Skip to main content
Download PDF

Is there a sexual difference in the relationship between sociodemographic information and the unmet dental care needs of disabled adults? An analysis from a national survey on persons with disabilities

BMC Oral Health volume 23, Article number: 830 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Health status and health care utilization in people with disabilities are more likely to be poorer than those without disabilities. Previous studies showed that there were gaps in health-related conditions by sociodemographic information and gender but the association between these factors was not explained. This study aims to analyze the relationship between sociodemographic information and the unmet dental care needs of people with disabilities and explore the effect of sex within this relationship.

Methods

The 2014 national survey on persons with disabilities was used, which separated unmet healthcare needs into medical and dental services. Unweighted samples included 6,824 people with disabilities in total and 6,555 (96.1% of the total, weighted as 6,583) people aged 20 years or older were selected as the study population. Frequency and chi-square tests were conducted to determine differences in the prevalence of unmet dental needs based on socioeconomic information, chronic diseases, and behavioral factors after applying weights. Logistic regressions were performed using an adjusted model with sociodemographic information, chronic diseases, and behavioral variables. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA).

Results

Analysis of the sociodemographic factors related to unmet dental care revealed that they were higher in women and the elderly. In the fully adjusted logistic model, most of the sociodemographic information was significantly associated with unmet dental needs. The lowest group was 4.18 times more likely to have unmet dental care needs than the richest group, and females and middle-school graduates were almost twice as likely to experience unmet dental care needs than males and university graduates. Considering the interaction effect of age on unmet dental needs depending on sex differences, the odds ratio decreased for females with every annual increase in both models. Compared with the younger group, the older group showed a lower risk of having unmet dental needs, especially in females.

Conclusions

The factor most closely related to the unmet dental care needs of disabled people was socioeconomic problems. Its influence also differed by sex and age. Therefore, economic support measures and sexual differences are needed for long-term policy consideration to reduce the unmet dental care needs of disabled people.

Peer Review reports

Background

Approximately 1.3 billion people have disabilities, 16% of the world’s population in 2021, which has increased by 300 million in the last decade [1]. The prevalence of disabilities increases with age, such that 34.4% were those over sixty years. Moreover, women showed a slightly higher proportion than men (18.0% versus 14.2%, respectively). Disabilities have diverse impacts on people not only their health, but also for example low educational opportunities, low income, and high unemployment [2, 3]. This resulted in health inequality through direct and indirect effects [4]. People with disabilities are more likely to be poorer in health status, health-risk behaviors, preventive healthcare utilization, and chronic health conditions than those without disabilities [5].

Oral diseases in disabled people rapidly progress to serious conditions [1, 2, 6,7,8,9], such as a higher Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT) index or tooth loss [10]. Oral health affects basic functions, such as chewing, swallowing, pronunciation, and breathing [11, 12], and the quality of life through its close relationship with systemic health and psychosocial interactions [13, 14]. The oral health status of the world’s population has improved [15]; however, inequality still exists [16,17,18,19]. The group with lower socioeconomic status (SES) showed higher levels of prevalence in oral disease, such as untreated dental caries, periodontal disease, or oral cancer. Although this might be common in most countries, it must be considered an “unfair, unjust, and unacceptable” situation; thus, appropriate measures must be taken to improve this [20].

Vulnerable people are often exposed to poor environments, have poor self-care skills, or face difficulties in accessing dental care [21, 22]. The higher barriers in physical or traveling, communication, and financial support [23, 24] or low prioritization of dental services [25], the worse access to healthcare. As a result, they are less likely to receive preventive treatments, such as oral examinations [26], and more likely to need dental care, such as prosthetic treatment [27].

Unmet need is defined as “difficulties receiving service in response to a problem that significantly interferes with daily life” [28, 29]. Disability was suggested as the most important factor of unmet need for medical care [30]. Moreover, disabilities interact with healthcare access, which is influenced by personal and environmental factors [31]. A study from Greece showed that unmet needs for dental care were 1.8 times higher in disabled people than those who were not, and approximately 25% of disabled people did not receive dental care for economic reasons [32]. Socioeconomic factors, such as income level, were identified as one of the important reasons for this gap [33,34,35]. Furthermore, there was a gender gap within the disabled group, women had a higher rate of unmet need for medical care than men [36]. Women with disabilities showed a 7.2 times higher rate of unmet needs for healthcare services than men without disabilities. However, there are lack of studies that consider various sociodemographic information and sex for the unmet dental care needs of persons with disabilities using a national samples survey.

This study aims to analyze the relationship between sociodemographic information and unmet dental care needs and to investigate its differences among male and female adults with disabilities in Korea.

Methods

Study design and participants

The national survey on persons with disabilities began in 1985 and has been conducted every three years since 2005. It identifies living conditions and welfare needs to develop a national policy and implementational plan. In this study, the 2014 survey data were used [37], which separated unmet healthcare needs into medical and dental services. The survey was conducted between August and October 2014. The sampling frame was 90% of the 2010 Census on Population and Housing units, and this study extracted the sampling units using the proportional stratification probability method. The number of people in each sampling unit was determined by proportional distribution according to the square roots of the registered disabled people numbers in 16 cities or provinces. The sampling household was confirmed as 48,344 within 1,004 extracted units and 251 preparatory units for cases of non-response, rejection, and redevelopment. Finally, 38,560 households completed the survey, with a response rate of 79.8%. The surveyed participants were 104,703, including disabled and non-disabled together. Among them, unweighted samples with disabilities were 6,824 people, and 6,555 (96.1% of the total, weighted as 6,583) people aged 20 years or older were selected as the study population. The final weight was calculated by multiplying the design, non-response adjustment, and post-stratification weights. The final weight for the disabled was calculated by post-adjusting the weight for the disabled by age, sex, type of disability, and 16 regions, using information for the unregistered disabled in December 2013.

The survey was conducted after obtaining the participants’ informed consent. There was a type of disability that had difficulty communicating during the survey. In this case, the responses were received through family members (mainly spouses and parents) in households. As a result, 78.5% of all disabled people responded by themselves and 21.5% were proxy responses from their family members. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Review Committee of the Korea Institute of Health and Social Affairs (KIHASA) (IRB No. KIHASA IRB-2014-14). This analytical study was approved again by the institutional review board of Kyung Hee University (IRB No. KHSIRB-22-442) and given exemption from review because the retrospective analysis included the dataset from a national survey and did not contain personally identifiable information. All methods were performed following the survey guidelines and regulations.

Statistical analysis

The questions have developed since the start of the national survey on persons with disabilities. They were supplemented and revised by the government and the professionals in this field. The outcome variable was the unmet dental care need with responses such as, “I thought I needed dental treatments for the past year, but I have not received them.” This item adapted from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which was proved validity and reliability. The independent variables were related to the unmet dental care needs and categorized into sociodemographic and health-related behavioral factors: (1) sociodemographic factors, such as sex, age, subjective economic class, health insurance type, and academic background; and (2) chronic disease and behavioral factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, smoking, frequency of toothbrushing per day, and oral examination. The patients were divided into three age groups: 20–39, 40–64, and 65 years. The persons with disabilities were defined, and the grades and types of disabilities were classified according to the Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities at the time of the investigation. Disability severity was categorized into two groups, 1st to 3rd (severe) and 4th to 6th (not severe) grade. Disabilities were classified as physical (physical, brain lesions; visual, hearing impairment; speech, kidney, heart, respiratory, liver, facial, intestinal, urinary, or epilepsy disorders) or mental (intellectual, autistic, or mental disorders). All the grades and standards of persons with disabilities were classified according to the Act of Welfare of Persons with Disabilities Act (see appendix). Health coverage was grouped into two, National Health Insurance (NHI) and Medical Aid.

Frequency and chi-square tests were conducted to determine differences in the prevalence of unmet dental needs based on socioeconomic information, chronic diseases, and behavioral factors after applying weights. Logistic regressions were performed using an adjusted model with sociodemographic variables only (Model 1) and a fully adjusted model with sociodemographic information, chronic diseases, and behavioral variables (Model 2). Variables that were not significant in the chi-square test were excluded from the logistic regression analysis. In the case of age, changes in the unmet dental care needs were not suitable when grouped; therefore, actual measurements of every age group were used in the logistic regression analysis. All figures in the table are weighted values. To determine the correlation between the variables in the model, the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) was analyzed. All values were less than 10; therefore, multicollinearity was not observed. All analyses were performed using IBM Statistical Packages for Social Science (SPSS) Statistics for Windows, version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). Statistical significance was set to α = 0.05.

Results

Among the survey population of persons with disabilities aged 20 years or older, more than half were men (57.5%) (Table 1). The middle-aged (40 to 64 years) and elderly (65 years and older) groups were slightly similar and the most common in the distribution (44.9% and 44.7%, respectively). Most of the disabilities were mild (62.8%) or physical (90.5%). Almost two-thirds of the participants had the lowest subjective SES, compared with the upper class (at least 0.9%). In terms of academic background, only 13.0% of the disabled participants graduated from university and almost four times had just finished their education in middle school (59.1%). Chronic diseases, such as hypertension or diabetes, and unhealthy behaviors, such as smoking, tooth brushing less than twice, or having no experience of oral examination in the last year, were minor in this study. Overall, one-quarter (27.5%) of the study population experienced unmet dental care needs. The distributional differences by sex in sociodemographic information were statistically significant in terms of age, educational level, health coverage, and most health-related behavioral factors except for the experience of oral examinations last year, and unmet dental care needs (p < 0.05).

Table 1 The weighted prevalence of study population of adult disabled
Full size table

Analysis of the factors related to unmet dental care revealed that they were higher in women and the elderly (Table 2). Statistically significant differences were not observed in the severity and type of disability between the two groups. Those with lower economic class, educational level, or medical coverage for the poor such as Medicaid had higher proportions of unmet dental care experience. In addition, a higher incidence of unmet dental care needs was observed in participants with chronic diseases or unhealthy behaviors.

Table 2 The weighted prevalence of unmet dental needs according to characteristics of the study population of adult disabled
Full size table

Logistic regression analysis for the factors that affect the prevalence of unmet dental care needs among adults with disabilities was presented in Table 3. All sociodemographic information including sex, age, subjective SES, educational level, and health coverage were significantly associated with unmet dental needs in Model 1. Only the middle-class group did not show a significant difference from the richest group. However, the lowest group was 4.5 times more likely to have unmet dental care needs than the richest group, and females and middle-school graduates were almost twice as likely to experience unmet dental care needs than males and university graduates. After adjusting for sociodemographic information and chronic diseases or behaviors together in Model 2, disabled adults showed similar results as Model 1. They show statistically significant differences in all included factors except the people who were in the middle SES (versus higher) or diagnosed (versus not diagnosed) with hypertension. Subjective SES and educational level showed similar odds ratios in this model. People with diabetes and unhealthy behaviors such as smoking, less frequency of toothbrushing, or no experience of oral exams had significant differences but below 1.5 odds ratio. Considering the interaction effect of age on unmet dental needs depending on sex differences, the odds ratio decreased for females with every annual increase in both models. Compared with the younger group, the older group showed a lower risk of having unmet dental needs (0.99 times having them a year), especially in females. The coefficient of determination of Nagel-Kerke’s R2 was 0.085 in Model 1 and 0.104 in Model 2, which was an increase of 0.019 from the previous model. The p-value was less than 0.01 for the test of model effects of interaction in both models between differences in sex and age.

Table 3 Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) estimated from logistic regression model for unmet dental needs of adults disabled
Full size table

Discussion

Factors related to unmet dental care experience among disabled adults were identified; men and women had large gaps in socioeconomic factors.

Subjective SES was the most significantly related factor in the unmet dental care needs of people with disabilities in Korea. 79.7% of the respondents answered that the reason for their unmet dental care needs was economic difficulty. In the case of medical care, half (58.8%) responded similarly [37]. As a representative population of the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) only 11.0% answered similarly [38]. Disabled people experienced a seven-fold higher proportion than the national sample for the reason of unmet needs as financial difficulties as previous study [39]. Economic factors had the biggest impact on unmet dental care needs [40,41,42] even for people with disabilities, a lower household income indicated a higher need for treatment but a lower utilization rate of dental services [43,44,45,46,47]. The main causes of unmet medical care were poor income, educational background, or insurance [48, 49]. To improve access to dental treatment, the barriers due to financial or systematic difficulties for vulnerable people must be eliminated priorly [50,51,52]. The extended coverage of national health insurance could be another consideration to ease the financial burden [53, 54].

Second, differences in sex were observed; women were 2.6 times more likely to have unmet dental care needs than men. This can be interpreted as such that women had difficulties accessing dental care in general. However, the probability of experiencing unmet dental care needs in women inversely increased at the interaction terms with age; 0.99 times increments in odds ratios as the 1-year-old unit increased. The proportion with women had 2.6 times higher probability than men but also tended to decrease with age of having unmet dental needs after controlling for all factors including interaction terms in the final model. This might come from the descriptive discrepancy, the proportion of men with unmet dental care needs continued to increase with age, but that of women was not similar, as the highest were middle-aged (45–64 years) and decreased after 65 years. The general difficulties of women with disabilities originate from socioeconomic vulnerabilities [55]. The educational gap between middle school (73.9%) and university (7.0%) graduates was 10.6-fold in this study, which was five times higher than that for men (43.2% and 17.4%, 2.5-fold, respectively). Women, especially those with disabilities, are more likely to be vulnerable due to a lack of educational opportunities, which makes them more likely to be exposed to financial difficulties. However, ironically, there was no statistically significant difference in subjective SES between men and women. As income tends to be evaluated per household, it can be an indicator of households rather than individuals. The low educational status of individual women with disabilities might be influential to the possibility of unmet dental care needs due to physical, economic, and social disadvantages. Unmet dental care needs must be reduced through the provision of financial support for the disabled, prior to women in the short term, and the provision of extended opportunities for education and decent jobs in the long term.

Finally, those who did not visit a dental clinic for oral examination within a year were more likely to experience unmet dental care needs. Disabled people generally showed a lower chance of having oral examinations than non-disabled people; for example, only two-thirds of that in non-disabled people [56]. Most people who did not have oral exams answered the reason as they had no symptoms or thought they were healthy, and one-fifth of them said they had moving difficulty. When they have difficulties in using dental care services including oral examinations, unmet dental care needs are likely to increase. According to a recent national survey, the number of registered persons with disabilities in Korea continues to increase, and the proportion of elderly people aged 65 years is steadily increasing [57]. Thus, the government must be made aware of the importance of oral examinations which could be the beginning of the utilization of dental care, especially for people with disabilities.

The limitations of this study are as follows. First, it was unable to compare oral health status with unmet dental care needs because this survey was questionnaire-based. Second, this study used data from the survey on persons with disabilities. The analysis has limitations on the relative comparison of the study population with the whole population for unmet dental care needs. Further studies are necessary to analyze the data including oral health status using, for example, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for all citizens. Third, the indicator for socioeconomic levels was subjective thus there may be differences from objective indicators. However subjective economic indicators are also widely used in most studies. Fourth, a survey on the status of persons with disabilities was conducted in 2020, but it was impossible to use this recent data because the 2014 survey only measured the unmet care needs of dental services. It is necessary to suggest including dental indicators in national surveys.

Conclusions

This study confirmed that the factor most closely related to the unmet dental care needs of disabled people was socioeconomic problems. Its influence also differed by sex and age. Therefore, economic support measures are needed to reduce the unmet dental care needs of disabled people and promote oral health. Long-term policy considerations are required since differences between sexes exist.

Data availability

The data that supports the findings of this study are available from the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (KIHASA), but restrictions apply to the availability of data, which was used with permission for the current study and therefore not publicly available. The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available with permission from KIHASA on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DMFT:

Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth

SES:

socioeconomic status

IRB:

the institutional review board

KIHASA:

Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs

NHI:

National Health Insurance

VIF:

Variance inflation factors

SPSS:

Statistical Packages for Social Science

KNHANES:

Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

References

  1. World Health Organization: Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. In. Geneva; 2022.

  2. Iezzoni LI. Eliminating health and health care disparities among the growing population of people with disabilities. Health Aff. 2011;30(10):1947–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization: World Report on Disability. In. Geneva; 2011.

  4. Ko KD, Lee KY, Cho B, Park MS, Son KY, Ha JH, Park SM. Disparities in health-risk behaviors, preventive health care utilizations, and chronic health conditions for people with disabilities: the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(8):1230–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sabariego C, Fellinghauer C, Lee L, Posarac A, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Kamenov K, Cieza A. Measuring functioning and disability using household surveys: metric properties of the brief version of the WHO and World Bank model disability survey. Arch Public Health. 2021;79(1):128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Devinsky O, Boyce D, Robbins M, Pressler M. Dental health in persons with disability. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;110:107174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Akhter R, Hassan NMM, Martin EF, Muhit M, Smithers-Sheedy H, Badawi N, Khandaker G. Caries experience and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy in a low-resource setting. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Anders PL, Davis EL. Oral health of patients with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Special care in Dentistry: Official Publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry. 2010;30(3):110–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oliveira JS, Prado Junior RR, de Sousa Lima KR, de Oliveira Amaral H, Moita Neto JM, Mendes RF. Intellectual disability and impact on oral health: a paired study. Special care in Dentistry: Official Publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry. 2013;33(6):262–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JY, Lim KC, Kim SY, Paik HR, Kim YJ, Jin BH. Oral health status of the disabled compared with that of the non-disabled in Korea: a propensity score matching analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1):e0208246.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. FDI’s definition of oral health. [https://www.fdiworlddental.org/fdis-definition-oral-health].

  12. FDI World Dental Federation: The challenge of oral disease. A call for global action. In. Birghton; 2015.

  13. Oral health in America: a report of the Surgeon General. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2000;28(9):685–95.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kassebaum NJ, Smith AGC, Bernabe E, Fleming TD, Reynolds AE, Vos T, Murray CJL, Marcenes W, Collaborators GBDOH. Global, Regional, and National Prevalence, incidence, and disability-adjusted life years for oral conditions for 195 countries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Diseases, injuries, and risk factors. J Dent Res. 2017;96(4):380–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marcenes W, Kassebaum NJ, Bernabe E, Flaxman A, Naghavi M, Lopez A, Murray CJ. Global burden of oral conditions in 1990–2010: a systematic analysis. J Dent Res. 2013;92(7):592–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wen PYF, Chen MX, Zhong YJ, Dong QQ, Wong HM. Global Burden and Inequality of Dental Caries, 1990 to 2019. J Dent Res. 2022;101(4):392–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Conway DI, Petticrew M, Marlborough H, Berthiller J, Hashibe M, Macpherson LM. Socioeconomic inequalities and Oral cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Int J cancer J Int Du cancer. 2008;122(12):2811–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klinge B, Norlund A. A socio-economic perspective on periodontal Diseases: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(Suppl 6):314–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwendicke F, Dorfer CE, Schlattmann P, Foster Page L, Thomson WM, Paris S. Socioeconomic inequality and caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2015;94(1):10–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Watt RG, Venturelli R, Daly B. Understanding and tackling oral health inequalities in vulnerable adult populations: from the margins to the mainstream. Br Dent J. 2019;227(1):49–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahmoudi E, Meade MA. Disparities in access to health care among adults with physical disabilities: analysis of a representative national sample for a ten-year period. Disabil Health J. 2015;8(2):182–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Okoro CA, Hollis ND, Cyrus AC, Griffin-Blake S. Prevalence of disabilities and Health Care Access by disability status and type among adults - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(32):882–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Moodley J, Ross E. Inequities in health outcomes and access to health care in South Africa: a comparison between persons with and without disabilities. Disabil Soc. 2015;30(4):630–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao X, Wang H. Disparities in unmet health service needs among people with disabilities in China. Int J Qual Health Care. 2021;33(4).

  25. Leal Rocha L, Vieira de Lima Saintrain M. Pimentel Gomes Fernandes Vieira-Meyer A: Access to dental public services by disabled persons. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Reichard A, Stolzle H, Fox MH. Health disparities among adults with physical disabilities or cognitive limitations compared to individuals with no disabilities in the United States. Disabil Health J. 2011;4(2):59–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Department of Health: National Roadmap for Improving the Health of People with Intellectual Disability. In. Canberra: Australian Government; 2021.

  28. Alonso J, Codony M, Kovess V, Angermeyer MC, Katz SJ, Haro JM, De Girolamo G, De Graaf R, Demyttenaere K, Vilagut G, et al. Population level of unmet need for mental healthcare in Europe. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;190:299–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mechanic D. Is the prevalence of mental disorders a good measure of the need for services? Health Aff. 2003;22(5):8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McColl MA, Jarzynowska A, Shortt SED. Unmet health care needs of people with disabilities: population level evidence. Disabil Soc. 2010;25(2):205–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Meade MA, Mahmoudi E, Lee SY. The intersection of disability and healthcare disparities: a conceptual framework. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(7):632–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rotarou ES, Sakellariou D. Access to health care in an age of austerity: disabled people’s unmet needs in Greece. Crit Public Health. 2019;29(1):48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. World Health Organisation: Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030. In. Geneva; 2022.

  34. Kim S, Jeon B. Decomposing disability inequality in Unmet Healthcare needs and preventable hospitalizations: an analysis of the Korea Health Panel. Int J Public Health. 2023;68:1605312.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Miller NA, Kirk A, Kaiser MJ, Glos L. Disparities in access to health care among middle-aged and older adults with disabilities. J Aging Soc Policy. 2014;26(4):324–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sakellariou D, Rotarou ES. Access to healthcare for men and women with disabilities in the UK: secondary analysis of cross-sectional data. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016614.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim SH, Lee YH, Hwang JH, Oh MA, Lee MK, Lee RH, Kang DW, Kwon SJ, Oh HK, Yoon SY, Lee SW. 2014 disability Survey Report. In.: Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2014.

  38. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(KCDC): Korea Health Statistics 2014:Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(KNHANESVI-2). In.: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2015.

  39. Hwang B, Chun SM, Park JH, Shin HI. Unmet healthcare needs in people with disabilities: comparison with the general population in Korea. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35(5):627–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Chae SI, Lee YH, Kim JH, Chun KH, Lee JK. Factors associated with perceived unmet dental care needs of older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17(11):1936–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor H, Holmes AM, Blackburn J. Prevalence of and factors associated with unmet dental need among the US adult population in 2016. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2021;49(4):346–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nagdev P, Iyer MR, Naik S, Khanagar SB, Awawdeh M, Al Kheraif AA, Anil S, Alsarani MM, Vellappally S, Alsadon O. Andersen health care utilization model: a survey on factors affecting the utilization of dental health services among school children. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(6):e0286945.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kim YJ, Lim YW, Paik HR, Lee JY, Kim SY. What influences use of dental services by the Korean disabled people? The role of perceived barriers in dental care system. Community Dent Health. 2019;36(2):101–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kim N, Kim CY, Shin H. Inequality in unmet dental care needs among South Korean adults. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kancherla V, Van Naarden Braun K, Yeargin-Allsopp M. Dental care among young adults with intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(5):1630–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Purohit BM, Singh A. Oral health status of 12-year-old children with disabilities and controls in Southern India. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2012;1(3):330–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Roberts T, Chetty M, Kimmie-Dhansay F, Fieggen K, Stephen LX. Dental needs of intellectualy disabled children attending six special educational facilities in Cape Town. S Afr Med J. 2016;106(6 Suppl 1):94–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shi L, Stevens GD. Vulnerability and unmet health care needs. The influence of multiple risk factors. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(2):148–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Ahn YH, Kim NH, Kim CB, Ham OK. Factors affecting unmet healthcare needs of older people in Korea. Int Nurs Rev. 2013;60(4):510–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lim M, Liberali SAC, Calache H, Parashos P, Borromeo GL. Perceived barriers encountered by oral health professionals in the Australian public dental system providing dental treatment to individuals with special needs. Special care in Dentistry: Official Publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry. 2021;41(3):381–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bedos C, Apelian N, Vergnes JN. Towards a biopsychosocial approach in dentistry: the Montreal-Toulouse Model. Br Dent J. 2020;228(6):465–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Watt RG. From victim blaming to upstream action: tackling the social determinants of oral health inequalities. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35(1):1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kim NH, Kawachi I. Insurance coverage expansion and inequalities in unmet oral healthcare needs in Korea: repeated cross-sectional analysis, 2007–2015. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2021;49(3):232–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lee HY, Kim NH, Kawachi I. Did expansion of insurance coverage for major Diseases in Korea induce a positive spillover effect on dental service utilization? Soc Sci Med. 2022;301:114952.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Noh JW, Kim KB, Park H, Kwon YD. Gender differences in Outpatient utilization: a pooled analysis of data from the Korea Health Panel. J Women’s Health. 2017;26(2):178–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ministry of Health and Welfare National Rehabilitation Center: Development and application of follow-up and health management program according to the results of health examination on persons with disabilities. In.; 2022.

  57. Kim SH, Lee MK, Oh WC, Oh DE, Hwang JH, Oh MA, Kim JM, Lee YH, Kang DW, Kwon SJ, et al. 2020 survey on persons with disabilities. In.: Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The study was financed by the Research Human Resources Development Scholarship in Kyung Hee University College of Dentistry, Republic of Korea, grant number 2022-2-1006183 and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant, Ministry of Science, and ICT (MIST), Republic of Korea, grant number 2021R1F1A1063105.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Na-Hyeon Kim

  2. Department of Preventive and Social Dentistry, Kyung Hee University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Jae-In Ryu

Authors
  1. Na-Hyeon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jae-In Ryu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors, including NK and JR, participated in the design of the study. NK and JR analyzed the data. All authors together wrote, revised, read, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-In Ryu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study used the dataset obtained from the 2014 Survey on Persons with Disabilities. The survey was conducted with participants’ and guardians’ informed consent after approval by the Research Ethics Review Committee of the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (KIHASA) (IRB No. KIHASA IRB-2014-14). This analytical study was approved again by the institutional review board (IRB) of Kyung Hee University (IRB No. KHSIRB-22-442(EA)) as an exemption of the review because this retrospective analysis included the dataset of national surveillance and did not contain personally identifiable information. All methods were carried out following the KNHANES analytic guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, NH., Ryu, JI. Is there a sexual difference in the relationship between sociodemographic information and the unmet dental care needs of disabled adults? An analysis from a national survey on persons with disabilities. BMC Oral Health 23, 830 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03576-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03576-w

Keywords

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us