Skip to main content
Download PDF

MicroRNA expression as a prognostic biomarker of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC): a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Oral Health volume 24, Article number: 406 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have indicated that microRNA (miRNA) expression in tumour tissues has prognostic significance in Tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) patients. This study explored the possible prognostic value of miRNAs for TSCC based on published research.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of multiple databases was conducted according to predefined eligibility criteria. Data were extracted from the included studies by two researchers, and HR results were determined based on Kaplan‒Meier curves according to the Tierney method. The Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale (NOS) and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) pro-GDT were applied to assess the quality of all studies. Publication bias was estimated by funnel plot, Egger’s rank correlation test and sensitivity analysis.

Results

Eleven studies (891patients) were included, of which 6 reported up-regulated miRNAs and 7 mentioned down-regulated miRNAs. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) from the prognostic indicator overall survival (OS) was 1.34 (1.25–1.44), p < 0.00001, indicating a significant difference in miRNA expression between TSCC patients with better or worse prognosis.

Conclusion

MiRNAs may have high prognostic value and could be used as prognostic biomarkers of TSCC.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) accounts for approximately 90% of all oral malignancies, resulting in the highest morbidity rates in the head and neck region worldwide [1,2,3]. When compared with OSCC at other sites, tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC), a principal subtype of oral cancer, represents 17.8% of occurrences and shares similarities in etiopathogenesis related to early regional lymph node metastasis [4,5,6,7] and malignant proliferation [8, 9]. Notably, despite the application of advanced therapies, the 5-year survival rate and quality of life for TSCC patients are not promising [1, 9]. Compared with the overt symptoms of advanced stage TSCC, assessments such as tissue biopsy are advantageous for identifying patients with early-stage disease and, as a result, increase the chances for better treatment and recovery [10,11,12]. Thus, in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for the primacy of early diagnosis and prevention, measures should be taken to achieve early discovery and diagnosis of TSCC with the purpose of prolonging and improving the quality of patients’ lives [10, 13].

According to current clinical practice, the present detection methods for TSCC include but not limited to brush biopsy, CT and MRI scanning, and tissue autofluorescence. Even though some of these applications are widely performed in routine clinical practice, there exist certain limitations, such as labour intensiveness, invasiveness and low sensitivity, that should not be ignored. Recent researches indicate that part of the genetic alterations for TSCC contain progressive change in DNA methylation, overexpression of carcinoembryonic antigen, histone modification and expression level alteration of miRNAs, etc. As a result, the epigenetic alterations, including DNA fragments in saliva [14, 15], immune-related gene transcript [16], the neutrophil-to‐lymphocyte ratio [17], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [18] and miRNA expression [19], could be used as the promising biomarkers for early-stage detection for prognosis, which bridge the defect of traditional Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging system [20]. In recent years, with the purpose of finding more reliable diagnostic techniques, research based on microRNA molecular mechanisms has become an important academic focus [10]. Studies have reported connections between miRNAs and predicting the prognosis of TSCC, as changes in miRNA expression can reflect the stage of a tumour to some extent.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are sophisticated epigenetic molecular markers linked to TSCC patient prognosis. Intrinsically, miRNAs are endogenous, noncoding, single-stranded RNA molecules that are approximately 20–24 nucleotides long and renowned for their conserved gene sequence and distinct expression patterns [21,22,23,24]. Generally, miRNAs are characterized by high gene sequence conservation, temporal expression specificity and tissue expression specificity [25]. By mediating dysregulation and translational repression, miRNAs regulate 30% of gene expression in the posttranscriptional stage [24, 25]. During the biological process of TSCC deterioration, miRNAs partly act as oncogenes or suppressor genes in carcinogenesis by dysregulation, as well as having an indirect impact on the expression of proto-oncogenes and cancer suppressor gene [26]. Followed by that, miRNA deteriorate tumour cell proliferation by escaping normal suppressing signals, expediting malignant cell migration and stimulating angiogenesis in tumours [21, 22, 24, 25].

Experiments based on miRNA as a biomarker of malignancy prognosis have made great progress in recent years. However, due to the comparatively high cost and complexity of the process, this technique has not been put into clinical use on a large scale. Distinct from existing meta-analyses of TSCC, this manuscript offers a fresh perspective, bridging the gap between the academic value of miRNAs and their usefulness in clinical applications. This meta-analysis aimed to consolidate and elucidate the prognostic significance of miRNAs in TSCC, paving the way for innovative clinical interventions to enhance patient longevity and quality of life.

Materials and methods

Protocol and registration

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [27], researchers executed a systematic review encompassing aspects such as protocol, inclusion criteria, search strategy, and outcomes. This systematic review has been catalogued on PROSPERO under the registration number CRD 42,023,391,953.

Eligibility criteria

Researchers focused on all retrospective cohort studies evaluating the association between variations in miRNA expression and prognostic survival metrics of TSCC. The criteria were based on the PICO elements: participants (patients diagnosed with TSCC), intervention (deregulated miRNA levels in TSCC patients), control (TSCC patients with normal miRNA expression levels), and outcome (prognosis differences in TSCC patients based on miRNA expression variance). Consequently, the PICO question was as follows: is there a difference in prognostic survival indexes between TSCC patients with dysregulation of miRNA expression and those with normal miRNA expression?

The inclusion criteria were studies that reported interrelated prognostic survival indexes, including hazard ratios (HRs), Kaplan–Meier curves and univariate or multivariate Cox regression between TSCC patients with low and high miRNA expression levels.

Regarding the exclusion criteria, non-English studies and those without prognostic survival indexes from which HRs could be extracted or inferred were excluded. Case reports, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, historical reviews and studies at high risk of bias were excluded. Studies that did not elaborate clinical outcomes or that reported content that was not relevant to clinical patients were likewise excluded.

Sources of information, research and selection

For reference inclusion, relevant articles were identified through literature retrieval from online databases. Specifically, non-English articles were excluded. Databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, were searched to retrieve relevant articles focusing on miRNA dysregulation in the prognosis of TSCC.

A search strategy combining the terms (Tongue Squamous Cell Cancer OR TSCC OR neoplasm OR cancer OR malignancy OR malignant neoplasm OR malignant neoplasms OR neoplasia) AND (prognosis OR prognostic factor OR prognostic factors) AND (MicroRNAs OR Micro RNA OR MicroRNA OR Primary MicroRNA OR Primary miRNA OR RNA, Small Temporal OR Small Temporal RNA OR miRNA OR miRNAs OR pre-miRNA OR pri-miRNA OR stRNA) was developed. Moreover, identified articles were scrutinized separately by reviewing the content of abstracts and full texts for eligible articles meeting the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis.

Data collection process and data characteristics

Investigators extracted data from studies that met the inclusion criteria and subsequently contrasted, collated and adopted the data mentioned above. If distinctions in data existed, one researcher expressed opinions that played a critical part in data selection. Data extracted from studies that met the inclusion criteria included Kaplan–Meier curves, first author and date, country, study design, number of patients, cut-off between low and high expression, miRNA types, miRNA expression levels and HRs of deregulated miRNA expression (OS, DSS, DFS, RFS, PFS). According to the Tierney method, prognostic index HR data, comprising overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS), were collected and extrapolated from Kaplan–Meier curves [28].

Risk of bias in individual studies, summary measures, summary of results, risk of bias between studies, and additional measures

Investigators evaluated the risk of bias in the studies respectively while ensuring the accuracy of the assessments. Under the guidance of reference factors derived from the Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale (NOS), each study was graded from 0 to 9. Those scoring above or equal to 7 were considered high-quality articles, while those scoring below 7 were eliminated from this meta-analysis. Forest plots were used to graphically illustrate the results mentioned above, and inconsistency indexes involving the Higgins index I² were used for evaluation. Software STATA 15.1 and Reviewer Manager 5.4 were used for statistical analysis. Collected data were aggregated to obtain a pooled sensitivity and specificity of OS, DSS, DFS, RFS and PFS. The risk of bias between the studies was assessed graphically through analysis of overlaps of the confidence intervals through the I² inconsistency index (an I² value greater than 50% was statistically significant, and a fixed-effect model was applied in specific cases). By using a funnel plot and Egger’s rank correlation test, publication bias was comprehensively estimated [29]. If the p value of Egger’s test was N > 0.05 and the funnel plot was symmetrical, there was no obvious publication bias in this meta-analysis. Subsequently, we carried out sensitivity analysis to accurately judge the heterogeneity of the selected studies.

Results

Study characteristics

A total of 403 bibliographic citations were initially identified, 240 were excluded due to repetition, and 140 others were excluded according to the eligibility criteria. Fourteen studies reported prognostic data for OSCC only and thus were excluded. Moreover, another 3 articles from Google Scholar that met the inclusion criteria were additionally included in the meta-analysis. In the end, 12 articles were included in our study and 11 of these articles were included in this meta-analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of studies selection process according to PRISMA guidelines

Full size image

Data characteristics

According to the characteristics of the extracted data mentioned in the Data Collection Process and Data Characteristics section, all the extracted data are shown in Table 1. All 12 included retrospective clinical studies with a follow-up period of 3 to 15 years and a total of 970 TSCC patients were published from 2009 to 2020. The studies by Jia et al. (2013) [30], Supic et al. (2018) [31], Zheng et al. (2016) [32], Jia et al. (2014) [33], Li et al. (2009) [34], Maruyama et al. (2018) [35], Xie et al. (2016) [36], Berania et al. (2017) [37], Jia et al. (2015) [38], W. Chen et al. (2019) [39], and S. Chen et al. (2019) [40] reported OS as a prognostic parameter; Kawakita et al. (2014) [41]used DSS; PFS was selected as another prognostic indicator by Berania et al. (2017) [37], and Maruyama et al. (2018) [35] regarded DFS as a prognostic index, while RFS was indicated by Supic et al. (2018) [31].

Table 1 Main characteristics extracted from the selected studies
Full size table

Risk of bias within studies

The risk of bias was assessed through factors derived from the NOS. According to the NOS guidelines, each study was graded from 0 to 9, and those scoring above or equal to 7 were considered high-quality studies (Table 2).

Table 2 The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) used for evaluating the risk of bias within Studies
Full size table

Additionally, GRADE pro-GDT was used to assess the quality of OS prognostic outcome (Table 3). The results indicated that the quality of the evidence is critical for the outcome.

Table 3 Evaluation of GRADE pro-GDT
Full size table

Correlation of miRNA expression with survival outcomes

HR extracted from the included studies was the primary index for assessing TSCC patients with up-regulated and down-regulated miRNA expression. A fixed model was chosen to calculate the pooled HR value (95% CI).

The prognostic outcome OS from different miRNA expression levels was represented by a forest plot (Fig. 2), showing a pooled HR of 1.34 (1.25–1.44); heterogeneity of Chi2 = 13.90; df = 12 (p = 0.31); I2 = 14%; and test for the overall effect of Z = 8.01 (p < 0.00001).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot of the OS prognostic outcome of the meta-analysis

Full size image

Moreover, even if the prognostic outcomes of DFS PFS RFS DSS were excluded from our meta-analysis in reason of only one study was included in each group, these outcomes still indicated great statistical significance in demonstrating miRNA as a plausible prognostic biomarker for TSCC patients.

DFS was regarded as a prognostic indicator, the HR was 3.06 (1.32–7.12) with a test for the overall effect of Z = 0.19 (p = 0.009) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Forest plot of DFS outcome

Full size image

PFS was considered as a prognostic index, whose data were collected from the study, the HR was 2.31 (1.28,4.17), and the test for the overall effect was Z = 2.78 (p = 0.005) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot of PFS outcome

Full size image

The HR of another prognostic indicator RFS was 1.31 (0.97,1.78), and the test for the overall effect was Z = 1.74 (p = 0.08) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plot of RFS outcome

Full size image

The HR of DSS prognostic indicator was 1.08 (0.87–1.34) and a test for the overall effect was Z = 0.69 (p = 0.49) (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Forest plot of DSS outcome

Full size image

Heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis

There was no significant heterogeneity in this meta-analysis. To ascertain the effect of each included study on the pooled HR, we conducted a sensitivity analysis. With each study excluded successively, the remaining studies were meta-analysed, and the results of pooled HRs were observed. Eventually, the results suggested that no study had an influence on the pooled HR, which means that the results of the meta-analysis were statistically stable (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Outcome of sensitivity analysis to assess the heterogeneity in this meta-analysis

Full size image

Publication Bias

A funnel plot and Egger’s test were conducted to assess publication bias. According to the figure displayed, there was no visible asymmetry shown by the funnel plot (Fig. 8). To be more accurate, Egger’s test was performed to assess publication bias, and the results showed p = 0.063 (≥ 0.05). Thus, there was no statistically significant indication of publication bias, which verified that our results were relatively stable (Fig. 9).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Funnel plot for the main outcome in the fixed-effects model

Full size image
Fig. 9
figure 9

Egger’s test conducted to estimate publication bias; p = 0.063 (≥ 0.05)

Full size image

Discussion

Of the different OSCC subtypes, TSCC has the highest morbidity rate [1], with a low 5-year survival rate despite advancements in treatment during recent years [2, 4]. To extend and improve the quality of patients’ lives, studies have investigated novel indicators targeting tumorigenesis and tumour metastasis, including but not limited to centromeric probes, gene expression profiling and standard karyotyping [5]. Among these possible methods, miRNAs providing regulatory mechanisms based on their expression level have become a hotspot among academic research. Previous studies confirmed down-regulated miRNAs (miR-26a, miR-137, miR-139-5p, miR-143-3p, miR-184, miR-375, miR-32, miR-20a, miR-16 and miR-125b) and up-regulated miRNAs (miR-21, miR-31, miR-134, miR-155, miR-196a, miR-196b, miR-218, miR-455-5p, miR-372 and miR-373) in TSCC prognosis [42,43,44,45]. In general, miRNAs are expected to be advanced epigenetic biomarkers in the prognosis and optimized therapy of TSCC [46,47,48].

In this meta-analysis, the researchers included 11 articles and 891 patients. The investigators further summarized and proposed miRNA expression as a prognostic biomarker for TSCC survival. From the researchers’ review, the pooled HR of the prognostic outcome overall survival (OS) was 1.34 (1.25–1.44), elucidating the potential prognostic value of miRNA expression in TSCC patients. This meta-analysis demonstrated the high feasibility of applying miRNA as a prognostic biomarker in TSCC. Nevertheless, further investigation and improvement are needed.

Based on the included studies and forest plots mentioned above, the expression levels of miRNA-18a, miRNA-611, miRNA-21, miRNA-183, and miRNA-196a-5p significantly increased, whereas those of miRNA-548b, miRNA-5787, miRNA-195, miRNA-26a, miRNA-357, and miRNA-320a apparently decreased, revealing that abnormal expression of miRNAs could be considered a signal for poor prognosis. In addition, miRNA-21, miRNA-183 and miRNA-18a have already been suggested in multiple studies as potential prognostic indicators of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma or oral squamous cell carcinoma [44, 45]. Furthermore, recent studies have made new progress in considering miRNA-5787 and miRNA-357 as TSCC prognostic biomarkers [38, 39]. Altogether, this review offers a new perspective on addressing refractory TSCC prognosis.

With respect to the statistical process, this meta-analysis applied the NOS to assess the quality of selected retrospective cohort studies. According to the criteria of this protocol, 11 included studies scored more than 7 points, which means that they had a low risk of bias and high quality. Pooled HRs (95% CI) of prognostic factors extracted from the forest plot was OS-1.34 (1.25–1.44), which implied low heterogeneity. Additionally, researchers determined that the data collected were credible and accurate enough to demonstrate miRNA as a plausible prognostic biomarker for TSCC patients via sensitivity analysis and Egger’s test.

Nevertheless, the limitations of this meta-analysis should not be ignored. First, it is inevitable that the quantity of patients included is relatively insufficient since supplementary cases could enhance credibility. Second, due to the intrinsic deficiency of the Kaplan‒Meier curve, it is difficult for researchers to verify part of the accuracy of the initial results since extraction based on image capture could not be perfected. Third, due to limited resources in online databases, the cases contained were entirely extracted from only East Asia and American countries, which obviously led to regional limitations. Hence, patients from other nations could not completely benefit from the current results. Therefore, these problems must be scientifically addressed in future studies.

During the information retrieval process, the investigators noted that exosome research, especially involving miRNAs, has drawn much attention from academic communities and has even been experimentally used as diagnostic and prognostic tools in several types of malignant tumors [49, 50]. In comparison with other advanced techniques for prognosing TSCC, miRNA expression levels provide an original method for preventing recurrence and evaluating therapeutic effects. Not only could miRNA expression prospectively be used as a biomarker of residual or recrudescent TSCC malignant tissue, but it could also be utilized to make more accurate prognoses prior to clinical manifestations, which has significance for the timely initiation of adequate treatment. In summary, this meta-analysis aimed to contribute to the development of novel treatments and provide persuasive references for practical clinical applications and therapeutic guidance to some extent.

Conclusion

In conclusion, in this meta-analysis, the data extracted from the OS prognostic outcome suggest that alterations, including up-regulation and down-regulation of miRNA expression levels, could be used as promising prognostic factors of TSCC. According to the figures and tables presented above, the down-regulated miRNAs correlated with poor prognosis are miR-195, miR-26a, miR-320a, miR-548b, miR-375 and miR-5787, while the up-regulated miRNAs are miR-183, miR-21, miR-196a-5p, miR-18a, and miR-611. Given the limitations of the existing studies, it is necessary to conduct repetitive studies with more statistical tests and large-scale experiments that include patients from various regions and nations as well as various age groups. Consequently, this meta-analysis could provide references and prerequisites for further clinical trials and therapeutic applications.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

miRNA:

microRNA

HR:

hazard ratio

OSCC:

Oral squamous cell carcinoma

NOS:

Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale

WHO:

World Health Organization

OS:

overall survival

DSS:

disease-specific survival

DFS:

disease-free survival

RFS:

recurrence-free survival

PFS:

progression-free survival

References

  1. Ding L, Fu Y, Zhu N, Zhao M, Ding Z, Zhang X, Song Y, Jing Y, Zhang Q, Chen S, et al. OXTR(High) stroma fibroblasts control the invasion pattern of oral squamous cell carcinoma via ERK5 signaling. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg M, Manzi A, Birdi A, Laporte B, Conway P, Cantin S, Mishra V, Singh A, Pearson AT, Goldberg ER, et al. A nanoengineered topical transmucosal cisplatin delivery system induces anti-tumor response in animal models and patients with oral cancer. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4829.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Li Z, Fu R, Wen X, Zhang L. Network analysis reveals miRNA crosstalk between periodontitis and oral squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang L, Luo EL, Xie J, Gan RH, Ding LC, Su BH, Zhao Y, Lin LS, Zheng DL, Lu YG. FZD2 regulates cell proliferation and invasion in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15(11):2330–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Weatherspoon DJ, Chattopadhyay A, Boroumand S, Garcia I. Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer incidence trends and disparities in the United States: 2000–2010. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;39(4):497–504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Xie N, Wang C, Liu X, Li R, Hou J, Chen X, Huang H. Tumor budding correlates with occult cervical lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in clinical early-stage tongue squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2015;44(4):266–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao W, Cui Y, Liu L, Qi X, Liu J, Ma S, Hu X, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Li H, et al. Splicing factor derived circular RNA circUHRF1 accelerates oral squamous cell carcinoma tumorigenesis via feedback loop. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27(3):919–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li HF, Liu YQ, Shen ZJ, Gan XF, Han JJ, Liu YY, Li HG, Huang ZQ. Downregulation of MACC1 inhibits invasion, migration and proliferation, attenuates cisplatin resistance and induces apoptosis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2015;33(2):651–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Xi L, Yang Y, Xu Y, Zhang F, Li J, Liu X, Zhang Z, Du Q. The enhanced genomic 6 mA metabolism contributes to the proliferation and migration of TSCC cells. Int J Oral Sci. 2022;14(1):11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Abu-Ghanem S, Yehuda M, Carmel NN, Leshno M, Abergel A, Gutfeld O, Fliss DM. Elective neck dissection vs observation in early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue with no clinically apparent Lymph node metastasis in the neck: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142(9):857–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pich O, Bailey C, Watkins TBK, Zaccaria S, Jamal-Hanjani M, Swanton C. The translational challenges of precision oncology. Cancer Cell. 2022;40(5):458–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun L, Kang X, Wang C, Wang R, Yang G, Jiang W, Wu Q, Wang Y, Wu Y, Gao J, et al. Single-cell and spatial dissection of precancerous lesions underlying the initiation process of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Discov. 2023;9(1):28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hussein AA, Forouzanfar T, Bloemena E, de Visscher J, Brakenhoff RH, Leemans CR, Helder MN. A review of the most promising biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis prediction of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2018;119(6):724–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rapado-González Ó, López-Cedrún JL, Lago-Lestón RM, Abalo A, Rubin-Roger G, Salgado-Barreira Á, López-López R, Muinelo-Romay L, Suárez-Cunqueiro MM. Integrity and quantity of salivary cell-free DNA as a potential molecular biomarker in oral cancer: a preliminary study. J Oral Pathol Med. 2022;51(5):429–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou Y, Liu Z. Saliva biomarkers in oral disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2023;548:117503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen Y, Feng Y, Yan F, Zhao Y, Zhao H, Guo Y. A Novel Immune-related gene signature to identify the Tumor Microenvironment and Prognose Disease among patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma patients using ssGSEA: a Bioinformatics and Biological Validation Study. Front Immunol. 2022;13:922195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mariani P, Russo D, Maisto M, Troiano G, Caponio VCA, Annunziata M, Laino L. Pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an independent prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2022;51(1):39–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Diana R, Pierluigi M, Dardo M, Claudia A, Rosario R, Luigi L. The prognostic role of pre-treatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2023;23(4):101898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bigagli E, Locatello LG, Di Stadio A, Maggiore G, Valdarnini F, Bambi F, Gallo O, Luceri C. Extracellular vesicles miR-210 as a potential biomarker for diagnosis and survival prediction of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. J Oral Pathol Med. 2022;51(4):350–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Russo D, Mariani P, Caponio VCA, Lo Russo L, Fiorillo L, Zhurakivska K, Lo Muzio L, Laino L, Troiano G. Development and validation of prognostic models for oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and appraisal of the literature. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(22).

  21. Jadhav KB, Nagraj SK, Arora S. miRNA for the assessment of lymph node metastasis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and metanalysis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2021;50(4):345–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee YS, Dutta A. MicroRNAs in cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2009;4:199–227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Vishnoi A, Rani S. miRNA biogenesis and regulation of diseases: an updated overview. Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2595:1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yete S, Saranath D. MicroRNAs in oral cancer: biomarkers with clinical potential. Oral Oncol. 2020;110:105002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Budakoti M, Panwar AS, Molpa D, Singh RK, Büsselberg D, Mishra AP, Coutinho HDM, Nigam M. Micro-RNA: the darkhorse of cancer. Cell Signal. 2021;83:109995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Di Stasio D, Romano A, Boschetti CE, Montella M, Mosca L, Lucchese A. Salivary miRNAs expression in potentially malignant disorders of the oral mucosa and oral squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study on miR-21, miR-27b, and miR-181b. Cancers (Basel) 2022, 15(1).

  27. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8:16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(2):512–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jia LF, Wei SB, Gong K, Gan YH, Yu GY. Prognostic implications of micoRNA miR-195 expression in human tongue squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e56634.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Supic G, Zeljic K, Rankov AD, Kozomara R, Nikolic A, Radojkovic D, Magic Z. miR-183 and miR-21 expression as biomarkers of progression and survival in tongue carcinoma patients. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(1):401–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zheng G, Li N, Jia X, Peng C, Luo L, Deng Y, Yin J, Song Y, Liu H, Lu M, et al. MYCN-mediated miR-21 overexpression enhances chemo-resistance via targeting CADM1 in tongue cancer. J Mol Med (Berl). 2016;94(10):1129–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jia LF, Wei SB, Gan YH, Guo Y, Gong K, Mitchelson K, Cheng J, Yu GY. Expression, regulation and roles of miR-26a and MEG3 in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2014;135(10):2282–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Li J, Huang H, Sun L, Yang M, Pan C, Chen W, Wu D, Lin Z, Zeng C, Yao Y, et al. MiR-21 indicates poor prognosis in tongue squamous cell carcinomas as an apoptosis inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(12):3998–4008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Maruyama T, Nishihara K, Umikawa M, Arasaki A, Nakasone T, Nimura F, Matayoshi A, Takei K, Nakachi S, Kariya KI, et al. MicroRNA-196a-5p is a potential prognostic marker of delayed lymph node metastasis in early-stage tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(2):2349–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Xie N, Wang C, Zhuang Z, Hou J, Liu X, Wu Y, Liu H, Huang H. Decreased miR-320a promotes invasion and metastasis of tumor budding cells in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(40):65744–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Berania I, Cardin GB, Clément I, Guertin L, Ayad T, Bissada E, Nguyen-Tan PF, Filion E, Guilmette J, Gologan O, et al. Four PTEN-targeting co-expressed miRNAs and ACTN4- targeting miR-548b are independent prognostic biomarkers in human squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(11):2318–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jia L, Huang Y, Zheng Y, Lyu M, Zhang C, Meng Z, Gan Y, Yu G. miR-375 inhibits cell growth and correlates with clinical outcomes in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2015;33(4):2061–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen W, Wang P, Lu Y, Jin T, Lei X, Liu M, Zhuang P, Liao J, Lin Z, Li B, et al. Decreased expression of mitochondrial miR-5787 contributes to chemoresistance by reprogramming glucose metabolism and inhibiting MT-CO3 translation. Theranostics. 2019;9(20):5739–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen S, Zhang J, Sun L, Li X, Bai J, Zhang H, Li T. miR-611 promotes the proliferation, migration and invasion of tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells by targeting FOXN3. Oral Dis. 2019;25(8):1906–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kawakita A, Yanamoto S, Yamada S, Naruse T, Takahashi H, Kawasaki G, Umeda M. MicroRNA-21 promotes oral cancer invasion via the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by targeting DKK2. Pathol Oncol Res. 2014;20(2):253–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Al Rawi N, Elmabrouk N, Abu Kou R, Mkadmi S, Rizvi Z, Hamdoon Z. The role of differentially expressed salivary microRNA in oral squamous cell carcinoma. A systematic review. Arch Oral Biol. 2021;125:105108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dioguardi M, Caloro GA, Laino L, Alovisi M, Sovereto D, Crincoli V, Aiuto R, Coccia E, Troiano G, Lo Muzio L. Circulating miR-21 as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of oral Cancer: a systematic review with Meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2020, 12(4).

  44. Jamali Z, Asl Aminabadi N, Attaran R, Pournagiazar F, Ghertasi Oskouei S, Ahmadpour F. MicroRNAs as prognostic molecular signatures in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2015;51(4):321–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Troiano G, Mastrangelo F, Caponio VCA, Laino L, Cirillo N, Lo Muzio L. Predictive prognostic value of tissue-based MicroRNA expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2018;97(7):759–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. He Q, Chen Z, Cabay RJ, Zhang L, Luan X, Chen D, Yu T, Wang A, Zhou X. microRNA-21 and microRNA-375 from oral cytology as biomarkers for oral tongue cancer detection. Oral Oncol. 2016;57:15–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Moratin J, Hartmann S, Brands R, Brisam M, Mutzbauer G, Scholz C, Seher A, Müller-Richter U, Kübler AC, Linz C. Evaluation of miRNA-expression and clinical tumour parameters in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(7):876–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yu X, Li Z. MicroRNA expression and its implications for diagnosis and therapy of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. J Cell Mol Med. 2016;20(1):10–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sano D, Myers JN. Metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007;26(3–4):645–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Silverman S Jr. Demographics and occurrence of oral and pharyngeal cancers. The outcomes, the trends, the challenge. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132(Suppl):s7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82201110) and Yantai School-City. Integration Development Project (2023XDRHXMPT11). The authors are grateful to Prof. Chunlei Han for the advice on data analysis, Dr. Zhengrui Li for thesis writing instructions and AJE institution for language editing support.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82201110) and Yantai School-City; Integration Development Project (2023XDRHXMPT11).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yiwei Sun and Yuxiao Li contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Stomatology, Binzhou Medical University, No. 346 The Guanhai Road Yantai, Yantai, Shandong Province, 264003, China

    Yiwei Sun

  2. The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Binzhou Medical University, No. 346 The Guanhai Road Yantai, Yantai, Shandong Province, 264003, China

    Yuxiao Li

  3. The affiliated Yantai Stomatological Hospital, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, 264000, China

    Wenjuan Zhou & Zhonghao Liu

  4. Yantai Engineering Research Center for Digital Technology of Stomatology, Yantai, 264000, China

    Wenjuan Zhou & Zhonghao Liu

  5. Characteristic Laboratories of Colleges and Universities in Shandong Province for Digital Stomatology, Yantai, 264003, China

    Wenjuan Zhou & Zhonghao Liu

Authors
  1. Yiwei Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuxiao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wenjuan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhonghao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Yuxiao Li and Yiwei Sun designed the study and completed the registration. Yuxiao Li conducted data extraction and performed the statistical analysis. Yuxiao Li and Yiwei Sun evaluated the risk of bias assessment and validated the result. Yuxiao Li and Yiwei Sun wrote the manuscript. Wenjuan Zhou and Zhonghao Liu supervised and offered support in language editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenjuan Zhou or Zhonghao Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Li, Y., Zhou, W. et al. MicroRNA expression as a prognostic biomarker of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC): a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 24, 406 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04182-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04182-0

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us