Skip to main content
Download PDF

Immediate and Delayed Post Space Preparations in Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Scoping Review

BMC Oral Health volume 22, Article number: 625 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present review was to identify the effect of the post-space preparation (PSP) timing (immediate or delayed) on endodontically treated teeth.

Methods

All studies in any language that compared the effect of immediate versus delayed PSP on the outcomes of an endodontically treated tooth were searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, ProQuest, WorldCat, and Google Scholar databases by two independent researchers until February 12, 2022. Studies assessing merely the immediate or delayed PSP were excluded. A descriptive analysis was performed to evaluate the study design and the characteristics of the included studies.

Results

The initial search yielded 2612 records, of which 68 were included. Except for one randomized controlled trial, all were in vitro. The evaluated variables were apical/coronal microleakage (n = 48/n = 1), post-bond strength (n = 8), bacterial infiltration (n = 7), presence of voids (n = 3), apical extrusion and residual of filling material (n = 1), and post-operative pain (n = 1). The number of publications had steady growth per year and fast growth per decade. "Post-space preparation" was the most popular keywords.

Conclusions

The present review highlights the need for further investigations due to the various design of studies, controversial results, and an inadequate number of randomized controlled trials.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered. Open Science (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2YTM6).

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Endodontically treated teeth have undergone extensive loss of coronal structure and lack an adequate support for a permanent restoration. In these cases, additional retention from the root canal may be required [1]. Thus, these teeth may need core retention through intracanal post placement [2, 3]. Despite a paradigm shift in dentistry in the last decades regarding replacing the conventional mechanically retained restorations with modern methods which depend on adhesion, these conventional methods of restoring teeth, have been supported by long-term studies as treatment options for restoring endodontically treated teeth because of their good reliability and predictability [4]. Post-space may be prepared by hot pluggers instantly after pulp space obturation or by rotary instruments after sealer setting, categorized as immediate or delayed, respectively [5,6,7].

During the post space preparation (PSP), the root canal filling material may be twisted, vibrated, or dislocated, consequently creating voids [8]. Several factors, including apical integrity, the remaining amount of root canal filling materials, the obturation techniques, the gutta-percha removal techniques, sealer type, and preparation time, may affect the integrity of root canal filling materials and cause microleakage and bacterial infiltration [2, 5, 6]. Thus, it is essential not to deteriorate the integrity of the residual filling material to provide an appropriate apical sealing and to avoid re-infection or re-colonization of bacteria [5, 6].

It is recommended that the same clinician who has performed the endodontic treatment perform PSP with a rubber dam to avoid contamination [9]. The immediate PSP allows the prepared root canal to receive the post in a unique session and to, assess the condensation of the remaining gutta-percha, and if necessary, some modifications can be considered. However there are disagreements regarding the time interval between the root canal filling and the PSP [7]. The time of PSP may influence some outcomes in endodontically treated teeth such as void formation [10], displacement of filling material [9], the bond strength of the post [5], and post-operative pain [11]. Nevertheless, there are no consensus on the post-operative pain induced by post-endodontic restorations after single- or two-visit root canal treatments [11].

Owing to controversial reports regarding the effect of the interval between root canal treatment and PSP on the outcome of the endodontically treated tooth, it is necessary to identify the existing reports and evaluate the quality of evidence by performing a comprehensive review. Therefore, based on the heterogeneous set of data, this scoping review was conducted to map the research done in this area and to evaluate the outcomes related to immediate or delayed PSP in endodontically treated teeth.

Materials and Methods

Protocol and scope of review

The protocol of this study was based on the framework proposed by Peters et al. [12] according to the Joana Briggs Institute. It is available at https://osf.io/yc9nb/. In addition, this scoping review was reported based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist (Online Resource 1, Table S1). This review focused on the following evidence-based practice: What is the best time for PSP after endodontic treatment?

Eligibility criteria

Studies that considered the effect of PSP time on endodontically treated teeth were selected. This included experimental studies (in vivo or in vitro), case reports, case series, clinical studies, or systematic reviews that compared the effects of immediate and delayed PSP on endodontically treated teeth. Literature reviews, book sections, congress papers, commentaries, methodological approaches, opinion or hypothesis articles, and editorial letters were excluded.

Information source and search strategy

An electronic search without date or language restriction was conducted on Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases from their date of inception to February 12, 2022, using the keywords ((((post OR dowel OR fiber post OR intracanal post OR intraradicular post) AND (space AND prepar*)) AND (time OR timing OR immediate* OR early OR late OR delay*))), where asterisk symbol was used for truncation. Grey literature was also searched through ProQuest, WorldCat, and Google Scholar (first 100 hits). Furthermore, the reference lists of included studies, reviews, and textbooks were searched through manual search (Online Resource 1, Table S2).

Screening

After excluding the duplicated records, the titles and abstracts of the retrieved studies were independently screened by two authors (S.M and P.I). Then the full texts of studies were read and evaluated for the eligibility criteria independently. In all stages, any disagreements were resolved through discussion with the third author (M.Z.J).

Data extraction

The data of records that met the eligibility criteria were extracted by two reviewers independently(S.M and P.I). A standard form was designed using Excel software (Office, Microsoft, EUA). The studies were categorized into the experimental and randomized controlled trial (RCT) categories according to their design. The data extracted from the included studies were first authors’ last names, year of publication, sample size, time of preparation, and main outcome. Any disagreement was resolved through discussion with other reviewers(M.Z.J). If data were missing, the co-author was contacted via email.

Bibliometric analyses

The trend line of published articles per year and decade was calculated. The bibliometric data of included articles were retrieved from Scopus and imported as a CSV file to VOS viewer 1.6.15 software (http://www.vosviewer.com/, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands) to identify the frequency of journal, country of origin, organization, and authorship involved in publishing the PSP. The hot topics were illustrated using density visualization of author keywords co-occurrence.

Qualitative analysis

Data were presented on tabular and bar charts based on the number of articles accordant with immediate or delayed PSP or were unclear.

Results

Description of the included records

The initial search yielded 412records from PubMed,911 from Scopus, 588 from Web of Science, 210 from Cochrane library, 385 from ProQuest, 72 from WorldCat, 100 from Google Scholar and 144 from hand search. After the removal of duplicated records (1035), 1713 records were excluded in the initial screening of titles and abstracts. At full-text evaluation stage, 6 records were excluded [13,14,15,16,17,18]. The reasons for exclusion are described in the Online Resource 1, Table S3. Finally, 68 records published between 1981 and 2022 were included (Figure 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow chart

Full size image

Characteristics of Records

Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 summarize the main data. According to the study design, one record was RCT, and the rest were experimental studies (67 records). Two studies were performed on bovine teeth, while others were conducted on human teeth.

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies evaluating apical leakage
Full size table
Table 2 Characteristics of the included studies evaluating coronal microleakage
Full size table
Table 3 Characteristics of the included studies evaluating bacterial infiltration
Full size table
Table 4 Characteristics of the included studies evaluating voids
Full size table
Table 5 Characteristics of the included studies evaluating bond strength of the posts
Full size table
Table 6 Characteristics of the included studies evaluating apical displacement and residual filling material
Full size table
Table 7 The clinical trial study evaluating post operative pain after PSP
Full size table

In Vitro Studies

For the in vitro category, 67 studies were included (Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6). Regarding the timing of PSP, the immediate preparation times were 8 min and 22 min [19], 30 min [9], 40 min [8] in one study each, and 24 hours in four studies [1, 20,21,22]. The exact time of immediate PSP was not reported in other included studies [2, 6, 7, 10, 23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61]. There was a great range regarding the exact time of delayed PSP. For the delayed preparation group, the included studies considered a wide range from4 months [62] to 48 h or 72 h [20, 23, 28, 29, 35, 37, 57, 60, 62]. One study evaluated the effect of four delayed preparation times, including 8 h, 24 h, 72 h, and 7 days [23].

In experimental studies, the effects of timing of PSP on 6 variables, including graphical microleakage (n=48), coronal microleakage (n=1), bacterial infiltration (n=7), presence of void (n=3), bond strength (n=8), and apical displacement and residual root canal filling (n=1), were evaluated (Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 and Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The summery of superiority of delay vs immediately post space preparation according the included studies

Full size image

Apical Microleakage

Apical microleakage was assessed in 48 in vitro studies [1, 2, 6,7,8, 20, 22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61, 63, 64] using different methods such as autoradiographic investigation [53, 54, 59], linear dye penetration [1, 6, 20, 22, 23, 25, 26, 28,29,30,31,32,33, 35, 37, 39,40,41,42, 44, 46, 48,49,50,51,52, 56,57,58, 61, 63, 64], glucose microleakage model [27], fluid transport device [2, 24, 36, 47, 55], volumetric analysis [60], computerized fluid filtration method [34, 38, 43], electrical curren t[8], pressure-driven system [45], and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [7]. Different outcomes were reported in this regard. While most studies showed the benefit of immediate PSP [6, 7, 22, 23, 25, 27, 31, 35, 36, 38,39,40,41,42, 44, 48,49,50, 52, 55, 59, 64], others showed no superiority of either timing [1, 8, 20, 24, 26, 28,29,30, 32, 33, 43, 45, 46, 51, 53, 57, 58, 60, 61, 63], and a few showed lower apical microleakage after delayed PSP [2, 37, 54]. In three studies based on the type of sealers used, different results were achieved, which will be discussed further [34, 47, 56].

Coronal Microleakage

A study examined coronal microleakage using different filling materials [65] and showed the length of coronal microleakage depended on the sealer and timing of the PSP. When mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) paste was used as a filling material, the timing of PSP did not affect coronal microleakage. However, when AH plus paste was used, immediate PSP resulted in lower coronal microleakage (Table 2).

Bacterial Infiltration

Seven invitro studies evaluated bacterial infiltration [19, 66,67,68,69,70,71], three used Enterococcus faecalis [19, 69, 70], two used Staphylococcus species [66, 67], and one used Streptococcus mutans as the bacterial marker [71] for the preparation of the infected specimens. The microbial microleakage model in three studies consisted of the dual chamber test [70, 71] or a slight modification of it [19], and four studies used the bacterial microleakage system, which provides qualitative rather than quantitative results [66,67,68,69]. All the studies considered extracted human single-rooted teeth. Overall, they found no significant difference in the bacterial microleakage between immediate and delayed PSP groups, except two studies [19, 66], which reported lower bacterial infiltration was reported in the immediate PSP group.

Presence of Voids

Three studies evaluated the presence of voids; one with SEM [72] and the two other with micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging [5, 10]. The micro-CT imaging showed no significant differences between the immediate or delayed PSP [5] based on the measurement of the volume of voids. However, another micro-CT imaging analysis reported the lowest mean value of voids in the immediate PSP group [10], the same results as those of another SEM analysis [72].

Bond Strength

Considering the bond strength, all eight studies analyzed adhesive resistance by the push-out test of the post after cementation. They sectioned the specimens perpendicularly to the long axis of the root, and a cylindrical plunger was applied in the apical-coronal direction loading until the filling material or the post was dislodged from the slice. Teeth that were used were human single-rooted teeth in 6 studies [21, 62, 73,74,75,76], human premolar teeth with double root canals in one study [5], and bovine teeth in one study [77]. Various techniques and materials were used for post cementation. Experimental procedures were done on fiber posts in all studies, whereas stainless-steel posts were used in two studies [62, 76]. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) [5, 21], NaOCl and EDTA 17% [76], and distilled water [73, 78] were among the solutions used for post space irrigation. Moreover, in a study by Vano et al. [75], an additional SEM analysis was done to assess the cleanliness of the post-space qualitatively. In general, the outcomes of the studies were heterogeneous. Three studies indicated no significant differences [5, 62, 76], while three [74, 75, 77] and two studies [21, 73] reported higher bond strength in the delayed and immediate preparation groups, respectively.

Apical displacement and residual root canal filling

A study analyzed apical displacement and residual root canal filling [9]. Bovine teeth were scanned by micro-CT before and after PSP. No significant difference was reported for the displacement of the filling material in the apical direction (extrusion). However, regarding residual root filling, immediate PSP, either with thermo or drill methods, resulted in lower residues in the root canal. In general, PSP with a drill resulted in more homogeneous root canal preparation, mainly when performed immediately.

Clinical studies

An electronic pain rating scale program with a vertical visual analog scale (VAS) was used after the first visit for both groups to evaluate post-operative pain by an RCT (Table 7) [11]. Results presented no post-operative pain in patients with delayed post cementation, in contrast, there was significantly higher post-operative pain in immediate post installation on days 1, 2 and 3 and 1 week after the first visit.

Bibliometric Analysis

Linear trend line analysis showed that the number of publications on PSP in endodontology had a steady growth per year but had a fast growth per decade (Fig. 3). Totally, 44 journals contributed to publishing articles on PSP, of which “Journal of Endodontics” with 11 published articles, acquired the top rank (Online Resource 1, Figure S1). Among19 countries that contributed to the research and publications in the field of immediate and delayed PSP, India had the highest number of publications (n = 11), followed by the USA, China, and Iran (n = 8 for each) (Online Resource 1, Figure S2). Furthermore, the U.S.A. with, 5 links had the highest international collaboration (Online Resource 1, Figure S3). At the author level, 175 authors within 37 clusters from 88 organizations contributed to the publishing of articles on PSP (Online Resource 1, Figure S4). Density visualization indicated that “post-space preparation”, “fiber post", and “AH plus” were the most popular keywords used by authors (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The trend of published studies regarding immediate and delayed PSP comparison over the past 40 years per year (blue line) and decade (red line)

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Author hot topics among 67 included articles using density visualization. Red–yellow–green–blue color scheme was used; red corresponds to the highest and blue corresponds to the lowest density of keyword co-occurrence. The distance-based approach was used; smaller the distance between two item means the higher relatedness

Full size image

Discussion

This scoping review provides information about the publishing metrics of PSP. Articles with a steady growth evaluated the influence of different time intervals of PSP on various aspects of an endodontically treated tooth over four decades. It should be noted that there was no well-designed randomized controlled trial on this subject. Furthermore, the present scoping review categorized the effect of the timing of PSP on the apical sealing of the remaining root canal filling material, bacterial infiltration, presence of voids, post-bond strength, apical extrusion, residual filling material, and post-operative pain in endodontically treated teeth. Overall immediate PSP would be the safest clinical choice regarding most of these parameters. Other than post-operative pain, there were lower apical microleakage and lower residues into the root canal after immediate PSP, and no difference was found regarding bacterial microleakage and displacement of filling materials. However, further studies are required to explore some parameters such as the presence of voids and post-bond strength.

The data regarding apical microleakage were very heterogeneous, and most of the in vitro studies indicated lower penetration of dyes or fluids into the immediate PSP some suggesting no difference in bacterial infiltration. However, a recent meta-analysis with strict eligibility criteria, which included 3 studies, reported higher apical microleakage in one week delayed PSP [79]. Moreover, a systematic review reported all techniques used for evaluating apical microleakage were helpful if the study had a large sample size and a proper control group [80]. In addition to these factors, variations in sealer type and root filling materials, PSP methods, and the amount of the remaining root filling material may be other reasons for this difference [2, 47, 79]. Regarding the different properties of the sealers, a lower apical microleakage was shown in the immediate PSP using the AH plus compared with delayed PSP and zinc oxide-eugenol-based seale r[6, 20, 48, 53, 55, 56]. For AH plus, higher adhesion to dentin and expansion capacity may significantly reduce the apical microleakage [5, 45, 55]. Different PSP methods and the amount of remaining root filling materials may affect the outcome of apical microleakage. For instance, a heated endodontic plugger for immediate PSP may remove the gutta-percha without disturbing the apical seal and eliminate the possibility of inadvertent damage to dentin [81]. In any case, PSP should allow a minimum length of 3-5 mm gutta-percha in the apical third to preserve the seal [81]. In two studies comparing the effect of the length of the remaining apical filling material on apical microleakage, the more was the remaining apical filling material, the lower was the apical microleakage [22, 27]. In conclusion, many factors may affect the outcome of apical microleakage, so more studies are required to be conducted in this regard.

Among three studies that evaluated the presence of void and adaptation of filling materials, Dhaded et al. [72] and Kataia et al. [10] reported better adaptation in the immediate PSP group. On the other hand, no difference was reported by Long et al. [5] which might be due to different obturation techniques and sealers. For instance, the single-cone technique provides void-free obturation and improves the apical sealing along with a minimal sealer thickness [2]. The delayed PSP may cause the fracture of the bonding of the sealer (AH Plus, Resilon / Epiphany) to dentin when the sealer is set [10]. Still, considering the excellent properties of calcium silicate-based sealers, the bonding integrity is maintained [4]. In general, due to limited studies, more studies are suggested to be performed in this regard.

Bond strength was evaluated by the push-out test in the included studies [5, 21, 62, 73,74,75,76, 78] with controversial results regarding the timing of PSP. The adhesive system, surface treatment, and cement curing methods that guaranteed efficient adhesion of the post to the root dentin [82] were different and might be the reason for controversy. Post-space surface treatment such as the use of ethanol or sodium hypochlorite removes the smear layer efficiently and increases the infiltration depth of the adhesive and types of cement into the dentinal tubules [83, 84]. Regarding the effect of the cement curing methods on bond strength, dual or chemically activated adhesive resin cements are the most appropriate for the cementation of fiberglass posts since, with a longer working time, they allow better control of the post adaptation [82]. The use of photoactivated cement, because of limited light transmission to the apical third, results in a low degree of conversion of resin monomers, thereby compromising the integrity of the adhesive interface [82]. Future studies are required to investigate the influence of these factors and an appropriate time of PSP that guarantee effective bond strength.

Apical displacement and residual root filling after PSP were analyzed through micro-CT analysis in one study [9]. The micro-CT provides high-resolution images and allows for quantitative analyses. While no difference was reported regarding apical displacement of the filling material, a lower percentage of residual filling material was reported for immediate PSP, which is probably related to the technical difficulty of root filling material removal over time.

A randomized controlled trial evaluated the post-operative pain of PSP and showed the vibrations generated during post-installation by a low-speed handpiece with dedicated fiber post drills from the post kit in the same visit of root canal filling might increase the post-operative pain. Therefore, the cumulative effect of root canal treatment and post installation in the first visit might increase the intensity of pain [11]. Although delayed PSP was recommended, more studies are necessary to thoroughly investigate the effects of the timing of PSP on post-operative pain.

Strength and limitation

This review was compatible with the framework of the PRISMA-ScR Checklist in identifying the research question and relevant studies, charting the data and handling, and summarizing and reporting the result s[85]. A comprehensive search with no language restrictions was conducted. The screening of records and data extraction were done by two independent reviewers. All variables regarding the impact of PSP time in endodontically treated teeth were considered, which were compatible with bibliometric analysis.

Implications for further research

Considering controversial outcomes on apical microleakage and scarcity of studies on other variables, further investigations, particularly clinical studies, are suggested. Several materials and techniques were applied, which might have affected the outcomes, indicating a lack of a standard reporting checklist and standard control group.

Conclusion

The number of studies on the comparison of immediate and delayed PSP increased over time; however, almost all studies were experimental. The studied variables included apical microleakage, coronal microleakage, bacterial infiltration, bond strength of posts, presence of voids, apical displacement of the filling material, adhesion of the remaining filling material, and post-operative pain. Most of the evidence indicated lower apical microleakage and lower residues into the root canal after immediate PSP, lower post-operative pain in delayed PSP, and no difference regarding bacterial microleakage and displacement of filling materials. Considering coronal microleakage, presence of voids, and bond strength, outcomes of the evidence were heterogeneous, indicating that future studies are needed to explore this issue. However, it remains unclear whether factors such as gutta-percha removal methods, obturation techniques, sealer properties, type of cement and adhesive, length of the remaining filling material, and irrigation protocol are effective or not, which requires further investigations.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PSP:

post space preparation

RCT:

randomized controlled trial

SEM:

scanning electron microscopy

MTA:

mineral trioxide aggregate

micro-CT:

micro computed tomography

References

  1. Raslan D, Almarrawi K. In vitro comparative study of the influence of post space preparation timing on apical sealing of root canal. Int J Appl Dental Sci. 2020;6(2):588–92.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nagas E, Karaduman E, Sahin C, Uyanik O, Canay S. Effect of timing of post space preparation on the apical seal when using different sealers and obturation techniques. J Dental Sci. 2016;11(1):79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Metgud SS, Shah HH, Hiremath HT, Agarwal D, Reddy K. Effect of post space preparation on the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Gutta-percha: A bacterial leakage study. J Conserv Dentistry. 2015;18(4):297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abu-Awwad M. A modern guide in the management of endodontically treated posterior teeth. Eur J Gen Dentistry. 2019;8(03):63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Long W, Li J, Liu Y, Jiang H. Effect of obturation technique with immediate and delayed post space preparation on apical voids and bond strength of apical gutta-percha. J Int Med Res. 2019;47(1):470–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Padmanabhan P, Das J, Kumari RV, Pradeep P, Kumar A, Agarwal S. Comparative evaluation of apical microleakage in immediate and delayed postspace preparation using four different root canal sealers: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dentistry. 2017;20(2):86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhaded N, Uppin VM, Dhaded S, Patil C. Evaluation of immediate and delayed post space preparation on sealing ability of Resilon–Epiphany and Gutta percha-AH plus sealer. J Conserv Dentistry. 2013;16(6):514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aydemir H, Ceylan G, Tasdemir T, Kalyoncuoglu E, Isildak I. Effect of immediate and delayed post space preparation on the apical seal of root canals obturated with different sealers and techniques. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(6):605–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosatto CMP, Oliveira LV, Ferraz DC, Soares PBF, Soares CJ, Moura CCG. Apical Displacement and Residual Root Canal Filling with Single-Cone After Post Space Preparation: A Micro-CT Analysis. Braz Dent J. 2020;31:25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kataia EM, Kataia MM. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the apical seal of endodontically treated teeth by two obturating techniques and two post space preparation techniques. J Int Oral Health. 2020;12(1):41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eyuboglu TF, Kim HC. When to install the endodontic post? First visit with root canal filling versus a separate second visit for post-restoration: A randomized controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2020;47(10):1247–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implement. 2015;13(3):141–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sawsan TAZ, El Sayed M. The effect of immediate post-space preparation on the apical seal of endodontically treated teeth obturated with various root canal sealers; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Nys M, Martens L, De Coster W, Thys M. Evaluation of dowel space preparation on the apical seal using an image processing system. Int Endod J. 1989;22(5):240–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Shimmary AH, Al-Huwaizi HF. Comparison of apical seal of four obturation techniques after delayed post space preparation. J Baghdad Coll Dentistry. 2012;24(special issue 2):1-4.

  16. Roitman ML, Pinasco LB, Loiacono R, Panetta VC, Anaise CA, Rodríguez PA. Efficacy of different instruments for the mechanical removal of the smear layer in immediate post preparations: a comparative study. Acta odontologica latinoamericana. 2021;34(2):166–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gerogianni P, Chrepa V, Haney S. Cat of the month. Critically Appraised Topics. Time of Post Space Preparation Affects the Amount of Coronal Microleakage in Endodontically Treated Teeth When a Resin Sealer Is Used (UT CAT #2773). Texas Dental J. 2015;132(5):302.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibrahim RM, Seef RE, Seniour SH. The effect of immediate and delayed post space preparation and post length on the apical seal. Egypt Dent J. 1995;41(4):1457–62.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Alvarez SS. Effect of immediate and delayed post space preparation on coronal bacterial microleakage in teeth obturated with a methacrylate-based sealer with and without accelerator. Am J Dent. 2010;23(2):116–20.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Corrêa Pesce AL, González López S, González Rodríguez MP. Effect of post space preparation on apical seal: influence of time interval and sealer. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal (Internet). 2007;12(6):464–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aleisa K, Al-Dwairi ZN, Alsubait SA, Morgano SM. Pull-out retentive strength of fiber posts cemented at different times in canals obturated with a eugenol-based sealer. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(1):85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Ashou WMO, Al-Shamaa RM, Hassan SS. Sealing Ability of Various Types of Root Canal Sealers at Different Levels of Remaining Gutta Percha After Post Space Preparation at Two Time Intervals. J Int Soc Prev Commun Dentistry. 2021;11(6):721–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kim H-R, Kim YK, Kwon T-Y. Post space preparation timing of root canals sealed with AH Plus sealer. Restorative Dentistry Endodontics. 2017;42(1):27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanompetsanga P, Pakit T. Microleakage in Immediate vs Delayed Post Space Preparation in Root Canals Filled with Bioceramic-based Root Canal Sealer. World J Dent. 2020;11(3):172–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dixit T, Vanapatla A, Tulasi Priya N, Neethu Nanda B, Sneha P, Avinash M. Comparision of apical leakage between immediate versus delayed post space preparation using various root canal sealers–an invitro study. Turkish J Physiotherap Rehab. 2021;32(3):18701–5.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gujarathi NN, Mandlik J, Singh S, Chaubey S. Evaluation of apical leakage after immediate and delayed postspace preparation using different root canal sealers: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dentistry. 2021;24(2):174–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang J, Zheng M, Wu H, Li X, Xie W. Microleakage from the crown to the root canal after post space preparation with different timing and remaining length. Chin J Tissue Eng Res. 2019;23(10):1552–7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen G, Chang Y. The effect of immediate and delayed post-space preparation using extended working time root canal sealers on apical leakage. J Dental Sci. 2013;8(1):31–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. RT D, SQ L, FY G, HW L, YT F, XY W. An in vitro/comparative study on the effect of different timing of post space preparation on apical microleakage of fiber posts. J PrevTreat Stomatol Dis. 2016;24(9):515–8.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kala M, Torvi SJ. An in vitro comparision of apical leakage in immediate versus delayed post space preparation using EndoREZ and RoekoSeal root canal sealers. J Int Clin Dental Res Organ. 2015;7(1):30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pushpa S, Geeta, Benal Vijayalaxmi D, Bharati SH, Prashanth R, Karuna. An in-vitro comparison of apical leakage in immediate versus delayed post space preparation. Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University. 2014;4(1):19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vaz I, Carvalho MJ, Barros J, Cruz J. Influence of the timing of post space preparation on apical sealing. RGO - Rev Gaúcha Odontol. 2013;61(2):199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Sabawi NA, Ismail SA, Al-Askary RA. Effect of different techniques of immediate and delayed post space preparation on apical seal. Al-Rafidain Dental J. 2012;12(2):249–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Güngör G, Türkaydin D, Tarçin B, Öveçoğlu H, Günday M, Oruçoğlu H. Comparison of apical sealing of two canal sealers between immediate versus delayed post space preparation. Marmara. Dent J. 2013;1(1):20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Xiao Y, Yu J, Wang JP, Guo H. Effects of post space and post core preparation at different time on apical microleakage with fiber post sealing. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering. Research. 2012;16(29):5366–70.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Attam K, Talwar S. A laboratory comparison of apical leakage between immediate versus delayed post space preparation in root canals filled with Resilon. Int Endod J. 2010;43(9):775–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen G, Chang Y-C. Effect of immediate and delayed post space preparation on apical leakage using three root canal obturation techniques after rotary instrumentation. J Formos Med Assoc. 2011;110(7):454–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cobankara FK, Orucoglu H, Ozkan HB, Yildirim C. Effect of immediate and delayed post preparation on apical microleakage by using methacrylate-based EndoREZ sealer with or without accelerator. J Endod. 2008;34(12):1504–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ehsani M, Mesgarani A, Soltani-Garmabi M. Comparison of apical leakage using AH26 and Apatite root sealers with immediate and delayed post space preparation. J Iranian Dental Assoc. 2009;21(2):132–7.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Junior ED, Garcetti riBeiro G, de Castilho Jacinto R, Juvenal nerY M, JA OFH, JEG FH, et al. Marginal leakage evaluation of three endodontic sealers according to the moment of post preparation. Dental Press Endodontics. 2012;2(2):37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Paiva J, Barros J, Noites R, Carvalho MF, Pina-Vaz I. Comparação da Infiltração Apical entre a Desobturação Imediata do Canal Radicular e a Desobturação após 8 Dias para a Preparação do Espaço para o Espigão. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial. 2010;51(4):197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Salim BM. A comparison between immediate and delayed post space preparation on the apical seal prepared by hand protaper instruments. MJD. 2008;5:232–8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yildirim T, Taşdemir T, Orucoglu H. The evaluation of the influence of using MTA in teeth with post indication on the apical sealing ability. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(3):471–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen M, Feng YZ. The effects of post space preparation and post restoration on apical sealing ability. Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi =. West ChinaJ Stomatol. 2009;27(5):512–5.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Abramovitz I, Tagger M, Tamse A, Metzger Z. The effect of immediate vs. delayed post space preparation on the apical seal of a root canal filling: a study in an increased-sensitivity pressure-driven system. J Endod. 2000;26(8):435–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ashraf H, Joolaey J, S. JA. Effect of immediate and delayed post space preparation on apical dye leakage using two different sealers. Journal of Dental School Shahid Beheshti University of Med Sci 2003;20(4):558-67.

  47. Bodrumlu E, Tunga U, Alaçam T. Influence of immediate and delayed post space preparation on sealing ability of resilon. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103(6):e61–e4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Fallah Rastegar A, Ghaziani P, Zarei M. The effect of immediate and delayed preparation of post space using AH26 and Roth sealers on apical leakage. J Mashhad Dental School. 2004;28(Issue):77-82.

  49. Javidi M, Sedigh Shams M, Mesgarani A. Apical Leakage in Obturated Canals Using two Different Sealers after Immediate and Delayed Post Space Preparation. J Dent. 2007;8(2):48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sadeghi S, Kangarlou A. Comparison of sealing ability of lateral and vertical techniques in two different post space preparations. Iranian Endodontic J (IEJ). 2007;2(2):61–4.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Shahi S, Hoseini M. An in vitro study of the effect of immediate and delayed post space preparation with two different methods on apical seal. Med J Tabriz Univ Med Sci. 2007;28(4):71–5.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Solano F, Hartwell G, Appelstein C. Comparison of apical leakage between immediate versus delayed post space preparation using AH Plus sealer. J Endod. 2005;31(10):752–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bourgeois RS, Lemon RR. Dowel space preparation and apical leakage. J Endod. 1981;7(2):66–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Dickey DJ, Harris GZ, Lemon RR, Luebke RG. Effect of post space preparation on apical seal using solvent techniques and Peeso reamers. J Endod. 1982;8(8):351–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Fan B, Wu MK, Wesselink P. Coronal leakage along apical root fillings after immediate and delayed post space preparation. Dent Traumatol. 1999;15(3):124–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Karapanou V, Vera J, Cabrera P, White RR, Goldman M. Effect of immediate and delayed post preparation on apical dye leakage using two different sealers. J Endod. 1996;22(11):583–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Madison S, Zakariasen KL. Linear and volumetric analysis of apical leakage in teeth prepared for posts. J Endod. 1984;10(9):422–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Moon E-W, Lee I-S, Choi G-W. The effect of post-space preparation time on the apical seal of endodontically treated teeth. Restorative Dentistry Endodontics. 1988;13(1):151–8.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Portell FR, Bernier WE, Lorton L, Peters DD. The effect of immediate versus delayed dowel space preparation on the integrity of the apical seal. J Endod. 1982;8(4):154–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Rybicki R, Zillich R. Apical sealing ability of Thermafil following immediate and delayed post space preparations. J Endod. 1994;20(2):64–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Saunders W, Saunders E, Gutmann J, Gutmann M. An assessment of the plastic Thermafil obturation technique: Part 3 The effect of post space preparation on the apical seal. Int Endod J. 1993;26(3):184–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Dias LL, Giovani AR, Silva Sousa YT, Vansan LP, Alfredo E, Sousa-Neto MD, et al. Effect of eugenol-based endodontic sealer on the adhesion of intraradicular posts cemented after different periods. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(6):579–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Lan YY, Huang H-x, Fan L-y, Pu L, Liu M, Sun L-b. Influence of immediate or delayed post space preparation on the apical sealing ability of different root canal sealers. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering. Research. 2017;21(10):1483.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kalra PK, Mulay S, Aggarwal S. Comparison of apical leakage between immediate versus delayed post space preparation using two resin sealers. J Int Clin Dental Res Organ. 2009;1(2):57.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Lan YY, Pu L, Huang H-x, Fan L-y, Liu M, Sun L-b. Effects of immediate versus delayed post space preparation on coronal microleakage using different filling materials. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering. Research. 2016;20(25):3757.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Nikhil V, Khanna P, Gupta D. Influence of timing of post space preparation and presence/absence of intracanal barrier on coronal bacterial microleakage: An ex-vivo study. Indian J Stomatol. 2011;2(2):102.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Jalalzadeh SM, Mamavi A, Abedi H, Mashouf RY, Modaresi A, Karapanou V. Bacterial microleakage and post space timing for two endodontic sealers: an in vitro study. J Mass Dent Soc. 2010;59(2):34–7.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Sharma AK, Sharma PP, Mandhotra P, Bhutia KS, Rathee M, Sawhney K. Assessment of effect of post space preparation on the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and gutta-percha. Group. 2020;18(11.57) 90.25-14.23.

  69. Frough Reyhani M, Rahimi S, Fathi Z, Shakouie S, Salem Milani A, Soroush Barhaghi MH, et al. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effects of Different Concentrations of Triple Antibiotic Paste on Mature Biofilm of Enterococcus faecalis. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2015;9(3):138–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Grecca FS, Rosa AR, Gomes MS, Parolo CF, Bemfica JR, Frasca LC, et al. Effect of timing and method of post space preparation on sealing ability of remaining root filling material: in vitro microbiological study. J Can Dent Assoc. 2009;75(8):583.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lyons W, Hartwell G, Stewart J, Reavley B, Appelstein C, Lafkowitz S. Comparison of coronal bacterial leakage between immediate versus delayed post-space preparation in root canals filled with Resilon/Epiphany. Int Endod J. 2009;42(3):203–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Dhaded N, Dhaded S, Patil C, Patil R, Roshan JM. The Effect of Time of Post Space Preparation on the Seal and Adaptation of Resilon-Epiphany Se & Gutta-percha-AH Plus Sealer- An Sem Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(1):217–20.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Vilas-Boas DA, Grazziotin-Soares R, Ardenghi DM, Bauer J, de Souza PO, de Miranda Candeiro GT, et al. Effect of different endodontic sealers and time of cementation on push-out bond strength of fiber posts. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(3):1403–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Vano M, Cury AH, Goracci C, Chieffi N, Gabriele M, Tay FR, et al. The effect of immediate versus delayed cementation on the retention of different types of fiber post in canals obturated using a eugenol sealer. J Endod. 2006;32(9):882–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Vano M, Cury A, Goracci C, Chieffi N, Gabriele M, Tay F, et al. Retention of fiber posts cemented at different time intervals in canals obturated using an epoxy resin sealer. J Dent. 2008;36(10):801–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Boone KJ, Murchison DF, Schindler WG, Walker WA 3rd. Post retention: the effect of sequence of post-space preparation, cementation time, and different sealers. J Endod. 2001;27(12):768–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Machado MBM, Morgan LFSA, Gomes GM, Vasconcellos WA, Cardoso FP, de Castro AR. Effects of immediate and delayed intraradicular preparation on bond strength of fiber posts. Indian J Dent Res. 2015;26(3):244.

  78. Machado MB, Alves Morgan LF, Gomes GM, Vasconcellos WA, Cardoso FP, Albuquerque RC. Effects of immediate and delayed intraradicular preparation on bond strength of fiber posts. Indian J Dental Res. 2015;26(3):244–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. dos Reis-Prado AH, Abreu LG, Tavares WLF, da Cunha Peixoto IF, Viana ACD, de Oliveira EMC, et al. Comparison between immediate and delayed post space preparations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;1-24.

  80. Jafari F, Jafari S. Importance and methodologies of endodontic microleakage studies: A systematic review. J Clin Experiment Dentistry. 2017;9(6):e812.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Dangra Z, Gandhewar M. All about Dowels-A review part I. Considerations before Cementation. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017;11(8):ZG06.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Özcan M, Volpato CAM. Current Perspectives on Dental Adhesion (3): Adhesion to Intraradicular Dentin: Concepts and Applications. Jap Dental Sci Rev. 2020.

  83. Bohrer T, Fontana P, Rocha R, Kaizer O. Post-Space Treatment Influences the Bond Strength In Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies. Oper Dent. 2021;46(3):E132–E57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Kosan E, Prates-Soares A, Blunck U, Neumann K, Bitter K. Root canal pre-treatment and adhesive system affect bond strength durability of fiber posts ex vivo. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(11):6419–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

    Sadaf Mahmoudi

  2. Dental Research Center and Department of Endodontics, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

    Pedram Iranmanesh

  3. Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Saber Khazaei

  4. Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

    Maryam Zare Jahromi

Authors
  1. Sadaf Mahmoudi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pedram Iranmanesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saber Khazaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maryam Zare Jahromi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.Z.J.& S.Kh.; Study design– P.I. & S.M.; Literature search, study selection and data collection – P.I., S.M & S.Kh.; Bibliometric analyses– P.I.; Interpretation of data for the work–S.Kh & M.Z.J.; Manuscript drafting – P.I. & S.M.; Manuscript revision –M.Z.J. &S.Kh.; All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryam Zare Jahromi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

 Online Resource.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahmoudi, S., Iranmanesh, P., Khazaei, S. et al. Immediate and Delayed Post Space Preparations in Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Scoping Review. BMC Oral Health 22, 625 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02564-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02564-w

Keywords

  • Post-space preparation
  • Immediate
  • Delayed
  • Leakage

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us