in Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR). PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1): e0211257. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Moore J, Bond K, Turner LW. Reducing Chronic Disease Risk through Positive Oral Health Practices: A Systematic Review of School-based Dental Health Programs. Am J Health Educ. 2022;53(3):133–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sahrai P, Keshavarz-Mohammadi N, Ghasemi H. Perceived Barriers of Mothers in Use of Dental Floss for their 3-6-Year-Old Children: A Qualitative Study. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2020;5(2):136–47.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hernandez Castaneda MA. he Severity and Barriers of Lack of Oral Health Care in the Population of College Students in Arizona. 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Marlecha R, Vinita M, Keshav A, Pradeep C, Nagavalli K, Salam H. Oral health status, dental awareness, and dental services utilization barriers among transgender population in Chennai. Drug Invent Today. 2020;14(7):1143-9.

  47. Oveisi S, Zahedifar F, Atashgar E, Yadegary Z, Amole N, Taherkhanee S. Prediction of Dental Caries Preventive Behaviors using Health Belief Model (HBM). Health Educ Health Promot. 2019;7(3):105–9.http://www.hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-24988-en.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Xiang B, McGrath CP, Wong HM. The Efficacy of a Multi-Theory-Based Peer-Led Intervention on Oral Health Among Hong Kong Adolescents: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. J of Adolesc Health. 2022;70(2):267–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rahimzadeh A, Faghih Solaimani P, Rahmani K, Bagheri S. Effect of a training intervention program designed based on health belief model on adopting behaviors preventing dental caries in students. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2018;6(3):266–76. https://doi.org/10.30699/acadpub.ijhehp.6.3.266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Taheri AM, Arabshahi A, Rahimi H, Gharlipour Z, Dehghanzadeh MR. Oral Health-Related Factors based on Health Belief Model in 10th to 12th-Grade Students in Kashan. J Educ Community Health. 2021;8(2):121–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Asawa K, Chakravarty T, Tak M, Rathod D, Sen N. Self-assessment of psychological and mechanical factors affecting oral hygiene among Indian college-going students: a model-guided study. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2020;40(4):307–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684X19885496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kazemi Z, Shojaeezadeh D, Jalili Z. The effect of educational interventions based on Health Belief Model (HBM) on puberty health behaviors in Tehran’s female elementary students, 2019. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2020;8(2):142–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Aurlene N, Manipal S. The effectiveness of health belief model as an educational intervention in improvement of oral hygiene: a systematic review. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2020;11(1):1-2003.

  54. Dumitrescu AL, Dogaru BC, Duta C, Manolescu BN. Testing five social-cognitive models to explain predictors of personal oral health behaviours and intention to improve them. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2014;12(4):345–55. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.a31662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Xiang B, Wong HM, Perfecto AP, McGrath CP. Modelling health belief predictors of oral health and dental anxiety among adolescents based on the Health Belief Model: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2022;20(1):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been taken from the Research Committee of the Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran (IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1394.884). I hereby thank the Vice-Chancellor of Research for approving this study and express my gratitude to the students, teachers, Education officials, and schools of Rudsar, who cooperated with me in performing the project.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Community Health, Child Nursing and Aging, Ramsar School of Nursing, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

    Fatemeh Mohammadkhah

  2. Department of Public Health, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Ali Ramezankhani

  3. Department of Psychology, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran

    Abolfazl Atashpoosh

  4. Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Rasht Branch, Rasht, Iran

    Farzaneh Ahmady Moghadam

  5. Department of Dental Public Health, School of Dental, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Maryam Bakhtiar

  6. Department of Public Health, School of Health, Nutrition Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Ali Khani Jeihooni

Authors
  1. Fatemeh Mohammadkhah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Ramezankhani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abolfazl Atashpoosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Farzaneh Ahmady Moghadam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maryam Bakhtiar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ali Khani Jeihooni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FM, AR, AA, FAM, MB and AKHJ assisted in conceptualization and design of the study, oversaw data collection, conducted data analysis and drafted the manuscript. FM, AR and AKHJ conceptualized and designed the study, assisted in data analysis and reviewed the manuscript. FM, AR, AA, FAM, MB and AKHJ assisted in study conceptualization and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Khani Jeihooni.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee at the Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran (IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1394.884). Informed consent was taken from all the participants. For students involved, informed consent from a parent and/or legal guardian was obtained in the study. All methods were carried out in accordance the declarations of Helsinki. There was an emphasis on maintaining privacy in keeping and delivering the information accurately without mentioning the names of the participants. The participants were given the right to leave the interview at any time, and they were promised to have access to the study results.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Appendix 1. Questionnaire.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadkhah, F., Ramezankhani, A., Atashpoosh, A. et al. Effect of training based on health belief model and behavioral intention on improving dental and oral self-care behavior in 9–12-year-old Iranian female students. BMC Oral Health 22, 515 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02552-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02552-0

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us