Skip to main content
Download PDF

Indicators of integrating oral health care within universal health coverage and general health care in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: a scoping review

BMC Oral Health volume 23, Article number: 251 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently devoted special attention to oral health and oral health care recommending the latter becoming part of universal health coverage (UHC) so as to reduce oral health inequalities across the globe. In this context, as countries consider acting on this recommendation, it is essential to develop a monitoring framework to measure the progress of integrating oral health/health care into UHC. This study aimed to identify existing measures in the literature that could be used to indicate oral health/health care integration within UHC across a range of low-, middle- and high-income countries.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted by searching MEDLINE via Ovid, CINAHL, and Ovid Global Health databases. There were no quality or publication date restrictions in the search strategy. An initial search by an academic librarian was followed by the independent reviewing of all identified articles by two authors for inclusion or exclusion based on the relevance of the work in the articles to the review topic. The included articles were all published in English. Articles concerning which the reviewers disagreed on inclusion or exclusion were reviewed by a third author, and subsequent discussion resulted in agreement on which articles were to be included and excluded. The included articles were reviewed to identify relevant indicators and the results were descriptively mapped using a simple frequency count of the indicators.

Results

The 83 included articles included work from a wide range of 32 countries and were published between 1995 and 2021. The review identified 54 indicators divided into 15 categories. The most frequently reported indicators were in the following categories: dental service utilization, oral health status, cost/service/population coverage, finances, health facility access, and workforce and human resources. This study was limited by the databases searched and the use of English-language publications only.

Conclusions

This scoping review identified 54 indicators in a wide range of 15 categories of indicators that have the potential to be used to evaluate the integration of oral health/health care into UHC across a wide range of countries.

Peer Review reports

Background

In 2015, the Member States of the United Nations (UN) set Universal Health Coverage (UHC) as one of the targets to be achieved by 2030 as a part of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) agreement (Target 3.8) [1]. This target was reasserted in the United Nations General Assembly High-Level Meeting on UHC in 2019 [2]. UHC has been defined as “the desired outcome of health system performance, whereby all people who need the full spectrum of health services (that is, promotion, prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, and palliation) receive them according to need, without resulting in hardship (including possible impoverishment caused by out-of-pocket payments) because of any associated health care costs” [3].

Countries are making progress towards UHC, and governments have set different strategies to move towards this goal [3]. These strategies follow the main elements of UHC: access, coverage, service quality, and financial protection [3]. Moreover, a direct correlation exists between achieving progress towards UHC and progressing in additional health goals [2]. This is because sustainable improvements in UHC enhance populations’ health and economic well-being [1, 2]. UHC is a guiding principle for providing health services for a wide range of people and health problems, including oral health problems. Therefore, oral health care services could, and indeed should, also be defined as part of UHC principles to provide accessible and affordable services to a community.

The 2017 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study reports indicated that around 3.5 billion people are affected by oral diseases globally, including untreated caries in permanent teeth as the most common non-communicable disease (NCD) [4]. Severe periodontal diseases and oral cancer are also oral health conditions that raise the incidence rate of populations’ oral disease levels in different parts of the world [4]. Furthermore, treatment costs, out-of-pocket payments, and lack of access to oral health care services additionally affect populations’ oral health [5]. Therefore, in 2019, oral health was included in the WHO Political Declaration on UHC, with the aim of promoting accessible and affordable oral health care services throughout the world [2]. Additionally, oral care services are included in the UHC Compendium, which is a database that assists countries in achieving progress towards UHC [6].

Along the same lines of the UHC strategies, in 2020, a The Lancet Commission on Global Oral Health [7] was established to reflect on different plans and policies for the improvement of oral health and the revision of dental health care services globally to make oral health and oral health care more accessible for all people, particularly those with the highest burden of disease and the poorest access to care.

In 2021, the WHO published specific resolutions on oral health during their 148th session, and in the World Health Assembly resolution WHA74.5, explicitly mentioned repositioning oral health as part of the global health agenda in the context of the UHC [8, 9]. The resolution addressed delivering oral health services as part of UHC and drafting a global strategy for implementing the most efficient and effective interventions in public oral health systems across the world. Accompanying this, the WHO engaged to develop a global oral health strategy and accompanying action plan setting a framework to assess the progress of oral health care integration into UHC [8, 9].

Around the same time but as a separate initiative, the World Dental Federation (Federation Dentaire Internationale; FDI), which comprises national associations of dentists across the globe, published the “FDI Vision 2030” report addressing the assimilation of good quality, essential oral health services into the general medical health care system in every country by the year 2030 [10]. This vision stated that the combination of oral and general person-centred health care results in more effective prevention and management of oral diseases [10].

Taken together, these separate initiatives of a Lancet Commission, the WHO and the FDI indicate that there is a strong world view to integrate oral health care into general health care and into UHC.

To evaluate UHC implementation in a country, recommendations have been made on setting up a monitoring framework based on various elements [3]. The suggested elements may differ from one country to another because economic, social, health care system, and other factors differ [3]. The two main indicators being used to measure the progress of UHC as SDG target 3.8 are essential health services coverage and financial risk protection against service costs (financial hardship) [11, 12]. Based on these two indicators, the World Bank and the WHO built a framework (referred to as the WHO/WB framework in the rest of this article) to monitor the implementation and progress of UHC in health systems [13]. This WHO/WB framework includes a selection of fourteen key indicators classified in four main categories: (i) reproductive, maternal, new-born, and child health; (ii) infectious diseases; (iii) non-communicable diseases; and (iv) service capacity and access [14]. Most of the 14 key indicators in these categories assess factors that are recognized to be common across many countries [14]. However, among the suggested indicators, there are no measures that involve or are specific to oral health and/or dental care. If progress is to be made in the aforementioned vision of integrating oral health care into general health care and UHC, it is not possible to evaluate progress within and across nations without clear, agreed-upon indicators. Setting up a monitoring framework including such indicators is crucial to evaluate the progress towards these goals in any community, whether national or global. Furthermore, given the global outlook of the aforementioned organizations, it is crucial to identify indicators of the integration of oral health care into general health care and UHC for a broad range of countries. If we are to address this issue from a global perspective, consideration needs to be given to low-, middle- and high-income countries, as well as those that already have UHC or not and multiple other factors that will differ across countries.

In this context, the aim of this project was to identify indicators that that have the potential to demonstrate the extent to which oral health care is integrated within general health care and UHC across a broad range of low-, middle-, and high-income countries.

Methods

A scoping review “provides a preliminary assessment of the potential size and scope of available research literature. It aims to identify the nature and extent of research evidence (usually including ongoing research)” [15]. This scoping review aimed to identify indicators relevant to the integration of oral health care into UHC and general health care. It was conducted based on Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework for scoping reviews [16]. Based on the research question, an academic medical librarian (MM) developed a search strategy for exploring related literature in the MEDLINE via Ovid database. The search strategy was converted for CINAHL and Ovid Global Health databases in advance (Table 1). Following the aforementioned definition of a scoping review focusing on research literature, we decided not to search grey literature. The databases were searched using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) or their equivalent, keywords, truncations, and adjacency operators; these terms were combined using standard Boolean operators. Universal health coverage, universal health insurance, oral health, and dental health services were defined as key concepts for the search strategy. The searches were carried out on May 13, 2021 and updated on September 16, 2021. No language, publication date, geographic limit, or quality restrictions (including primary study articles, reviews, meeting abstracts, conference proceedings, book chapter reviews/articles, and commentaries) were applied.

Table 1 Search strategy (developed for searching Medline)
Full size table

Six hundred and eleven (611) document records were identified through searching the above-mentioned databases. The exclusion of the duplicates resulted in 415 records. Two team members screened the 415 articles’ titles and abstracts independently to explore the documents potentially relevant to the aim of the study and the research question. Following this primary title/abstract screening, 114 articles were removed from the search list as they were either unrelated to the primary concept of the study or in languages other than English. The result was that 301 articles were fully reviewed by two team members independently. The goal of this project was to identify indicators that could be used to measure a health care system’s progress towards integrating oral health care into UHC. In view of this, we included articles with indicators of service utilization, insurance coverage, care expenses, health facility access, health status, health care providers, knowledge of health, availability and acceptability of services, need and demand for dental care, health policies, fluoride, oral hygiene, and Infection control. The search strategy shown in Table 1 shows the precise terms used as the inclusion keywords. Articles that had no suggestions on indicators were excluded. Eighty-three articles were retained after the application of these inclusion and exclusion criteria. Articles that the two reviewers disagreed on were reviewed by a third author, and agreement with the original reviewers reached on articles to be included. The article assessment process is displayed in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart (see Fig. 1. Article selection procedure for the scoping review PRISMA 2020 version) [17, 18].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Article selection procedure for the scoping review PRISMA 2020 version

Full size image

Once the articles to be included were agreed, a data extraction was developed and piloted. The two reviewers appraised ten articles and evaluated their results to ensure the process’s reliability by identifying differences and reaching agreement on how to report these differences through the process. The data extracted from each article were: the articles’ DOI/web address; publication year; country of origin; and a detailed description of the indicator(s). This process was performed independently by two reviewers. Relevant indicators were then extracted from included articles. Ultimately, the data were collected and descriptively mapped based on a simple frequency count of the indicators.

No ethical approval was needed as this study was based on already published data.

Results

Reviewing the 83 included articles resulted in distinct categories of indicators relevant to the topic of interest. Included articles were published in English and covered a wide range of 32 low-, middle- and high-income countries, although work from only one low-income country was identified among these countries. The publication dates spanned 1995 to 2021.

This scoping review identified a total of 54 different indicators. In particular, 34 indicators were classified under 14 main categories, describing indicator definitions, specific terms used to represent indictors, and variations by which indicators were measured in the studies. Six indicators were not assigned to any categories, and 14 indicators did not have specific definitions or clear examples. Different potential sources of data collection have been suggested in the table of results. These sources were: individuals in the population, dental professionals and government staff including public health officials.

Among the 14 defined categories, “dental service utilization” and “oral health status” were the categories with the highest numbers of potential indicators and/or the categories with indicators repeated most often. In the selected articles, “dental service utilization” included two indicators that were mentioned a total of 65 times in various formats among a wide range of high- to low-income countries. In addition, this category encompasses the most frequently monitored indicator, which is “Visiting a dentist in the past 12 months”. In the category “oral health status”, eight indicators were stated 58 times in various countries.

“Coverage” was a category with three indicators: “cost coverage”, “service coverage”, and “population coverage”. These indicators were reported 26 times in various formats among countries with diverse socioeconomic statuses. Financial coverage and out-of-pocket costs are indicated by “cost coverage”. “Service coverage” refers to the type of services covered by a plan and the term “population coverage” refers to which groups in the population are covered by a plan.

Another three indicators that were classified as the “finances” category were: “costs for the provider”, “costs/expenses for the patient”, and “funding sources”, which were stated 22 times in several countries. “Health facility access” included three indicators named “geographic access”, “health facility access”, and “home care”. These indicators were mentioned 21 times in different countries.

The remaining categories of the identified indicators were “workforce”, “knowledge of oral health”, “fluoride”, “oral hygiene”, “availability and acceptability of services”, “need and demand for dental care”, “diet”, “policies” and “infection control”. The indicators classified under these categories were reported fewer times and in a limited number of countries compared to the aforementioned indicators. The results have been comprehensively demonstrated in Table 2.

Table 2 Table of results
Full size table

Discussion

In recent years, special attention has been directed by a range of international organizations and groups to oral health care and its integration into UHC. To ensure progress is made in this integration process, it is important to have a monitoring framework incorporating relevant indicators. This framework should be adaptable to monitor progress in a range of low-, middle-and high-income countries. It should also be simple, practical, and comprehensive to cover all relevant oral health care domains. Currently, there is no such framework available to monitor the implementation of oral health care into the UHC, although this is being developed as part of the preparation of a global oral health action plan by the WHO. This framework and the aforementioned WHO plan need to use relevant indicators to track how the integration process is progressing in countries across the world. This scoping review has identified oral health care indicators that could be used as part of a global monitoring framework for oral health care integration into UHC and general health care.

Different frameworks are being used to monitor UHC development in a range of countries and health systems. For instance, the WHO/WB framework has been used as the main framework in many countries, although these countries adjusted the framework to measure the progress of UHC in the desired health care scopes, based on the needs of their populations. These country-specific frameworks have many similarities but also have some differences in accordance with the different regions of the world in which they are being used [102, 103].

In the context of the review reported in this paper, it is interesting to note that we can see how most of the indicators we identified fit into these existing frameworks developed for a broad range of health services beyond oral health care. For instance, “visit an oral health care facility or an oral health professional” was the most frequently reported indicator in our scoping review and it is similar to an indicator such as the “number of antenatal and postnatal visits”, which was used in the WHO/WB framework and its country-specific versions used in a range of countries such as Bangladesh, Iraq, South Africa, and India [14, 102,103,104,105]. Similarly, “Oral health status” indicators were the second most frequent set of indicators found in the literature. They cover a wide range of indicators from “DMFT” to “craniomandibular dysfunction” and “oral health condition”. The WHO/WB framework focuses on NCD health status indicators such as “blood pressure”, “blood glucose”, and “cervical cancer prevalence” to monitor the general health status of the population [14, 106]. Similar to that, other frameworks used various health status indicators as treatment indicators [103, 107,108,109]. Therefore, oral health status indicators could fit into the existing frameworks with the same aim.

On top of these examples, “Cost-, service-, and population-coverage” were coverage indicators reported numerously in the oral health care literature, and they are essentially the same as “coverage of the health services” and “financial protection”, which were the two main components used in the WHO/WB framework [13]. Furthermore, “service coverage” was the key indicator for developing the WHO/WB framework to follow UHC implementation in health systems [3, 14]. These three coverage indicators are the three main components of UHC that could be used as leading indicators for monitoring progress in integrating dental care within UHC [110]. They enable us to understand the progress towards the target of achieving UHC in different health systems.

As well as these examples of how oral health indicators mirror those of general health care indicators, additional ones can also be provided for indicators in “health facility access” and “workforce” categories. That said, it is important to note that some oral indicators we identified do not have general health care peers. “Fluoride exposure” and “oral hygiene” were oral health-related indicators that will not fit into the existing monitoring frameworks such as the WHO/WB framework, and the aforementioned regional and country modified frameworks. Indicators related to the “need and demand for dental care”, “policies”, and “infection control” domains were also found in the oral health care literature that could not be found in the existing monitoring frameworks. Among other suggested indicators, these indicators might be used as future measures to assess the UHC progress, although some could not be measured as system variables (such as “diet”).

Among the indicators identified in this review, there are a number that are relatively straightforward to collect, while others are more complex to both define and collect. Among the former group are indicators that have been used many times and can be collected relatively easily to monitor progress. For example, the “proportion of the population visiting a dental health care professional once a year” and “insurance coverage”. These are relatively straightforward to define and collect for instance through system administrative data or through self-complete surveys. However, there are a number of indicators we identified whose definition is unclear and may vary across countries, such as “awareness of oral health” and “need and demand for dental care”. These indicators illustrate well both the possibility of different definitions and the subsequently different means and so the feasibility of collecting the data. For example is the need for oral health care defined by clinicians (requiring a clinical examination), by people in the population (requiring a self-complete survey) or through administrative data (e.g. as defined by having had no consultation over a period of x years)? Added to the complexity of collecting such data is the expense, particularly for performing clinical examinations.

This scoping review was conducted to identify potential oral health care-related indicators for monitoring the implementation of oral health care into UHC and general health care. The results of this study were limited as we only searched a few databases, and in particular, we did not search the so-called “grey literature” of government survey reports on oral health and oral health care, which contain many examples of the types of indicators we were searching for. Furthermore, the limited number of databases restricted the scope of this research in terms of identifying indicators in various sociocultural contexts. In addition, the list of countries that the identified indicators were drawn from featured just one low-income country. This finding may be attributed to the previously discussed limitations of the study or may suggest significant constraints related to scarcity of resources in low-income countries. Another limitation was that we included only publications written in English. Although the results covered a broad range of oral health care categories, some areas could be missing. Consulting professional experts in the field could help transcend this limitation. Indeed, we believe the indicators identified by this search are an initial step in identifying a collection of indicators relevant to a wide range of countries, which could be complemented by others that are more specific to countries in particular regions of the world or low-, middle- and high-income groups.

Conclusions

There is a need for a monitoring framework to evaluate the progress of oral health care integration into UHC and general health care. This scoping review identified indicators in a wide range of oral health care domains relevant to the integration of oral health care into UHC and general health care. Many of these indicators were relevant to all forms of health care, including oral health care, whereas some were more specific for developing the oral health care monitoring framework. While it is possible that we missed some oral health care indicators in our review, when comparing our results with those of the WHO/WB framework, it seems we have included all the categories of indicators. Further studies, as well as interviews with experts, could be conducted with the aim of finding more indicators and choosing the most relevant ones to achieve a consensus on creating a practical and comprehensive monitoring framework for oral health care integration into UHC and general health care.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

WHO:

World Health Organization

UHC:

Universal Health Coverage

UN:

United Nations

SDGs:

Sustainable Development Goals

NCD:

Non-communicable Disease

FDI:

World Dental Federation (Federation Dentaire Internationale)

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

References

  1. General UN, Assembly. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 21 October 2015. A/RES/70/1, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html [accessed 12 May 2022].

  2. General UN, Assembly. Political declaration of the high-level meeting on universal health coverage. 18 October 2019. A/RES/74/2, available at: https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/74/2 [accessed 12 May 2022].

  3. Boerma T, Eozenou P, Evans D, Evans T, Kieny MP, Wagstaff A. Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage at country and global levels. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001731.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Global regional. National incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomson S, Cylus J, Evetovits T. Can people afford to pay for heatlh care? New evidence on financial protection in Europe. Kopenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe (WHO EURO); 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization. UHC Compendium/Explore the database. [cited 05 February 2023]. Available from: https://www.who.int/universal-health-coverage/compendium/database.

  7. University College London. The Lancet Commission on Oral Health. 2020. [cited 17 May 2022]. Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/epidemiology-health-care/research/epidemiology-and-public-health/research/dental-public-health/lancet-commission-oral-health.

  8. World Health Organization, EXECUTIVE BOARD. Oral health. Draft resolution proposed by Bangladesh, Bhutan, Botswana, Eswatini, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Jamaica, Kenya, Peru, Qatar, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Member States of the European Union. 148th session, Agenda item 6 ed: World Health Organization. ; 2021. p. 5.

  9. WHO SEVENTY-FOURTH WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY. Oral health. Agenda item 132. WHA74.5 ed. World Health Organization; 2021. p. 5.

  10. Glick M, Williams DM, Ben Yahya I, et al. Vision 2030: delivering optimal oral health for all. Geneva: FDI World Dental Federation; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization THE GLOBAL HEALTH OBSERVATORY. UHC service coverage index (3.8.1). 2022 [cited 21 February 2022]. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/4834.

  12. World Health Organization THE GLOBAL HEALTH OBSERVATORY. Population with household expenditures on health greater than 10% of total household expenditure or income (SDG 3.8.2). 2022 [cited 21 February 2022]. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/4844.

  13. World Health Organization, World Bank. Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage at country and global levels: framework, measures and targets. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. WHO/HIS/HIA/14.1.

    Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization; World Bank. 2021. Tracking Universal Health Coverage: 2021 Global Monitoring Report. World Health Organization and World Bank. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/36724. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

  15. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inform Libr J. 2009;26(2):91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Yuqing Z, Leveille SG, Ling S, Camhi SM, Zhang Y, Shi L. Disparities in preventive oral Health Care and Periodontal Health among adults with diabetes. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021;18:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Petersen PE, Davidsen M, Rosendahl Jensen H, Ekholm O, Illemann Christensen A. Trends in dentate status and preventive dental visits of the adult population in Denmark over 30 years (1987–2017).Eur J Oral Sci. 2021:e12809.

  21. Paurobally N, Kruger E, Tennant M. Are diabetes and dental care providers in the Republic of Mauritius advising patients about the importance of oral health in diabetes management? Int J Dental Hygiene. 2021;19(2):184–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Okamoto E. Japan’s Dental Care facing Population Aging: how Universal Coverage responds to the changing needs of the Elderly. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(17):04.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khamrin P, Boonyathee S, Bootsikeaw S, Ong-Artborirak P, Seangpraw K. Factors Associated with Health literacy, Self-Efficacy, Social Support, and oral Health Care Behaviors among Elderly in Northern Border Community Thailand. Clin Interv Aging. 2021;16:1427–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Galvao TF, Tiguman GMB, Pereira Nunes B, Correia da Silva AT, Tolentino Silva M. Continuity of primary care in the brazilian Amazon: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based study. Int J Prev Med. 2021;12:57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Galvao MHR, Medeiros AA, Roncalli AG. Contextual and individual factors associated with public dental services utilisation in Brazil: a multilevel analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(7):e0254310.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Clauss A, Sie A, Zabre P, Schmoll J, Sauerborn R, Listl S. Population-Based prevalence of oral conditions as a basis for Planning Community-Based interventions: an Epidemiological Study from Rural Burkina Faso. Front. 2021;9:697498.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Agrasuta V, Thumbuntu T, Karawekpanyawong R, Panichkriangkrai W, Viriyathorn S, Reeponmaha T, et al. Progressive realisation of universal access to oral health services: what evidence is needed? BMJ glob. 2021;6(7):07.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zivkovic N, Aldossri M, Gomaa N, Farmer JW, Singhal S, Quinonez C, et al. Providing dental insurance can positively impact oral health outcomes in Ontario. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Cooray U, Aida J, Watt RG, Tsakos G, Heilmann A, Kato H, et al. Effect of copayment on Dental visits: a regression discontinuity analysis. J Dent Res. 2020;99(12):1356–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pilotto LM, Celeste RK. The relationship between private health plans and use of medical and dental health services in the brazilian health system. Cienc. 2019;24(7):2727–36.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kino S, Bernabe E, Sabbah W. Social Inequalities in Use of Preventive Dental and Medical Services among adults in European Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(23):22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hernandez-Vasquez A, Bendezu-Quispe G, Azanedo D, Santero M. Use of oral health care services in Peru: trends of socio-economic inequalities before and after the implementation of Universal Health Assurance. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bakar NSA, Manual A, Hamid JA. Socioeconomic status affecting inequity of Healthcare Utilisation in Malaysia. Malays. 2019;26(4):79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dehmoobadsharifabadi A, Singhal S, Quinonez CR. Impact of public dental care spending and insurance coverage on utilization disparities among canadian jurisdictions. J Public Health Dent. 2018;78(4):346–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Caner A, Karaoglan D, Yasar G. Utilization of health-care services by young children: the aftermath of the turkish Health Transformation Program. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018;12:12.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wen PC, Lee CB, Chang YH, Ku LE, Li CY. Demographic and rural-urban variations in dental service utilization in Taiwan. Rural Remote Health. 2017;17(3):4161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nishide A, Fujita M, Sato Y, Nagashima K, Takahashi S, Hata A. Income-related inequalities in Access to Dental Care Services in Japan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(5):12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kiil A, Arendt JN. The effect of complementary private health insurance on the use of health care services. Int J Health Econ Manag. 2017;17(1):1–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Elstad JI. Dental care coverage and income-related inequalities in foregone dental care in Europe during the great recession. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017;45(4):296–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Raittio E, Aromaa A, Kiiskinen U, Helminen S, Suominen AL. Income-related inequality in perceived oral health among adult Finns before and after a major dental subsidization reform. Acta Odontol Scand. 2016;74(5):348–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Murakami K, Hashimoto H. Wealth-related versus income-related inequalities in dental care use under universal public coverage: a panel data analysis of the japanese study of Aging and Retirement. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Manski R, Moeller J, Chen H, Widstrom E, Listl S. Disparity in dental attendance among older adult populations: a comparative analysis across selected european countries and the USA. Int Dent J. 2016;66(1):36–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu J, Zhang SS, Zheng SG, Xu T, Si Y. Oral health status and oral Health Care Model in China. Chin J Dent Res. 2016;19(4):207–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Listl S. Countries with Public Dental Care Coverage have Lower Social Inequalities in the Use of Dental Services Than Countries without such Coverage. J Evidence-Based Dent Pract. 2015;15(1):41–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Boccolini CS, de Souza Junior PR. Inequities in Healthcare utilization: results of the brazilian National Health Survey, 2013. Intern. 2016;15(1):150.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sgan-Cohen H, Livny A, Listl S. Dental health among older israeli adults: is this a reflection of a medical care model inadequately addressing oral health? Int Dent J. 2015;65(1):49–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Adeleke CA, Eke JH, FACTORS AFFECTING UTILIZATION OF PRIMARY ORAL HEALTH, CARE SERVICES: A STUDY OF SELECTED POPULATION IN IBADAN. West Afr J Nurs. 2014;25(2):75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Somkotra T. Experience of socioeconomic-related inequality in dental care utilization among thai elderly under universal coverage. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13(2):298–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ruiz Gomez F, Zapata Jaramillo T, Garavito Beltran L. Colombian health care system: results on equity for five health dimensions, 2003–2008. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33(2):107–15. 6 p preceding.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Palència L, Espelt A, Rodríguez-Sanz M, Rocha B, Isabel Pasarín K, Borrell M. Trends in social class inequalities in the use of health care services within the Spanish National Health System, 1993–2006. Eur J Health Econ. 2013;14(2):211–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Guiney H, Felicia P, Whelton H, Woods N. Analysis of a payments database reveals trends in dental treatment provision. J Dent Res. 2013;92(7 Suppl):63S–9S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lebrun LA. Effects of length of stay and language proficiency on health care experiences among immigrants in Canada and the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(7):1062–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Garrido-Cumbrera M, Borrell C, Palencia L, Espelt A, Rodriguez-Sanz M, Pasarin MI, et al. Social class inequalities in the utilization of health care and preventive services in Spain, a country with a national health system. Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(3):525–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Somkotra T, Vachirarojpisan T. Inequality in dental care utilisation among thai children: evidence from Thailand where universal coverage has been achieved. Int Dent J. 2009;59(6):349–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sabates R, Feinstein L. Do income effects mask social and behavioural factors when looking at universal health care provision? Int J Public Health. 2008;53(1):23–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Allin S. Does equity in Healthcare Use vary across canadian provinces? Healthc Policy. 2008;3(4):83–99.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Schwarz E. Access to oral health care - an australian perspective. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006;34(3):225–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lasser KE, Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S. Access to care, health status, and health disparities in the United States and Canada: results of a cross-national population-based survey. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(7):1300–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Jones JA. Financing and reimbursement of elders’ oral health care: lessons from the present, opportunities for the future. J Dent Educ. 2005;69(9):1022–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Habicht J, Kunst AE. Social inequalities in health care services utilisation after eight years of health care reforms: a cross-sectional study of Estonia, 1999. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(4):777–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Graham MA, Tomar SL, Logan HL. Trends. Perceived social status, language and identified dental home among Hispanics in Florida. J Am Dent Association (JADA) (American Dent Association). 2005;136(11):1572–82.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ismail AI, Sohn W. The impact of universal access to dental care on disparities in caries experience in children. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132(3):295–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Suominen-Taipale AL, Widstrom E. A longitudinal study of young finnish adults’ use of subsidized, private sector dental care, 1986–1997. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000;28(5):365–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rajmil L, Borrell C, Starfield B, Fernandez E, Serra V, Schiaffino A, et al. The quality of care and influence of double health care coverage in Catalonia (Spain). Arch Dis Child. 2000;83(3):211–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Zimmerman M, Bornstein R, Martinsson T. Utilization of dental services in refugees in Sweden 1975–1985. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1995;23(2):95–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Roberts-Thomson K, Brennan DS, Spencer AJ. Social inequality in the use and comprehensiveness of dental services. Aust J Public Health. 1995;19(1):80–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Uguru N, Onwujekwe O, Uguru CC, Ogu UU. Achieving universal health coverage in Nigeria: the dilemma of accessing dental care in Enugu state, Nigeria, a mixed methods study. Heliyon. 2021;7(1):e05977.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Somkotra T, Detsomboonrat P. Is there equity in oral healthcare utilization: experience after achieving Universal Coverage. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009;37(1):85–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Cornejo-Ovalle M, Paraje G, Vasquez-Lavin F, Perez G, Palencia L, Borrell C. Changes in socioeconomic inequalities in the use of dental care following major healthcare reform in Chile, 2004–2009. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(3):2823–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Pulok MH, Gool Kv, Hall J. Horizontal inequity in the utilisation of healthcare services in Australia. Health Policy. 2020;124(11):1263–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Rosen B, Waitzberg R, Merkur S. Israel: health system review: Health Systems in Transition (European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies); 2015. 17(6):xxv + 212 pp. many ref.; 2015.

  72. Mathur MR, Williams DM, Reddy KS, Watt RG. Universal health coverage: a unique policy opportunity for oral health. J Dent Res. 2015;94(3 Suppl):3S–5S.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Kreider B, Manski RJ, Moeller J, Pepper J. The effect of dental insurance on the use of dental care for older adults: a partial identification analysis. Health Econ. 2015;24(7):840–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Nascimento AC, Moyses ST, Werneck RI, Moyses SJ. Oral health in the context of primary care in Brazil. Int Dent J. 2013;63(5):237–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Srinarupat J, Oshiro A, Zaitsu T, Prasertsom P, Niyomsilp K, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Inequalities in Periodontal Disease according to Insurance Schemes in Thailand. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Palm W, Webb E, Hernandez-Quevedo C, Scarpetti G, Lessof S, Siciliani L, et al. Gaps in coverage and access in the European Union. Health Policy. 2021;125(3):341–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Allin S, Farmer J, Quinonez C, Peckham A, Marchildon G, Panteli D, et al. Do health systems cover the mouth? Comparing dental care coverage for older adults in eight jurisdictions. Health Policy. 2020;124(9):998–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Zaitsu T, Saito T, Kawaguchi Y. The oral Healthcare System in Japan. Healthc (Basel). 2018;6(3):10.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Kerdpon D, Jantharapattana K, Sriplung H. Factors related to diagnostic delay of oral squamous cell carcinoma in southern Thailand: Revisited. Oral Dis. 2018;24(3):347–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Diop M, Kanoute A, Diouf M, Ndiaye AD, Lo CMM, Faye D, et al. The role of health insurance in the coverage of oral health care in Senegal. J Public Health Afr. 2018;9(3):174–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Ghanbarzadegan A, Balasubramanian M, Luzzi L, Brennan D, Bastani P. Inequality in dental services: a scoping review on the role of access toward achieving universal health coverage in oral health. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):404.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Uguru N, Onwujekwe O, Ogu UU, Uguru C. Access to oral health care: a focus on dental caries treatment provision in Enugu Nigeria. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Wang F, Wang J, Hung Y. Universal health insurance, health inequality and oral cancer in Taiwan. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(10).

  84. Jean G, Kruger E, Tennant M. Universal access to oral health care for australian children: comparison of travel times to public dental services at consecutive census dates as an indicator of progressive realisation. Aust J Prim Health. 2020;26(2):109–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Kim N, Kawachi I. Did the expansion of insurance coverage for oral health reduce self-reported oral health inequalities in Korea? Results of repeated cross-sectional analysis, 2007–2015. J Epidemiol. 2020;30(12):537–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Ito K, Cable N, Yamamoto T, Suzuki K, Kondo K, Osaka K, et al. Wider Dental Care Coverage Associated with lower oral health inequalities: a comparison study between Japan and England. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(15):31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Bernabe E, Marcenes W, Hernandez CR, Bailey J, Abreu LG, Alipour V, et al. Global, Regional, and national levels and Trends in Burden of oral conditions from 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease 2017 study. J Dent Res. 2020;99(4):362–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Verlinden DA, Reijneveld SA, Lanting CI, Wouwe JPv, Schuller AA. Socio-economic inequality in oral health in childhood to young adulthood, despite full dental coverage. Eur J Oral Sci. 2019;127(3):248–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Markovic D, Soldatovic I, Vukovic R, Peric T, Campus GG, Vukovic A. How much Country Economy Influences ECC Profile in Serbian Children-A Macro-Level factor analysis. Front. 2019;7:285.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Guarnizo-Herreno CC, Watt RG, Garzon-Orjuela N, Suarez-Zuniga E, Tsakos G. Health insurance and education: major contributors to oral health inequalities in Colombia. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019;73(8):737–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Pucca GA Jr, Gabriel M, Araujo, MEd. Almeida FCSd. Ten years of a national oral health policy in Brazil innovation, boldness, and numerous challenges. J Dent Res. 2015;94(10):1333–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Saekel R. China’s oral care system in transition: lessons to be learned from Germany. Int J Oral Sci. 2010;2(3):158–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Ziller S, Micheelis W, Oesterreich D, Reich E. Goals for oral health in Germany 2020. Int Dent J. 2006;56(1):29–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Hyman JJ, Reid BC, Mongeau SW, York AK. The military oral health care system as a model for eliminating disparities in oral health. J Am Dent Association (JADA) (American Dent Association). 2006;137(3):372–8.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Yang CH, Huang YT, Hsueh YS. Redistributive effects of the National Health Insurance on physicians in Taiwan: a natural experiment time series study. Intern. 2013;12:13.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Kashner TM. Research issues related to oral health expenditures and financing oral health care for the aging veteran. Med Care. 1995;33(11 Suppl):NS90–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Kailembo A, Preet R, Stewart Williams J. Socioeconomic inequality in self-reported unmet need for oral health services in adults aged 50 years and over in China, Ghana, and India. Intern. 2018;17(1):99.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Wang TT, Mathur MR, Schmidt H. Universal health coverage, oral health, equity and personal responsibility. Bull World Health Organ. 2020;98(10):719–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Shamim T. My experience as an educator, motivational, and collaborative dental professional in India. J. 2020;9(2):456–8.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Williams DM, Mossey PA, Mathur MR. Leadership in global oral health. J Dent. 2019;87:49–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Mumghamba EG, Joury E, Fatusi O, Ober-Oluoch J, Onigbanjo RJ, Honkala S. Capacity building and financing oral health in the African and Middle East Region. Adv Dent Res. 2015;27(1):32–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Taniguchi H, Rahman MM, Swe KT, Hussain A, Shibuya K, Hashizume M. Trends and projections of universal health coverage indicators in Iraq, 2000–2030: a national and subnational study. Soc Sci Med. 2021;270:113630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Rahman MS, Rahman MM, Gilmour S, Swe KT, Krull Abe S, Shibuya K. Trends in, and projections of, indicators of universal health coverage in Bangladesh, 1995–2030: a bayesian analysis of population-based household data. The Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(1):e84–e94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Day C, Gray A, Cois A, Ndlovu N, Massyn N, Boerma T. Is South Africa closing the health gaps between districts? Monitoring progress towards universal health service coverage with routine facility data. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Nambiar D, Sankar DH, Negi J, Nair A, Sadanandan R. Monitoring Universal Health Coverage reforms in primary health care facilities: creating a framework, selecting and field-testing indicators in Kerala, India. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(8):e0236169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Tracking universal health coverage. : 2017 global monitoring report. World Health Organization and International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

  107. Lozano R, Fullman N, Mumford JE, Knight M, Barthelemy CM, Abbafati C, et al. Measuring universal health coverage based on an index of effective coverage of health services in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1250–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Gupta RD, Shahabuddin A. Measuring Progress toward Universal Health Coverage: does the Monitoring Framework of Bangladesh need further improvement? Cureus. 2018;10(1):e2041.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Obare V, Brolan CE, Hill PS. Indicators for Universal Health Coverage: can Kenya comply with the proposed post-2015 monitoring recommendations? Intern. 2014;13(1):123.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Busse R, Schreyögg J, Gericke C. Analyzing Changes in Health Financing Arrangements in High-Income Countries A Comprehensive Framework Approach. Articles in other Journals and Books. 2007;1.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Canada

    Yassaman Karimi Jashni & Paul Allison

  2. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Canada

    Fatemeh Emari

  3. Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences and Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, Canada

    Martin Morris

Authors
  1. Yassaman Karimi Jashni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fatemeh Emari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin Morris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul Allison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YKJ prepared the project protocol, worked with the librarian to develop the search strategy, was one of the reviewers and prepared the first draft of this manuscript. FE assisted with reviewing the manuscript articles as the second reviewer and extracting data. MM developed the search strategy for the review. PA recommended the original concept of the review, advised on article selection as the third reviewer, and revised and modified the text of the draft manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Allison.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jashni, Y.K., Emari, F., Morris, M. et al. Indicators of integrating oral health care within universal health coverage and general health care in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: a scoping review. BMC Oral Health 23, 251 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02906-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02906-2

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us