 Research article
 Open Access
 Published:
Finite element analysis of archwire parameters and activation forces on the M/F ratio of vertical, L and Tloops
BMC Oral Health volume 20, Article number: 70 (2020)
Abstract
Background
The ability of a loop to generate a certain moment/force ratio (M/F ratio) can achieve the desired tooth movement in orthodontics. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of elastic modulus, crosssectional dimensions, loop configuration geometry dimensions, and activation force on the generated M/F ratio of vertical, L and Tloops.
Methods
A total of 120 threedimensional loop models were constructed with the Solidworks 2017 software and used for simulating loop activation with the Abaqus 6.14 software. Six vertical loop variations, 9 Lloop variations, and 9 Tloop variations were evaluated. In each group, only one parameter was variable [loop height, ring radius, leg length, leg step distance, legs distance, upper length, different archwire materials (elastic modulus), crosssectional dimension, and activation force].
Results
The simulation results of the displacement and von Mises stress of each loop were investigated. The maximum displacement in the height direction was recorded to calculate the M/F ratio. The quantitative change trends in the generated M/F ratio of the loops with respect to various variables were established.
Conclusions
Increasing the loop height can increase the M/F ratio of the loop. This increasing trend is, especially, much more significant in Tloops compared with vertical loops and Lloops. In vertical loops, increasing the ring radius is much more effective than increasing the loop height to increase the M/F ratio of the loop. Compared with SS, TMA archwire loops can generate a higher M/F ratio due to its lower elastic modulus. Loops with a small crosssectional area and high activation force can generate a high M/F ratio. The introduction of a leg step to loops does not increase the M/F ratio of loops.
Background
Orthodontic space closure can be achieved using sliding or loop mechanics. In sliding mechanics, friction is generated between the wire and the bracket, which may decrease the rate of tooth movement [1,2,3]. In loop mechanics, which is a frictionless technique, forces generated by the loops can be directly transmitted to the teeth without losing force or moment [4,5,6]. Different loop designs have been introduced, such as vertical [1, 2], T [3], L, and teardrop loops, among others. The M/F ratio can control tooth movement patterns [7, 8]; small differences in the M/F ratio result in different tooth movement patterns [9].
Great attention must be paid to the mechanical properties of loops to deliver a predetermined M/F ratio to a tooth. Nowadays, clinical judgment for most orthodontics depends on experience. Clearly, rigorous engineering approaches are needed to study the mechanical properties of loops and identify the dominant design factors that can be used to control loop behavior. Several studies [10,11,12,13,14] examined the ability of a loop design to generate various M/F ratios, especially a sufficiently high M/F ratio for tooth translation and the loop characteristics that determine this ratio.
The mechanical properties generated by loops depend on many confounding factors. The influence of loop material and shape, end conditions (ligation methods), and activation render analysis difficult. These influencing factors can be divided into two groups: one related to loop design and the other related to loop activation. The former includes loop material, crosssectional dimensions, and configuration geometry, which fundamentally determine the delivered force system of the loop.
Techalertpaisarn and Versluis [15,16,17] showed that the loop properties varied with loop configuration and position, highlighting that clinicians should understand the specific characteristics of each loop configuration so as to most effectively exploit them for the desired tooth movements. Burstone and Koenig [18] demonstrated that the M/F ratio increased with the loop height and gingivalside width and decreased with the occlusalside width. However, limited information is available regarding the quantitative mechanical properties of loops. Quantitative knowledge of the mechanical properties of loops allows clinicians to make an informed decision when selecting and designing loops.
Systematic determination of the biomechanical characteristics of loops is not possible clinically. However, these mechanical properties can be evaluated using the finite element method (FEM), which is a computer simulation technique used to simulate and predict the mechanical properties of loops, allowing accurate control of loop shape, properties, fixation, and loading [16, 19, 20].
Considering this, the present study aimed to systematically evaluate the mechanical characteristics, especially the M/F ratio, of the vertical, L and Tloops using the Abaqus 6.14 software, with a view to ascertaining the quantitative effect of the variables, such as elastic modulus, crosssectional dimensions, loop configuration geometric dimensions, and activation force, on the generated M/F ratio. A detailed perusal of the changes in mathematical trends suggests that a better method of designing the loops can provide an accurate and constant M/F ratio. The investigated quantitative principles of mechanics can be applied to the orthodontic loop design.
Methods
Geometric modeling of the loops
Three types of closing loop designs were evaluated in the present study: vertical, L and Tloops. These three designs and their basic dimensions are shown in Fig. 1ac.
Six vertical loop variations, 9 Lloop variations, and 9 Tloop variations were evaluated. These variations and their ranges and intervals are listed in Table 1. A total of 141 orthodontic loops were subjected to 3D analysis using FEM. These loop models were all constructed using the Solidworks 2017 software.
Conversion of the geometric model into a 3D finite element model
The solid loop models were imported into the Abaqus 6.14 software, and a 3D finite element model was created. The highprecision eightnode hexahedron element and structural mesh techniques were used to establish the precise finite element loop models. The approximate global element size of the mesh was set as 0.1. Approximately 9000, 13,000, and 13,000 elements were used for the vertical, L, and Tloops, respectively.
Material properties
The materials of the loops were assumed to be SS and TMA. The elastic modulus used are listed in Table 1; the Poisson ratio was equal to 0.3.
Boundary conditions and applied load
For modeling activation similar to previous studies [19, 26], one end of the loop was totally fixed in all directions to prevent rigid bodily motion, simulating the ligation of the archwire to the bracket, and a horizontally activated force was applied to the nodes at the other end (Fig. 2).
Results
Highest von Mises stress and displacement of the loops
The loop strength should be sufficient, and the highest stress should not reach the yield strength during treatment. Following activation, the loops deformed and the moment was generated at the end of the loop delivered to the tooth. For mechanical knowledge, the generated moment was associated with loop deformation. Therefore, the simulation results of the highest von Mises stress and displacement in the height direction of the loops were recorded.
The highest von Mises stress was located on the inner top surface of the ring in the vertical loops (Fig. 3a), on the inner right surface of the ring in the Lloops (Fig. 3b), and on the inner left surface of the ring in the Tloops (Fig. 3c). Also, the highest von Mises stress was always located on the inner surface of the ring. Figure 3 shows that the maximum displacement of the loops was always located on the moving legs.
The deformed vertical loop was used to illustrate the calculation of the generated moment of the loop following activation, as shown in Fig. 4. This loop system should satisfy the equilibrium equation; thus, a horizontal force in the opposite direction must exist at the fixed end for F^{′} = F (Fig. 4). Due to the deformation of the loop, the active lines of the two forces were not collinear; thus, a moment M = F • h acting at the fixed end should exist to maintain the rotational equilibrium (Fig. 4), where h is the maximum displacement in the height direction of the moving leg end. For calculating the M/F value, M/F = (F • h)/F = h. Therefore, the M/F ratio of the loop was equal to the displacement in the height direction of the moving leg end.
For the deformation induced by activation, the value of h was always smaller than the loop height H, which could account for the results obtained by Chacko et al. [20], who stated: “no loop can attain an M/F ratio greater than its height.” Sumi et al. [14] also demonstrated that the M/F ratio generated by the Tloop or the Opus loop could never be higher than its vertical height.
Mechanical properties of vertical loops
M/F ratio
The M/F value increased linearly with increases in the loop height, ring radius, leg length, and activation force (Fig. 5ac, g), and decreased linearly with increases in the leg step distance and elastic modulus (Fig. 5de). A linear relationship was illustrated by deriving the regression equations. Figure 5f shows that the M/F ratio decreased as the crosssectional area increased. The maximum M/F ratio was found in the archwire with the lowest crosssectional area of 0.016″ × 0.022″.
von Mises stress
The highest von Mises stress of the loops increased linearly with increases in the loop height and activation force (Fig. 6a and g); however, the highest von Mises stress decreased with increases in the ring radius, leg step distance, and crosssectional area (Fig. 6b, d, and f). Figure 6c and e shows that the highest von Mises stress of the loops remained constant during the variation in the leg length and elastic modulus.
Mechanical properties of the Lloops
M/F ratio
The M/F ratio increased with increases in the loop height, legs distance, upper length, activation force, and leg length; the former four of these were linear increases, and the latter was almost an exponential increase (Fig. 7a, e, f, i, and c).
The M/F ratio decreased linearly with increases in the ring radius, leg step distance, and elastic modulus (Fig. 7b, d, and g). The change trend in the M/F ratio with increases in the crosssectional area was the same as that seen in the vertical loops (Fig. 7h).
Von Mises stress
The change trends in the highest von Mises stress with increases in the loop height, activation force, ring radius, leg step distance, crosssectional area, leg length, and elastic modulus were the same as those in the vertical loops (Fig. 8ad and gi). Figure 8e and f shows that the highest von Mises stress of the loops remained the same on variation in the legs distance and upper length.
Mechanical properties of the Tloops
M/F ratio
The M/F ratio increased linearly with increases in the loop height, leg length, legs distance, upper length, and activation force, and decreased linearly with increases in the ring radius, leg step distance, elastic modulus, and crosssectional area (Fig. 9ai).
Von Mises stress
Figure 10 shows that the change trends in the highest von Mises stress with various variables were similar to those in the Lloops.
Discussion
Loop height
The M/F ratio and the highest von Mises stress generated by vertical, L and Tloops increased linearly with increases in the loop height. In other words, the higher the loop height, the larger the M/F ratio generated by the loop. This finding was consistent with those of other studies [13, 18, 26,27,28]. Ribeiro et al. [13] demonstrated that the M/F ratio increased with increases in the loop height of composite nickeltitanium Tloops. For minor changes in the loop height, the conversion of conventional Tloops into Mloops would increase the M/F ratio. MuñozRendón [27] reported that the convex upper bend of Mloops produced an increased total loop moment compared with Tloops because the upper convex bending increased the total loop height. Moreover, Burstone and Koenig [18] reported that the height of the loop matters more than the length.
The regression equations for the M/F ratio with increases in the loop height of the vertical, L and Tloops were y = 0.1389x − 0.366, y = 0.1912x − 0.4017, and y = 0.2705x − 0.474, respectively. The slopes of the regression equations indicate an increased rate of the M/F ratio. The slope of the Tloop was the largest, 0.2705; therefore, the increase in the M/F ratio in the Tloop was the highest, followed by the Lloop and the vertical loop.
Ring radius
The M/F ratio increased linearly with an increase in the ring radius of the vertical loops; however, it decreased linearly in the L and Tloops. The regression equations were y = 0.2222x − 0.844, y = − 0.1668x + 1.7365, and y = − 0.2398x + 2.5325, respectively. Moreover, the highest von Mises stress decreased exponentially with an increase in the ring radius.
The aforementioned results of the vertical loops showed that the regression slope of the ring radius, 0.2222, was higher than that of the loop height, 0.1389. Therefore, it was inferred that increasing the ring radius was much more efficient than increasing the loop height when the goal was to increase the M/F ratio in vertical loops. In particular, unlike increases in the loop height, increases in the ring radius could decrease the stress. Nevertheless, the ring radius should be kept to a minimum to gain a high M/F ratio in L and Tloops, as long as the stress strength allows.
Legs distance and upper length
The extra dimensions of the legs distance and upper length in the L and Tloops had the same effect as that of the ring radius in the vertical loops. The M/F ratio of the L and Tloops increased linearly with increases in the legs distance and upper length. Moreover, the highest von Mises stress remained constant upon increases in the legs distance and upper length.
The regression equations of the M/F ratio with increases in the legs distance and upper length were y = 0.133x − 0.14258 and y = 0.0495x + 1.0916 in the Lloops, and y = 0.0294x + 2.2672 and y = 0.1645x + 0.65 in the Tloops, respectively. This indicated that the increase in the M/F ratio with an increase in the legs distance was much higher than that with an increase in the upper length of the Lloops, since 0.133 > 0.0495. However, the increase in the M/F ratio with an increase in the upper length was much higher than that with an increase in the legs distance of the Tloops, since 0.1645 > 0.0294. Despite this, the increase was still lower than that with an increase in the loop height, since 0.1912 > 0.133 and 0.2705 > 0.1645 in the L and Tloops, respectively. Increasing the legs distance in Lloops and increasing the upper length in Tloops remained the options to increase the M/F ratio, especially since the loop stress was not increased.
Leg length
The M/F ratio increased with an increase in the leg length in all three types of loops, with the change trends in the vertical and Tloops being linear. The regression equations were y = 0.097x + 0.0972 and y = 0.178x + 0.4336, respectively. Moreover, the highest von Mises stress remained constant with an increase in the leg length. In the Tloop, the increase in the M/F ratio (0.178) with an increase in the leg length was higher than that with an increase in the upper length (0.1645), but lower than that with an increase in the loop height (0.2705). Therefore, increasing the leg length was also an option to increase the M/F ratio, especially in Tloops.
Leg step distance
The M/F ratio decreased linearly with an increase in the leg step distance of vertical, L and Tloops. Obviously, the introduction of steps in legs decreases the M/F ratio of loops; therefore, leg steps should be avoided when designing vertical, L and Tloops.
Elastic modulus
The M/F ratio decreased linearly with an increase in the elastic modulus. Moreover, the elastic modulus had no influence on the highest von Mises stress of the loops. When the material was taken as TMA, with an elastic modulus of 66 GPa, the generated M/F ratio was 3.235 mm, 4.768 mm, and 6.955 mm in the vertical, L and Tloops, respectively. When the material was taken as SS, with an elastic modulus of 200 GPa, the generated M/F ratio was 1.067 mm, 1.574 mm, and 2.295 mm in vertical, L and Tloops, respectively. This indicated that the M/F ratio generated by the loops made with TMA was approximately three times larger than that generated by the loops made with SS. These results explained why Safavi et al. [10] found that SS Tloops failed to deliver the optimum M/F ratio of 10:1, but Rose et al. [12] found that the optimal M/F ratio for orthodontic translation could be achieved using TMA Tloops.
Considering the loop configuration in the basic sizes, the M/F ratio generated by the Tloops was the highest, followed by the Lloops, and that generated by the vertical loops was the lowest. In other words, Tloops could generate a higher M/F ratio than vertical or Lloops with similar dimensions.
Burstone and Koenig [18] and Safavi [10] demonstrated that the momenttoforce ratio generated by Tloops was higher than that generated by vertical loops of the same loop height. Moreover, Chacko et al. [20] concluded that a Tloop was preferred over a closed helical loop.
The basic Tloop in the present study, with an elastic modulus of 66 GPa, generated an M/F ratio of 6.955 mm. According to the aforementioned discussion, this M/F ratio could be further increased by increasing the loop height, leg length, legs distance, and upper length. Therefore, it was possible for a Tloop to provide an M/F ratio as high as 10 mm to accomplish tooth translational movement. Choosing an appropriate archwire material that had the lowest elastic modulus and sufficient strength was much more feasible than increasing the geometric dimensions, due to vestibular space limitations.
As shown by Burstone [6], among the normally used loops, Tloops made of betatitanium alloy were considered one of the best types, since they produced the highest M/F ratio.
Crosssectional area
The M/F ratio decreased with an increase in the crosssectional area. For the four commonly used archwire crosssectional areas, the minimum area of 0.016″ × 0.022″ generated a higher M/F ratio than that of the other areas in loops of the same type, dimensions, and material parameters. However, the highest von Mises stress of the loops increased with a decrease in the crosssectional area. Therefore, the archwire crosssectional area should be as small as possible to gain a high M/F ratio, if the loop strength is sufficient.
Almeida et al. [24] also demonstrated that the M/F ratio was dependent on the wire size. The larger wires were found to produce higher forces, with a slight increase in the moment; however, the M/F ratio produced by the 0.016″ × 0.022″ wire was the highest compared with that produced by 0.017″ × 0.025″ and 0.017″ × 0.025″ wires.
Activation force
The M/F ratio increased linearly with increases in the activation force of the vertical, L and Tloops. The magnitude of the activation force is usually determined according to the stress tolerance of periodontal tissues. According to the literature [29, 30], a range of 0.74–1.96 N is needed to obtain satisfactory orthodontic movement.
In summary, the archwire material, crosssectional area, loop configuration and dimensions, and activation force have a great influence on the generated M/F ratio of the vertical, L and Tloops. It is important to note that the ligation method, loaddeflection rate, and other factors may also affect the final generated M/F ratio of a loop during clinical treatment and should also be considered in future investigations.
Conclusions
This study was novel in using the FEM combined with static analysis theory to precisely analyze the influence degree and trend of various parameters on the loop force system, especially the M/F ratio.
Increasing the loop height can increase the M/F ratio of the loop. This increasing trend is, especially, much more significant in Tloops compared with vertical loops and Lloops. In vertical loops, increasing the ring radius is much more effective than increasing the loop height to increase the M/F ratio of the loop. Compared with SS, TMA archwire loops can generate a higher M/F ratio due to its lower elastic modulus. Loops with a small crosssectional area and high activation force can generate a high M/F ratio. The introduction of a leg step to loops does not increase the M/F ratio of loops.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Abbreviations
 FEM:

Finite element method
 M/F ratio:

Moment/force ratio
 SS:

Stainless steel
 TMA:

Titanium molybdenum alloy
References
 1.
Tominaga J, Ozaki H, Chiang PG, Sumi M, Tanaka M, Koga Y, et al. Effect of bracket slot and archwire dimensions on anterior tooth movement during space closure in sliding mechanics: A 3dimensional finite element study. Am J Orthod Detofacial Orthop. 2014;146:166–74.
 2.
Burrow SJ. Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;135:442–7.
 3.
Sivakumar A, Valiathan A. An intraarch retraction mechanicsa contemporary review. J Ind Orthod Soc. 2006;39:101–9..
 4.
Proffit WR. Closure of extraction space. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM, editors. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th ed. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. p. 592–601.
 5.
Nanda R, Ghosh J. Principles of biomechanics. In: Nanda R, editor. Biomechanics in clinical orthodontics. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1997. p. 6–8.
 6.
Burstone CJ. The segmented arch approach to space closure. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:361–78.
 7.
Proffit WR. Contemporary orthodontics. St Louis: Mosby Publishing; 1986.
 8.
Tanne K, Koenig HA, Burstone CJ. Moment to force ratios and the center of rotation. Am J Orthod Detofacial Orthop. 1988;94:426–31.
 9.
Gjessing P. Controlled retraction of maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;101:120–31.
 10.
Safavi MR, Geramy A, Khezri AK. M/F ratios of four different closing loops: 3D analysis using the finite element method (FEM). Aust Orthod J. 2006;22:121.
 11.
Chen J, Isikbay SC, Brizendine EJ. Quantification of threedimensional orthodontic force systems of Tloop archwires. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:754–8.
 12.
Rose D, Quick A, Swain M, et al. Momenttoforce characteristics of preactivated nickeltitanium and titaniummolybdenum alloy symmetrical Tloops. Am J Orthod Detofacial Orthop. 2009;135:757–63.
 13.
Ribeiro A, Martins L, Junior RS, White L, Martins R. Effects of height and overactivation on a composite nickeltitanium Tloop. J World Fed Orthod. 2017;6:120–6.
 14.
Sumi M, Koga Y, Tominaga JY, et al. Innovative design of closing loops producing an optimal force system applicable in the 0.022in bracket slot system. Am J Orthod Detofacial Orthop. 2016;150:968–78.
 15.
Techalertpaisarn P, Versluis A. How do mechanical responses at closing loop ends vary when loop position changes? A systematic analysis of vertical, T, and Lloops. Oral Sci Int. 2013;10:58–64.
 16.
Techalertpaisarn P, Versluis A, Versluis B. Mechanical properties of opus closing loops, Lloops, and Tloops investigated with finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Detofacial Orthop. 2013;143:675–83.
 17.
Techalertpaisarn P, Versluis A. Effect of apical portion of T, sloped L, and reversed Lclosing loops on their force systems. Angle Orthod. 2016;87:104.
 18.
Burstone CJ, Koenig HA. Optimizing anterior and canine retraction. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:1–19.
 19.
Techalertpaisarn P, Versluis A. Tloop force system with and without vertical step using finite element analysis. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:372–9.
 20.
Chacko A, Tikku T, Khanna R, et al. Comparative assessment of the efficacy of closed helical loop and Tloop for space closure in lingual orthodonticsa finite element study. Prog Orthod. 2018;19:14.
 21.
Kojima Y, Fukui H. Numerical simulations of canine retraction with Tloop springs based on the updated momenttoforce ratio. Europ J Orthod. 2012;34:10.
 22.
Haris TPM, Francis PG, Margaret VA, Roshan G, Menon V, Jojee V. Evaluation of biomechanical properties of four loops at different activation: a finite element method study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19:778–84.
 23.
Geramy A, Tanne K, Moradi M, et al. Finite element analysis of the convergence of the centers of resistance and rotation in extreme momenttoforce ratios[J]. Int Orthod. 2016;14:161–70.
 24.
Almeida L, Ribeiro A, Parsekian Martins R, et al. Nickel titanium Tloop wire dimensions for en masse retraction. Angle Orthod. 2016:070515–449.1.
 25.
Jiang F, Chen J, Kula K, et al. Root resorptions associated with canine retraction treatment. Am J Orthod Detofacial Orthop. 2017;152:348–54.
 26.
Martins RP, Buschang PH, Martins LP, Gandini LG Jr. Optimizing the design of preactivated titanium Tloop springs with loop software. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;134:161–6.
 27.
MuñozRendón WA, MontoyaGoez YdJ, GómezGil DF. M/F Changes after Tloop Upper Horizontal Bending in Segmented Arch Mechanics. Int J Odontostomatology. 2016;10:333–41.
 28.
Faulkner MG, Fuchshuber P, Haberstock D, Mioduchowski A. A parametric study of the force/moment systems produced by Tloop retraction springs. J Biomech. 1989;22:637–47.
 29.
Nicolai RJ. On optimum orthodontic force theory as applied to canine retraction. Am J Orthod. 1975;68:290–302.
 30.
Gjessing P. Biomechanical design and clinical evaluation of a new canineretraction spring. Am J Orthod. 1985;87:353–62.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This study was supported by Major Science and Technology Project of Hainan Province (Grant No. 118QN184) and Hainan University [Grant No. KYQD(ZR)1835].
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
YC did all the research work for this study. The author read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Cai, Y. Finite element analysis of archwire parameters and activation forces on the M/F ratio of vertical, L and Tloops. BMC Oral Health 20, 70 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s129030201059z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Keywords
 M/F ratio
 Loop mechanics
 Loop design parameter
 Activation force
 Finite element analysis